Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | montgomery-arjun |
View: | 35 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 20051
Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF) Outline
Organizational ChartFacility Design Criteria, User’s Requirements and LayoutPrevious WorkStatus to Date (Site preparation, Title II and Title III)Budget and Schedule Technical Challenges (Risks)ES&H IssuesManagement ChallengesPath Forward
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 20052
Organizational ChartMagnetic Measurement Facility (MMF)
Robert Ruland – Alignment MgrZachary Wolf – User
Conventional Facilities-WBS 1.09David Saenz – Conventional Facilities ManagerJim Welch – CF Systems PhysicistJavier A. Sevilla-CF Project Engineer/CAMJo Beth Folger-CF EngineerRichard Hislop – Construction Safety ManagerAnita Malahowski –Cost/ScheduleBruce Patten – Contracts/ProcurementJesse Saldivar – CF Technical Assistance
SAFETY
Cost/Schedule
FacilityRequirements-
Scope
Project Office
ConventionalFacilities
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 20053
Facility Design Requirements
Technical Note LCLS-TN-041-Z
Space Requirements
Environmental Stability (3 areas)
Space Temperature: ± 0.1 °C short term may go up to 0.3°C if < 1Hr
Relative Humidity: 45%± 5%
Other areas: ±1°C and ±2.5°C
Vibration <0.5 microns-MM Lab
Utility Requirements
Electrical (new 800A feeder MMFBldg Upgrade)
Other (compressed air and small chiller for User’s equipment)
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 20054
MMF Facility Uses
Undulator magnet tuning – 2 magnet measuring machine test stands
Aligned with same orientation to Earth’s magnetic field as LCLS Undulator Hall.
Undulator fiducialization – large coordinate measuring machineCradle assembly areaMagnet storage/temperature acclimationWork desks in lab and office space for 2 employees
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 20055
Resultant Building Criteria
~4,800 sq. ft. floor space (inc. ~3,000 laboratory space, mech Rm) + mezzanine 1,400 sf (HVAC & Electrical)
Locate within an existing building to aid in temperature control
Adequate ceiling height for overhead cranes
Accessible for magnet delivery using trucks and forkliftsElectrical service – 800A, 480v, 3Ø
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 20056
Building 081 Location
LCLS Undulator
HallResearch Yard
PEP Ring RoadNORTH
LINAC
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 20059
New Space Allocation for Bldg. 081
SHIPPING & RECEIVING
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
VEHICLE SHOP
Offices
(N) MCC-B081
Front
Rear
(N) Fire Alarm Panel
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200510
MMF Ground Floor Plan
Coordinate Measuring
Area~ 1,000 ft. sq.
Cradle Assembly Area~325 ft. sq.
Magnet Loading and Storage~850 ft. sq.
± 2.5°C
± 1°C, 45% RH ±5
Magnet Measuring Lab
~1,800 ft. sq.
± 0.1°C, 45%RH ±5
Rear
Mechanical Room~256 ft. sq.
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200511
Mezzanine Floor Plan
Mezzanine for Mechanical/ElectricalEquipment in Conditioned space
4 Air handling Units1 Motor Control Center,X-trmr, Panels,1 small CompressorHVAC Control Panel
Equipment:
Rear
MCC
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200512
Rear Elevation-MMF
Roll up door for magnets delivery
Mechanical Access
Staff Access
Mezzanine
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200513
User’s Layout (By R. Ruland, Oct, 2004)
Floor plan divided into three functional areasMagnetic Measurements (± 0.1º C)Fiducialization and Assembly (± 1º C)Storage (± 2.5º C)
Test stand lay-out is driven by requirement to match the Earth Magnetic Field conditions in lab to Undulator Hall, i.e. azimuth and gap orientation need to be identical
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200514
Previous Work
Title I Drawings and Specifications –completed by JE
External Review October 14, 2004 Report with recommendations
Internal reviews (SLAC)Facility’s User (Metrology Group)
50% and 100% drawings and Specs: ES&H, Citizen’s Committees
Conventional Experimental Facilities Dept (CEF) old SEM
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200515
Status
Title II Drawings and Specifications –prepared by JEIssued for Construction-March 11, 05In-progress: Review and “Final” approval by SLAC’ Citizens Committees and ES&H- Obtained approval for bidding
Site Preparation Work (activities delayed)Resources allocation Accident related (CEF support)On-going: Design and coordination (new storage carrousel, shelving and Haz Material storage relocation, move occupants new electrical feeder to building, FA system and data network upgrade)
Title III Procurement: Select only “qualified” subcontractors based on a “criteria” Develop and implement a “Commissioning” plan Beneficial Occupancy: Feb’06
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200516
Budget & Schedule
Title III Including Site Preparation $2.04M
(excludes: fire alarm building upgrade B081 and some relocation costs)
Bidding and AwardApril – June 2005- Site visit: April 7, 2005Bids due May 5 and Award May 27, 2005
Construction and CommissioningExecution: Mid June 05 – February 06Beneficial Occupancy to Project Office Feb-06
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200518
Cost Estimate- WBS1.09.03.02Estimated Total Cost $2.04M
Construction Subcontract: $ 1,493 KSite Preparation & Electrical LLP: $ 546KAllocated Contingency: 30% construction-not included
Commissioning &Testing
$59,451- 3%
Interiors & Cranes$332,948- 16%
Site Prep & LLP $545,652- 27%
Structure & Foundation,
$169,583- 8%
Demolition $41,872- 2%
HVAC &Mechanical
$566,814- 28%
Electrical $321,835- 16%
Demolition
Mechanical-HVAC
Electrical
Structure andFoundation
Testing &Commissioning
Interiors and Cranes
Site Preparation
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200519
Risks
Internal technical: Not achieving the Temperature and Stability requirements
Plan: Design reviews, constructability and commissioning plan
Internal non-technical: Delays in the BO date Plan: Use good and effective Project Management approach, and select only “qualified” contractors including subs
Internal non-technical: Safety accidentsPlan: Pre-qualification of contractors, strict implementation and close monitoring of Safety Plans and Procedures
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200520
ES&H Issues Demolition activities
Site Preparation: Excavation Excavation Permit for Relocation of Haz Mat Storage was obtained Sampling of soil by ES&H
Air quality-BAAQMD-not applicableConstruction Activity Hazards
Construction Safety oversight by LCLS Safety Manager, LCLS Divisional ES&H Coordinator, SLAC Safety OSHA Inspectors and by SLAC trained UTR. Subcontractors will be required to staff project with a Construction Safety ProfessionalIncludes preparation of Pre-work Hazard Analysis, Job Hazard Analysis and Mitigation (JHAM) and all applicable DOE and Federal Safety Regulations.
RadiationNone
Hoisting/RiggingCitizens’ Committee and/or Hoisting/Rigging inspector will review and approve the Subcontractor’s Rigging Plan for the testing, commissioning and acceptance of new cranes
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200521
Management Challenges
Cost/Schedule RisksCost estimate based on Jacobs estimate– confirmation when bids are received from subcontractors (Factors: Market conditions, qualification criteria and NEW Safety Requirements).Schedule
Coordination and Support from other SLAC’s Departments (ES&H, Stores, CEF)
SLAC policy changes in the wake of 10/11/04 electrical accident are still being developed. (UTR responsibilities, Authority and Oversight may change, etc.)
Javier A. Sevilla
April 5, 200522
Path Forward
Enforce Safety Regulations to All Sub-ContractorsImplement Criteria Selection for Bidding and Construction to ALL Sub-ContractorsCoordinate and Complete ALL Site Preparation activities
Management and Lab support
Construction and Commissioningo Schedule and Cost Controlso Strict compliance with Drawings and Specificationso Execute an integrated verification of: operational performance,
testing, complete documentation and training of SLAC personnel, which will operate and maintain this Facility.