+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Linked List (Part I). Introduction Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and...

Linked List (Part I). Introduction Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and...

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: audra-reed
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
36
Linked List (Part I)
Transcript
Page 1: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Linked List (Part I)

Page 2: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:
Page 3: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Introduction

Weakness of storing an ordered list in array:Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are

expensive.○ Example:

Given an array which is arranged in ascending order.

○ Discuss how to insert a new element ‘1’ and how to delete the element ‘4’.

Storage allocation is not flexible.

2 4 6 7

Page 4: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Possible Improvements

The elements in an ordered list don’t need to be stored in consecutive memory space.The insertion and deletion of an element will

not induce excessive data movement.

The element can be “dynamically” allocated.

Page 5: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Linked Representation

Data structure for a linked list:

first

•Data•Link (pointer): used to store the address of the next node.

Node

Page 6: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Example

BAT 3 CAT 4 FAT 08

first

0

1

2

CAT 43

FAT 04

5

6

7

BAT 38

9

8

first

Page 7: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Insertion

BAT 3 CAT 4 FAT 08

first

0

1

2

CAT 43

FAT 04

5

6

7

BAT 38

9

8

first

Insert EAT into an ordered linked list

1) Get a new node a

2) Set the data field of a to EAT.3) Set the link field of a to point the node after CAT, which contains FAT.

Find the position where EAT is to be inserted.

EATEAT EATEAT

6 EAT6 EAT 46

EAT 4

CAT 6

CAT 63

4) Set the link field of the node containing CAT to a.

Page 8: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Deletion

BAT 3 CAT 6 EAT 48

first

1

2

CAT 63

FAT 04

5

EAT 46

7

BAT 38

9

8

first

Remove CAT from the linked list

1) Set the link of BAT to EAT.

2) Deallocate CAT

Find the address of CAT

FAT 0

BAT 68

BAT 6

3

Page 9: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Representation of a Linked List

class ListNode { friend class LinkedList; public: ListNode(); ListNode(DataField value); ~ListNode(); private: DataField data; ListNode *link;};

class LinkedList { private:

ListNode * first;};

first

class LinkedList { private: ListNode * first;};

class ListNode { friend class LinkedList; public: ListNode(); ListNode(DataField value); ~ListNode(); private: DataField data; ListNode *link;}; data link

Page 10: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:
Page 11: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Linked Ordered List Suppose elements are arranged in ascending

order. ADT

class LinkedOrderedList{

public: LinkedOrderedList(); ~ LinkedOrderedList(); void Insert(DataField value); bool Delete(DataField value); //return false if value is not

found. bool IsEmpty();private: ListNode *first;

};

Page 12: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Initialization The constructor of ListNode:

The constructor of LinkedOrderedList:

LinkedOrderList::LinkedOrderList(){ first = NULL;}

ListNode::ListNode(DataField value){ data = value; link = NULL;}

Page 13: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Algorithm of Insert()

01 void LinkedOrderList::Insert(DataField value)02 {03 curr = first;04 while (curr != NULL) 05 {06 if (curr->data >= value)07 {08 ListNode *a = new ListNode(value);09 a->link = curr;10 previous->link = a;11 break;12 }13 previous = curr;14 curr = curr->link;15 }16 }

Page 14: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Insertion

BAT 3 CAT 4 FAT 08

first

Insert EAT into an ordered linked list

currcurr curr

EATEAT 4

CAT 6

previous previous

03 curr = first;04 while (curr != NULL) 05 {06 if (curr->data >= value)07 {08 ListNode *a = new ListNode(value);09 a->link = curr;10 previous->link = a;11 break;12 }13 previous = curr;14 curr = curr->link;15 }

a

Page 15: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Boundary Condition: Case 1 Consider to insert AT.

There will be no previous node for AT.The update of first is required.

BAT CAT FAT

first

AT

Page 16: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Boundary Condition: Case 2 Consider to insert GAT.

BAT CAT FAT

first

GAT

03 curr = first;04 while (curr != NULL) 05 {06 if (curr->data >= value)07 {08 ListNode *a = new ListNode(value);09 a->link = curr;10 previous->link = a;11 break;12 }13 previous = curr;14 curr = curr->link;15 }

No statement is written to insert GAT at the end of the list.

Page 17: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Problem of Insert()

The function Insert() fails to deal with boundary conditions.The insertion is always performed between two

existing nodes.

ImprovementsAdd codes before- and after the while-statement

for dealing with the boundary conditions.Always maintain two (dummy) nodes so that

insertion can always be performed between two nodes.

Page 18: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Improvement Using Two Dummy Nodes Maintain two dummy nodes at each end

of the list.

class LinkedList { private: ListNode * first, *last;};

LinkedOrderList::LinkedOrderList(){ first = new ListNode(); last = new ListNode(); first->link = last; last->link = NULL;}

first last

No need to update the pointer first.

Boundary conditions are eliminated (Insertion and Deletion always take place between two nodes).

Page 19: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

New Version of Insert()

01 void LinkedOrderList::Insert(DataField value)02 {03 previous = first;04 curr = first->link;05 while (curr != NULL) 06 {07 if (curr == last || curr->data >= value)08 {09 ListNode *a = new ListNode(value);10 a->link = curr;11 previous->link = a;12 break;13 }14 previous = curr;15 curr = curr->link;16 }17 }

Page 20: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Algorithm of Delete()

01 bool LinkedOrderList::Delete(DataField value)02 {03 if (IsEmpty())04 return false;0506 previous = first;07 curr = first->link;08 while (curr != last) 09 {10 if (curr->data == value)11 {12 previous->link = curr->link;13 Deallocate curr;14 return true;15 }16 previous = curr;17 curr = curr->link;18 }19 return false;20 }

Page 21: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Deletion Consider to remove BAT from the list.

first last

BAT

10 if (curr->data == value)11 {12 previous->link = curr->link;13 Deallocate curr;14 return true;15 }

previous curr curr->link

Page 22: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Destruction of Nodes

Remember to deallocate each node in the destructor.

01 LinkedOrderList ::~ LinkedOrderList()02 {03 curr = first;04 while (curr != NULL) 05 {06 next = curr->link;07 Deallocate curr;08 curr = next;09 }10 }

Page 23: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Performance Analysis Suppose there are n nodes in a linked list.

Space complexity:○ A linked list uses an exact amount of memory space to

store these n nodes.○ Space complexity to perform a insertion or deletion

O(1).Time complexity to perform a insertion or deletion:

○ Consider a worst case in which nodes are always inserted and deleted at the end of the list. Therefore, the complexity is O(n).

○ Excessive request of allocation or deallocation of memory space for a node increases loading for the OS system (and may lower efficiency).

Page 24: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:
Page 25: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Linked Stack

B

A

C

E 0

data link

top Pop Pop

D

Push D

Page 26: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Linked Queue

Deletion takes place at front; insertion at rear.

B C D A E 0

front rear

Pop Pop Push E

Page 27: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Implementation of Linked Queue

LinkedQueue:: LinkedQueue(){ front = rear = NULL;};

bool LinkedQueue::IsEmpty(){ if (front is NULL and rear is NULL) return true; return false;}

Page 28: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Implementation of Linked Queue

void LinkedQueue::Push(Datafield value){ if (IsEmpty()) front = rear = new ListNode(value); else rear = rear->link = new ListNode(value);};

Datafield LinkedQueue::Pop(){ if (IsEmpty()) output error; else { delNode = front; value = front->data; front = front->link; deallocate delNode; return value; }};

LinkedQueue::~ LinkedQueue(){ while (!IsEmpty()) Pop();};

Page 29: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Comparison

Compare stack/queue implemented using array and linked stack/queue.

Array Linked list

Memory space The length of an array is fixed; Resize() is required if the stack is full.

Memory space can be dynamically allocated. The storage is more compact.

Execution time for Push() and Pop()

The time complexity is O(1).

The time complexity is also O(1). But the memory request increase overhead.

Page 30: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:
Page 31: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Polynomial Representation

class Polynomial { private: ListNode *first;};

first

class ListNode { friend class LinkedList; public: ListNode(int c, int e); ~ListNode(); private: int coef, exp; ListNode *link;};

3 2 1 0

f(x) =3x2+1

coef exp

Page 32: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Adding Polynomial

ExampleConsider the following two polynomials:

a(x) =3x14+2x8+1

b(x) =8x14-3x10+10x6

b.first

8 14 -3 10

bi

a.first

3 14 2 8

ai

1 00

10 06

Page 33: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Case 1

ai->exp == bi->exp

8 14 -3 10

bi

3 14 2 8

ai

1 00

C.first

11 014

Add coefficients and append to the result C.

Advance ai and bi to next term.

10 06

Page 34: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Case 2

ai->exp < bi->exp

8 14 -3 10

ai

3 14 2 8

bi

1 00

C.first

-3 010

Append the term indicated by bi to the result C.

Advance bi to next term.

11 14

10 06

Page 35: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Case 3

ai->exp > bi->exp

8 14 -3 10

bi

3 14 2 8

ai

1 00

C.first

-3 10

Append the term indicated by ai to the result C.

Advance ai to next term.

11 14

10 06

2 8 10 6 1 00

Page 36: Linked List (Part I). Introduction  Weakness of storing an ordered list in array: Insertion and deletion of arbitrary elements are expensive. ○ Example:

Algorithm of Add()LinkedPolynomial LinkedPolynomial::Add(Polynomial B){ Create a new LinkedPolynomial C as result; ai = first; bi = B.first; while (ai != NULL && bi != NULL) { if (ai->exp == bi->exp) { Sum = ai->coef + bi->coef; if (Sum != 0) C.InsertBack(Sum, ai->exp); ai = ai->link; bi = bi->link; } else if (ai->exp < bi->exp) { C.InsertBack(bi->coef, bi->exp); bi = bi->link; } else if (ai->exp > bi->exp) { C.InsertBack(ai->coef, ai->exp); ai = ai->link; } } for (; ai != NULL; ai = ai->link) C.InsertBack(ai->coef, ai->exp); for (; bi != NULL; bi = bi->link) C.InsertBack(bi->coef, bi->exp); return C;}


Recommended