+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Local Shielding around the PS Straight Section75 ?

Local Shielding around the PS Straight Section75 ?

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: colton
View: 64 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Local Shielding around the PS Straight Section75 ? . Sanja Damjanovic, DGS-RP . LIU-PS Meeting, CERN, June 11, 2013 . FLUKA Geometry of the Local Shielding around Dummy Septum 15. PS Ejection Region with dummy septum 15 . SS16. SS15. b eam direction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
25
S. Damjanovic, CERN 1 Local Shielding around the PS Straight Section75 ? Sanja Damjanovic, DGS-RP LIU-PS Meeting, CERN, June 11, 2013
Transcript
Page 1: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 1

Local Shielding around the PS Straight Section75 ?

Sanja Damjanovic, DGS-RP

LIU-PS Meeting, CERN, June 11, 2013

Page 2: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 2

FLUKA Geometry of the Local Shielding around Dummy Septum 15

beam direction

SS15

SS16

Soil, Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Concrete, Air, Steel l

Local shielding in SS15

PS Ejection Region with dummy septum 15

MMU14 MMU15

Page 3: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 3

Details of the Local Shielding around the Dummy Septum

- longitudinal dimension: 100 cm

- lateral dimension: 200 cm

- vertical dimension: 220 cm

Proposal: implement similar shielding around SS75 in order to - reduce the exposure of electronics in the RF alcove next to SS77 - reduce the prompt dose rate at the emergency exit towards EA

Page 4: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 4

FLUKA Geometry of a possible Local Shielding around SS75

Soil, Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Concrete, Steel

beam direction

SS75

PS Sector 8

SS76

local shielding

around SS75

RF Alcove

local shielding in SS75

MMU74

MMU75

MMU74

Page 5: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 5

FLUKA Geometry of the PS Sector 8 including the RF Alcove

Soil, Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Concrete, Steel, Iron l

RF alcove

BE/RF1

BE/RF2

existing concrete shielding block in front of the RF alcove: 160 cm long and 80 cm wide;BE/RF crates locally shielded by iron blocks

SS77 - RF cavity 40MHzSS76 - RF cavity

10MHzSS75-local shielding

Page 6: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

6

- for MTE operation, about 13% of the total beam loss (2%) between SS75 and SS80 (with 11% of 13% in SS75)

Assumptions for the Simulation

- For the simulation in the PS Sector 8 use the (normalized) beam loss distribution along sections SS75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 80 measured by the BLMs as an input to the FLUKA simulations

- absolute normalization: multiply the FLUKA results extracted per primary with the measured beam loss rate of 2.5×1010 p/s (0.25% of the primary 1013 p/s)

for the annual estimate assume 2550 effective hours per year

- proton beam momentum of p=14 GeV - MTE operation at full beam intensity of 1013 p/s; total beam losses 2% - beam losses distributed according to the BLM measurements

6S. Damjanovic, CERN

83% of total loss in Sector 8 measured by BLM in SS75

Page 7: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

Continuous Transfer (CT) ejection – beam losses

CT lossesMTE losses

For CT operation highest beam losses in the region of SS31 (electrostatic septum) Large losses also in SS16 and SS75

PS Report CERN-ATS-2011-007 (2011)

Similar distribution of losses between SS75-80 with higher absolute values for the CT

Conclusions to be drawn later for MTE operation would also be valid for CT

SS75

Page 8: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

Can the local shielding around SS75 efficiently reduce the exposure of the electronics inside the RF technical alcove next to SS77 ?

Physical Dose -long term ionizing damage-

1MeV-Eq Neutron Fluence -Displacement Damage-

High Energy (Ek>20 MeV) Hadron Fluence - Single Event Error -

to answer the question these quantities should be followed

Page 9: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 9

Dose [Gy/y] distribution w/o and with local shielding in SS75 2-dim projections of Dose in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

Comparing the color codes, dose inside the RF alcove the same with and w/o local shielding around SS75

Dose [G

y/year]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

z-beam direction, x-vertical, y-horizontal direction

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p in the region between SS75 and SS80

SS

75

local shielding can hardly reduce downstream radiation (like for SS15)

Page 10: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 10

Detailed comparison of Dose distribution inside the RF Alcove

2-dim projections of Dose in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

SS75 w/o local shielding SS75 locally shielded

Dose [G

y/year]

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

BE/RF2

BE/RF1

options RF1 - Dose [Gy/year] RF2 - Dose [Gy/year]

Option I – w/o Local Shielding around SS75 2.7±0.2 5.4±0.3

Option II – with Local Shielding around SS75 2.9±0.2 5.0±0.3

Option III – without present block in front of alcove 4.0±0.3 7.7±0.3

Hardly any reduction of the dose in the two BE/RF crates with the additional local shielding around SS75

Present shielding block reduces the dose inside the BE/RF1 and RF2 only by factors of 1.3 and 1.5, resp.

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p in the region between SS75 and SS80

Page 11: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 11

Dose distribution – solely contribution from the losses inside SS75

for a nominal MTE operation year with 0.8×2.3×10+17 lost p in the SS75

options RF1 - Dose [Gy/year] RF2 - Dose [Gy/year]

all sources contribution from source in SS75 all sources contribution from

source in SS75

w/o Local Shielding around SS75 2.7 1.1 5.4 2.5

with Local Shielding around SS75 2.9 1.2 5.0 2.0

Lack of any shielding effect also visible in the isolated contribution from SS75

Page 12: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 12

Distribution of high energy (Ek>20 MeV) hadron fluence w/o and with local shielding in SS75

2-dim projections in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

As for the dose, no effect of the shielding in the RF alcove

Distance along y-axis (cm)

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p distributed between SS75 and SS80

h [1/cm2/year]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

Page 13: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 13

Detailed comparison of HE hadron fluence inside the RF Alcove

2-dim projectionsin y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

SS75 w/o local shielding SS75 locally shielded

h [1/cm2/year]

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

BE/RF2

BE/RF1

options RF1 - h [1/cm2/year] RF2 - h [1/cm2/year]

Option I – w/o Local Shielding around SS75 8.3×109 1.3×1010

Option II – with Local Shielding around SS75 8.3×109 1.3×1010

Option III – without present block in front of alcove 9.3×109 2.1×1010

No reduction of the hadron fluence in the two BE/RF crates with the additional local shielding around SS75

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p in the region between SS75 and SS80

Present shielding block reduces the h-fluence inside the BE/RF1 and RF2 only by factors of 1.1 and 1.6, resp.

Page 14: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 14

Distribution of 1MeV-eq neutron fluence w/o and with local shielding in SS75

2-dim projections in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p distributed between SS75 and SS80

1MeV-eq n [1/cm

2/year]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

Again no effect of the shielding in the RF alcove

Page 15: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 15

Detailed comparison of 1MeV-eq neutron fluence in the RF Alcove

2-dim projectionsin y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

SS75 w/o local shielding SS75 locally shielded 1MeV-eq n [1/cm

2/year]

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

BE/RF2

BE/RF1

options RF1 – 1MeV-eq neutron [1/cm2/year]

RF2 – 1MeV-eq neutron [1/cm2/year]

Option I – w/o Local Shielding around SS75 9.7×1010 1.2×1011

Option II – with Local Shielding around SS75 9.5×1010 1.2×1011

Option III – without present block in front of alcove 1.2×1011 1.9×1011

No reduction of the 1MeV-eq neutron fluence in the two RF crates with the additional local shielding around SS75

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p in the region between SS75 and SS80

Present shielding block reduces the 1MeV-eq-n-fluence inside the BE/RF1 and RF2 only by factors of 1.3 and 1.5, resp.

Page 16: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

Fluence Spectra scored in the volume of the two BE/RF crates

Local shielding of two BE/RF crates by the Fe walls most effective way to reduce the exposure of the electronics (up to a factor of 10; see my slides shown at 10th MCWG meeting 04/2012)

Small effects of the present concrete block: reduction by factors 1.2 and 1.6 for the BE/RF1 and RF2 ,resp (see remarks below).

Local shielding around SS75 cannot reduce the exposure of the electronics inside the RF technical alcove

Page 17: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

Can the local shielding around SS75 efficiently reduce the prompt dose rate at the emergency exit towards the EA location (exit door D113)?

Page 18: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 18

Stray radiation w/o and with local shielding in SS75 2-dim projections of Dose Rate in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

Dose R

ate [mS

v/h]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

z-beam direction, x-vertical, y-horizontal direction

for beam loss rate 2.54×10+10 p/s between SS75 and SS80

MM

U75Chicane

How much is the stray radiation reduced at the entrance to the Chicane ?

Page 19: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 19

Stray radiation w/o and with local shielding in SS75 2-dim projections of Dose Rate in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

Dose R

ate [mS

v/h]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

z-beam direction, x-vertical, y-horizontal direction

for beam loss rate 2.54×10+10 p/s between SS75 and SS80

MM

U75Chicane

How much is the stray radiation reduced at the entrance to the Chicane ?

Page 20: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 20

Dose Rates along the tunnel wall – side towards the EA

Prompt radiation at the entrance to the chicane reduced by only ~20%

1 dim projections along z (beam direction) averaged over Δy=40 cm from the tunnel wall

(already downstream enough to not get any benefit) is

Page 21: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

Addendum Remarks on the present concrete shielding block

S. Damjanovic, CERN 21

Page 22: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 22

Dose [Gy/y] distribution w and w/o concrete block 2-dim projections of Dose in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

Comparing the color codes, the dose inside the RF alcove similar with and w/o concrete block – size and position of the block ineffective

Dose [G

y/year]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

z-beam direction, x-vertical, y-horizontal direction

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p in the region between SS75 and SS80

Page 23: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 23

Distribution of high energy (Ek>20 MeV) hadron fluence with and w/o concrete block in front of the RF Alcove

2-dim projections in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

Comparing the color codes, the h-fluence inside the RF alcove similar with and w/o concrete block

Distance along y-axis (cm)

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p distributed between SS75 and SS80

h [1/cm2/year]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

Page 24: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 24

Distribution of 1MeV-eq neutron fluence with and w/o concrete block in front of the RF Alcove

2-dim projections in y-z plane averaged over Δx=2 m height

Comparing the color codes, the 1MeV-eq neutron fluence inside the RF alcove similar with and w/o block

for a nominal MTE operation year with 2.3×10+17 lost p distributed between SS75 and SS80

1MeV-eq n [1/cm

2/year]

SS75 w/o local shielding

Distance along y-axis (cm)

Dis

tanc

e al

ong

z-ax

is (c

m)

SS75 locally shielded

Page 25: Local Shielding around the             PS Straight Section75 ?

S. Damjanovic, CERN 25

h [1/cm2/y] RF1 - h [1/cm2/year] RF2 - h [1/cm2/year]

Option I – w/o Local Shielding around SS75 8.3×109 1.3×1010

Option II – with Local Shielding around SS75 8.3×109 1.3×1010

Option III – without present block in front of alcove 9.3×109 2.1×1010

1MeV-eq neutron [1/cm2/y] RF1 – 1MeV-eq neutron [1/cm2/year]

RF2 – 1MeV-eq neutron [1/cm2/year]

Option I – w/o Local Shielding around SS75 9.7×1010 1.2×1011

Option II – with Local Shielding around SS75 9.5×1010 1.2×1011

Option III – without present block in front of alcove 1.2×1011 1.9×1011

Dose RF1 - Dose [Gy/year] RF2 - Dose [Gy/year]

Option I – w/o Local Shielding around SS75 2.7±0.2 5.4±0.3

Option II – with Local Shielding around SS75 2.9±0.2 5.0±0.3

Option III – without present block in front of alcove 4.0±0.3 7.7±0.3

Small effects of the present concrete block:exposure of the electronics reduced only by factors of 1.2 and 1.6 for the BE/RF1 and RF2 ,resp.


Recommended