+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Livable Communities Overview

Livable Communities Overview

Date post: 06-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
52
1 APWA APWA International Congress and Expo International Congress and Expo Creating Livable Communities Creating Livable Communities Dave Zelenok Dave Zelenok Merrick & Company Manager Colorado Springs Office Director of Transportation & Public Works City of Colorado Springs [email protected] Livable Communities Livable Communities Overview Overview Smart Growth What it really means to Public Works Departments Housing Trends from Public Works’ Perspective Examples of Traditional Neighborhood Designs 2 New Urbanism Examples – Co-Housing Traffic Calming – Examples Lessons Learned Part I Smart Growth Part I Smart Growth… WHAT IS IT? WHAT IS IT? A profound change in community planning, A profound change in community planning, A A “flash in the pan, flash in the pan, ” or or – A A “wolf in sheep wolf in sheep’s clothing (?) s clothing (?)” Sooooooo…. . Who is in favor of Smart Growth?? Pro Growth Interests (Developers, Speculators, Financiers, etc.) Anti - Growth Interests (Neighborhoods, etc.) Downtown Interest Groups (Proponents of stadiums, CBD’s, etc.) Environmental Groups Who is opposed to Smart Growth?
Transcript

1

APWAAPWAInternational Congress and ExpoInternational Congress and Expo

Creating Livable CommunitiesCreating Livable CommunitiesDave ZelenokDave Zelenok

Merrick & Company Manager Colorado Springs Office

Director of Transportation & Public Works City of Colorado Springs

[email protected]

Livable CommunitiesLivable CommunitiesOverviewOverview

• Smart Growth – What it really means to Public Works Departments

• Housing Trends from Public Works ’ Perspective– Examples of Traditional Neighborhood Designs – 2 New Urbanism Examples– Co-Housing

• Traffic Calming – Examples

• Lessons Learned

Part I Smart GrowthPart I Smart Growth……WHAT IS IT?WHAT IS IT?

A profound change in community planning, A profound change in community planning, A A ““flash in the pan,flash in the pan, ”” or or ––

A A ““wolf in sheepwolf in sheep’’s clothing (?)s clothing (?)””• Sooooooo…..

• Who is in favor of Smart Growth??

– Pro Growth Interests (Developers, Speculators, Financiers, etc.)

– Anti - Growth Interests (Neighborhoods, etc.)

– Downtown Interest Groups (Proponents of stadiums, CBD’s, etc.)

– Environmental Groups

• Who is opposed to Smart Growth?

2

Smart Growth (?): Smart Growth (?): Colorado Springs Colorado Springs Past Decade: 4,000 Past Decade: 4,000 –– 5,000 new homes per year5,000 new homes per year

Colorado Springs:Colorado Springs:•• 150+ Square Miles, 400,000 People150+ Square Miles, 400,000 People

•• Pikes Peak RegionPikes Peak Region

•• Home of the U.S. Air Force AcademyHome of the U.S. Air Force Academy

•• America the Beautiful America the Beautiful –– ““Purple MountainPurple Mountain’’s Majestys Majesty…”…”

City GrowthCity Growth

Money Magazine: “Best Big City”

Forbes’ Most Liveable City

APMA: #2 Walking City

Men’s Fitness: #3 Fittest City

“In the last decade, the population of Colorado Springs has grown 30 percent,

topping half-million and making

Forbes Magazine’s ‘Steroid Cities’”

The Gazette, 21 Mar 06

Den

ver

60 M

i

3

Defining the ProblemDefining the Problem……

• Traffic Congestion • Crumbling urban infrastructure• High costs of new infrastructure• Loss of open space and

agricultural land • Mismatch of jobs, workers and

destinations• Disinvested communities• Fragmented local planning

• Growth will occur• Infrastructure will be expanded• Market conditions (e.g., supply, demand, quality) will

ultimately drive economic viability of the projects• Governments can – and –

must be willing to play a key role

Assumptions Assumptions

Common Tenets of Common Tenets of ““Smart GrowthSmart Growth””““Mom and Apple PieMom and Apple Pie…”…”

• Preservation of open space, resources and habitat

• Comprehensive planning– New town centers, transportation hubs,

compact/infill development

• Traditional/urban neighborhoods

• Governmental partnerships– city / county / state / federal – school district/ utilities – private sector

• Sense of place & community

4

Common Tenets of Smart Growth, Common Tenets of Smart Growth, concon’’tt. . “…“…Not so fastNot so fast””

• Regionalism – coordination among governments– Consolidation of local governments (e.g., Toronto)

• Roles of state and provincial governments strengthened– Legislation and regulatory guidance

• Citizen Participation• Plans, Plans and more Plans…

– Comprehensive Plans, Capital Improvement Plans – Long range public works, Fiscal Impact Analyses

• GIS• Shift from SOV’s to alternative modes • Transit friendly designs

– Statewide multi- modal plans– Pedestrian and bike accommodations– Street connectivity

Common Tenets of Smart Growth, Common Tenets of Smart Growth, concon’’tt..“…“…and thereand there’’s s moremore””

• Higher density and infill– Opposition from existing neighborhood groups

• Affordable Housing– Mixed income neighborhoods– Opposition from existing neighborhood groups

• Downtown Vitality• Land acquisition vs. agricultural products’ subsidies

– Land, water, open space acquisition entities• Biodiversity

– Urban Forest Management– Species Inventory & GIS mgt.

• Reduce Water Use• Minimize Habitat Fragmentation

Tools of the TradeTools of the Trade……• Urban infill and open space preservation• Reinvestment and redevelopment incentives

– Priority Funding Areas, CDBG, CMAQ, gov’t investment programs

• Historic place programs • Water availability and usage (rights’ conflicts?)

• Not-for profit boards, redevelopment authorities • School district coordination – multi-use facilities and Ped. Planning

• Regional stormwater management– Coordinated basin detention plans, recreation, open space, comp plans

• Housing incentives in targeted areas

• Open Space Preservation– Land trusts, greenways, drainageways– brownfields restoration, cemeteries

• Regional D.O.T. Planning (A+)• Cost of service (F.I.) $$$ studies

– Financial incentives / disincentives

5

Tools of the TradeTools of the Trade……Reducing traffic congestionReducing traffic congestion

• Improving the effectiveness of the transportation network

• Mixed land use– Reduces trip length – Helps offset increase in VMT vs. population– Pedestrian/bike amenities

• Transportation Demand Mgt• Reducing auto dependence and related infrastructure costs

• Traditional Neighborhood Designs• Roundabouts• Traffic Calming – chicanes, tables, geometry • Alleys, Narrower Streets > > Emergency vehicle response

• Street and highway design standards– Multi-modal boulevard design

• Transit Oriented Design– Station area planning, SOV’s, LRV’s, BRT’s, RR’s – Rubber-tired mass/paratransit

Part II Part II -- Emerging TrendsEmerging Trends -- Housing Housing

• Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TND’s)• Median Size: 1,500 - 2,000+ SF• Often Lacking…

– Continuity with other neighborhoods, schools, employment centers,

– Mass transit, pedestrian and – Alternative modes amenities– Affordability– Recreation centers– Inclusiveness and diversity

• Still automobile-centric– one and two car garages, often detached,

but still in typical suburban settings

Traditional Neighborhood DesignTraditional Neighborhood Design

6

Traditional Neighborhood DesignTraditional Neighborhood Design……..

Traditional Neighborhood DesignTraditional Neighborhood Design……..

4,000 SF lots, 4,000 SF lots, vsvs 66--8,0008,000

Minimal Front Yards, but > > porchesMinimal Front Yards, but > > porches

OnOn--street parking, often one waystreet parking, often one way

Reduced rightsReduced rights --ofof--way (20way (20’’ curbcurb--toto--curb) and curb) and infrastructure per unit, increased infrastructure per unit, increased infrastructure and traffic volumes per acre (?!)infrastructure and traffic volumes per acre (?!)

Increased densityIncreased density

Minimal setback (15Minimal setback (15--2020’’))

Increased prices (?!)Increased prices (?!)

Traditional Neighborhood DesignTraditional Neighborhood DesignSingle Family Single Family –– ““CottagesCottages””

What?? Narrow Streets and no Driveways! (?)

7

Traditional Neighborhood DesignTraditional Neighborhood DesignSingle Family Single Family –– As BuiltAs Built

Hint: Look Closely Hint: Look Closely –– DrivewalksDrivewalks (?)(?)

“…“…Around BackAround Back””Attached garages, with driveways and alleysAttached garages, with driveways and alleys

Porches…

8

Minimal setbacks Small yards, Wider sidewalks, front…

? Note Steps to sidewalk

And - back

Note: Size of Back Yard

Detached Garages, some with “carriage houses”

•Access exposed to elements

? Note: More Steps

GOODBYE GARAGES AS YOU KNOW ‘EM

9

Carriage House Above Unfinished Garage: Carriage House Above Unfinished Garage: Studio, office or bedroomStudio, office or bedroom

Alleys, little curb/gutterAlleys, little curb/gutter

2 and 3 car detached garages 2 and 3 car detached garages

““Carriage housesCarriage houses””

Little curb/gutterLittle curb/gutter

Reverse Reverse SuperelevationSuperelevation

Drainage and Icing ProblemsDrainage and Icing Problems

10

Detached twoDetached two--car duplex garage structurescar duplex garage structures

Enclaves and subEnclaves and sub--urban settingsurban settings……

…… Some with both onSome with both on--street parking in front street parking in front and NO garages out backand NO garages out back

11

Two car detached garage

Forget the classic Forget the classic -- twotwo--car garagecar garage

Now Now -- Tandem garagesTandem garages

Note

Front Porches Facing Common Area

Front Porches Facing Sides of Neighbors, Note: No streets in sight

12

The Corner Lot of the Future (?)

`̀Speaking of Streets…Note: the width and setbacks

20’ wide two-way streets…Parking on both sides

Q: Low budget constructionAffordable Housing or -Traffic Calming (?)

13

`̀Speaking of Streets…Note: the width and setbacks

Check this one out…

`̀Note: the width and setbacks

Yes, they’ re really THAT narrow…

? NO

PARKING

? NO PARKING

? NO PARKING

? NO PARKING? NO PARKING

?

? NO PARKING? NO PARKING

? NO PARKING

?N

O P

AR

KIN

G

Plenty of Free Parking…

28 NO PARKING Signs in One Location

14

Issues Include:üDrainageüParkingüStreet WidthüIcingüUrban BoundariesüEmployment CentersüMass TransitüEtc…

New City Development Code Needed

Brownfield Redevelopment

15

Public Meeting Space

Mailroom & Coffee Shoppe

Part IIIPart IIINew Urbanism New Urbanism

IllustrationsIllustrations

Lowell NeighborhoodLowell NeighborhoodColorado SpringsColorado Springs

BelmarBelmarLakewood, ColoradoLakewood, Colorado

The Mall of the Future (?)

16

Lowell NeighborhoodLowell NeighborhoodColorado SpringsColorado Springs

11--SchoolSchool

22--Mixed UseMixed Use

44--Granny FlatsGranny Flats

5 5 –– Sr. Apts.Sr. Apts.

33--FlatsFlats

Police HQPolice HQ

Urban Villages…

17

Mixed Use Mixed Use –– residential lofts and commercialresidential lofts and commercial

Commercial / Office

Residential Lofts

18

Streetscapes: wide sidewalks

Minimal Surface Parking

Integral Traffic Calming -

Modified Roundabout / Chicane Intersection: Town Square Concept

19

Downtown Residential Community: “Flats”

Note – Reduced Street Width

““Granny FlatsGranny Flats””

••Guest SuitesGuest Suites

••Efficiency Efficiency AptsApts

••OfficesOffices

Duplex Units over 2-car garages: “Granny Flats”

20

Mixed Use

Employment Center

Senior Citizens’ Apts…

Formerly – The Villa Italia Mall….

Retail Streets

ResidentialPublic Meeting Space

Transit

Parking Garages

21

Retail Formerly in the Mall

Residential Lofts Above

Retail Formerly in the Mall Below

Public Meeting Space

Bowling Theatre

22

And nowAnd now ––TNDTND’’ss ““Next GenerationNext Generation”” (?)(?)

““CoCo--HousingHousing””•Approx 100 Existing Projects

•100 Co-Housing Projects under development

•24 States/provinces

•8 – 67 Units Existing

•Senior Only Co-Housing Projects

•3 Existing Projects

•15 Seniors-Only under development

•Cohousing Association: www.cohousing.org`

……lots of lots of ““CoCommon Spacemmon Space””

…where you’re supposed to drive on the sidewalksQ: Traffic Calming or new pedestrian facilities?

23

And wide boulevardsAnd wide boulevards……

Are a relics of the pastMore - traffic calming

<- - - - - - - - - - - - Note: 20-foot street - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >

……and share a and share a ““CoCommon Housemmon House””

……where guests can staywhere guests can stay

24

……and have supper togetherand have supper together

……And share the chores And share the chores ---- fairly (?)fairly (?)

……and a and a ““Common Common HouseHouse””

……And everybodyAnd everybody’’s s cooocooo--happy happy --all the time (?)all the time (?)

25

The statsThe stats……•• 4 Acres4 Acres•• 34 units34 units•• Cost Cost -- $350K ($100K over median)$350K ($100K over median)•• Size: 2,000 Size: 2,000 –– 3,000 SF (Cost/SF 3,000 SF (Cost/SF –– 2x)2x)•• Garages Garages -- $10K / space, Carports $10K / space, Carports -- $6K$6K•• 1.5 spaces per unit1.5 spaces per unit•• Association dues Association dues -- $190 / month$190 / month•• Dining Dining –– VoluntaryVoluntary•• Sold outSold out•• Minimal infrastructureMinimal infrastructure•• Good for Public Works Good for Public Works •• Coming to a community near you (?) Coming to a community near you (?)

New Urbanism & Smart Growth:Emerging Trends

•Median Size: 1,500 - 2,000+ SF•Enclaves, often lacking continuity with:

•Other neighborhoods and schools •Employment centers •Mass transit and alternative modes links•Affordability•Recreation centers

•Still automobile-centric•Still in typical suburban settings

From local governmentFrom local government’’s s perspective... Lessons Learnedperspective... Lessons Learned

• Planning must be regional and comprehensive• Market forces and lifestyle choices drive both demand and

financial support • One size won’t fit all

– What’s “smart” in Colorado Springs might be “dumb” in New York• “Smart growth” is embraced by everybody:

– No & pro-growth, pro-downtown, environmental • Policies must be crafted at the local level• Set your “sights” low• Change the zoning codes• Builders sell what sells

– New trends always emerging– Listen for “Traditional” in ads

• Try to achieve Smarter Growth

26

Lessons LearnedLessons Learned““15 15 Ways to Fix the SuburbsWays to Fix the Suburbs”” by Peter by Peter CalthorpeCalthorpe

• Give up Big Lawns• Bring back the Corner Store• Make the Streets Skinny• Drop the Cul-de-sac• Draw Boundaries• Hide the Garage• Mix Housing Types• Plant Trees Curbside• Put New Life into Old Malls• Plan for Mass Transit• Link Work to Home• Make a Towne Centre• Shrink Parking Lots• Turn Down the Lights• Think “Green”

Part IV Part IV –– Traffic CalmingTraffic Calming

• Function• Design• Lessons Learned

Roundabouts in Vail, Colorado – Interstate 70

RoundaboutsRoundabouts

•• Safety Safety -- Reduction in accidents, slower Reduction in accidents, slower speeds and reduced conflict pointsspeeds and reduced conflict points

•• Low Maintenance Low Maintenance -- Compared to traffic Compared to traffic signals and electricity cost are reducedsignals and electricity cost are reduced

•• Reduced Delay Reduced Delay -- Yielding at entry rather Yielding at entry rather than stopping and waiting for a green lightthan stopping and waiting for a green light

•• Capacity Capacity -- All vehicles turn rightAll vehicles turn right

27

Roundabouts Roundabouts –– Yeah, buttsYeah, butts……• Additional right-of-way required• High cost to implement• Pedestrian crossing problems• Emergency response time slower• Driver confusion – New double roundabout –

Highest Accident Rate in City• Speed Reductions: 2-6 mph (Triple)

Lake AvenueLake Avenue

Roundabouts – and National Security (?)

•90 – foot diameter

•Single Lane

•Apron

Main Gate – Fort Carson, Colorado

Protection from gate-runners

28

üApron – Key Feature

üLow accident rate

Double Roundabout - -

Highest Accident Rate in City

Excellent Pedestrian Delineation

29

Lessons LearnedLessons Learned1. Traffic Control Device DON’TS:• Don’t install Temporary Devices unless

you can live with them for a long time• Don’t use new signals/stop signs

without warrants• Don’t expect speed limit signs or spot

enforcement to reduce speeds for long

2 - Roundabouts can be effective if:ADT is reasonably balancedDesign requires ALL vehicles to slowDelineated: Signs and MarkingsPedestrians: “low & outside”Double Lanes – Extra CautionGet some professional help Drainage/Snow RemovalWork with the neighbors, look for partnersAvoid Double Roundabouts in early years

BIGGERBIGGER is BETTER

30

3. 3. ““NeighborhoodsNeighborhoods””Think carefully about how to Think carefully about how to define the define the ““NeighborhoodNeighborhood”” ..Groups will form based on impactGroups will form based on impact

1. Recipients of 1. Recipients of ““new trafficnew traffic””Distributed over several streetsDistributed over several streets

2. Nearby but ambivalent2. Nearby but ambivalent

3. Directly on Cut3. Directly on Cut--through streetthrough street

4. Cut4. Cut--through users: Status Quo through users: Status Quo Uninvolved unless motivatedUninvolved unless motivated

4. Time4. Time

Neighborhood Survey

Identify Identify problemproblem

ExploreExploreOptionsOptions

Agree on Agree on SolutionSolution

TestTestSolutionSolution

5. Know the Vehicles5. Know the Vehicles

•• Early concern: Fire vehicles: Maneuverable Early concern: Fire vehicles: Maneuverable and Mountable Designsand Mountable Designs

•• FD response time: gate keys FD response time: gate keys –– unneededunneeded•• Eventual problems: Eventual problems:

––School busesSchool buses––Snow plows Snow plows ––Street sweepersStreet sweepers––Garbage trucksGarbage trucks

31

6. Designs6. DesignsGood planning /street layoutsBalance Traffic Loads –

“equal distribution of dissatisfaction”

Schools: Pedestrian Safety

7. Partner7. Partner

Lessons LearnedLessons Learned

Traffic Calming DO’S:Do - double the amount of time you think you think you need to gain consensusDO - decide what you want to achieve–

lower speeds, volumes OR happy neighbors?

DO – assign one Point of Contact per neighborhood

DO – gain political support for the PROCESS before focusing on SOLUTIONS

32

8. Strange, but True Stories8. Strange, but True Stories……Measuring SuccessMeasuring Success

••Sometimes approaches with no technical Sometimes approaches with no technical effectiveness (e.g., speed and volumes) effectiveness (e.g., speed and volumes) are wellare well--received by neighborhoodsreceived by neighborhoods

••Speed Limit Sign Changes:Speed Limit Sign Changes:Carlson Drive Carlson Drive –– 25mph RAISED to 30mph25mph RAISED to 30mph

Speeds Speeds droppeddropped 2 mph2 mphMirage Drive Mirage Drive –– 30 mph RAISED to 3530 mph RAISED to 35

Speeds Speeds dropped dropped 2.5 mph2.5 mph……Hummmmmmm…..

Voluntary Speed ReductionVoluntary Speed Reduction

““Neighbors working Neighbors working together to reduce together to reduce neighborhood neighborhood speeding through speeding through public awareness.public awareness.””

9. Measuring Success9. Measuring Success•• Placebo effect Placebo effect •• Process is sometimes a solution in itself.Process is sometimes a solution in itself.•• ““PERCEPTIONS CAN BE REALITYPERCEPTIONS CAN BE REALITY””

Calming Our StreetsA Handbook on Traffic Calming for ExistingNeighborhoods

City of Colorado SpringsTraffic Engineering

October 1998

33

Livable CommunitiesLivable CommunitiesOverviewOverview

• Smart Growth – What it really means to Public Works Departments

• Housing Trends from Public Works ’ Perspective– Examples of Traditional Neighborhood Designs – 2 New Urbanism Examples– Co-Housing

• Traffic Calming – Examples

• Lessons Learned

Credits & for more informationCredits & for more information……

• State Offices of Smart Growth– Colorado Smart Growth:

• Neighborhoods, Opportunity, Landscapes, Moving Forward• http://www.state.co.us/smartgrowth

• American Planning Association• National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education• Urban Land Institute • American Public Works Association• Beth Denniston, Director, RTAP• Saleem Khattak / City Public Works• Lowell Development Partners, LLC• Morey Bean, AIA, Colorado ’s Architect of the Year• Gold Hill Mesa, Bob Willard

Creating Livable CommunitiesCreating Livable CommunitiesDave ZelenokDave Zelenok

Merrick & Company Colorado Springs Office Managerwww.merrick.com

Director of Transportation & Public Works City of Colorado Springs

• Member of APWA’s Transportation CommitteeSmart Growth Subcommittee

[email protected]

FINAL Q&AFINAL Q&A

34

FINAL Q&AFINAL Q&ANext UP: John German, Vice President

PBS&J - San Antonio, TX, APWA Board of Directors –

Engrg & TechDirector of Public Works

San Antonio & Austin, TX

1

Creating Livable CommunitiesPresentation at 2007 APWA Congress

In San Antonio

By John L. German, P.E.Vice President, PBS&JSan Antonio, Texas

Boulder, Colorado

Creating Livable Communities

• Purpose of this Session– To learn about state-of -the-art

traffic engineering techniques and smart growth concepts that are aimed at improving a sense of community, enhancing neighborhood safety, and reducing traffic volumes and speeds.

– To learn more about Context Sensitive Solutions and consider one or more case studies that illustrate such solutions.

Creating Livable Communities

Competing Interests

• Planners and architects want to improve the image and aesthetics of streets and public spaces

• Per Sinclair Black, Austin Planner, they want to return downtown streets to pedestrians

• In the past, streets were largely dominated by vehicles.

• In the future, streets will be more pedestrian oriented

2

A Planner’s View of Streets

Creating Livable Communities

Competing Interests

• Traffic engineers and public works professionals want to move traffic expeditiously and in large volumes

• Generally arterial and collector streets perform this function

• In urban settings, we often have both arterials and local streets carrying traffic and providing access

• Residents and general public want local streets to have low volumes and low speeds “in their front yard”

• Many conflicts arise when residential streets also carry high volumes of traffic or have high operating speeds

• In these cases, “traffic calming” is often required

Arterial Street for Moving Traffic

3

Creating Livable Communities

Traffic CalmingITE Definition of Traffic Calming

• Traffic Calming is the combination of mainly physical measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior and improve conditions for non- motorized street users.1

Traffic calming objectives include: • achieving slow speeds for motor vehicles, • reducing collision frequency and severity, • increasing the safety and the perception of safety for non-motorized users of

the streets, • reducing the need for police enforcement, • enhancing the street environment (e.g., street scaping), • encouraging water infiltration into the ground, • increasing access for all modes of transportation, and • reducing cut-through motor vehicle traffic.1

• 1Lockwood, Ian. ITE Traffic Calming Definition. ITE Journal, July 1997, pg. 22.

Creating Livable CommunitiesRoundabouts

Creating Livable CommunitiesOther Traffic Calming Examples

4

FHWA Scanning Tour to Europe in 2000Context Sensitive Solutions

APWA Participated• Fifteen (15) highway and public

works engineers made the trip• John Okamoto, now the At-Large

Director for Transportation on the APWA Board, and John German represented APWA

• Toured Denmark, Sweden, Holland, Germany and Great Britain to study the use of Context Sensitive Solutions in the planning, development and operation of their highways and major roadways

• Concept not well known at the time, but traffic calming was common in the U.S.

• See this website for more info:http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/csd/index.cfm

FHWA Website Info• What is CSS• CSS is a collaborative, interdisciplinary approach that involves all stakeholders to develop a

transportation facility that fits its physical setting and preserves scenic, aesthetic, historic and environmental resources, while maintaining safety and mobility.CSS is an approach that considers the total context within which a transportation improvement project will exist. CSS principles include the employment of early, continuous and meaningful involvement of the public and a ll stakeholders throughout the project development process.

• SAFETEA-LU Section 6008.Section 109(c) (2) of title 23, USC includes con sideration of identified documents and materials that define the core principles of context sensitive solutions (CSS) by eight "Characteristics of the process that yield excellence" and seven "Qualities that characterize excellence in transportation design". The SAFETEA-LU provisions requiring opportunities for involvement of the pub lic and participating agencies in the development of project purpose and need and the range of alternatives support the intent of these CSS principles. The implementation of a CSS approach to navigating the project d evelopment process will ensure the best possible outcome to the environmental review process.

• Principles of Context Sensitive Design• History/Background • History• Legal Background• Planning

– Agency Challenges to Integrating Context Sensitive Solutions– Integration of Context Sensitive Solutions in the Transportation Planning Process– CSS & Planning Q&A's

• Safety• Smart Growth and FHWA• Environment• NEPA• Human Environment• Public Involvement• Transportation Enhancements• Value Engineering

Creating Livable Communities

Context Sensitive SolutionsWikipedia Definition

Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) is a theoretical and practical approach to transportation decision-making and design that takes into consideration the communities and lands which streets, roads, and highways pass through ("the context").

The term is closely related to but distinguishable from Context Sensitive Design in that it asserts that all decisions in transportation planning, project development, operations and maintenance should be responsive to the context in which these activities occur, not simply the design process.

CSS seeks to balance the need to move vehicles efficiently and safely with other desirable outcomes, including historic preservation, environmental sustainability, and the creation of vital public spaces.

5

Creating Livable Communities

Context Sensitive Solutions

What is the difference?

Traffic Calming Context Sensitive Design

Creating Livable CommunitiesContext Sensitive Solutions

vs. Traffic Calming

Why not a full closure?

Fort Collins, Colorado Downtown Street

Eliminate parking and move traffic or give parking a priority over traffic movement??

Creating Livable CommunitiesContext Sensitive Solutions vs.

Traffic Calming

Why not a full closure?

Del Mar, California Main Street

Pave the full ROW or provide landscaping, trees, and medians??

6

Creating Livable CommunitiesContext Sensitive Solutions

vs. Traffic Calming

Why not a full closure?

Pearl Street Shopping Area and Pedestrian Way--Boulder

Creating Livable Communities

Tradeoffs

Congestion Delays

Increased travel time

Context Sensitive Drainage Design ??

7

Creating Livable CommunitiesTraffic Calming/ CSS Case Study

• Alamo Heights High School Traffic Impact on the Sylvan Hills Neighborhood– Northeast area of San Antonio between

Broadway and North New Braunfels– Older, gentrified, upper end neighborhood– Limited east west arterial streets in the area– City of Alamo Heights wanted to resolve long

standing dispute between AHISD and residents over neighborhood traffic problems

Sylvan Hills Neighborhood

Alamo Heights High School

Traffic Issues in the Neighborhood

• High School traffic using area streets to reach school & exit

• Parking in the neighborhood • High School Stadium event

traffic and parking • Other cross town, cut -through

traffic on east-west streets, Claywell and Oakview

• Speeding was occurring on the neighborhood streets

• Long standing, unresolved issues Castano

ClaywellOakwell

Stadium

AH High School

8

Other Traffic and Parking Problems

• Problems with E. Fair Oaks (a one-way street with High school parking on either side) exiting onto residential streets- including Fair Oaks, Vanderhoeven, and other streets

• Traffic circulating around the block onto Elmview to get from High School back to Broadway

• Overflow parking occurring in the neighborhood on Vanderhoeven, Halcyon, Retama, and Elmview

• Traffic Congestion on Castano near Broadway next to High School due to curb parking, parents dropping off students, and bus loading and unloading in the street

Impacts of Stadium Parking on Neighborhood

• Traffic cutting through neighborhood

• Congestion• Unwanted parking on

area streets• Debris on streets after

events• Problems for fire, police

and EMS to reach residences

• Noise• Vandalism• Lights shining into homes• Confrontations between

home owners and visitors• Damage to lawns and

landscaping

Stadium Event Traffic and Parking Problems

9

Summary of Issues

• Neighborhood leaders could not get AHISD officials to make changes to the street network and traffic patterns.

• AHISD officials believed that the current traffic and parking problems were not significant.

• The City of A.H. wanted to resolve the current problems.

• PBS&J was asked to prepare plans that would resolve each group’s concerns.

• Mayor and City Manager facilitated meetings to begin the dialogue.

PBS&J Planning Process

• Met with AHISD and the High School staff and students to determine their issues regarding parking and traffic flow

• Helped them to understand the neighbors’ concerns

• Identified a shortage of school parking

• Determined traffic signals were needed to help school staff and students get onto busy arterials

• Learned that the northern boundary street of the High School needed to be two-way and more on street parking was needed on that street.

• Looked at a variety of traffic calming solutions to protect the neighborhood from these traffic elements

• Jointly studied the Stadium impacts on the neighborhood

10

PBS&J Planning Process (Cont.)

• Met with neighborhood group on many occasions to review their Plans and to understand their issues

• Reviewed Sylvan Hills Neighborhood Plan and relevant traffic data

• Studied the geometrics around the High School and on the boundary streets

• Met individual leaders of the various groups to consider a variety of options

• Divided the planning into three focus areas– the High School traffic

related Issues – the cut through and

speeding issues on neighborhood streets

– the Stadium problems • Looked at a variety of

traffic calming solutions to protect the neighborhood from these traffic elements

Elements of the Sylvan Hills Neighborhood Plan

•Reinforce the boundaries of the residential community.•Confine high school traffic to the high school. •Redirect cut-through traffic to the thoroughfares.•Install traffic calming devices.

Alamo Heights High School

Sylvan Hills Traffic Plan

11

Sylvan Hills Traffic Plan

Sylvan Hills Traffic Plan

12

Sylvan Hills Traffic Plan

Sylvan Hills Traffic Plan

Sylvan Hills Traffic Plan

13

Sylvan Hills Neighborhood Traffic Improvements Plan

Presentation

By John L. German, P.E.and Joan Hudson, P.E.

January 28, 2003

PBS&J

RecommendationsAlamo Heights High School Area• Convert 100 Block of Fair Oaks to two way traffic

• Add new Traffic Signals at Broadway and E. Fair Oaks• Construct landscaped traffic islands at Vanderhoeven

and Fair Oaks to direct traffic south on Vanderhoeven and away from the neighborhood

• Construct landscaped islands on Vanderhoeven from Castano to north of Halcyon, at Retama, and south and north of Fair Oaks.

• Add new traffic signals at Vanderhoeven and Castano

• Eliminate parallel parking (10 spaces) on Castano at High School to allow student unloading and bus parking

Add Signals

Construct LandscapedTraffic Islands to ProhibitAccess to neighborhood streets

Recommended Changes at High School

Convert to two-way traffic

Widen VanderhoevenXXXXXX

Add traffic signal At Broadway

Construct median

14

Add Landscaped Islands on

Vanderhoeven

• Prohibit traffic in neighborhood

• Maintain flexibility for AHISD

• Allow emergencyaccess

X

X

Construct landscaped traffic Islands

Prohibit traffic in neighbor-hood

X

High School Parking and Stadium Events

• Add Landscaped Islands on Vanderhoeven North of Castano toBlock turns into 200 Block of Halcyon, Retama, and Fair Oaks

X

Changes on Castano at High School

New Driveway Not Feasible

Remove 10 ParallelParking Spaces to AllowStudent Unloading and Bus Parking

15

Recommendationson Neighborhood Streets

Install Chicanes and/or Speed Cushions in Mid-block Locations on selected Streets

RecommendationsInstall Half-closures at

Some Intersections along Broadway and N. New Braunfels

• Prohibits entry to the subdivision but allows exiting traffic

• Adds landscaping• Minimal disruption to

homes on the corner• Discourages cut-

through traffic

Typical

Half-Closure Design

16

Other Traffic Recommendations

• Resolve parking issues on area streets• Widen Castano from Vanderhoeven to New

Braunfels to improve traffic flow and add parking• Remove NB left turn lane and signal phase on

New Braunfels at Claywell• Add NB left turn Phase on New Braunfels at

Castano (City of San Antonio)• Prohibit SB left turns from Broadway to Claywell,

Oakview, Edgewood, and Elmview

Resolve Parking Issues

Problems:ü Parking all over the

neighborhoodü Litter left on streets and

in yardsü Driveways blockedü No parking for

neighborhood residents

Recommendation:

§Prohibit parking on one side of all streets§Clean up after all events§Enforce traffic and parking laws

Summary of Recommendations

Speed Cushions Speed Cushions

losures

Speed Cushions

Add All-way Stop

Speed Cushions

Mid-block ChicanesSpeed Cushions

Median

Median

Construct Traffic Islands

Convert to two-way Traffic

AddTrafficSignals

Prohibit SBLeft TurnsOn Broadway

Improve NB Left Turns

Prohibit NB LeftTurns

Speed Cushions Mid-block Chicanes

Mid-block Chicanes

Eliminate Parallel ParkingAnd Provide Student Unloading and Bus Parking Widen Castano

Speed Cushions

Speed Cushions

Add Signals

17

Lessons Learned

• High schools and neighborhoods do not mix well

• Stadiums should not be located in neighborhoods

• A multi-jurisdictional approach is often required to address traffic conflicts

• Context Sensitive Solutions require citizen involvement, dedicated effort, and patience

• Extensive time is needed to understand neighborhood issues and inform them of viable options

Lessons Learned (Cont.)

• Using residential streets for major traffic movement will cause people problems

• Limited arterial systems and grid patterns encourage cut through traffic

• Speeding to a resident is different than to a motorist

• Traffic calming is warranted in adverse situations

• New subdivisions should be designed to avoid cut through traffic and speeding in neighborhoods

Creating Livable CommunitiesPresentation at 2007 APWA Congress

In San Antonio

By John L. German, P.E.Vice President, PBS&JSan Antonio, Texas210 828 [email protected]

Questions??

18


Recommended