Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Malte Hildebrandt MEG Review Meeting, 20th Feb 2008
Drift Chamber System• hardware status Run 2007• shutdown activities 2008
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Installation 2007
• main changes / improvements compared to installation in 2006:
• modifications of support structure ↔ clearance to N2 bag
• new design of gas manifolds ↔ less influence on e+ trajectory
• placed at larger lzl - and larger r - coordinate
• different material (0.5 mm Al → 1 mm PVC)
• 16 / 16 drift chamber modules
• as in 2006: each dc module tested in test setup „aquarium“ (He / C2H6 inside module and Helium outside module)
• cosmics run in lab, modules mounted in support structure→ sort out cable mismatch „inside COBRA“
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Drift Chamber System
gas manifold ds
„MEG“ target
flange to BTS
dc support
dc15 dc00
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Alignment – Part 1
• measurement of identification marks wrt reference bolts
(3D touch-sensitive sensor in mechanical workshop)
reference bolt
reference bolt
„connection“ to position of• anode wires and • cathode pattern
(x-y-measuring table in lab)
identification mark identification mark
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Alignment – Part 2
reference holes in support structure
identification marks on dc module
• surveying of identification marks wrt support structure and beam axis
( survey with theodolite by survey group)
→ 2 vectors:
• connecting line of adjacent holes
• middle of connecting line to identification mark(chamber plane)
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Chamber Shift
→ ChamberShift in data base
• corrections in x, y, zup to 2 mm
• corrections along vectorof chamber planeup to 6 mrad
-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
-350 -250 -150 -50 50 150 250 350
-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
-350 -250 -150 -50 50 150 250 350
upstream
downstream
displacement x50
displacement x50
• observation after measurement and survey:
• shift of modules
• tilt of modules
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Wire Displacement
• mechanical deformation ofdc module / support structure ?
→ survey dc + target system before installation („hanging“)
→ survey after installation in COBRA („sitting“ )
• deviation (wire#) in R and Z of expected hit point to fitted track(including ChamberShift data)
→ measure of wire displacement before alignment procedure
→ after 3 iterations: < 0.01 cm shift tilt
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Survey of Target
• observation after dc installation (Aug. 2007): target slightly misaligned
→ „survey“ with vertical and horizontal laser projections
→ photos with digital camera and geometrical analysis (PRK)
→ numbers are included in MC
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Target
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Survey of Target
• observation after dc installation (Aug. 2007): target slightly misaligned
→ „survey“ with vertical and horizontal laser projections
→ photos with digital camera and geometrical analysis (PRK)
→ numbers are included in MC
• before dismounting dc system (Jan. 2008):
→ photogrammetric survey by survey group (no time for theodolite survey)
• several photos from different positions (~1h)
• analysis later with special software and camera calibration
• but: maybe problems due to small angles and glancing intersections
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Photogrammetric Survey of Target
ruler (absolute scale)
reference points
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Survey of Target
• observation after dc installation (Aug. 2007): target slightly misaligned
→ „survey“ with vertical + horizontal laser projections
→ photos with digital camera, geometrical analysis (PRK)
→ numbers are included in MC
• before dismounting dc system (Jan. 2008):
→ photogrammetric survey by survey group (no time for theodolite survey)
• several photos from different positions (~1h)
• analysis later with special software and camera calibration
• but: maybe problems due to small angles and glancing intersections
before Run 2008: • identification marks on target / frame
• schedule theodolite survey of dc + target (~1d)
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Drift Chamber Operation
• Cosmic Ray Run 11.-17.10.2007 (1.2 M events)
• z - calibration
• wire positioning, alignment
• gain calibration
• standalone Michel Run (08.-14.11.2007)
→ ultra low (3 M + 2 M events) • x t - calibration
• Michel spectrum
→ low (2 M events) • confirm stable dc operationat „normal“ beam intensity
• tune tracking algorithm
• startup / de-bugging phase (noise, HV & SlowControl vs magnetic field)
• MEG Run
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Drift Chamber Operation
• standalone Michel Run (08.-14.11.2007)
→ ultra low (3 M + 2 M events) • x t - calibration
• Michel spectrum
→ normal (2 M events) • confirm stable dc operationat „normal“ beam intensity
• tune tracking algorithm
• startup / de-bugging phase (noise, HV & SlowControl vs magnetic field)
• MEG Run
• Cosmic Ray Run 11.-17.10.2007 (1.2 M events)
• z - calibration
• wire positioning, alignment
• gain calibration
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Disconnected Cables
• missing LV dc6u
• missing signal channels
1 anode wire = signals from both sides (out of 288) 3 anode signals = signal from one side (out of 576) 23 cathode / hood signals (out of 1152)(only one cell with 2 missing cathode signals)
Remark: everything fine during startup, most likely explanation for mishap: • LV cables: stiff and rigid • signal cables: slippery
→ slight mechanical tension→ very slow movement, even we fixed with tape and cable ties→ finally connector slips out of socket
→ improved strain-relief of cables on pcb(design finished, parts under construction)
→ additional test after inserting dc support structure, before closing endcap
disconnected patchpanel insideopen DS endcap
Jan 2008
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
O2 SensorsUS endcapDS endcap
dc
O2
O2
O2 O2
O2
• Alphasens O2 sensors : • metal / air battery: I proportional O2 concentration
→ calibration with 20.8 % O2 → U0 = R·I0
→ “aging”: exposed to 20.8 % O2 → I0 = I0(t)
• powerfull tool to monitor Helium concentration inside COBRA and to „identify“ leaks
He_in He_in
He_out He_out
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
DC HV Problems
• 6 dc modules showed frequent HV trips (1850V) when cHe_COBRA >97 %
MC: influence on • stopping distribution and • reconstructed momentum resolution of e+
→ decission: air admixture to „adjust“ 95 % < cHe_COBRA < 97 %
• but: due to trips slight deterioration during run… → situation end of run: 16 / 32 planes operated at 1850 V
11 / 32 planes operated at 1800 V 5 / 32 planes not operational (<1700 V)
→ recent activities (since beginning of January):• dc support structure moved out of COBRA
• test setup „aquarium“ installed and operational in E5• „weakest“ dc module dismounted → optical inspection
suspicious spot: sealing of HV connection to pcb
outside
?
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
HV Connection
anode decoupling capacitorshood readouthood Vernier pattern
pre-amplifier cardsHV connection to pcb
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Anode PCB
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Next Steps
• 1st test with „weakest“ dc module in „aquarium“: HV trip reproduced → new sealing
→ stable operation with 1875 V at 99.7 % Helium in „aquarium“ (O2-sensor)
• all dc modules with planes labled „not operational“:• dismount from support structure → optical inspection• redo sealing of HV connection• confirm HV stability in test setup „aquarium“
next steps:
• no activities scheduled for planes operated at 1850 V
→ depending on success of these activities:
• all dc modules with planes operated at 1800 V: • dismount from support structure • check / redo sealing (• confirm HV stability in aquarium)
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
y = 2.710E-04x
R2 = 1.000E+00
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0.0E+00 5.0E+06 1.0E+07 1.5E+07 2.0E+07 2.5E+07 3.0E+07 3.5E+07
Current vs Beam Rate
• two different settings for stopping rate :
ultra low: 5.0 · 106 /s
normal : 3.1 · 107 /s
dc4AIanode [nA]
stop rate [Hz]
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
but: slight saturation visible
• only ~10 V voltage dropdue to 1 M resistor and10 A
→ saturation due to high gain and space charge effects ?
→ analysis of pulse heigth or charge distribution 6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900
Current vs HV
dc4A, low rateln(Ianode)
HV [V]
• normal stopping rate 3.1 · 107 /s
• HV scan from 1600 V to 1850 V
→ Ianode shows exponential relation as a function of HV !
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Wire Hit Rates
→ why is 1st cell of plane A and plane B much higher than expected ?
→ why is 1st cell of plane A higher than 1st cell of plane B ?
data
MC
•
H.Nishigushi
normal rate, dc08
cut condition for charge : > 0.6 V·ns
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Drift Lines from Track
A B
anode wire potential wire (GND)
A B
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Drift Lines from Track
A B
anode wire
A B
potential wire (GND)
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Drift Lines from Track
A B
anode wire
A B
potential wire (GND)
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Drift Lines from Track
A B
anode wire
A B
potential wire (GND)
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
MC + Data
MCH.Nishigushi
data•
normal rate, dc08
cut condition for charge : > 0.6 V·ns
→ after implementation of „cell 0 geometry“ in MC:
→ still some work to do understand further discrepancies
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Charge Distribution
run 6092, 6093, low rate
H.Nishigushi
wire 0 wire 1
wire 8
wire 2
wire 3 wire 4 wire 5
wire 6 wire 7
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Current, Gas Gain
• dE/dX, → energy deposition along track
w-value → primary ionisation along track
track length → primary ionisation per traversing particle
rate, surface → Iprimary ionisation
Iprimary ionisation x gas gain = Imeasured
data: • (single wire hite rates) too large due to contributions of small pulses on wire 0
• estimation of correction factor 0.9 (Ch.Topchyan):
→ gas gain ~4.4·105 @ 1850 V
What is the reason for the small pulses?
• low collection efficiency? • GARFIELD
• attachment / recombination ? • data analysis
• accumulated charge (innermost anode wire): ~1 C / cm / 8 months → monitor chamber parameters
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
PSI Savety
• dc gas system: • fire protected cabinet with ventillation system to operate 50l bottle ethane
• E5 gas warning system: • in total 8 sensors:3 sensors for O2
4 sensors for C2H6
1 sensor for H2
Malte Hildebrandt
MEG Review Meeting, 20.02.2008
Conclusion
• dc hardware problems have huge impact on overall performance of
dc system
→ exchange / repair broken pre-amplifier cards
→ improve strain-relief of LV and signal cables
→ repair bad potting of HV connection on dc modules to ensureHV stability in pure Helium environment
→ in parallel: construction of 2nd spare module (dc18)remark: dc17 available in laboratory (completely tested)