Accepted Manuscript
Lithium ion-selective membrane with 2D subnanometer channels
Amir Razmjou, Ghazaleh Eshaghi, Yasin Orooji, Ehsan Hosseini, Asghar HabibnejadKorayem, Fereshteh Mohagheghian, Yasaman Boroumand, Abdollah Noorbakhsh,Mohsen Asadnia, Vicki Chen
PII: S0043-1354(19)30398-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.018
Reference: WR 14667
To appear in: Water Research
Received Date: 27 February 2019
Revised Date: 30 April 2019
Accepted Date: 5 May 2019
Please cite this article as: Razmjou, A., Eshaghi, G., Orooji, Y., Hosseini, E., Korayem, A.H.,Mohagheghian, F., Boroumand, Y., Noorbakhsh, A., Asadnia, M., Chen, V., Lithium ion-selectivemembrane with 2D subnanometer channels, Water Research (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.018.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service toour customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergocopyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Pleasenote that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and alllegal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.018https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.018https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.018
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Lithium ion-selective membrane with 2D subnanometer channels 1
Amir Razmjoua,b*,1, Ghazaleh Eshaghia,1, Yasin Oroojic, Ehsan Hosseinid, Asghar Habibnejad 2
Korayemd, Fereshteh Mohagheghiana, Yasaman Boroumanda, Abdollah Noorbakhsha, 3
Mohsen Asadniae, Vicki Chenf,b 4
aDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technologies, University 5
of Isfahan, Isfahan 73441-81746, Iran 6
bUNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Science and 7
Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia 8
cCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University No. 158, 9
Longpan Road, Nanjing, 210037 Jiangsu, People's Republic of China 10
dSchool of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran 11
eDepartment of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, 12
Australia 13
fSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072, Australia 14
Abstract 15
In the last two years, the rapidly rising demand for lithium has exceeded supply, 16
resulting in a sharp increase in the price of the metal. Conventional electric driven 17
membrane processes can separate Li+ from divalent cations, but there is virtually no 18
commercial membrane that can efficiently and selectively extract Li+ from a solution 19
containing chemically similar ions such as Na+ and K+. Here, we show that the different 20
movement behavior of Li+ ion within the sub-nanometre channel leads to Li+ ion-21
selectivity and high transport rate. Using inexpensive negatively charged 2D 22
subnanometer hydrous phyllosilicate channels with interlayer space of 0.43 nm in a 23
membrane-like morphology, we observed that for an interlayer spacing of below 1 nm, 24
1 These authors contributed equally to this work.
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2
Li+ ions move along the length of the channel by jumping between its two walls. 25
However, for above 1 nm spacing, the ions used only one channel wall to jump and 26
travel. Molecular dynamic (MD) simulation also revealed that ions within the 27
nanochannel exhibit acceleration-deceleration behaviour. Experimental results showed 28
that the nanochannels could selectively transport monovalent ions of Li+> Na+> and K+ 29
while excluding other ions such as Cl- and Ca2+ , with the selectivity ratios of 1.26, 1.59 30
and 1.36 for Li+/Na+, Li+/K+, and Na+/K+ respectively, which far exceed the mobility 31
ratios in traditional porous ion exchange membranes. The findings of this work provide 32
researchers with not only a new understanding of ions movement behavior within 33
subnanometer confined areas but also make a platform for the future design of ion-34
selective membranes. 35
Keywords: Subnanometer channels; Li ion selective membrane; two-dimensional materials; 36
lithium extraction; vermiculite 37
1 Introduction 38 It is predicted that the supply of the energy-critical element of lithium will soon fall below its 39
continuously increasing demand, which will render it a strategically influential 40
element(Choubey et al. 2017). The amount of Li+ in seawater is estimated to be nearly 41
230,000 million tons−almost 57000 times higher than its abundance on land(Yoshizuka et al. 42
2006). However, the low concentration of Li+ and its coexistence with chemically similar 43
ions such as Na+ and K+ in seawater makes the extraction of Li+ from this source very 44
challenging. 45
Extraction of Li+ using membrane technology from seawater, lakes or geothermal brine as 46
secondary Li resources is highly sought-after, particularly for fast-growing industries such as 47
electric vehicles and lithium-ion batteries. Due to the poor monovalent selectivity of 48
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
conventional membrane technologies such as nanofiltration or electrodialysis using cation 49
exchange membranes, they can only be used to concentrate Li+ by removing all the divalent 50
ions. A membrane that could transport certain ions such as monovalent cations (Li+, Na+, and 51
K+) while excluding other ions would be highly valued. 52
For the design of a Li+ selective nanochannel/membrane, the two parameters of nanochannel 53
structure and chemistry must be adjusted carefully (Razmjou 2019). Nanochannel 54
dimensions, i.e., interlayer spacing, length, and symmetric or asymmetric channel 55
morphology, along with the inner surface charge, play a vital role in the selective 56
transportation of Li+ ions. Many comprehensive reviews have discussed the ion transport 57
mechanisms in nanopores and nanochannels (Daiguji 2010, Horike et al. 2013, Oener et al. 2017, 58
Tagliazucchi and Szleifer 2015). Membrane driving force (pressure or potential difference) is 59
also another key parameter that should be taken into account. 60
For a neutral nanochannel, the channel dimension must be smaller than the Li+ hydration 61
diameter (~0.76 nm). Otherwise, the channel will not exhibit Li+ selectivity (>1) among alkali 62
metal ions (Guo et al. 2016, Zhang et al. 2018b). It is reported that for neutral sub-nanometre 63
channels, the main mechanism for small monovalent ions to move is based on the partial 64
dehydration and loss of their hydration layers (Razmjou 2019). When the nanochannel 65
surfaces hold negative charges, the partial dehydration is not the only ion conductivity 66
mechanism, and the ions’ affinity to the functional groups also comes into play. The channel 67
dimension then can be higher than (~0.76 nm). 68
Playing with the design above parameters, recently researchers examined a range of building 69
blocks to prepare Li+ ion-selective membranes. Metal/organic frameworks such as UIO-66 70
(Zhang et al. 2018a), MOP-18(Jung et al. 2008), ZIF-8 (Zhang et al. 2018a), ZIF-7 (Zhang et al. 71
2018a), and sulfonated HKUST-1(Guo et al. 2016) have recently exhibited Li+ ion selectivity. 72
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
MOFs, particularly when they are threaded with negative ligands, revealed high Li+/Na+ or 73
Li+/K+ selectivities and great potential. However, stable defect free flexible MOF thin film is 74
a significant ongoing issue. Researchers have tried to oxidize graphene sheets (GO) partially 75
and stack them to create membranes with 2D nanochannels for precise ionic and molecular 76
sieving in aqueous solution (Han et al. 2013, Joshi et al. 2014, Liu et al. 2015). Recently, 77
Cseri et al.(Cseri et al. 2018) prepared a mechanically robust and highly permselective anion 78
exchange membranes based on GO and polybenzimidazolium nanocomposite. Their 79
membrane exhibited high ion exchange capacity (1.7–2.1 mmol g−1), with exceptional 80
permselectivity (up to 0.99). GO membranes also showed Li+ ion selectivity (Abraham et al. 81
2017, Joshi et al. 2014, Zhao et al. 2018). However, difficulty in reducing the interlayer spacing 82
of graphene oxide membranes, and maintaining this space during swelling when immersed in 83
the aqueous solution, have been considered the main challenges hindering potential ion 84
filtration applications of graphene oxide membranes (Goh et al. 2015, Huang et al. 2013, 85
Hung et al. 2014, Su et al. 2014, Sun et al. 2016). Creating Li+ ion selective nanochannels on 86
polymeric membranes such as PET (Wang et al. 2018, Wen et al. 2016, Zhang et al. 2018a) using 87
ion irradiation and UV radiation is currently a lab scale process and requires expensive 88
infrastructure. 89
Although the proposed Li+ ion-selective membranes are promising, there are several 90
challenges that keep them from meeting the industry requirements. The three major 91
challenges are 1) scalability, 2) high cost of the building blocks, and 3) a lack of fundamental 92
understanding Li+ ion behaviour in nanoconfined areas. 93
As mentioned ion transportation mechanisms inside nanochannels have been well-studied. 94
However, the mechanisms by which Li+ ions show higher transportation rates and thus 95
selectivity in some designed nanochannels than over Na+ or K+ ions is not yet clear. This 96
uncertainty and poor understanding, particularly with regards to dehydration energy barrier, 97
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
has resulted in contradictory conclusions and discussions. Therefore, more experimental and 98
theoretical explorations are needed to understand what dictates Li+ ion to transport within the 99
nanochannel at a higher rate than Na+ or K+. 100
The concept of this work is to exploit 2D nanofluidic vermiculite (VCT) channels into a 101
morphology which can be used to control ion transportation across the membrane selectively. 102
Here, VCT is selected because it has significant advantages compared with GO and other 103
two-dimensional structures. VCT with its extraordinary chemical and thermal stability is 104
much more readily available and much less costly (Orooji et al. 2017). It can be exfoliated 105
easily in water via thermal heat treatment and ionic exchange, as opposed to the exfoliation 106
procedure of graphene and other 2D materials. Our novel and strategically-designed 107
membranes were produced from vastly available inexpensive VCT minerals (~20 USD/kg 108
from Sigma Aldrich and ~20 CNY/kg from Chinese suppliers).To prepare VCT membranes 109
we introduced pressure-assisted vacuum deposition techniques that can be easily scaled up. 110
Recently, Shao et al. (Shao et al. 2015) demonstrated that such 2D nanofluidic channels could 111
show superionic proton conductivity. Here, we show for the first time another fascinating 112
property of 2D nanofluidic VCT channels: selective transportation of Li+. We also used 113
molecular dynamic (MD) simulation to understand the mechanism by which Li+ ions 114
transport through VCT nanochannels. 115
The outcomes of this work provide researchers with a new understanding of Li+ions 116
movement behavior within subnanometer confined areas, and also make a platform for the 117
future design of ion-selective membranes 118
119
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
2 Experimental 120
2.1 Materials 121
Vermiculite (VCT) (CAS No.: 0001318009) Calcium chloride (CaCl2, 97%), Potassium 122
chloride (KCl, 99%) Sodium chloride (NaCl, 99.5%), and Lithium chloride (LiCl, 99%) were 123
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2 124
35%) and ethanol (96%) were sourced from a local provider. 125
2.2 Methods 126
Details of VCT membrane preparation, nanofluidic device fabrication, membrane 127
monovalent cations conductivity measurement and analysis of desalination performance of 128
VCT membranes are presented in “Methods” in Supporting Information. A variety of 129
techniques, i.e. AFM, SEM, TEM, BET, and XRD were used to characterize the membranes 130
(see Supporting Information for more details). 131
3 Results and discussions 132
3.1 Preparation and characterization of Li+ ion selective VCT membrane 133 In this work, the exfoliation of VCTs followed the approaches used by Walker and Garrett 134
(Walker and Garrett 1967) and Obut and Girgin (Obut and Girgin 2002). Briefly, the 135
exfoliation was performed based on a rapid thermal shock and subsequent several ion 136
exchange steps and a final hydrogen peroxide treatment (See Figure S1a). As shown in 137
Figure 1a, VCT is known as the layered magnesium aluminosilicate compound. Each layer 138
has a negative charge (1.4 mCm-2) and consists of one Mg-based octahedral sheet that is 139
sandwiched between two tetrahedral silicate sheets (Valaskova and Martynkova 2013). The 140
substitutional Al+3 cations in the tetrahedral sheets give rise to the negative charges on the 141
layers. These negative charges are balanced by cations between the layers. During the 142
thermal shock, the interlayer water rapidly vaporizes and expands the crystals into an 143
accordion-like structure (see Figure 1b and c). XRD and BET results exhibited in Figure 1d 144
and 1e revealed that the thermal shock at elevated temperature could destroy the VCT 145
structure. The disappearance of XRD peaks in the 2θ range of 5-15o which correspond to K 146
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
and Mg-VCT and hydration layers(Marcos et al. 2009) alongside with a significant reduction 147
in the BET surface area and BJH pore volume (from 44.59 m2/g and 0.104 cm3/g at 900 °C to 148
15.03 m2/g and 0.0108 cm3/g at 1000 °C) confirm the possibility of structural VCT unit 149
collapse (Orooji et al. 2017). During the ionic exchange process, the interlayer distances 150
increase by replacing the interlayer cations such as Na+, K+, and Mg2+ with Li +, which has a 151
larger hydration diameter. During the final hydrogen peroxide treatment, the oxygen 152
evolution from its decomposition helps to exfoliate the VCT layers further. As can be seen in 153
Figure 1f, the thickness of the structural unit (two magnesium aluminosilicate layers plus an 154
interlayer space) is approximately 0.83±0.06 nm with interlayer space of 0.43±0.05 nm.” The 155
values were obtained using an image processor software provided by the TEM instrument. 156
The d-spacing was calculated using XRD data and the Bragg equation. The inset image in 157
Figure 1f shows that the thermal and chemical exfoliation processing led to a light brown 158
colloidal suspension of VCT layers, as has also been observed elsewhere(Shao et al. 2015). 159
The nanofluidic membrane can be readily prepared by reassembly of the exfoliated VCT 160
layers using different approaches, including filtration, dip-coating, spraying and solvent 161
evaporation (Ballard and Rideal 1983, Shao et al. 2015). In this work, the filtration technique 162
was used to stack the exfoliated 2D sheets (see Methods). Figure 2a shows the flexible free-163
standing VCT membrane (1 mm thickness) obtained by the vacuum filtration process. SEM 164
and AFM images in Figure 2b show the cross-section of our membrane with lamellar 165
structure. It appears that the membrane consists of a stack of 40 nm layers (flakes) such that 166
each layer consists of many 0.83 nm structural units (see Figure 2c). XRD results in Figure 167
2d are attributed to the raw VCT particles and our membrane. As can be seen, the absence of 168
two strong peaks below 2θ of 10° and the appearance of one peak around 6° (which is 169
attributed to the lithium-intercalated VCT) indicate that the original interlayer cations (Mg2+, 170
K+) have been successfully exchanged by Li+. 171
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
Following Sessile drop technique used in our previous works (Orooji et al. 2018, Shirani et 172
al. 2017), the water contact angles of the VCT membranes were measured. It was observed 173
that the water droplet disappeared immediately within a second after touching the 174
membranes. A broad definition of superhydrophilicity which is mostly referred to in the 175
literature is achieving zero contact angles within the first 5 sec (Razmjou et al. 2011). 176
Therefore, our membrane is considered as the superhydrophilic membrane. 177
The water uptake and swelling ratio were measured following our previous works with some 178
amendments ((Razmjou et al. 2013a, Razmjou et al. 2013b, Razmjou et al. 2013c)). Briefly, a 179
piece of the membrane (1 by 2 cm) without PDMS sandwiching was placed on a wet tissue to 180
gradually absorb water molecules. The sample was weighed every few mins until it reached 181
saturation and thus its weight was unchanged. The water uptake Q of the membrane was 182
calculated as Q = (Wt-Wd)/Wd×100, where Wt is the weight (g) of the wet membrane at the 183
end of the experiment and Wd is the weight (0.04g) of the initial dry sample before the test. 184
The sample did uptake water 50% of its dry weight. The swelling ratio of the membrane was 185
also calculated based on the volumetric changes of the sample after water uptake, and it was 186
found 30%. It should point out here the PDMS sandwiched sample showed insignificant 187
swelling ratio as expected. 188
189
3.2 Li+ ion selectivity 190 The electric-field-driven ion transport in VCT nanochannel was analyzed by linear sweep 191
voltammetry (L.S.V) using LiCl, NaCl, KCl, CaCl2 solutions, and an in-house cell (see 192
Figure S1b). The ionic conductivity of the fabricated membrane can be estimated from the 193
slope of the I-V curves in the range of potentials within which no redox reactions can occur 194
(Shao et al. 2015, Zhang et al. 2018b) . As can be seen in Figure 3a, the slope of I-V curves 195
remained zero for dry VCT membrane, and also when deionized water was used as the 196
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
9
electrolytic. The slope values reduced for HCl, LiCl, NaCl, and KCl and approached zero 197
when CaCl2 solution was used. An insignificant number of Ca2+ divalent or Cl- anions were 198
able to pass through the VCT nanochannel as the independent movement of ion species 199
allows the passage of current through the solution. 200
It should be noted that in the applied potential range (-0.1 to 0.3 V), electrolysis of water 201
molecules cannot occur. So any change in the I-V curve is due to the transportation of the 202
corresponding cations. The figure also shows that the ion conductivity increases as the ion 203
sizes reduce, such that H+ and K+ showed the highest (0.1 S.cm-1) and lowest (0.04 S.cm-1) 204
conductivity at 0.0001 M related electrolyte solutions respectively. 205
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is the most common AC technique used to 206
characterize electrochemical properties (ion conductivity) of the membrane [2, 3]. In this 207
technique, the ohmic resistance of the cell can be extracted by applying an alternating current 208
(or voltage) driving force and measuring the magnitude and phase of the cell voltage (or 209
current) to determine the complex impedance of the system. As can be seen in Figure 3b and 210
Figure S2a, Nyquist plots of proposed membrane versus Li-ion concentration (ranging from 211
0.0001 to 1 M) using EIS revealed that the ionic conductivity increases by increasing the 212
electrolyte solutions. 213
Currently, there is no commercial synthetic membrane with atomic-sized pores that can 214
efficiently separate monatomic ions (for instance Li+, Na+, and K+) with the same valence and 215
similar sizes. Having such a membrane is highly demanded, particularly for mineral 216
extraction and ion batteries. To examine the Li+ ion selectivity of VCT membranes, the ion 217
selectivity ratio of Mi/Mj was calculated from the equation(Zhang et al. 2018b) below, 218
������������ =�������.��
�������.�� (1) 219
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10
where M is a cation, and i and j stand for Li, Na, and K at +0.2 V. Using the I-V curves, the 220
selectivity ratios of Li+/Na+, Li+/K+ and Na+/K+ were calculated as 1.26, 1.59 and 1.36, 221
respectively. These ratios are much greater than the corresponding mobility ratios in water. 222
For example, the mobility ratio of Na+ /K+ in water is around 0.7, which is significantly 223
smaller than the value for our VCT membranes (1.36). The selectivity ratios of the binary 224
ions were evaluated using ICP-MS. As can be seen in Table S1, the selectivity ratios are close 225
to those calculated by I-V curves and Equation 1.Figure S2b and Table S2 show a 226
comparison between the selectivity performance of VCT membranes and similar techniques 227
described in the literature. As can be seen, the VCT membranes with 2D nanochannels 228
showed either higher ion selectivity performance or a much simpler synthesis route. Table S3 229
also compares the alkali ion selectivity performance of VCT membrane with other synthetic 230
nanochannels. Apart from ZIF8/GO/AAO membranes introduced in Ref. (Zhang et al. 2018b), 231
which has similar ion selectivity performance but a complex, expensive synthetic route, our 232
VCT membranes showed significantly superior performance. It should be noted that the 233
ZIF8/GO/AAO showed anion conductivity (calculated ion mobility of ~2.5 for Cl-(Zhang et 234
al. 2018b)) whereas VCT membranes prevent the transport of anions. 235
It is well-proven that ion conductivity normally increases with temperature. The effect of 236
electrolyte temperature (up to 90 oC) on the VCT membranes’ performance was studied in 237
Figure S3. As can be seen, the performance of the membrane increased slightly without 238
destroying the VCT unit structure, indicating high thermal stability. Shao et al. also studied 239
the effect of high temperature (500 oC) treatment on VCT membrane(Shao et al. 2015). They 240
showed that the nanochannels of VCT exhibit extraordinary thermal stability such that they 241
can maintain their proton conduction function even after annealing at 500 °C in air. Lack of 242
thermal stability of available commercial polymeric membranes has limited their 243
applications. The effect of membrane orientation was examined to see if there is any ion 244
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
transport perpendicular to the direction of reconstructed layers (horizontal vs. vertical ion 245
transport, see inset in Figure 3c). As shown in Figure 3c, ion flow is mainly along the 246
membrane, but it can also flow across it through defects in its structure. Although horizontal 247
transportation of ions along the membrane is dominant, vertical transport may be desired for 248
applications such as water purification, when a high effective membrane surface area is 249
needed to increase footprint. As shown in the inset image in Figure 2a, the VCT membrane 250
was bent for 24 hr then tested to examine any mechanical tension induced structural damage. 251
No significant difference in the I-V curves of the VCT membrane before and after bending 252
was observed (refer to Figure S4a). The effect of membrane thickness on the ion 253
transportation was also investigated in Figure S4b. Results indicated that reducing the 254
membrane thickness by half led to a marginal reduction in ion conductivity. This indicates 255
the VCT membrane has good ion transportability. 256
During the selective transportation of ions, there is a chance that some Li+, Na+ or K+ remain 257
in the interlayer space, and may result in a change in the degree of hydration for the cation. 258
This, in turn, could lead to a change in the interlayer spacing, thus decreasing the 259
performance of the membrane. In order to determine if the membrane performance remained 260
stable, a test of transportation of Na+ (NaCl 1 M) over a number of hours was conducted. 261
This experiment was repeated four times. Samples were also immersed in a solution of NaCl 262
1 M for six months and then tested. As can be seen in Figure S5a, the membranes exhibited 263
long-term stability. Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis (Bruker Nano Berlin, 264
Germany) was performed on the 6-month VCT membrane to examine Na ion trace. As can be 265
seen in Figure S5b, the associated K peak was not observing, confirming the pervious 266
result.The performance of VCT membrane was also compared with its two commercial 267
counterparts of Nafion and CMI-7000S. As shown in Figure 3d, at 1 M HCl, the VCT 268
membrane portion conductivity is similar to that for a Nafion membrane. Nafion membranes 269
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
12
have exhibited ion mobility of divalent cations inside themselves.(Okada et al. 1998), and 270
show very poor Li+ ion selectivity (see Table S2). The ion conductivity of our 2D nanofluidic 271
VCT membranes at 0.1 M HCl is about 0.165 S.cm-1 compared with that of graphene oxide 272
membrane which is 0.075 at 0.1 M HCl. The proton conductivities of commercial PEMs of 273
Nafion and CMI-7000S are also 0.18 and 0.075 at 0.1 M HCl. The VCT membrane has ease 274
of fabrication and cost advantages over Nafion, and shows great potential for commercial 275
implementation. 276
Li concentration in different sources varies from 0.1-0.2 ppm for seawater (Yoshizuka et al. 277
2006) to 18-2000 ppm for lakes, geothermal and oilfield brines. There are some reports of 278
lithium concentration values of >4000 ppm for the brines (Choubey et al. 2017, Choubey et 279
al. 2016). Using reverse osmosis (RO) or membrane distillation (MD) systems to concentrate 280
the brines, the concentration can go further to a higher level of 25000-35000 ppm. In this 281
study, the Li+ extraction performance of VCT membrane was reported based on the reduction 282
in electrical conductivity (EC) due to the removal of Li+ from a saline solution with a 283
different concentration of LiCl (1000, 8000, 15000, 25000 and 35000 ppm) in an electrolysis 284
cell (See Figure S1c) with a different voltage of 3-12V. The volume of the three identical 285
reservoirs in Figure S1c was 60cc, each 20cc. For each measurement, the sample solutions 286
were diluted 3 times before EC measurement. The final EC value was adjusted before 287
reporting. As shown in Figure 3e, the EC reduces over time for all of the LiCl concentrations 288
tested. Results showed that the EC drop is more pronounced at higher concentrations of LiCl. 289
Figure 3f presents the effect of the change in applied power density (V). As can be seen in the 290
figure, the extraction rate increased significantly as the voltage increased, particularly at high 291
LiCl concentration, indicating a good efficiency for salt lakes Li+ extraction. Similar 292
experiments were performed for Na+ and K+ (see Figure S1 d-g). Also, EC of permeates was 293
measured for NaCl feed solution with an initial concentration of 8000 ppm with 2, 4, and 6 hr 294
electrodialysis (see Figure S1h). As can be seen, the diluted permeate ECs are almost half of 295
the feed solutions as the volume of the two reservoirs (3 and 1) is twice the feed reservoir. 296
Considering the fact that the ppm value of a sodium chloride solution happens to be very 297
close to half of its conductivity value (in milliSiemens/cm), we performed a simple mass 298
balance to confirm the results. From the Table in Figure S1h, after 4 hr of electrodialysis, the 299
concentration of NaCl in feed is around 500 ppm while that of the permeate is around 244 300
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
ppm. Considering that the feed volume reservoir is half of the permeate volume, there is a 301
near mass balance between feed and permeate. 302
303
304
305
3.3 Li+ ion transport mechanism and MD simulation 306 The proton conductivity of the VCT membrane was measured using the L.S.V technique and 307
apparatus which was shown in Figure S1b (see methods). Figure 4a represents I-V curves 308
recorded at different pH (different concentrations of HCl). From the figure, the higher the 309
proton concentration is, the higher the ion conductivity becomes, and the higher the slope of 310
the I-V curve. This higher conductivity at a higher concentration of ions was also observed 311
for KCl, NaCl and LiCl solutions (see Figure S6). Since the three electrolytes share the same 312
anion (Cl−), the differences of the ionic currents in I-V curves must be caused by the cations. 313
Figure 4b shows the pH-dependent proton conductivity of VCT membrane in comparison 314
with that of the bulk HCl solution. The proton conductivity of bulk is directly proportional to 315
the concentration of HCl. At low pH, the conductivity values of the membrane were similar 316
to that of nanofluidic channels, whereas at high pH the values deviated from the bulk 317
behavior. It seems that in the acidic regime the nanochannel conductivity above pH 5 was 318
somewhat constant, and was independent of the concentration of bulk. This pH-independent 319
conductivity is a signature of surface charge-governed transport(Shao et al. 2015), and also is 320
an indication of good sealing of VCT membrane by PDMS. At high pH values (basic 321
regime), the Debye length near the negatively charged VCT nanochannel is greater than the 322
interlayer spacing between the tetrahedral silicate sheets. Therefore, cations between the 323
layers are the dominant charge carrier, and the surface charge density determines their 324
concentration inside the channels rather than bulk electrolyte concentration(Salieb-Beugelaar 325
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
et al. 2009). This greater-than-bulk proton conductivity behavior was also observed for LiCl, 326
NaCl, and NaCl (see Figure S7). 327
328
329
330
MD simulation was performed to understand the effect of VCT nanochannel dimensions and 331
external electric field density on the Li+ ion transportation mechanism. In this work, all 332
molecular dynamics simulations were performed using Non-equilibrium, in the NVT 333
ensemble at a temperature of 298.15 K, maintained using the Nose-Hoover thermostat (please 334
refer to Supporting Information for more details). The simulation revealed that reducing the 335
nanochannel dimensions from nanometer to subnanometer scale resulted in two interesting 336
phenomena: a reduction in water density (number of H2O/nm3), and a change in Li+ ion 337
jumping transportation behavior from two-surface to one-surface charge-governed transport 338
mode. 339
Studies using density functional theory revealed that strong electric fields have a significant 340
impact on the structure and energetics of small Li+-water clusters (Daub et al. 2015). In the 341
absence of an electric field, the Li+.nH2O forms a symmetry of n = 4 tetrahedral energy 342
minimum structure. According to Daub et al. (Daub et al. 2015), the small electric field 343
strength is sufficient to break the symmetry into an asymmetric planar cluster with n=3, 344
resulting in the partial dehydration of Li+ ions. A similar transition was also observed for the 345
6-coordinated cluster, Li+.6H2O to 5- and 4-coordinated clusters at field strengths of 0.2 V/Å 346
and 0.3 V/Å, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 4c and d, the confinement effect resulted 347
in a substantial reduction in the water density in the first hydration shell of Li+. The second 348
hydration shell also nearly disappeared. In agreement with Daub et al. (Daub et al. 2015), the 349
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
increase in applied potential from 0 to 2 V/nm resulted in the reduction in coordination 350
number and RDF peaks and higher partial dehydration degree. 351
It is well-proven that saline water expels its salt content upon freezing(Nebbia and Menozzi 352
1968). It is also reported that, in a small nanoscale confined area, water exhibits layered 2D 353
structuring and can form ordered ice-like phases (Fumagalli et al. 2018, Karna et al. 2018, 354
Winarto et al. 2017). This might be the reason for increasing the migration rate of Li+ ions 355
towards the wall surfaces of VCT nanochannels. As can be seen in Figure 5b, d, f, and h, the 356
water density and number of layers inside the nanochannel increases when the channel 357
dimension increases from 0.4 to 1.2 nm. Reduction in water density could facilitate the Li+ 358
ion movement and lead to higher ion mobility. Water molecular dipoles also aligned with the 359
electric field such that oxygen-negative-end of the dipole faced the cathode (positive) while 360
hydrogen-positive-ends of the dipole faced the anode (negative). 361
Our MD simulation revealed that Li+ ions transportation behavior within the VCT 362
nanochannels with sub-nanometre dimension is different from that of nanometre dimension 363
(>1nm) channels. When the nanochannel dimension is below ~1 nm, the Li+ ions conduct via 364
the two-surface charge-governed transport mechanism; Li+ ions jump from one of the 365
nanochannel walls to the opposite wall while they move in the electric field direction 366
(depicted in Figure 5a as migration from left to right along the nanochannel). However, when 367
the channel dimension was increased to 1.2 nm, the Li+ ions moved by hopping only along 368
one surface of the nanochannel (one-surface charge-governed transport mechanism, see 369
Figure 5g). The reason may be related to the phenomenon of spontaneous symmetry breaking 370
of charge-regulated surfaces (Majee et al. 2018). When two surfaces are equally charged 371
similarly to our VCT nanochannels, their symmetry can become spontaneously broken with 372
decreasing the inter-surface distance. Their charge densities could then differ in magnitude 373
and even in sign. The origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking of charge on VCT surface is 374
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
a competition between the adsorption of Li+ ions from the solution to the surface and the 375
interaction between the adsorbed ions already on the surface or the functional groups existing 376
on the nanochannel wall surface. 377
The Li+ ions moved along the length of nanochannel due to an external electric field from left 378
to right toward the negative electrode, while the ions are attracted toward the VCT surfaces 379
due to the potential of the electrical double layer (EDL). The potential is at a maximum at the 380
VCT surface and reduces exponentially to the zeta potential ƺ (between the Stern layer and 381
the diffuse layer). For a VCT nanochannel with dimensions smaller than 1 nm, the absorbed 382
Li+ ions on one of the surfaces spontaneously break the charge symmetry resulting in the 383
reduction in charge density, potential of the surface’s EDL, and even sign. Since the EDL’s 384
potential on the opposite surface is higher, the ions will be attracted to that opposite surface 385
when they jump. This spontaneous breaking of charge symmetry of the surfaces repeats so 386
that the Li+ ions can move along the structure by jumping from side to side until they finally 387
exit the nanochannel. When the channel size increased to above 1 nm, the influence of the 388
potential of the opposite surface diminished to the point that it is not strong enough to attract 389
the Li+ ion, resulting in the one-surface charge-governed transport mechanism. 390
391
This phenomenon can also be explained based on the Lennard-Jones potential (1924). Table 392
S4 shows the Lennard-Jones potential parameters of oxygen and lithium. In the table, σ is the 393
finite distance at which the inter-particle potential is zero and is 2.87 and 3.11 Å for Li and 394
surface O, respectively. Therefore the inter-particle potential of lithium and oxygen at 2.99 Å 395
is zero. Figure 6a shows the RDF of available oxygen on the VCT surface and Li+. As can be 396
seen in the figure, the first unstable and sharp peak appeared at 1.86 Å (< 2.87 Å) for an 0.4 397
nm VCT nanochannel (see inset in Figure 6a), which is an indication of the repulsive force 398
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
between Li+ ions and oxygens of VCT surface. This spontaneous repulsive force reduces as 399
the channel dimension increased and reached a level that Li+ ions were no longer able to jump 400
between the surfaces, so hoped only along one surface. It was also discovered that the 401
transport behavior of Li+ ions inside VCT nanochannel not only changes in sub-nanometre 402
VCT channel but also has a different velocity distribution and gradient. Figures 6b and 6c 403
show that the velocity of the Li+ ions inside VCT nanochannel was zero in the absence of an 404
external electric field (0 V/nm), meaning no ions could diffuse into the membrane. 405
In the presence of an external electric field, Li+ ions exhibited an almost linear velocity 406
gradient and acceleration at the entry to the nanochannel, followed by a sudden drop 407
(acceleration-deceleration behavior). Change in the velocity gradient is very large for sub-408
nanometre (0.4 nm) VCT nanochannel (Figure 6b) as voltage increases, whereas it is much 409
smaller for 1.2 nm VCT nanochannel (Figure 6c) due to higher water fluidity and density (see 410
Figure S9 for velocity distribution of Li+ in 0.6 and 0.8 nm VCT nanochannel). The sudden 411
drop in the velocity gradient might be related to a phenomenon known as the “ion-enrichment 412
and ion-depletion effect” of nanochannels (Pu et al. 2004). Increasing the applied potential and 413
power density of the electrical field (voltage) beyond a certain value between the two sides of 414
the nanochannel causes the depletion of ions in the entrance (at Y: 1.5 nm in Figures 6b and 415
6c) and their enrichment on the other side (at Y: 4.5 nm) resulting in an increase in 416
polarization. The accumulation of Li+ ions at Y: 4.5 nm creates a strong repulsive force that 417
substantially reduces the velocity of incoming ions. 418
Figure S10 is the results of our MD simulation to investigate the effect of change in power 419
water density on the diffusion coefficient and ion flux of cations in the VCT membrane with 420
0.4 and 0.8 nm interlayer spacing. As can be seen, increasing the power density enhanced not 421
only the Li+ transport rate but also the Ca2+ transport rate inside the VCT nanochannel. 422
However, providing such a high-power density for Ca2+ ions to overcome the dehydration 423
and crosslinking energy barriers are practically challenging and might not be economically 424
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
viable. Therefore, for the Li extraction application at relatively low power density, our VCT 425
membrane exhibited great potential. 426
The Li+ ions velocity is compared with those of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ in Figure 6d and Figure 427
S11. The higher Li+ ions velocity might be related to higher ion mobility of Li+. According to 428
Wen et al. (Wen et al. 2016), the partially dehydrated Li+ ions have more compact structures 429
(shorter width of the hydration shell) than Na+, K+, and Ca2+ ions, and thus exhibit higher ion 430
mobilities and conductivities through nanochannels. 431
4 Conclusion 432 The industry is urgently seeking new and efficient membranes to extract Li+ from brine and 433
seawater to address the fast-growing lithium demand. Here, we showed that the reassembling 434
of exfoliated two-dimensional VCT sheets could lead to flexible free-standing membranes 435
which can selectively conduct Li+ while excluding other anions or divalent cations. Using 436
MD simulation, we discovered that when the nanochannel dimension is below ~1 nm, Li+ 437
ions jump from one of the nanochannel walls to the opposite wall while they move in the 438
electric field direction. However, when the channel dimension was increased to 1.2 nm, the 439
Li+ ions move by hopping only along one surface of the nanochannel. The inexpensive VCT 440
membrane introduced in this work exhibited either a significantly higher ion selectivity or 441
more cost-effective fabrication process when compared to similar works reported in the 442
literature. This provides an opportunity for many and varied commercial applications of this 443
advanced high-tech membrane. Although in this work the performance of the membrane was 444
evaluated for lithium recovery, it might also be considered for other applications, such as 445
lithium-based batteries and supercapacitors, sensors, solvent dehydration, gas purification, 446
and molecular sieving. 447
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
19
Acknowledgment 448
Authors acknowledge Munirah Mohammad for her contribution to this work. 449
References 450
(1924) On the determination of molecular fields. —II. From the equation of state of a gas. 451 Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A 106(738), 463-477. 452 Abraham, J., Vasu, K.S., Williams, C.D., Gopinadhan, K., Su, Y., Cherian, C.T., Dix, J., Prestat, E., Haigh, 453 S.J., Grigorieva, I.V., Carbone, P., Geim, A.K. and Nair, R.R. (2017) Tunable sieving of ions using 454 graphene oxide membranes. Nature Nanotechnology 12, 546. 455 Ballard, D. and Rideal, G. (1983) Flexible inorganic films and coatings. Journal of Materials Science 456 18(2), 545-561. 457 Choubey, P.K., Chung, K.-S., Kim, M.-s., Lee, J.-c. and Srivastava, R.R. (2017) Advance review on the 458 exploitation of the prominent energy-storage element Lithium. Part II: From sea water and spent 459 lithium ion batteries (LIBs). Minerals Engineering 110, 104-121. 460 Choubey, P.K., Kim, M.-s., Srivastava, R.R., Lee, J.-c. and Lee, J.-Y. (2016) Advance review on the 461 exploitation of the prominent energy-storage element: Lithium. Part I: From mineral and brine 462 resources. Minerals Engineering 89, 119-137. 463 Cseri, L., Baugh, J., Alabi, A., AlHajaj, A., Zou, L., Dryfe, R.A.W., Budd, P.M. and Szekely, G. (2018) 464 Graphene oxide–polybenzimidazolium nanocomposite anion exchange membranes for 465 electrodialysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 6(48), 24728-24739. 466 Daiguji, H. (2010) Ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Chemical Society Reviews 39(3), 901-911. 467 Daub, C.D., Åstrand, P.-O. and Bresme, F. (2015) Lithium Ion–Water Clusters in Strong Electric Fields: 468 A Quantum Chemical Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 119(20), 4983-4992. 469 Fumagalli, L., Esfandiar, A., Fabregas, R., Hu, S., Ares, P., Janardanan, A., Yang, Q., Radha, B., 470 Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Gomila, G., Novoselov, K.S. and Geim, A.K. (2018) Anomalously low 471 dielectric constant of confined water. Science 360(6395), 1339-1342. 472 Goh, K., Jiang, W., Karahan, H.E., Zhai, S., Wei, L., Yu, D., Fane, A.G., Wang, R. and Chen, Y. (2015) All-473 Carbon Nanoarchitectures as High-Performance Separation Membranes with Superior Stability. 474 Advanced Functional Materials 25(47), 7348-7359. 475 Guo, Y., Ying, Y., Mao, Y., Peng, X. and Chen, B. (2016) Polystyrene Sulfonate Threaded through a 476 Metal–Organic Framework Membrane for Fast and Selective Lithium-Ion Separation. Angewandte 477 Chemie International Edition 55(48), 15120-15124. 478 Han, Y., Xu, Z. and Gao, C. (2013) Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water 479 Purification. Advanced Functional Materials 23(29), 3693-3700. 480 Horike, S., Umeyama, D. and Kitagawa, S. (2013) Ion Conductivity and Transport by Porous 481 Coordination Polymers and Metal–Organic Frameworks. Accounts of Chemical Research 46(11), 482 2376-2384. 483 Huang, H., Song, Z., Wei, N., Shi, L., Mao, Y., Ying, Y., Sun, L., Xu, Z. and Peng, X. (2013) Ultrafast 484 viscous water flow through nanostrand-channelled graphene oxide membranes. 4, 2979. 485 Hung, W.-S., Tsou, C.-H., De Guzman, M., An, Q.-F., Liu, Y.-L., Zhang, Y.-M., Hu, C.-C., Lee, K.-R. and 486 Lai, J.-Y. (2014) Cross-Linking with Diamine Monomers To Prepare Composite Graphene Oxide-487 Framework Membranes with Varying d-Spacing. Chemistry of Materials 26(9), 2983-2990. 488 Joshi, R.K., Carbone, P., Wang, F.C., Kravets, V.G., Su, Y., Grigorieva, I.V., Wu, H.A., Geim, A.K. and 489 Nair, R.R. (2014) Precise and Ultrafast Molecular Sieving Through Graphene Oxide Membranes. 490 Science 343(6172), 752-754. 491 Jung, M., Kim, H., Baek, K. and Kim, K. (2008) Synthetic Ion Channel Based on Metal–Organic 492 Polyhedra. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 47(31), 5755-5757. 493
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
Karna, N.K., Rojano Crisson, A., Wagemann, E., Walther, J.H. and Zambrano, H.A. (2018) Effect of an 494 external electric field on capillary filling of water in hydrophilic silica nanochannels. Physical 495 Chemistry Chemical Physics 20(27), 18262-18270. 496 Liu, G., Jin, W. and Xu, N. (2015) Graphene-based membranes. Chemical Society Reviews 44(15), 497 5016-5030. 498 Majee, A., Bier, M. and Podgornik, R. (2018) Spontaneous symmetry breaking of charge-regulated 499 surfaces. Soft Matter 14(6), 985-991. 500 Marcos, C., Arango, Y.C. and Rodriguez, I. (2009) X-ray diffraction studies of the thermal behaviour of 501 commercial vermiculites. Applied Clay Science 42(3-4), 368-378. 502 Nebbia, G. and Menozzi, G.N. (1968) Early experiments on water desalination by freezing. 503 Desalination 5(1), 49-54. 504 Obut, A. and Girgin, İ. (2002) Hydrogen peroxide exfoliation of vermiculite and phlogopite. Minerals 505 Engineering 15(9), 683-687. 506 Oener, S.Z., Ardo, S. and Boettcher, S.W. (2017) Ionic Processes in Water Electrolysis: The Role of 507 Ion-Selective Membranes. ACS Energy Letters 2(11), 2625-2634. 508 Okada, T., Xie, G., Gorseth, O., Kjelstrup, S., Nakamura, N. and Arimura, T. (1998) Ion and water 509 transport characteristics of Nafion membranes as electrolytes. Electrochimica Acta 43(24), 3741-510 3747. 511 Orooji, Y., Liang, F., Razmjou, A., Li, S., Mofid, M.R., Liu, Q., Guan, K., Liu, Z. and Jin, W. (2017) 512 Excellent Biofouling Alleviation of Thermoexfoliated Vermiculite Blended Poly(ether sulfone) 513 Ultrafiltration Membrane. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9(35), 30024-30034. 514 Orooji, Y., Liang, F., Razmjou, A., Liu, G.P. and Jin, W.Q. (2018) Preparation of anti-adhesion and 515 bacterial destructive polymeric ultrafiltration membranes using modified mesoporous carbon. 516 Separation and Purification Technology 205, 273-283. 517 Pu, Q., Yun, J., Temkin, H. and Liu, S. (2004) Ion-Enrichment and Ion-Depletion Effect of Nanochannel 518 Structures. Nano Letters 4(6), 1099-1103. 519 Razmjou, A. (2019) The Role of Defects in Li+ Selective Nanostructured Membranes: Comment on 520 “Tunable Nanoscale Interlayer of Graphene with Symmetrical Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Architecture 521 for Lithium Extraction”. Advanced Materials Interfaces 6(2), 1801427. 522 Razmjou, A., Barati, M.R., Simon, G.P., Suzuki, K. and Wang, H.T. (2013a) Fast Deswelling of 523 Nanocomposite Polymer Hydrogels via Magnetic Field-Induced Heating for Emerging FO 524 Desalination. Environmental Science & Technology 47(12), 6297-6305. 525 Razmjou, A., Liu, Q., Simon, G.P. and Wang, H.T. (2013b) Bifunctional Polymer Hydrogel Layers As 526 Forward Osmosis Draw Agents for Continuous Production of Fresh Water Using Solar Energy. 527 Environmental Science & Technology 47(22), 13160-13166. 528 Razmjou, A., Simon, G.P. and Wang, H.T. (2013c) Effect of particle size on the performance of 529 forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent. Chemical 530 Engineering Journal 215, 913-920. 531 Salieb-Beugelaar, G.B., Dorfman, K.D., van den Berg, A. and Eijkel, J.C.T. (2009) Electrophoretic 532 separation of DNA in gels and nanostructures. Lab on a Chip 9(17), 2508-2523. 533 Shao, J.-J., Raidongia, K., Koltonow, A.R. and Huang, J. (2015) Self-assembled two-dimensional 534 nanofluidic proton channels with high thermal stability. Nat Commun 6. 535 Shirani, E., Razmjou, A., Tavassoli, H., Landarani-Isfahan, A., Rezaei, S., Kajani, A.A., Asadnia, M., Hou, 536 J.W. and Warkiani, M.E. (2017) Strategically Designing a Pumpless Microfluidic Device on an "Inert" 537 Polypropylene Substrate with Potential Application in Biosensing and Diagnostics. Langmuir 33(22), 538 5565-5576. 539 Su, Y., Kravets, V.G., Wong, S.L., Waters, J., Geim, A.K. and Nair, R.R. (2014) Impermeable barrier 540 films and protective coatings based on reduced graphene oxide. 5, 4843. 541 Sun, P., Wang, K. and Zhu, H. (2016) Recent Developments in Graphene-Based Membranes: 542 Structure, Mass-Transport Mechanism and Potential Applications. Advanced Materials 28(12), 2287-543 2310. 544
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21
Tagliazucchi, M. and Szleifer, I. (2015) Transport mechanisms in nanopores and nanochannels: can 545 we mimic nature? Materials Today 18(3), 131-142. 546 Valaskova, M. and Martynkova, G.S. (2013) Vermiculite: Structural Properties and Examples of the 547 Use. Clay Minerals in Nature - Their Characterization, Modification and Application, 209-238. 548 Walker, G. and Garrett, W. (1967) Chemical exfoliation of vermiculite and the production of colloidal 549 dispersions. Science 156(3773), 385-387. 550 Wang, P., Wang, M., Liu, F., Ding, S., Wang, X., Du, G., Liu, J., Apel, P., Kluth, P., Trautmann, C. and 551 Wang, Y. (2018) Ultrafast ion sieving using nanoporous polymeric membranes. Nature 552 Communications 9(1), 569. 553 Wen, Q., Yan, D., Liu, F., Wang, M., Ling, Y., Wang, P., Kluth, P., Schauries, D., Trautmann, C., Apel, P., 554 Guo, W., Xiao, G., Liu, J., Xue, J. and Wang, Y. (2016) Highly Selective Ionic Transport through 555 Subnanometer Pores in Polymer Films. Advanced Functional Materials 26(32), 5796-5803. 556 Winarto, Yamamoto, E. and Yasuoka, K. (2017) Water Molecules in a Carbon Nanotube under an 557 Applied Electric Field at Various Temperatures and Pressures. Water 9(7), 473. 558 Yoshizuka, K., Kitajou, A. and Holba, M. (2006) Selective recovery of lithium from seawater using a 559 novel MnO2 type adsorbent III - Benchmark evaluation. Ars Separatoria Acta 4, 78-85. 560 Zhang, H., Hou, J., Hu, Y., Wang, P., Ou, R., Jiang, L., Liu, J.Z., Freeman, B.D., Hill, A.J. and Wang, H. 561 (2018a) Ultrafast selective transport of alkali metal ions in metal organic frameworks with 562 subnanometer pores. Science Advances 4(2). 563 Zhang, H., Hou, J., Hu, Y., Wang, P., Ou, R., Jiang, L., Liu, J.Z., Freeman, B.D., Hill, A.J. and Wang, H. 564 (2018b) Ultrafast selective transport of alkali metal ions in metal organic frameworks with 565 subnanometer pores. Science Advances 4(2), eaaq0066. 566 Zhao, Y., Shi, W., Van der Bruggen, B., Gao, C. and Shen, J. (2018) Tunable Nanoscale Interlayer of 567 Graphene with Symmetrical Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Architecture for Lithium Extraction. Advanced 568 Materials Interfaces 5(6), 1701449. 569
570
571
572
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
22
573
Figure 1 typical VCT structural units (two magnesium aluminosilicate layers plus an interlayer space) (a), Raw VCT 574 crystals (b), VCT after thermal shock at 900
oC (c), Wide-angle XRD patterns of VCT crystals at different thermal shock 575
treatments (d), Adsorption-desorption isotherms of VCT crystals at a different temperature (e), and HRTEM of VCT flakes 576 after exfoliation (inset: a dispersion of VCT crystals in water) (f). 577
578
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
23
579
Figure 2 A flexible free-standing VCT membrane obtained by vacuum filtration (a), Cross-section AFM and FESEM images 580 of VCT membrane (b), 3D model and TEM images of nano-fluidic VCT membrane (c), and XRD patterns of raw and 581 exfoliated VCT flake (d). 582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
24
596
597
Figure 3 I-V curves of different electrolytic solutions indicating selective transportation of Li+ ions (a), Nyquist plots of 598
VCT membrane for different concentrations of LiCl electrolyte solutions E.I.S (b), the effect of membrane orientation on 599 the I-V performance of the membranes (c), a comparison between the I-V curves of VCT membrane and its commercial 600 counterparts (Nafion and CMI-7000S) (d), reduction in EC as a function of (e) time at fixed voltage of 12V and (f) applied 601 voltage over 2 hr of experiments for different LiCl solution indicating a great potential for Li
+ extraction. 602
603
604
605
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
25
606
607
Figure 4 Representative I-V curves of VCT membrane recorded at different pH (a), Proton conductivity as a function of 608 pH, which shows the deviation from bulk solution at low proton concentration indicating surface charge-governed-609 transport mechanism (b), and radial distribution function (RDF) and coordination number of Li and oxygen of water 610 inside nanochannel with channel dimension of 0.4 and 1.2nm (c and d), for 0.6 and 08 nm channel dimension please see 611 Figure S8 in supporting information. 612 613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26
624
625
626
Figure 5 Li+ ions transportation behavior and water molecules orientation inside VCT nanochannels with different inter-627
surface distance (1.2 V/nm). The MD simulation revealed that the Li+ ions jump between the surfaces of the 628
nanochannel when the inter-surface distance is in subnanometer range. 629
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
630
631
Figure 6 RDF of Li and Oxygen of VCT nanochannel surface (1.2 V/nm) inside nanochannel with different channel 632 dimension (a), the velocity of Li
+ ions inside 0.4 and 1.2 nm VCT nanochannel with different power density of electrical 633
field (b and c), and a comparison between the velocity of Li+ and that of Na
+, K
+ and Ca
2+ ions in 0.4 nm VCT nanochannel 634
with power density of 2 V/nm (d). 635
636
MAN
USCR
IPT
ACCE
PTED
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights
Li+ ion-selective membranes for mineral resource recovery are highly demanded
2D subnanofluidic hydrous phyllosilicate channels are used to prepare the membranes
The membrane showed alkali metal ion selectivity in the order of Li+> Na+>K+
For below 1 nm channels, Li+ conducted by jumping between 2D nanochannels walls
The Li+ selective membrane exhibited two-surface-charge-governed transport mechanism