+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ..:llAPTbR - VIII PART -A A SI!YiPLE...

..:llAPTbR - VIII PART -A A SI!YiPLE...

Date post: 26-Aug-2018
Category:
Upload: dinhtu
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
..:llAPTbR - VIII PART -A A SI!YiPLE SPECTROPHOTOME.TIUC DETERMINATION OF ENOOSULF AN IN Rl VER WATER AND SOIL SUMMARY A simple spectrophotometric determination of endosulfan (thiodan), a sulphur containing chlorinated pesticide is described. The method is based on the liberation of sulphur dioxide into an absorbing reagent, malonyldihydrazide and estimated by using p-aminoazo- benzene and formaldehyde in an acidic medium to give a pink coloured dye which has an absorbance maxima at 505 nm. Beer's law is obeyed in the range of 1-6 ppm for a standard solution of endosulfan. The method can easily applied in river water and soil samples to determine endosulfan level as low as 0.05 ppm and 0.25 ppm in river water and soil respectively. The method is free from the interference of most of the commonly used pesticides and other common ions.
Transcript

..:llAPTbR - VIII

PART -A

A SI!YiPLE SPECTROPHOTOME.TIUC DETERMINATION OF

ENOOSULF AN IN Rl VER WATER AND SOIL

SUMMARY

A simple spectrophotometric determination of

endosulfan (thiodan), a sulphur containing chlorinated

pesticide is described. The method is based on the

liberation of sulphur dioxide into an absorbing reagent,

malonyldihydrazide and estimated by using p-aminoazo­

benzene and formaldehyde in an acidic medium to give a

pink coloured dye which has an absorbance maxima at

505 nm. Beer's law is obeyed in the range of 1-6 ppm

for a standard solution of endosulfan. The method can

~e easily applied in river water and soil samples to

determine endosulfan level as low as 0.05 ppm and

0.25 ppm in river water and soil respectively. The

method is free from the interference of most of the

commonly used pesticides and other common ions.

,; il l'.i'l.!; ~WJ;;(,'TrtOt'III)TVMl:.T!U C Q£TERJ:IlNAT 101'1 Of

V.!«iMJ:'M IN IU M WATE,K MP 1!11.

1-)ldosultan ( thiodao), a broad specti'Ulll chlorinated

inltcticide as w~ll as ~ticide contains both sulphur and

oxyun as heterocyclic ato• and 1a 6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-

1,~,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-6,9,-•ethano-2,4,,-benzo­

dioxathiepin-,-oxide, also known as 5462. Endosul!an is

very effective against many different types o! insects

such as potato infesting insects, insects in!esting alfalfa,

:lover, cotton and shade tobacco, aphids on ornamentals,

and weevils on seed peas etc. It also shows a promising

control on spit bugs, white flies, tse-tse flies and

lea! hoppers and is approved to use on certain fruit and

vegetable crops (1-6). It acts as a synergistic insecti­

cide and acaricide (7,8). Endosulfan has controlled a

wide range of wood boring insects, hence it is used as a

demanding •.vood preservative (9). Consequently, the

residues of endosulfan are found in se.veral environmental

samples leading to the constant ingestion of residual

':iuant.i ties of the chemical, posing a hazardo>.t.s problem

for the heal til of man and animals ( 10-12).

It is highly toxic to animals, and is reported to

·:oe a suggestive carcinogenic compound ( 13, 14). Endo­

sulfan is metabolized, in plants and animals, to the

sulphate which is toxicologically similar to sul,.phi te( 15).

Syl!ptoms of poisoning by endosulfan are rather similar

to those caused by 'YBHC. Hyper excitability, tremor,

dypsnea and salivation are the common signs of endosulfan

toxicity (16,17). The acute oral LD50 in rats is

40-50 mg/kg and the median letllal concentrations Lc50 in

fishes is 5 ~g/1 for 24 hours and 0.6 ~g/1 for 48 hours

( 14, 15). Hesidues of endosulfan in soil was estimated to

be around 0.3!:l-4.60 ppm and in water about 1S7.0 - 3,400

ng/1 in various locations in u.s.A. (14).

The toxicity and persistent nature of endosulfan

in the environmental samples necessitated simple and

reliable ruethods for its determination in residues. Very

few analytical techniques such as gas chromatography (18),

gas liquid chromatography (19), thin layer chromato-

graphy (20), high performance liquid chromatography(21,22),

mass spectrophotometry (23) and visual spectrophoto-

metry (24,25) are available in literature for its determi­

nation. The commonly used spectrophotometric method

reported in literature (24) is based on the liberation of

sulphur dioxide from endosulfan using p-toluene sulphonic

acid. The liberated sulphur dioxide is subsequently

absorbed in glycerol-alkali solu+ion ;md estimated by

using p-rosaniline (PRA) and formaldehyde in an acidic

medium following West & Gaeke's method (26). But this

method has been criticized due to certain disadvantages

such as instability of sulphur dioxide in glycerol-alkali

solution (27), variable purity of the reagent PRA (28),

the !ormation o! unstable coloured complex (29), and lack

o! reproducibility and reliability. Hence, in the present

work, a simple spectrophotometric determination of endo­

sul!an is described to overcome the above detects. In

this method the liberated sulphur dioxide froa1 endosulfan

is absorbed in a simple absorbing reagent, malonyl­

dihydrazide and subsequently estimated by using p-amino­

azobenzene and formaldehyde in hydrochloric acid medium

to give a pink coloured dye, having absorbance maxima at

J05 nm. The proposed method has been successfully applied

for the determination of endosulfan in river water and

soil samples.

Apparatus:

A Carl Zeiss spekol with 1 em matched glass cells

was used for spectral measurements. Fritted midget

impingers of 35 ml capacity, a flow rate adjustable

calibrated rotameter and a vacuum pump were used for the

liberation and absorption of sulphur qioxide from

endosulfan.

Reagents:

Standard endosulfan solution (Tata Fision Ltd., India):

A 1% stock solution of endosulfan was prepared in ethanol.

A working standard of 20 pg/ml was prepared daily by

appropriate dilution of the stock.

3tar.dard sulphite solution: ~ulphite solution contain-

ing about 320 - 400 ~g of so2/ml was prepared by dissol­

ving 0,2 g of pre-dried sodium sulphite in 250 ml of

0.01 M malonyl dihydrazide in water. Sulphite solution

was standardized iodometrically. Working standards were

prepared by appropriate dilution of the stock in 0.01 M

malony ldihydrazide,

Acid reagent (24): An acid reagent was prepared by

dissolving 304 g of p-toluene sulphonic acid in 1 litre

of isopropanol plus 200 ml of demineralized water.

J>,alonyl dihydrazide (MI.lH) : The reagent was prepared as

earlier rE~ported method ( 30), described in Chapter II,

using diethyl malonate and hydrazine hydrate.

0.01 M solution of 1"1!lf, prepared in demineralized

water was used as absorbing reagent.

p-Aminoazobenzene (31): A 0,02% (w/v) solution of recrystallized p-aminoazobenzene was prepared in 25%

ethanol.

.2ormaldehyde: A 0.2% (v/v) solution of formaldehyde was . prepared by diluting 0. 5 ml of 40% f orrnal dehyde to 100 ml

with demineralized water.

2% Alcoholic potassium hydroxide and concentrated

hydrochloric acid were also made use of.

All reagents unless mentioned otherwise used were

of An alaR grade.

Procedurt>:

Preparation of calibration curve with endosulfan:

Liberation/adsorption of sulphur dioxide:

An aliquot of the standard solution containing

25 - 150 ~g of endosulfan was taken in an impinger. To

this 5 ml of acid reagent and 1 m1 of alcoholic pot.:.ssium

hydroxide were added. The impinger was then kept in a

water bath and connected serially to two impingers kept

outside the water bath containing 5 ml each of MDH solu­

tion. The third impinger was then connected to a source

of suction through a rotameter. Temperature of the water

beth was raised to r-J 90°C end the air was drawn through

the impingers at a rate of 0.75 lit/min for 15 minutes.

Analysis:

The absorbed solution was transferred into a

25 ml volumetric flask. To it 1 ml of p-aminoazobenzene

was added and acidity was maintained between 0.02 - 0.16 M

hydrochloric acid. Then 1 ml of formaldehyde and 1 ml of

concentrated hydrochloric acid were added, The volume was

made upto the mark with demineralized water. After

15 minutes, the absorbance of the pink coloured dye was

measured at 505 nm against demineralized water. The

actual absorbance of sample solution was calculated by

substracting the absorbance value of the blank from the

value of the sample.

Preparation of standard extinction curve1

An aliquot of standard sodium sulphite solution

in 0.01 M MUi containing 4-24 }Jg of sulphur dioxide was

taken in 25 m1 volumetric flask and colour was developed

as described above. The amount of sulphur dioxide was

multiplied by 6.35 to convert to endosulfan equivalent(24).

The resulting values were then plotted against the proper

absorbance values to obtain a standard curve (Fig. 5).

Determination of recovery in water and soil samples:

Water samples (500 ml) or 100 g of soil sample of

finely ground soil samples were spiked with known amount

of endosulfan and extracted with 2 x 100 ml portions of

petroleum ether (60-80°C) in a glass bottle. The extract

was decanted and combined in a separatory funnel and

washed with 2 x 200 ml portions of demineralized water,

discarding the water layer. Extract was dried over

anhydrous sodium sulphate in a filter funnel and collected

into a 250 ml calibrated flask. The filter funnel was

washed with 20 ml of petroleum ether and the volume was

made upto the mark. Sui table aliquot of washed extract

containing 25 - 150 }Jg of endosulfan was evaporated off

under reduced pressure using moderate suction. The residue

was mixed with 5 ml of iso-propanol and the sulphur dioxide

was liberated/absorbed for the subsequent colour develop­

ment as described in the procedure for the preparation of

calibration curve with endosulfan. Recoveries from samples

were found to be~ 99% (Table I).

TAIJLE - I

RE<X>VERY OF ENJXJSULFAN FROM SPIKE!J

RI Vffi WATffi MlD SOIL SAMPLES

-----------------------------------------------------------Sample Amount of

endosulfan added *

(p.g)

Amount found by proposed method *

(p.g)

% liecovery

Amount found by reported method *

(,ug)

% Recovery

-----------------------------------------------------------

** Soil

*** Water

25

50

75

100

25

50

75

100

24,62

48.65

?3.65

98.60

24.57

49.00

73.65

99.10

98.5

97.3

98.2

98.6

98.3

98.0

98.2

99.1

24.55

48.55

73.50

98.50

24.57

49.00

73.57

98.80

98.2

97.1

98.0

98.5

98.3

98.0

98.1

98,8

-----------------------------------------------------------* **

Mean of three replicate analyses

Amount of sample = 100 g

Amount of sample "' 500 ml

~ESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Spectral characteristics:

The pink coloured dye has a maximum absorbance

at 50~ nm. The reagent blank has also same wave length

of absorption (Fig. 1). The actual absorbance of sample

was therefore calculated by substracting the value of

reagent bl.ank from the value of the sample (31).

Absorption efficiency:

The important analytical parameters such as

absorption efficiency of the proposed absorbing reagent

(MDH), effect of various concentration of absorbing solu­

tion, flow rate and temperature on absorption efficiency

and stability of liberated sulphur dioxide from endosulfan

in absorbing medium were studied by liberating sulphur

dioxide from standard sodium sulphite solution following

the reported methods (31).

Two midget impingers containing 10 ml of 0.01 M

MDH in each were connected in series and rJ 38.2 litres of

air containing various amounts of sulphur dioxide was

passed at different flow rates ranging from 0.05-2,0

lit/min. through the impingers. (If the sample size is

38.2 litres, then each microgram of sulphur dioxide

obtained is equivalent to 0.01 ppm of sulphur dioxide in

air (26,31)). After sampling sulphur dioxide was analysed

by tne proposed procedure. Almost 100~ absorption effi­

ciency was obtained in the first impinger, while the

0·8......--------------------.

0·7

8 0·6

0·5

0·4

0·3 A

0·2

0 ·1

QL---~ ____ _L ____ J_ ____ L_ __ ~----~----~--~

450 470 490 510 5 30

WAVElENGTH, nm

FIG.1.ABSOR BANCE SPECTRA OF THE DYE

A. REAGENT BLANK.

550 570

8. CONCENTRATION OF ENOOSULFAN= 125).lg/25ml.

5 971

second impinger gave negative test !or sulphur dioxide.

E.!!ect of various concentrations of MI:il solution on absor­

ption efficiency was studied • 0.005 - 0,1 M MDH solution

were found to have ,..... 100% absorption efficiency (Table II) •

Flow rate variation from 0.25 - 2.0 lit/min and temper­

ature variation from 15° - 4o°C had no effect on the

absorption efficiency (Table III).

Stability of collected sulphur dioxide samples:

Stability of collected sulphur dioxide in 0.01 M

MDH solution as well as 0.05 M sodium hydroxide solution

containing 2% glycerol were studied by preparing standard

sodium sulphite solution in 0.01 N MDH solution and 0.05 1'11

sodium hydroxide solution containing 2% glycerol respect­

ively. The ali~ots of above solution were analysed for

30 days by proposed procedure. It was observed that

sulphite solution was stable forr-> 30 days in 0.01 M MDH

without any deterioration when kept in refrigerator,

whereas sulphite solution in 0.05 M sodium hydroxide

containing 2% glycerol was found to be very unstable at

room temperature (Fig, 2),

Effect of variables on colour development:

Acidity:

Acidity of the colour reaction was maintained in

two steps. It was found that the maximum colour intensity

was obtained when the acidity was adjusted to o.o2-o.16 M

with hydrochloric acid after the addition of p-aminoazo­

benzene in the first step (Fig. 3) ar:d then 0.2-1.5 N

flow rate

TJJ.JLE - II

El''r'ECT OF COt.CE.N'l'RATION OF Kill ON

AdSORPTION EFFICIENCY

Volume of air sampled in each case •

0. 75 lit/min

38.2 11 tres.

-----------------------------------------------------------S.No. Concen­

tration MDH

so2 passed of

(}lg)

so2 found in * first impinger

(}.lg)

Absorption %

------------------------------------------------------------1. 0.005

2. 0.01

3. 0.02

4. 0.08

5. 0.1

4.0 8.0 12 .o 24.0

4.0 8.0

12.0 24.0

4.0 8.0

12.0 24.0

4.0 s.o

12.0 24.0

4.0 8.0

12.0 24.0

3.97 + 0.012 7.96 + 0.180

11.98..! 0.05 23.99 + o.oe

3. 94 .:!: 0 • 0 3 7.99 + 0.07

11. 99 ..! 0. 04 23.94 + 0.06

3. 99 .:!: 0.04 7.9<) + 0.04

11.94 + 0.03 23.98 + 0.06

3.96.:!: 0.01 7.98.:!: 0.015

11.97.:!: 0.054 23.80 + 0.020

3.95.:!: 0.015 7.87 + 0.031

11.89 + 0.06 23.96 + 0.07

99.26 99.60 99.84 99.97

98.70 99.90 99.98 99.76

99.80 99.94 99.50 99.92

99.20 99.84 99.76 99.20

98.80 98.40 99.10 99.84

------------------------------------------------------------* Mean of three repetitive analyses. In each case sulphur dioxide found in 2nd impinger was negligible.

TABLE - III

FJ.o'n;CT OF TEI>iPEHATUHE ON AoSOHPTlON

EFr'ICIENCY

Ancentration of MOO - 0.01 M

Flow rate -1olume of air sampled in each case •

0. 75 11 t/min.

38.2 11 tres

--------------------------------------------------------S.No. Temper­

ature oc

so2 passed so2 found in

first * impinger

().I g)

Absorption %

--------------------------------------------------------1. 15 10 9.96 + 0.021 99.60

20 19.99..! 0.028 99.96

30 29.97.! 0.049 99.90

2. 25 10 9.99 + 0.031 99.90

20 19.99 .± 0.054 99.95

30 29.99 + 0.019 99.99

3. 40 10 9.95 + Q.050 99.50

20 19.98 + 0.015 99.90

30 29.88 + 0.030 99.60

--------------------------------------------------------*Mean of four repi ti ti ve analyses.

0.7......----------------------,

0.6r--

O.Sf-

E (j, 0.41-0 ..,., ~

w u ~ 0.3r-CD 0:: 0 C/l CD < 0.2f-

0. 11-

,...._ -..... --· -..... --......... _

-...... --,.._ ----- -

OL----~·----~L----~'----L-'--~'-----L-'--~'~--~ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

NUMBER OF DAYS,S02 ANALYSED

FIG.2. STABILITY CURVE FOR S02 DIS SOLVED

0 0 IN MALONYL DIHYDRAZIDE (MDH)

------e IN GLYCEROL ALKALI

CONCENTRATION OF S02 LIBERA TED FROM

100J..tg ENDOSULFAN =l5.75J..tg/25ml.

40

wlth hydrochlorlc acid after the addition of formaldehyde

solution in the second step (Fig. 4).

Ti•e:

It was noted that 20 minutes were needed for full

colour development and the pink coloured dye was stable

for ,.J 12 hours at 20 - 30°C,

Beer's law, Molar absorptivity and Sandell's sensitivity:

Beer's law is obeyed in the range of 25-150 pg

( 1 - 6 ppm) per 25 ml of standard endosulfan solution

(Fig. 5).

vity were

The molar absorptivity

found to be 4.8x104 lit

6 -2 0.008 pg em respectively.

Reoroduci bili ty of the method:

and Sandell's sensiti-

-1 -1 ( ) mol em .:!: 100 and

The reproducibility of the method was checked by

replicate analysis of a standard solution containing

100 pg per 25 ml (4 ppm) of endosulfan over a period of

7 days, The standard deviation and relative standard

deviation were found to be .:!: 0.0071 and .:!: 1. 5% respect­

ively (Table IV).

Effect of foreign species:

Effect of foreign species commonly present with

endosulfan was studied to check the applicability of the

method. Other organochlorine pesticide, organophosphorus

pesticides, carbamates, organomercurials, ammonia, phenol,

nitrate and phosphate do not interfere with the reaction.

o.er---------------------1 0.7

~

w u o., z <t IJ) 0. 3 a:: 0

:£ 0.2 <t

0.1

0.02 o.o, 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.1, 0.16 0.18 0.20

CONCENTRATION OF HYDROCHLORIC ACID, M

FIG.3. EFFECT OF ACIDITY ON COLOUR REACTION (AFTER THE

ADDITION OF P-AMINO AZO BENZENE ) -

CONCENTRATION OF ENDOSULFAN: 100}.lg/25mL

0.7'r-------------------------------------------.

E 0.6 c:: ~ 0.5 Lll .., w 0.4 u z ~ 0.3 a:: ~ 0.2 m <t 0.1

OL-~L---~--~--~---L---L--~--~--~L_----~ 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7

CONCENTRATION OF HYDROCHLORIC ACID,M

FIG.t.. EFFECT OF ACrDITY ON COLOUR DEVELOPMENT (AFTER

THE ADDITION OF FORMALDEHYDE)

CONCENTRATION OF ENDOSULFAN: 100)..lg/25mL

: 0.&.--------------------------r

f 0.7

0.6

0.5

: . ' ) 0.4 , ~ )

' i· D 3 ~ . : ) l l ( 0.2

h

25

/, /,

I.

/ /

30

/

~ ;·

/ /

75

I I

/ t

I I

I

100

/

~ / .

125

I

/.A I

150

CONCENTRATION OF ENDOSULFAN IN ~g /25m!.

17 5

FIG.S.CALIBRATION DATA FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ENDOSULFAN.

A.~ CALIBRATION CURVE FOR ENDOSULFAN THROUGH

LIBERATION APPARATUS.

8. ·•----•·CALIBRATION CURVE FOR ENDOSULFAN AS

SOz x6.35 NOT LIBERATED THROUGH APPARATUS.

TABLE _ IV

REPRODUCIBILITY Or' THE METHOD

Concentration of endosulfan - 100 pg/25 ml (4 ppm)

--------------------------------------------------------No. of days Absorbance,

505 nm --------------------------------------------------------

1 0.475

2 0.478

3 0.480

4 0.475

5 0.460

6 0.478

7 0.481

Mean "' 0.475

Standard deviation = + 0.0071

Relative standard deviation = .!: 1.5 %

--------------------------------------------------------

Aramite and other sulphur containing compounds, which

easily liberate sulphur dioxide interfere with ttJe react­

ion. Nitrogen dioxide does not interfere upto 8 ppm.

Reaction mechanism:

The sulphur dioxide (I) liberated from endosulfan

is absorbed in MDH to form hydrazino sulphinic acid (II)

similar to one obtained by the reaction between phenyl

bydrazine and sulphur dioxide (32,33).

Cl ( 1) H

H

Cl

Endosulfan

Phenyl hydrazine

H

---CH2 - 0

~ H CH2 - 0

"' I s~o

Hydrazino sulphinic acid

(II)

The sulphur dioxide absorbed in MDH is released

quantitatively by the addition of 0.1 J'll hydrochloric

acid, The released sulphur dioxide combines in situ with

p-aminoazobenzene (containing only one amino group) in

presence of formaldehyde to give pink coloured dye having

aminomethane sulphonic acid structure (III).

(111) @- N-N-@- Nli2 + SOz + HCHO

p-aminoazo benzene l @- N • N - @ -NHCH2so 3H

(III)

CONCLUSION

Malonyl dihydrazide (MDH) as an absorbing medium

in combination with p-aminoazobenzene and formaldehyde

provides a simple, selective and reproducible spectre-

photometric method for the determination of endosulfan.

The pink coloured dye is stable for,....., 12 hours and has

the reproducibility. Method is free from the inter-

ference of most commonly associated foreign species,

hence can be applied for the determination of endosulfan

in environmental samples.

CliAP'fER - VI li

PAR'f - B

A NO VEL TEST FOR THE DETECTION AND SEMiqUANTITATl VE

DETERMINATION OF ENOOSULFAN IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES

SUfo'.MARY

A fast and simple method for the detection and

semi quanti tat! ve determination of endosulfan ( thiodan)

is described. The method is based on the liberation of

sulphur dioxide from endosulfan and its subsequent esti­

mation using zinc acetate, sodium nitroprusside and

malonyldihydrazide (MDH) to form a brick red coloured

sulphi to nitroprusside ion [ ~'e (CN) 5

Noso3

] 4-. The

intensity of the red colour is enhanced by the use of

zinc ion and malonyldihydrazide. This reaction has been

successfully applied to detect and semiquantitatively

determine the endosulfan as low as 0. 3 ppm in soil and

0.1 ppm in water.

A NOVl::L TEST r'UR THE DE'n.:CTlOt. AND SOOQUAATITATI VE

LlETEi\Mlt.ATION Or' Ei'IOOSULF AJ'; lN El' Vl RONMl:l'lTAL SAl'!PLES

Endosul!an, a sul~hur containing chlorinated

pesticide is well known !or its toxicity. Its common

and frequent usage has rendered it ubi qui to us in the

environment. In view of its toxic effects on health,

vegetation and property, a fast, simple and reliable

method for the detection of traces of endosulfan would

be of imn,ense value. Various methods have been suggested

for its detection and determination in trace amounts.

Toxicity and methods of determination of endosulfan has

already beE'Il discussed in Part 'A 1 • Few methods for

the detection of E'Ildosulfan are cited in the litera-

ture (34-38),

In the present investigation a fast and simple

method for the detection and semiquantitative determina­

tion of endosulfan based on the liberation of sulphur

dioxide from endosulfan is described. The subsequent

estimation of liberated sulphur dioxide is based on

Bodeker' s reaction for sulphite ion with sodium nitro­

prusside (39,4o) in which a red colouration develops due

to the formation of sulphito nitroprusside ion

[Fe (CN) 5 NOS0 3 ]4

- (41). The intensity of the coloured

product in Bodeker reaction was found to increase by the

addition of metals such as zinc, cadmium, iron, nickel,

copper and organic bases like hexamine, pyridine, 2-amino

pyridine, quinoline and thiourea (41-43). Later, this

reaction was used in the preparation of test papers for

detection of sulphur dioxide (44). Bourbon et al (45)

have used pyridine with theae reagents to tnhance the • colour reaction. o<:, oe bipyridyl, 1: 10 phenanthroline

and rv.re have been reported for the detection of sulphur

dioxide by Gupta et al (46-48) using similar method,

This reaction has now been successfully applied to

detect and semiquantitatively determine the endosulfan

as low as 0.3 ppm in soil and 0,1 ppm in water.

EXPEiUiv.ENTAL

Standard endosulfan solution (Tata !:"ison Ltd., India):

A standard solution containing 10 ~g/ml of endosulfan

was prepared in ethanol.

Acid reagent: Acid reagent was prepared as described

in Part A.

Malonyldihydrazide (l-1DH): Mil-l was prepared by the

reported method (30).

Test reagents:

1, Zinc acetate: 1 M zinc acetate solution was

prepared in 5% v/v glycerol.

2. Sodiuu; nitroprusside: 2;lt w/v solution of sodium

nitroprusside was prepared in demineralized water,

3. fvlDH solution: 2% w/v solution of MDi-! was

prepared in demineralized water.

All reagents unless mentioned otherwise used

were of AnalaR grade.

Preparation of test solution:

Test solution was pre~ared fresh daily by mixing

equal volumes of each of the above mpntioned test reagents,

zinc acetate, sodium nitroprusside and MDH. A cream

coloured colloidal solution was formed.

Preparation of test papers:

Whatman No. 1 filter paper strips (1x5 ems) were

dipped in each of the reagents zinc acetate, sodium nitro­

prusside and l'•lli serially. These papers were dried after 0

each dip in a temperature controlled oven at 50 - 60 C.

These papers were cream coloured and stable for few weeks

when kept in well stoppered dark brown bottles.

Procedure:.

50 g of finely ground soil or 100 ml water sample

was spiked with known amounts of endosulfan and extracted

twice with 2x50 ml petroleum ether (60-80°C) in a glass

bottle. The extract was decanted and combined in a sepa-

ratory funnel and washed with two portions of 200 ml of

water in a separatory funnel, discarding the water layer.

Extract was then dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate.

Suitable aliquot of the washed extract containing 10 pg

or above endosulfan was evaporated off in an impinger or

test tube and was tested for endosulfan in two ways: by

using test solution or using test papers.

Using test solution:

Tbe endosulfan residue taken in an impinger, was

dissolved in 10 ml of ethanol. To it 1 ml of 2~ alcoholic

potassium hydroxide and 2 m1 of acid reagent were added.

The impinger was then kept on a water bath and connected

to a second impinger containing test solution kept out

side the water bath. The second impinger was then

connected to a source of suction. Temperature of the

water bath was raised to,......, 90° C and the air was drawn

through the second impinger. The colour of colloidal

test solution turned from cream to brick red due to

evolved sulphur dioxide indicatin&the presence of endo­

sulfan in the residue.

Using test paper:

The endosulfan residue taken in a test tube was

dissolved in 10 ml of ethanol. To it 1 ml of alcoholic

potassium hydroxide and 2 ml of acid reagent were added.

The test tube was then kept on a water bath (,...., 90°C).

The test paper when kept on the mouth of the test tube .

turned from cream to brick red immediately, which indi-

cated the presence of endosulfan in the residue.

For semiquantitative determination J the colour

produced in the test solution or test paper was compared

with that of obtained from the standard solution contain­

ing 10 - 60 pg of endosulfan following the same procedure.

.....

ttESULTS AND DlSCUSS!Ot.

The brick red colloidal :;elution was stable

for more than 24 hours. The pH of the colloidal solu­

tion after colour formation was found to be between 5.5

and 5.8. Increase in intensity of the colour by addition

of MDH was supposed to be due to the formation of

[ Zn (MDH) x) 2 Fe (CN) 5 No.so3 J (48). Brick red preci­

pitate was not soluble in organic solvents like chloro­

form, carbontetrachloride, benzene, butanol, methyl

acetate, etc. The coloured colloidal solution was either

decomposed or remained undissolved in these solvents.

Semiquantitative detern1ination of endosulfan in

soil or water is possible by comparing the colour of

test solution produced by different known amounts of

endosulfan with that produced by the unknown following

the above procedure.

Other organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus

pesticides, carbamates, chloride, ammonia, nitrate and

phosphate do not interfere with this reaction. Aramite . and other sulphur containing aromatic compounds which

easily liberate sulphur dioxide, interfere with this

reaction.

OON eLUSION

The proposed method is fast, simple and reason­

ably sensitive for the determination and semiquantitative

determination of endosulfan. The method is also found

to be free of co-pollutants and can be successfully

applied for the detection or semiquantitative determi­

nation of endosulfan in environmental samples.

1.

2.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

REFE~CES

w. Andrzej, w. Kazimiez and c. Wajciech, Rocz. Nauk Roln. Ser. E., j1(1), (1988), 97; C.A., ..11Q(1), (1989)·, 2873a.

R.A. Verma, P.M. Nigam and J.R. Uttam, Oryza, ~(1), (1986), 42; C.A., .lQZ{3), (1987), 19479n.

T. Visvanathan and A. Abdul Kareem, Pesticides, .11(7), (1983), 33.

A. Konrad, H. Horst, R. Hans and J .N. Alsop, Ger. Offen, ( 1987), 3; C.A., .1.Q.§(5), ( 1988), 33634m.

N.G. Patil, G.N. Salunkhe and D.S. Ajri, Curr. Res. Rep., j(2), ( 1985), 203; C.A., ..1Q.2(21), ( 1985), 173996c.

O.J. Agunloye, J. Hortic Sci., 62(2), (1987), 269.

J.M. Barre, Braz. Pedido PI BR 86 02, 933, (1986), 12; C.A., ~(1), (1988), 2493!. -

J.N. Briden and c. Francois, Fr. Demande FR, 626 (1985) 13; C.A., .1Q.2(15), (1985), 11828v.

K. Helmut and P.H. Jaochim, Mater Org., 18(2), ( 1983), 81; c.A., 1QQ( 17), ( 1987), 13424'5ii.

S.H. Patel, C.B. Patel and A.H. Shah, Gujrat Agric. Univ. Res. J., 9{2), (1984), 19;

K. Rajukkannu, A, Regupathy and T. Kumaraswami, Pestle. Environ. Proc. Natl. Semin., (1983), 43; C.A., .1Ql (23), (1985), 195085g.

P. Lalitha, P. Krishnamoorthy, K.K. Kumar and V.G. Prasad, Pesticides, 18(14), (1984), 19.

N .I. Sax, "Cancer Causing Chemicals", Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, (1981), p. 399,

15.

16.

17.

C.A. Edward, •Environmental Pollution by Pesti­cides", Plenum Press, London, (1973), P· 417.

H. Martin, "Pesticide Manual", British Crop Protection Council, (1968), p. 199.

T.s.s. Dikshith, R.B. Raizada and M.K. Srivastava, Ind. Health, ~(4), (1984), 295.

T.s.s. Dikshith, R.B. Raizada, S.N. Kumar and M.K. Srivastava, V'et. Hum. Toxicol., 2Q(3), (1988), 219.

18. P.E.F. Zaun, T.J. Spieranburg and A.J. Baars, J. Chroma to gr., _ill ( 1), ( 1987), 1J3.

19. VI. Dejonckheere, W. Steurbaut and R.H. Kips, Meded Fac. Landbouwet. Rijksuniv. Gent., ~ (4), (1980), 929; Anal. Abstr., 42, (1982) 1F 45.

20. H.J. Petrowitz and s. Wagner, Fresenius z. Anal. Chern., 2Q.2 (3), ( 1981), 196.

21. J, Demeter and A. Heyndrickx, J, Anal. Toxicol., _g (2)' ( 1978), 68.

22, J. Demeter and A. HeyndrickX, Vet. Hum. Toxicol., 21, (1979), 151.

23. W.D. Lehman, H.R. Schulten and H.M. Schiebel, Fresenius' z. Anal. Chem., 289 ( 1), ( 1978), 11.

24. G. Zweig, "Pesticides Plant Growth Regulators and Food Additives", Academic Press, New York, (1964), p. 511.

25. S.B. Halagur, V. Krishnamoorthy and S.K. Najumder, Pestic. Sci., .12 (6), (1984), 571.

26, P.W. West and G.c. Gaeke, Anal. Chem., 38, ( 1956)' 1816.

27. s. Atkin, Anal. Chem., ~. (1950), 947.

28. G.c. Herold King and G. Pruden, Analyst, 94, (1969), 42.

29.

5<),

31.

32.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

40.

II.F. Welch and J.P. Terry, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 3.,1. ( 1960). 316.

J... Choube and V.K. Gupta, Analyst, jQ§, (1983), 1141.

s. Sunita and V.K. Gupta, Analyst,~. (1988), 825.

J.K. Diwan and K. Satyanarayan, J. Less Common Metals, .2,2, ( 1977), 165.

H. v. Nauman, P.W. Westl F. Tron and G.c. Gaeke, Anal. Chem., .B• (1960) 1 13()7.

x.M. Dreher and B. Podratzki, Agric. Food Chem., 36(5), (1988}, 1072.

V.B. Patil, M.T. Sevaikar and S,V. Padalikar, J. Chromatogr., 396, (1987), 441.

R. Prakash and R.S. Verma, Indian Drugs, _gg (12), (1985), 659.

N.G.K. Karanth, H.s. Srimathi and S.K. l"iajumdar, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 28(2), (1982), 221.

A, Coutsclinis, P Kentarchou and D. Boukis, Forensic Sci.,.§ {3), (1976), 251.

c. Bodeker, Ann., 117, (1861), 183.

A.G. Fogg and R.A. Chalmers, Ana~. ~nim. Acta, 36 • ( 1966} t 248 •

41. F. Feigl, v. Anger and R. Oesper, "Spot Test in Inorganic Analysis", Elsevier Publication, New York, (1972), p. 436-446.

42. T. Pavolini, Bull. Chim-Pharm., £2, (1930), 713,

43, J.s. Johar, J.P. Singh and G. Majumdar, Curr. Sci., 40, (1971), 547.

44. N. Sciacca and E. Solarima, Ann. ~bim. Applicata., .JQ, ( 1940), 246; c.A., .J.2, ( 1941), 1353.

45. P. dourbon and R. Malboce, Pollut. Atmos., ..u. ( 1971)' 52.

46. J. l~air and V.K. Gupta, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 54, (1977), 841.

47. J. Nair and V.K. Gupta, Intern. J. J:.nviron. Studies, .lQ, ( 1977), 302.

48. A. Ghoube and V.K. Gupta, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 59, (1982), 1106.


Recommended