Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) AUSTRIA · Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) AUSTRIA....

EUROCONTROL

Year 2014 - Level 1

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) AUSTRIA

LSSIP Year 2014 Austria Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

LSSIP for Austria

Infocentre Reference: 15/01/12-03

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2014

LSSIP Year 2014 Austria Edition Date: 05/03/15

LSSIP Focal Point - Martin Stieber E-mail: [email protected]

Manager ATM Int’l Program Coordination

LSSIP Contact Person - Agnieszka Dybowska

E-mail: [email protected]

Unit DPS/PEPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft General Public

Draft Agency Stakeholders

Proposed Issue Restricted Audience

Released Issue

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Austria (AT) - AD\Year 2014\Released\2014 LSSIP AT Released.doc

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material

2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2013 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

3 ESSIP Report 2012 www.eurocontrol.int/pepr

4 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

5 Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

6 European ATM Master Plan https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

8 National AIP http://eaip.austrocontrol.at/

9 FAB Performance Plan http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/field_tabs/content/documents/single-sky/pru/performance-plans/au-pp.pdf

LSSIP Year 2014 Austria Released Issue

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1

Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4

Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................ 5

1.1.1 International Membership ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of FIR Wien ...................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ................................................................................. 6 1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 6

1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2 ANSP(s) .................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Airports .................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.4 Military Authorities ................................................................................................................... 11

Chapter 2 - En-Route Traffic and Capacity ........................................................................................... 13 2.1 Evolution of traffic in Austria .................................................................................................. 13 2.2 VIENNA ACC ......................................................................................................................... 14

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019 ........................................................................ 14 2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance .................................................................................................... 14 2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer ................................................................................... 15

Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 17

Chapter 4 - National Projects ................................................................................................................. 18

Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 19 5.1 FAB Co-ordination ................................................................................................................. 19 5.2 FAB Projects .......................................................................................................................... 20 5.3 Regional cooperation ............................................................................................................. 24

Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation ....................................................................................... 25 6.1 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress .......................................................................... 26 6.2 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ........................................... 40

ANNEXES

LSSIP Year 2014 Austria 1 Released Issue

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

CIV: Implementation of SERA and adoption into national law has been achieved in December 2014.

MIL: The MIL Authority in Austria is the Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS)

Traffic and Capacity

2014 has shown a technical and procedural consolidation phase for ACC, having in use the ATM Top Sky System for more than one year now. As a result, traffic in Austria (ACC plus INN corridor) increased by 6.2% during Summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2013. The annual traffic increase in the ACC reached 7,3 %, producing only 0,03 minutes ATFM delay.

For 2015-2019, the STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an annual traffic growth of between 0.9% and 4.1% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.6%.

The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 189, 6% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 178 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 165.

ESSIP Objective Implementation

With regard to objectives due for the period 2012 - 2014, there are two objectives identified as being late, namely ATC07.1 (Arrival Management Tools) and ITY-ADQ. ATC07.1 is conceived to be implemented after the implementation of TopSky System and reestablishment of Approach Wien, which is planned for November 2015.

AOP05 (Airport CDM) has been identified as being late, due to the shifted implementation of the DPI message to 2016, but it needs to be stressed that Vienna has reached the status of ‘local implementation’ in June 2014.

ITY-ADQ is in general means a flourishing project under the leadership of Austro Control. Some formal arrangements and aspects still need to be verified, but are scheduled to be signed in 2015.

Due to the successful technical implementation of CPDLC in November 2014, the objectives ITY-COTR and ITY-AGDL were completed.

In general, the number of completed objectives increased from 18 to 20, whereas 2015 will see a couple of planned objectives to be completed likewise (e.g. AOM19, ATC02.6, and ATC16.)

FCM04 (Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1) is defined as not applicable for Austria, nonetheless STAM principles as described in the objective, have been identified and to a large extent implemented. It must be noted that the implementation of this objective is executed in close cooperation within the framework of FABCE project 3.


LSSIP 2014 - Austria * FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

State-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2008

20

09

2010

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2016

20

17

2018

20

19

2020

20

21

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

[IDP] [E] *

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management [IDP] [E] *

AOM21 Implementation of Free Route Airspace [IDP] [E] *

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions [IDP] *

ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 [E] *

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 [E] *

ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools [E] *

ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring [E] *

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

[IDP] [E] *

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 *

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

[IDP] [E] *

COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)

[IDP] *

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS *

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM *

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services [E] *

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning [IDP] [E] *

FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1 [IDP] [E]

FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [IDP] [E] *

INF04 Implement integrated briefing * INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD) *ITY-ACID Aircraft identification

ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information [E] *

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 [IDP] [E] *

ITY-AGVCS2 Implement air-ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 *

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes [E] *

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) [IDP] * ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability *NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV [E] *

NAV10 Implement APV procedures [IDP] [E] *


LSSIP 2014 - Austria * FOC Date █ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)

SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements *

SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions *

SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs)

SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies

Airport-related ESSIP Objectives

<=

2008

20

09

2010

20

11

2012

20

13

2014

20

15

2016

20

17

2018

20

19

2020

20

21

LOWW-Vienna

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1

[E] *

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 *

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) [IDP] [E] *

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

[IDP] *

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports *

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partly Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Austria does not participate in this obj.)

Late

E= Essential – Master Plan Reference IDP = Interim Deployment Programme

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2014 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2014.

The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;

Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


Chapter 1 - National ATM Environment

1.1 Geographical Scope

1.1.1 International Membership

Austria is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC

1955

EUROCONTROL 1993

European Union 1995

EASA 2003

ICAO 1948

JAA 1990

NATO N/A Partnership for peace since 1995

ITU 1866

1.1.2 Geographical description of FIR Wien

FIR WIEN is surrounded by FIRs of 8 States, namely Germany, (FIR Munchen), Czech Republic (FIR Praha), Slovak Republic (FIR Bratislava), Hungary (FIR Budapest), Slovenia (FIR Ljubljana), Italy (FIR Milano), Switzerland (FIR Zurich) and Croatia (FIR Zagreb) as adjacent FIR to the MURA Sector (Slovenian Airspace) which is delegated to Austria. Further details to be found in Austrian eAIP:

http://eaip.austrocontrol.at/lo/150206/Charts/ENR/LO_ENR_6_6_en.pdf


1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation

The detailed Airspace classification is shown at Annex D.

1.2 National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Austria are the following:

- The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which is part of the MoTIT and which performs the function of the Austrian Regulatory Authority (Oberste Zivilluftfahrt Behörde),

- The Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (MoTIT / NSA),

- Austro Control ‘Luftfahrtagentur (LFA)’, NSA for civil ATCO licensing.

- The Accident Investigation Board which is an independent Body within the MoTIT,

- Austro Control, the sole ANS Provider in Austria,

- The Federal Ministry of Defence and Joint Forces Command / Air.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the figure below:

Other main National Stakeholders are the 6 main Airports in Austria. They are operated by public and public/private enterprises.

Institutional Arrangements and Links

Joint Forces Command

Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports

(MoD)

Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation

and Technology

as supreme CAA / NSA

(MoTIT)

AUSTRO CONTROL


1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)

1.2.1.1 General information

Civil Aviation in Austria is the responsibility of the Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (M of TIT) which represents Austria at the EUROCONTROL Decision Making Bodies.

The Regulator is institutionally separated from the ANS Service Provider. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) is part of the MoTIT (Oberste Zivilluftfahrtbehörde).

The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The Civil Aviation Authority is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis

Rule-making CAA Aviation Act

(BGBl Nr. 253/1957)

Safety Oversight NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section. 120c and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are

described in AASREF (ministerial decree)

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c, d and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are


Airspace CAA/Austro Control Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 119, 120 a,c and section 124. SMS and Safety

Oversight are described in AASREF (ministerial decree)

Economic NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are


Environment NSA as part of the CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are


Security CAA Aviation Act (BGBl Nr. 253/1957) section 120c and section 141. SMS and Safety Oversight are


Accident investigation SUB (Sicherheitsuntersuchungsstelle des Bundes)

§ 136 Aviation Act and

§2 UUG 2005, BGBl. I Nr. 123/2005


1.2.1.2 Austrian Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)

MoTIT incorporates the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) which performs at the same time the function of the Austrian Regulatory Authority (Oberste Zivil – Luftfahrtbehörde).

ATM Safety occurrence analysis is done by the ANSP and there is a separate Accident Investigation Board as an independent body within the MoTIT; details can be found in chapter 1.2.5.

CAA Web site is the same as the NSA one: www.bmvit.gv.at.

Annual Report published: Y

To ensure conformity with Art. 12, Commission Regulation (EC) 549/2004, continuous reporting takes place through EASA Audit Reports, answering of pilot procedures and the LSSIP reporting process.

An organisational chart of MoTIT is given in Annex B

1.2.2 ANSP(s)

1.2.2.1 AustroControl GmbH

Name of the ANSP: Austro Control Österreichische Gesellschaft für Zivilluftfahrt mbH

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: 100% Republic of Austria

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Aerodrome(s) Y

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET Y

ATCO training Y

SAR Y

Others Y Certification of Aircraft, Pilot licensing, Medical check for pilots and ATCOs

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y German regional airports (ATS-TWR for 9 German regional Airports)

Annual Report published: Y The latest annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP in 2013 can be found under: http://www.austrocontrol.at/jart/prj3/austro_control/data/uploads/PCG_Bericht.pdf

Address of ANSP website: www.austrocontrol.at

An organisational chart is given in Annex B.


1.2.2.2 ANSP Meteo Serve Wetterdienst GmbH

Name of the ANSP: Meteo Serve Wetterdienst GmbH

Governance: GmbH Ownership: 100% Austro Control

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route N

ATC approach N

ATC Aerodrome(s) N

AIS N

CNS N

MET Y only certified MET-Provider, no designation

ATCO training N

SAR N

Others N

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

N

Annual Report published: N

1.2.2.3 ATC system in use

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales Group / Topsky in cooperation with COOPANS for the ENROUTE part; TATM (Vienna ATM System / VAS) in use for the lower airspace (APPs and major TWRs) TWR Vienna: Electronic Flight strip system DIFLIS

Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? First implementation 28/02/2013. Regular functional updates twice per year. Extension to service for the terminal units will take place in November 2015. Surveillance data processing is primarily based on several Mode-S radars within and outside the FIR, using ARTAS tracker.

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Complete replacement of the TATM/VAS is planned in November 2015

1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


1.2.2.4 ATC units

The ATC units in the Austrian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

Wien ACC Max 18 ** Refer to 1.4.1 The hardware/software configuration of the A-ATMS allows a theoretical maximum of 18 elementary sectors The current demand is served by a maximum of 12 sectors (during daytime).

Wien APP 6 FIR Praha, Bratislava and Budapest

TWR and APP Wien in the TWR Wien building

SALZBURG 1 LAU* SALZBURG

INNSBRUCK 1 LAU* INNSBRUCK

LINZ 1 LAU* LINZ

GRAZ 1 LAU* GRAZ

KLAGENFURT 1 LAU* KLAGENFURT

* LAU=Local Approach Unit

** Note that the number of sectors, as indicated in this Table, is the maximum number of civilian control sectors that can be operated simultaneously by the unit, provided there is sufficient availability of ATCOs. Due to FRQ limitations a theoretical maximum of 16 sectors can be achieved.

1.2.3 Airports

1.2.3.1 General information

The main airports in Austria are operated by public and public/private enterprises. They are listed in the table below. As the sole ANS Provider, Austro Control provides Air Traffic Services at the airports.

Terminal Airspace (TMA or equivalent)

Airport Controlled by

WIEN WIEN/ SCHWECHAT TWR and APP Wien in the TWR Wien building

SALZBURG SALZBURG LAU*

INNSBRUCK INNSBRUCK LAU*

LINZ LINZ LAU*

GRAZ GRAZ LAU*

KLAGENFURT KLAGENFURT LAU*

* LAU = Local Approach Unit

1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, INF07, ITY-ADQ and SAF11.

In addition to the Annex B of the ESSIP Plan edition 2014, it is up to the individual State to decide which

additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

The following airport is covered in this LSSIP: WIEN Schwechat.


1.2.4 Military Authorities

The Military Authority in Austria is the Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS) .

The Military Aviation Division = Abteilung Militaerluftfahrt (MLF) is part of the Ministry of Defence and Sports (MoD = BMLVS) and is responsible for Air Traffic Management (ATM) plus Air Navigation Services (ANS). Co-ordination with Ministry of Transport at strategic level is done via the ATS coordination board = Lenkungsausschuss Flugsicherung (LAF).

The planning of airspace use at pre-tactical level is done via the civil/military joint unit Airspace Management Cell (AMC).

Day-to-day co-ordination of Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) is handled at the tactical level between Austro Control and representatives of the Military Control Centre (MCC).

Austro Control is the sole Austrian ATS provider and allocates airspace to military units on a temporary basis. Military ATS is normally provided only to OAT, and additionally to GAT within Military Training Areas (MTA) on and around Air Force bases.

1.2.4.1 Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

Oversight

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

Y

Level of such legal provision: State Law, Aviation Act Level of such legal provision: Y

Authority signing such legal provision: Austrian Government

Authority signing such legal provision: MOD / MLF

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y

OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y OAT/GAT Co-ordination Y

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y

ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N

ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Y

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Y

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: N/A Additional Information: N/A

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: N/A

National AIP Y National AIP Y

National Military AIP N/A National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N

Other: Aeronautical Charts Y Other: Aeronautical Charts Y

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: MoD NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: Y

Additional information: N/A Additional information: N/A

For TRG and licensing of MIL ATC personnel MIL NSA


1.2.4.2 Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate:

N/A

Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

Y

Additional Information: N/A

1.2.4.3 User role

1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route Y En-Route within MIL TRG Areas Y

Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y

Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y

AIS Y AIS Y

MET Y MET Y

SAR Y SAR Y

MIL Training Area (MTA) monitoring

Y FIS Y

Other: N/A Other: N/A

Additional Information: Additional Information:

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y

Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service Y

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: Y

No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges Y

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y

CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y

Others: N/A

Military in Austria applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




Chapter 2 - En-Route Traffic and Capacity

2.1 Evolution of traffic in Austria

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F

IFR

flig

hts

Austria - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast

International Dep/Arr

27%

Domestic flights 2%

Overflights 71%

Austria - Distribution (Ref. year 2013)

A = ActualF = Forecast

2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F

H 3.9% 3.9% 4.9% 4.0% 4.0% 3.7% 4.6%

B 1.5% -1.8% -1.7% 3.5% 2.2% 3.1% 2.5% 2.5% 2.8% 3.0%

L 3.2% 0.3% 1.0% 0.9% 1.2% 1.2% 1.3%

ESRA08 B 3.1% -2.4% -1.1% 1.8% 2.4% 2.8% 2.3% 2.3% 2.8% 3.1%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2014)IFR flights yearly growth

Austria

2014

Traffic in Austria (ACC plus INN corridor) increased by 6.2% during Summer 2014 (May to October inclusive), when compared to the same period during 2013.

2015-2019

The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an annual traffic growth of between 0.9% and 4.1% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.6%.


2.2 VIENNA ACC

2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2010-2019

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Peak Day Traffic 2598 2782 2788 2733 3060

Summer Traffic 2293 2347 2303 2275 2481

Yearly Traffic 1969 2015 1961 1916 2032

Summer Traffic Forecast 2523 2598 2667 2735 2820

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 2571 2692 2803 2922 3027

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 2489 2501 2530 2558 2594

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 2.21 0.34 0.27 0.28 0.04

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 1.53 0.23 0.16 0.26 0.03

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

ght)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

LOVVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2014 to 31/10/2014

2.2.2 Summer 2014 performance

Traffic Evolution 2014 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity

gap Ref value Actual

+9.1 % 189 (+6%) 0.24 0.04 No

The average en-route delay per flight decreased from 0.3 minutes per flight in Summer 2013 to zero minutes per flight in Summer 2014.

Capacity Plan 7 % Achieved Comments

Enhanced sectorization according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Yes

Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC Yes

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM Yes

6 additional controllers Yes

Re-assessment of sector capacities according to CAPAN study Yes

Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels Yes

Stepped improved sectorisation according to on-going projects Yes

Improved procedures with EDDM APP Yes

DCTs H24/7 345+ in parallel ops with ATS routes Yes

Maximum configuration: 13 sectors Yes

Summer 2014 performance assessment

The ACC capacity baseline was measured with ACCESS at 189, 6% higher than in 2013. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 178 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 165.


2.2.3 Planning Period 2015-2019 - Summer

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

2015 2016 2017 2018 20190.21 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.190.33 0.32 0.32 0.31 0.31

LOVVCTAAnnual

Summer

En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference Values

H 199 5% 210 6% 219 4% 228 4% 235 3%

Ref. 194 3% 201 4% 208 3% 215 3% 221 3%

L 191 1% 193 1% 196 2% 199 2% 203 2%

Open 190 1% 196 3% 202 3% 209 3% 213 2%

C/R 189 0% 192 2% 195 2% 199 2% 203 2%

LOVV 189

Capacity Profiles

ACC2014

baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Capacity Plan

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Free Route Airspace

DCTs H24/7 165+ in parallel ops with ATS

routes

DCTs H24/7 165+ in parallel ops with ATS

routes Cross border DCTs FAB

intern & with adjacent ACCs where possible

FRA Wien 165+

stepwise increase of FAB CE

wide cross border FRA applications

full FAB CE wide cross

border application of DCT/FRA H24

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

ASM

Airport & TMA Network Integration

AMAN LOWW

Cooperative Traffic Management

Improved ATFCM techniques, including STAM

Airspace

Enhanced sectorisation according to the FAB CE Airspace Plan Stepped improved sectorisation according to on-going projects

Additional layer Top sector

Procedures Improved operational procedures including FMP/AMC

Data link (Oct 2014)

Staffing Recruitment to maintain staff level

Technical SYSCO with neighbouring

units

Capacity Additional sectors as required, depending on traffic demand levels

Significant Events COOPANS for

LO APPs (Nov 2015)

3rd Runway

Munich

Max sectors 13 14 14 14 14

Capacity increase p.a. 5% 5% 3% 3% 3%

Reference profile 3% 4% 3% 3% 3%

Additional information


2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2015‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 194 201 208 215 221

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 190 196 202 209 213

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 189 192 195 199 203

Capacity Profile ‐ High 199 210 219 228 235

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 191 193 196 199 203

Capacity Baseline 180 189

2015 ‐ 2019 Plan 198 208 214 220 227

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

LOVVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook

Vienna ACC will have sufficient capacity to cope with the expected traffic growth during the planning period.


Chapter 3 - ESSIP Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2013 applicable to Austria for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Reference number

Recommendation Ownership

REC-2013-1 (11) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-AGDL to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

AT, IT, PT, SK, SI, SE, NO, RS, ES,

ME, FR, MT

State feedback: CPDLC / AGDL has been fully implemented on 17th of October 2014

REC-2013-1 (12) Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-ADQ to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

IE, AL, AT, LT, CZ, SI, PT, NO, NL, FR,

DE, ES, UK, HU

State feedback: A pattern for a formal arrangement (ADQ Compliance checklist) has been developed and issued by Austro Control, and has been approved by NSA. Several formal arrangements have been already signed, but not yet all of them.

REC-2013-1 (15)

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of ITY-COTR to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.

AT, BE, DE, DK, BA, ES, IT, FR, GE, MT, HR, HU, IE, NO, SK,

UK, PT, SI

State feedback: Following the Implementation of CPDLC/AGDL, the required messages LOF/NAN have been successfully implemented. Objective completed.

REC-2013-4 Ensure better planning reliability at local level. All States

State feedback: Planning reliability is strongly dependent on own commitments, but in case of interoperability issues also on commitments of partners / adjacent units. For Austria, early indications of delays will be taken in due consideration. Example: ATC 7.1 / AMAN tools

REC-2013-5 The ANSPs should ensure synchronised system evolution between neighbouring States.

All ECAC ANSPs

State feedback: Enhanced cooperation on a bilateral basis and in conjunction with FABCE Implementation roadmap (eg. ATM system requirements for Free Route roadmap)

REC-2013-15

The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers.

FAB ANSPs

State feedback: Enhanced cooperation on a bilateral basis and in conjunction with FABCE Implementation roadmap (eg. ATM system requirements for Free Route roadmap)


Chapter 4 - National Projects

The main national projects currently ongoing in Austro Control are depicted in the table below

Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references

Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas *

Austrocontrol (AT) eTOD Database Phase 1 (AIM / ATM System)

establish a Data base and basic software including GUI to collect the required terrain and obstacle data.

implementation of the eTOD requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018.

ongoing ESSIP:INF07

OI-Steps: - Other: -

Capacity: -

Safety: detailed and more precise Terrain and Obstacle data Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Implementation of Voice over IP technology (COM Services)

Implementation of Voice over IP technology for all ATM units

2020 ongoing ESSIP:COM11


Capacity: -

Safety: improved information consistency Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: improved FAB interoperability

8,33 FRQ channel spacing below FL195 (COM Services )

According to EU IR 1079/2012, the conversion to 8,33 kHz will be implemented below FL195, including Airport VIE.

31st December 2018

ongoing ESSIP:ITY-AGVCS2


Capacity: -

Safety: The justification results from operator´s obligation from 1st January 2018 not to operate an aircraft in airspace where carriage of radio is required unless the aircraft radio equipment has the 8,33 kHz channel spacing capability. The same situation appea Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -


Chapter 5 - Regional Co-ordination

5.1 FAB Co-ordination

Having signed and ratified the Agreement on the Establishment of Functional Airspace Block Central Europe, Austria is part of the FAB CE project together with Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia.

The FAB CE States agreed on establishment of the following permanent bodies - the FAB CE Council, NSA Coordination Committee and Joint Civil-Military Airspace Coordination Committee. The FAB CE Council can also establish other bodies necessary for the implementation, operation and further development of the FAB CE Project. For this reason the FAB CE Legal Committee and the FAB CE Performance Body (responsible for preparation of FAB CE Performance Plan for RP2) are established.

Air navigation service providers of FAB CE countries established and signed the foundation deed of a joint venture on 17 October 2014, at Brnik, Slovenia - FABCE Aviation Services, Ltd. The company will be responsible for the professional management of various regional air navigation projects. The establishment of this joint venture is not only effectively aiming at the progress of FAB CE programme, but at the same time the Single European Sky programme of the European Union.

The FAB CE Strategy was finalized and approved in June 2014, driven by a need to move towards seamless operations in a way that ensures safe and efficient operations. The document describes environment in which the FAB CE is being developed and defines strategic objectives and targets in order to meet the SES performance requirements. The four priority areas are: Performance, Safety, Free Route Airspace and EU targets.

A FAB CE Performance Plan (for AT, CZ, HR, HU, SI and SK) was presented on 29 April 2014 at stakeholders’ consultation meeting between the representatives of FAB CE (states, national supervisory bodies, service providers) and airspace users (airlines) in Prague. FAB CE Performance Plan in its version 1 was sent to European Commission in June 2014.

A Letter on inter-FAB cooperation was signed on 8 September 2014 by the State level bodies of FAB Central Europe and the BLUEMED FAB, in the interest of improved co-ordination on the policies adopted for improving ANS/ATM in Europe. The respective ANSP cooperation agreement was signed on 27 August 2014.

Two Social Dialogue forums were held in April and November 2014 with wide variety of participants – ANSP CEOs, FAB CE project management, social partners, trade unions and also the EC representative.


5.2 FAB Projects



ASP ANS CR (CZ), Austrocontrol (AT), BHANSA (BA), CCL Service Provider (HR), Hungarocontrol (HU), LPS SR (SK), Sloveniacontrol (SI)

Air Ground Data Link (FAB CE P16)

The objective of the project is to support a harmonised implementation of AGDL as one of the key areas of IDP (IDP4: AGDL) and enabler to achieve the flight efficiency and capacity growth and at the same time to reduce both the pilots and controllers workload. In order to realise expected benefits the project will: identify and define all technical, organisational and operational measures which are necessary to provide a seamless area of Air-Ground Data Link operation inside FAB CE; identify and define all aspects, inputs and prerequisites to trigger a common procurement process for contracting the Communications Service; coordinate and support the local implementations to achieve benefits at FAB CE level.

Initiation: 19.6.2013

Ongoing activity ESSIP:ITY-AGDL

OI-Steps: AUO-0301 Other: IDP AA 4

Capacity: Implementation of FAB CE seamless area of AGDL operations will lead to capacity increase. Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Improve cost efficiency through common procurement of the Communications Service.

ANSP Charging (FAB CE P15)

The objective of the project is to identify how the Single Unit Rate or other modification to the charging mechanism can support Free Route Airspace implementation from the point of view of the revenue distribution and capacity utilization of FABCE ANSPs.


Ongoing activity ESSIP:-


Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Improve cost-effciency, mitigation of financial risks

ANSP Performance Review Process (FAB CE P9)

Project ensured that relevant processes are in place to improve performance through common monitoring, review and planning; supporting decision making of FAB CE bodies and ANSPs.

Initiation: 3.1.2011 Completed: 29.5.2013

Completed ESSIP:-


Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Contingency (FAB CE P8)

The objective of the project is to assess whether the other FAB CE ATC units can absorb the traffic in case of a failure of one FAB CE ATC unit and the closure of the airspace of this state.




Capacity: -

Safety: Improve safety through common contingency Environment: -




Cost-Efficiency: -

Coordination of FAB CE common approach to Aircraft Identification (FAB CE P11)

Project aimed at operational use of Mode S ELS as sole source method of aircraft identification within FAB CE region before 2015.


Completed (last deliverable approved 19.12.2012); monitoring of national implementation is ongoing.

ESSIP:-


Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Coordinated implementation of ELS contributes to cost-efficiency.

Deployment of FAB CE Competence Scheme (FAB CE P13)

The objective of the project is to implement the agreed measures described in the FAB CE Competence/Transition Plan to fill in the remaining detected gaps towards full harmonisation of ATCOs competence. It will progressively extend to AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP, where the level of harmonisation is currently lower. The coordination with NSAs will be the essential part of the project activities.




Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Cost-efficiency of training

Flexible, Efficient and Safe Operations (FAB CE P2)

The objective of the project is to develop and/or harmonise operational requirements at FAB CE level as necessary to maximise the efficiency and safety of air traffic operations such as the fluent and flexible transfer of responsibility together with the assessment and implementation of the respective Activity Areas of the Interim Deployment Plan (IDP).


Ongoing activity ESSIP:ATC17, FCM03 OI-Steps: CM-0201, DCB-0302, IS-0101, IS-0102 Other: IDP WP1.1 IDP WP5.2

Capacity: Optimisation of FAB CE Air Traffic Managent Performance as defined in FAB CE Implementation Plan Safety: See "Capacity" Environment: See "Capacity" Cost-Efficiency: -

Frequency management (FAB CE P6)

The project contributes to increase capacity and efficiency through enabling cross-border operations and sectorisation changes; rationalisation of the FAB CE area radio sites will contribute to cost-efficiency.


Frozen ESSIP:-


Capacity: Increase capacity and efficiency through enabling cross-border operations and sectorisation changes. Safety: - Environment: See "Capacity". Cost-Efficiency: Rationalisation of the FAB CE area radio sites will contribute to cost-efficiency. See also "Capacity".

Functional The objective of the project is to optimise Initiation: Ongoing activity ESSIP:AOM19, Capacity: Improve performance through




integration of ASM/ATFCM processes (FAB CE P3)

the flow of air traffic and the management of airspace within FAB CE, taking into account the FAB CE airspace plan and ensuring consistency with the wider European network operations together with the assessment and implementation of the Rolling ASM/ATFCM Processes and STAM IDP Activity Areas.

29.10.2010 FCM05

OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, DCB-0102, DCB-0203 Other: IDP WP1.2

implementation of regular processes for the functional integration of pre-tactical ASM/ATFCM processes and STAM; enhance civil-military cooperation and contributing to full application of FUA in FAB CE airspace. Safety: - Environment: See "Capacity" Cost-Efficiency: See "Capacity"

FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning (FAB CE P1)

The objective of P1 is the optimal use of the airspace within FAB CE, taking into account air traffic flows while ensuring consistency with the wider European network together with the assessment and implementation of the Free Route Airspace concept.


Ongoing activity ESSIP:AOM21

OI-Steps: AOM-0401, AOM-0402 Other: IDP WP2.3

Capacity: Improve performance (capacity, - flight efficiency), implementation of FUA, implementation of the agreed Airspace Plan. Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: See "Capacity".

FMTP Implementation (FAB CE P4)

The project was aimed at introduction of FMTP on FAB CE Level provides enhancements to the ATS in terms of reliability, maintainability and cost effectiveness, as an expected result of introduction of modern and harmonised technology.


Completed (monitoring of national implementations is ongoing)

ESSIP:ITY-FMTP

OI-Steps: CM-0201-A Other: -

Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: See project description.

ID CG (FAB CE IDCG)

ID CG is a body established to support the activities of SC and CEOC in the area of FAB CE strategic planning based on the SESAR Interim Deployment Programme. It is coordinating and monitoring the implementation of IDP elements within FAB CE.

Initiation: 08.09.2011 as IP1 CG and in 2012 it was renamed to ID CG.

- ESSIP:-


Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Regional Communications Infrastructure Development (FAB CE P5)

The objective of the project is to design, develop and implement the FAB CE Regional COM Infrastructure.


Ongoing activity ESSIP:COM09

OI-Steps: - Other: IDP WP5.1

Capacity: Support capacity increase and safety through development of regional communication network infrastructure and harmonising A-G / G-G technology for communication infrastructure. Safety: See "Capacity". Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Safety (FAB The project contributed to safe Initiation: Completed (Safety activities ESSIP:- Capacity: -




CE P7) implementation of FAB CE; optimising safety related resources through common safety management principles.

3.1.2011 Completed: 31.12.2012

carry on under other bodies) OI-Steps: -

Other: - Safety: See project description.

Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Technical Services harmonisation and optimisation (FAB CE P10)

P10 objective is to develop: The Surveillance strategy and optimisation of the surveillance infrastructure; The NAVAIDS strategy and optimization of the NAV infrastructure; Concept of the SMC and harmonisation of the technical operations; Harmonise the management of technical infrastructure such as data sharing, spare parts etc.



OI-Steps: - Other: IDP WP5.2

Capacity: Improve capacity, cost-effectiveness and efficiency through harmonisation and optimisation of technical services (CNS), focusing on SUR infrasctructure, NAV infrastructure, SMC, data sharing, spare parts. Safety: - Environment: See "Capacity". Cost-Efficiency: See "Capacity".

Training Facilities (FAB CE P14)

The objective of the project is to define and fully harmonise the training of ATCOs, AMC/FMP Staff and ATSEP based on the Common Competence Schemes defined by FAB CE P13, focus on achieving an optimal use of ATM staff and higher cost efficiency in training. All above in order to facilitate the development of the same performance standards, interoperability, common licensing and increase in performance and quality by applying best practices and exchanging resources.


- ESSIP:-


Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: Contributes to develop the network human capital and improve its flexibility.

Austrocontrol (AT) ATM system and Sub-System evolution for COTR (ATM System)

Implementation of OLDI messages according to national and FAB roadmap - Transfer of Communication - Transfer of Coordination

Dependent on bilateral implementation until 2016

- ESSIP:ATC17, ITY-COTR OI-Steps: CM-0201 Other: -

Capacity: reduced ATCO workload

Safety: interoperability for improved consistency and improved safety net performance Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: -

Mode S and WAM implementation (SUR Service)

As of 31/03/2015 the basis for correlation will be to use the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and A-WAM

Mid 2015 ongoing ESSIP:ITY-ACID


Capacity: -

Safety: - Environment: - Cost-Efficiency: improved FAB interoperability according to FAB CE ACID Implementation Plan


5.3 Regional cooperation

No specific regional projects


Chapter 6 - ESSIP Objective Implementation

Conventions

Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:

o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)

State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date

REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement

ASP. Progress (**)

ASP Impl. Date

MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement

MIL. Progress (**)

MIL Impl. Date

APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement

APO. Progress (**)

APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late


6.1 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

[IDP]

Planned

Based on an agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) the described objectives are planned, respectively will be closely monitored within the European and FABCE context.National agreements between MoD and MoT will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date.

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

National agreements between MoD and MoT (Ressort‐bereinkommen) will be established with respect to EUROAT by due date.

Planned

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Based on an agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) ‐ 'Ressortübereinkommen'

Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2018)

planned to be based on the agreement between Ministry of Transport (BMVIT) and MoD (BMLVS) ‐ 'Ressortübereinkommen'

Planned

31/12/2018

AOM19

Implement Advanced Airspace Management

Timescales:

Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

[IDP]

Planned

AMC has been implemented and is fully operational since March 2010. Further enhancements are planned according to the described objective process and common FABCE implementations. CDRs are operationally used according to the ASM handbook.

31/12/2015

ASP (By:12/2016)

AMC has been implemented and is fully operational since March 2010. Further enhancements are planned according to the described objective process and common FABCE implementations. CDRs are operationally used according to the ASM handbook. As a follow up procedure and in favour of an interoperable system, a future ASM support system as successor of the existing CIAM is conceived and under consideration.

Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes

Planned

31/12/2015

AOM21

Implementation of Free Route Airspace

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

a) At present FRA implementation has been achieved through publication of night DCTs within ACC Wien (2200/2300 ‐ 0400/0500 UTC) from FL165/245 to FL660. b) FRA operations on DCT basis H24/7 above FL165 and partial removal of night ATS routes WEF AIRAC December 2014. c) final FRA cross border implementation is conceived in context of the FRA project for FABCE and with adjacent FABEC partners. d) full ATM system adaptations by 2016 at the latest

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2017)

a) At present FRA implementation has been achieved through publication of night DCTs within ACC Wien (2200/2300 ‐ 0400/0500 UTC) from FL165/245 to FL660. b) FRA operations on DCT basis H24/7 above FL165 and partial removal of night ATS routes WEF AIRAC December 2014. c) final FRA cross border implementation is conceived in context of the FRA project for FABCE and with adjacent FABEC partners. d) full ATM system adaptations by 2016 at the latest

FAB CE Strategic Operational Planning

Planned

31/12/2016


AOP03

Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions

Timescales:


[IDP]

Completed

Objective completed at State level (and at Vienna Airport as far as airport authorities are concerned). There are also local safety Teams performing the European Action Plan at regional airports.

30/04/2011

REG (By:12/2013) Objective completed.

Completed

30/04/2011

ASP (By:12/2013) Objective completed.

Completed

30/04/2011

APO (By:12/2013)

Objective completed at Vienna Airport. There are also local safety Teams performing the European Action Plan in regional airports.

Completed

30/04/2011

AOP04.1

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1

Timescales:


Completed

LOWW - Vienna

A‐SMGCS is used as an advisory tool since June 2004. The required technical equipment is installed and in operation. See AIP

The required safety assessment documentation by the ANSP has been delivered in dec. 2013.

31/12/2013

REG (By:12/2010)

The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework has been delayed until 12/2013, due to consideration and application of Interoperability regulatory requirements (Required Declarations). The required safety assessment documentation by the ANSP has been delivered in dec. 2013.

Completed

31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2011)

Operational procedures defined and the related safety case are pending the regulatory approval. The Certification of technical equipements and operational procedures are thus planned for 2011. The required safety assessment is still pending.

Completed

31/12/2011

APO (By:12/2010) The APO SLOAs are completed for Vienna airport.

Completed

31/12/2004

AOP04.2

Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2

Timescales:


Completed

LOWW - Vienna

The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework has been issued in Dec 2013 31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2017)

Operational procedures defined and the related safety case is pending for the regulatory approval. The Certification of technical equipment and of operational procedures are thus planned by mid 2013.

Completed

30/09/2013

APO (By:12/2017)

The approval of the changes in the Regulatory Framework was delayed till mid 2013 due to consideration and application of Interoperability regulatory requirements (Required Declarations) as well as the certification of technical equipment and operational procedures (although in place).

Completed

31/12/2009


AOP05

Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

Timescales:


[IDP]

Late

LOWW - Vienna

The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June 2014. Stepwise completion according to the A‐CDM project in order to reach the status of 'full implementation' is conceived until mid 2016, dependent on the DPI implementation.

30/06/2016

ASP (By:01/2016)

The Airport CDM project has been implemented and reached the status of 'locally implemented' in June 2014. Stepwise completion according to A‐CDM project in order to reach the sttus of 'full implementation' is conceived until mid 2016

Partly Completed

31/01/2016

APO (By:01/2016)

Majority of APO tasks is fulfilled, specific LoAs were ratified. DPI implementation planned by mid 2016

Late

30/06/2016

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Completed

The EUROCONTROL Specification has been approved for usage in Austria. STCA level 2 fully deployed in the current ATM system (Enroute Top Sky)

31/03/2013

ASP (By:01/2013)

STCA level 2 fully deployed in the current area of responsibility of ATM system (En Route Top Sky).

The Military uses the civil infrastructure.

Completed

31/03/2013

ATC02.5

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Completed

APW function according to the ECTL guideline has been implemented being part of the new ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since 03/2013.

31/03/2013

ASP (By:12/2016)

APW function according to the ECTL guideline has been implemented being part of the new ATM System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien since 03/2013.

The Military CC uses AUSTRO CONTROL ATM systems. The APW function according to the ECTL guideline is implemented in the current ATM system. As an enhanced version, it will form part of the new ATC System (NG‐AATMS) also for MCC Wien, implementation planned 04/2015.

Completed

31/03/2013

ATC02.6

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Planned

This function is planned in phase 1 to be implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien. Phase 2 will encompass APP Wien and Local APP Units (LAUs) to be implemented by end of November 2015. The Military will use the civil ATM system functionality.

30/11/2015

ASP (By:12/2016)

This function is planned in phase 1 to be implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) for ACC Wien. Phase 2 will encompass APP Wien and Local APP Units (LAUs) to be implemented by end of November 2015.The Military will use the civil ATM system functionality.

Planned

30/11/2015


ATC02.7

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2

Timescales:


Planned

This function is planned to be implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) in Phase 2 for APP Wien and Local APP Units in Nov. 2015. The operational release for APM is scheduled for mid 2016. The civil infrastructure applies for MIL likewise.

30/06/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

This function is planned to be implemented as part of the new ATC System (Top Sky) in Phase 2 for APP Wien and Local APP Units in Nov. 2015. The operational release for APM is scheduled for mid 2016.

Planned

30/06/2016

ATC07.1

Implement arrival management tools

Timescales:


Late

Implementation of the TopSky ATM System for APP Wien is foreseen in November 2015. Only thereafter the integrated AMAN functionality of TopSky will be re‐evaluated for a later implementation. Since 2009, DFS and AUSTROCONTROL are applying Arrival Management procedures by receiving and transmitting 'time to lose' and 'time to gain' information via AMA message exchange.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2015)

Implementation of the TopSky ATM System for APP Wien is foreseen in November 2015. Only thereafter the integrated AMAN functionality of TopSky will be re‐evaluated for a later implementation. Since 2009, DFS and AUSTROCONTROL are applying Arrival Management procedures by receiving and transmitting 'time to lose' and 'time to gain' information via AMA message exchange.

Late

31/12/2016

ATC12

Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring

Timescales:


Completed

Full operation achieved with implementation of Top Sky March 2013. 31/03/2013

ASP (By:12/2016) Full operation achieved with implementation of Top Sky March 2013

Completed

31/03/2013

ATC15

Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

Timescales:


[IDP]

Completed

The information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN are in place for ACC Vienna. ATC system is compliant with AMAN use in En Route.

31/03/2013

ASP (By:12/2017)

En Route: information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN are in place for ACC Vienna. ATC system is compliant to AMAN use in En Route.

Completed

31/03/2013


ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1

Timescales:


Planned

Austria fulfills the supervising obligations in accordance with EU regulation 1332/2011 and has achieved the training and performance monitoring actions. MIL transport A/C will be adequately equipped by 31/03/2015

31/03/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Austria fulfills the supervising obligations in accordance with EU regulation 1332/2011

Completed

31/12/2014

ASP (By:03/2012)

Austro Control is in the process of implementing the EU regulation 1332/2011 and has achieved the training and performance monitoring actions.

Completed

31/03/2012

MIL (By:12/2015) MIL transport A/C will be equipped by 31/03/2015

Planned

31/03/2015

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

Implementation of Electronic Dialogue messages will be implemented in several phases. First stage will be the limited use within the AoR, further applications are bound to the COTR implementation roadmap for FABCE and the remaining adjacent units.

31/03/2017

ASP (By:12/2018)

Implementation of Electronic Dialogue messages will be implemented in several phases. First stage will be the limited use within the AoR; further applications are bound to the COTR implementation roadmap for FABCE and the remaining adjacent units.

ATM system and Sub‐System evolution for COTR / Flexible, Efficient and Safe Operations

Partly Completed

31/03/2017

COM09

Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)

Timescales:


[IDP]

Completed

Austria follows the European roadmap. Technical implementation for IPv6 has been fully achieved with all adjacent units in 12/2014. except PADOVA, which is planned by end of January 2015. MIL intends to be technically adapted by 12/2014 in conjunction with TOPSKYimplementation. NO international communication exchange is executed at MIL level.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2014)

Austria follows the European roadmap. Technical implementation for IPv6 has been fully achieved with ALL adjacent units in 12/2014. MIL intends to be technically adapted by 12/2014 in conjunction with TOPSKYimplementation. NO international communication exchange is executed at MIL level.

Regional Communications Infrastructure Development

Completed

31/12/2014


COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS

Timescales:


Completed

Austro Control has implemented the complete required infrastructure and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Operational AMHS connections are in place with several COM Centres within Europe. (e.g. Sarajevo, Bratislava, Eurocontrol NM, UK , DFS and additional 8 COM Centres... tendency: increasing...) ACG will also proactively support the extended ATMHS application.

31/12/2014

ASP (By:12/2014)

Austro Control has implemented the complete required infrastructure and is prepared for AMHS transfer. Operational AMHS connections are in place with several COM Centres within Europe. (e.g. Sarajevo, Bratislava, Eurocontrol NM, UK , DFS and additional 8 COM Centres... tendency: increasing...) ACG will also proactively support the extended ATMHS application.

Austro control is the sole ANSP. The MIL unit is not an ANSP. AirDefence Centre is AMHS compatible and capable.

Completed

31/12/2014

COM11

Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

Timescales:


Planned

Planned according to the VoIP roadmap. Initial upgrades for emergency systems in place. Upgrades for all Local Approach Units have been undertaken during 2014. Final upgrades planned till 2020 at the latest for ATCCV. The voice over IP communication to NMOC has been established since 03/2013.

For the military, VoI is planned according to the VoIP project plan.

31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

Planned according to the VoIP roadmap. Initial upgrades for emergency systems in place. Upgrades for all Local Approach Units have been undertaken during 2014. Final upgrades planned till 2020 at the latest for ATCCV. The voice over IP communication to NMOC has been established since 03/2013.

For the military, planned according to the VoIP project plan.

Implementation of Voice over IP technology

Planned

31/12/2020


ENV01

Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements

Timescales:


[IDP]

Completed

LOWW - Vienna

CDO is facilitated by ATC for airport Vienna (originally conceived for off peak periods, meanwhile performed on a regular basis) including cross border application. With effect from AIRAC November 2013, approaches are in force applying CDO by means of vectoring to the IAF below FL150 to the RWY in use. (See AIP LOWW 2‐26)

31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2013)

CDO is facilitated whenever feasible during off peak periods by ATC including cross border application. With effect from AIRAC November 2013, approaches are in force applying CDO by means of vectoring to the IAF below FL150 to the RWY in use. (See AIP LOWW 2‐26) Additionally, shortened Y‐BAR GNSS approaches are in force since Nov. 2013 for noise abatement reasons during night time.

Completed

31/12/2013

APO (By:12/2013)

These SLoAs will be implemented according to the target date i.e. end of 2013. There is a partnership agreement between AustroControl, Vienna airport and Austrian Airlines. All other Airlines are also invited. AustroControl is coordinating the actions between all partners.

Completed

31/12/2013

ENV02

Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

Timescales:


Completed

LOWW - Vienna

This objective is completed for Vienna Airport. Regular meetings of the "dialogue forum" are held between local Vienna Airport communities and Vienna Airport partners. check web page: www.dialogforum.at

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2016)

Objective completed at Vienna Airport. check web page: www.dialogforum.at

Completed

31/12/2005

APO (By:12/2016) Objective completed at Vienna Airport.

Completed

31/12/2012

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services

Timescales:


Completed

AustroControl fully completed this objective already in 2008, whereas the remaining objective FCM01‐ASP08 (DPI) is subject to the use of the runway sequencing tool and further CDM Implementation. The DPI is also described in AOP05‐APO05 and will be implemented by 12/2014 in cooperation with Airport Vienna

31/12/2008

ASP (By:07/2014)

AustroControl fully completed this objective in 2008. The remaining objective FCM01‐ASP08 (DPI) is also covered by AOP05‐APO05 and will be implemented by 11/2014 in the context of CDM.

Completed

31/12/2008


FCM03

Implement collaborative flight planning

Timescales:


[IDP]

Completed

Collaborative flight planning is fully implemented in Austria. 31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2015) Collaborative flight planning is fully implemented in Austria.

Flexible, Efficient and Safe Operations

Completed

31/12/2010

FCM04

Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1

(Outside Applicability Area)

Timescales:

‐ not applicable ‐

[IDP]

Planned

Although not in the applicability area, Austro Control supports the STAM procedures and actively takes part in STAM enhancements and implementations in context with FABCE activities, where a STAM Live Trial based on a FABCE STAM Live Trial Validation Plan, produced by a STAM working group as part of FABCE project 3, is planned for 09/2015. OTMVs (peak and sustained) are defined for the most used traffic volumes and based on these, local procedures are applied. As soon as the official STAM applicability area will include Austria and further FABCE states, more detailed infos in SLoAs will be given.

30/11/2015

ASP (By:12/2015)

Although not in the applicability area, Austro Control supports the STAM procedures and actively takes part in STAM enhancements and implementations in context with FABCE activities, where a STAM Live Trial based on a FABCE STAM Live Trial Validation Plan, produced by a STAM working group as part of FABCE project 3, is planned for 09/2015. OTMVs (peak and sustained) are defined for the most used traffic volumes and based on these, local procedures are applied. As soon as the official STAM applicability area will include Austria and further FABCE states, more detailed infos in SLoAs will be given.

Planned

30/11/2015

FCM05

Implementation of interactive rolling NOP

Timescales:


[IDP]

Planned

In the context of FABCE local/regional automated ASM support is under development. Close coordination with NMOC is ensured at FABCE level and via regional FMPs / AMCs. Airport slots are already transmitted to DDR.

31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2016)

In the context of FABCE local/regional automated ASM support is under development. Close coordination with NMOC is ensured at FABCE level and via regional FMPs / AMCs.

MIL is integral part of AMC, and MCC interface is technically ready for AIXM 5.1.

Functional integration of ASM/ATFCM processes

Planned

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2016)

Slot data for all airports in Austria are sent by SCA to the EUACA* Common Databank on a daily base (1900loc). From this databank EUACA provides the data regularly to EUROCONTROL for the use of these slot data in the DDR (DDR II) Project

Completed

31/12/2013


INF04

Implement integrated briefing

Timescales:


Completed

Objective completed. ACG runs an integrated system service, which enables its customers to plan a flight, coordinate an inner‐European flight regarding air traffic (NMOC) to complete the necessary pilot pre‐flight briefing including the MET briefing, either directly at the airport or via internet

31/12/2005

ASP (By:12/2012)

ACG runs an integrated system service, which enables its customers to plan a flight, coordinate an inner‐European flight regarding air traffic (NMOC) to complete the necessary pilot pre‐flight briefing including the MET briefing, either directly at the airport or via internet.

Not applicable to the Military. The Austrian Military Authorities are using their own briefing and FPL‐system which is tailored to their own specific needs and independent from the civil IBS. Only for flights outside Austrian airspace ‐ which is a very rare case ‐ the civil IBS is used for the retrieval of AIS and MET briefings, without using the FPL‐functions.

Completed

31/12/2005

INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)

Timescales:


Planned

NSA is planning the establishment of theTOD policy in 2015 and foresees the establishment of oversight and all regulatory tasks and activities for the TOD implementation according to the objective deadlines. The implementation of the eTOD requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018 according to the national TOD policy.

31/05/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

NSA is planning the eTOD policy in 2015 and foresees the establishment of oversight and all regulatory tasks and activities for the TOD implementation according to the objective deadlines.

Planned

31/05/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)

The implementation of the eTOD requirements is planned to be ready by May 2018 according to the national TOD policy

eTOD Database Phase 1

Planned

31/05/2018

APO (By:05/2018)

The Airport Vienna is expected to implement the required activities for the collection, management and provision of TOD in accordance with national TOD policy in time

Planned

31/05/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification

Timescales:

Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025

Partly Completed

As of 31/03/2015 the basis of Aircraft ID for En Route and TMA Vienna will be to use the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and A‐WAM. The required evidences will be delivered in time to reach the target time in March 2015. MIL Control Centre: applies the civil surveillance structure Airport VIE: applies Mode S ACID and Multilateration

31/03/2015

ASP (By:01/2020)

As of 31/03/2015 the basis for correlation will be to use the downlinked ACID by means of Mode S and A‐WAM and the required evidences will be delivered in time to reach the target time in March 2015. The following Mode S sensors are already fully installed: Linz, Wien and external sources: Muenchen, Javornik. A‐WAM and Koralpe will be operational by end January 2015

Mode S and WAM implementation

Planned

31/03/2015


ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

Timescales:

Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

Late

The data quality project, led by ACG/AIM, is running according to the project plan. Several awareness workshop were held by ACG to find proper ways to comply with ADQ together with NSA, provincial governments (en route obstacles), aerodrome operators and surveyors for aerodromes. A proper system (PLX) to supply AIP relevant data is already in place, even for external originators.

30/06/2017

REG (By:06/2017)

ongoing according to project plan, but REG 02 for 07/2013 is late: Working groups already established for all parties concerned. Draft ADQ Compliance Check List for originators and other involved parties (e.g. main airports) in place. This ADQ compliance check list should be seen as generic formal arrangement, to be approved by the NSA.

Late

30/06/2017

ASP (By:06/2017)

The data quality project, led by ACG/AIM, is running according to the project plan. Several awareness workshop were held by ACG to find proper ways to comply with ADQ together with NSA, provincial governments (en route obstacles), aerodrome operators and surveyors for aerodromes.

A draft formal arrangement has already been issued by Austro Control to be signed by the originators.

A proper system (PLX) to supply AIP relevant data is already in place, even for external originators.

For the military, ongoing according to project plan.

Late

30/06/2017

APO (By:06/2017) ongoing according to project plan

Late

30/06/2017

ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 06/02/2009 New aircraft capability: 31/12/2010 ATS unit operational capability ‐ Regulation (EC) 29/2009, Annex I, Part A: 06/02/2013 Retrofit aircraft capability: 04/02/2015

[IDP]

Completed

CPDLC operation has been put into service for the FIR Vienna above FL 285 since 17 October 2014 (AIRAC Cycle 1311).

17/10/2014

REG (By:02/2016)


Completed

17/10/2014

ASP (By:02/2016)


Air Ground Data Link

Completed

17/10/2014

MIL (By:01/2014)

Military committed to implement the objective by the SES target date . Present transport type aircraft remain outside applicability area (below FL285)

Not Applicable

‐


ITY‐AGVCS2

Implement air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195

Timescales:

Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

Planned

Conversion is partly completed, required notifications to the commission have been, respectively will be transmitted in time. Requirements for the remaining stakeholders will be fulfilled in time.

31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Conversion is partly completed, required notifications to the commission have been, respectively will be transmitted by end 2015

Late

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

Conversion at ANSP level completed. For safety reasons, frequencies assigned to ATIS and Volmet will be converted to 8,33 kHz channel spacing as of 31st December 2018.

8,33 FRQ channel spacing below FL195

Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2020)

8,33 conversions will take place by 12/2017 according to the national MIL conversion plan. State aircraft / MIL carrier aircraft are already equipped to a major part.

Planned

31/12/2018

APO (By:12/2018)

The national Frequency plan does foresee the required FRQ assignments and conversions for VIE plus relevant procedures.

Planned

31/12/2018

ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012 : 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL 285 in the airspace in Annex I, Part A of Regulation (EC) 29/2009: 06/02/2013

Completed

The main functionalities as required for coordination and transfer have been implemented in the current ATM system (TopSky). LOF / NAN messages for AGDL implementation were implemented in Oct 2014.

17/10/2014

ASP (By:02/2016)

The main functionalities for coordination and transfer are already implemented in the current ATM system. Enhanced functions are part of the new ATM System (NG AATMS) and were implemented in October 2014.

ATM system and Sub‐System evolution for COTR

Completed

17/10/2014

MIL (By:12/2012) The Military are exchanging BFD and CFD data with the civil ATM system

Not Applicable

31/12/1995


ITY‐FMTP

Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)

Timescales:

Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

[IDP]

Completed

With regard to Regulation (EC) No 633/2007, the verification activities and the assessment of verification of systems (DoV) and the technical file (TF) was positively performed. Local system implementation is finished. First FMTP operation with MUN since 04/2011. Majority of partners has been connected applying FMTP. Remaining partners are planned to be updated by end of 2014.

31/08/2013

ASP (By:12/2014)

Local and national system implementation is completed. First FMTP operation with MUN since 04/2011 PRA since 10/2012. BRA since 05/2014, BUD since 02/2014, ZAG since 09/2013, LJU and PAD planned by end of 2014 ZUR planned by mid 2015

FMTP Implementation

Completed

31/08/2013

MIL (By:12/2014) Finalised 04/2011 with the common use of the ATM System

Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability

Timescales:

Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

Planned

Safety assessments for changes and new SUR systems are continuously monitored and audited by NSA. Formal acceptance is communicated to the ANSP. SUR data transfer is based on ASTERIX format since the year 2000, and safety assessments for existing and newly implemented SUR infrastructure and therelevant training is applied according to regulations. The overall SUR chain related Safety assessment is subject to further elaboration until 02/2015. Dependent on the MIL planning and budget, aircraft fleet and the specific carriage and operation of Mode S Enhanced Surveillance and ADS‐B Out avionics, will be implemented by 12/2019

31/12/2019

REG (By:02/2015)

Safety assessments for changes and new SUR systems are continuously monitored and audited by NSA and formal acceptance comminicated to the ANSP.

Completed

31/10/2012

ASP (By:02/2015)

SUR data transfer is based on ASTERIX format since the year 2000. Safety assessments for existing and newly implemented SUR infrastructure and therelevant training is applied according to regulations. According to the Safety assessment process and derived procedures, all changes referring to the surveillance infrastructure have been subject to SA's and were delivered to the NSA. The overall SUR chain related Safety assessment has been subject to all safety assessments in question.

Completed

31/03/2014

MIL (By:06/2020)

partly completed ‐ full Mode S compatible implementation covering the fleet update is foreseen by 12/2019.

Planned

31/12/2019


NAV03

Implementation of P‐RNAV

Timescales:


Completed

As far as RNAV applications are concerned, Austria is fully compliant with ICAO implementation plans, including the advanced ability of RNP 'AR' procedures

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2012)

As far as RNAV applications are concerned, Austria is fully compliant with ICAO implementation plans, including the advanced ability of RNP 'AR' procedures

Completed

31/12/2010

NAV10

Implement APV procedures

Timescales:


[IDP]

Completed

In accordance with the ICAO assembly resolution 37, currently there are APV/Baro procedures published in AIP for Vienna, Innsbruck, Salzburg and Graz. APV/SBAS procedures for Linz and Graz have been published in 2013.

31/12/2013

REG (By:04/2016) AMCs are generally not converted into national regulations.

Completed

31/12/2010

ASP (By:12/2016)

In accordance with the ICAO assembly resolution 37, currently there are APV/Baro procedures published in AIP for Vienna, Innsbruck, Salzburg and Graz. APV/SBAS procedures for Linz and Graz have been published in 2013.

Completed

31/12/2013

SAF10

Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

Timescales:


Completed

Based on initially arranged documentations, a series of workshops has been held in 2010. Additional specific workshops together with flight training organizations, aviation agency and the aero club had been held in 2011 and results were presented to the NSA in the beginning of 2012. Derived from the European Action Plan the national action plan has been elaborated and finalized. All relevant stakeholders have approved the plan under the authority of the NSA.

31/12/2012

REG (By:12/2011)

Based on initially arranged documentations, a series of workshops has been held in 2010 and additional specific workshops together with flight training organisations, aviation agency and the aero club are regularly executed. Derived from the European Action Plan the national action plan has been elaborated and finalized. All relevant stakeholders have approved the plan and the actions have been completed.

Completed

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2011)

Based on initially arranged documentations, a series of workshops has been held in 2010. Additional specific workshops together with flight training organizations, aviation agency and the aero club had been held in 2011 and results were presented to the NSA in the beginning of 2012. Derived from the European Action Plan the national action plan has been elaborated and finalized. All relevant stakeholders have approved the plan under the authority of the NSA.

Completed

31/12/2012

MIL (By:12/2011)

The locally planned necessary actions have been implemented by end 2012

Completed

31/12/2012


SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

Timescales:


Planned

Required measures in terms of dissemination of documents, oversight activities and implementation reporting are planned according to the regulator SloA. The remaining stakeholders have completed their tasks.

31/12/2017

REG (By:01/2018)

The required measures in terms of dissemination of documents, oversight activities and implementation reporting are planned by the relevant ministerial section.

Planned

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2014)

Local RWY Safety Team for Vienna established; regular meetings are held 4 times per year at senior operational and managerial level between ATC, airport and main airlines to tackle operational issues (ATC OPS meeting) All relevant recommendations are fulfilled.

Completed

31/12/2013

APO (By:12/2014)

Local RWY Safety Team for Vienna established; regular meetings are held 4 times per year at senior operational and managerial level between ATC, airport and main airlines to tackle operational issues (ATC OPS meeting) All relevant recommendations are fulfilled.

Completed

31/12/2013


6.2 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress

Note that the above picture is based on the Preliminary Deployment Programme V0, published in December 2014 by the Deployment Manager. The full Deployment Programme is foreseen by end June 2015.


Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Point for Austria Austro Control Martin STIEBER

LSSIP Focal Point for Austro Control Austro Control Martin STIEBER

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA BMVIT Alfred GULDER

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Vienna Airport VIE Franz EHMOSER

LSSIP Contact Person for AUSTRIA EUROCONTROL Agnieszka DYBOWSKA

ESSIP Objective Implementation

ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI (E. REUBER till 02/2015)

A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER

AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Ralph MICHALKE

AOM21 R. BUCUROIU A. DYBOWSKA Kristian WOLLNER

AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER

AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER

AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Bernhard SÖLLNER

AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Roland SCHMIDT

ATC02.2 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Robert BACH




ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Robert BACH

ATC12 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Robert BACH

ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Robert BACH

ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL’ORTO Robert BACH

ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Robert BACH

COM09 L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Norbert BACHMAYER

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Gerhard BERGER

COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Peter PRAVITS

ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL Daniel SCHAAD

ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL Christian WOBORSKY

FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE

FCM03 S. SMIDT O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE

FCM04 M. RICHARD O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE

FCM05 P. MATERN O. CIOARA Ralph MICHALKE

INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Joachim BRUJA

INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Joachim BRUJA


ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist(s)

ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Reinhard WALCHER

ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Robert WEHOFER

ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA Michael LÖFFLER

ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET O. ALFARO Peter PRAVITS

ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Robert BACH

ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Peter PRAVITS

ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Herbert SCHRANZ

NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Daniel SCHAAD

NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Daniel SCHAAD

SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Alfred VLASEK

SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Alfred VLASEK

SRC-RLMK M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA Alfred GULDER / NSA

SRC-SLRD M. DEBOECK A. DYBOWSKA Alfred GULDER / NSA


Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts

NSA:

http://www.bmvit.gv.at/ministerium/organisation/index.html


Austro Control:


Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations Note: The meaning of some abbreviations (i.e. FAP, ANS, MS, ORD and SIS) is valid only for purpose of this document and does not correspond with the ICAO 8400 Doc. A-ATMS Austrian ATM system ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System ACC Area Control Centre ACG Austro Control GmbH AF ATM Functionality AFTN Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunication Network AIS Aeronautical Information Services AMAN Arrival Management AMC Airspace Management Cell ANS Air Navigation Services AOP Airport Operations (domain) APP Approach Control Service APW Area Proximity Warning ARN ATS Route Network ARTAS Advanced Radar Tracker and Server ASM Airspace Management A-SMGCS Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System ASP ATS Provider ATC Air Traffic Control ATCO Air Traffic Control Officer ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management ATM Air Traffic Management ATN Aeronautical Telecommunication Network ATS Air Traffic Services bmvit Austrian: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie (MoTIT) CEO Chief Executive Officer CFMU Central Flow Management Unit (replaced by -> NMOC) CNS Communication, Navigation and Surveillance COM Communications (domain) CP Contact Person CTR Control Zone EAD European AIS Data Base EATM European Air Traffic Management Programme EC European Commission ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference ESSIP European Single Sky and ImPlementation ENV Environment EU European Union EUR ICAO European Region FAB CE Functional Airspace Block Central Europe (AT, BiH, CZ, HR, HU, SI, SK) FCM Flow and Capacity Management (domain) FIR Flight Information Region FL Flight Level FMP Flow Management Position FT Fast Track FUA Flexible Use of Airspace (concept) GAT General Air Traffic GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System HUM Human Resources (domain) IATA International Air Transport Association ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation ILS Instrument Landing System JAA Joint Aviation Authorities LAU Local Approach Unit LSSIP Local Single Sky and ImPlementation LoA Letter of Agreement


MET Meteorology MIL Military MoD Ministry of Defence MS Member State MTCD Medium Term Conflict Detection MoTIT Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology NAV Navigation (domain) NG AATMS New Generation Austrian ATM System NMOC Network Management Operation Cell NSA National Supervisory Authority NSP Network Strategic Plan OAT Operational Air Traffic OLDI On Line Data Interchange OPS Operations OR Operational Requirements ORD Operational Requirements Document PC Provisional Council PCP Pilot Common Project PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme PRC Performance Review Commission PRB Performance Review Board R&D Research and Development RNAV Area Navigation RVR Runway Visual Range RVSM Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum SAF Safety (domain) S-AF Sub ATM Functionality SLoA Stakeholder Line of Action SMGCS Surface Movement Guidance and Control System SMS Safety Management System SRU Safety Regulation Unit STATFOR EUROCONTROL Statistics and Forecast (Specialist Panel on Air Traffic Statistics and Forecast) STCA Short Term Conflict Alert SUR Surveillance (domain) SYSCO System Supported Co-ordination TACT Tactical Flow Management tbd to be defined TCAS Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System TF Task Force TMA Terminal Control Area TOPSKY Austrian ATM system provided by Thales ToR Terms of Reference UAC Upper Area Control /Centre UIR Upper flight Information Region


Annex D – Airspace Classification Austrian FIR

To see recent details, open the following www-link and refer to Part II – ENR 1.4:

http://eaip.austrocontrol.at/index_new.php

Date post:	04-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	phunghanh
View:	223 times
Download:	0 times