+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Livable Centre 1

Livable Centre 1

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: pahlevi-noviandri
View: 17 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
learning about livable city
Popular Tags:
52
Community Design & Smart Growth: The LCI Experience Tom Weyandt Atlanta Regional Commission
Transcript
  • Community Design & Smart Growth:The LCI Experience

    Tom WeyandtAtlanta Regional Commission

  • ARC BoardPublic Members (23) Chair of the Board of County Commissioners from each of the 10

    counties Mayor from each of the 10 counties except Fulton Mayor from northern half of Fulton Mayor from southern half of Fulton Mayor, City of Atlanta Member of Atlanta City Council

    Members at Large (15) - Resident from each of 15 districts created by the legislative delegation from the Area, elected by public members of the Commission

    Non-voting Member appointed by DCA (1)

  • RDCs

  • EPA Non-Attainment Areas

  • Population Growth

    *Atlanta MSA was 12th in population in 1990; 11th in 2000; 9th in 2003; 4th in population increase, 1990-2000, and 1st in population increase between 2000 and 2006.

    2000 - 2006 2006 2000MSA # Rank* # Rank # RankAtlanta 890,242 1 5,138,223 9 4,247,981 11Dallas 842,423 2 6,003,967 4 5,161,544 5Houston 824,542 3 5,539,949 6 4,715,407 8Los Angeles 584,502 6 12,950,129 2 12,365,627 2New York 495,534 7 18,818,536 1 18,323,002 1Washington DC 494,217 8 5,290,400 8 4,796,183 7Miami 456,293 9 5,463,857 7 5,007,564 6Chicago 407,432 10 9,505,748 3 9,098,316 3Philadelphia 139,595 26 5,826,742 5 5,687,147 4Detroit 16,409 149 4,468,966 10 4,452,557 9

    MSA: Metropolitian Statistical Area (28-County Area)Source: U.S. Census

    Regional Growth

  • Source: U.S. Census; ARC

    10-County Population in 2006: 3,925,400

    That is greater

    than the

    population of

    24 states

    Source: ARC population estimates

    Regional Growth

  • Atlanta Urbanized Area 1950 - 2000How We Have Grown (To Where)

    2000

    1990

    1970

    1950

    Regional Growth

    Source: U.S. Census

  • Growth Going Everywhere

    Future

    HISTORICAL FUTURE

    Forecasting

  • Implications?

    Transportation:More Growth = More Congestion = More Money?

    Water:More Growth = More Water Demand = Greater Water Conservation?

    Land Development:More Growth = More Land Development = More Compact Development?

    Regional Issues

  • Livable Centers Initiative

  • Encourages local governments to plan and implement strategies in small areas that link transportation improvements with development strategies

    Planning grants provided to develop transportation efficient land use studies

    Program links implementation actions to transportation project funding

    Takes advantage of existing infrastructure to promote more dense mixed use development

    LCI Program Overview

  • Town centers and major activity centers provide:

    Significant existing transportation infrastructure

    Many centers ripe for more development

    Centers already contain some mix of uses and community facilities

    Can support multiple transportation modes

    Significant job and economic concentrations

    Increasingly buyers seeking to locate in centers

    Importance of Centers & Corridors

  • Provides need & justification for land use changes

    Identifies specific infrastructure needs & costs

    Provides details to prepare ordinances

    Provides more certainty for developers

    Establishes public support for plan and acceptance of new developments

    More informed and supportive elected officials

    Benefits of a Plan

  • $10 million over 10 years for studies

    $500 million for transportation funding

    86 Studies - 74 funded by ARC - 12 grandfathered

    33 supplemental studies

    $7.1 million in study funding

    $1.5 million in supplemental funding

    $132 million in transportation funding

    $140.6 million in total funding

    Study Funding

  • Atlanta 14

    Cherokee 4

    Clayton 5

    Cobb 11

    DeKalb 15

    Douglas 2

    Fayette - 2

    Fulton 14

    Gwinnett 11

    Henry 2

    Rockdale 1

    Outside 5

    Total 86

    Completed LCI Studies

  • The LCI developments result in: Over 62,000 residential units 9,492 hotel units Over 12 million sq ft of commercial retail space Over 40.2 million sq ft of office space

    Development Numbers

    LCI communities reported 722 developments: 363 are complete 176 are planned 150 under construction

  • City Center

  • City Center

    Georgia State Student Housing

  • City Center

    Twelve Centennial

  • City Center

    Georgia Aquarium

  • Perimeter Place Retail

  • Perimeter Place Retail

  • Perimeter Place Retail

  • Woodstock

  • Woodstock

  • Woodstock

  • Woodstock

  • Duluth Town Green

  • Duluth Town Green

  • Duluth Town Green

  • Chamblee Townhomes on MARTA Parking Lot

  • FY03 first year transportation funds available

    $132 million programmed between FY 2003-2011 for design, right-of-way and construction projects

    Funds distributed to 83 projects in 50 LCI communities

    28 projects are under construction or have been constructed to date

    31 projects are nearing construction having submitted 90% construction plans & approved ROW

    LCI Transportation Funding

  • Pedestrian Facilities 58%

    Multi-Use Trail 6%

    Bike/Ped Facility 14%

    Roadway Operations 9%

    Roadway Capacity 3%

    Transit Facilities 9%

    LCI Transportation Funding

  • Chamblee Pedestrian Crossings

  • Midtown Peachtree Pedestrian Improvements

  • PROJECT STATUS REPORT

    Sandy Springs Pedestrian Improvements

  • Decatur MARTA Plaza Redevelopment

  • 92% of communities have made (or in process of making) amendments to the local comprehensive plan

    49% of communities have prepared (or in process of preparing) a unique zoning district

    58% of communities have adopted (or in process of adopting) other development regulation changes/amendments

    43% of communities have prepared (or in process of preparing) regulations/programs focused on senior housing, workforce housing, or other special housing issues

    80% of communities have adopted (or in process of adopting) policies controlling architectural standards to ensure a livable, walkable environment

    Development Regulation Changes

  • Livability Survey

    LCI Livability Survey 2006

    Strongly Agree Agree

    Neither Agree or Disagree

    Disagree Strongly Disagree

    Not Applicable/ Unknown

    16% 36% 7.8% 2.0%

    15% 42% 1.3% 0.0%

    4% 25% 14.5% 5.0%

    11% 46% 9.7% 0.0%

    24% 39% 12% 0.0219% 5%

    Livability

    Bike/Ped

    Transit

    Housing/ EmploymentRegulations/

    Policies 62% 14%

    29% 11%

    28% 14%

    29% 24%

    18% 14%

    29% 19.0%

    58% 9.5%

    51% 9.5%

    57% 1.3%

    Survey questions asked local planners to identify their level of agreement that improvements have been achieved since the LCI plan was completed. Questions focused on the 5 themes below.

  • INDEX Modeling

    Computer modeling to measure impact of land use changes identified in LCI plans

    Measures existing development vs. LCI plan build-out

    INDEX software used with indicators focusing on 4 Ds:

    Density = percent change in pop/emp per sq mile

    Diversity = how diverse the study area is compared to the region

    Design = how complete the sidewalks and density of the street network

    Destinations = how accessible the study area is to the region

  • Lessons Learned

    Hapeville LCI Plan

  • Hapeville Build-Out Modeling

    INDICATOR Base LCI

    Population 3,099 9,579

    Employment 4,010 4,179

    Population Density 3.73 11.52

    Employment Density 15.34 14.22

    Street Route Directness 1.35 1.47

    Use Mix 0.12 0.32

    Use Balance 0.79 0.86

    Jobs to Housing Balance 2.96 0.93

    Single Family Share 83.2 40.9

    Multi Family Share 16.8 59.1

    Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3,559 3,256

    Home Based Vehicle Miles Traveled 4.8 4.3

  • Brookhaven LCI Plan

  • Brookhaven Build-Out Modeling

    INDICATOR Base LCI

    Population 9,327 13,817

    Employment 2,615 2,493

    Population Density 5.89 8.73

    Employment Density 13.95 12.73

    Street Route Directness 1.78 2.01

    Use Mix 0.11 0.2

    Use Balance 0.65 0.64

    Jobs to Housing Balance 0.65 0.4

    Single Family Share 87.4 58.2

    Multi Family Share 12.6 41.8

    Transit Oriented Residential Density 3.88 29.9

    Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions 4,066 4,021

    Home Based Vehicle Miles Traveled 6.1 6.1

  • Hwy 78 LCI Plan

  • Hwy 78 Build-Out Modeling

    INDICATOR Base LCI

    Population 4,172 11,384

    Employment 4,940 4,652

    Population Density 2.83 7.72

    Employment Density 11.55 12.81

    Street Route Directness 1.29 1.59

    Use Mix 0.11 0.26

    Use Balance 0.75 0.82

    Jobs to Housing Balance 2.97 0.88

    Single Family Share 77.6 27.3

    Multi Family Share 22.4 72.7

    Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions 5,868 5,241

    Home Based Vehicle Miles Traveled 11.1 9.9

  • Cumberland LCI Plan

  • Cumberland Build-Out Modeling

    INDICATOR Base LCI

    Population 578 15,104

    Employment 12,087 14,254

    Population Density 0.57 14.97

    Employment Density 46.69 31.22

    Street Route Directness 2.4 1.08

    Use Mix 0.03 0.61

    Use Balance 0.8 0.78

    Jobs to Housing Balance 41.2 1.89

    Single Family Share 0 0

    Multi Family Share 100 100

    Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3,409 2,045

    Home Based Vehicle Miles Traveled 4.3 2.6

  • MacFarland LCI Plan

  • MacFarland Build-Out Modeling

    INDICATOR Base LCI

    Population 635 21,261

    Employment 2,822 6,096

    Population Density 0.3 9.91

    Employment Density 6.48 11.02

    Street Route Directness 1.77 2.64

    Use Mix 0.02 0.41

    Use Balance 0.68 0.69

    Jobs to Housing Balance 10.78 0.66

    Single Family Share 100 33.1

    Multi Family Share 0 66.9

    Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions 4,739 3,146

    Home Based Vehicle Miles Traveled 8.1 5.4

  • Federal transportation funds offer flexibility to create LCI type programs

    LCI has allowed ARC to engage local governments in detailed planning

    Incentive to implement Regional Development Plan policies

    Smart Growth concepts have applicability in every place

    Change takes time

    Lessons Learned

  • Atlanta Regional Commission40 Courtland Street, NEAtlanta, Georgia 30303

    www.atlantaregional.com/lci(includes a copy of this presentation)

    Tom [email protected]

    404.463.3250

    For More Information

    ARC BoardPopulation Growth How We Have Grown (To Where)Growth Going EverywhereImplications?Importance of Centers & CorridorsBenefits of a PlanStudy FundingDevelopment NumbersDevelopment Regulation ChangesLivability SurveyINDEX ModelingLessons LearnedHapeville Build-Out ModelingBrookhaven Build-Out ModelingHwy 78 Build-Out ModelingCumberland Build-Out ModelingMacFarland Build-Out ModelingLessons Learned


Recommended