Date post: | 18-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | cecilia-carson |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Low-energy EM group :status and plans
Geant Low Energy EM Physics working group
19-20 January 2009CERN
2
Content Working-group reorganisation
Highlights since 2007 Review
Workplan 2009 2010-2012
I – Working group reorganisation since July 2008
4
coordinator : S. Incerti (IN2P3/CENBG)
two steering-board representatives : G. Cuttone (INFN/LNS) G. Montarou (IN2P3/LPCC)
contains 18 members who are members of the Geant4 collaboration
ANSTO (Australia), CERN, CNSTN (Tunisia), FAMAF (Argentina), IN2P3 (France), INFN (Italy), Karolinska (Sweden), ESA (The Netherlands)
in collaboration with 18 « external » members having their own expertise on specific items/activity they are not yet members of the Geant4 collaboration they will have the possibility to join the Geant4 collaboration after
contribution to the low energy EM working group
Re-organisation
5
6 « mini » working groups Low-energy EM processes
coordinator : S. Incerti (IN2P3/CENBG)
Debugging of existing models coordinator : G. Santin (ESA/ESTEC)
Computing performance coordinator : N. Karakatsanis (National Tech. Univ. of Athens)
Testing coordinator : P. Guèye (Jefferson Lab/Hampton U.)
Validation coordinator : P. Cirrone (INFN/LNS)
Documentation coordinator : C. Zacharatou (Copenhagen University Hospital )
6
A new web site accessible to users directly from Geant4 web site based on Twiki at CERN https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Geant4/LowEnergyElectromagneticPhysicsWorki
ngGroup
II - Highlights since 2007 Review
New Physics processes and models Ion ionisation model (ICRU’73) Doppler broadening PIXE ionisation cross sections Geant4-DNA processes for microdosimetry
Software design migration for convergence Low-energy / Standard EM
Livermore photon processes Penelope processes
Software performance
Physics processes and models
Note
The plots shown do not contain reference data.Validation will be addressed during the second low energy talk.
1) New ion ionisation model
G4IonParametrisedLossModel: a new low-energy electromagnetic model for ions
G4IonParametrisedLossModel is a new stopping power model for ions, currently under developement
Close collaboration between Low-Energy and Standard Electromagnetic group
Model is part of the Low-Energy package, but follows the Standard interfaces
Designated for use with the G4ionIonisation process A prototype version of the model was included in the December 2008
release of Geant4 Currently in validation phase
Allows to plug in electronic stopping power tables: in its default configuration the model utilizes ICRU 73 data
The ICRU 73 report provides stopping power tabulations for ions with atomic numbers ranging from 3 to 18, as well as for iron ions, covering many elemental materials and compounds relevant for various
areas of application Stopping data for ion-material combinations not included in the ICRU 73
report are computed by applying a scaling procedure
On behalf of A.
Lechner
G4IonParametrisedLossModel: a new low-energy electromagnetic model for ions
The new approach is expected to improve accuracy of ion loss description in Geant4
Previous models in Geant4 derive ion stopping powers by scaling proton or helium data (ICRU 49, NIST) using an effective charge approximation
First tests: For some ion-target couples, differences are observed between new and old model in the prediction of the ion range (see Bragg peak in figure below)
New model is expected to improve accuracy, where the effective charge approach is known to have deficiencies
Fig.: Energy deposition as a function of depth for Ar-40
ions (135 MeV per nucleon)impinging on aluminum oxide:Comparison of results derived
with G4IonParametrisedLossModel(ICRU 73) and G4BraggIonModel
(ICRU 49 + effective charge approach). Preliminary results.
2) Doppler broadening in Compton scattering
13
Doppler broadening in Compton scattering
Au 50 keV
G4PenelopeCompton includes it (analytical approach)
G4LowEnergyCompton recently updated (by MGPia) to deal with
Doppler broadening (EGS database approach)
Good agreement Penelope-LowEStandard Compton includes cross section suppression, but samples
final state according to Klein-NishinaLooking for suitable validation data
Compton scattering: electrons bound and not at rest (as assumed for Klein-Nishina)
change of angular distribution, reduction of XS
interesting < 0.5 MeV
On behalf of L.
Pandola
3) New PIXE models
15
New PIXE ionisation cross section models
PIXE is the standard method for quantitative elemental analysis in Ion Beam Analysis
New developments for the computation of ionisation cross sections in PIXE generation Theoretical model for K-shell ionisation by protons Theoretical model for K-shell ionisation by alpha
particles Semi-empirical model for Li-sub-shells ionisation
On behalf of H.
Abdelaouhed
16
Theoretical ECPSSR Model
for K-shell ionisation
Semi-Empirical Orlic Model
for Li-subshell ionisation
Relaxation process
X-Ray Fluorescence and/or Auger effect
Final state EADL library
PIXE generation process Incident protons
Incident alpha
Total ionisationcross section
PIXE overview
Data-Driven Modelfrom
Paul&Sacher data library for K-shell ionisation by protons
New !
New !
4) « Geant4 DNA » project
18
The Geant4-DNA project Purpose : extend Geant4 modelling capabilities
for the simulation of ionising radiation effects at the molecular level
Initiated in 2001 by P. Nieminen, Europen Space Agency/ESTEC
Applications : Radiobiology, radiotherapy and hadrontherapy (ex.
prediction of DNA strand breaks from ionising radiation) Radioprotection for human exploration of Solar system Not limited to biological materials (ex. Silicon)
19
Physics models in Geant4 DNA
e p H , He+, HeElastic
scattering
> 7.4 eVScreened
Rutherford> 7 eV
Champion
- - -
Excitation
A1B1, B1A1, Ryd A+B, Ryd C+D, diffuse
bands
7.4 eV – 10 MeV
Emfietzoglou
10 eV – 500 keVMiller Green
500 keV – 10 MeVBorn
-Effective
charge scaling from same
models as for proton
Charge Change - 1 keV – 10 MeV
Dingfelder1 keV – 10 MeV
DingfelderIonisatio
n
1b1, 3a1, 1b2, 2a1 + 1a1
12.6 eV – 30 keVBorn
100 eV – 500 keVRudd
500 keV – 10 MeVBorn
100 eV – 100 MeVRudd
• Models available for liquid water only• Models in black are analytical• Models in purple use interpolated data
20
Each physics process is characterized by one or several complementary or alternative models
Each model provides : a computation of the total cross section a computation of the final state : kinematics,
production of secondaries
A specific advanced example is available (microdosimetry) for users
Total cross sections
Software design migration for convergence Low-energy / Standard EM
22
Objectives Our objective is to build a coherent aproach of EM
interactions in Geant4, in full collaboration between the Standard Electromagnetic and Low Energy Electromagnetic working groups (see EM Physics talk by Vladimir)
In particular, we foresee : common physics lists, where the best models for low
and high energies are used a common software design common validation plans a coherent support of Geant4 hypernews cross references between Standard EM and Low Energy
EM web pages
23
Status all Penelope processes have been
migrated and tested
Livermore photon processes have been migrated and are being tested
all Geant4-DNA processes have been migrated and are being tested
24
Example : Photoelectric effect
Standard and migrated LowE are similar
25
Eexample: Penelope Compton
Gold – 50 keV Water (compound) – 6 MeV
• absolute cross sections are consistent and energy spectra are unchanged
• preliminary CPU performances are improved- initialization time (at the beginning of run) is reduced by 30% (handling of Physics tables)- running time is reduced of ~10% for water and of ~5% for gold (G4EmElementSelector)
Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)
Software performance improvement
27
Speeding-up of evaluated data based processes Poor performance of Low Energy Photoelectric, Compton and Rayleigh models
measured using GATE, as reported during the 2007 Hebden Bridge meeting
Step-by-step revision of G4EmDataSet and G4LogLogInterpolation classes, including checks in order to make sure that the revisions will induce negligible differences
An initial revision of the G4LogLogInterpolation class has been validated and included in the G4 version 9.2 . A gain of 6-10% (1.06 – 1.1 times) has been observed.
A gain of 45% is expected (1.45 times faster) if the logarithmic operations of the G4LogLogInterpolation class are replaced by a load operation of pre-calculated logarithm values (validated for GATE simulations were photoelectric, compton and rayleigh processes are mainly used).
Work under progress to expand this implementation for all low energy EM processes of Geant4.
The performance, and therefore the gain, depends on the type of processes used and the frequency in which interpolation calculations are required by a simulation application.
N. Karakatsanis, G. Loudos, J. Apostolakis in collaboration with Standard EM
On behalf of N.
Karakatsanis
III – Workplan
2009
2010-2012
29
Plans for 2009 1) Software design (June 2009) (+Std EM) - (Recommendation #3, R4, R5)
achieve testing of migrated Livermore photon processes (1 collaborator – FTE=0.25) migration of Livermore electron processes (ionisation, bremmstrahlung) (1 collaborator – FTE=0.25)
2) Software performance (June 2009) improvement of G4LogLogInterpolation class (1 collaborator – FTE=0.25)
3) Systematic testing (June 2009) (+Std EM) - (R1) (~10 collaborators – FTE ~ 2.0) extend coverage (particles, energies, materials) of automated tests
4) Build a reference data base for verification & validation (December 2009) (+Std EM) - (R1,R2,R3, R4, R18, R19, R21, R22, R24) (same number of collaborators as above)
theoretical predictions experimental data other Monte Carlo codes
5) Debugging of processes (December 2009) – MANPOWER NEEDED (1 collaborator – FTE=0.10) G4LowEnergyIonisation G4hLowEnergyIonisation
6) New Physics models with common design (December 2009) (+Std EM) improvement of Penelope models (1 collaborator – FTE=0.25) polarized photoelectric and gamma conversion, triple conversion models (space applications) (2 collaborators –
FTE=0.20)
7) Documentation (+Std EM) (December 2009) - (R1, R22, R24) (4 collaborators – FTE=0.40) common EM web pages
30
Physics (+Std EM) – MANPOWER NEEDED (1 collaborator – FTE=0.25) Migration of fluorescence/Auger emission
Software design (2010-2011) (+Std EM) – MANPOWER NEEDED (1 collaborator – FTE=0.25)
Redesign full data handling
Geant4-DNA (2009-2011) (+Std EM) (~4 collaborators – FTE~2.0) new Physics models in liquid water / other biological materials physico-chemistry processes implementation molecular geometries (DNA) biological damage quantification other applications : material sciences, injectors
Plans for 2010-2012
31
Manpower needs for low-energy EM Manpower will be needer for :
Debugging of Physics bugs accumulated over the years in the LowE Physics processes (most urgent)
Implementation/migration of fluorescence and Auger emission following standard EM design
Redesign of data table handling
Backup slides
33
Re-organisation Coordinator : S. Incerti (IN2P3/CENBG)
SB representatives : G. Cuttone (INFN/LNS), G. Montarou (IN2P3/LPCC),
18 Members today (they are members of the Geant4 collaboration) Haifa Ben Albelwahed (CNSTN, Tunisia) Stephane Chauvie (INFN, Torino U., Italy) Pablo Cirrone (INFN/LNS, Italy) Giacomo Cuttone (INFN/LNS, Italy) Gerardo De Paola (FAMAF, Argentina) Francesco Di Rosa (INFN/LNS, Italy) Ziad Francis (CNRS/IN2P3/IPHC, France) Susanna Guatelli (ANSTO, Australia) Sebastien Incerti (CNRS/IN2P3/CENBG, France) Anton Lechner (CERN, Switzerland) Francesco Longo (INFN/Trieste, Italy) Alfonso Mantero (INFN/Genova, Italy) Barbara Mascialino (Karolinska Institute, Sweden) Gerard Montarou (CNRS/IN2P3/LPC Clermont, France) Jakub Moscicki (CERN, Switzerland) Luciano Pandola (INFN/LNGS, GNO, Italy) Giorgio Russo (INFN/LNS, Italy) Giovanni Santin (ESA/ESTEC, The Netherlands)
34
External « experts »
collaborators with their own expertise they are not yet members of the Geant4 collaboration they will have the possibility to join the Geant4 collaboration after
one year of contribution to the low energy EM working group