+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: catanescu-alexandru-laurentiu
View: 230 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 34

Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    1/34

    Example:

    Magnetostrictive Transducer

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    2/34

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    3/34

    Magnetostrictive Transducer

    Steel housing

    (for magnetic flux path)

    Drive coil (homogenous

    current carrying element)

    Magnetostrictive rod

    (active material)

    Sectional view of a cylindrical transducer

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    4/34

    2D axial symmetry used to reduce computation time.

    Non-linear constitutive relation between magnetostriction and

    magnetic field is implemented. The material is assumed to be in

    a pre-stressed state that would yield maximum magnetostriction.

    Non-linear B-H curve is used to model realistic magnetic

    behavior including saturation effect at high magnetic fields.

    The drive coil is modeled as a homogenized current carrying

    domain. Individual wires are not resolved.

    Magnetostatic modeling is performed. A parametric sweep of

    current density in the drive coil is used to demonstrate the non-

    linear magnetostriction vs. magnetic field.

    Model Features

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    5/34

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    6/34

    MagnetostrictionEffect of magnetic field

    The free strain is often

    modeled using linear

    constitutive relation:

    = dH

    where dis called the piezo-

    magnetic strain coefficient.

    In reality, the free strain

    (magnetostriction) has anon-linear dependence on

    the applied magnetic field

    and the mechanical stress

    in the material.

    Source:http://www.etrema-usa.com/documents/Terfenol.pdf

    Pre-stress

    Magnetostriction vs. Magnetic field at various pre-stresses

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    7/34

    AC/DC Module> Statics,

    Magnetic> Azimuthal

    Induction Currents,

    Vector Potential

    Calculates the azimuthal

    magnetic potential (A) for

    a given azimuthal current

    density (J).

    The magnetic problem issolved to find the spatial

    distribution of

    magnetization (Mr_emqa,

    Mz_emqa).

    Physics 1Electromagnetic

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    8/34

    Structural Mechanics

    Module> Axial

    Symmetry, Stress-Strain

    > Static analysis

    Magnetostriction

    (Lambda_r, Lambda_z)

    values are assigned as

    initial strains (ri, zi) in the

    magnetostrictive rod.

    This creates a one-way

    coupling of the structural

    problem with the magnetic

    problem.

    Physics 2Structural

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    9/34

    Geometry

    Steel housing

    Air domain(required to view realistic

    magnetic flux path)

    Drive coil

    Magnetostrictive rod

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    10/34

    Steel housing

    (Subdomain 2)

    Dimensions Air(Subdomains 1, 4, 6)

    Current-carrying coil(Subdomain 5)

    Magnetostrictive rod

    (Subdomain 3)

    Magnetostrictive rod- Radius = 3 mm

    - Height = 50 mm

    Coil

    - Radius = 3 mm

    - Height = 50 mm Steel housing

    Head and base plates

    - Radius = 20 mm

    - Height = 5 mm

    Side wall- Thickness = 5 mm

    - Height = 50 mm

    Air domain

    - Radius = 90 mm

    - Height = 180 mm

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    11/34

    Options > Constants

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    12/34

    Magnetostriction (i) along direction idepends on the magnetostriction

    constant (s) and the magnetization direction cosine (

    i).

    The direction cosine is the ratio of magnetization along the required direction

    (Mi) and the saturation magnetization (M

    s) of the material.

    The negative 1/3 term indicates that the magnetic moments are randomlyoriented in the material in the absence of any magnetic field.

    We will not use this 1/3 term because we have assumed that the material is

    sufficiently pre-stressed such that all magnetic moments are perpendicular to

    the direction of magnetization at the beginning of the magnetization process.

    Calculation of magnetostriction

    3

    1

    M

    M

    2

    3

    3

    1

    2

    32

    s

    i

    s

    2

    isi

    Ref: S. Chikazumi, Physics

    of Ferromagnetism, 2nded.,

    Clarendon Press.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    13/34

    Options > Expressions > Subdomain Expressions

    Note:Constitutive relation is applied only to subdomain 3

    which represents the magnetostrictive material.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    14/34

    Make sure the application mode emqais selected from

    the Multiphysicsmenu.

    Subdomains 1, 4, 6No changes are necessary.

    Subdomain 2- Choose Library Materialas Soft iron

    (with losses). Choose constitutive relation (HB) as H

    = f(|B|)eB.

    Go to Options > Materials/Coefficients library.

    Expand Model(1) and click on Soft Iron (with

    losses)(mat1). In the sigmaedit field, type 0.Click

    Applyand OK.

    Subdomain settings - Magnetic

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    15/34

    Subdomain settings - Magnetic

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    16/34

    Subdomain 3Assume a non-linear but isotropic

    magnetostrictive material. Choose constitutive

    relation (HB) as H = f(|B|)eB. Type

    HBFe(normB_emqa[1/T])[A/m]in the Hedit field.

    HBFe is a user-defined function to model the non-

    linear B-H curve in the magnetostrictive material.

    The B-H curve function can be created by the userusing experimental material data. User-defined

    functions are created from Options > Functions.

    Subdomain settings - Magnetic

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    17/34

    Subdomain settings - Magnetic

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    18/34

    Non-linear B-H Curve

    Interpolation

    table

    B

    H

    H = HBFe(B)

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    19/34

    Subdomain 5 - Type J0in the Jeedit field.

    Note that the electrical conductivity in subdomain 5 is

    set to zero because in reality the turns of wires in adrive coil are insulated from each other so that the

    current only flows along the circumferential direction ()

    and not along the axial (z) and radial (r) directions.

    Subdomain settings - Magnetic

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    20/34

    Subdomain settings - Magnetic

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    21/34

    Boundary settings - Magnetic

    Axial Symmetry(Boundaries 1, 3, 5, 7, 9)

    Magnetic Insulation(Boundaries 2, 11, 26)

    All other boundaries

    - Continuity

    This boundary conditionsets the magnetic vector

    potential A= zero. This is

    an approximation for a

    boundary at infinity. The

    user may also use infinite

    elementsfor a more high

    fidelity model. See the

    AC/DC Module User's

    Guide for information on

    infinite elements.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    22/34

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    23/34

    Subdomain settings - Structural

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    24/34

    Subdomain 3Add the magnetostriction (Lambda_r andLambda_z) using the Initial Stress and Straintab.

    Subdomain settings - Structural

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    25/34

    Why initial strain?

    ii

    C

    Generalized Hookes Law

    Magnetostriction does not produce stress in the material

    unless it is constrained.

    Modeling magnetostriction as an initial strain ensures

    that the material remains stress-free when the strain in

    the body is the same as the magnetostriction.

    []Stress

    [C]Stiffness

    []Strain

    [i] - Initial strain

    [i] - Initial stress

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    26/34

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    27/34

    It is desired to calculate the magneticquantities in the magnetostrictive rod

    and steel housing with high accuracy.

    Go to the Subdomaintab under Mesh

    > Free Mesh Parameters. Type 1e-3inthe Maximum element sizeedit field

    for subdomains 2 and 3.

    Go to the Boundarytab under Free

    Mesh Parameters. Type 1e-4in theMaximum element sizeedit field for

    boundaries 6 and 8.

    Click the Remeshbutton followed by

    OKbutton.

    Meshing

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    28/34

    Results

    Uniform magnetic flux

    density inside the

    magnetostrictive rod along

    the centerline (r = 0).

    Flux density tapers off

    sharply through the steel

    head and base plates.

    Magnetic flux concentration through

    the magnetostrictive rod and steel

    housing depicted by the streamlines.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    29/34

    Results

    Uniform axial strain (~ 1.47e-4)

    in the magnetostrictive rod due

    to magnetostriction.

    Zero axial stress in the

    magnetostrictive rod due

    to free strain.

    Uniform axial strain in the

    magnetostrictive rod along

    the centerline (r = 0)

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    30/34

    Creating the non-linear vs.Hcurve

    It is desired to find out the free strain of the

    magnetostrictive material or displacement obtained from

    the transducer as a function of the input current or input

    magnetic field for most applications.

    To find this out we need to perform a parametric

    analysis.

    Assume J0 varies quasi-statically so that there is no

    inductive effect and no skin-effect.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    31/34

    Solve > Solver Parameters

    Use the settings

    shown here and

    click OK.

    Click the =

    button to solve.

    It will probably

    take a fewminutes.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    32/34

    Plotting the non-linear vs.Hcurve

    Postprocessing > Plot Parameters> Domain Plot Parameters.

    In the Generaltab, make sure all the

    solutions are selected in the

    Solutions to usearea.

    Select the Pointtab and choose

    point 4.

    In the y-axis dataarea, type

    Lambda_zin the Expressionedit

    field.

    In the x-axis dataarea, select the

    Expression radio button and then

    click on the Expression button. Type

    Hz_emqa.

    Non-linear magnetostriction vs.

    magnetic field curve along the

    axial direction.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    33/34

    Plotting the displacement vs. input current density

    Postprocessing > Plot Parameters> Domain Plot Parameters.

    In the Generaltab, make sure all the

    solutions are selected in the

    Solutions to usearea.

    Select the Pointtab and choose

    point 4.

    In the y-axis dataarea, type win the

    Expressionedit field.

    In the x-axis dataarea, select the

    Expression radio button and then

    click on the Expression button. Type

    J0.

    Non-linear axial displacement vs.

    input current density.

  • 8/11/2019 Magnetostrictive Transducer 1

    34/34

    References

    1. C. Mudivarthi, S. Datta, J. Atulasimha and A. B. Flatau, A bidirectionally

    coupled magnetoelastic model and its validation using a Galfenol

    unimorph sensor, Smart Materials and Structures, 17035005 (8pp),

    2008.

    http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0964-1726/17/3/035005/

    2. F. Graham, Development and Validation of a Bidirectionally Coupled

    Magnetoelastic FEM Model for Current Driven Magnetostrictive Devices,

    M.S. Thesis, Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College

    Park, USA, 2009.

    http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum/handle/1903/9354

    http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0964-1726/17/3/035005/http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum/handle/1903/9354http://www.lib.umd.edu/drum/handle/1903/9354http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0964-1726/17/3/035005/http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0964-1726/17/3/035005/http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0964-1726/17/3/035005/

Recommended