Page1of15

LTE Integration of P25 ISSI for Colorado

June 2015

Prepared by:

Signals Analytics, LLC

Disclaimer:ThiswhitepaperwascreatedaspartofthedeliverablesduetotheFirstNetColoradocontractwithSignalsAnalytics,LLC.ThiswhitepaperwaspreparedfortheStateofColorado-Governor’sOfficeofInformationTechnologyusingfundsunderaward08-10-S13008fromtheNationalTelecommunicationsandInformationAdministration(NTIA),U.S.DepartmentofCommerce(DOC). Thestatements,findings,conclusions,andrecommendationsarethoseoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheNTIA,DOCorFirstNet.

Page2of15

Contents

ExecutiveOverview......................................................................................................................................2

OverviewofP25ISSIInterface.....................................................................................................................3

OverviewofStateandFrontRangeRadioNetworks...................................................................................4

OptionsforLTEInteroperability..................................................................................................................6

OTTApplications......................................................................................................................................7

MCPTT....................................................................................................................................................10

PSBNandCommercialIntegration.............................................................................................................13

SuggestedStateActions.........................................................................................................................15

Executive Overview TheStateofColoradoGovernor’sOfficeofInformationTechnology(OIT)hasbeenplanningfortheimplementationofastatewideLongTermEvolution(LTE)networkthatwillbepartoftheNationalPublicSafetyBroadbandNetwork(NPSBN).Theintentisthat,overtime,thisLTEnetworkwillprovidesignificantterrestrialanddeployablebroadbandcoverageforalllocal,tribal,stateandfederalfirstrespondersinColorado.ItisunknownwhenthisvisionwillbefullyrealizedandthereforethesupportofexistingLandMobileRadio(LMR)systemswillberequiredfortheforeseeablefuture.Additionally,manyindividualjurisdictionswithinthestateofColoradohaveprocuredorareupgradingandexpandingtheirLMRcapabilities.ThesesignificantinvestmentsinLMRwillbeutilizedformanyyearsandprovidethebasisofcurrentwirelessmissioncriticalvoicecommunicationsfortheState.ThesedrivingfactorsarethemainforcewithdevelopingaplannedapproachofhowtointegrateLMRandLTEnetworksacrossthestateinawaythatiscompatiblewiththeNPSBN,technicallyfeasibleandcosteffective.

TheColoradostatewideDigitalTrunkedRadioSystemorDTRSisanAssociationofPublic-SafetyOfficialsProject25(P25)networkthatinterconnectstootherP25networksviatheInterSub-SystemInterface(ISSI).SeveraloptionsexistandwillsoonbedevelopedforconnectingnativelyfromaLTEnetworktotheISSI.LTENetworksareinherentlyIPbasedandtheintroductionofmissioncriticalpush-to-talk(MCPTT)inLTERelease13promisesdirectconnectivitybetweenP25andLTE.DeployingthisMCPTToverLTEinteroperabilitywillincreasethefunctionalityoftheP25networktoLTEdevicesandpotentiallyreducecongestionontheP25channels.ThiswhitepaperwillwalkthroughthedefinitionoftheISSIinterface,ISSIinteroperabilityinthestateofColorado,differentimplementationsofISSIintoLTEandsuggestedactionstohelpensureISSIandLTEintegration.ColoradohastheopportunitytosetacourseofdirectiontoensurebothtypesnetworkscanworkcooperativelyforthenextgenerationofPublicSafetycommunications.

UnknownField Code Changed

UnknownField Code Changed

Kim Coleman� 6/6/2016 2:27 PMDeleted:5

UnknownField Code ChangedUnknownField Code ChangedUnknownField Code ChangedUnknownField Code ChangedUnknownField Code Changed

Page3of15

Overview of P25 ISSI Interface ThecurrentstandardforpublicsafetyLMRwascreatedbytheAPCOProject25ProgramandisknownsimplyasP25.P25hasitsownstandardsprocessthatismanagedindependentlybytheTelecommunicationsIndustryAssociation(TIA)andtheyhavedevelopedover75maindocuments1thatspecifytheentirenetworkend-to-end.TheTIATSB-102-Bdocumentationsuitecoversthemethodologyofhowvendorsandusersutilizethenetwork.Themajorityofthedocumentsarecenteredontheradiofrequency(RF)orCommonAirInterface(CAI),asthiswasonetheprimaryreasonsforthefragmentationintheLMRmarket.However,itwasquicklynotedthatinteroperabilitybetweennetworkinterfaceswasnecessaryandcreationofanewinterfacewouldberequired.SpecificallytheTIA-102.BACA-A2documentdefineshowRadioFrequencySubsystems(RFSS)canbeconnectedviaanIPinterfacetoallowwirelineinteroperability.TheInterSub-SystemInterface(ISSI)isanIPbasedconnectionbasedontheSessionInitiationProtocol3(SIP)forcallcontrolandmediaishandledviatheReal-timeTransportProtocol4(RTP).UsingIPinsteadofTDMbasedtechnologyandopeninterfaceswasanewdirectionforPublicSafetyLMR.TheuseofinternationallystandardizedinterfacesallowedforinteroperabilitybetweendifferentvendorsRFSS,whichbeforetheISSIwasonlypossibleviabasebandvoicegateways.

Colorado’sstatewideLMRsystemknownastheDigitalTrunkedRadioSystemorDTRS5utilizesP25technologyforPush-To-Talk(PTT)voiceservices.TheDTRSP25networkcananddoesconnecttootherP25networksviaISSI.TheuseofISSIallowsdisparateP25systemslikeFrontRangeCommunicationsConsortium(FRCC)andCityofWestminstertobeconnectedviaastandardizedSIPbasedinterface.MuchlikeANSI-41inCodeDivisionMultipleAccess(CDMA)andGlobalSystemMobile(GSM)MobileApplicationPart(MAP)interfacesthatareusedforcellularroaming,theISSIcanalsoallownon-P25systemstobeinterconnectedtoforeignP25networkstoenableinteroperabilityandthatistheprimarypremiseofthiswhitepaper.

FS FS

ISSI

RFSSRFSS

SU SU

RFSS–RFSubsystemFS–FixedStationSU–SubscriberUnitISSI–InterSubsystemInterface

Figure1:ISSINetworkDiagram

1http://www.pscr.gov/about/highlights/citig_2011/citig_p25_standards_process_122011.pdf2https://global.ihs.com/doc_detail.cfm?document_name=TIA-102.BACA3https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3261.txt4https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3550.txt5Seehttp://www.oit.state.co.us/cto/dtrsformoreinformationonDTRS

Page4of15

TheISSIsupportstraditionalgrouporone-to-manyvoicecommunicationsanditalsosupportsdirectsubscriberunit(SU)voicecommunications.SomeofthebasicfeaturesthattheISSIprovidesarethefollowing:

• GroupCallSetup/Teardown• SUCallSetup/Teardown• PTTVoiceservicesforGroupandSUCalls• RoamingServices

o SubscriberManagemento SUAuthentication

FunctionallytheISSIprovidessomeofthebasiccallconnectivitythatmostpeopleareusedtoinmoderncellularnetworks.Ifnetwork‘A’andnetwork‘B’areconnectedviatheISSI,thenSUsinnetwork‘A’cancallSUsinnetwork‘B’.Regardlessiftheradiosareprogrammedfordifferentfrequencies,aslongastheSUIDorgroupIDisavailablethenPTTvoicecommunicationscanbeestablished.AsimilarusecasewouldbeaT-MobilecellphonecallingaSprintcellphone.Thisisanexampleofinteroperabilityacrossnetworks.

ISSIprovidessimilarcapabilityforP25roamingasseeninacellularroamingscenariowhereanAT&TcellphoneisphysicallyinaTelefonicanetworkandcanmake/receivecalls.Ifnetwork‘A’SUscansupportthesamechannels,frequencies,numberingplanandtalkgroupsofnetwork“B”,thenroamingcanbeaccomplished.Network‘B’SUswillbeabletoauthenticateandmakecallswhileinnetwork‘A’coverage.Capabilitieslikethisarecrucialformutualaidsituationsonborderingjurisdictionswherecoordinatedeffortsarerequiredbymultipleagencies.

However,itshouldbenotedthatwhentheP25ISSIwascreated,LTEwasnotevendeployedoravailableasastandardandthusitwasneverenvisionedasaninterfaceintoP25networks.TheISSIinterfacewasinitiallymeantandstilldefinedasaninterfacebetweentwoP25RFSSs–notanRFSSandLTEIMScoreorMCPTTserver.DuetotheflexibilityofLTEapplicationserversandIMScorenetworkinfrastructure,theinfrastructurecanemulatethesignalingandmediaofaP25RFSSessentially“looking”likeaP25RFSS.

Overview of State and Front Range Radio Networks Startingin2001theStateanditagainin2008OITbeganupgradingtheirLMRnetworktoP25andestablishingtheDTRSacrosstheState.The220radiositesandfiveZoneControllersprovideserviceforover1,000state,local,county,federalandtribalagencieswith82,000+subscriberradios.6InadditiontotheDTRSP25network,severalotherP25networksresidewithindividualagenciesoperatingthroughouttheState.Operationalneeds,fundingandtechnicalchallengeshavepreventedinterconnectionofallthesenetworks.ForintegrationintoaLTEMCPTTsystemtherewillbeadesiretoconnectthroughacommonorcentralrouterbywhichalltheseLMRnetworksareconnectedto.MinimizingconnectionpointsandIPhopswillhelpensurethattheSIPandRTPpacketsbetween6http://www.oit.state.co.us/cto/dtrsN

Page5of15

networkscanbedeliveredwithminimumlatencyandappropriatesecurity.WithintheNorthCentralRegion(NCR),whichincludesDenverandits9surroundingcounties,thevariousP25networksthathavebeenworkingtointerconnecttheirISSIandcreatecommonchannelnamingconventionsforcrossnetworkuseandroaming.ThePublicSafetyCommunicationsSubcommittee(PSCS)thatmanagesthisprocesshasalsobeenworkingtodefineEMStalkgroupsandEOCtalkgroups.TheproposedcommonhubapproachtheyaredeployingenvisionsthefollowingentitiestobepartofthenetworktheirISSIsharingagreement:

• FrontRangeCommunicationsConsortium(FRCC)–IntergovernmentalAgreementbetweenAdcom911andWeldCounty

• DenverInternationalAirport(DIA)• FederalBureauofInvestigation(FBI)• CityofWestminster,CO• CityofAurora,CO• MetropolitanAreaRadioCooperative(MARC)–CooperativebetweencitiesofDenver,

Lakewood&Arvada• ColoradoStatePatrol(CSP)-future

EachoneoftheseP25networkshasISSIcapabilitythatisprovidedbyvendorssuchasMotorolaSolutions,Cassidian(AirbusDefense)andHarrisCorporation.ThesevendorsandjurisdictionshavebeenworkingcollaborativelyonISSIinteroperability.EventhoughtheISSIisstandardized,theimplementationoftheISSIisleftuptoeachvendor,whichrequiressignificantintegrationefforttoensureinteroperability.HarrishastakenacentralroleinimplementinginteroperabilityfortheregionwithISSIconnectionstoMotorolaSolutionsandEADSsystemslocatedintheMARC,DTRSandbetweentheWestminsternetworkandFRCC.Additionally,theDTRSsystemhasanISSIconnectiontoFRCCandDTRS.WiththeISSI,usersontheDTRScannowcommunicatetotheWestminsterusersgoingthroughtheFRCCconnection.Although,thisisnotanidealorleastcostroute,itprovidesameansforestablishingcallsacrossmultiplenetworks.

Page6of15

FBI

DIA

Aurora

DTRS

MARC

FRCC Westminster

ExistingConnection

FutureConnection

HarrisISSI

Figure2:FrontRangeISSIInterconnection Source:RenderedfromHarrisCorp.Info

OneoftheissuesthePSCSisdealingwithistheaspectofinteroperabilityversusencryption.Duetothemultiplicityofvendors,eachnetworkhasestablisheddifferentmodesofencryption;somevendorsuseAES256andotheruse3DES.EncryptionoptionsforP25networksrequiresignificantlicensingcostsandthedifferentencryptiontechniquesarenotcompatiblewitheachother.Intheoryencryptionkeyscouldeasilybesharedacrossnetworks,asthereisnocommonP25keymanagementfunctionbetweenallthenetworks.

Withinthestate,theNCRisoneoftheonlyconsortiaworkingoninterconnectingISSIandcreatingthisabilityforborderingregionstointerconnect.ThenecessityforconnectiontootherP25andnon-P25systemsinotherpartsofthestatearenotdeemedasoperationallynecessaryatthispoint.Manyjurisdictionsthataregeographicallyseparateddonotoperationallyinteractwitheachother.Theamountofresourcesnecessarytoplan,design,implement,manageandmaintainISSIinterconnectstonon-collaboratingjurisdictionsissomethingthatwouldbenearlyimpossibletofund.However,interoperabilitybetweensurroundingstatessuchasUtahandWyomingintotheColoradoDTRSandbordercounties/citiesiscrucialformutualaidoperations.

Options for LTE Interoperability TheintegrationofP25PTTvoiceservicesintoLTEnetworkscanbeaccomplishedintwogeneralways.ThefirstoptionistouseanOver-The-Top(OTT)serviceandthesecondoptionistoimplement3GPPMissionCriticalPTT(MCPTT).WewillevaluatethebenefitsandchallengesofeachimplementationforColorado.

Page7of15

OTT Applications UtilizingOTTapplicationsissomethingthatcanbeaccomplishedtodaywithavastarrayofoptions.OnGooglePlaythereareover150applicationsavailablefordownloadthatpurporttoofferPTTfunctionality,twoyearsagotherewereonly16apps.Theseappsthoughcanbesplitintotwomajorcategories,thefirstofthosethatareenterprisegradeandsecondtierofappsthatareforrecreationaluse.Forthefocusofthispaperwewillconsiderapplicationsthatareconsideredenterprisegrade.AsampleofsomeoftheapplicationsthatfitintothiscategorywouldbeBeOn,Zello,VoxerWalkieTalkie,BroadNet,ClearSAPTT,MotoTalkandWaveMobileCommunications7.

Theseapplicationseitherworkwithanenterprisegradeserverdeployedinthepublicsafetynetworkoracloudbasedserver.UsingaserverlocatedwithinyourownLTEnetworkofferscontroloverfeatures,additionalsecurityandeasierintegrationintoaP25network.Cloudbasedsolutionscanbeimplementedimmediately,areverycosteffectiveandscalefromsingleusertomassiveenterprisegradewithrelativeease.NearlyallOTTPTTapplicationshavetheabilitytoworkonmultiplebroadbandaccesstechnologiessuchasWi-Fi,LTEandeven3Gdata.SeveraloftheappsalsohaveadesktopapplicationsoPCuserscanutilizePTTandchatwithmobiledeviceusers.ThisaddedfunctionalityacrossmultipleaccesstechnologiesandnetworkscanbeveryattractivebyallowingmultipleauthorizedusersaccesstotheP25networkviatheISSIconnection.Additionally,someofthefeaturerichfunctionalityofferedinOTTappsisnotnecessarilyavailableinMCPTT.Theseoptionsinclude

• Chatortextintegration• Filetransfer• Nearlyunlimitedvirtualtalkgroupcreation• Geo-fencedtalkgroupcreation• Geo-locationtracking• PushtoVideointegration• Presenceindicators(seewho’sinserviceoronline)• PTTtoPC,smartphone,tablet,IPPhoneandLMR• Advancedsecurityattheapplicationlayer

SomesmartphonevendorssuchasSamsungandKyocerahaveworkedtointegratetheirphysicalPTTbuttontotheapplicationsoftbuttonfortrueseamlessinteroperability.ThecosttoimplementandscaleupusersonOTTsystemsmakestheiruseveryattractiveforgovernmentusers.OTTsystemsareinusebymanygovernmentagenciessuchastheUSArmy8andNCR9users.ThetwomajorvendorsofLMRequipmentintoColoradoareHarrisandMotorola.

• SpecifictoHarrisistheBeOnsystem,whichisaPTTapplicationserverplatformandphoneapplicationsoftware.TheBeOnsystemsupportsgeographicredundancyandhasGIScapabilitiestoshowusersonanear-realtimemapandvisuallyselectthemtotalk.ItfullyintegrateswiththeHarrisISSIsolutionandsupportsothervendorISSInetworkswithadvancedfeatureslikeembeddedAMBEvocodersandAESencryption.

7Norecommendationsaretobeinferredwithanyoftheseapplications.Itismerelyarepresentationofsomeoftheavailablechoices.8http://blog.zello.com/?p=6259HarrisBeOnisbeingevaluatedbymultipleagenciesintheNCR

Page8of15

• MotorolaSolutionsutilizessimilarapplicationserverplatformandphoneapplicationsoftwarecalledWaveMobileCommunications(NOTE:thisistheformerTwistedPairsolution).TheWaveserverandapplicationhavefullinteroperabilityandintegrationwithMotorolaAstro25networks.Advancedfeaturesforfloorcontrolandend-to-endencryptionaresupportedwithinanAstro25networkonly.BasicfeaturesforvoiceinteroperabilitycanbesupportedthroughaseparateISSIgateway.

SincethesesystemssupportP25capabilitiesinAndroidandApplebasedphones,theyusetheP25IMBE/AMBEcodec.Thisallowsoftheconceptofend-to-endfunctionalitywithencryption.However,thisfunctionalitydoesnotscalewelleconomicallyastheAMBE/IMBEcodecisalicensedpieceofsoftware.Inmostcasesthismakestheappcostover$300perdevice–whichcouldbemorethanthecostofalow-tiersmartphone.ThecoststructureisessentiallylinearwithverylittlediscountforthevolumesthatColoradowouldneedandthismakesenablingitsuseforallsmartphoneuserspotentiallycostprohibitive.Additionally,theAMBE/IMBEcodecisnotnativetoLTEdevicesandwillrunontheapplicationprocessorofthedevice.ThisimplementationisnotanoptimizedconfigurationandtypicallyleadstohigherbatterydrainandlesstalktimeonthedevicewhencomparedtoanativevocoderrunningonaDSPchip.AppcompatibilitytestingwouldbenecessarytoensureallLTEdevicesperformnominallywiththeapplication.

Anothersolutiontohelpreduceindividualdevicelicensingcostsistoutilizeamorecentralizedapproachinthenetworkcalledtranscoding.Transcodinghasbeenusedfordecadesincellularnetworksandvideoformattingwithgreatsuccess.Theprocessinvolvesperformingadigital-to-digitalformatconversiontosomethingthetargetnetworkordevicecaninterpret.SystemssuchastheCiscoInstantConnectUMSserversupporton-demandtranscodingofP25AMBE/IMBEvocoderstocommonformatssuchasG.711.OpensourceorlicensefreecodecssuchasAMR10andG.711areverypopularandofferexcellentvoicequality.Bytranscodingcentrally,licensecostscanbemanagedacrossthenetworkmoreeffectivelythanperdevice.Transcodingcanincursomelossanddelaybutpacketsmustbedecryptedbeforebeingtranscoded.Ifend-to-endencryptionisnecessarythetranscodedpacketsneedtobere-encryptedbeforebeingdeliveredtotheenddevice.Itisessentialthatthefunctionneedstoresideinasecurenetworktoensureend-to-endsecurity.

TheotheraspecttoconsiderwithOTTPTTisthatonceavendorisselectedfortheapplication,youarelockedintothatecosystem.ForinstanceaZelloPTTsystemcannotdirectlycommunicatetoaVoxerPTTsystem.Asstatedaboveyoucantranscodeoruseavoicegatewaybutyouloseallthekeyfunctionalityandhaveonlyavoicepath.Foreigndeviceauthenticationandinteroperabilitytypicallybreaksunderthismodelorbecomesalargescalemanagementproblem.FormutualaidusersacrossstatebordersorfromtheNPSBNmaybeusinganotherapporMCPTTthatisdifferentfromthestateandthiswouldcreateinteroperabilityissues.TheotherveryimportantaspectisthatOTTapplicationsarenotdirectlyintegratedintotheLTEUE,RadioAccessNetwork(RAN)orEvolvedPacketCore(EPC).Theuseoffeaturestoenablequalityofserviceandpriority(e.g.QCIsettings)wouldneedtobemanuallyimplementedinthenetwork–whichistheoreticallypossiblebutwouldrequireconsiderableefforttoimplementandmaintain.AdvancedfeaturesinVoLTEandMCPTTtoenhancecelledgeperformancemayalsonotbeavailableforOTTapplicationspotentiallycausingperformanceissues.

10AMRisusedintheGSMfamilyofcellphonedeviceswhichnumberinthemultipleofbillionsglobally

Page9of15

ItshouldbenotedthatOTTappshavebeenveryadepttoimplementingadvancedfeatureslikeimmediateperilandmandownbuttonfunctionality.TheirabilitytointegrateISSI,implementchangesandadaptdynamicallytothemarketdemandsmakestheiruseveryattractive.

Page10of15

MCPTT MCPTT11iscurrentlybeingdevelopedin3GPPSA6forRelease13.ThestudyonApplicationArchitecture&ArchitectureEnhancementstotheEPSandIMSwascompletedinSept2015.Completingthefunctionalarchitectureandinformationflowsforthe3GPPRelease13March2016freezedatewillallowvendorstostartdevelopingMCPTTsystems.CurrentlyvendorsfromEricsson12andSamsung13arealreadydemoingpre-Release13MCPTTthatcanbeupgradedbysoftwaretobecomplianttoR13.AttheendofMarch2016Release13contentwasfrozenwithamajorityofthefeaturesnecessaryforMCPTT.ManyofthefeaturesinP25willberepresentedinMCPTTforLTEincluding:

Security Codecs&MediaHandlingCallControl–On/OffNetwork FloorControl–On/OffNetworkBroadcastControl–On/OffNetwork GroupManagementIdentityManagement ConfigurationManagement

ThereareseveralkeyfeaturesthatMCPTTcanofferwhichwillbedifficultforOTTproviderstocompetewith.ThefirstandforemostisthatMCPTTisalsopartofRelease14anddevicesthatareRelease14compliantwillhaveundergonesignificantperformanceandfunctionaltesting.AnexampleofthisistheinclusionofOffNetworkfeaturestosupportLTE-Direct(LTE-D)orProximityServices(ProSe).TheintentofLTE-Distoprovidedirectdevice-to-devicecommunicationsoffnetworkforoperationalsupportofpublicsafetyusersthatareoutofLTEnetworkcoverage.ThefunctionalityissimilartooperatinginP25simplexordirectmode.Operationallythough,theperformanceofLTE-DdevicesmayvaryfromP25subscriberssinceLTEsmartphonepowerwilllikelybelimitedto23dBm.

Secondly,inRelease13wasthecreationofnewQualityofServiceClassIdentifiers(QCI)tosupportMCPTTforusercontrolandplanetraffic.NotablyQCI65,whichisaGuaranteedBitRateBearerandQCI69whichisintendedforMCPTTsignalinghavebeenspecifiedtoprovideguaranteedpacketdeliveryintheshortestpossibletimeforLTE.Developingalloftheauthenticationprocedures,callmanagementfeaturesandQCIissomethingthatOTTvendorswillnotbeabletotakeadvantageofeasily.UtilizingQoSiscrucialforMCPTTtoensureguaranteedvoicedeliveryinloadedconditions.TheNPSBNmayresultinsharedspectrumwithcommercialservice.DuringpeaktimesofPublicSafetyandcommercialnetworkuse,theabilitytodifferentiatePublicSafetyMCPTTtrafficfromcommercialtrafficwillbeanoperationalnecessity.

Lastly,theuseofenhancedmulticastbroadcast(eMBMS)allowsforefficientgroupcommunications.HistoricallyandoperationallymostPublicSafetyPTTvoiceusehasbeenaone-to-manyimplementationwiththeuseoftalkgroups.However,LTEoperatesnativelyinauni-castmethodofcommunication,e.g.,user-to-userforvoicecommunications.Theconceptofone-to-manycommunicationswasoriginallyenvisionedforbroadcastTVservicesonLTEandthusthestandardforeMBMSwascreated.TheadoptionofeMBMShasbeenhamperedintheUS,bymostcarriers,duetotheusecasesnotjustifyingthecostoffullyimplementingit,(i.e.viewinghabitshavechangedtoondemandvideofromNetflix,YouTube…etc.).CurrenteMBMSimplementationsrequireaminimumof10%oftheresourceblocks(RB)toutilizeit;futurereleasesmayallowfordynamicusethough.ForBand14thatwould11http://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/23179.htm12http://www.ericsson.com/news/189840813http://www.whowired.com/407675.htm

Page11of15

mean5resourceblocksor900kHzofspectrumwouldbeneedtobededicatedforsupportingeMBMSMCPTT.Thiswouldallowforinstantaneousmulti-castcommunicationsovertheentireeMBMScoverageareaforMCPTTandcouldbeutilizedforcommonmutualaidchannelsoralerts.OTTapplicationscouldpotentiallytakeadvantageofeMBMSbutitwillrequireanadditionalintegrationeffortwhencomparedtoMCPTT.ItshouldbenotedthatrecentlyAustraliancarrierTelstra14,hasimplementedeMBMSononeofitsthree20MHzLTEbandsandpotentiallywillbeevaluatingMCPTTforuseonthenetworktosupportAustralianGovernmentForces.

Identitymanagement

client

MCPTT-1

CSC-1

CSC-2

CSC-3

Commonservicescore

Floorcontrolserver

Floorparticipant

MCPTT-4

Groupmanagement

client

Identitymanagement

server

Groupmanagement

server

CSC-4 Configurationmanagement

client

Configurationmanagement

server

Interworkingfunctionto

legacysystem

IWF-1

MCPTT-3OtherMCPTTserver

MCPTTserver

MCPTTclientMCPTT-5

Mediadistributionfunction

MCPTTUE

Mediamixer

MCPTT-7

MCPTT-8

MCPTT-6

EPS

MCPTTuserdatabase

MCPTT-2MB2C

Rx

CSC-5

Othergroupmanagement

serverCSC-7

MCPTT-9

CSC-6

Keymanagement

client

CSC-8Keymanagement

server

CSC-10

CSC-9

CSC-13

Figure3:MCPTTOn-NetworkFunctionalDiagram Source:3GPPTS23.179

TheinitialintentforMCPTTwastofullyusetheIMScorefunctionalitybut3GPPhasallowedsomeflexibilityhereinanticipationofPublicSafety.3GPPhasallowedfornon-IMSMCPTTapplicationserverstobepartofthestandardaslongastheirexternalinterfacesareinteroperablewithIMSnetworks,EPSnetworksandtheMCPTTsubsystems.ForOTTvendorsthismeansthatanOTTserverthathasmanyoftheaforementionedrichfeaturesnotinherenttoMCPTT(e.g.chatcapabilities)couldprovideMCPPTservicestoanLTEnetwork.

TheMCPTTfunctionnetworkincludestheIWF-1interface(seeFigure3)whichistheinterworkingfunctioninterfacetolegacynetworks.TheinclusionoftheIWF-1meansthatP25networkswillbeabletonativelyintegratewithLTEMCPTT.TheP25ISSIinterfacewouldoperateasthefunctionalconnection14http://www.ericsson.com/news/1898408

Page12of15

andterminateSIP/RTPtrafficattheIWF.ThecurrentMCPTTstandarddoesnotmandatetheuseofAMBE/IMBEvocodersbutallowsfortranscodingtotheapprovedAMR-WBcodec.P25SUexclusivelyusetheAMBE/IMBEcodecandthesearequiteexpensivetolicenseinLTEdevices.SincetranscodingwilllikelybeutilizedforMCPTTcallstonon-LTEdevices,thesecurityimpacts,latencyimpactsandscalingforusersintheStatewillneedtobeevaluated.TheIWF-1interfaceconnectstoamediafunction,whichwilldeterminewhethertopassthetrafficthroughortranscodethevoicepackets.MCPTTisalsointendedtoscaletosupportinexcessof500,000MCPTTgroupsandupto150simultaneousgroupcallsinaLTEsector.15ThistypeofscalabilitywillprovideenoughgrowthwithintheMCPTTsystemforalluserswithintheState.

153GPPTS23.179–AppendixC

Page13of15

PSBN and Commercial Integration AunifiedsolutionthatencompassesinteroperabilitybetweenP25,LTEandIPnetworksshouldbesomethingthattheNPSBNaccomplishes.WiththeintegrationofP25ISSIvoicecommunicationstherearemultipleconsiderationsthatshouldbeaccountedfortoensureinteroperabilityandusabilitywhenconnectingtoaLTEnetwork.

1. ThePublicSafetyLTEnetworkthatwillbedeployedinColoradowillbeastatewidenetworkregardlessofwhetheritisbuiltbyFirstNetorColorado.

2. ManyagencieshaveexistingcommercialLTEdevicesandservicecontractswhichtheywillcontinuetoutilize.

3. TheDTRSandotherP25networksthroughoutthestatewillalsocontinuetooperateintotheforeseeablefuturetosupportPublicSafetyoperations.

4. ManyPSAPshaveupgradedtoIPbasedphonesystems(e.g.CiscoandAvaya)ashavemanygovernmentoffices.

ThetechnologyandtestingexiststodaytoprovideP25ISSIconnectivitytocommercialLTEandPublicSafetyLTEnetworks.Theabilitytointegratethemultiplevendors’ISSIsolutionsintoLTEandotheraccesstechnologiesisbeingdoneintheNCRwiththeHarrisBeOnnetworkandsmartphonesoperatingonvariouscommercialcarriers.JurisdictionsevaluatingPTTsolutionsshouldavoidproprietarysolutionsthatdonotinteroperatewithP25andMCPTT.InvestinginaPTTsolutionfromavendorwillrequirethoroughlyevaluatingasolutionthatcanscalecosteffectively,integrateintoexistingpublicsafetynetworksandbeeasilyupgradedtoMCPTT.

ColoradoisalsofortunatetohavetheAdcom911LTEnetworkasoneofonly5PSBNearlybuilderprojectsintheentirecountry.ThenetworkiscurrentlyLTEonlyanditdoesnothaveMCPTTorVoLTEdeployed,sotherearenonativevoiceservicesavailable;onlyVoIPserviceslikeSkypeorOTTPTTapplicationscanbeused.ItisunknownifthecurrentGeneralDynamicsEPCcansupportMCPTTandtheydonothaveanIMScoredeployedlocally.Additionally,thePCRFhasnotbeenenabledtodeployQCIdifferentiationfordifferentbearers.IfthesetechnicalissuescanbeaddressedbythevendorthentheAdcom911networkcouldbeusedasatestbedforOTTandMCPTTsystems.MostofthisintegrationcouldtakeplacewithoutIMS,evenforpre-Release13MCPTTandsimplechangestothePCRF.TheapplicationserverscouldresideinvendorlocationspendingIPconnectivity.WithaccesstoFRCCandDTRSISSI,thesystemcouldbeusedtotestmultipleinteroperabilityscenariosandproveoutsystemconfigurations.

OTTPTTintegrationintoacommercialcarrierisassimpleasdownloadingtheapplicationonmultiplephonesandhavingtrafficgoovertheinternet.However,forintegrationoftheISSI,theISSIgatewayneedstobeaddressablefromtheinternetorhavearoutableIPaddress.AnyOTTapplicationthatisbeingconsideredshouldhavedirectsupportforISSI.IfaparticularappdoesnotsupportISSIinteroperability;itshouldbedisqualifiedfromconsideration.Additionally,anyOTTPTTappshouldbesoftwareupgradeabletoMCPTT.Strongconsiderationshouldbegiventoevaluatingpre-Release13MCPTTsystemsfromthevariousLTEinfrastructurevendorsthatarecurrentlyofferingthisfeature.IntheeventofintegrationintoanLTEnetwork,theP25systemitisinterconnectingtoshouldactasthe“homeRFSS”;theLTEnetworkshouldlooklikethe“servingRFSS”.

Page14of15

Lastly,developingaStatewideISSIhuborclearinghousewouldbeidealtoensureinteroperabilitybetweenallP25networks.WiththeappropriateamountofIPredundancy,thiswouldcreateasingleentrypointforcommercialandPublicSafetyLTEnetworkstointerfacewith.ItmaytakeasignificantamountoftimetoimplementthisbutsystemssimilartoNCR’sproposalareproposingareagoodstarttobeginintegration.

FS FS

ISSI

DTRSFRCC

SU SUISSI

Gateway

ISSI

eNodeB PSLTEUe

Internet

MCPTTServer

AdcomLTEEPC

ISSIISSI

CommercialLTEEPC

eNodeBUe

OTTServer

Figure4:ProposedLogicalISSIGateway&MCPTTDiagram

Page15of15

Suggested State Actions UponexaminationofthefuturegrowthofLTEforpublicsafetythereareseveralareaswhereColoradocanprovideaframeworktoensuresuccessfulintegrationofISSIandLTE.

Table1:Issues&Solutions

Issue SuggestedSolutionLimitedcoordinationacrossmultipleagenciesP25networksacrosstheNCRhascreatedtheissueofdevelopingaconnectionhubandgovernancestructureforroaming.

ThePSCSefforthasspearheadedthiseffortfortheNCR.SupportingthisgroupwiththeappropriateresourcesandexpandingthescopetoincludetheentirestateandborderingStates(e.g.Wyoming,Kansas,Utah)wouldhelpleadtodevelopingacommonISSIinterconnectionscheme.

CurrentlythereislimitedefforttointerconnectalltheP25networkswithintheStateasthereisnooperationalneedtodothisforgeographicallyseparateareas.ForastatewideornationwideLTEnetworkalogicallycentralconnection(router)shouldbecreatedasanISSIclearinghousetoallowconnectionacrossallagencies.Definitionofauthorizedusersandsharingofencryptionkeyscouldbewithinscope.

ThefewerinterconnectionpointsthatthePSBNhastoISSItheeasieritwillbetomanageoverallanditwillincreasenetworkperformancebyhavinglessrouterhopstonegotiate.HostingandmanaginganISSIgateway(s)withthisscaletakessignificantresources.LTEisanallIPnetworkandallinterconnectionswillneedtobeIPbased,noTDMconnectionswouldbeallowed.LeveragingexistingsystemsintheNCR/FRCCwouldbelogicalsteptowardsdesigningacentralconnectionhub.

Commonlistsofservices,talk/callgroupnamingconventions,numberingplansandalloweduserequipmentwillbenecessaryforimplementingvirtualtalkgroupsinaMCPTTLTEnetwork.

ThecoordinationeffortacrossallISSIchannelsandnon-ISSIchannelsneedstotakeplacetointegrateintoMCPTT.Theaforementionedgroupcouldhelpmanagethiseffortlocallythroughoutthestateandcreateacommonservicelevelagreement.

SIPandRTP(theprotocolsusedinISSI)donottraverseacrossfirewallsandmultipleprivaterouterswithoutsignificantdesignengineering.NearlyalljurisdictionsareontheirownprivateandpublicIPaddressingschemes,whichwillmakeimplementingISSILTEintegrationverydifficulttoachieve.

RoutableIPaddressesshouldbeusedforallISSIsubscribersandLTEMCPTTsubscribers.Thismaynotbepracticalwithexistingimplementations.Thenewlyformedtaskgroupshouldinvestigatedualstack(IPv4/IPv6)usabilityinthenetwork.IPv6allocationsandcoordinationshouldbeconsideredforallISSInetworksacrosstheState.

SeveraltrialsaregoingoninvariousjurisdictionswithOTTPTTsystems.MCPTTwillnotbefullycommerciallyavailableuntil2017ininternationalmarketsandlikelyinthe2018-2019timeframeforFirstNet.HowcanColoradoensureISSIinteroperability,futurecapabilitiesandcosttargetscanbeachievedifmultipleOTTsystemsaredeployed?

AnyOTTPTTsystemthatisbeingconsideredforprocurementshouldbesoftwareupgradeabletoMCPTT,supportISSInativelyandoffermultiplecodecs.AfullyresourcedandfunctionaltestbedcouldbecreatedinconjunctionwiththeAdcomLTEnetwork,NCRISSInetworkandcommercialcarriers.ThegoalwouldbetoevaluateavailableOTTandMCPTTsolutionsandintegratethemintothenetwork,andhelpcreatedesigncriteriaforastatewideimplementation.

CostconsiderationsrelatedtoISSIsustainability,e.g.,ISSIlicensesperportanddevicearecostlytomaintainpersystem.AnISSIhubmaybecostprohibitivetomaintain.

ThecurrentFirstNetRFPrequiresPublicSafetyEnterpriseNetworks(PSEN)tobecomplianttoFirstNetinterfaces.ItisunknownwhatthecoststosupportandmaintaintheseinterfacesareandwhowouldbeartheongoingcostofISSIinteroperability.FurtherinvestigationisrequiredonthisonceanOfferorhasbeenselected.ThetechnicalteamcanalsoinvestigateusingMC-PTTastheinteroperabilitysolutionbetweenjurisdictionsasopposedtoanISSIhub,orlookatnon-ISSIsolutionsforMC-PTTintegration.