Liquid Metal Walls
Francesco A. Volpe, S.M.H. (Taha) Mirhoseini
Dept. Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics
Columbia University, New York, USA
APAM Research Conference, November 11, 2016
Why study the MHD of liquid metals?
2
• Outer core of Earth is liquid Fe
• Geodynamo B protects life from Solar wind and cosmic rays
D.P. Lathrop, UMD
Some of the largest telescopes are made of rotating liquid metals
3
UBC/Laval LMT, 2.65 m, 1992
NASA-LMT,3 m, 1995-2002
LZT, 6 m, 2003-ILMT, 4 m, 2011 test
Adaptive optics with liquid mirrors?
4
Technological and medical applications of liquid metals
5
3D printingReconfigurable antennasTunable metamaterials
Flexible electronics
Nanomedicine
Metallurgical applications
6
Cast & flow control Recovery of precious & toxic spill
Refractory walls for furnaces?
Rockets?
Liquid metal walls
1. Reduce impurities and recycling[≪ 1mm thick, 1mm/s to 1cm/s]
7
Liquid metal walls
1. Reduce impurities and recycling[≪ 1mm thick, 1mm/s to 1cm/s]
“Thick” walls
2. Remove heat [~1m, 1mm/s(turbulent) to 1m/s (laminar)]
3. Attenuate neutrons [~1m, 1mm/s(turbulent) to 1m/s (laminar)]
4. Increase survivability to disruption
5. If rotating, they stabilize theplasma higher plasma b
[~1cm, >10m/s]
Here: [1-10 mm, 10-60 cm/s]
8
Liquid walls will tend to be uneven
• Instabilities
– Rayleigh-Taylor
• 1-100 cm, 13-130 ms
– Kelvin-Helmholtz
• >1 cm, ≫ 3 ms
• Turbulence
[Narula 2006]
9
Liquid walls will tend to be uneven
• Instabilities
– Rayleigh-Taylor
• 1-100 cm, 13-130 ms
– Kelvin-Helmholtz
• >1 cm, ≫ 3 ms
• Turbulence
• Non-uniform forces
– Non-axisymmetric “error” fields
– Inhomogeneous temperature inhomogeneous… • …resistance current TEMHD
• …viscosity shear-flow, convection
• …density convection
– Modes in plasma
[Narula 2006]
10
LM flows and becomes uneven under effect of time-varying non-uniform field, fast flow and solid wall roughness
13
Click to Play
Liquid walls will need to be stabilized
Otherwise, they could
1. “bulge” and interact with plasma
– Contaminate it
– Cool it
– Act as limiter
– Disrupt it
2. “deplete” and expose substrate to heat and neutrons, and plasma to less benign plasma-facing material
– Increased sputtering, erosion, recycling, Tritium retention…
12
Of forces considered, only jxB are rapidly, locally adjustable
To sustain the flow:
• Gravity
• Electromagnetic forces
• Magnetic propulsion (𝛻𝐵𝑇)
• Thermoelectric drive (𝛻𝑇)
For adhesion to substrate:
• Capillary forces
• Electromagnetic forces
• Centrifugal
13[Abdou, 2001]
Outline
• Passive stabilization (B only)
• Active stabilization (jxB)
• Feedback stabilization
14
Outline
• Passive stabilization (B only)
• Active stabilization (jxB)
• Feedback stabilization
15
• CNC-machined from single block
• Duct of constant area but variable shape
16
Permanent magnets
Ferromagnetic core
PLA plastic, 3D printed
S
N
N
N
N
S
S
S
“Frozen-in” field from rotating permanent magnets propels liquid metal
Slots for Fe laminations
Free-surface flow in tiltable “tile” exposed to B
Slot for electrodes
Pivot. Inclination can be varied (floor, wall, ceiling)
B from external coil
17
Strong B is stabilizing, even in absence of j
18
𝐵 = 0 T 𝐵 = 0.4 T
𝐵
𝑢 ≈ 0.2 [𝑚/𝑠]
Navier-Stokes and generalized Ohm’s law𝜕𝐯
𝜕𝑡+ 𝐯 ∙ 𝛻 𝐯 = −
1
𝜌𝛻𝑝 + 𝜈𝛻2𝐯 + 𝑔 +
1
𝜌(𝐣 × 𝐁)
𝐣 = 𝜎 𝐄 + 𝐯 × 𝐁
Contain a stabilizing term 𝜎
𝜌(𝐯 × 𝐁) × 𝐁 of order 𝜎𝑈𝐵2 𝜌
19
Strong B is stabilizing
Navier-Stokes and generalized Ohm’s law𝜕𝐯
𝜕𝑡+ 𝐯 ∙ 𝛻 𝐯 = −
1
𝜌𝛻𝑝 + 𝜈𝛻2𝐯 + 𝑔 +
1
𝜌(𝐣 × 𝐁)
𝐣 = 𝜎 𝐄 + 𝐯 × 𝐁
Contain a stabilizing term 𝜎
𝜌(𝐯 × 𝐁) × 𝐁 of order 𝜎𝑈𝐵2 𝜌
that dominates over convective term 𝐯 ∙ 𝛻 𝐯 (ratio=44 in our exp)
and over viscous term 𝜈𝛻2𝐯 (𝐻𝑎 = 𝐵𝐿 𝜎 𝜇 = 7 ∙ 104).
20
Strong B is stabilizing
Simplified Navier-Stokes𝜕𝐯
𝜕𝑡= −
1
𝜌𝛻𝑝
pump,thermoel. drive,
magn. propulsion…
+ 𝑔gravity
+𝜎
𝜌(𝐯 × 𝐁) × 𝐁
effectiveviscous drag
𝛿𝑣⊥Ohm
𝛿𝑗⊥ = 𝜎𝐵𝛿𝑣⊥Lorentz
𝛿𝐹⊥ = −𝜎𝐵2𝛿𝑣⊥/𝑛
Incompressibility 𝛻 ∙ 𝐯 = 0 → 𝛿𝑣∥ also small
21
Velocity fluctuations are damped by effective viscous drag ∝ 𝐵2
Outline
• Passive stabilization (B only)
• Active stabilization (jxB)
• Feedback stabilization
22
jxB acts as effective gravity, stabilizing
23
I=60 AB=0 T
I=60 AB≈0.2 T
I=60 AB≈0.4 T
jxB acts as effective gravity, stabilizing
24
I=120 AB=0 T
I=120 AB≈0.2 T
I=120 AB≈0.4 T
Broader coverage of substrate?
Outline
• Passive stabilization (B only)
• Active stabilization (jxB)
• Feedback stabilization
25
For Lithium and 𝐵 = 5 T,𝑗 = 0.1 A/cm2 suffices to defy gravity
Could be induced by modes in plasma applied currents might need to be adjusted in f/back with thickness
Feedback control by array of electrodes will enforce uniform thickness under more challenging circumstances
26
+ −𝑉
𝛿𝛿
27
+ −𝑉
𝛿𝛿
Similar to feedback control of plasma instabilities by coil arrays
Feedback control by array of electrodes will enforce uniform thickness under more challenging circumstances
jxB actuator pushes LM
I = 0 A I = 100 A
I = 200 A
0 100
ON
OFF
DC Current Generator
Liquid Metal
Elec
tro
de
-
B
Shunt Resistor
V+−
Ru
ler
Elec
tro
de
+
Original LM surface
28
Local deformation is linear with applied current
29
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 50 100 150 200
Surf
ace
Leve
l Dec
reas
e (
cm)
Applied DC Current (A)
Offset due to surface tension
Same plate electrodes used for actuatorssucceeded as resistive sensors of LM thickness
30
Same electrodes as sensors and actuators:Imposing uniform resistance = imposing uniform thickness!
Measurements of LM thickness were extended to a matrix of pin-electrodes
31
Current Terminals
Current Terminals
PlasticPot
Electrodes
VoltageTerminals
12
3
45
6
7
89
10
1112
Measurements of LM thickness were extended to a matrix of pin-electrodes
32
Kirchhoff + generalized Ohm mxn equations to extract height in each electrode
• Where
• Can be rearranged as 𝐈 = 𝐀𝐡 and inverted: 𝐡 = 𝐀−1𝐈
33
Finite poloidal or toroidal vxB introduce need for coupling with v and B diagnostics
• But in our case 𝐯 × 𝐁 ≪ 𝐸
• Also, if 𝑣𝑅 = 𝐵𝑅 = 0, then 𝐯 × 𝐁 𝜙 = 𝐯 × 𝐁 𝜃 = 0 no
perturbation to 𝐸𝜙 and 𝐸𝜃
34
Measurements of LM thickness were extended to a matrix of pin-electrodes, simultaneously
35
~10 ms time-resolution and ±0.5 mm precision were achieved
36
“Shaker” &
Fast camera images
Waves are non-linear, due to shallow liquid and large lat. oscillation
±0.5 mm noise
Videos & papers
• http://pl.apam.columbia.edu
• Videos:– Go to and search for ‘Volpe Group’
• Papers:– Sensors and actuators: PPCF 58, 124005 (2016)
– Latest on sensors: RSI 87, 11D427 (2016)
– Passive and active stabilization: Magnetohydr., submitted (2016)
37
Summary & Conclusions
38
• Liquid metal walls need to be stabilized
• Was stabilized
– Passively, by strong B
• Effective viscosity
– Actively, by applied jxB
• Effective gravity
• Will be stabilized
– By jxB optimized in real-time, in feedback with measurements of LM thickness
• Sensors and actuators
Ongoing and future work: put it all together! (sensors, actuators, flow, floor, wall, ceiling)
39
Flow adhering to “ceiling” (q =145o)
Cylindrical wall, 90 cm long
Galinstan
40
Melting elements by a resistive furnace in lab to produce Galinstan; a) Tin, b) Indium, c) Gallium and d) Galinstan
(b)(a) (c) (d)
Alloy Galinstan (Ga, In, Sn) Lithium Tin
Density 6400 [kg/cm3] 5300 [kg/cm3] 7000[kg/cm3]
Melting Point -19oC 181oC 232oC
Electrical Conductivity 17% of Copper’s 16% of Copper’s 14% of Copper’s
Toxicity Low Low Low
Corrosivity Very high (corrodes all the metals) Very high Low
New stainless steel pump with Fe laminations expected to yield faster flows, for centrifugal exp.
41
AC Motor Drive
AC Motor
Electromagnetic Pump
EPDM Pipes
Initial test at low speed
Other sensors: LIDAR, Ultrasound and Infra-red
44
LIDAR
Might not work on shiny surface
Expensive
[Photo: Keyence]
Ultrasound
Liquid metal
1D measurement
4D ultrasound medical imaging?
Stereo 3D IR-camera
• Resolution: 1200 x 1000 pixels• Frames: 30 fps