+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

Date post: 21-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: rachel-cannon
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
41
Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005
Transcript
Page 1: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

Linear ColliderHitoshi Murayama (Berkeley)EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005

Page 2: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

2

Take-home messages

•We are approaching a new layer of energy scale: something is brewing at TeV-scale

•Solutions to many deep puzzles hinge on what we find at this energy scale

•multiple tools needed to get a complete picture

Page 3: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

3

Outline

•Brief Recap of Science

•Need for Multiple Tools

•Dark Field=Cosmic Superconductor

•Linear Collider

Page 4: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

Brief Recap of Science

Page 5: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

5

Energy budget of Universe

•Stars and galaxies are only ~0.5%

•Neutrinos are ~0.1–1.5%

•Rest of ordinary matter

•(electrons, protons & neutrons) are 4.4%

•Dark Matter 23%

•Dark Energy 73%

•Anti-Matter 0%

•Dark Field (Higgs) ~1062%??

Page 6: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

6

Einstein’s Dream•Is there an underlying

simplicity behind vast phenomena in Nature?

•Einstein dreamed to come up with a unified description

•But he failed to unify electromagnetism and gravity (GR)

Page 7: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

7

History of Unification

gravity

electric magnetic

α-decay

-decay

-decay

planets apple electromagnet

ism

atoms

Quantum mechanics

mechanics

Special relativityQuantum ElectroDynamics

Weak force

Strong Force

Electroweak theory

GR

String theory? Grand Unification?

Page 8: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

8

deeper into the heart of the

matter (literally)

My son on Halloween!Einstein?

increase resolution

Page 9: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

9

resolution=energy

•Quantum Mechanics: particle=wave

•higher energy

•= shorter wavelength

•= better resolution

low energy

high energy

Page 10: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

10

a new layer of unification

•Unification of electromagnetic and weak forces

⇒electroweak theory

•Long-term goal since ‘60s

•We are finally getting there!

•If they are unified, what makes them so different?

⇒Dark Field!

HERA ep collider

EM

weak

electromagnet

ism

weak

Page 11: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

inflation

unificationstringanti-matter

Page 12: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

Need for Multiple Tools

Page 13: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

13

Multiple Wavebands

in Astronomy

Page 14: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

14

Evidence forDark Matter

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

Galaxies are held together by mass far bigger than all stars combined

Radiovisible

Page 15: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

15

•Yet another tool: cosmic microwave background

•matter/all atoms=6.03±0.03

•Dominant paradigm:

•Stable heavy particle produced in early Universe (E=mc2!)

•left-over from near-complete annihilation

•TeV: the correct temperature to produce them

Dark Matter is not atoms

Page 16: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

16

Telescopes vs Accelerators

aim need telescopes acceleratorsprobe deeper

better resolution

better mirrors, CCD

higher energy

better imagebetter

exposure

larger telescopes, more time

more powerful beams

(luminosity)

full understandi

ng

multiple probes

visible, radio, X-ray,

infrared, UV, gamma

protons, electrons, neutrinos

Page 17: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

17

QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Strong Force•Back to 1930s•atomic nuclei made of

protons and neutrons•why don’t protons

repel each other and nuclei disintegrate?

•a new mysterious “strong force” binding them together

•range of the force 0.000001 nanometer

•need 100 MeV to study

Yukawa predicted the force carrier whose mass is 100 MeV in 1933

discovered in 1947 (140 MeV)case closed?

Page 18: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

18

Strong Force•It was rather just

the beginning

•Soon proliferation of strongly-interacting particles at proton-based machines

•a big mess! (i.e. fun)

Page 19: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

19

Obstruction to Cosmology

•S. Weinberg “Gravitation and Cosmology” (1972)

•15.11 The Very Early Universe• If we look back into the first 0.0001 sec of cosmic history,

we encounter theoretical problems. At such temperatures copious number of strongly interacting particles will be in a state of continual mutual interaction and cannot reasonably be expected to obey any simple equation of state.

•There are two extremely different simple models that reflect two divergent views of the nature of the strongly interacting particles. Neither model can be taken seriously.

Page 20: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

20

Electron scattering•electron proton

scattering experiment

•looked dumb because electrons don’t do the strong force

•clear roles:

•electron=probe

•proton=object

•found that protons have constituents: “quarks”

•1990 Nobel:

•Friedman, Kendall, Taylor

Page 21: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

21

electron positron collider

can see quarks and a gluon ~19802004 Nobel to Gross, Wilczek, Politzer

Page 22: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

Dark Field =cosmic

superconductor

Page 23: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

23

Mystery ofthe “weak force”•Gravity pulls two

massive bodies (long-ranged)

•Electric force repels two like charges (long-ranged)

•“Weak force” pulls protons and electrons (short-ranged) acts only over 0.000000001 nanometer

•[need it for the Sun to burn!]

•We know the energy scale: 0.3 TeV

Page 24: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

24

We are swimming in Dark Field

•There is something filling our Universe

•It doesn’t disturb gravity or electric force

•It does disturb weak force and make it short-ranged

•It slows down all elementary particles from speed of light

•What is it??•Extremely bizarre

theory!

Page 25: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

25

Cosmic Superconductor• In a superconductor, magnetic field gets repelled

(Meißner effect), and penetrates only over the “penetration length”

• ⇒ Magnetic field is short-ranged!

• Imagine a physicist living in a superconductor

•She finally figured:

•magnetic field must be long-ranged

• there must be a mysterious charge-two “Dark Field” in her “Universe”

•But doesn’t know what the Dark Field is, nor why it is there

•Doesn’t have enough energy (gap) to break up Cooper pairs

• That’s the stage where we are!

QuickTime™ and aIndependent JPEG Group decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 26: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

26

Kick out Dark Field from the vacuum

•We know the energy scale of the problem:

•0.3 TeV

•pump energy into empty space to kick out whatever makes Dark Field: “Higgs boson”

•LHC will find it!!!!!

Page 27: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

27

Better be sure•For something this bizarre, we’d better

make sure

•Is the particle discovered really the Higgs boson?

•Is it really responsible for particle masses?

•Does this have the right properties?

•Is it really stuck in our Universe?

•Need detailed measurements for the proof

Page 28: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

28

Post-Higgs Problem

•We see “what” is stuck in our universe

•But we still don’t know “why”

•Two problems:

Why anything is stuck at all

Why is the scale of Dark Field 0.3TeV much much smaller than the scale of gravity ~1015 TeV

•Explanation most likely to be at ≤TeV scale because this is the relevant energy scale

Page 29: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

29

Three Directions•History repeats itself•discovery of anti-matter doubled #particles•Double #particles again ⇒ supersymmetry

•Learn from Cooper pairs again•Cooper pairs composite made of two electrons•Higgs boson may be pairwise composite • ⇒ technicolor

•Physics as we know it ends at TeV•Ultimate scale of physics: quantum gravity•May have quantum gravity at TeV • ⇒ hidden dimensions (0.01 cm to 10–17 cm)

Page 30: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

30

•Higgs boson as a Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson (Little Higgs)

•Higgs boson as an extra-dimensional gauge boson (Gauge-Higgs Unification)

•Fat Higgs (Composite)

•Higgsless and W± as Kaluza-Klein boson

•technicolorful supersymmetry

More Directions

Page 31: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

31

Page 32: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

32

Task•Why is there Dark Field?

•We can eliminate many possibilities at LHC

•But new interpretations necessarily emerge

•Race will be on:

•theorists coming up with new interpretations

•experimentalists excluding new interpretations

⇒A loooong process of elimination

•Crucial information is in details

⇒Reconstruct the theory from measurements

Page 33: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

33

Need absolute confidence for a major

discovery

•still a long way to

•“Halliday-Resnick” level confidence

•“We have learned that all particles we observe have unique partners of different spin and statistics, called superpartners, that make our theory of elementary particles valid to small distances.”

As an example, supersymmetry

“New-York Times level” confidence

Page 34: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

inflation

unificationstringanti-matter

Page 35: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

InternationalLinear Collider

(ILC)

Page 36: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

36

ILC

•electron position collider at 0.5-1 TeV

•about 20 miles long•super-high-tech: nanometer beams

Page 37: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

37

ILC

•elementary particles

•well-defined energy, angular momentum

•uses its full energy

•can produce particles democratically

•can capture nearly full information

LHC

ILC

pp

e+ e-

Page 38: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

38

ILC•superconducting

cavities for main accelerator

•technology is extremely challenging, yet basically at hand

•world-wide design in development

•need to complete the design (a real work!)

Page 39: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

39

LHC vs ILC(oversimplified)

total energy 14TeV 0.5-1 TeV

usable energy a fraction full

beamproton

(composite)electron (point-

like)

signal rate high low

noise rate very high low

analysis specific modes nearly all modes

eventslose info along

the beamscapture the

whole

statusunder

constructionneeds to finish

design

Page 40: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

40

Take-home messages

•We are approaching a new layer of energy scale: something is brewing at TeV-scale

•Solutions to many deep puzzles hinge on what we find at this energy scale

•multiple tools needed to get a complete picture

Page 41: Linear Collider Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) EPP2010@SLAC, Jan 31, 2005.

41

In the Next Talk:•See how ILC, together with LHC

•can establish Higgs generates all masses

•can establish supersymmetry

•can test unification

•can figure out what Dark Matter is

•can study extra dimensions, measure their number, shape, geometry


Recommended