Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ESTONIA · The geographical scope of this document...

Year 2016 - Level 1

EUROCONTROL

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) ESTONIA

LSSIP Year 2016 Estonia Released Issue

Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Estonia

Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/112

Date of Edition 24/03/2017

LSSIP Focal Point Viktor Popov - [email protected]

LSSIP Contact Person Luca Dell’ Orto - [email protected]

Status Released

Intended for Agency Stakeholders

Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Reference Documents

LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip

Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2016

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-plan

Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2015

http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european-atm-master-plan-level-3-implementation-report

European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/

STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor

Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries

National AIP https://aim.eans.ee/

FAB Performance Plan http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/ses-performance-scheme-reference-period-2-2015-2019


APPROVAL SHEET

The following authority(ies) have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2016 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2016 (also known as the ESSIP Plan).


CONTENTS

Chapter 1 National ATM Environment ...................................................................... 5 1.1. Geographical Scope ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. International Membership ............................................................................................. 5 1.1.2. Geographical description of the FIR(s) ......................................................................... 5 1.1.3. Airspace Classification and Organisation ..................................................................... 6 1.2. National Stakeholders .................................................................................................. 7 1.2.1. Civil Regulator(s) .......................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2. Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS - EANS .............................................................................. 9 1.2.3. Airports ....................................................................................................................... 11 1.2.4. Military Authorithies .................................................................................................... 11

Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................... 14 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Estonia ...................................................................................... 14 2.2. TALLIN ACC .............................................................................................................. 15 2.2.1. Traffic and en-route ATFM delays .............................................................................. 15 2.2.2. Performance summer 2016 ........................................................................................ 15 2.2.3. Planning Period 2017-2021 ........................................................................................ 16

Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations ........... 18

Chapter 4 National Projects .................................................................................... 19

Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination .......................................................................... 21 5.1. FAB Co-ordination ...................................................................................................... 21 5.2. FAB Projects .............................................................................................................. 23 5.3. Regional cooperation ................................................................................................. 24 5.4. Regional Projects ....................................................................................................... 25

Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress ..................................................... 27 6.1. State View .................................................................................................................. 27 6.1.1. Overall Objective Implementation ............................................................................... 27 6.1.2. Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ............................................................. 28 6.1.3. ICAO ASBU Implementation ...................................................................................... 32 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ............................................................ 33 6.3. Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ....................................................... 44

Annexes

LSSIP Year 2016 Estonia 1 Released Issue

13; 35%

6; 16%

8; 22%

8; 22%

2; 5%Completed Ongoing

Planned Late

No Plan Not Applicable

Missing Data Undefined

Executive Summary

National ATM Context

For the year 2015 GDP increased by 1,1% comparing with the 2014. The forecast for 2016 is 1,3%, for 2017 is 2,5%.

Northern European Functional Airspace Block (NEFAB) Free Route Airspace (FRA) Phase II was implemented on 23d of June 2016. On time!

PBN Implementation plan is still under development. GNSS RNP APCH and LPV are being developed for Kuressaare aerodrome.

Migration from AFTN to AMHS project was finalised in the year 2016.

Tallinn aerodrome traffic area expansion is started in 2016 and progressing according to the plan. Due to the modernisation works, A-CDM and SBAS APV procedures implementation at Tallinn aerodrome has been postponed to 2018.

DLS service implementation will continue in 2017 and planned to be finalised in 2018 on time.

Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in Estonia increased by 2.5% during Summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to Summer 2015.

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.6% and 5.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.6%.

Implementation Objectives Overview

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

A-CDM is late in implementing objective(s) AOP05 – which is/are planned to be completed by end of 2015 due to modernisation works at Tallinn aerodrome. Preliminary, the implementation of A-CDM planned for the year 2018. The implementation will be further discussed at a later stage.

The implementation of SBAS LPV procedures (NAV10) at Kuressaare aerodrome is planned in 2017. Tallinn aerodrome will be next. The implementation is planned for 2018.

The objectives ATC02.5 and ATC02.7 will be completed with the new ATM system upgrade which is planned for 2016.


The objective SAF11 is currently in the planning stage and is envisaged to be completed by 2018.

Migration from AFTN to AMHS, objective COM10, was performed in 2015. Certification is underway. The conformity of AMHS systems and associated procedures will be ensured by end of June 2016. The implementation of VoIP in ATM, objective COM11, is planned for 2020.

ITY-AGDL – Initial ATC air-ground data link services implementation continuation will start in January 2017 and planned to be finalised on time February, 5 2018.

ITY-AGVCS2 - 8,33 kHz air-ground voice channel spacing implementation below FL195 will start next year and will be finalised by the end of 2018.

Progress per SESAR Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives – AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 – are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.

The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011-2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.

SESAR Baseline Implementation

2010 2019

64%

PCP Implementation

2015 2023

27%


Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase

The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.

ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation

The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Block 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 6.1.3.

Block 0 2010 2018

78%

n/a

47% 70% 67% 68%

0%

63%

Optimised ATM Network Services

Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing

Airport Operations

14%

Enabling Aviation Infrastructure


Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years.

Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;

Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;

Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;

Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter;

Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;

Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high-level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.

Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016.

The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.


Chapter 1 National ATM Environment

1.1. Geographical Scope

1.1.1. International Membership

Estonia is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 1995

EUROCONTROL 1 January 2015

European Union 1 May 2004

EASA 1 May 2004

ICAO 24 January 1992

NATO 1 April 2004

ITU 22 April 1992

1.1.2. Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses the Estonia ‘Tallinn Flight Information Region’ FIR:

Estonia’s FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Finland FIR and Helsinki TMA to the North, St. Petersburg FIR to the East, Riga FIR/TMA to the South and Malmö/Stockholm FIR-s to the West.

St. Petersburg belongs to the Russian Federation, a non- ECAC State.

The Control Area (CTA) covers the geographical limits of the Tallinn FIR from FL 95 up to FL 660. Control Zones (CTR-s) are implemented around 3 airports, namely Tallinn, Tartu and Ämari (Military). In addition Kärdla and Kuressaare AFIS.


1.1.3. Airspace Classification and Organisation


FIR: GND - UNL

CTA: FL 95 - FL 660

In accordance with national regulations only the Imperial System is used in Estonia.

1.2. National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Estonia are the following:

- The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MoEA&C);

- The Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (ECAA);

- Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS (Estonian ANS or EANS);

- Ministry of Defence;

- Estonian Defence Forces Air Force

- Tallinn Airport Ltd.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.

Government

Ministry of EconomicAffairs and

CommunicationsMinistry of Defence

Air ForceCivil Aviation

Administration

Tallinn Airport Ltd. EANS


1.2.1. Civil Regulator(s)

General Information

Civil Aviation in Estonia is the responsibility of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.

The ECAA is further detailed in the following sections.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications

Statutes of Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications

(Regulation of Government of the Republic of Estonia no. 323 of 23 October 2002)

Safety Oversight Estonia Civil Aviation Administration (ECAA)

Aviation Act

Statutes of Estonian Civil Aviation Administration

(Regulation of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications No 73 of 31. July 2006

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

ECAA Aviation Act



Airspace ECAA Aviation Act



Economic MoEA&C Statutes of Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications

(Regulation of Government of the Republic of Estonia no. 323 of 23 October 2002)

Environment Ministry of Environment Statutes of Ministry of Environment

(Regulation of Government of the Republic of Estonia no. 19 of 10 December 2009)

Security ECAA Aviation Act


(Regulation of the Minister of Economic Affairs and Communications No 73 of 31. July 2006)

Accident investigation Estonian Safety Investigation Bureau (ESIB)

Aviation Act


Estonian CAA

The Estonian Civil Aviation Administration (CAA or ECAA) is in the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications and it is the Estonian Safety Supervisory Authority, responsible for exercising state supervision over the compliance with the requirements deriving from legal acts regulating the field of activity of ECAA. It has enforcement powers and it is the extra-judicial body which conducts proceedings in matters of misdemeanours, ECAA participates in the drafting of legal acts concerning its area of activities, makes proposals on the amendments of those legal acts, such as the improvement of Estonian-language aviation terminology, participates in the development of policies, strategies, development plans, prepares and implements projects in its area of activities, including international projects. CAA is institutionally separated from the Estonian Service Providers.

Annual Report published: Y Annual Safety Oversight report 2015

The ECAA web-sites is: http://www.ecaa.ee/

Reference to organisation chart in annex B.

1.2.2. Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS - EANS

Service provided

The Estonian ANS, Lennuliiklusteeninduse AS (EANS), is a state owned stock company and a main service provider in Tallinn FIR, at Tartu and Tallinn Airports. The Air Traffic Services units of domestic airports provide service in defined portions of terminal airspace and belong to the airport enterprises.

The functions of EANS are:

Provision of airspace utilisation; Provision of Air Traffic Service; Publication, exchange and dissemination of Aeronautical Information - Aeronautical Information

Services; Consultancy Services and expertise in the field of aviation.


Name of the ANSP: EANS

Governance: MoEA&C Ownership: 100% State (MoEA&C)

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y

ATC approach Y

ATC Airport(s) Y Currently Tallinn and Tartu Airports. There is a plan to provide services also at other domestic airports.

AIS Y

CNS Y

MET N Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (EMHI).

ATCO training Y EANS provides OJT and complementary training.

Others

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

N

Annual Report published: Y http://www.eans.ee/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Annual-Report-2014-

final.pdf This is the annual report covering yearly activities of the ANSP.

Further information is available on the EANS web-sites: http://www.eans.ee

The organisation chart is available in annex B.

ATC systems in use

Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 N

FDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? Planned 2016

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Software upgrade

ATC Unit ACC/APP

SDPS

Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales

Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? Planned 2016

Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Software upgrade

ATC Unit ACC/APP

1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))


ATC Units

The ATC units in the Estonian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:

ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks

En-route TMA

TALLINN ATCC 2 1 Tallinn UTA (Class C)+ CTA (Class C)

+ 1 Feeder sector suite operational regularly (EUROCAT 2000) as from Nov 2005

Tallinn APP 1 Tallinn TMA Collocated with Tallinn ACC

Tartu APP 1 Tartu TMA

1.2.3. Airports

General information

APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITY-ADQ and SAF11.

Referring to the List of Airports in Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

The airport which is covered in this LSSIP is Tallinn Airport.

The main airports in Estonia, including Tallinn, are operated by Tallinn Airport Ltd.

Tallinn Airport is the main international airport of Estonia. It is a 100% State owned stock company under the supervision of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. It was established with the assets of RE Eesti Lennujaamad (State Enterprise Estonian Airports). Tallinn Airport was entered in the Estonian Commercial Register on 31 December 1997.

Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan – Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.

The airport covered in this LSSIP is Tallinn airport.

APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITY-ADQ and SAF11.

1.2.4. Military Authorithies

The Military Authorities in Estonia concerned with ATM are:

- Ministry of Defence;

- Defence Forces Air Force Staff;

- Ämari Airbase.


Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.

Estonian Defence Forces Air Force Staff is responsible for the safety, monitoring of military aviation tasks and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management.

Ämari Airbase is responsible for air navigation service at Ämari military airfield and within Ämari control zone.

Co-ordination between civil air navigation service providers and the military authorities is ensured through Letters of Agreements (LoAs).

Further information is available on the Estonian Defence Forces web-site: http://www.mil.ee

Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

Oversight

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

N Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

Y

Level of such legal provision: NA Level of such legal provision: Ministry of Defence, CAA

Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence

Authority signing such legal provision: Ministery of Defence

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT NA

Organisation of military ATS for OAT NA Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y

OAT/GAT Coordination NA OAT/GAT Coordination Y

ATCO Training NA ATCO Training Y

ATCO Licensing NA ATCO Licensing Y

ANSP Certification NA ANSP Certification Y

ANSP Supervision NA ANSP Supervision Y

Aircrew Training NA ESARR applicability NA

Aircrew Licensing NA

Additional Information: Military apply civil rules Additional Information:-

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP NA National AIP Y

National Military AIP NA National Military AIP NA

EUROCONTROL eAIP NA EUROCONTROL eAIP NA

Other: Other:

OAT GAT

OAT GAT

National oversight body for OAT: None NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military is CAA.

Additional information: ECAA is responsible for the certification for GAT.


Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

Y If YES, since: 01.05.2016 Duration of the Certificate:

1 year

Certificate issued by: ECAA If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

NA

Additional Information: Military provides service to GAT in Ämari CTR.

User role

Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route N En-Route Military fly GAT, the service is provided by EANS

En-Route N

Approach/TMA N EANS Approach/TMA N

Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y

AIS Y AIS N

MET Y MET Y

SAR Y SAR Y

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y

Other: Other:

Additional Information: Additional Information:

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only N GAT only Y Both OAT and GAT N

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control

Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Y Exemption from Route Charges N

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N

CNS exemptions: RVSM N 8.33 N Mode S N ACAS N

Others: Provision of ATC in UHF available only by Ämari TWR.

Military in Estonia applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y

FUA Level 1 implemented: Y




Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity

2.1. Evolution of traffic in Estonia

2016 Traffic in Estonia increased by 2.5% during Summer 2016 (May to October), when compared to Summer 2015.

2017-2021

The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.6% and 5.0% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 2.6%.

0

50.000

100.000

150.000

200.000

250.000

300.000

2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F

IFR

flig

hts

Estonia - Annual IFR Movements

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast

2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 FH 4,8% 4,6% 5,4% 4,8% 5,5% 4,7% 4,7%B -3,1% 4,6% 1,2% 4,3% 2,3% 2,6% 2,6% 2,8% 2,5% 2,8%L 3,9% 0,1% 0,2% 0,9% 1,0% 0,6% 0,9%

ECAC B -1,1% 1,7% 1,6% 2,7% 1,4% 2,1% 2,1% 2,4% 1,9% 2,1%

EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2016)IFR flights yearly growth

Estonia


2.2. TALLIN ACC

2.2.1. Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

2.2.2. Performance summer 2016

Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer

Capacity gap Ref value Actual

+2.5 % 63 (0%) 0.04 0.04 No

The average en‐route delay per flight increased from 0.02 minutes per flight in Summer 2015 to 0.04 minutes per flight in Summer 2016.

100% of the delays were for the reason ATC capacity.

Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments

NEFRA Yes

SYSCO –full OLDI with Latvia, Sweden No Postponed to 2017/2018

LARA implementation Yes

Additional staff and controller rating Yes

Adaptation of sector opening times Yes

Adding new routes crossing the boundary with Sankt‐Petersburg FIR Yes

Maximum configuration: 3 (+1 FEEDER) No 2 sectors opened

Summer 2016 performance assessment

The capacity baseline was estimated to be 63. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 59 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 50.

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Peak Day Traffic 632 621 651 649 674

Summer Traffic 544 537 567 569 583

Yearly Traffic 493 485 508 516 542

Summer Traffic Forecast 583 597 611 626 650

High Traffic Forecast - Summer 592 627 658 700 730

Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 578 582 586 585 590

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.09 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.04

Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.11 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.03

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

En

rout

e D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

per

flig

ht)

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rage

)

EETTACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

*From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/2016


2.2.3. Planning Period 2017-2021

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

Capacity Plan

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Free Route Airspace

Airspace Management Advanced FUA

Airport & TMA Network Integration

Cooperative Traffic Management

Airspace Cross‐border sectorisation Estonia,

Finland, Latvia (NEFAB)

Procedures SYSCO OLDI with Latvia, Sweden

DLK/CPDLC

Staffing Additional staff and controller

rating

Technical

Capacity

Adaptation of sector opening times

Significant Events

Max sectors 2 to 3

(+1 FEEDER) 3

(+1 FEEDER) 3

(+1 FEEDER) 3

(+1 FEEDER) 3

(+1 FEEDER)

Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile Annual % Increase 3% 3% 3% N/A N/A

Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile

Sufficient capacity to meet demand N/A N/A

Annual Reference Value (min) 0.03 0.03 0.03 N/A N/A

Summer reference value (min) 0.04 0.04 0.04 N/A N/A

Additional information

The opening scheme will be flexibly adapted to the traffic demand and might go up to 3 sectors if needed in Summer 2017.

H 70 11% 73 4% 77 5%

Ref. 65 3% 67 3% 69 3%

L 63 0% 63 0% 64 2%

Open 65 3% 67 3% 69 3%

C/R 65 3% 67 3% 69 3%

ACC2016

baseline 2017 2018 2019

Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)Capacity Profiles

EETT 63


0

1

2

3

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2017 ‐WD

0

1

2

3

00:00

02:00

04:00

06:00

08:00

10:00

12:00

14:00

16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

Sectors available ‐ Summer 2017 ‐WE

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2017‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 65 67 69

Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 65 67 69

Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 65 67 69

Capacity Profile ‐ High 70 73 77

Capacity Profile ‐ Low 63 63 64

Capacity Baseline 63 63

2017 ‐ 2021 Plan 70 73 77 77 77

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Cap

acity profile (movements per hour)

EETTCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

2017‐2021 Planning Period Outlook

To ensure the required delivery of capacity in the medium‐term, Estonian ANS is reviewing: creation and deployment of an additional sector in 2017; implementation of additional OLDI functions with adjacent FIRs; organising cross‐border sectorisation within NEFAB airspace; implementation of the DLK/CPDLC.


Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations

Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Estonia for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.

Reference

number Recommendation 2015 Ownership

REC-2015/1

Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of pre-SESAR elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline.

All operational stakeholders

Corrective actions taken: YES Description: EANS implements new ATM functionalities of the SESAR Deployment Programme within the limits of its capacity. Timely implementation of some of the functionalities depends on readiness of NM systems.

REC-2015/2

Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, ITY-ADQ, ITY-FMTP, INF07, COM10 to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased.

Local Stakeholders

Corrective actions taken: YES Description: AOM19: ATC07.1: Not applicable ATC15: AOP04.1: Completed ITY-ADQ: Planned 2017 ITY-FMTP: INF07: Planned 2018 COM10: Completed ENV01: Monitoring of performance and reporting is not established yet. Tallinn Airport Ltd is in charge for this. The work is under progress. EANS has also purchased a tool for monitoring. FCM04: This objective is not valid anymore SAF10: The actions from European Action plan for ANSPs were evaluated by EANS and necessary measures were implemented for reducing the risk of incidents caused by air-ground communications deficiencies. ECAA has verified that EANS and national airlines comply with the respective measures of the European Action Plan- Airspace Infringement Risk Reduction.

REC-2015/7

ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision.

ANSPs benefiting from EU funding

Corrective actions taken: YES Description: EANS is using PCP funding opportunities for achieving full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision.


Chapter 4 National Projects

3d ACC Sector Implementation

Organisation(s): EANS (EE) Type of project: National

Schedule: Implementation planned for 2018

Status: Definition phase completed

Description: Introduction of 3d Sector of Area Control Centre

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: FCM01

Other links: -

Project included in RP2 Performance Plan:

- Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:

-

Project included in DP2016:

- Name/Code in DP2016: -

Performance contribution

Safety: Y

Environment: -

Capacity: Y

Cost-efficiency: -

Operational efficiency: -

Air-ground data link implementation

Organisation(s): EANS (EE) Type of project: National

Schedule: Delayed until Feb 2018.

Status: Common specification was conducted within Borealis, however, procurement is individual activity

Description: Entities providing communication services shall ensure that the ground communication systems and their constituents apply air-ground communications for CM and CPDLC data exchanges in compliance with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No. 29/2009, allowing either ATN/VDL-2 or an alternative communication technology

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: ITY-AGDL

Other links: Commission (EU) Regulation 2015/310



-




Safety: Enhancement through the delivery of standard and unambiguous messages, the provision of a communications back up and the possibility of immediate message retrieval.

Environment: -

Capacity: Increased capacity through both reduction of voice congestion and increase in controller efficiency.

Cost-efficiency: Data link is a cost-effective capacity increase enabler through sector productivity increase and delay cost savings.



EETN traffic area expansion

Organisation(s): EANS (EE), TALLINN AIRPORT Ltd. (EE) Type of project: National

Schedule: Start date is 2016 and end date is end of 2017

Status: Delayed.

Description: Expansion of EETN airport traffic area to increase capacity. Upgrade of Tallinn aerodrome runway to CAT II.

Link and references

ATM MP links: -

Other links: -



-




Safety: -

Environment: y

Capacity: y

Cost-efficiency: -


Tallinn Airport A-CDM implementation project

Organisation(s): EANS (EE), TALLINN AIRPORT Ltd. (EE) Type of project: National

Schedule: -

Status: Delayed. The start of the work will be discussed at a later stage not earlier 2018

Description: A-CDM establishment and its integration with NM

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOP05

Other links: -



-




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: y

Cost-efficiency: y



Chapter 5 Regional Co-ordination

5.1. FAB Co-ordination


* EUROCONTROL has issued "IFPS Users’ Manual - Edition 20.1 Date 22/11/2016" containing AFP-related changes. ANSPs have to test the part of AFP functioning in FRA environment.

Advanced Air Traffic Services

High Performing Airport Operations

All NEFAB ANSPs will implement automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM by end of 2017

All NEFAB ANSPs have nearly implemented the COTR (Avinor missing ASP08 & ASP09 due to ongoing system upgrade). Latvia has completed ITY-COTR.

The automatic exchange of the AFP messages will be implemented by the end of 2017 in all NEFAB ANSPs. Latvia has implemented the automatic exchange of AFP messages.

The implementation deadline for FRA traffic will be specified. *

Joint FAB project: NEFAB Free Route Airspace across the FAB above FL135 in Norway and above FL95 in Finland, Estonia and Latvia. Airspace scenarios and simulations were supported by EUROCONTROL.

Basic AMAN implemented for major airports in Norway and Finland. Latvia plans to implement Basic AMAN in RIX within 2017.

PRNAV almost fully implemented, LGS partly. LGS plans to implement RNAV procedures by end 2018.

All main airports have implemented A-SMGCS level 1 and level 2; at Helsinki level 2 will become operational during 2017.

Airports CDM implemented fully by Helsinki and Oslo airports; others follow in line with the FOC.

DPI messages exchanged between Network Manager and both Helsinki and Oslo Airport.


Enabling Aviation Infrastructure

NEFAB Safety KPIs SMI of 95% and RI of 95% were achieved. Level of Effectiveness of Safety management was Level C for EANS, Finavia and LGS, and D for Avinor. Present level will be maintained as minimum but efforts will be addressed to minimize number of incidents.

The en-route ATFM delay in NEFAB in 2016 was 0.07 min per flight which meets the FAB-wide KPI (0.12). The performance at national levels varied from 0.0 to 0.11. Capacity is presently sufficient and ATM systems are developed with regard to the growing capacity demand.

Cost efficiency will be improved along with the developments of the Operational Efficiency programs.

ANSPs are committed to protect their organisations and systems from cyber threats.

NEFAB Free Route Airspace implemented in NEFAB States in November 2015 is connected with the FRA in DK/SE FAB. Most enhancements to enable seamless cross-border FRA operations between both FABs were implemented in June 2016 and will be finalised in May 2017. The area is being further expanded in the Borealis FRA programme through establishing interfaces with FRA areas in UK/Ireland FAB and Iceland. This will be perceived by airspace users as continuous FRA area across nine states maximising the benefits for customers.

In NEFAB airspace airlines can select between the fixed route network and free route operations. The NEFAB Free Route Airspace enables users to flight-plan and fly user-preferred trajectories. NEFAB Horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) in 2016 was 1.73%. The Union target requires inefficiencies in actual trajectories decrease to 2.60% by 2019.

All 4 ANSPs have technical readiness to replace X.25 with TCP/IP.

Due to institutional and technical reasons AGDL implementation is late for all ANSPs.

Estonia, Norway and Latvia implemented FMTP provisions; Finland plans FMTP to become operational during 2017.

Latvia, Norway and Finland are PENS users.

Estonia and Latvia moved from AFTN to AMHS (COM 10), Finland implemented basic AMHS in October 2016.


5.2. FAB Projects

NEFAB FRA

Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV)

Type of project: FAB

Schedule: Target date: December 31, 2017

Status: Ongoing, on-time.

Description: Implementation of unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and implementation of FRA compliant procedures in Bodø Oceanic. Implementation of seamless FRA interface with Norway was postponed due to technical upgrade delay in Avinor ATM system Revised solution of unrestricted FRA between Finland, Estonia and Latvia, and state-wide FRA in Norway were implemented in November 2015. FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017.Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.2 L2: AOM-0500

Other links: Nill


N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:

N/A


Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_227_AF3


Safety: Safety levels remain unchanged

Environment: ++ Enables fly shorter routes and save time and fuel burn

Capacity: Present capacity

Cost-efficiency: + For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency

Operational efficiency: ++ Optimised horizontal flight profiles

Cooperation Activities: -


NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8)

Organisation(s): AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV)

Type of project: FAB

Schedule: Seamless FRA interface between Norway and NEFAB East/DK-SE FAB will be implemented in May 2017. FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017. Flight planning shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030.

Status: Ongoing

Description: Implementation of Scenario 8 i.e. unrestricted and seamless FRA interface with DK/SE FAB; implementation of FRA in Bodø Oceanic.

Link and references

ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.2

Other links: -



-


Y Name/Code in DP2016: AF - 3.2.4


Safety: Present or improved safety

Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users

Capacity: Present or additional capacity

Cost-efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency


Cooperation Activities: Harmonisation of flight planning rules, ASM, AIP publication, ATM system upgrades to comply with common ORs and IFPS integration.

5.3. Regional cooperation

Regional Cooperation Initiatives

North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) programme

NEFAB is closely cooperating with DK SE FAB within an agreed concept to implement a continuous and seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs (North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme). The NEFRA concept is implementation of seamless interface in Scenario 8 between the two FABs above FL285 (Danish-Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015 the first milestone of NEFRA Phase 1 (Scenario 6) was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. First step of Scenario 8 was implemented in June 2016 with seamless cross-border FRA operations between NEFAB East (Estonia, Finland, Latvia) and DK-SE FAB. Seamless FRA interface with Norway will be finalised in May 2017 allowing unrestricted FRA operation across the borders of all six states in both FABs.

Borealis Alliance

The Borealis Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) is a legal document that sets up a framework for the business co-operation between 9 European ANSPs LFV (Sweden), Finavia (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure.


In 2015 Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme to create a multi-FAB FRA by establishing interfaces between FRA areas in 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one continuous FRA to our customers (airspace users).

5.4. Regional Projects

Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) (2015_227_AF3_A; 2015_227_AF3_B)

Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)

Type of project: Regional

Schedule: 15/02/2016 - 31/12/2020

Status: -

Description: Project Objective: - Implementing FRA, which is a key element of ATM Functionality (AF3) - Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route, across three functional airspace blocks (FABs). Namely, NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRE FAB - The implementation will support the achievement of the flight efficiency targets for RP2 of the performance scheme. The Performance Review Body (PRB) and the Network Manager (NM) has highlighted the need to pay particular attention to interfaces between the Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) and the deployment of FRA initiatives to achieve these targets - Reducing fuel consumption by allowing users to flightplan their preferred trajectories - Introducing seamless integration among ACCs - Reducing the effort on ATCOs by allowing a more costeffective approach, while keeping the highest level of safety - The implementation also includes EANS (Estonia) who are applying for funding their contribution towards implementation through the Cohesion fund Contributors: Avinor Flysikring AS, Finavia, Irish Aviation Authority, LFV, NATS, Naviair, Ryanair, LGS, EANS, Isavia The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 9 partners (Avinor Flysikring AS, Finavia, IAA, LFV,LGS, NATS, Naviair, EANS, Isavia, Ryanair) and is split into a cohesion and non-cohesion part.

Link and references


Other links: DP2016: Family 3.2.4; Project 2015_227_AF3_A and 2015_227_AF3_B



-




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: -




Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1)

Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)

Type of project: Regional

Schedule: 01/01/2014 - 31/12/2016

Status: Planning is on-going awaiting the implementation of the common NEFRA in June 2016

Description: The Borealis Alliance will implement Free Route Airspace (FRA) within the NEFRA region that consists of the two functional airspace blocks (FAB) of Denmark-Sweden and North European Functional Airspace Block (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Norway). Free Route Airspace is a key element of the Pilot Common Project and NEFRA is a crossborder inter-FAB region of Europe. This project will be broken down into airspace design, fast and real-time simulations and finally implementation. A second part is planned at a later stage to cover also the airspaces of UK, Ireland and Iceland.

Link and references


Other links: DP2016: Family 3.2.4; Project 020AF3



-




Safety: -

Environment: -

Capacity: -

Cost-efficiency: -




13; 35%

6; 16%

8; 22%

8; 22%

2; 5%Completed Ongoing

Planned Late

No Plan Not Applicable

Missing Data Undefined

Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress

6.1. State View

6.1.1. Overall Objective Implementation

Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives

A-CDM is late in implementing objective(s) AOP05 – which is/are planned to be completed by end of 2015 due to modernisation works at Tallinn aerodrome. Preliminary, the implementation of A-CDM planned for the year 2018. The implementation will be further discussed at a later stage.

The implementation of SBAS LPV procedures (NAV10) at Kuressaare aerodrome is planned in 2017. Tallinn aerodrome will be next. The implementation is planned for 2018.

The objectives ATC02.5 and ATC02.7 will be completed with the new ATM system upgrade which is planned for 2016.

The objective SAF11 is currently in the planning stage and is envisaged to be completed by 2018.

Migration from AFTN to AMHS, objective COM10, was performed in 2015. Certification is underway. The conformity of AMHS systems and associated procedures will be ensured by end of June 2016. The implementation of VoIP in ATM, objective COM11, is planned for 2020.

ITY-AGDL – Initial ATC air-ground data link services implementation continuation will start in January 2017 and planned to be finalised on time February, 5 2018.

ITY-AGVCS2 - 8,33 kHz air-ground voice channel spacing implementation below FL195 will start next year and will be finalised by the end of 2018.


6.1.2. Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature

Legend:

## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)

100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline


Average implementation progress: 26%

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

0%

AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM support tools to support A‐FUA 100%

AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of real‐time airspace data 0%

AOM19.3 (PCP) ASM Management of real‐time airspace data 0%

FCM01 Enhanced tactical flow management services 100%

FCM03 Collaborative flight planning 36%

FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1

n/a

FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 0%

FCM05 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP 0%

FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 0%


Advanced Air Traffic Services


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing

n/a

AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace 100%

ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 100%

ATC02.8 Ground‐based Safety Nets 33%

ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures

EETN ‐ Tallinn Airport (Outside Applicability Area)

n/a

ATC12.1 Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring

0%

ATC15.1 Implement, in en‐route operations, information exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN

100%

ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management extended to en‐route airspace

0%

‐

ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 100%

ATC17 Electronic dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer

100%

ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations

EETN ‐ Tallinn Airport 70%

ITY‐COTR Ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes

100%

NAV03 (PCP) RNAV 1 100%

NAV10 APV procedures 0%


High Performing Airport Operations


<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1


AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2


AOP05 Airport CDM


AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation


n/a

AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan


n/a

AOP12 (PCP) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring


n/a

AOP13 (PCP) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing


n/a

ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management


SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions

50%


Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 48%

<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 52%

COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 0%

FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0%

‐

INF04 Integrated briefing 100%

INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 1%

ITY‐ACID Aircraft identification 42%

ITY‐ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

73%

ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC air‐ground data link services 52%

ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195

21%

ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%

ITY‐SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability 86%


6.1.3. ICAO ASBU Implementation

The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.

These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).

Legend:

= Completed (during 2016 or before)

= Missing planning date

= Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable

<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25

B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance

100%

0%

B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)

100%

B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration

100%

B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management

100%

86%

B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%

B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets

100%

66%

B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%

0%

B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)

100%

B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories

100%

B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view

100%

68%

B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%

86%

B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)

100%

85%

B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route

100%

52%


6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress

Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective ‘box’:

o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

ECAC Completed No Plan

EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable

Multi-N Planned Missing Data

APT Late

AOM13.1

Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

0% Planned

‐

Estonia will apply common principles, rules and procedures for OAT handling by the end 2018 (FOC). 31/12/2018

REG (By:12/2018)

Estonian CAA ECAA will revise national legislation as required and inform Eurocontrol on time.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2017

Estonian Air Force

EAF will revise national military aviation regulations as required and inform Eurocontrol on time.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2018)

EANS The implementation of the procedures is posponed to 2018 due to other ongoing prjects.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2018

Estonian Air Force

EAF will apply common principles, rules and procedures OAT/GAT interface.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2018)

Estonian Air Force

Estonian AF will connect national route structures and arrangements to form a flexible system facilitating OAT‐IFR cross‐border flights across Europe and implement harmonised military flight planning for OAT cross‐border operations

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2018

AOM19.1 (PCP)

ASM support tools to support A‐FUA Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

‐

ASM tool is implemented and integrated with NM systems. 31/03/2016

ASP (By:12/2018)

EANS ASM tool is implemented and integrated with NM systems. ‐ 100% Completed

31/03/2016


AOM19.2 (PCP)

ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

EANS plans to implement ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data by the end of 2021. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS EANS plans to implement ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data by the end of 2021.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2021

AOM19.3 (PCP)

Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

EANS plans to implement Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information management by the end of 2021.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS EANS plans to implement Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information management by the end of 2021.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2021

AOM21.1 (PCP)

Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable

‐

Not applicable ‐

ASP (By:12/2017)

EANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable

‐

AOM21.2 (PCP)

Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

100% Completed

‐

Free Route Airspace was implemented within NEFAB area on 12 November 2015. 12/11/2015

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS NEFAB Free Route Airspace was implemented on 12 November 2015.

‐ 100% Completed

12/11/2015

AOP04.1

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011

100% Completed

EETN ‐ Tallinn Airport

A‐SMGCS Level 1 system is implemented on 10 February 2011. 31/12/2013

REG (By:12/2010)

Estonian CAA Transponder operating procedures are published in the AIP. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2013

ASP (By:12/2011)

EANS A‐SMGCS system on the Tallinn airport is implemented on February, 10 2011.

‐ 100% Completed

28/02/2011

APO (By:12/2010)

TALLINN AIRPORT Ltd.

A‐SMGCS system on the Tallinn airport is implemented on February, 10 2011.

‐ 100% Completed

28/02/2011


AOP04.2

Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed


A‐SMGCS Level II system at Tallinn Airport is implemented on 10 February 2011. 28/02/2011

ASP (By:12/2017)

EANS A‐SMGCS Level II system at the Tallinn airport is implemented on 10 February 2011.

‐ 100% Completed

28/02/2011

APO (By:12/2017)


A‐SMGCS Level II system at Tallinn Airport is implemented on 10 February 2011.

‐ 100% Completed

28/02/2011

AOP05

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

0% Late


Estonia posponed implementation of A‐CDM at Tallinn aerodrome to the end of 2018 due to Tallinn Aerodrome reconstruction and ATM systems upgrades.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2016)

EANS EANS plans to define and implement A‐CDM procedures by the end of 2018. Performance objectives and KPIs are not defined yet.

Tallinn Airport A‐CDM

implementation project

0%

Late

31/12/2018

APO (By:12/2016)


Tallinn Airport Ltd plans to define and implement A‐CDM procedures by the end of 2018. Performance objectives and KPIs are not defined yet.

Tallinn Airport A‐CDM

implementation project

0%

Late

31/12/2018

AOP10 (PCP)

Time Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


Not Applicable as EETN is not in the mandatory applicability area of he PCP IR (716/2014) ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

ASP (By:12/2023)

AOP11 (PCP)

Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


PCP‐related, no Applicability Area specified in the PCP IR for this functionality. ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)


‐

APO (By:12/2021)


‐ ‐ % Not Applicable

‐


AOP12 (PCP)

Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


PCP‐related. N/A as EETN is not in the mandatory applicability area for this functionality (PCP IR; 716/2014).

‐

ASP (By:12/2020)

APO (By:12/2020)

AOP13 (PCP)

Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


Not applicable ‐

REG (By:12/2023)

Estonian CAA ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable

‐

ASP (By:12/2023)


‐

ATC02.8

Ground‐based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

33% Late

‐

APW has been implemented. Plans for other functions to be reassessed. 31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2016)

EANS APW has been implemented. No plans for other functions. ‐ 33% Late

31/12/2018

ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable


Estonia is not part of the initial applicability area. ‐

ASP (By:12/2019)


‐

ATC12.1

Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring implementation is planned. Some MONA functionalities (RAM, CLAM, Duplicated code) are implemented.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS

Automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring implementation is planned. Some MONA functionalities (RAM, CLAM, Duplicated code) are implemented.

‐ 0%

Planned

31/12/2021


ATC15.1

Implement, in en‐route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

100% Completed

‐

In En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures are implemented. 31/01/2017

ASP (By:12/2017)

EANS In En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures are implemented.

‐ 100% Completed

31/01/2017

ATC15.2 (PCP)

Arrival Management extended to en‐route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

0% No Plan

‐

No plan ‐

ASP (By:12/2023)

EANS No plan ‐ 0% No Plan

‐

ATC17

Electronic Dialogue as automated assistance to controller during coordination and transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

100% Completed

‐

The ground systems have been upgraded and the functions implemented. The staff has been trained. 31/12/2016

ASP (By:12/2018)

EANS The ground systems have been upgraded and the functions implemented. The staff has been trained.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2016

COM10

Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018

52% Ongoing

‐

The migration took place in August 2016. No plan for Extended ATSMHS yet. 31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

EANS The migration took place in August 2016. No plan for Extended ATSMHS yet.

‐ 52% Ongoing

31/12/2018

COM11

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020

0% Planned

‐

Voice over Internet Protocol in ATM will be implemented by the end of 2020 (Full Operational Capability). 31/12/2020

ASP (By:12/2020)

EANS EANS plans to implement VoIP in ATM by the end of 2020. ‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2020


ENV01

Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013

70% Late


CDA and P‐RNAV procedures were implemented in Tallinn TMA 30 MAy 2013. Performance monitoring is not in place yet. The new implementation date is end of 2017.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2013)

EANS EANS implemented P‐RNAV and CDA techniques on May 2013. ‐ 100% Completed

30/06/2013

APO (By:12/2013)


Monitoring of performance is not established yet. Tallinn Airport will co‐ordinate the activities and report performance feedback to allow continual improvement.

‐ 10%

Late

31/12/2017

ENV02

Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

55% Late


Estonia is not implemented CEM as previously planned by 2015. New date is end of 2016. Tallinn Airport Ltd participates actively in the formal partnership arrangements with the ANSP and Aircraft Operators. Currently there are no formal regulations or agreements yet.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2016)

EANS

EANS has nominated a person to deal with environmental matters. On 12/4/2009 a meeting was held in EANS where CEM was introduced by Eurocontrol environmental unit specialists. This subject is addressed through the North European ANSP Cooperation Project. EANS participates actively in the formal partnership arrangements with the Airport and Aircraft Operators. EANS trained controllers in the environmental implecations of aircraft operations within CDA/PRNAV project.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/03/2013

APO (By:12/2016)


Tallinn Airport has implemented its own environmental management system according to the requirements of ISO 14001:2005. Performance monitoring is described in Quality Management Manual. Tallinn airport participates actively in the formal partnership arrangements with the ANSP and Aircraft Operators. Airport procedures will be developed and implemented by end 2017.

‐ 33%

Late

31/12/2017

FCM03

Collaborative flight planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017

36% Ongoing

‐

Flight plan messages, at Tallinn ACC, are processed in ICAO format. The Eurocat 2000 system enables messages in ADEXP format for processing flight plan messages. Provision of AFP messages functionaly is available but not tested and not in operational use.

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2017)

EANS During the major Eurocat system upgrade, all the requirements implemented. AFP functionality will be provided by the end of 2017.

‐ 36% Ongoing

31/12/2017


FCM04.1

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐

% Not Applicable

‐

STAM Phase 1 is not applicable for Estonia. ‐

ASP (By:10/2017)

EANS STAM Phase 1 is not applicable for Estonia. ‐ % Not Applicable

‐

FCM04.2 (PCP)

Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ phase 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

EANS plans to introduce Short Term ATFCM Measures. 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS EANS plans to introduce Short Term ATFCM Measures. ‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2021

FCM05 (PCP)

Interactive rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

Interactive rolling is implemented in 2016. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021.

31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS Interactive rolling is implemented in 2016. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2021

APO (By:12/2021)


Airport slot information will be provided to DDR. ‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2021

FCM06 (PCP)

Traffic complexity assessment Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% Planned

‐

The tools supporting local traffic load management will be implemented by 2021 31/12/2021

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS The tools supporting local traffic load management will be implemented by 2021

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2021

FCM08 (PCP)

Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021

0% No Plan

‐

No plan ‐

ASP (By:12/2021)

EANS No plan ‐ 0% No Plan

‐


INF07

Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018

1% Late

‐

Electronic TOD will be established by 31 May 2018. 31/12/2018

REG (By:05/2018)

Estonian CAA All ECAA related activities will be performed on time. ‐ 3% Ongoing

31/05/2018

ASP (By:05/2018)

EANS All EANS related activities will be performed after National TOD Policy is available.

‐ 0% Late

31/12/2018

APO (By:05/2018)


All AO related activities will be performed after National TOD Policy is available.

‐ 0% Late

31/12/2018

ITY‐ACID

Aircraft identification Timescales: Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020

42% Ongoing

‐

Wide Area Multilateration system is implemented and tested. Sertification process is in progress. ARTAS integration is underway. New implementation date is related to operational evaluation of Mode ‐S functionality. Safety argument of the changes imposed by the implementation of the capability allowing the establishment of the individual aircraft identification using the downlinked aircraft identification feature will be developed in 2018.

31/12/2018

ASP (By:01/2020)

EANS

Wide Area Multilateration system is implemented in 2015. Sertification process is in progress. ARTAS integration is underway. New implementation date is posponed to June 2017. Safety argument of the changes imposed by the implementation of the capability allowing the establishment of the individual aircraft identification using the downlinked aircraft identification feature will be developed in 2018.

‐ 42%

Ongoing

31/12/2018

ITY‐ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Timescales: Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017

73% Late

‐

Estonia plans to implement all aeronautical data and aeronautical information quality requirements by the end of 2017.

31/12/2017

REG (By:06/2017)

Estonian CAA All ECAA related activities will be performed on time. ‐ 62% Ongoing

30/06/2017

ASP (By:06/2017)

EANS All ANSP related activities will be performed by the end of 2017.

‐ 73% Late

31/12/2017

APO (By:06/2017)


All Airport related activities will be performed in 2017. ‐ 80% Ongoing

30/06/2017


ITY‐AGDL

Initial ATC air‐ground data link services Timescales: Entry into force: 06/02/2009 ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020

52% Ongoing

‐

Estonia will implement Data data link services in Tallinn FIR in February 2018. 05/02/2018

REG (By:02/2018)

Estonian CAA ECAA will ensure the processing and the distribution of the information on the data link capability by the IFPS.

‐ 33% Ongoing

05/02/2018

ASP (By:02/2018)

EANS EANS will implement Data link services in Tallinn FIR in February 2018.

Air‐ground data link

implementation

62%

Ongoing

05/02/2018

MIL (By:01/2019)

Estonian Air Force


‐

ITY‐AGVCS2

8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195 Timescales: Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020

21% Ongoing

‐

Implementation of air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 is planned for 2018. 31/12/2020

REG (By:12/2018)

Estonian CAA Implementation of air‐ground voice channel spacing requirements below FL195 is planned for 2018.

‐ 35% Ongoing

31/12/2018

ASP (By:12/2018)

EANS Tallinn FIR radio renewed according to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 in December 2015. Frequency conversion is planned for 2018.

‐ 25% Ongoing

31/12/2018

MIL (By:12/2020)

Estonian Air Force

The exemptions (8,33kHz radios) for state aircraft will be reviewed.

‐ 0% Planned

31/12/2020

APO (By:12/2018)

Estonian Air Force


‐



‐


ITY‐FMTP

Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014

100% Completed

‐

A common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) is implemented during a major system upgrade. Migration to IP v6 is completed in 2015. Connections with Malmöe and Stockholm of Sweden are operational since August 2015.

30/09/2015

ASP (By:12/2014)

EANS

A common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) is implemented during a major system upgrade. Connections with Malmöe and Stockholm of Sweden are operational since August 2015.

‐ 100%

Completed

30/09/2015

MIL (By:12/2014)

Estonian Air Force

Military ATC do not provide RADAR services ‐ % Not Applicable

‐

ITY‐SPI

Surveillance performance and interoperability Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020

86% Late

‐

Surveillance data interoperability is already ensured. Safety assessment to all existing systems will be finalised by the end of April 2017 and the report will be delivered to the NSA.

30/04/2017

REG (By:02/2015)

Estonian CAA Formal acceptance of the ANSPs safety assessment reports communicated to the ANSP.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:02/2015)

EANS Surveillance data interoperability is already ensured. Safety assessment to all existing systems will be finalised by the end of April and the report will be delivered to the NSA.

‐ 75% Late

30/04/2017

MIL (By:06/2020)

Estonian Air Force

All a/c equipped with transponders capable with Mode S. Further upgrade for mil a/c is not planned

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

NAV03 (PCP)

RNAV 1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023

100% Completed

‐

P‐RNAV procedures and CDA in Tallinn TMA implemented on 30 May 2013. 31/05/2013

ASP (By:12/2023)

EANS

The project started in 2008 with the feasibility study. In 2011 EANS started with LFV GNSS based P‐RNAV/CDA implementation project. Implementation of the procedures is planned for May 2013.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/05/2013


NAV10

APV procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016

0% Late

‐

APV/Baro is implemented at Tartu aerodrome in 2013. APV/Baro and APV/SBAS will be introduced at Kuressaare and Kärdla aerodromes in 2016. Tallinn planned for 2018.

31/12/2018

REG (By:04/2016)

Estonian CAA The national PBN plan is still under development. ‐ 0% Late

31/12/2017

ASP (By:12/2016)

EANS EANS will implement LPV at Tallinn aerodrome in 2018. Tallinn Airport Ltd is responsible for the implementation at the other aerodromes.

‐ 0% Late

31/12/2018

SAF11

Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018

50% Ongoing

‐

Appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions will be implemented.

31/01/2018

REG (By:01/2018)

Estonian CAA

Appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Excursions will be implemented. Implementation will be reported through the appropriate mechanism.

‐ 0%

Planned

31/01/2018

ASP (By:12/2014)

Estonian Air Force

‐ 0% No Plan

‐

EANS Action plan part 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 completed. Digital ATIS is implemented.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2016

APO (By:12/2014)

Estonian Air Force


‐


‐ ‐ 0% Missing Data

‐


6.3. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress – Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring

ATC02.2

Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013

100% Completed

‐

STCA Level II function was implemented in 2012 and safety assessment was performed. Safety oversight was conducted on time.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:01/2013)

EANS

The EUROCAT 2000 System has STCA implemented and operational (Initial Operational Capability). The STCA Level 2 was implemented and operational since 2002. FOC was implemented in March 2012.

‐ 100%

Completed

31/12/2012

ATC16

Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015

100% Completed

‐

ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 is implemented on time. 31/12/2015

REG (By:12/2015)

Estonian CAA ECAA has supervised compliance with regulatory provisions for ACAS II (TCAS II version 7.1).

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

ASP (By:03/2012)

EANS The ATC staff was trained in December 2015. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2015

MIL (By:12/2015)

Estonian Air Force

Estonian Air Force do not operate fixed wing aircraft applicable to the objective.

‐ % Not Applicable

‐

FCM01

Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006

100% Completed

‐

Since May 2008 Estonia is in the IFPS zone. Currently only the FMP is connected to NM. During the major system upgrade, all the requirements were implemented in 2012. FSA, CPR format tuning and testing completed. NM/ETFMS supplies with flight plan related updates that are only available shortly before departure.

30/06/2015

ASP (By:07/2014)

EANS All necessary functionalities are installed during system upgrade. Tuning, testing and LoA revision completed.

3d ACC Sector Implementati

on 100%

Completed

30/06/2015


INF04

Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

An integrated self‐briefing unit is established at Tallinn AD as of 20 May 2008. Access is possible via Internet; via dedicated communication lines or at Estonians AROs.

31/12/2008

ASP (By:12/2012)

EANS A level 5 integrated briefing is operational. ‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2008

ITY‐COTR

Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes Timescales: Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012

100% Completed

‐

Implementation of G‐G automated co‐ordination has been finalised within Eurocat 2000 upgrade projekt in 2012.

31/12/2012

ASP (By:12/2012)

EANS OLDI basic messages exchange is implemented. Other ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes and the training of ATC personel have been performed.

‐ 100% Completed

31/12/2012

MIL (By:12/2012)

Estonian Air Force

Currently military do not provide service to civil flights. ‐ % Not Applicable

‐


ANNEXES

Annex A - Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination

LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name

LSSIP Focal Point for Estonia Estonian ANS Viktor Popov

LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Estonian CAA Eve Härm

LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Estonian ANS Viktor Popov

LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Tallinn Airport Raul Ratasep

LSSIP Focal Point for Military Estonian Defence Forces Air Force

Reet Stamm

EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support

Function Directorate Name

LSSIP Contact Person for Estonia DPS/PEPR Luca DELL’ ORTO


Implementation Objectives

Implementation

Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners

EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator

National Stakeholder Specialist

AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Tarmo PIHLAK

AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Tarmo PIHLAK



AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Tarmo PIHLAK

AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Tarmo PIHLAK

AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Raul RATASEP

AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Raul RATASEP

AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Raul RATASEP



AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Raul RATASEP

AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Raul RATASEP

ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER Vladimir SAITOR

ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Vladimir SAITOR

ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Vladimir SAITOR

ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL’ORTO Vladimir SAITOR

ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL’ORTO Vladimir SAITOR

ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Vladimir SAITOR

COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO Mati TARLAP

COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Mati TARLAP

ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Mati TARLAP

ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL Katy PÄRN

FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA Katy PÄRN

FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA Tarmo PIHLAK

FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA Tarmo PIHLAK

FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA Tarmo PIHLAK

FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER Tarmo PIHLAK

FCM07 C. BOUMAN O. ALFARO Tarmo PIHLAK

FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA Tarmo PIHLAK

FCM09 R. STEVENS O. CIOARA Tarmo PIHLAK

INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Tarmo PIHLAK

ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Eve HÄRM


ITY-AGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL Aigar TARRE

ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Aigar TARRE

ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Aigar TARRE

ITY-SPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA Mati TARLAP

ITY-AGDL S. DISSING B. HILL Mati TARLAP

NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC Vladimir SHAITOR

NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC Mati TARLAP

SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER Mati TARLAP


Annex B - National Stakeholders Organisation charts

Estonian Civil Aviation Administration structure



Annex C - Glossary of Abbreviations

This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Estonia.

Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries.

Term Description

AF ATM Functionality

FT Fast Track

NEFAB North European Functional Airspace Block

NEFRA North European Free Route Airspace

PCP Pilot Common Project

PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme

S-AF Sub ATM Functionality

Date post:	20-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times