--° cc- (-tk bsy kh.

S€: AJL

ifi4TS3

Final E aluat ion:J &1-r+. IliIb,j4.1piJ

Reviewers same:p —-

Authors Name: shii 4.froqC)

Referee Report Rubric7L,L ot1(’y

Paper Title: 15 eF oi-

,______________________________________________________

F Poor OK Good SuperTitle and AbstractIntroduction

Clear statement of research question I

Literature Review IContent of lit reviewVOrganization of lit review

./__ —Citation usage and styleVTheoretical Analysis (may he in lit review section) IDiscussion of underlying theory

Empirical AnalysisThe_Data

Variable Description and Summary Data Table /Description of procedure for data collection: Data limitations and problems ooy-

Empirical ResultsDiscussion_of DGP’error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression results table

-‘7Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting Results

Explanation of a particular coefficientIIf Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities

1nr:’T it’ ‘

Appropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion of violations of CEM

Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocon’elationLse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence inter\ al on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)Comparison of resubs to previous work ( from lit review) :

—__________________Answering the research questi onConclusion

Summary of paperFuture work

References: Content and StyleOverall ASPeCtS of the Paper

ContentWritingStyle (fiures, tables. look and feel)

Best Parts of the Paper: Things [hat Need Work:

6 V’A’( (C C C-•

Referee Report Rubric

Author’s Name: ‘;

Title and Abstract AA-

______________________________________________________ F Poor OK Good Super

Paper Title:

L&ppropriate functional forms used and explained

IntroductionClear_statementof research_question_i s__kLiterature_ReviewContent_of lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and svIe

VLTheoretical Analysis (may he in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy

Empirical Analysis• The Data

Variable Description and Summaiy Data Table VDescription of procedure for data collectionData limitations and problems

Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)

—Regression results table /,cVRounding_numbers_and_ease_hf reading_display

Inteireting Results \ -, (Explanation of a particular êoefficient

\/If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities 1 VTnn1,,rnn ,,,,tc 4,, r,cr. ,c4n,,“D

“

IDiscussion of violations of CEM Ai- :, L____ VTesting for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelationUse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis_rest_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)Comparison of results to previous work (from lit rev ie\4)Answering the research queslion

Conclusion:‘‘ d AI

Sumniaty of paper-Future work

References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper

ContentWrit in

‘ Sr Ic (ttures, tables, look and feel)VBest Parts of the Paper:

/rr rç ‘,I CA

) L1vc’.Av( fQIJl ‘J

Things That Need Work:I. Cic C (LCM (.1.’( V .t ‘

2

Final E alum ion: Reviewer’s Name:

Referee Report Rubric

4

O

p.

-‘,-.4

Author’s Name: 1voi. Mñ+c.hav

Title and AbstractF Poor, OK’

Paper Title: ‘: k L’Good TsupiJ

______________

C .-f

:

IntroductionClear statement of research question

Literature ReviewContent_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation_usage_and_style

Theoietical_Analysis_(may_be_in_lit_ieview_section)Discussion of underlying theoiy

Empirical_Analysis

Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableN/Description_of procedure_for_data_collection

Data limitations and problemsEmpirical Results

Discussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table

Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting_Results

Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientIf Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities

inflhl1.”Br.- ,nf 1i ,,rC.,,cc-:n,, C

Apprqpriate functional fonns used and explainedDiscussion of violations of CEM

Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationUse_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasricity_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(ifappjicable)Discussion of economic importance

Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable’)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Ans_ering_the_research_question

ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work

References: Content and StyleO Cl till speLts of the Papei

(.ontent\“vntlng

Style (flutures. tables. look and feel)Best Parts of the Paper

fri‘

frL

Thints That Need Work:

Referee Report Rubric

Author’s Name: —

Final Evaluation:

Paper Title:

\Z

Rev ie wer s Name: I .Y-t-t -c )‘

.

-- IF Poor OK Good SuperTitle and AbstractIntroduction

Clear_statement_of research_questionLiterature Review

Content_of lit_reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation usane and style

Theoretical Analysis (may he in lit review section)Discussion_of underlying_theoiy

Empirical Analysis / .

The DataVariable_Description_and_Summaiy_Data_TableDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData_limitations_and_problems

Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs) v7

Regression results tableRounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_display

Interpreting Results SIExplanation of a particular coefficient SI

If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities 1Including units in discussion of variables tAppropriate functional fonns used and explained -JDiscussion of violations of CEM S..,’

Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelation[se_of robust_SEs_(ifheteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable) SIConfidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(ifapplicable)Discussion_of_economic_importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) VComparison of results to previous work ( from lit review) ‘IAnswerinu the research question

Conclusion 7Summary_of paperFuture work

References:_Content_and_Style-

JO\Llall ‘\spects ot the Papei —‘

ContentWritingStyle (uures. tables, look and feel) 1

Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:

Referee Report Rubric

‘ TIntroductionClear statement of research question -1

Literature ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usae and style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy

—

Empirical AnalysisThe_Data

Variable_Description_and_Summaiy_Data_TableDescription of procedure for data collection JData limitations and problems —

Empirical ResultsDiscussion_of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression results table ‘V

Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting Results

Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientIf Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities

Including_units_in_discussion_of_variablesAppropriate_functional_forms_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM

Testing_for_h eterosk edasticity_or_autocorrelationTi se_of robust_SEs_(if lieteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review)Answermg_the_research_question

, ConclusionSummaiy of paperFuture work

References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper

ContentWritingStyle (tgures, tables, look and ftel)

Best Parts of the Paper: . Things That Need Work:

Author’ s Name: Paner Title:@ F Poor OK Good SuperTitle and Abstract

______ ______ ______ ______

‘/

Final Evaluation: Review er’s Name: — a

Referee Report Rubric

Author’s Name:5COfcQe)/

Title and Abstract

______________________

Introduction

______ __________________________

Clear statement of research questionLiterature Review

Content of lit reviewOrganization of lit review

_____________________

Citation usage and styleTheoretical Analysis (may hem lit review section

Discussion of underlying_theory

________

Empirical AnalysisThe Data

_____________

Variable_I)escription and Summary Data TableDescription of procedure for data collectionData limitations and problems

Empirical Results

__________ _____________

Discussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table

Rounding numbers and ease of reading displa’Interpreting Results

Explanation of a particular coefficientIf Dummy I)ependent Variable, predi

Including_units in discussion of variablesAppropriate functional forms used and cxiDiscussion of violations of C EM

Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrel ation

Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity presenFI lvpothesis test on estimated coefficient (ifConfidence interval on estimated coefficient (ifDiscussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicableComparison ol resuhs to previous work (from lit reviewAnswering the research question

ConclusionSummary of paper

__________________________________

Future workReferences: Content and Sty IcOverall_Aspects of the Paper__________

ContentWriting

_____________

Style (figures, tables, look and feel)Best Parts of the Paper: hings l’hat Need Work:

Oç--t tk’ v1/qr(Pc)4hd$)

c C 1 J -‘ ceq.Final Evaluation: DL- Reviewcr’s Name:

________

.

—

cc‘S.

0 CD

I)

(-)

0 C)

C,’ 0

- CD C,

c-f)

0 LI

CD

c-)

CD CM C,

CD CD Cl) 0 CD LI

Ct’

CD (D CD cl-C 0 CD C (1)

CD

i-f)

Ct’

CD (ID CD CM 0 CD CD

H LI

CD -t

Z)

—C

CM --C (1 C (t Cl,

CD -J 0 CD CM C 0

LI

-J

LI

C)

CD Cl)

CM

-t

CD LI

(CC

CD Cl)

C-

Cl)

Cl) CD Cl)

CM C) C -“-C

CD CD C) -C C C’

:

LI

-C CD CD

CD J Ct

Cr)

CM C CD CM C CM C,-

CD

‘7j

C,

CD > CM CM

Cl) CD Cl)

CM 0 C C C C Cl) 0 C-)

LI

C 0.

C-

C) 0 -

C

H CD z C 0 CM CD

CD C I— ( CD --C CD

C C -J

CM -C LI o C,-

CD CM

-I DC)

DC)

C 0 C,

C C-C DC)

LI)

CD C CD 0 CD CD CD -C C-

C)

J)

(.1)

C’-

’

(‘C

’)

C.)

Cl)

Cl; C) C) C-C

CD)

CD C/c

0 LI

CD C l)

C C --C CD -I-

C DC)

C Cl) DC)

CD DC)

C-

Cl)

C -C- CD

CM CD C CM -t Cl) rti C

l)

-4)

CD CD CM CD C-’

DC)

CM CD LI

C Cl) CD -C C-

C DC)

Cl) C C 4’J

C Cl) Cl;

C LI

C -C C Cr.

‘I CD CD -C’

C LI

DC)

C LI

DC)

C-

CD LI

DC)

DC’)

C C LI 0 C-)

CD C!) C)

C— -4

-)

LI

LI

CD DC)

—C

CD

0 DC)

LI N DC)

C C LI C C-

CD -C’

CD

Cl)

CD Cl)

CM C C -4)

C-

LI C-)

CD LI

-I CD 0

-C C-

CD CM CM CD CM C-.

C CD C,,

C DC)

C-

CD C CD 0 CD C)

CD C-.

-i-C

DC)

CD DC)

C,-

CD-C

’

C C,

LI

DC)’

CD LI

CD C.

C DC)

-4)

C LI

Cl)

CM CrC C C-

CD C,

DC)

CD

H CD CM C-.

LI

-4)

CD C-

CD o Cl)

—‘C CD 0 CM C-. CD DC)

C CD C 1 CD DC)

C

C C-

CD CD CD LI

‘-C

CD DC)

C LI

CD Cl)

C-

LI

,2 DC

)C

-CD C CD C C

t

CD CD Ct

-4)

DC)

LI

LI CD DC)

C,-

CD

CC)

-r

C-I

DC)

‘i-C

I -4)

LI

CD - DC)

LI

CD I a r

C C 0 LI

C-’ C,

CD CM DC)

LI C-

CD DC)

CM CD C C-4

)

C DC)

C C-

Cl) LI

DC)

C-

CD CM CD LI C C C-)

LI

CD CD C-

CD C DC)

-t

DC)

CD C CD CD C

DC DC)

C,-

CD 0 CD (I,

CD cC,

C.

C (ID

C-

LI

LI

DC) C DC)

DC) H DC)

C-

CD

C -4)

C C, CD LI

CD LI

C-

CD C DC)

C,-

CD C C C-

CD C-

CD C-

C,

C,

DC)

C,

C-.

CD Cl)

CD CM CD C, CD LI

C C -C’)

C Cl) CD DC)

C C C CD CM C C,

H C,-

CD C CD ‘--C CD DC

)

LI DC)

CM CM DC)

C-

CD LI

C C C-

CD Cl)

CD CD C-

0 LI

0 CM CD CM CM C C 0 C 0 C.

CD LI

LI

LI 9 DC DC)

LI

C- 0 -C CM

CD -C CD CM z DC

)

CD

-C C C Cl; z DC)

CD DC)

CD H CD

LI

C

-n 0 C

LrE

0

Tr’.e_ Recr’J— etJ‘u -- -i-k;s

—

Author’s Narne:jc,cpt v

Title and Abstract

Referee Report Rubric

Paper Title: A F. F Poor OK Good Super

d

.-

r IntroductionClear statement of research question

Literature ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation usage and style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theory

—

Empirical AnalysisThe Data

Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_Table: Description of procedure for data collection

Data limitations and problemsEmpirical Results

Discussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table ><

Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting Results

Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientif Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities 2<

Including units in discussion cf variablesAppropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion_of violations_of C’EM

Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation >Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present) >K.Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion_of economic_importanceComputation_and_explanation_of elasticity_(it’ applicable)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Answering the research question X

ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work

References: Content and Style “>(Overall_Aspects_of the_Paper

ContentWriting —

Style (figures, tables, look and feel) ‘KBest Parts of the Paper: Things That >eed Work:

x

rn.f, Lr. iH)( 1-, cZo’r’(.S

iA sç’c iy,CQ. )r.

Final Evaluation: C Reviewer’s Name: JoeL Wh 1fon

:

00 CD 0

1 CD 0 7—

(-I)

0 CD

CD -4-

CD C -J

CD C,) 0 CD -J 0-

(ID

CD

CD C Cl;

CD 1J 0 0 7-

CD

Lf

CD ‘-4

(D C Cl) CD 0 I— CD Cl)

-4-

CD C ‘-4-

jc CD Cl) Cl)

m C)

CD Cl)

C,)

Cl) C)

Cl)

Cl) C C CD C) C 2 C -J C)

C) CD

CD C Cl)

Cl)

C Cl) Cl)

CD

Cl) C)

Cl)

C,) 0 C -4-)

0 -t 0•

Cl) C m

m C) > DC)

C’) Cl)

n -4 C) C -J

C CD L •1

rt

CD -4-

CD CD CD

-I-i

—a

DC) m C CD CD -C CD C

l) / CD

DC)

‘-4-

DC)

-a DC

)

C -J

Cl) DC

)-a 0-

C-

CD --a

-J Cl)

C DC)

Cl) C C CF)

C If)

rt C C Cl)

-a

-a 0 C -a CD

(1 0-

Cr) (,) 0 C)

-4-)

DC5 a (P C,”)

ri-i

C-a

-J DC

)

0 C -4-J DC

)

C-a

DC)

C)

-4 C) C CD C)

CD 0 -4

C C -t DCa)

C ‘-S 0-

CD >: C DC)

—a

DC)

C —a C (P i--a)

Cl)

-4 C-)

-‘))

DC)

C ‘—a

CD 0 C-

(—)

DC)

C -J

Cl) p.)

CD DC-)

-S 0-

Cl) CD

If)

CD C —4--

a

C Cl) (ID ri-

i

4)

(P CD Cl) 5-

(P 0-

DaD

Cl) C-)

U CD If)

CD —a

d rt -a CD Cl)

C’) (tI

Cl) C CD C,)

-4

-S DC

)CD 0-

C) 0 CD -4-a

C-)

(P ‘-4-

-4-)

--a

‘--a C-) p.)

CD

H CD Cl)

Jc CD -4 CD If) 5-

(P 0-

Cl) C-)

DC)

C -t C C-)

rt5 pa)

-4 C -S

> U-a C c-a

0 CD —-a

C)

-t C C DC)

--a

Ii)

Cl) CD ‘-N 0-

CD x DC)

CD 0-

C --a 0-

CD C)

CD I- CD i-as

C CD Cf-a CD 0-

C-)

C CD -4--

a

C-)

CD -J DC

)C C C

) C-a

CD U—

CD)

Cd-, -C If --a

CD i-a)

c-A (I;; H (3

D CII H 0 / CD (El

0-

C

C 0-

-S JC -J C-

CD (‘as DC

)

0-

CD DC)

Cl) CD C -s--

a

p.) p.

0-

Cl)

c-a

DC)

-a

CD Cl) C)

--a -4-

C C -4--

a

-J C)

CD 0-

-a CD - 0-a

DC)

i--a)

C) C CD C-)

-4-

0 -e

p.) C-

CD CD Cl) C) C C -J 0 (ID --a

-S -a --a

pa)

‘-4-

p.) H DC)

C-

CD

-fr-

a

—S

a-a

—a

CD c-A CD 0-a

CD DC DC)

C-

CD C C 01-a

CD CD 0-

C C-a

i-a)

C -4-

- ci’

CD DC Cl)

p.)

CD CD C I-f)

Cl) CD p.)

C 0 CD Cl’) C C

Cl) C-)

Cl)

Cl)

C C -4)

CD C -t (P --a

-J

-J 2 (-) C DC)

C —a

-J > Cl)

-)

-J CD C C —4-

-

C)

p.)

-J p.)

Cl)

Cl)

p.)

C-

CD —a

-t

C -a CD Cl) CD C)

r-f

C

0 p.P

a)

--a

N C -J C -4-)

C —a CD

C’

H -J CD p.)

-4-

p.)

L.

‘I’

0 C CD ‘-4

-

0 -4-)

rt CD 1!

Cl) C-)

a— Cl)

Cl)

0 -J C -4--

a

-J 0-

Ct

-S SQ 1-4

-

-S CD C a

I. DC)

‘--a CD H I-f

CD

C ‘-a

—---

4-

CC

0.

0

,;_yo 7-

i

-—

------—

—-—

-u

Referee Report Rubric

\j

- d a I I L I. a -

Author’s Name: x Paner Title: +-- F Poor OK Good Super

Title and AbstractIntroduction

Clear statement of research question 4Literature Review L

Content_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy

Empirical AnalysisThe Data

—

Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData_limitations_and_problems

Empirical_ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs) /Regression_results_table

Rounding numbers and ease of reading display 7—Interpreting Results

Explanation of a paiicular coefficient c.If Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities

Including unhs in di5cusion of variablesAppropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM

Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelationLse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_( if applicable)Discussion_of_economic_importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity ( if applicable)Comparison of results to previous work (from lit re iew)Answering_the_research_question

ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work

References: Content and Style—

Overall L\spects of the Paper —ContentWritingStyle (figures. tables, look and feel)

• Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:

Final Evaluation: 0 Revie\ver’s Name:

1— Referee Report Rubric

Paper Title:

Reviewer’s Name: oft/’.//

Author’s Name: 5ky fr’F Poor OK Good Super

Title and AbstractIntroduction

Clear statement of research_questionLiterature Review

Content_of lit_reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation_usage_and_style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying_theory

Empirical AnalysisThe Data

Variable_Description_and_Summary_Darn_TableDescription of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems

Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM or Random_Xs)Regression results table

Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting_Results

Explanation of a particular coefficient

Including units in discussion of variablesAppropriate functional forms used and explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM

Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation ‘y -______

Use_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasticily_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable) yDiscussion of economic_importanceComputation_and_explanation_of elasticity_(if applicable)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Answering_the research_question

ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work

References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper

ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables, look and feel)

L

Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:(9(€$ o-P 4iri.i (tfii-ewf

)I’.A.

Final Evaluation:

ji! ,.; fl4L(/7Lf’t4/A

,iJuL 1-’f

(ovL/LAeP

- I

Ye,i/ MPi(e/ 1U.1 ,‘i A)euL 1-”

Authors Name: S&,IJ

Referee Report Rubric

Tit1e and Abstract

Paper Title:F Poor OK Good Super

IntroductionClear statement of research question I

Literature_ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization of lit reviewCitation usage and style V

‘ Theoietical Analysis (may he in lit ie iew section)

Discussion of underlymg theoiy

Empirical_AnalysisThe Data

Variable Description and Summary Data Table

Description_of procedure_for_data_collection

Data_limitations_and_problems

Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)

Regression_results_tableRounding_numbers_and_ease_of_reading_display

lnteireting_ResultsExplanation_of a_particular_coefficient

If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities

Including units in discussion of variables

Appropriate functional forms used and explained-j

Discussion of violations of CEM

Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation

Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present) -LHypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)

Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)

Discussion of economic importance

Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable)

Comparison of results to previous work from lit review)

Answerin the research question

ConclusionSummary of paperFuture work

References: Content and Style

Overall Aspects of the Paper

ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables, look and fel)

Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:

.:

.C -J

CM C

C

,‘,3

_

--:

C’

-J (1)

-J

-3

-4.

C (2 -3 CD

0 C:’

CD CD Cf C’

em)

CD -3 CD

CD Ct

4’ C (‘C CD CM 0’

CD C,-,

— CD

—3

C:’

CD Cr, C3 (‘C Lf( C C’

C em CV

CD

H -J CD

> CM (1 —3

CD CM (0 C (0 Li., em C

em CD (0 -t

CD CM CM

ri -3

-J

-3 CD C CD Li,

CM

-4C

,—

T..

C-.

V

-

- •,-

.41

— C)

V., C C

/C CM C.

-3 C -C)

CD C:-)

C -3 C C:-)

C C C:)

CD

CD (t (‘C (‘C C -4

Cl)

em CM C CD

ii CD C C CM CM

CM CD CM CM C C -4 0 C C:)

CM C em

)

c-fl

-J em em em CD -f C -J

C H CD —4

03

C CM C CD C-f

C C C C’

C C--’

CD CD C Ct’

CD CD -4 -t

CD C em CD CD 3- CD

C m 3- C em 0 CD CD (0 Cl

)

C CD

(I)

CD C em)

C3 CM (1)

CM em)

CD -t CD CM C’=

C CM em CD C C/C CD

C em C C-f C CM C 0-

C-) C-

CD -3 CM

C)

j.: 03

IC C-‘C

Ci,

C.”) C:)

C-.) em

)

C-

C:0

CI)

C CD 0 em)

CD -3

3-

()

C -3 CM C JQ CD PC)

C 0-

CM CD

C C C CM --3 C’

—4

(0 CM CM C C CD -3 C’

CM 3- C em

)

C —4 CD CD -

4

C-.)

C C-)

em C em C PC)

0 CD x C--,

-3 C em C C (0 C CM CD —4

C C-)

CD PC)

CD

C -3 N C C --3 C --4

( 3- CD

H CD CM -4 C -J CD rt CD C,) (0 03

C CM em CD —4

C C em C CD C -4 CD PC)

C-f C -4

C C -3 CD CD em C PC)

-3 CM CM CD 0-

-4 C-

CD C-) DC

)

C CD 0-

Cl)

CD C-

CM Cl) C C C -4 03

CD -‘PC

C-f

-4 CD 0 -J

C C C-f

1 (0 CM CM CD CM rt C CD CM em -3 C C-f CD CD C (U CD CD -

4

—3

C C C CD C-

CD

C Ci

0- (0 CD CD -C CD -4 PC

)

C CD CM -4 C CD em CD C CD CD CD C C CD PC)

C-

CD

CD CM -w CM C CD PC)

CL

DID CM H PC

) z CD (0 0-

C

CD CM CD C em C C C-)

C CD CD 0-

CD d. C PC)

CD 0 CD CD C-f C -3

C C 0-

--3

-‘C -3 C-

CD CM PC)

0-

CD C CM CD C C U’)

0-

‘PC 0-

C)) C C

C C-

CD CD CM CD -4 em 0 C em L/D

C em C H C-

CD

C-)

em -4

-3

-4 CD ‘-3 CD 0 CD C-f

PC C C-

CD C C 0-

CD -t

CD 0 —-4 d C PC)

C-

CD CM

CD CM em CD -3 (0 2 C CM CD CD 0 em (IC CM C -3

CM CD em CM CM C -4 C 0 -3.-

(r C-f

CD ‘-C CD C-.

)

C C —4 0-

C -3 >< CM

H -3 CD C CD PC)

PC)

CM CM -4 C3 CD --3 CD Li)

CD CD em C.

-4

3)

‘C

-4.—

‘C:. --

p-’

—3

;C

9- ?I’ -

£

C_C

‘,

—C

•-2

-

-DC

‘-4

-.

;5,

-:

.?..

-:t

)C’

—-

.4’-

DC -.4

z0

‘—

“-,

em C CM z C C CD c3 .2 5

-2 -7 .

-1

-w PC)

C CD H CD

9

‘-4

‘S

‘c_

c

C)j

c-w C C

;

2

.4.4

-.c

,..

,c

3)

L

—V

. -9

0 0 0 C C if,

C j CD -tS

1-1-

;‘3.13I\

-

4*

-‘c

,—‘-

4,(’

.:c-

-c-’

2,

Ct’

Referee Report Rubric

F Poor OK Good SuperTitle and AbstractIntroduction

Clear statement of research question o{Liteiatwe Re iev

Content_of lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discuss ion of underlying theory

Empirical AnalysisTheData

Variable Description and Sumrnaiy Data Table VDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData limitations and problems —

Empirical Results : —

Discussion_of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression_results_table

Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayterpreting_Results

Explanation_of a_particular_coefficientif Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities

Including_units_in_discussion_of_variablesAppropriate_functional_form s_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM

Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationLse_of robust_SEs_( if heteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable) —

Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) - —

Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review) —

Answering the research questionConclusion

Summary_of paperFuture_work

References:_Content_and_StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper

ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables, look and feel)

Best Parts of the Paper:0c

.

Author’s Name: Lrry G1fe1J Paper Title:

eA w5

Things That \eed Work:

Final Evaluation: Reviewers Name: iJ n’w-V

VCC,)

\L

I.

C)\

C)

cD0

--—

-—

-‘

SI

C)C

)c1

l\

z©I-’

CID)

4-

LI

Hci)C)C

e

0S..)Ce

z(ID

0

1”C0-a(IDa)CCe

ci)(ID9)C)4-.)

ci)

LI4

-’C

e4-’

(IDCeci)

c-)

ci)

-DCe

HCe

4-a

Ce

Ce

Cl)

-C)Ce

-o4-a

4..LI(IDci)

ci)-C

)Ce

>

CC)

LIci)(IDci)

9)4—

ci)-C

)>Ce

4-

(ID(IDCe

4-

LI9)C)LI

H

(ID1LI

CeC)

wUci)

CLI)04--

C)(ID(IDC-)(ID

0

ci)

zCI,

a)

ci)>ci)

0CC

UiCe

(IDci)

-C)Ce

24-

-C)LI

4-’

LI

-C)9)4..

ci)-C

)Ce

4—4-

ci)‘ILIci)

4-

I4-

C)0

.5•1

4-.)

LI

4-a

(ID-C

)

-C)Ceci)

4-a

F-

4-

C)C-)

ci)

C)C)

Ce

-C)

(

ci)

-C)II)C

-)C)I-C)C)C0C)(IDci)

0

CeC)(IDCf4-

-ci,C

e9)C)ci)(IDCCci)

-C)Ce

LI

C’

-C)

‘S

.

\5

-

S

-S

‘-S

‘5k-

“

4’

5-

)N

4..

H:‘4

C-)“‘

ci’

C

C

—5-

(I)

(ID

-e4-

CCci)C’C

e(ID4

-

0U

C)5-.)

ci)ci)

/LIDCI)

ci)C)..

‘Li

4-a

C)(ID

CC(I)ci)

a)

-C)CCC)

4—4-CC

5—ci)

LI

4-

1)C)LI

ci.)

CC

4—.

(IDci)

C)CC4--

ci)4-

ci)L

I

ci)-C

)

‘C)U

)

-C)ci)

4-

CC4-

I)

-C)CC5)

ci)(ID(ID4

-

‘C)

-4-

CCC)LI

4-

ci)

Ce

C)C)4-

C)ci)4

.a

4-

ci)-C

)4-

-a

(4-

0C)(ID4IDC)

(ID

0

4--

C)Ceci)

C)LI

C)4

-a

Ce

C)C-)

(IDCe-eLI‘I

(IDC)ci)4

.-a

ci)IC

l4-

4-’

(IDci)H

ci.)-C

)LI

C)4-

Ce(4

-

-aci)

LI

C-aci)C)L

I

-C)ci)

-aCC4-

LIDci)C)(IDci)4

-.)

(ID

(IDci.)

4-a

0C)4-

1)

-C)LI

4-

Ce

(4-

5—4-

4-a

LI

(IDCe

ci)

04-

C)Ce

4-

LI

-e4-

Ce

4-

C)Ce-a

4-

C)U

4-

4-

ci)C)

9(CC)(I.)

C)9)C)

‘IDLI

C-C)CC)(IDC)C)

U

-4

.

4-

LI

LI

(4--

C)4.-a4

-

LI

CU

(.4•)

ci)

Ci

(DC

C-C)

C)c/c(/)

c-I(I-)

‘I

LI

C

Cci)L

I

ci)C)L

I

LI

CCC)Ce

C-C)4-

C)4—

)CC4-

CC4-

Ui

(IDCci)

-C)94-’

-C)4-

CC(ID4-

C)4-.)

Ce

4-’

Ce

u-b

CC

0

4-

LI

(IDC)4-

LI

u-b

(IDCCC)LI

(IDCaLI

ci)

(ID

Cl)

4.-’(ID-J

-D9(4-

C)ci)(ID

4-

4--

LI

-4.

LI

9)4.—LI

4—

C)LI

-C)

-a4-

(ID(IDCCCCe

LI

4-

Ui

U(4-

C)(IDC)CCC)4-

(4-..C)4-

C)(ID(ID-a

LI

(ID

0

ci)L

ICCCC)4-

C)

C)4-

C)C)

C)C

-C)C)(ID(IDCC.)DID

0

(ID(IDL

I

Cl4-

9)4-

ci)

(ID(IDLICCL

I

4-

Ui

4-

C)a-a

(IDLIC’

LI

CCci)(ID9)ci)

a—’

4-

ci)(ID

CC

0ci)a

H

LI

CC(ID(IDci)

C)(ID(ID9)LI

LIcC)-4

-

LI

C)LIDC

)

-C)(ID

9)C)

(I)

ci)4--

C.,)

-DCC

LI

4..)

4-

0ULIDci)L

I

LIci)

LI

4-LI

(4--C)(IDL

IC

)4Th

(ID9)

LI

C)CC4-

C-C)CCCCl)

C(/DLI

C)-I

C)4-

9)a-L

I

C)U

CI

4—

U

Referee Report Rubric

Authors Name: ‘C( t)Q- Paper Title: C’__flLJvt’ ir&1F Poor OK 1 Good Super

Title and Abstract - / —

IntroductionClear statement of research question — /

Literature ReviewContent_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)Discussion of underlying theoiy

Empirical AnalysisThe Data

Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableDescription_of procedure_for_data_collectionData_limitations_and_problems

mpirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression_results_table

Rounding numbers and ease of reading displayInterpreting Results

Explanation_of a_paiiicular_coefficientIf_Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabil ities

lncludinu_units_in_dscnssion_of variablesAppropriate_ftinctional_fonns_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of CEM

Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationLse_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasticity_present)Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Disc ussion_of_economic_importanceComputation_and_explanation_of_elasticity_(if_applicable)Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)Answering_the_research_question

C onclusionSummary_of_P1Pe1Future_work

References:_Content_and_StyleO ci all Aspects ot thL Papei

ContentWriting 1Style_(figures,_tables,_look_and_feel)

Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:iVivj 4pic- 9

Final Evaluation: Reviewers Name: tri)

.C

) C)

-j

C 0

C) m C)

C)

-y C-’

-J C) C) -d C)

CD

CD C)

Cr, C) CO C)

LI

CD

CO C::

CD -J C)

CD C) CD -J C) C)

CD

CF)

CO (0 (C:

C) 0 CD (ID C) C) CD CD

H CD D C)

C)

> CC:

(0 -) (0 C,) (0 C) C) (C)

C,) C)

-I C) C)

C)

CD Cl]

(I)

CD C () (I) C) C CC:

-t

(ID C) 0 CD

CC:

C)

Cl)

Cl) C) C) CD C) C) C, C)

-J C) C)

C)

(0

(C:

C)

(I)

(ID C) C) C) C)

C)

(ID C) (-) rn

CD (15 CD CD

C C)

C)

-I C) C) (ID C)

-) C)

-I 0 CD C,)

C) -I CD C) CD CD

H CD -J C)

0 (1)

C)

C)

C-.

,

j-:

C-,,

)

C)

Ct)

C-,,) () C) C) (C)

LID

nj x C) C

)-J C) C) 1 C) C)

LI

C)

C) C) C) 0 CD C.)

CD -J

C)

C) -J

C’) C) CD C)

‘-I C)

(ID CD C) 0 C’) C,)

C),

)

CD (0 d Cl) CD C)

C)

C).

)

C) C) C LID CD

C C) (ID C C) C (ID C,, C) C) C C)

Cl) C) (C;

CD

C) LI

C-

-t

C) C) C) C)-

CD LI

C)

DC)

C) C) -C

)

CD C)

Cr

C)

-t

C)

LI

LI

C-)

C) C)-

CD -.-

DC)

-J N C)

C-.

C) -J C) C-.

( —C CD

H CD Ct) CD C-.

CD o Cl) CD C)-

C) Cl) C)

C) C) C) C -4 CD C) -t C b1

-I C) C-

-J (0 C,)

Cl.)

rf (C)

Cl]

C-, C) -d (C)

C))

-C DC)

CD C)-

C) C) CD C ii

C)

CD —C

rt

C)

C)

C)

C-

CD

LI

LI

LI

CD C)

C) —C

LID

C)-)

CD C)

-C Cm CD -d DC

)

C) CD

C C)) C-)

(I)

C,) C) C) —C

C)-

CD C) -J CD 0

C) C))

CD C.:

CD -t

CD -i C) CD CC:

C-’

-J C)

CD n C-,

C) (C)

C)

CD C)

C LI

C-)

C) C-

CD

C) C)

C) C) -C C)-

(0 Cf C) _

C C)-

CD C) LID CD C) -C

)

C C) C)

C)

Cl)

—C

DC)

C CD Cl) C C) C) -J C) -C

)L

I

o C)

CD C)

C-.

C C)-

C)

C) C) C) CO C) C) -J

DC)

C-

CD C CD C,) C)

-I -t

C)

DC)

-C C)

C/)

C DC-) C C) C) H C)

C-

CD

-CD C -

J-C CD -I CD C)-

CD -C -t

DC C) C-

CD LI

CC;

C)-

C)

C-

CD C)

-I 0 C)-

C) C)

C-

CD C,)

CD C)

LI) CD -J (0 C) -C

D

Cl’

C)-) CD C)

C)

C)

C-

CD C,, C)

U).

C) (I)

(I) C) -J C) C-) C CD -4 C) C-. CD 9 C) m C) C)-

C) -C -C >< Cl)

C— C) Cl) z C) CD -C :5—

CD (0 C C)) C) ii

:!::::

::::::

:::::z

::zz:

::::::

:zo::

::

C) CD

etC etC etC

etC 0 3 —

‘Ct I L

C) C) CD H C-.

.‘,

C’

\ s—-

-

Referee Report Rubric

Author’s Name:

LTitancLbstract

The DataVariable Description and Summary Data Table

Paper Title:I F Poor OK Good Super

IntroductionClear statement of research question

Literature ReviewContent of lit reviewOrganization of lit review

Citation usage and styleTheoretical Analysis (m

Discussion of Linderlying theory

Empirical Analysis

/

Description of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems

Empiiical Results IDiscussion_of DGP/error_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)Regression_results_table

Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting_Results

Explanation of a particular coefficient .1if Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities j1 1 1 1 . FAppropriate_functional_forms_used_and_explainedDiscussion_of violations_of C’EM

Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelationLse_of robust_SEs_(if_heteroskeclasticity_present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion of economic importanceComputation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) —

Comparison_of results_to_previous_work_( from_lit_1’evie\)Answering_the_research_question

Conclusion

L Summary of paperFuture work //

References: Content and Style—

Overall Aspects of the PaperContentWriting 7

Style ( tgures. tables, look and ted)

Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:

Final Evaluation: Reviewers Name:

.

-

‘‘

o-

L:

-—

-‘‘)

--I’

——

—I—

s3--

;_

r“I

PI:;

Cl)

—--

:

--

-s—

.,—

o-

—

-—

—:r

.—

N.

6-;-

.

.

C)

‘c

.J

,-Q

J

.-.

CC

—V

-f-r

)—

S—C0cc-’

—

r)

--—

—-—

)-

.2,

—--

r-):•

v’

.—)

a.;—C

jC

l)

“(4

.C

I1

Ij

-H

L-—

—-

-

L

-J

CD CD CD

CD CD (ID CD

-Ii

C C

if)

CD CD CD CD CD CD C CD

0 CD c-I

CD C)

(ID C CD CD CD

CD CD C CD CD (ID CD CD CD c1 2 CD

2 CD CC)

(ID CD CD (ID C CD CD

> (ID

-J CD C CD -J CD C (ID CD CD -J CD CD (I) CD -J

H CD CD

CD c-I

CD -J CD (ID

(ID

CDI

CD c-I

CD CD CD (ID (ID

CD (ID (ID CD CD CD CD CD CD -J C)

-J CD CD CD CD

CD CD C (ID

(ID CD C (ID

(ID CD CD

CD -4 CD CD CD (ID (ID

(ID CD (ID

(ID CD CD — CD CD CD (ID CD hi

-4 CD -f CD —4

C H CD CD -4 (ID CD

-f CD 4-f C CD CD -4 -4

CD CD --4

-t

CD CD.

-J

(/D CD CD CD

c-I CD CD (ID

C.)

CD

4.-

f.4

)

(4’)

C.)

(.4)

(-4’

)

C:)

C C).)

C).)

C.3

(C)

ri-i

CD CD --4 CD 4-f CD -4 CD tt)

CD -4 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD

CD -i CD 4-f CD rt

--4 CD

(-)

4.-

f

CD CD C (ID CD Ic? CD CD CD CD

(I)

CD

(J(

CD CD 4)

C (ID

C If,

hi

(ID

-,

CD CD CD (4)

CD CD-

CD If)

CD —4

C (/D CD -t

--4

(4)

CD --4 CD (I) C -J 04

C (ID

C-

(/D

C C ./ -C CD CD (ID CD -4 C -4 CD

CD -4

4-

-t

CD CD CD CD-

CD x -I

CD CD -t 0 -4 0 4-f

)

CD CD (ID CD 4-f

)

CD -4 -4 CD CD CD

0 jc CD CD N CD 0 --4 0 4.-

f

C --4 CD

hi

CD CD cli

CD CD CD 9= -

94

*,

-9

CD CD CD (4) z CD CD CD C-’

--4 CD 0 CD (ID

(ID

-f CD (ID

C CD -4 CD Cl) CD CD 4* CL)

CD-

CD CD (C)

-f)

CD CD --4

4- -f)

CD CD CD CD CD ci- CD

H CD (ID —-4 Ic? CD C-

CD (ID

44)

CD CD-

CD (ID CD CD CD C CD C 4-.

)

CD CD 4-f CD

CD CD CD rt

CD -J CD CD -4 CD (/D

(ID CD CD

-CD CD

-CD >< c-

I

CD -4 CD CD

-

(‘C CD 4.-

(ID

(ID CD -J CD -f)

CD CD CD

C -4-4

-J Ic? 4-f

-4 CD CD

()

C CD-

CD CD CD -4 C CD C CD (ID CD CD CD CD C CD -f)

CD CD -tJ

C))

CD —S

CD CD ci-

CD --4

CL (-‘-4 CD (I) CD 4-)

-J CD CD -ci

Ct

(I) H C)) / CC)

(C)

0-

4-

C CD CD

-Ic?

--4

-4 ci-

CD (ID CD CD

-CD CD (ID CD CD 4

-f)

C CD CD IC CD

(I) ci C))

CD (ID CD -t CD CD CD 4-)

CD CD CD

4-

C CD-

C))

4-f CD CD CD CD CD CD

CD C)) C4-

CD CD (ID CD -t CD C))

-J CD

(1)

4- CD -4 CD D CD -t

CD H CD ci-

CD

-4.) D CD CD CD CD CD CD-

CD —4

4-f CD ci CD CD C CD

-CD C

-CD C

D

C4-

CD ci-

CD (/D

CD C))

(ID

C_

fCD C

_f

CD CD CD -J

C_

f

C 4-)

C (I)

CD CD CD CD CD (ID

-f CD -J

.$1)

O(l

.4, 4Y

(.1

4),

-f-

t_,.,

0-

Cp

La

(0 4-, —

4.

-C---

q 4--

I)4

D4 Di —

.4(.

))(

)

ç-

—

(ID CD (ID

(ID CD CD C_

f) 0 -4---

CD -J CD C_f

CD CD 9 hi

CD CD-

CD CD > (ID

H -4 CD CD C 4-

CD CD -J CD (ID (ID CD 4-

ci-

CD -J

C_

f

C .4-4 CD -4 (ID CD CD 4-

C CD

4-

4-f

-J CD (ID z C))

.4’

C))

CD CD H C_

f

CD j -1 -i )

-:.c

—((

—.—

——

—h

j

.“—

)(X

0

A)X

:

‘6

——

4-s

I)

4—i-

’,c_

:.4

_

40

--1

4

If,

CD CD

-J

Referee Report Rubric

Authors Name: / ( (

Title and Abstract

Paper Title:F Poor OK Good Super

J

11

5

Introduction

Clear_statement_of research_questionLiterature Review

Content_of_lit_re_iew

Organization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style X..

Theoietical Analysis (may be in lit ie iew section) 1Discussion_of_underlying_theory

Empirical Analysis

The DataVariable Description and Summaiy Data Table /Description of procedure for data collection >

Data_limitations_and_problemsEmpirical Results

Discussion_of DGP/elTor_term_(e.g.,_CEM_or_Random_Xs)

Regression_results_tableRounding numbers aiid ease of reading display ><

Interpi_eting_Results

Explanation_of_a_particular_coefficientIf_Dummy_Dependent_Variable,_predicted_probabilities

Including_units_in_discussion_of_variables

L Appropriate functional foiins used and explained X -______

Discussion_of violations_of CEM

Testing_for_heteroskedasticity_or_autocorrelation

Use_of robust_SEs_(if heteroskedasticity_present)

1-lypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)

ConfIdence_interval_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)

Discussion_of economic_importance

Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) —

Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review) )Answering the research question

Conclusion

Summary of paperFuture_work

References:_Content_and_Style

O\_eiall_AspLLts_of the_PapetContent

\\‘ritingStyle_(figures,_tables,_look_and_feel)

7

Best Parts of the Paper:

LJ(l fNt fie

L-’f s

Things That Need Work:

Final Evaluation Reviewer’sNarne: Kf,.c AIc.kh

Referee Report Rubric

Author’s Name: Ak v Paoer Title: )].‘<o,’_ J4.....OK Good Suer

Title and AbstractTntroduction

Clear statement of research questionA

Literature Review

Content_of_lit_review

Organization of lit re\’iw

Citation usage and style 4 LTheoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section) j. : x

Discussion_of underlying_theoiyEmpirical Analysis

The DataVan able Oescription aiSummaiy Data Tab1Description of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems

Empnical Results — —

Discussion of DGP!error term (e.g., CEM on Random Xs)

Regression results table

Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_display

Interpi etmg Results —

Explanation of a particular coefficient —

If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities -

Inn !r1?1c !ir!ltç ‘ n’ccr’i, (‘f

aidexplaliedDiscussion of violations of CEM -

Testing for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelation -

Use_of robust_S Es_(if Ii eteroskedasticity_present)

Hypothesis_test_on_estimated_coefficient_(if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion_of_economic_importance

Computation and explanation of elasticity (if applicable) -

Comparison of results to previous work (from lit review)Answering the research question

Conclusion

Summary of paperFuture work —

References: Content and StyleOverall Aspects of the Paper

ContentWritingStyle (figures, tables. look and feel)

Best Parts of’ the Paper: Things That Need Work:

‘% h1/-4c.p+‘p:-

,3ffkL

/€i&rya 4

‘ %h:/.

_____________________

1/4 fl/c/&Final Evaluation: // Reviewer’s Name:

r////h ‘s-4l’J— V

Referee Report Rubric

:

Author s Name:Paper Title:

F Poor OK Good SLLperTitle and AbstractIntroduction

Clear_statement_of research_questionLiterature_Review

Content_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section) fDiscussion of underlying theoryEmpirical AnalysisThe Data

Variable_Description_and_Summary_Data_TableDescription of procedure for data collectionData_limitations_and_problems

Empirical ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM or Random Xs)Regression results table

r Rounding_numbers_and_ease_of reading_displayInterpreting ResultsExplanation of a particular coefficient

If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities1’1i HI

Appropriate functional fonns used and explainedDiscussion of violations of CEMTesting for heteroskedasticity or autocorrelationUse of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present)Hypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable)Discussion of economic importance

Computation_and_explanation_ot_elasticit__( if_applicable)Comparison of results to previous \\ ork ( from lit revie )Answering the research questionConclusion

Summary of paperFuture ork

References: Content and StyleO erall Aspects of the Paper

ContentWrtinuStylures.tabfcs._look_and_feel)

Best Parts of the Paper: Things That Need Work:

Final Evaluation:Reviewcr s Name: ‘

Referee Report Rubric

7 4- / •, , 7>

Authors Name: ‘ PaperTitle:/F Poor OK Good Super

Title and Abstract V L_____Introduction 1

Clear statement of research questionJ,, ji) LLiterature_Review

Content_of_lit_reviewOrganization_of_lit_reviewCitation usage and style

Theoretical Analysis (may be in lit review section)

Discussion of underlying theoiy 1/’

Empirical AnalysisThe Data —

Variable Description and Summaiy Data Table

Description of procedure for data collection

Data_limitations_and_problems

Emoirical_ResultsDiscussion of DGP/error term (e.g., CEM 01. Random Xs) jZ...7Reuression results table

Rounding numbers and ease of reading display I —

Interpreting ResultsExplanation of a particular coefficient

If Dummy Dependent Variable, predicted probabilities;,, iCrflCCiflh1

Approp;ateftlnctiuna1foimsusedandexp1ai11ed

Discussion of violations of CEM

Testing for heteroskedasticity 01’ autocorrelation .

Use of robust SEs (if heteroskedasticity present) JHypothesis test on estimated coefficient (if applicable)

Confidence interval on estimated coefficient (if applicable) ‘

Discussion of economic importance

Computation_and_explanation_of elasticity_(if applicable)

Comparison_of_results_to_previous_work_(from_lit_review)

Answering the research question —

ConclusionSunimarv_of paperFuture work

References:_Content_and_Style

Overall_Aspects_of the_Paper

ContentWritingStyle (figures. tables. look and feel)

Best Parts of the Paper: Things That \eed Work:

4 k

Final Evaluation: Reviewer’s Name:

-

/

IntroductionIntro absent. Need to clearly explain what your topic is and what question you will try to answer.

Example, will use OLS regression to find out if there is a relationship between gas prices and real GDP. I

would make sure you state your dependent variable.

Lit ReviewThis section needs to be a review of similar studies that you can use to compare and contrast

with. Analyze what other people have done to answer the question (various models) and point out

where they are similar with each other and where they are different. Your lit review does not really

explain other studies. You explain possible variables that could affect gas prices, but you need to explain

what other studies have figured out and how they did that. Your last paragraph is not part of a lit

review.

Theoretical Analysis

You tend to do this throughout your lit review. Your last paragraph does resemble, to an extent,

a theoretical analysis, as you describe the variables you think are important to use. I would go further in

depth and explain why you chose those and not others.

DataYou list your variables you will use and describe how they are measured, which is good. You

need to explain where and how you got your data and then describe what potential limitations or

problems you might encounter (correlation, heteroskedasticity). Also don’t forget to use a table.

Empirical ResultsThis section was not present. Suggestion would be to use stata as it is easy to run regressions.

Make sure you report everything and properly use tables, graphs and other figures.

Interpreting Results

This section was not present as you don’t have any data or results yet. Once you do, make sure

you go through this checklist. Also find better lit review studies so you can compare your results with

others. You did include units in your variable list; make sure you interpret your results using units

(example, an increase in x amount of units of variable 1 will lead to an x amount increase in units of y).

Make sure you review CEM.

ConclusionWhen you get to this point make sure you summarize paper. Make your final conclusion

whether Gas $ and GDP are related. Then talk about what you could have done different and what

future studies should look at.

OverallYou have an interesting topic. I would make sure you chose your variables carefully and not drift

away from GDP too much. Remember your goal or question while writing this paper. I would also

recommend taking the final draft to the writing center as they will offer useful help. Make sure you use

proper figures as well.

.1-