+ All Categories
Home > Documents > “Location, Location, Location!” The ‘Where’ of Managed ...

“Location, Location, Location!” The ‘Where’ of Managed ...

Date post: 14-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
22
John Lindquist UNITED WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT March 07, 2018 “Location, Location, Location!” The ‘Where’ of Managed Artificial Recharge Can Be Just as Important as ‘How Much’ in Achieving Groundwater Sustainability
Transcript

John LindquistUNITED WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTMarch 07, 2018

“Location, Location, Location!”The ‘Where’ of Managed Artificial

Recharge Can Be Just as Important as‘How Much’ in Achieving Groundwater

Sustainability

THE CRUX OF THE MATTER(ASKING FOR A FRIEND…)

1. If the recharge in my basin equals or exceeds discharge, I’m good, right?

2. If not, what are the options?

2

OUTLINE

1. Real-world example of the concepts

2. Getting quantitative with simplified examples

3. A STAR TREK “teachable moment”

4. Potential impacts of shifting recharge locations

5. Back to the real world6. Concluding thoughts

SanFrancisco

Sacramento

Los Angeles

Ventura County

VENTURA COUNTY AND UNITED WCD

Oxnard

Santa Barbara

Palmdale

Los Angeles

Santa Clarita

VENTURACOUNTY

UWCD

Pacific Ocean

Oxnard

Ventura

Camarillo

Freeman Diversion

United WCDSpreading Grounds

PortHueneme

NBVCPt. Mugu

OXNARD COASTAL PLAIN

Pacific Ocean

OXNARD SUB-BASIN

PLEASANT VALLEYBASIN

FOREBAYAREA

MOST RECHARGE FOR THE OXNARD COASTAL PLAIN OCCURS IN THE NORTH

6

FreemanDiversion

Infiltration basins

Santa ClaraRiver

Oxnard

Ventura

Camarillo

OXNARD SUB-BASIN

PLEASANT VALLEYBASIN

FOREBAYAREA

Freeman Diversion

United WCDSpreading Grounds

PortHueneme

NBVCPt. Mugu

WHERE DOES THAT RECHARGE GO?

Pacific Ocean

Oxnard

Ventura

Camarillo

PortHueneme

NBVCPt. Mugu

PUMPING ON OXNARD COASTAL PLAIN

EXAMPLE 1 (BASE CASE)—”EXISTING PUMPING”

9

River: +2,900

ET: -900

Spreading: +22,000Areal Recharge:

+28,000

Pumping: +50,000

Ocean (constant head = +5 ft msl)

All units in AF/yr

Net Seawater Flux: -1,900

EXAMPLE 2—”REDUCED PUMPING”

10

River: +2,300

ET: -1,300

Spreading: +22,000

Areal Recharge: +28,000

Pumping: +45,000 All units in AF/yr

Net Seawater Flux: -5,800

Oxnard

Ventura

Camarillo

Freeman Diversion

PortHueneme

NBVCPt. Mugu

IMPACT OF REDUCING PUMPING BY 10%

11

4,000 acres

=31 avg-sizedfarms

= 60,000 tons/yrof produce(enough for170,000 people)

=$91 million/yrdirect income

(~1,500 jobs)Or, bulldoze 3,000 acres of homes and industry?

A TEACHABLE MOMENT

• War on planet Eminiar 7 is conducted by computer simulation

• a model

• The people of the planet feel this is better than facing the real horrors of war

• The model forecasts who would have lived and died in each battle

• Then the government sends those people to “disintegration chambers”

• Captain Kirk destroys the disintegration chambers and suggests alternative ways to handle conflict

Be like Capt. Kirk, not an Eminiarian!12

“A Taste of Armageddon” (Season 1, Feb. 1967)

EXAMPLE 3—”FOCUSED RECHARGE”

13

River: +2,900 ET: -800

Old Spreading Basins: 0

Areal Recharge: +28,000

Pumping: +50,000

All units in AF/yr

New Spreading Basins: +14,000

New Injection Wells: +8,000

Net Seawater Flux: -1,900

EXAMPLE 4—”SURFACE-WATER DELIVERIES IN-LIEU OF PUMPING (AND RECHARGE)”

14

River: +4,000 ET: 0

Spreading: +2,000

Areal Recharge: +28,000

Pumping: +30,000

All units in AF/yr

Net Seawater Flux: -4,100

BACK TO THE REAL WORLD: OXNARD COASTAL PLAIN

15

• Population: ~400,000 people• Military facilities: 3

• Farmland: 35,000 acres• ~500,000 tons/yr produce• ~$1 Billion economic impact

• Current water needs: 139,000 AF/yr• ~99,000 AF/yr from pumping• ~40,000 AF/yr from imports

19TH CENTURY (PRE-DEVELOPMENT)

South North

16

20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES

17

18

HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC MODEL

Model Layer 1, Semi-perched Aquifer

Model Layer 3, Oxnard Aquifer

Model Layer 7, Hueneme Aquifer

Model Layer 13,Grimes Canyon Aquifer

19

NUMERICAL MODEL BOUNDARIES

“GSP-LITE” RESULTS FOR PUMPING SCENARIOS(NO NEW WATER-SUPPLY PROJECTS)

Scenario Pumping Rate Changes

Avg. GW Extractions

(AF/yr)

Reduction in Pumping

(%)

Base Case No changes in 1985-2015pumping rates 99,000 0

Reduced Pumping 50% “haircut” in pumping 49,000 50

ShiftedPumping

No pumping in coastal area, 75% reduction in lower-aquifer pumping, 50% increase in upper-

aquifer pumping69,000 30

20

CONCLUDING THOUGHTS• The idea that basin inflow = outflow makes for

sustainable yield was always in doubt• Now, under SGMA, it’s totally dead

• In my simplistic examples, sustainable yield can increase or decrease 10% simply by moving recharge around or using it in a different way

• In the (incomplete) Oxnard coastal plain analysis, just moving pumping around can influence yield by 20% or more

• United hasn’t yet evaluated options for moving recharge or changing in-lieu deliveries of surface water—could we get another 10 or 20% increase in the sustainable yield number? Stay tuned! 21

CONTACT INFORMATION:

22

John Lindquist, PG, CHGSenior Hydrogeologist

UNITED WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT106 N 8th Street - Santa Paula, CA 93060

Office: (805) 525-4431 Direct: (805) [email protected] www.unitedwater.org


Recommended