Acquisition Academy
Strategic Sourcing with Small Business in Mind
Acquisition Academy
Lora GrossLora GrossMay, 2011
Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. REPORT DATE MAY 2011 2. REPORT TYPE
3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Strategic Sourcing With Small Business In Mind
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Department of Veterans Affairs Acquisition Academy,810 VermontAvenue, NW,Washington,DC, 20420
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at the 8th Annual Acquisition Research Symposium, May 11-12, Monterey, CA
14. ABSTRACT
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Same as
Report (SAR)
18. NUMBEROF PAGES
24
19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON
a. REPORT unclassified
b. ABSTRACT unclassified
c. THIS PAGE unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
Agenda
Strategic Sourcing Memorandum and Opportunities
Small Business Concerns
Single Award SourcingSingle Award Sourcing
Better Ways for Small Business Inclusion
1
Strategic Sourcing Memorandum
Save Money, Improve PerformanceConsolidate RequirementsLeverage Buying PowerBecome a “Best Customer”
2
Strategic Sourcing Memorandum
Definition
“Collaborative and structured process of critically analyzing an organization’s spendin and using this information to make businessorganization’s spending and using this information to make business decisions about acquiring commodities and services more effectively and efficiently.”
Meant to “help agencies optimize performance, minimize price increase achievement of socio-economic acquisition goals, evaluate total life cyc gement costs improve ve dor access tototal life cycle management costs, improve vendor access to business opportunities, and otherwise increase the value of each dollar spent.”
3
Reference: Johnson III, C. (2005). Implementing Strategic Sourcing. Memorandum for the Chief Acquisition Officers, Chief Financial Officers, and Chief Information Officers. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.
Strategic Sourcing
Air Force Strate ic Sourcin Exam leg g
Information Technology
Reduced 1,000 IT contracts to seven;Dollar savings of $65 1 millioDollar savings of $65.1 million;Cost avoidance of more than $155 million between FY2004 and 2008; Decreased workload of contracting departments; andIncreased spending toward small businesses.
4
Importance of Small Businesses
Small Businesses Statistics
Made up for little more than half of the US private sector workforce.Paid 44% of the total US private payrollPaid 44% of the total US private payroll.Generated 64% of new jobs.Out-produced large businesses in innovation.
• Applied for patents 13 times more per employee than large firms.
5
Strategic Sourcing vs. Small Businesses
Strategic Sourcing generally involves procurementsLarge in scope or volume;Geographically dispersed customers; andHigh in dollar value.
6
Consolidation, not Bundling
Consolidation – takin on previousl erformed actions g p yunder two or more separate contracts, and combines them into one contract.
Reduces the number of available contract opportunitiesReduces the number of available contract opportunitiesNarrows the potential pool of vendorsBenefits must be documented, justified and approved prior to being implemented
7
Consolidation, not Bundling
Bundling – FAR 2.101 consolidates “two or more g ( )procurement requirements for goods or services previously provided or performed under separate, small contracts into a solicitation o o f n ra t l lsolicitation of offers for a single contract that is unlikely to be suitable for award to a small business concern due to:
1. The diversity, size or specialized nature of the elements of the performance specified;
2. The aggregate dollar value of the anticipated award;3. The geographical dispersion of the contract performance sites; or4. Any combination of these factors”
8
Small Business Concerns Regarding Bundling
Durin FY 1992 throu h 2001g gFor every 100 bundled contracts, 60 individual contracts are no longer available to small businesses.For every $100 awarded on a bundled contract there is a $12For every $100 awarded on a bundled contract, there is a $12 decrease to small businesses (Murphy, 2000).
While bundled actions w 6%While bundled actions decreased between FY 2005 and 2006 by 6%, the total dollars under these actions increased by almost 42% (NASB, 2008).
9
Strategic Sourcing Impact on Small Business
Contract Management – An end goal of Strategic Sourcing is to “limit the number of vendors and …[offer] exclusivity of contract as a means of aggregati r ocontract as a means of aggregating volume in return for lower prices.”
10
Strategic Sourcing Impact on Small Business
Washington Report – “Strategic Sourcing is nothing more than an effort to limit the number of sellers of goods and services to a very select few, none of which, if present trends continue, will be small, independetrends continue, will be small, independe p dealers…simply a more severe version of contract bundling ....”
11
Single Award Sourcing
Allowable under FAR– Justified– Congressional notification within 30 days of determination
FAR 16 504(c)(1)(ii)(D) provides exceptions– FAR 16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D) provides exceptions
2008 statute for awards exceeding $100 million– Requires multiple awards– Encourages competition at the ta rder (TO) and delivery order– Encourages competition at the task order (TO) and delivery order
(DO) level
12
Single Award Sourcing
Challen es for Sin le Awardsg g
Do not permit competition at the TO/DO level
No incentives for further price reductions
Not in alignment with political agendas for competition
Office of Management Budget oversight for non-competitive awards
Limits otential for innovative solutions for a encies
13
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
Small Business Contractin Partici ationg
– FY 2007 to 2008
• Increase of 12% in prime contract awards
• Only 8 of 15 Cabinet-level agencies met the Government-wide goal of 23% of total contract dollars awarded to small businesses
14
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
Incorporate agency’s small business subcontracting goals into the contract.
Levera e ast erformance as an evaluation factor relative to the rime g p p , pcontractor’s ability to comply with its proposed small business subcontracting goals on prior contracts similar in size, scope and complexity.
Use performance-based contracting and performance incentives.
Leverage contract option clauses contingent on compliance with small business subcontracting goals.
100% set-aside GWACs15
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
Incor orate a enc ’s small business g ysubcontracting goals into the contract.
FAR 19.702, purchases > SAT must agree to include small businesses to the maximum extent practicable.
FAR 52.219-9 instructs contractors to submit contracting lans that clearl define the ercenta e and total dollars set y g
aside for a small business.
16
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
Incor orate a enc ’s small business g ysubcontracting goals into the contract.
Agenc Le el Reg lationsAgency Level Regulations
VA’s Final Rule regarding Veteran’s First Program instructing evaluation credit for SDVOSB and VOSB participationfor SDVOSB and VOSB participation.
VAAR 819.704 – subcontracting goals must be commensurate with the annual VA SDVOSB/VO me contracting goal for the total value of plannedVA SDVOSB/VOSB prime contracting goal for the total value of planned subcontracts.
DTAR rovides bonus score when ro osals include a mentor- roté é garrangement with a small business.
17
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
Levera e ast performance as an evaluation factor g p ,relative to the prime contractor’s ability to comply with
its proposed small business subcontracting goals on prior contracts similar in s a ycontracts similar in size, scope and complexity.
Request and evaluate certified letters from previous contracts as part of their past performance evaluationpast performance evaluation.
More weight on this factor = greater compliance
Agency requirement of certification for an annual deliverable.
18
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
Use performance-based contracting p gand performance incentives.
Subcontracting accountability by withholding a small percentage (~1%) of the total subcontracting dollars (vs. total contract) from the contractor until they provide evidencetotal contract) from the contractor until they provide evidence of their subcontracting efforts.
19
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
Levera e contract o tion clauses contin ent on g gcompliance with small business subcontracting goals.
Withhold the exercise of options until the contractor submits certified evidence he t their tcertified evidence that they met their subcontracting goals for the preceding period of performance, in accordance with their proposals.
20
Better Way for Small Business Inclusion
100% Set-Aside GWACs
Competitively Awarded
Multiple AwardsMultiple Awards
Interagency Use
21
Conclusion
Obama administration and OMB ac uisition a endas: gEncourage reductions in overall contract spending;
Increased com etitionp ;
Increased Small Business opportunities
Procure more efficiently and effectivelProcure more efficiently and effectively
Effective Strategic Sourcing can meet all of these requirements and leverage buying power, encouraging economic support to Small Businesses.
22
Questions?
23