LUMS WORKSHOPLUMS WORKSHOP

2 NOVEMBER 20072 NOVEMBER 2007

AGENDAAGENDA

1.1. WELCOMEWELCOME2.2. PURPOSE OF WORKSHOPPURPOSE OF WORKSHOP3.3. STATUS QUOSTATUS QUO

Scheme ExtensionsScheme ExtensionsR293 TownshipsR293 TownshipsUpdating of SchemesUpdating of SchemesConsolidation of SchemesConsolidation of SchemesSDPsSDPs/Precinct Plans//Precinct Plans/LAPsLAPsPilot ProjectsPilot ProjectsDefinitions/April 2005(B)Definitions/April 2005(B)Conversion of Schemes intoConversion of Schemes intoLUMSLUMS- Document & Maps- Document & Maps

There Are There Are 3030 Town Planning Town PlanningSchemeScheme

In In EthekwiniEthekwini11 North; 1 Central; 1 Outer-west;11 North; 1 Central; 1 Outer-west;

9 South; 8 Inner-west9 South; 8 Inner-west

1/07/20031/07/2003 Report to Development Report to Development Planning & Town PlanningPlanning & Town Planning

Sub-CommitteeSub-Committee7/07/20047/07/2004 Province Province –– Supported & Supported &

Refused as per theRefused as per theinformation information pack (which was sentpack (which was sentto you)to you)

Province also directed the Council toProvince also directed the Council toseek approval from DAEA prior toseek approval from DAEA prior tothem further considering the matter.them further considering the matter.

Meetings on-going with AgricultureMeetings on-going with Agricultureas per your pack and the Frameworkas per your pack and the FrameworkTeam too has met with DAEA but toTeam too has met with DAEA but tono avail.no avail.

Process started 2003 Process started 2003 –– to date little to date littleprogressprogress

A PRIMARY SCHEME FORA PRIMARY SCHEME FORR293sR293s

9/11/20049/11/2004 NtuzumaNtuzumaKwaMashuKwaMashuUmlaziUmlaziMagabeniMagabeniKwaNdengeziKwaNdengeziMpumulangaMpumulangaKwaMakuthaKwaMakutha

Progress To DateProgress To Date::

All parts of recommendation All parts of recommendation actionedactioned. All of. All ofthe maps & controls sent to Provincethe maps & controls sent to Province2005 2005 –– to date no response to date no response –– ““NoNocapacity to actioncapacity to action””..

Copies of Maps to be DisplayedCopies of Maps to be Displayed

Definitions adopted as well.Definitions adopted as well.

UPDATING OF SCHEMESUPDATING OF SCHEMES

1.1. NORTHNORTH –– 11 SCHEMES 11 SCHEMES

•• Updating of 5 Schemes startedUpdating of 5 Schemes startedMarch 2007March 2007

•• –– Completed October 2007 Completed October 2007

•• - Delivery date February 2008- Delivery date February 2008

•• - Completed - Completed 66 Schemes in Schemes in

October 2007 October 2007

•• Remaining 5 Schemes to beRemaining 5 Schemes to becompleted by May 2008completed by May 2008

2.2. Updating of Updating of 99 SOUTHSOUTH SCHEMES SCHEMES

•• - Started in July 2007 - Started in July 2007 –– 40% 40%completecomplete

•• - Delivery date March 2008- Delivery date March 2008

3.3. CENTRAL, INNER-WEST &CENTRAL, INNER-WEST &COWTPSCOWTPS –– on going on going

CONSOLIDATION OFCONSOLIDATION OFSCHEMESSCHEMES

COWTPSCOWTPS Questionable Questionable –– Province Provinceconcerned concerned about process & about process &scheme map scheme map doesn doesn ttcorrespond to Scheme correspond to Scheme Clauses.Clauses.

•• Also Also GillitsGillits/Hillcrest Plan /Hillcrest Plan notnot included included–– status of such? status of such?

•• Other Framework Plans that mightOther Framework Plans that mighthave been excluded.have been excluded.

•• Subdivision Policy Subdivision Policy notnot translated into translated intoscheme.scheme.

•• Other policies not included.Other policies not included.

INNER-WESTINNER-WEST Appointed consultant. Appointed consultant.Work done but need to get dedicatedWork done but need to get dedicatedperson to deliver an updated &person to deliver an updated &consolidation scheme.consolidation scheme.

10% of work 10% of workThe six updated schemes for the NorthThe six updated schemes for the North

will now be consolidated by Marchwill now be consolidated by March

SDP/Precinct Plans/SDP/Precinct Plans/LAPsLAPs

ITERATIVE PROCESS ITERATIVE PROCESS –– CYCLIC CYCLIC

ROD

Development Framework Plan

Design Review Panel

Precinct Plan

Site Development Plans

Building Plan Submission

PILOT PROJECTSPILOT PROJECTS

•• 1.1. BRICKFIELD/SPARKS ROADBRICKFIELD/SPARKS ROAD

•• 2.2. OTTAWA OTTAWA –– OLD MAIN ROAD OLD MAIN ROAD

•• 3.3. GLENUGIEGLENUGIE

•• 4.4. REVIEW OF TOTI SCHEMEREVIEW OF TOTI SCHEME

Progress to DateProgress to DateBrickfield/Sparks Brickfield/Sparks –– (tests form-based (tests form-based

planning)planning)Framework Plan Adopted by Council (2006)Framework Plan Adopted by Council (2006)(tests form-based planning)(tests form-based planning)Precinct Plan to Committee (2007)Precinct Plan to Committee (2007)LUMS (March 2008)LUMS (March 2008)

None of the other Pilot Projects haveNone of the other Pilot Projects haveprogressed.progressed.

- Innovative ways in which to present our- Innovative ways in which to present ourschemes schemes –– layers, text layers, text

DEFINITIONSDEFINITIONS

LUMS DEFINITIONSLUMS DEFINITIONSAPPROVED 2004APPROVED 2004

CANNOT BE USED UNTILCANNOT BE USED UNTILCONVERSION INTO LUMSCONVERSION INTO LUMS

POLICIES APPROVED TOPOLICIES APPROVED TODATEDATE

•• B&BB&B

•• Guest HouseGuest House

•• AncilliaryAncilliary Unit Unit

•• Cell mast PolicyCell mast Policy

•• Home BusinessHome Business

Policies in ProgressPolicies in Progress::

•• Sidewalk CafesSidewalk Cafes

•• Container PolicyContainer Policy

CONVERSION INTO LUMSCONVERSION INTO LUMS

•• DEPENDANT ON DEPENDANT ON SDPsSDPs,,LAPsLAPs, Precinct Plans, Precinct Plans

•• DEPENDANT ON FORMATDEPENDANT ON FORMAT