36
Public Hearing Academic Excellence Indicator System 2011-2012 Linda Theret, Assistant Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction 1
1
Public HearingAcademic Excellence Indicator System 2011-2012
Linda Theret, Assistant SuperintendentCurriculum and Instruction
Annual Report and Public Hearing
Laredo ISD
January 15, 2013
2
Academic Excellence Indicator System 2011-2012
Academic Excellence Indicator System(AEIS)
Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute Published annually since 1990-91 2011 Accountability Manual
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2011/manual/index.html Required reporting guidelines at public hearings TEC §39.261 requires districts to post on the students report cards
• the student’s campus distinction designation or if the campus has been designated an unacceptable rating (no state ratings assigned for 2011-2012)
TEC §39.262 requires districts to post on their website • the most current accountability ratings, Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)
reports, and School Report Cards (no SRC for 2011-2012), by the 10th day after the first day of instruction of each school year
Gives parents and community a snapshot of • District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report)• District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report) • District/Campus Performance (Section III of AEIS Report)
Contains all data used to determine District/Campus accountability ratings Uses data collected through:
• State data reporting system (PEIMS)• Student assessment system (TAKS)
3
4
2011-2012 State Enrollment
ECE Pre K K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
13,231
224,322
379,093392,017
383,181379,079375,473377,502372,602365,903360,027
393,268
346,573
322,783
293,066
5
2011- 2012 LISD Enrollment
ECE Pre K
K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3
2,412
1,982
2,303
1,9911,8591,916
1,7931,6151,5631,581
2,019
1,448
1,0951,181
6
2011 – 2012 Student Percent ComparisonEthnicity and Economically Disadvantage
Africa
n Amer
ican
Hispan
icWhit
e
America
n Ind
ianAsia
n
Pacific I
sland
er
Two o
r mor
e Rac
es
Econ
. Disa
dv.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
12.8
50.8
30.5
0.43.6
0.1 1.7
60.4
0
99.5
0.3 0 0.1 0 0
97.2
StateLISD
7
AEIS 2011 – 2012Reading (Grades 10 & 11)
State Region I District50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
9390
87
9289
87
20112012
8
AEIS 2011 – 2012Math (Grades 10 & 11)
State Region I District50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
8280 79
82 81
7620112012
9
AEIS 2011 – 2012Science (Grades 10 & 11)
State Region I District50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
83
77
70
8480
68
20112012
10
AEIS 2011 – 2012 Social Studies (Grades 10 & 11)
State Region I District50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
10096
9490
9694
91
20112012
LISD High School AEISCampus Martin Nixon Cigarroa ECHS
ELA 85% 90% 85% 99%
Math 77% 73% 76% 95%
Science 62% 68% 66% 98%
Social Studies 94% 90% 86% 99%
11
12
College Readiness IndicatorAdvanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion
State Region I District0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
26.3%
29.7%
23.1%
30.3%31.6%
29.0%
20102011
This indicator is based on a count of students who complete and receive credit for at least one advanced course in grades 9-12.
13
College Ready IndicatorsAP/IB Results
Scores >= Criterion
State Region I District0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%46.7%
25.0%
13.8%
45.2%
21.6%
10.4%
20102011
*Percent of scores for juniors and seniors at or above the criterion score 3 on AP or 4 on IB
14
College Readiness IndicatorRHSP/DAP Graduates
State Region I District70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
82.7%
91.8%
94.0%
80.1%
90.8%
86.0%Class of 2010Class of 2011
The number of graduates reported with graduation codes for Recommended High School Program or Distinguished Achievement Program divided by the number of graduates.
15
College Readiness Indicators Texas Success Initiative (TSI)-ELA
State Region I District0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70% 66%
56%52%
61%
54%51%
20112012
The percent of students who were exempted from taking a test for the Texas Success Initiative because they had a high enough score on their exit-level TAKS tests for mathematics and English language arts (ELA), as set by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB).
16
College Readiness Indicators Texas Success Initiative (TSI)-Math
The percent of students who were exempted from taking a test for the Texas Success Initiative because they had a high enough score on their exit-level TAKS tests for mathematics and English language arts (ELA), as set by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB).
State Region I District0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
69%63%
69%73%
69%
77%
20112012
17
College Ready GraduatesELA
Combination ELA score of 2200 TAKS and 3+ composition score or 1070 total SAT or 23 composite ACT.
State Region I District0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70% 66%
56%51%
64%
53%
46%
Class of 2010Class of 2011
18
College Ready GraduatesMath
Combination mathematics score of 2200 TAKS or 1070 total SAT or 23 composite ACT.
State Region I District50%
52%
54%
56%
58%
60%
62%
64%
66%
68%
64%
58%57%
67%
61% 61%
Class of 2010Class of 2011
19
District, Region, State Attendance Rate
The total number of days students were present in 2010-11 divided by thetotal number of days students were in membership in 2010-11.
State Region District90.0%
91.0%
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
95.5% 95.5% 95.6%95.7% 95.6%96.0%
2009 - 20102010 - 2011
5 Year Graduation RateDistrict Wide
20A student’s 06-07 cohort graduated within 5 yrs. still counts for class of 2010
State Region District80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
85.1
83.4
82.7
8887.4 87.4
Class of 2009Class of 2010
21
Teachers Percent Comparison by Ethnicity and Gender
Africa
n Amer
ican
Hispan
icW
hite
America
n Indian
Asian
Pacific I
slander
Two o
r Mor
e Rac
esMale
s
Female
s0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
9.2
24.4
63.4
0.4 1.3 0.1 1.2
23.2
76.8
0.3
95.2
3.1 0.2 1.2 0 0
27.5
72.5
StateDistrict
22
Teachers Percent by Years of Experience
0 Years 1-5 Years 6-10 Years 11-20 Years Over 20 Years
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
4.6
28.7
22.3
26.6
17.9
1.6
26.225 25.8
21.3
StateDistrict
23
Turnover Percent Rate for Teachers
2010 - 2011 2011 - 20120
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
11.912.6
8.3
10.6
StateDistrict
This percent shows the total FTE count of teachers from the fall of 2010-11 who were subsequently not employed in the district in the fall of 2011-12, divided by the total teacher FTE count for the fall of 2010-11.
Staff Salary Information State District
Beginning $40,911 $41,466
1-5 Years Experience $43,699 $44,915
6-10 Years Experience $46,224 $47,024
11-20 Years Experience $50,064 $49,872
Over 20 Years Experience
$58,031 $60,105
24
Financial Information
Calendar year 2011 Tax InformationAdopted Tax Rate
Maintenance & Operations: $1.040Interest & Sinking Fund #: $0.234Total Rate (sum of above): $1.274
Note: Total Rate has not changed since 2007.Fund Balance
• Fund Balance (End of Year 2010-11 audited): $58,910,905
25The amount of undesignated, unreserved fund balance that existed at the end of the 2010-11 school year
is reported for each district.
26
English as a Second Language District Performance (Grades 10 & 11)
Reading/ELA Mathematics Science Social Studies0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
54 54
37
70
5045
25
74
20112012
27
Possession of Controlled SubstanceDistrict Wide
Violations include, but not limited to, selling, being in possession, being under the influence of marijuana or any other controlled substance (including felony charges for controlled substance abuse).
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/sas/broker
2010-2011 2011-2012142
144
146
148
150
152
154
156
158
160
162160
149
Control Substance/Drugs
28
Violation of Code of Conduct District Wide
Violations include, but not limited to:LEVEL I – cheating, leaving school without permission, inappropriate physical contact, possessing electronic devices, violating dress code standards and disobeying rules concerning conduct while on school busesLEVEL II – stealing, extortion, discharging a fire extinguisher when there is no fire, fighting, bullying and hazing.
2010-2011 2011-20120
500100015002000250030003500400045005000
3431
4307
Violation of Code of Conduct
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/sas/broker
29
Criminal Mischief District Wide
Violations primarily include, but are not limited to, vandalism, destruction of property, graffiti, etc.
2010-2011 2011-201224
27
30
33
28
31
Criminal Mischief
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/sas/broker
30
Discipline Action DAEP District Wide
2010-2011 2011-20120
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
627
520
DAEP
Placement in on/off CAMP DAEP
31
Discipline Code Firearms
2010-2011 2011-20120
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 0
Firearms
*No firearms have been found in LISD in current and/or previous school year.
32
Fighting Mutual Combat District Wide
Defined when both the parties enter voluntarily; it implies a common intent to fight, but not necessarilyan exchange of blows.
2010-2011 2011-20120
50
100
150
200
250
300
102
277
Fighting Mutual Combat
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/sas/broker
33
Students with 10+ Unexcused Absences District Wide
http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/sas/broker
2010-2011 2011-20120
100
200
300
400
500
600
700 658
486
10+ unexcused absences
3 yr. Comparison Ratings for LISDNo Ratings for 2012
34
Campus 2009 Accountability Ratings 2010 Accountability Ratings 2011 Accountability RatingsLaredo Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically AcceptableMartin H S Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically AcceptableNixon H S Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically AcceptableDr. Leo Cigarroa H S Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically AcceptableEarly College Exemplary Exemplary ExemplaryChristen Middle Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically AcceptableLamar Middle Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable
Joaquin Cigarroa Middle Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable
Memorial Middle Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically Unacceptable Bruni Elem. Academically Acceptable Recognized Recognized Don Jose Gallego Elem. Recognized Academically Acceptable Recognized Daiches Elem. Academically Acceptable Recognized Academically Acceptable
Farias Elem. Academically Acceptable Academically Unacceptable Recognized Heights Elem. Recognized Recognized RecognizedTarver Elem. Recognized Academically Acceptable Recognized Leyendecker Elem. Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Academically AcceptableMacdonell Elem. Academically Acceptable Exemplary Recognized Milton Elem. Recognized Exemplary Recognized Pierce Elem. Academically Acceptable Recognized Recognized Ryan Elem. Recognized Recognized RecognizedSanta Maria Elem. Academically Acceptable Recognized Academically Acceptable Santo Nino Elem. Recognized Exemplary Recognized
D.D. Hachar Elem. Academically Unacceptable Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable
J.C. Martin Elem. Academically Unacceptable Academically Acceptable Academically Unacceptable H.B. Zachry Elem. Academically Acceptable Recognized Academically Acceptable Kawas Elem. Recognized Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable
Dovalina Elem. Academically Unacceptable Academically Unacceptable Academically Acceptable Ligarde Elem. Recognized Recognized Academically Acceptable
T. Sanchez /H. Ochoa Elem. Academically Acceptable Academically Acceptable Recognized
Accessing the AEIS Reports
The report is available:TEA website http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/sas/broker District websitehttp://www.laredoisd.org/ Campus libraries or offices
35
Annual Report and Public Hearing
Laredo ISD
January 15, 2013
36
Academic Excellence Indicator System 2011-2012
