A FORCE FOR PROGRESS 2011: Labor’s Legislative Scorecard
California Labor Federation | www.CaliforniaLabor.org
jg/tng39521cwa/afl-cio
Rome Aloise Bob BalgenorthJim BenoRuss BurnsRandy Cammack Allan ClarkTom DalzellThom Davis Damita Davis-HowardOscar De La Torre
Rose Ann DeMoroMaria Elena DurazoRob FecknerEnrique Fernandez Mike Garcia Lorena Gonzalez Jack GribbonLa Kesha Harrison Marty Hittelman Eugene Hudson
Shelley Kessler Marvin Kropke George Landers Rick LathamBill A. LloydJacques LoveallGunnar LundebergMalinda MarkowitzLarry Mazzola, Sr. Michael F. Miller
Doug MooreOscar Owens Lou PaulsonLee PearsonJoshua PechthaltWillie PeloteMike QuevedoClyde RiversSal RosselliRay Sesma
Al ShurJohn L. SmithJoe StandleyWilliam Waggoner Jim WeitkampNancy Wohlforth
ExEcutivE SEcrEtary-trEaSurEr: Art Pulaski • PrESidEnt: Connie Leyva
vicE PrESidEntS:
hEadquartErS:600 Grand Avenue, Suite 410 | Oakland, CA 94610-3561 | Tel: (510) 663-4000 | Fax: (510) 663-4099
lEgiSlativE officE: 1127 11th Street, Suite 425 | Sacramento, CA 95814-3809 | Tel: (916) 444-3676 | Fax: (916) 444-7693
A Force for Progress 2011LAbor’s LegisLAtive scorecArd
A review of the legislAtive yeAr by the
CaliforniaLABORFederation
California LABOR Federation
CaliforniaLABORFederation
California LABOR Federation
20% black
The California labor federaTion is dedicated to promoting and defending the
interests of working people and their families. With more than 1,200 affiliated local unions
representing 2.1 million union members, we are actively engaged in every aspect of
California’s economy and government. Together, we craft and support legislation that
protects working families, and we hold our legislators accountable. Together, we are
the California labor Movement.
on the cover: We Are One march on the Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge, Vallejo, CA. April 4, 2011. Photography: Susan Sachen
A Force for Progress 2011LAbor’s LegisLAtive scorecArd
about this Scorecard: This legislative scorecard reviews Labor’s legislative progress in 2011 and rates the performance of California legislators. You will find a balance sheet of Labor’s legislative wins and losses, the Governor’s record, a description of key bills the Federation and our affiliated unions lobbied for and against, and a scorecard for all Senate and Assembly members on each bill. All unions should review this scorecard as they consider candidates to support for elections.
contents
LegisLaTors WiTh 100% Labor VoTing reCord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2011 in reVieW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
goVernor broWn’s reCord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
biLL desCripTions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
assembLy VoTing reCord summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
senaTe VoTing reCord summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
assembLy FLoor VoTes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
senaTe FLoor VoTes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
CommiTTee VoTes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
To view this document online or to download an individual legislator’s
scorecard, visit www.CaliforniaLabor.org
California LABOR Federation
California Labor Federation page 3page 2 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011
SenaTe
aSSeMbly
EllEn corbEttD – san leanDro
tom ammianoD – san FranCIsCo
Paul fongD – mountaIn vIew
marty blockD – san DIego
rogEr hErnándEzD – balDwIn park
daS williamSD - santa barbara
jim bEallD – san jose
mary hayaShiD – haywarD
Sandré SwanSonD – oaklanD
bob blumEnfiEldD - van nuys
ricardo laraD – south gate
mariko yamadaD – DavIs
mark dESaulniErD – ConCorD
mikE Eng D - monterey park
tony mEndoza D – artesIa
loni hancock D – oaklanD
mark lEno D – san FranCIsCo
legiSlaTorS wiTh 100% labor voTing reCord in 2011
N 100%
Labor
VoTing
reCord
nancy SkinnEr D – berkeley
a forCe for ProgreSS 2011
Our nation now has the greatest inequality in recorded history. Big business and the banks sit on record profits, while families struggle just to put food on the table. Companies aren’t hiring, banks aren’t lending, and the recession isn’t ending for us.
It is no coincidence that at a time of such great inequality, we have seen renewed attacks on the freedom to join a union and bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions. While workers filled the Wisconsin statehouse to protest the elimination of collective bargaining for teachers and state employees, California’s workers are mobilizing to defeat yet another attempt to silence our voice in the political process. Just when America needs unions most, we are under concerted attack from coast to coast.
Workers won’t be silenced. Who else will stand up to the corporations that want tax breaks to send our jobs off-shore? Or the banks that would rather take a family’s home than renegotiate their loan? Workers must have the right to speak in a collective voice or we’ll always be drowned out by the corpo-rate megaphone.
In California, the tide is turning. After seven years of a Schwarze negger Administration that turned its back on workers, we now have a Governor who believes in a fair economy, in funding our schools and our public safety, and
in restoring the California Dream. This year, California Labor made real prog-ress to revive our economy, protect our communities, and restore hope for the future.
Labor’s agenda is about the California we all believe in: better jobs, greater opportunity, and stronger communities – not just for union members, but for all Californians. That will be our common ground as we rebuild our economy and bring back our state’s promise. The men and women who built this state, and whose work makes it run, deserve no less.
In Unity,
For millions of California workers, the economy has been devastating. Lost jobs, lost homes and lost dreams.
Art Pulaski Executive Secretary-Treasurer
Connie Leyva President
Supported bills assembly1. liMiT CrediT CheCkS. ab 22 (Mendoza).
Would help put people back to work by restricting the use of credit scores in employment decisions. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 21-17 on 9/8/11 assembly: 45-29 on 5/19/11
2. healTh inSuranCe raTe regulaTion. ab 52 (feuer). Would protect Californians from unreasonable health insurance rate hikes by requiring state approval of increases in premiums, co-pays or deductibles.
held on senate floor assembly: 45-28 on 6/2/11
3. inClude ClaSSified in CharTer PeTiTion. ab 86 (Mendoza). Would include classified school employees in the decision about whether to convert to a charter school. ➤ veToed by The governor
senate: 22-14 on 9/7/11 assembly: 48-25 on 4/25/11
4. eMPower Child Care ProviderS. ab 101 (Pérez). Would give child care providers a voice in improving conditions in their industry. ➤ veToed by governor
senate: 23-15 on 9/8/11 assembly: 51-27 on 9/9/11
5. TranSParenCy in STaTe ConTraCTing. ab 172 (eng). Would increase transparency over state contracting practices. ➤ veToed by The governor*
senate: 27-13 on 9/8/2011 assembly: 54-25 on 9/9/11
6. no alCohol SaleS in Self-CheCkouT. ab 183 (Ma). Would promote public safety and good jobs by prohibiting alcohol sales from self-check out machines. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 21-16 on 9/8/11 assembly: 48-26 on 5/26/11
Supported bills
7. daMageS for MiniMuM wage violaTionS. ab 240 (bonilla): Would allow workers who have been paid less than minimum wage but cannot afford a lawyer to get the same recovery in the Labor Commissioner’s wage claim process that they would have gotten in court. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 24-14 on 8/18/11 assembly: 50-22 on 5/5/11
8. ProTeCT farMworkerS froM abuSeS. ab 243 (alejo). Would require that farmworker paystubs list the name of the grower, not just the labor contractor. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 24-14 on 8/29/11 assembly: 47-28 on 5/23/11
9. worker reTenTion for ConTraCT workerS. ab 350 (Solorio). Would give security guards and food service workers 60 days to stay on after a contract changes hands to give them a shot at keeping their jobs.
failed on senate floor assembly: 46-31 on 5/31/11
10. workerS’ CoMPenSaTion PreSuMPTion for nurSeS. ab 375 (Skinner). Would ensure that nurses who contract MRSA or other blood-borne infections don’t have to fight with an insurer to get coverage by creating a workers’ compensation presumption.
failed on senate floor assembly: 49-25 on 6/1/11
11. iMProve labor CoMPlianCe. ab 436 (Solorio) Would protect construction workers and good contractors by improving enforcement of the state’s prevailing wage law. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 22-10 on 9/7/11 assembly: 51-27 on 9/9/11
12. liMiT library ConTraCTing ouT. ab 438 (williams). Would protect a community’s access to library services by restricting contracting out unless specific safeguards are met. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 24-15 on 9/8/11 assembly: 45-28 on 9/8/11
* AB 172: Governor issued an executive order on transparency
California Labor Federation page 5
key labor billS: 2011 governor brown’S reCord on labor billS in 2011
key labor billS: 2011
N goVernor
broWn’s
reCord on
Labor biLLs
in 2011
labor SuPPorTed billS Signed
➤ Limit credit checks. ab 22 (Mendoza)
➤ no alcohol sales in self-checkout. ab 183 (Ma)
➤ damages for minimum wage violations. ab 240 (bonilla)
➤ protect Farmworkers from abuses. ab 243 (alejo)
➤ improve labor compliance. ab 436 (Solorio)
➤ Limit library contracting out. ab 438 (williams)
➤ stop wage theft. ab 469 (Swanson)
➤ avert municipal bankruptcies. ab 506 (wieckowski)
➤ prevailing wage for refuse drivers. ab 514 (hernández)
➤ Cancel disapproved contracts. ab 740 (blumenfield)
➤ Transparency in charter conversion. ab 1344 (feuer)
➤ Farmworker right to organize. Sb 126 (Steinberg)
➤ increase participation in initiatives. Sb 202 (hancock)
➤ Crackdown on misclassification. Sb 459 (Corbett)
➤ minimum training requirement. Sb 734 (deSaulnier)
➤ no strike damages. Sb 857 (lieu)
➤ prohibit local p.L.a. bans. Sb 922 (Steinberg)
labor SuPPorTed billS veToed
➤ include Classified in charter petition. ab 86 (Mendoza)
➤ empower child care providers. ab 101 (Pérez)
➤ Transparency in state contracting. ab 172 (eng)*
➤ no tax breaks for eliminating jobs. Sb 364 (yee)
➤ supercenter economic impact study. Sb 469 (vargas)
➤ Cap paycard fees. Sb 931 (evans)
labor oPPoSed bill Signed
➤ unlicensed administration of diastat. Sb 161 (huff)
* AB 172: Governor issued an executive order on transparency
page 4 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011
Supported bills 25. MiniMuM Training requireMenT.
Sb 734 (deSaulnier). Would help laid off workers gain the skills they need to find jobs by setting a minimum training requirement for programs funded by public dollars. ➤ Signed by governor
senate: 25-15 on 9/9/11 assembly: 51-27 on 9/9/11
26. no STrike daMageS. Sb 857 (lieu). Would promote better labor relations by prohibiting the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) from awarding strike damages against a union. ➤ Signed by governor
senate: 24-15 on 9/1/11 assembly: 51-27 on 8/25/11
27. ProhibiT loCal Pla banS. Sb 922 (Steinberg). Would preserve the option of project labor agreements (PLAs) when they are in the community’s best interest by barring local bans on PLAs. ➤ Signed by governor
senate: 24-14 on 9/9/11 assembly: 52-27 on 9/9/11
28. CaP PayCard feeS. Sb 931 (evans). Would pro-tect unbanked workers who get paid wages on payroll paycards from getting charged outrageous fees by the banks. ➤ veToed by governor
senate: 21-17 on 9/9/11assembly: 48-28 on 9/8/11
29. SToP ouTSourCing energy jobS. Sjr 13 (vargas). Would call on the US Department of Energy to reject Sempra Energy’s petition to outsource clean energy jobs by creating a transmission line across the Mexican border. does noT reQuire aCTion by goVernoR.
senate: 21-15 on 9/2/11 assembly: 50-27 on 9/9/11
Supported bills 13. SToP wage ThefT. ab 469 (Swanson).
Would crackdown on wage theft by giving workers more information about their jobs and employers and increasing penalties on employers who violate basic labor protections. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 21-14 on 8/31/11 assembly: 50-25 on 6/1/11
14. averT MuniCiPal bankruPTCieS. ab 506 (wieckowski). Would protect local workers and businesses by restricting access to municipal bankruptcy for cities and counties that do not meet specified criteria. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 28-10 on 9/9/11 assembly: 48-27 on 6/2/11
15. Prevailing wage for refuSe driverS. ab 514 (hernández). Would protect good jobs by clarifying that hauling refuse work is covered by the prevailing wage law. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 24-13 on 8/30/11 assembly: 50-27 on 9/2/11
16. CanCel diSaPProved ConTraCTS. ab 740 (blumenfield). Would end wasteful state contracting out where the State Personnel Board disapproves a contract. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 24-14 on 9/1/11 assembly: 54-19 on 5/19/11
17. no eZ Money To layoff workerS. ab 1278 (hill). Would require an employer relocat-ing to an Enterprise Zone (EZ) to offer jobs to existing employees and create net new jobs in order to claim EZ tax credits.
assembly: failed in jobs committee
18. TranSParenCy in CharTer ConverSion. ab 1344 (feuer). Would create a more transparent process for a general law city considering converting to a charter city. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 21-14 on 9/7/11 assembly: 78-1 on 9/8/11
Supported bills Senate 19 farMworker righT To organiZe.
Sb 126 (Steinberg). Would allow Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB) to grant union recognition if employer interference makes a fair election impossible. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 23-14 on 9/9/11 assembly: 50-28 on 9/8/11
20. inCreaSe ParTiCiPaTion in iniTiaTiveS. Sb 202 (hancock). Would allow greater voter partici-pation by moving all initiatives to the general election. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 23-15 on 9/10/11 assembly: 45-30 on 9/9/11
21. no Tax breakS for eliMinaTing jobS. Sb 364 (yee). Would create a money back guarantee for taxpayers—if a company gets tax credits to create jobs, then eliminates or offshores jobs, they have to pay a penalty to the state. ➤ veToed by The governor
senate: 22-15 on 9/2/11 assembly: 42-28 on 9/1/11
22. CraCkdown on MiSClaSSifiCaTion. Sb 459 (Corbett). Would help crackdown on misclassification of workers as independent contractors by creating new penalties, improved enforcement, and expanded liability. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 24-12 on 6/2/11 assembly: 51-26 on 9/7/11
23. SuPerCenTer eConoMiC iMPaCT STudy. Sb 469 (vargas): Would promote good jobs by requir-ing that an economic impact study showing the impact on existing jobs and worker wages be done by local government before a supercenter can be approved. ➤ veToed by The governor
senate: 21-14 on 5/31/11 assembly: 46-28 on 9/1/11
24. SToP unneCeSSary foreCloSureS.Sb 729 (leno). Would eliminate the practice of “dual tracking,” or foreclosing on a home while the family is in the loan modification process.
senate: failed in banking committee
California Labor Federation page 7page 6 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011
opposed bills assembly30. Two-Tier CoMMuniTy CollegeS.
ab 515 (brownley). Would create a two-tier pricing system for community college classes so that students who could pay more would get the classes they need.
senate: held in senate education committee assembly: 42-19 on 6/2/11
31. ColleCTive bargaining Takeaway. ab 961 (Mansoor). Would take away collective bargaining rights over matters related to retirement security from all school, court, and public agency workers.
assembly: failed in pers committee
Senate 32. unliCenSed adMiniSTraTion of
diaSTaT. Sb 161 (huff). Would allow school districts to ask unlicensed school employees to “volunteer” to provide medical assessment and administration of Diastat in the schools. ➤ Signed by The governor
senate: 32-4 on 6/2/11 assembly: 46-21 on 8/30/11
33. 8 hour day Takeaway. Sb 367 (dutton). Would allow employers with less than 25 employees to cut deals with individual workers to waive daily overtime.
senate: failed in labor committee
key labor billS: 2011
key labor billS: 2011
achadjian, katcho (R - SAn LuiS OBiSPO) 0% – – – – 0 29 0% 0%
alEjo, luiS (D - SALinAS) 93% – – – – 25 2 93% 93%
allEn, michaEl (D - SAntA ROSA) 97% 1 0 100% 100% 28 1 97% 97%
ammiano, tom (D - SAn FRAnCiSCO) – – – 100% 29 0 100% 96%
atkinS, toni (D - SAn DiegO) 93% – – – – 27 2 93% 93%
bEall, jim (D - SAn JOSe) – – – 100% 29 0 100% 96%
bErryhill, bill (R - StOCktOn) 3% – – – 50% 1 28 3% 16%
block, marty (D - SAn DiegO) 1 0 100% 67% 29 0 100% 96%
blumEnfiEld, bob (D - VAn nuyS) – – – – 29 0 100% 97%
bonilla, SuSan (D - MARtineZ) 96% – – – – 24 1 96% 96%
bradford, StEvEn (D - ingLeWOOD) 97% – – – 50% 28 1 97% 95%
brownlEy, julia (D - SAntA MOniCA) 93% – – – 75% 27 2 93% 98%
buchanan, joan (D - SAn RAMOn) 72% – – – 50% 21 8 72% 79%
butlEr, bEtSy (D - tORRAnCe) 97% – – – – 28 1 97% 97%
caldEron, charlES (D - WhittieR) 90% – – – 87% 26 3 90% 88%
camPoS, nora (D - SAn JOSe) 97% – – – – 28 1 97% 97%
cartEr, wilmEr amina (D - RiALtO) 89% – – – 80% 25 3 89% 92%
cEdillo, gilbErt (D - LOS AngeLeS) 89% – – – 96% 25 3 89% 94%
chESbro, wESlEy (D - euRekA) 93% – – – 94% 26 2 93% 92%
conway, conniE (R - ViSALiA) 3% – – – 20% 1 28 3% 13%
cook, Paul (R - yuCAiPA) 3% – – – – 1 28 3% 16%
daviS, mikE (D - LOS AngeLeS) 88% – – – 100% 23 3 88% 88%
dickinSon, rogEr (D - SACRAMentO) 97% – – – – 28 1 97% 97%
donnElly, tim (R - heSPeRiA) 3% – – – – 1 28 3% 3%
Eng, mikE (D - MOnteRey PARk) – – – 89% 29 0 100% 100%
fEuEr, mikE (D - LOS AngeLeS) 93% – – – 100% 27 2 93% 95%
flEtchEr, nathan (R - SAn DiegO) 14% – – – 0% 4 25 14% 16%
fong, Paul (D - MOuntAin VieW) – – – 100% 29 0 100% 99%
fuEntES, fEliPE (D - ARLetA) 93% – – – 100% 27 2 93% 90%
furutani, warrEn (D- LOng BeACh) 93% 1 0 100% 89% 25 2 93% 95%
gainES, bEth (R - ROSeViLLe)* 4% – – – – 1 26 4% 4%
galgiani, cathlEEn (D - tRACy) 69% – – – 0% 20 9 69% 68%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
*Beth gaines was elected to the Assembly on May 3, 2011. ** Jeff gorrell was called back to service in the navy Reserve on March 18, 2011
garrick, martin (R - CARLSBAD) 4% – – – 20% 1 25 4% 13%
gatto, mikE (D - BuRBAnk) 90% – – – – 26 3 90% 91%
gordon, richard (D - ReDWOOD City) 67% 1 0 100% 100% 19 10 66% 66%
gorEll, jEff (R - CAMARiLLO)** – – – – – – – – –
grovE, Shannon (R - BAkeRSFieLD) 3% 0 1 0% 0% 1 28 3% 3%
hagman, curt (R - DiAMOnD BAR) 3% – – – 0% 1 28 3% 12%
haldErman, linda (R - CLOViS) 7% – – – – 2 27 7% 7%
hall, iSadorE (D - LOS AngeLeS) 96% – – – 50% 25 1 96% 93%
harkEy, dianE (R - LAgunA nigueL) 3% 0 1 0% 0% 1 28 3% 8%
hayaShi, mary (D - hAyWARD) – – – 78% 29 0 100% 95%
hErnándEz, rogEr (D - BALDWin Pk) – – – – 28 0 100% 100%
hill, jErry (D - SO SAn FRAnCiSCO) 93% – – – 100% 27 2 93% 96%
hubEr, alySon (D - LODi) 55% – – – – 16 13 55% 67%
huESo, bEn (D - ChuLA ViStA) 97% 1 0 100% – 28 1 97% 97%
huffman, jarEd (D - SAn RAFAeL) 97% – – – 50% 28 1 97% 97%
jEffriES, kEvin (R - RiVeRSiDe) 4% – – – – 1 26 4% 13%
jonES, brian (D - LA MeSA) 7% – – – – 2 25 7% 7%
knight, StEvE (R - LAnCASteR) 3% – – – 25% 1 28 3% 11%
lara, ricardo (D - SOuth gAte) – – – – 29 0 100% 100%
loguE, dan (R - ChiCO) 3% – – – 0% 1 28 3% 11%
lowEnthal, bonniE (D - LOng BeACh) 97% – – – 100% 28 1 97% 96%
ma, fiona (D - SAn FRAnCiSCO) 96% 1 0 100% 91% 26 1 96% 97%
manSoor, allan (R - COStA MeSA) 3% 0 1 0% 0% 1 28 3% 3%
mEndoza, tony (D - ARteSiA) – – – – 29 0 100% 95%
millEr, jEff (R - ORAnge) 7% – – – 100% 2 27 7% 12%
mitchEll, holly (D - LOS AngeLeS) 90% – – – – 26 3 90% 90%
monning, william (D - SAntA CRuZ) 93% – – – 100% 27 2 93% 96%
morrEll, mikE (R - ReDLAnDS) 3% 0 1 0% 0% 1 28 3% 3%
nEStandE, brian (R - PALM DeSeRt) 14% – – – 0% 4 24 14% 19%
niElSEn, jim (R - BiggS) 4% – – – 50% 1 27 4% 17%
norby, chriS (R - BReA) 3% – – – 0% 1 28 3% 5%
olSEn, kriStin (R - MODeStO) 4% – – – – 1 27 4% 4%
page 8 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011
State assembly voting record Summary
State assembly voting record Summary
BLAnkS = LegiSLAtORS DiD nOt SeRVe On SCOReD COMMitteeS
BLAnkS = LegiSLAtORS DiD nOt SeRVe On SCOReD COMMitteeS
100%
100%
100%
100%
California Labor Federation page 9
2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe 2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe Votes with Votes against Cmte COMMittee Votes with Votes against Floor FLOOR Labor Labor % % Labor Labor % %
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS
2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe 2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe Votes with Votes against Cmte COMMittee Votes with Votes against Floor FLOOR Labor Labor % % Labor Labor % %
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS2011 committEE
& floor votE total
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS2011 committEE
& floor votE total
Pan, richard (D - SACRAMentO) 97% – – – – 28 1 97% 97%
PErEa, hEnry (D - FReSnO) 76% – – – – 22 7 76% 76%
PérEz, john (D - LOS AngeLeS) 97% – – – 100% 28 1 97% 95%
PérEz, manuEl v. (D - CAtheDRAL City) 86% 0 1 0% 75% 24 3 89% 91%
Portantino, anthony (D - PASADenA) 93% – – – 100% 27 2 93% 95%
Silva, jim (R - huntingtOn BeACh) 3% – – – 0% 1 28 3% 11%
SkinnEr, nancy (D - BeRkeLey) – – – 50% 29 0 100% 99%
Smyth, camEron (R - SAntA CLARitA) 7% – – – 0% 2 27 7% 14%
Solorio, joSE (D - SAntA AnA) 93% – – – 40% 27 2 93% 89%
SwanSon, Sandré (D - OAkLAnD) – – – 86% 29 0 100% 99%
torrES, norma (D - POMOnA) 83% – – – 100% 24 5 83% 88%
valadao, david (R - hAnFORD) 3% – – – – 1 28 3% 3%
wagnEr, donald (R - iRVine) 3% – – – – 1 28 3% 3%
wiEckowSki, bob (D - FReMOnt) 93% 1 0 100% 100% 27 2 93% 93%
williamS, daS (D - SAntA BARBARA) – – – – 29 0 100% 100%
yamada, mariko (D - DAViS) – – – – 29 0 100% 97%
alquiSt, ElainE (D - SAntA CLARA) 96% 1 0 100% 92% 22 1 96% 95%
andErSon, joEl (R - MuRRietA) 0% 0 1 0% 0% 0 27 0% 11%
bErryhill, tom (R - FReSnO) 4% – – – 0% 1 25 4% 15%
blakESlEE, Sam (R - SAntA MARiA) 7% 0 2 0% 0% 2 25 7% 14%
caldEron, ron (D - MOnteBeLLO) 67% – – – 64% 18 9 67% 84%
cannElla, anthony (R - MeRCeD) 0% – – – – 0 27 0% 0%
corbEtt, EllEn (D - SAn LeAnDRO) – – – 97% 27 0 100% 99%
corrEa, lou (D - SAntA AnA) 52% – – – 79% 14 13 52% 77%
dE lEÓn, kEvin (D - LOS AngeLeS) 96% 1 0 100% 100% 25 1 96% 94%
dESaulniEr, mark (D - COnCORD) 2 0 100% 100% 27 0 100% 100%
dutton, bob (R - inLAnD eMPiRe) 4% – – – 9% 1 26 4% 8%
EmmErSon, bill (R - PALM DeSeRt) 4% – – – 0% 1 26 4% 10%
EvanS, norEEn (D - SAntA ROSA) 96% 1 0 100% 100% 26 1 96% 94%
fullEr, jEan (R - BAkeRSFieLD) 0% – – – 0% 0 27 0% 13%
gainES, tEd (R - FAiR OAkS) 4% – – – 0% 1 26 4% 12%
hancock, loni (D - OAkLAnD) – – – 100% 27 0 100% 97%
harman, tom (R - ORAnge) 0% – – – 25% 0 25 0% 8%
hErnandEz, Ed (D - LOS AngeLeS) 86% 1 0 100% 88% 23 4 85% 95%
huff, bob (R - gLenDORA) 4% – – – 0% 1 26 4% 8%
kEhoE, chriStinE (D - SAn DiegO) 96% 1 0 100% 100% 26 1 96% 98%
la malfa, doug (R - gRASS VALLey) 0% – – – – 0 27 0% 6%
lEno, mark (D - SAn FRAnCiSCO) 1 0 100% 94% 25 0 100% 100%
liEu, tEd (D - LOng BeACh) 93% 1 0 100% 100% 25 2 93% 94%
liu, carol (D - PASADenA) 82% 1 0 100% 84% 22 5 81% 91%
lowEnthal, alan (D - LOng BeACh) 93% – – – 100% 25 2 93% 97%
nEgrEtE mclEod, gloria (D - ChinO) 96% – – – 93% 25 1 96% 93%
Padilla, alEx (D - PACOiMA) 93% 1 1 50% 50% 26 1 96% 89%
PavlEy, fran (D - SAntA MOniCA) 96% – – – 100% 26 1 96% 97%
PricE, currEn (D - ingLeWOOD) 89% – – – 75% 24 3 89% 92%
rubio, michaEl (D - ShAFteR) 75% 0 1 0% 0% 21 6 78% 78%
runnEr, Sharon (R - AnteLOPe VALLey) 4% 0 1 0% 0% 1 22 4% 8%
Simitian, joE (D - PALO ALtO) 88% – – – 97% 22 3 88% 93%
StEinbErg, darrEll (D - SACRAMentO) 96% – – – 100% 26 1 96% 98%
Strickland, tony (D -thOuSAnD OAkS) 0% 0 1 0% 0% 0 27 0% 10%
vargaS, juan (D - SAn DiegO) 93% 0 1 0% 96% 26 1 96% 98%
waltErS, mimi (R - tuStin) 0% 0 1 0% 0% 0 23 0% 5%
wolk, loiS (D - LinDen) 79% 1 0 100% 75% 21 6 78% 86%
wright, rodErick (R - LOS AngeLeS) 63% – – – 100% 17 10 63% 86%
wyland, mark (R - eSCOnDiDO) 4% 0 1 0% 11% 1 26 4% 8%
yEE, lElanD (D - SAn FRAnCiSCO/ 86% 1 0 100% 98% 23 4 85% 97%
2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe 2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe Votes with Votes against Cmte COMMittee Votes with Votes against Floor FLOOR Labor Labor % % Labor Labor % %
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS2011 committEE
& floor votE total
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS
2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe 2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe Votes with Votes against Cmte COMMittee Votes with Votes against Floor FLOOR Labor Labor % % Labor Labor % %
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS2011 committEE
& floor votE total
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS
2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe 2011 2011 2011 LiFetiMe Votes with Votes against Cmte COMMittee Votes with Votes against Floor FLOOR Labor Labor % % Labor Labor % %
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS2011 committEE
& floor votE total
COMMittee VOteS FLOOR VOteS
SAn MAteO)
100%
100%
100%
100%
California Labor Federation page 11page 10 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011
BLAnkS = LegiSLAtORS DiD nOt SeRVe On SCOReD COMMitteeS
BLAnkS = LegiSLAtORS DiD nOt SeRVe On SCOReD COMMitteeS
State assembly voting record Summary
State Senate voting record Summary
State Senate voting record Summary
BLAnkS = LegiSLAtORS DiD nOt SeRVe On SCOReD COMMitteeS
100%
100%
100%
100%
page 12 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011 California Labor Federation page 13
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn
ab 2
2: L
imit
cred
it ch
ecks
ab 5
2: h
ealth
insu
ranc
e ra
te
regu
latio
n ab
86:
incl
ude
Clas
sifie
d in
c
harte
r pet
ition
ab 1
01: e
mpo
wer
chi
ld c
are
pro
vide
rsab
172
: tra
nspa
renc
y in
sta
te
con
tract
ing
ab 1
83: n
o al
coho
l sal
es in
se
lf-ch
ecko
ut
ab 2
40: D
amag
es fo
r min
imum
w
age
viol
atio
nsab
243
: Pro
tect
Far
mw
orke
rs
from
abu
ses
ab 3
50: W
orke
r ret
entio
n fo
r co
ntra
ct w
orke
rsab
375
: Wor
kers
’ com
pens
atio
n p
resu
mpt
ion
for n
urse
sab
436
: im
prov
e la
bor c
ompl
ianc
e ab
438
: Lim
it lib
rary
con
tract
ing
out ab
469
: Sto
p w
age
thef
t ab
506
: Ave
rt m
unic
ipal
ba
nkru
ptci
es
SuPPort
2011 totalS
VOteS with
labor
VOteS againSt labor
nOt VOting %ab
514
: Pre
vaili
ng w
age
for
refu
se d
river
sab
740
: Can
cel d
isap
prov
ed
con
tract
sab
134
4: t
rans
pare
ncy
in c
harte
r
con
vers
ion
Sb 1
26: F
arm
wor
ker r
ight
to o
rgan
izeSb
202
: inc
reas
e pa
rtici
patio
n in
initi
ativ
esSb
364
: no
tax
brea
ks fo
r e
limin
atin
g jo
bsSb
459
: Cra
ckdo
wn
on
mis
clas
sific
atio
nSb
469
: Sup
erce
nter
eco
nom
ic
impa
ct S
tudy
Sb 7
34: M
inim
um tr
aini
ng
requ
irem
ent
Sb 8
57: n
o st
rike
dam
ages
Sb 9
22: P
rohi
bit l
ocal
PLA
ban
sSb
931
: Cap
Pay
card
fees
Sjr
13: S
top
outs
ourc
ing
ener
gy jo
bs
ab 5
15: t
wo-
tier c
omm
unity
c
olle
ges
Sb 1
61: u
nlic
ense
d ad
min
istra
tion
of D
iast
at
SuPPort oPPoSE
achadjian, katcho (R - SAn LuiS OBiSPO) AD 33 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 29 0 0%
alEjo, luiS (D - SALinAS) AD 28 nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 25 2 2 93%
allEn, michaEl (D - SAntA ROSA) AD 07 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 28 1 0 97%
ammiano, tom (D - SAn FRAnCiSCO) AD 13 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
atkinS, toni (D - SAn DiegO) AD 76 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ 27 2 0 93%
bEall, jim (D - SAn JOSe) AD 24 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
bErryhill, bill (R - StOCktOn) AD 26 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
block, marty (D - SAn DiegO) AD 78 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
blumEnfiEld, bob (D - VAn nuyS) AD 40 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
bonilla, SuSan (D - MARtineZ) AD 11 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ nV ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 24 1 4 96%
bradford, StEvEn (D - ingLeWOOD) AD 51 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 28 1 0 97%
brownlEy, julia (D - SAntA MOniCA) AD 41 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 27 2 0 93%
buchanan, joan (D - SAn RAMOn) AD 15 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ 21 8 0 72%
butlEr, bEtSy (D - tORRAnCe) AD 53 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 28 1 0 97%
caldEron, charlES (D - WhittieR) AD 58 ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 26 3 0 90%
camPoS, nora (D - SAn JOSe) AD 23 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 28 1 0 97%
cartEr, wilmEr amina (D - RiALtO) AD 62 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 25 3 1 89%
cEdillo, gilbErt (D - LOS AngeLeS) AD 45 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 25 3 1 89%
chESbro, wESlEy (D - euRekA) AD 01 ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 26 2 1 93%
conway, conniE (R - ViSALiA) AD 34 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
State assembly floor votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32
*Beth gaines was elected to the Assembly on May 3, 2011 ** Jeff gorrell was called back to service in the navy Reserve on
March 18, 2011page 14 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011 California Labor Federation page 15
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn
ab 2
2: L
imit
cred
it ch
ecks
ab 5
2: h
ealth
insu
ranc
e ra
te
regu
latio
n ab
86:
incl
ude
Clas
sifie
d in
c
harte
r pet
ition
ab 1
01: e
mpo
wer
chi
ld c
are
pro
vide
rsab
172
: tra
nspa
renc
y in
sta
te
con
tract
ing
ab 1
83: n
o al
coho
l sal
es in
se
lf-ch
ecko
ut
ab 2
40: D
amag
es fo
r min
imum
w
age
viol
atio
nsab
243
: Pro
tect
Far
mw
orke
rs
from
abu
ses
ab 3
50: W
orke
r ret
entio
n fo
r co
ntra
ct w
orke
rsab
375
: Wor
kers
’ com
pens
atio
n p
resu
mpt
ion
for n
urse
sab
436
: im
prov
e la
bor c
ompl
ianc
e ab
438
: Lim
it lib
rary
con
tract
ing
out ab
469
: Sto
p w
age
thef
t ab
506
: Ave
rt m
unic
ipal
ba
nkru
ptci
es
SuPPort
2011 totalS
VOteS with
labor
VOteS againSt labor
nOt VOting %ab
514
: Pre
vaili
ng w
age
for
refu
se d
river
sab
740
: Can
cel d
isap
prov
ed
con
tract
sab
134
4: t
rans
pare
ncy
in c
harte
r
con
vers
ion
Sb 1
26: F
arm
wor
ker r
ight
to o
rgan
izeSb
202
: inc
reas
e pa
rtici
patio
n in
initi
ativ
esSb
364
: no
tax
brea
ks fo
r e
limin
atin
g jo
bsSb
459
: Cra
ckdo
wn
on
mis
clas
sific
atio
nSb
469
: Sup
erce
nter
eco
nom
ic
impa
ct S
tudy
Sb 7
34: M
inim
um tr
aini
ng
requ
irem
ent
Sb 8
57: n
o st
rike
dam
ages
Sb 9
22: P
rohi
bit l
ocal
PLA
ban
sSb
931
: Cap
Pay
card
fees
Sjr
13: S
top
outs
ourc
ing
ener
gy jo
bs
ab 5
15: t
wo-
tier c
omm
unity
c
olle
ges
Sb 1
61: u
nlic
ense
d ad
min
istra
tion
of D
iast
at
SuPPort oPPoSE
cook, Paul (R - yuCAiPA) AD 65 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
daviS, mikE (D - LOS AngeLeS) AD 48 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 23 3 3 88%
dickinSon, rogEr (D - SACRAMentO) AD 09 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 28 1 0 97%
donnElly, tim (R - heSPeRiA) AD 59 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
Eng, mikE (D - MOnteRey PARk) AD 49 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
fEuEr, mikE (D - LOS AngeLeS) AD 42 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 27 2 0 93%
flEtchEr, nathan (R - SAn DiegO) AD 75 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 25 0 14%
fong, Paul (D - MOuntAin VieW) AD 22 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
fuEntES, fEliPE (D - ARLetA) AD 39 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 27 2 0 93%
furutani, warrEn (D- LOng BeACh) AD 55 ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 25 2 2 93%
gainES, bEth (R - ROSeViLLe) AD 04* ✘ ✘ — ✘ ✘ ✘ — ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 26 0 4%
galgiani, cathlEEn (D - tRACy) AD 17 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 20 9 0 69%
garrick, martin (R - CARLSBAD) AD 74 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 25 3 4%
gatto, mikE (D - BuRBAnk) AD 43 ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 26 3 0 90%
gordon, richard (D - ReDWOOD City) AD 21 ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 19 10 0 66%
gorEll, jEff (R - CAMARiLLO) AD 37** nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV nV 0 0 29 —
grovE, Shannon (R - BAkeRSFieLD) AD 32 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
hagman, curt (R - DiAMOnD BAR) AD 60 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
haldErman, linda (R - CLOViS) AD 29 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ 2 27 0 7%
hall, iSadorE (D - LOS AngeLeS) AD 52 ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✘ 25 1 3 96%
State assembly floor votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32
page 16 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011 California Labor Federation page 17
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn
ab 2
2: L
imit
cred
it ch
ecks
ab 5
2: h
ealth
insu
ranc
e ra
te
regu
latio
n ab
86:
incl
ude
Clas
sifie
d in
c
harte
r pet
ition
ab 1
01: e
mpo
wer
chi
ld c
are
pro
vide
rsab
172
: tra
nspa
renc
y in
sta
te
con
tract
ing
ab 1
83: n
o al
coho
l sal
es in
se
lf-ch
ecko
ut
ab 2
40: D
amag
es fo
r min
imum
w
age
viol
atio
nsab
243
: Pro
tect
Far
mw
orke
rs
from
abu
ses
ab 3
50: W
orke
r ret
entio
n fo
r co
ntra
ct w
orke
rsab
375
: Wor
kers
’ com
pens
atio
n p
resu
mpt
ion
for n
urse
sab
436
: im
prov
e la
bor c
ompl
ianc
e ab
438
: Lim
it lib
rary
con
tract
ing
out ab
469
: Sto
p w
age
thef
t ab
506
: Ave
rt m
unic
ipal
ba
nkru
ptci
es
SuPPort
2011 totalS
VOteS with
labor
VOteS againSt labor
nOt VOting %ab
514
: Pre
vaili
ng w
age
for
refu
se d
river
sab
740
: Can
cel d
isap
prov
ed
con
tract
sab
134
4: t
rans
pare
ncy
in c
harte
r
con
vers
ion
Sb 1
26: F
arm
wor
ker r
ight
to o
rgan
izeSb
202
: inc
reas
e pa
rtici
patio
n in
initi
ativ
esSb
364
: no
tax
brea
ks fo
r e
limin
atin
g jo
bsSb
459
: Cra
ckdo
wn
on
mis
clas
sific
atio
nSb
469
: Sup
erce
nter
eco
nom
ic
impa
ct S
tudy
Sb 7
34: M
inim
um tr
aini
ng
requ
irem
ent
Sb 8
57: n
o st
rike
dam
ages
Sb 9
22: P
rohi
bit l
ocal
PLA
ban
sSb
931
: Cap
Pay
card
fees
Sjr
13: S
top
outs
ourc
ing
ener
gy jo
bs
ab 5
15: t
wo-
tier c
omm
unity
c
olle
ges
Sb 1
61: u
nlic
ense
d ad
min
istra
tion
of D
iast
at
SuPPort oPPoSE
harkEy, dianE (R - LAgunA nigueL) AD 73 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
hayaShi, mary (D - hAyWARD) AD 18 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
hErnándEz, rogEr (D - BALDWin PARk) AD 57 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 28 0 1 100%
hill, jErry (D - SOuth SAn FRAnCiSCO) AD 19 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 27 2 0 93%
hubEr, alySon (D - LODi) AD 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ 16 13 0 55%
huESo, bEn (D - ChuLA ViStA) AD 79 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 28 1 0 97%
huffman, jarEd (D - SAn RAFAeL) AD 06 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 28 1 0 97%
jEffriES, kEvin (R - RiVeRSiDe) AD 66 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 26 2 4%
jonES, brian (D - LA MeSA) AD 77 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 25 2 7%
knight, StEvE (R - LAnCASteR) AD 36 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
lara, ricardo (D - SOuth gAte) AD 50 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
loguE, dan (R - ChiCO) AD 03 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
lowEnthal, bonniE (D - LOng BeACh) AD 54 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 28 1 0 97%
ma, fiona (D - SAn FRAnCiSCO) AD 12 nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 26 1 2 96%
manSoor, allan (R - COStA MeSA) AD 68 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
mEndoza, tony (D - ARteSiA) AD 56 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
millEr, jEff (R - ORAnge) AD 71 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ 2 27 0 7%
mitchEll, holly (D - LOS AngeLeS) AD 47 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 26 3 0 90%
monning, william (D - SAntA CRuZ) AD 27 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ 27 2 0 93%
morrEll, mikE (R - ReDLAnDS) AD 63 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
State assembly floor votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32
page 18 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011 California Labor Federation page 19
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn
ab 2
2: L
imit
cred
it ch
ecks
ab 5
2: h
ealth
insu
ranc
e ra
te
regu
latio
n ab
86:
incl
ude
Clas
sifie
d in
c
harte
r pet
ition
ab 1
01: e
mpo
wer
chi
ld c
are
pro
vide
rsab
172
: tra
nspa
renc
y in
sta
te
con
tract
ing
ab 1
83: n
o al
coho
l sal
es in
se
lf-ch
ecko
ut
ab 2
40: D
amag
es fo
r min
imum
w
age
viol
atio
nsab
243
: Pro
tect
Far
mw
orke
rs
from
abu
ses
ab 3
50: W
orke
r ret
entio
n fo
r co
ntra
ct w
orke
rsab
375
: Wor
kers
’ com
pens
atio
n p
resu
mpt
ion
for n
urse
sab
436
: im
prov
e la
bor c
ompl
ianc
e ab
438
: Lim
it lib
rary
con
tract
ing
out ab
469
: Sto
p w
age
thef
t ab
506
: Ave
rt m
unic
ipal
ba
nkru
ptci
es
SuPPort
2011 totalS
VOteS with
labor
VOteS againSt labor
nOt VOting %ab
514
: Pre
vaili
ng w
age
for
refu
se d
river
sab
740
: Can
cel d
isap
prov
ed
con
tract
sab
134
4: t
rans
pare
ncy
in c
harte
r
con
vers
ion
Sb 1
26: F
arm
wor
ker r
ight
to o
rgan
izeSb
202
: inc
reas
e pa
rtici
patio
n in
initi
ativ
esSb
364
: no
tax
brea
ks fo
r e
limin
atin
g jo
bsSb
459
: Cra
ckdo
wn
on
mis
clas
sific
atio
nSb
469
: Sup
erce
nter
eco
nom
ic
impa
ct S
tudy
Sb 7
34: M
inim
um tr
aini
ng
requ
irem
ent
Sb 8
57: n
o st
rike
dam
ages
Sb 9
22: P
rohi
bit l
ocal
PLA
ban
sSb
931
: Cap
Pay
card
fees
Sjr
13: S
top
outs
ourc
ing
ener
gy jo
bs
ab 5
15: t
wo-
tier c
omm
unity
c
olle
ges
Sb 1
61: u
nlic
ense
d ad
min
istra
tion
of D
iast
at
SuPPort oPPoSE
nEStandE, brian (R - PALM DeSeRt) AD 64 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 4 24 1 14%
niElSEn, jim (R - BiggS) AD 02 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 27 1 4%
norby, chriS (R - BReA) AD 72 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
olSEn, kriStin (R - MODeStO) AD 25 ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 27 1 4%
Pan, richard (D - SACRAMentO) AD 05 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 28 1 0 97%
PErEa, hEnry (D - FReSnO) AD 31 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 22 7 0 76%
PérEz, john (D - LOS AngeLeS) AD 46 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 28 1 0 97%
PérEz, manuEl V. (D - CAtheDRAL City) AD 80 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ 24 3 2 89%
Portantino, anthony (D - PASADenA) AD 44 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ 27 2 0 93%
Silva, jim (R - huntingtOn BeACh) AD 67 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
SkinnEr, nancy (D - BeRkeLey) AD 14 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
Smyth, camEron (R - SAntA CLARitA) AD 38 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 27 0 7%
Solorio, joSE (D - SAntA AnA) AD 69 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 27 2 0 93%
SwanSon, Sandré (D - OAkLAnD) AD 16 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
torrES, norma (D - POMOnA) AD 61 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ 24 5 0 83%
valadao, david (R - hAnFORD) AD 30 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
wagnEr, donald (R - iRVine) AD 70 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 28 0 3%
wiEckowSki, bob (D - FReMOnt) AD 20 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 27 2 0 93%
williamS, daS (D - SAntA BARBARA) AD 35 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
yamada, mariko (D - DAViS) AD 08 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 29 0 0 100%
State assembly floor votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 32
page 20 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011 California Labor Federation page 21
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 32
SuPPort
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 32
SuPPort
2011 totalS
VOteS with
labor
VOteS againSt labor
nOt VOting %
alquiSt, ElainE (D - SAntA CLARA) SD 13) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ nV ✘ 22 1 4 96%
andErSon, joEl (R - MuRRietA) SD 36 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 27 0 0%
bErryhill, tom (R - FReSnO) SD 14 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 25 1 4%
blakESlEE, Sam (R - SAntA MARiA) SD 15 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 2 25 0 7%
caldEron, ron (D - MOnteBeLLO) SD 30 ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ 18 9 0 67%
cannElla, anthony (R - MeRCeD) SD 12 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 27 0 0%
corbEtt, EllEn (D - SAn LeAnDRO) SD 10 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 27 0 0 100%
corrEa, lou (D - SAntA AnA) SD 34 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ 14 13 0 52%
dE lEÓn, kEvin (D - LOS AngeLeS) SD 22 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 25 1 1 96%
dESaulniEr, mark (D - COnCORD) SD 7 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 27 0 0 100%
dutton, bob (R - inLAnD eMPiRe) SD 31 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 26 0 4%
EmmErSon, bill (R - PALM DeSeRt SD 37) ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 26 0 4%
EvanS, norEEn (D - SAntA ROSA) SD 02 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 26 1 0 96%
fullEr, jEan (R - BAkeRSFieLD) SD 18 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 27 0 0%
gainES, tEd (R - FAiR OAkS) SD 01 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 26 0 4%
hancock, loni (D - OAkLAnD) SD 09 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 27 0 0 100%
harman, tom (R - ORAnge) SD 35 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 25 2 0%
hErnandEz, Ed (D - LOS AngeLeS) SD 24 ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ 23 4 0 85%
huff, bob (R - gLenDORA) SB 29 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 26 0 4%
kEhoE, chriStinE (D - SAn DiegO) SD 39 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 26 1 0 96%
State Senate floor votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
ab 2
2: L
imit
cred
it ch
ecks
ab 8
6: in
clud
e Cl
assi
fied
in
cha
rter p
etiti
on ab
101
: em
pow
er c
hild
car
e p
rovi
ders
ab 1
72: t
rans
pare
ncy
in s
tate
c
ontra
ctin
g ab
183
: no
alco
hol s
ales
in
self-
chec
kout
ab 2
40: D
amag
es fo
r min
imum
w
age
viol
atio
nsab
243
: Pro
tect
Far
mw
orke
rs
from
abu
ses
ab 3
50: W
orke
r ret
entio
n fo
r co
ntra
ct w
orke
rsab
375
: Wor
kers
’ com
pens
atio
n p
resu
mpt
ion
for n
urse
sab
436
: im
prov
e la
bor c
ompl
ianc
eab
438
: Lim
it lib
rary
con
tract
ing
out
ab 4
69: S
top
wag
e th
eft
ab 5
06: A
vert
mun
icip
al
bank
rupt
cies
ab 5
14: P
reva
iling
wag
e fo
r re
fuse
driv
ers
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
Sb 1
26: F
arm
wor
ker r
ight
to
org
anize
Sb 2
02: i
ncre
ase
parti
cipa
tion
in in
itiat
ives
Sb 3
64: n
o ta
x br
eaks
for
elim
inat
ing
jobs
ab 7
40: C
ance
l dis
appr
oved
c
ontra
cts
Sb 4
59: C
rack
dow
n on
m
iscl
assi
ficat
ion
Sb 4
69: S
uper
cent
er e
cono
mic
impa
ct S
tudy
Sb 8
57: n
o st
rike
dam
ages
ab 1
344:
tra
nspa
renc
y in
cha
rter
con
vers
ion
Sb 7
34: M
inim
um tr
aini
ng
requ
irem
ent
Sb 9
22: P
rohi
bit l
ocal
PLA
ban
sSb
931
: Cap
pay
card
fees
Sjr
13: S
top
outs
ourc
ing
ener
gy jo
bs Sb 1
61: u
nlic
ense
d ad
min
istra
tion
of D
iast
at
oPPoSE
page 22 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011 California Labor Federation page 23
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 32
SuPPort
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 32
SuPPort
2011 totalS
VOteS with
labor
VOteS againSt labor
nOt VOting %
la malfa, doug (R - gRASS VALLey) SD 04 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 27 0 0%
lEno, mark (D - SAn FRAnCiSCO) SD 03 ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 25 0 2 100%
liEu, tEd (D - LOng BeACh) SD 28 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 25 2 0 93%
liu, carol (D - PASADenA) SD 21 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 22 5 0 81%
lowEnthal, alan (D - LOng BeACh) SD 27 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 25 2 0 93%
nEgrEtE mclEod, gloria (D - ChinO) SD 32 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 25 1 1 96%
Padilla, alEx (D - PACOiMA) SD 20 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 26 1 0 96%
PavlEy, fran (D - SAntA MOniCA) SD 23 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ 26 1 0 96%
PricE, currEn (D - ingLeWOOD) SD 26 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ 24 3 0 89%
rubio, michaEl (D - ShAFteR) SD 16 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 21 6 0 78%
runnEr, Sharon (R - AnteLOPe VALLey) SD 17 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV 1 22 4 4%
Simitian, joE (D - PALO ALtO) SD 11 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ nV ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 22 3 2 88%
StEinbErg, darrEll (D - SACRAMentO) SD 06 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 26 1 0 96%
Strickland, tony (D - thOuSAnD OAkS) SD 19 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 27 0 0%
vargaS, juan (D - SAn DiegO)SD 40 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 26 1 0 96%
waltErS, mimi (R - tuStin) SD 33 ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ nV ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 0 23 4 0%
wolk, loiS (D - LinDen) SD 05 ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ 21 6 0 78%
wright, rodErick (D - LOS AngeLeS) SD 25 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ 17 10 0 63%
wyland, mark (R - eSCOnDiDO) SD 38 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ 1 26 0 4%
yEE, lEland (D - SAn FRAn/ SAn MAteO) SD 0) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ 23 4 0 85%
State Senate floor votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
ab 2
2: L
imit
cred
it ch
ecks
ab 8
6: in
clud
e Cl
assi
fied
in
cha
rter p
etiti
on ab
101
: em
pow
er c
hild
car
e p
rovi
ders
ab 1
72: t
rans
pare
ncy
in s
tate
c
ontra
ctin
g ab
183
: no
alco
hol s
ales
in
self-
chec
kout
ab 2
40: D
amag
es fo
r min
imum
w
age
viol
atio
nsab
243
: Pro
tect
Far
mw
orke
rs
from
abu
ses
ab 3
50: W
orke
r ret
entio
n fo
r co
ntra
ct w
orke
rsab
375
: Wor
kers
’ com
pens
atio
n p
resu
mpt
ion
for n
urse
sab
436
: im
prov
e la
bor c
ompl
ianc
eab
438
: Lim
it lib
rary
con
tract
ing
out
ab 4
69: S
top
wag
e th
eft
ab 5
06: A
vert
mun
icip
al
bank
rupt
cies
ab 5
14: P
reva
iling
wag
e fo
r re
fuse
driv
ers
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
Sb 1
26: F
arm
wor
ker r
ight
to
org
anize
Sb 2
02: i
ncre
ase
parti
cipa
tion
in in
itiat
ives
Sb 3
64: n
o ta
x br
eaks
for
elim
inat
ing
jobs
ab 7
40: C
ance
l dis
appr
oved
c
ontra
cts
Sb 4
59: C
rack
dow
n on
m
iscl
assi
ficat
ion
Sb 4
69: S
uper
cent
er e
cono
mic
impa
ct S
tudy
Sb 8
57: n
o st
rike
dam
ages
ab 1
344:
tra
nspa
renc
y in
cha
rter
con
vers
ion
Sb 7
34: M
inim
um tr
aini
ng
requ
irem
ent
Sb 9
22: P
rohi
bit l
ocal
PLA
ban
sSb
931
: Cap
pay
card
fees
Sjr
13: S
top
outs
ourc
ing
ener
gy jo
bs Sb 1
61: u
nlic
ense
d ad
min
istra
tion
of D
iast
at
oPPoSE
California Labor Federation page 25page 24 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011
A FORCE FOR PROGRESS 2010
key labor billsA FORCE FOR PROGRESS 2010
key labor billsA FORCE FOR PROGRESS 2010
key labor billsA FORCE FOR PROGRESS 2010
key labor bills
Senate Committee votes
31
assembly Public Employees, retirement and Social Security
allEn, michaEl (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
furutani, warrEn (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
harkEy, dianE (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
ma, fiona (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
manSoor, allan (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
wiEckowSki, bob (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
totalS✔ ✘
ab 9
61: C
olle
ctiv
e ba
rgai
ning
take
away
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn % 17
assembly jobs, Economic development and the Economy
bEall, jim (D) nV – – –
block, marty (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
gordon, richard (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
grovE, Shannon (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
huESo, bEn (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
morrEll, mikE (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
PérEz, v. manuEl (D) ✘ 0 1 0%
totalS✔ ✘
ab 1
278:
no
eZ m
oney
to la
yoff
wor
kers
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn %
teAMSteR LOCAL 853 MeMBeR, DOnALD DugyAWi teStiFieS in
SuPPORt OF AB 1278. thAt BiLL WOuLD hAVe PReVenteD hiS
COMPAny, VWR, FROM getting StAte enteRPRiSe ZOne tAx
CReDitS FOR ReLOCAting AnD LAying OFF theiR LOngtiMe
WORkeRS.
SB 729 WOuLD hAVe SAVeD MAny FAMiLieS FROM LOSing theiR
hOMeS AnD heLPeD StABiLiZe hOMe VALueS By eLiMinAting
the PRACtiCe OF FOReCLOSing On A hOMe WhiLe A FAMiLy iS in
the LOAn MODiFiCAtiOn PROCeSS.
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
24 2
blakESlEE, Sam (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
EvanS, norEEn (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
kEhoE, chriStinE (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
liu, carol (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
Padilla, alEx (D) nV _ _ _
vargaS, juan (D) ✘ 0 1 0%
waltErS, mimi (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
alquiSt, ElainE (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
andErSon, joEl (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
blakESlEE, Sam (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
dE lEÓn, kEvin (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
dESaulniEr, mark (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
hErnandEz, Ed (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
rubio, michaEl (D) nV – – –
Strickland, tony (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
wolk, loiS (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
totalStotalS
✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sb 7
29: S
top
unne
cess
ary
Fore
clos
ures
ab 5
2: h
ealth
insu
ranc
e Ra
te R
egul
atio
n
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 3-5 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn %%
Senate banking, finance and insurance committee
Senate health committee
assembly Committee votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
33
Senate labor and industrial relations committee
dESaulniEr, mark (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
lEno, mark (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
liEu, tEd (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
Padilla, alEx (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
runnEr, Sharon (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
wyland, mark (R) ✘ 0 1 0%
yEE, lEland (D) ✔ 1 0 100%
totalS✔ ✘
Sb 3
67: 8
-hou
r day
take
away
key FOR BiLLS See PAgeS 5-7 FOR DeSCRiPtiOn
page 26 Labor’s Legislative Scorecard 2011
lobbying notes
%
Senate Committee votes
✔ = votES with labor ✘ = votES againSt labor nv = not voting (excused Absence)
lobbying notes