+ All Categories
Home > Documents > LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr....

LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr....

Date post: 16-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 12 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry & Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany Copyright 2011 Dr Heiko Pult
Transcript
Page 1: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

LIPCOF:Evaluation and Classification

Dr. Heiko PultOptometry & Vision Research,

Weinheim, Gemany

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 2: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

LIPCOF 2 Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 3: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Definition:

LIPCOF are evaluated in the area perpendicular to the temporal and nasal limbus on the bulbar conjunctiva above the lower lid (temporal and nasal LIPCOF, respectively) with a slit-lamp microscope using 18–27 magnification as necessary – no fluorescein - and classified using the optimized grading scale. A further combined LIPCOF score (LIPCOF Sum) can be calculated by adding together the nasal LIPCOF grade and temporal LIPCOF grade. Care has to be taken to differentiate between parallel, permanent conjunctivalfolds (LIPCOF) and disrupted micro-folds

Pult H et al 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012 Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 4: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Orientation: Low magnification, project theslit-lamp beam to the limbus

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 5: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Orientation: Move down to the lower lidmargin

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 6: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Evaluation: Enlarge magnification to maximal 27x when classifying LIPCOF

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 7: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Evaluation: Regredient illumination by rotating the slit lamp beam to be parallel to the folds might enhance observation

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 8: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Important: Distinguish from micro-folds (a) and LIPCOF (b), the latter are parallel to the lid margin and its thickness mostly is 0.08mm (half of a normal tear meniscus height), while microfolds are 0.01mm. LIPCOF is a fold parallel to the lid margin!

a b

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 9: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Important: Observe temporal and nasal at defined area of observation

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 10: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Grading:

LIPCOF degree

No conjunctival folds 0

One permanent and clear parallel fold 1

Two permanent and clear parallel folds 2

More than two permanent and clear parallel folds 3

1

2

3

0

Pult H et al 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012 Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 11: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

Dry eye thresholds:

• Temporal LIPCOF ≥ 2• Nasal LIPCOF ≥ 2• LIPCOF Sum ≥ 2

– LIPCOF Sum = nasal LIPCOF + temporal LIPCOF

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 12: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

LIPCOF 1 Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 13: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

LIPCOF 2 Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 14: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

LIPCOF 3 Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t

Page 15: LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification - Heiko Pult · LIPCOF: Evaluation and Classification Dr. Heiko Pult Optometry& Vision Research, Weinheim, Gemany C op y r igh t 20 1 1 D r H

LIPCOF 0

Do not use vital dyes!

Fluorescein or Lissamine green misleads classification, e.g. highlighting micro-folds!

Cop

yrig

ht 2

011

Dr H

eiko

Pul

t


Recommended