+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback using a Normative ......BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. &...

Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback using a Normative ......BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. &...

Date post: 05-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com A new method for brain imaging was constructed by combining the sLORETA localization algorithm with a reference database. Using this approach, it is possible to reconstruct brain electrical activity in real-time, and produce accurate 3-D images of brain activation in a range of EEG component bands. All 6,238 voxels of brain activity are computed in real- time (8 frames per second) in 8 frequency bands, and converted into z-scores reflecting the instantaneous current-source density compared to a normative population. Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction References References References References Contact Information BrainMaster BrainMaster BrainMaster BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. Technologies, Inc. Technologies, Inc. Technologies, Inc.: www.brainmaster.com Thomas F. Collura: [email protected] John, E. R., Prichep, L.S. & Eaton, P. (1987). Normative data banks and neurometrics: Basic concepts, methods and results of norm construction. In A. Remond (ed.), Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology: Vol. III. Computer analysis of the EEG and other neurophysiological signals (pp. 449-495). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pascual-Marqui, R.D. (2002). Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography sLORETA): technical details. Methods & Findings in Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology. 24D:5-12 Bonstetter, R., Collura, T. F., Bonstetter, B.J., & Hebets, D., (2012a). Trait and state-based depression indicators measured using sLORETA imaging and quantification. Presented at the 2012 meetinf of the International Pharmaco-EEG Group (IPEG), New York, New York, November, 2012. Bonstetter, R., Collura, T. F., Hebets, D., & Bonstetter, B.J. (2012b). Uncovering the belief behind the action. Neuroconnections, Winter 2012, 20-23 General Motors, Inc. (2013). 2014 Corvette Stingray Biometric Test Drive. Accessed from http://vimeo.com/channels/corvette. Peper, E. & Hall, H. (2013) Sufi self-piercing with EEG monitoring demonstration. Presented at the 2013 meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, March 15, Portland, Oregon. Left Left Left Left: Focal deficit in Broca’s Area in an elderly individual with a speech deficiency. BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. & Brain Enrichment Center Thomas F. Collura Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback using a Normative Database 2. Isolation of Brain Functional 2. Isolation of Brain Functional 2. Isolation of Brain Functional 2. Isolation of Brain Functional Regions Regions Regions Regions 1. Individual State Patterns 1. Individual State Patterns 1. Individual State Patterns 1. Individual State Patterns 3. Complementary Activation 3. Complementary Activation 3. Complementary Activation 3. Complementary Activation – Sender & Receiver Sender & Receiver Sender & Receiver Sender & Receiver 4. 4. 4. 4. Ipsative Ipsative Ipsative Ipsative Responses to Cues Responses to Cues Responses to Cues Responses to Cues Methodology Methodology Methodology Methodology The sLORETA algorithm was described by Pascual- Marqui (2002), and the normative reference is based on the database first described by John et al. (2000). The examples that follow demonstrate its dynamic functionality. Above: A live reconstruction and imaging using sLORETA. It depicts training within the Cingulate Gyrus. Above Above Above Above: Genardi’s Default Mode Network shown within 3-D reconstruction using a normative database. Above: Z-scores reflecting the instantaneous current-source density compared to a normative population within Regions of Interest (ROI) and Network Z-Scores. Above Above Above Above: Dominant gamma wave activity in the left prefrontal cortex signifies acceptance & increased activity in the right represents avoidance (Bonstetter, et al., 2012a; Bonstetter, et al., 2012b). Using BrainAvatar™, the process examines the asymmetry in the prefrontal cortex identifying gamma wave bursts to assess the underlying subconscious decisions behind these self-reported responses, at the very moment of decision-making. This process provides scientific evidence that an evoked emotionally laden response results in corresponding brain activity and exposes the match to self reported explanations. The process documents both the intensity of human emotional response as well as the directionality of the response. Specific results are shown demonstrating the ability of this technique to isolate brain functional regions including networks and hubs, as a function of instantaneous brain state. In other cases of extreme performance, individual patterns reflecting states of awareness, caution, and emotional tone were recognized. Another example, in a case of energy healing, showed a unique pattern of complementary activation between the sender and receiver. In one case of extreme pain control, a hub of awareness was detected at the -3.0 z- score level. In this image of gamma activity, a profound excess is found in the mesiotemporal regions, corresponding to an internalized state
Transcript
Page 1: Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback using a Normative ......BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. & Brain Enrichment Center Thomas F. Collura Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

A new method for brain imaging was constructed by

combining the sLORETA localization algorithm with a

reference database. Using this approach, it is

possible to reconstruct brain electrical activity in

real-time, and produce accurate 3-D images of brain

activation in a range of EEG component bands. All

6,238 voxels of brain activity are computed in real-

time (8 frames per second) in 8 frequency bands,

and converted into z-scores reflecting the

instantaneous current-source density compared to a

normative population.

IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction

ReferencesReferencesReferencesReferences

Contact InformationBrainMasterBrainMasterBrainMasterBrainMaster Technologies, Inc.Technologies, Inc.Technologies, Inc.Technologies, Inc.: www.brainmaster.com

Thomas F. Collura: [email protected]

John, E. R., Prichep, L.S. & Eaton, P. (1987). Normative data banks andneurometrics: Basic concepts, methods and results of norm construction.In A. Remond (ed.), Handbook of electroencephalography and clinicalneurophysiology: Vol. III. Computer analysis of the EEG and otherneurophysiological signals (pp. 449-495). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Pascual-Marqui, R.D. (2002). Standardized low resolution brainelectromagnetic tomography sLORETA): technical details. Methods &Findings in Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology. 24D:5-12

Bonstetter, R., Collura, T. F., Bonstetter, B.J., & Hebets, D., (2012a). Trait andstate-based depression indicators measured using sLORETA imaging andquantification. Presented at the 2012 meetinf of the InternationalPharmaco-EEG Group (IPEG), New York, New York, November, 2012.

Bonstetter, R., Collura, T. F., Hebets, D., & Bonstetter, B.J. (2012b). Uncoveringthe belief behind the action. Neuroconnections, Winter 2012, 20-23

General Motors, Inc. (2013). 2014 Corvette Stingray Biometric Test Drive.Accessed from http://vimeo.com/channels/corvette.

Peper, E. & Hall, H. (2013) Sufi self-piercing with EEG monitoringdemonstration. Presented at the 2013 meeting of the Association forApplied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, March 15, Portland, Oregon.

LeftLeftLeftLeft: Focal deficitin Broca’s Area inan elderlyindividual with aspeech deficiency.

BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. & Brain Enrichment Center

Thomas F. Collura

Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback using a Normative Database

2. Isolation of Brain Functional 2. Isolation of Brain Functional 2. Isolation of Brain Functional 2. Isolation of Brain Functional RegionsRegionsRegionsRegions

1. Individual State Patterns1. Individual State Patterns1. Individual State Patterns1. Individual State Patterns

3. Complementary Activation 3. Complementary Activation 3. Complementary Activation 3. Complementary Activation ––––Sender & ReceiverSender & ReceiverSender & ReceiverSender & Receiver

4. 4. 4. 4. IpsativeIpsativeIpsativeIpsative Responses to CuesResponses to CuesResponses to CuesResponses to CuesMethodologyMethodologyMethodologyMethodology

The sLORETA algorithm was described by Pascual-

Marqui (2002), and the normative reference is based

on the database first described by John et al. (2000).

The examples that follow demonstrate its dynamic

functionality.

Above: A live reconstruction and imaging using sLORETA. Itdepicts training within the Cingulate Gyrus.

AboveAboveAboveAbove: Genardi’s Default Mode Network shown within 3-D reconstruction using a normative database.

Above: Z-scores reflecting the instantaneous current-sourcedensity compared to a normative population within Regions ofInterest (ROI) and Network Z-Scores.

AboveAboveAboveAbove: Dominant gamma wave activity in the left prefrontalcortex signifies acceptance & increased activity in the rightrepresents avoidance (Bonstetter, et al., 2012a; Bonstetter, etal., 2012b).

Using BrainAvatar™, the process examinesthe asymmetry in the prefrontal cortexidentifying gamma wave bursts to assess theunderlying subconscious decisions behindthese self-reported responses, at the verymoment of decision-making. This processprovides scientific evidence that an evokedemotionally laden response results incorresponding brain activity and exposesthe match to self reported explanations. Theprocess documents both the intensity ofhuman emotional response as well as thedirectionality of the response.

Specific results are shown demonstratingthe ability of this technique to isolate brainfunctional regions including networks andhubs, as a function of instantaneous brainstate.

In other cases of extreme performance,individual patterns reflecting states ofawareness, caution, and emotional tonewere recognized.

Another example, in a case of energyhealing, showed a unique pattern ofcomplementary activation between thesender and receiver.

In one case of extreme pain control, a hub

of awareness was detected at the -3.0 z-score level.

In this image of gamma activity, a profound

excess is found in the mesiotemporal regions,

corresponding to an internalized state

Page 2: Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback using a Normative ......BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. & Brain Enrichment Center Thomas F. Collura Live sLORETA Brain Imaging & Biofeedback

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

Methodology

Results

Target Training International, (TTI) in

cooperation with BrainMaster and their

BrainAvatar™ software, have for the first time,

turned the soft science of personal assessment into

a hard science by showing not just what people say

is their self reported ipsative response, but

validating their answers with corresponding brain

activity, using GIVE, (Gamma for Ipsative

Validation using Electroencephalography). The

GIVE process uses asymmetric gamma wave bursts

in the prefrontal cortex to validate the underlying

subconscious decisions behind these self reported

responses, at the very moment of decision-making.

This provides evidence that an evoked emotionally

laden response results in corresponding brain

activity that documents both the intensity and

direction of human emotional response.

Discussion

Using BrainAvatar™ the process examines

the asymmetry in the prefrontal cortex

identifying gamma wave bursts to assess the

underlying subconscious decisions behind

these self-reported responses, at the very

moment of decision-making. This process

provides scientific evidence that an evoked

emotionally laden response results in

corresponding brain activity and exposes the

match to self reported explanations. The

process documents both the intensity of human

emotional response as well as the directionality

of the response.

The first step involves a person completing an

online survey. Once that data has been

analyzed, the client is connected to the

BrainMaster BrainAvatar ™ and shown a

word or image from the previous online

assessment. These stimuli are on the

computer screen for 1 to 1.5 seconds,

followed by a 1.5 to 2 second blank screen.

Next the asymmetry between the right

and left frontal lobes are reviewed to

determine the individual’s reaction. Lastly,

the BrainAvatar™ results are compared to

The EEG area depicted in green represents one stimulus event.

Letter A represents the starting point of an event. Letter B

indicates the point in the EEG when an online stimulus ends.

Wellness Study Results: In the debriefing session,

this participant, diagnosed with severe depression,

revealed sleep deprivation, conflicts with healthy

food & her love of chocolate chip cookies, as well as disclosing that she was recently told she had 2 dark

spots on her lungs. She then opened up & began the process of reflecting upon the physical & mental implications.

Language Study Results:

Far more neuro-connections

occur in accordance with

one’s first language

regarding past experiences

& therefore show up as a

stronger response.

Additionally, as the

participant encountered the

word in languages other

than her native tongue, the

overall energy output of the

brain increased, in direct

agreement with her

proficiency.

This emerging technology using BrainAvatar™ and the

patent-pending VIDE process allows TTI to not only

validate and improve existing assessments, but to create

new approaches that expose the core beliefs behind our

behaviors, emotions, and daily decisions.


Recommended