Date post: | 12-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | blaise-houston |
View: | 225 times |
Download: | 1 times |
LuAnn Tandy 2009 1
UNPACKING THE PIECES FOR EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICEUNPACKING THE PIECES FOR EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICELuAnn Tandy, RN, PhD StudentLuAnn Tandy, RN, PhD Student
LuAnn Tandy 2009 2
Today’s Goal
EBP EBP
LuAnn Tandy 2009 3
We went to school to be…..
LuAnn Tandy 2009 4
But its more like….
LuAnn Tandy 2009 5
7 Days Worth of Stuff
It used to be that patients stayed in the hospital about 7 days.
So….we taught nurses how to do 7 days worth of stuff.
Now patients stay 2-3 days We continue to hold nurses to providing the
same standard of care we gave patients when their stays were 7 days.
Dr. Tim Porter-O’Grady 2007
LuAnn Tandy 2009 6
Evidence-based Medicine
The Institute of Medicine defines evidence-based practice (EBP) as “the integration of best research, clinical expertise, and patient values in making decisions about the care of individualized patients”
LuAnn Tandy 2009 7
Evidence-based Nursing Practice
Sigma Theta Tau definition:
“Integration of the best evidence available, nursing expertise, and the values and preferences of individuals, families and communities who are served”
Sigma Theta Tau International Evidence-Based Nursing Position Statement, 2005
LuAnn Tandy 2009 8
What is EBNP?
EBP is a problem-solving approach to clinical practice that incorporates the best evidence from well-designed studies, patient values and preferences and a clinician’s expertise in making decisions about patient care.
Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2005
LuAnn Tandy 2009 9
You might be practicing EBP if you…
question your practice go to the literature to determine best
practice rather than a peer Embrace change and let go of old
practices Quit saying “because that’s the way I
was taught” (30 years ago)
LuAnn Tandy 2009 10
Ways to Use EBP
Improve outcomes Increase efficiency Improve patient satisfaction Improve nurse satisfaction Improve physician satisfaction Lower costs
LuAnn Tandy 2009 11
List the Following…
Everything you have added to your practice in the last 5 years (i.e.. VAP protocol, two patient identifiers)
List things you have given up in the last five years (i.e.. Changing IV sites every other day)
LuAnn Tandy 2009 12
Interdisciplinary EBP ……different points of view
Patient
Physician
Therapist
Nurse
Administrators
Dietician
CaseManager
LuAnn Tandy 2009 13
Why EBP?
THE QUALITY OF CARE LAGS BEHIND KNOWLEDGE AND
EBP IS SEEN AS THE SOLUTION
LuAnn Tandy 2009 14
So Why are We Behind?
Knowledge Explosion
• Every 9 years the number of journals increases by……
Time it takes to move research into practice?..........
Research is not always able to be translated into practice
EBP is a way to bundle that knowledge and put it into usable interventions
LuAnn Tandy 2009 15
History of EBP
Evidence Based Practice was used by Florence Nightingale years ago.• Observation informed her on what worked and
what didn’t
1990’s EBP became a viable framework for positive clinical outcomes
Driven by cost-containment efforts that were initiated by health administrators and payers.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 16
History of EBP
Educated health care consumers expect their health care providers to be on the cutting edge and they demand high quality care and outcomes.
With the coming of the web health care consumers do their research and they may know the best treatment before the physician or the nurse.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 17
EBP: We’ve Come A Long Way Baby
In 1977 the standard of care for a patient post-op open heart surgery was to give pain medications as needed.
In 2008 our standard of care is to schedule pain medication with dosages based on the patient’s pain rating.
In 1977 family visits were restricted to 5 minutes every hour and only 2 people at a time.
In 2008 family members have unrestricted visiting privileges
LuAnn Tandy 2009 18
EBP: Then and Now
In 1977 only patients with diabetes had their blood glucose levels monitored and controlled
In 2008 all open-heart surgery patients glucose levels are maintained between 80 and 110 mg/dL.
Sendelbach, S.E. (2008) Evidence Based Practice:Then and Now, AJN, 108:10, 75-76.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 19
UNC-Chapel Hill EBP Process
LuAnn Tandy 2009 20
Evidence Based Process
ASK
• Define the question AQUIRE
• Find the evidence APPRAISE
• Evaluate the evidence APPLY
• Apply the evidence ASSESS
• Assess the outcome
LuAnn Tandy 2009 21
Evidence Based Process
ASK* AQUIRE APPRAISE APPLY ASSESS
LuAnn Tandy 2009 22
ASK :Questions arise out of our daily practice and daily life. These are a few real life examples….
Janey’s story• Sister in the hospital was febrile and
shivering
• Blankets or no blankets?
Jennifer’s story• Noticed several standards of practice in the
ICU regarding tube feedings
• When should tube feedings be held?
LuAnn Tandy 2009 23
ASK
Mary Ann’s story• Heard on CNN that you no longer need to
apply alcohol to a newborn’s umbilical cord
• Is this true?
You need to define the question in order to find the evidence• PICO is one strategy
LuAnn Tandy 2009 24
PICO
P is for patient for population I is for intervention C is for conventional treatment O is for outcome
LuAnn Tandy 2009 25
Patient or Population
How would you describe a group of patients that are similar to yours?• Primary problem, disease or co-existing
condition
• Sex, age or race
• Socio-economic situation• Country they live in
LuAnn Tandy 2009 26
Intervention
What main intervention are you considering
What do you want to do to the patient? What are the co-existing issues?
• Age
• Addictions
• Mobility
• Socio-economic concerns
LuAnn Tandy 2009 27
Comparison
What is the main alternative to compare with the intervention?
Is it better to instill normal saline into the trachea before you suction or not?
You do not always need a comparison
LuAnn Tandy 2009 28
Outcomes
What are you trying to measure? What are you trying to improve? What are you trying to do for the patient?
LuAnn Tandy 2009 29
Janey’s Story
Janey’s sister was in the hospital and had a fever and she was shivering. The nurse wanted to take away the blankets and Janey felt bad for her sister and fought to keep them. After that situation she wondered what really was the best thing to do in that situation. What is Janey’s PICO
LuAnn Tandy 2009 30
Janey’s PICO
P = In post-op patients who are febrile and shivering
I = is taking away the patient’s blankets C = or allowing them to keep the
blankets O = more effective in reducing the fever?
LuAnn Tandy 2009 31
Mary Ann’s Story
Mary Ann was driving to work one day to her job in the labor and delivery department. On the radio she heard that it was no longer necessary to apply alcohol to the newborn’s umbilical cord, you could just use soap and water.
What is Mary Ann’s PICO?
LuAnn Tandy 2009 32
Mary Ann’s PICO
P = In newborn’s I = is soap and water C = better than alcohol O = in preventing infection of the
umbilical cord?
LuAnn Tandy 2009 33
PICO
Think of your EBP question and write it down
LuAnn Tandy 2009 34
Evidence Based Process according to UNC-Chapel Hill
ASK
AQUIRE* APPRAISE APPLY ASSESS
LuAnn Tandy 2009 35
ACQUIRE: Selecting the Resources and Conducting the Search
Locating the highest quality and relevant information from the medical literature to answer your question
How do you find the literature? How do you know the literature is of the
highest quality?• By determining the levels of evidence.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 36
DETERMINING THE LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
Level I: Evidence from a systematic review or meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or evidence based clinical practice guidelines based on systematic reviews of RCTs.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 37
Systematic Reviews
A summary of evidence on a particular topic that uses a rigorous process for retrieving, critically appraising, and synthesizing studies in order to answer a question about a burning clinical question
Melnyk, 2004
LuAnn Tandy 2009 38
Meta-analysis
A systematic review that uses quantitative methods to summarize the results of multiple studies.
It produces a summary statistic
LuAnn Tandy 2009 39
Where to find Systematic Reviews
Cochrane Database Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
by Sigma Theta Tau Peer reviewed journals
LuAnn Tandy 2009 40
Levels of Evidence
Level II: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed RCT• Experimental study in which subjects are
randomly assigned to experimental and control groups.
• Randomized trial is an opportunity for anyone that fits the criteria for inclusion to have a chance to be in the study.• Pointing to names in the phone book
LuAnn Tandy 2009 41
Levels of Evidence
Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization• Without randomization you can’t assume that
subjects in the study are equal on demographic and clinical variables.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 42
Levels of Evidence
Level IV: Evidence from well-designed case-control and cohort studies• Case control study compares certain characteristics of an
individual such as a person with diabetes to the characteristics of another individual without the disease.
• This type of study is used to identify variables that might predict the condition.
• A cohort study gathers two groups on individuals, one with exposure to a disease and one without and follow them over time to measure outcomes of the disease.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 43
Levels of Evidence
Level V: Evidence from systematic review of descriptive and qualitative studies• This is similar to meta-analysis only using
qualitative studies
LuAnn Tandy 2009 44
Levels of Evidence
Level VI: Evidence from a single descriptive study
Level VII: Evidence from the opinion of authorities and/or reports of expert committees
LuAnn Tandy 2009 45
Issues with Evidence
Too much Too little Same author publishes all the studies Only vendor research
LuAnn Tandy 2009 46
Interpreting the Results: Statistics
Sample size Reliability Validity Significance Clinical significance
LuAnn Tandy 2009 47
Sample Size=n
Number of people in the study The larger the better Determining a good sample size
depends upon the size of the population that is being studied.
Sometimes it’s a small sample size but if the whole population is in the study, then that means you sampled 100%
LuAnn Tandy 2009 48
Significance = p
A good significance level is between <.01 and .05 in most cases
Significance is the risk of error we are willing to accept and still say our results are correct
.05 means that 95 times out of 100 “IT” works .01 means that 99 times our of 100 “IT”
works
LuAnn Tandy 2009 49
Reliability
Reliability means that the tool you used to measure results in your research study will measure the same way every time.
You wouldn’t want to use a tape measure that stretches.
You might stretch it more one time than you do the next.
Look for clues that they didn’t measure things the same way every time
LuAnn Tandy 2009 50
Validity
When research is valid it means that the tool used to measure the results measures what it is supposed to measure.
You don’t want to use a tape measure to weigh a baby. It measures inches not pounds.
Look for clues that they didn’t use the right tool to measure their results.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 51
Clinical Significance
Sometimes you don’t need a .01 to a .05 significance to be clinically significant.
Sometimes a study isn’t statistically significant, but it made something better
For example: extremely depressed people became less depressed but the depression scale didn’t show that it was statistically significant. They got better, but they didn’t get relieved of their depression to equal normal.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 52
Evidence Based Process according to UNC-Chapel Hill
ASK AQUIRE APPRAISE
APPLY* ASSESS
LuAnn Tandy 2009 53
APPLY
Application is the step where you integrate the evidence with your clinical expertise and the unique needs and values of your patient/situation• Once you have gathered your evidence and
you have determined that it is of the highest quality you can find, you must match it to the patient, situation, and organizational environment.
LuAnn Tandy 2009 54
APPLICATION….
LuAnn Tandy 2009 55
APPLY
Match the evidence to the patient or population• Patient’s religious beliefs
Match the evidence to the situation• USA versus a third world country
Match the evidence to the organizational culture• Physician culture, economic issues
LuAnn Tandy 2009 56
Evidence Based Process according to UNC-Chapel Hill
ASK AQUIRE APPRAISE APPLY
ASSESS*
LuAnn Tandy 2009 57
ASSESS
Determine outcomes Develop short and long term goals Gather feedback Monitor costs/cost savings Determine success Celebrate success Share your success
LuAnn Tandy 2009 58
Evidence Based Process in Summary
ASK AQUIRE APPRAISE APPLYASSESS
LuAnn Tandy 2009 59
Examples of Real Staff Nurse Projects….
LuAnn Tandy 2009 60
Stories: Janey’s Story
Janey wanted to know if it was better to let her sister have all the blankets she wanted or if she should take them away.
Results: vote• Issues with the literature review
• Surveyed current standard of practice
• Implemented into organizations post-op surgery protocol and fever protocol
• No cost
LuAnn Tandy 2009 61
Jennifer’s Story
Jennifer noticed there was a different standard of care between nurses in regards to when to hold a tube feeding in the ICU.• What is the PICO
• Issue with the literature search
• Survey of unit nurses
• Results
• Organizational climate concerns
• Interdisciplinary focus
LuAnn Tandy 2009 62
Mary Ann’s Story
Heard on CNN that she no longer needed to use alcohol on newborn umbilical cords and no longer need to teach mom’s to do it at home
Results? Vote• Issues in the literature
• Application of findings
• Expertise
LuAnn Tandy 2009 63
Sharon’s Story
Sharon noticed that her IV team members were using different amounts of t-PA to clear central line blockages.
What is the PICO? Results: Vote
• Working with peers
• Cost savings
LuAnn Tandy 2009 64
Donna’s Story
In Donna’s unit a physician wanted to start using rectal tubes and she didn’t know much about them• What is the PICO?
• Issues with the literature
• What being knowledgeable about the research can do for you
LuAnn Tandy 2009 65
Outcomes
Increased Patient Satisfaction Increased Nurse Satisfaction Improved Care Save nurses time Standardize care Improve nurse confidence Reduce cost Improved Quality Improved efficiency
LuAnn Tandy 2009 66
Point to Ponder
Traveling naked into the land of uncertainty allows for another kind of learning, a learning that helps us forget what we know and discover what we need. It is this journey that leads to the discovery of what is needed to help us create the future…Robert E. Quinn
P 123 in Quantum Leadership by Porter-O’Grady & Malloch 2003
LuAnn Tandy 2009 67
Levels of Evidence- Melnyk, 2004
Level I: Evidence from a systematic review or meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or evidence based clinical practice guidelines based on systematic reviews of RCTs.
Level II: Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed RCT Level III: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials
without randomization Level IV: Evidence from well-designed case-control and cohort
studies Level V: Evidence from systematic review of descriptive and
qualitative studies Level VI: Evidence from a single descriptive study Level VII: Evidence from the opinion of authorities and/or reports
of expert committees
LuAnn Tandy 2009 68
Evidence Based Process-UNC-Chapel Hill
ASK• Define the question
AQUIRE• Find the evidence
APPRAISE• Evaluate the evidence
APPLY• Apply the evidence
ASSESS• Assess the outcome
LuAnn Tandy 2009 69
PICO- UNC-Chapel Hill P is for patient for population
• describe a patient or group of patients that are similar to yours I is for intervention
• What main intervention are you considering?
• What do you want to do to the patient? C is for conventional treatment
• What is the main alternative to compare with the intervention?
• You do not always need a comparison O is for outcome
• What are you trying to measure?
• What are you trying to improve?
• What are you trying to do for the patient?