+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Management Control Systems_Session2

Management Control Systems_Session2

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: nitesh-salunke
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 51

Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    1/51

    Management Control Systems

    Session 2

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    2/51

    Session 1

    Responsibility center

    Revenue & expense center

    Profit center

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    3/51

    What is a responsibility center ?

    Organization unit that is headed by a manager

    who is responsible for its activities.

    A company is a collection of responsibility

    centers

    They form a hierarchy with sections,

    departments, work shifts etc.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    4/51

    What is a responsibility center?

    In simple words: an organizational unit for

    which a manager is made responsible.

    Examples: A specific store in a chain of grocery

    stores.

    A work-station in a production line

    manufacturing automobile batteries.

    The payroll data processing center within a

    firm.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    5/51

    Nature of a responsibility center

    They exists to accomplish one or more

    purposes, termed as objectives.

    The objectives of these centers are to help

    implement the strategies set to accomplish

    the goals of the company.

    They receive inputs and performs its particular

    function, with the ultimate objective of

    transforming its inputs into outputs.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    6/51

    Measuring inputs and outputs

    In the courier example, the inputs are causal

    and direct: e.g. no. of packets received to time

    taken to deliver them.

    But, such causal and direct relationships are

    not always possible. For example, how does

    advertising contribute to increase in

    revenues?

    Or, how would you measure the contribution

    of R & D to product innovation, revenue

    generation, or cost reduction?

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    7/51

    Converting the inputs into monetary units

    Most organizations would convert the physical

    inputs into monetary units when evaluating a

    responsibility center.

    No. of units x cost of production, labor hours x

    per hour rate, etc.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    8/51

    Measuring outputs

    Measuring outputs is more difficult. This is

    because:

    Input may be extended this year but outputs

    (benefits) may be received over several years

    (e.g. employee training).

    It would be difficult to make the causal

    relationship e.g. marketing expenses, IT

    investments, accountants and generation of

    revenue and profits.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    9/51

    The input-output attributes

    Most organizations use financial controls cost,

    revenue, and profits, etc.

    However, such measures are not applicable to all

    units within an organization. For example, how would you measure the

    contribution of a production department? It can

    only be done on a cost measurement basis.

    How would you measure the contribution of a sales

    department only by revenue generated.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    10/51

    Why does an organization

    relate input to outputs?

    Because they inherently measure efficiency and effectiveness.

    Efficiency: ratio of output to inputs;

    Caution: Do not use ratio of output to input in an absolute

    sense; but, only in a comparative sense. If Dept. A is more efficient than Dept. B, do not rush to

    conclusions; examine why Dept. B is less efficient and what

    can be done about it.

    Also, comparisons are possible only if Dept. B and Dept. A usecomparable outputs and comparable inputs. You cannot

    compare advertising to accounting.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    11/51

    Efficiency

    Efficiency is generally measured by comparing

    actual costs to standard costs.

    Issues:

    Standard costs do not remain stationery.

    Recorded costs are often different from actual

    resources (costs) consumption.

    Lesson: Establishing a responsibility center is

    easy; Measuring its efficiency in a reasonable

    manner is difficult.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    12/51

    Effectiveness

    Relationship between a responsibility centers

    output and its objectives (what it was

    intended to do or perform or deliver).

    If the output contributes to satisfying the

    objectives, the more effective it is.

    The new advertising and marketing efforts has

    increased awareness and recognition of our

    product. Advertising and marketing has been

    effective.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    13/51

    Efficiency-Effectiveness

    Not a compromise

    A responsibility center must both be efficient

    and effective.

    It must use the least amount of inputs to get

    the maximum amount of output and yet

    deliver on the goals.

    A sales department was efficient in growing

    the sales by 10% without adding additional

    sales people or marketing expenses (efficient);

    however, many of the credit sales could not be

    collected (bad debts). It is ineffective.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    14/51

    Role of Profit

    The goal of every for-profit organization is earn profits

    (effectiveness).

    If the organization could use the least input to get the

    maximum earnings, profits will be high (efficiency).

    Therefore, profit is an indicator of both efficiency and

    effectiveness.

    However, not every unit within an organization earns profit

    and therefore, this measure cannot be used for allresponsibility centers.

    Therefore, an organization must establish various types of

    responsibility centers.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    15/51

    Example: A courier service (DHL)

    Courier operations dispatch trucks to pick up or deliver

    shipments from local terminals.

    It could be sent to one or more central terminals and then

    sorted and redirected.

    Success of this service would depend on:

    Service commitment to customers (on time, without damage) and

    Controlling costs

    Let us suppose that each terminal is treated as a responsibility

    center.

    How should the company measure the performance of each

    terminal, its mangers, and its employees?

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    16/51

    Measuring the performance of the

    courier-terminal responsibility center

    To focus on efficiency: we could measure no. of parcels picked

    up, sorted or delivered, per route, per employee, per vehicle,

    per hour or per shift.

    To focus on customer service, we could measure each groups

    contribution to customers: proportion of the time the

    terminal met its deadlines, when terminals are required to

    sort shipments, what the sorting error rate was.

    We could also measure customer service by: no. of complaints

    operations group receives, average time taken by theoperation group to respond to complaints, and no. of

    complaints of poor, or impolite service.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    17/51

    Measuring inputs and outputs

    In the courier example, the inputs are causal

    and direct: e.g. no. of packets received to time

    taken to deliver them.

    But, such causal and direct relationships are

    not always possible. For example, how does

    advertising contribute to increase in

    revenues?

    Or, how would you measure the contribution

    of R & D to product innovation, revenue

    generation, or cost reduction?

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    18/51

    Types of Responsibility Centers

    Revenue Centers

    Cost Centers or Expense Centers

    Profit Centers and Investment Centers

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    19/51

    Revenue Centers

    Responsibility Centers whose members

    control revenues but,

    Not the manufacturing or acquisition cost of

    the products or services they sell, or

    In other words, you cannot link the input to

    the output.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    20/51

    Revenue Centers (continued)

    Most revenue centers may not set selling prices

    They definitely have no control over the costs ofinput acquired (service manager of an automobileworkshop does not control gasoline costs)

    These centers are generally not allocated costs of thegoods that they market (there are exceptions).Manager is responsible only for costs directlyincurred by his/her unit.

    They are evaluated on the basis of actual sales ororders booked against budgets or quotas and

    Example: a unit of a chain store in a mall.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    21/51

    Expense/Cost Centers

    Responsibility centers whose employees control costs, but do

    not control their revenues or investment level.

    Examples: Production department in a manufacturing unit, a

    dry cleaning business

    Two types of costs:

    Engineered: those costs that can be reasonably associated with a cost

    center direct labor, direct materials, telephone/electricity consumed,

    office supplies.

    Discretionary: where a direct relationship between a cost unit andexpenses cannot be reasonably made; Management allocates them

    on a discretionary basis (e.g. depreciation expenses for machines

    utilized).

    Diff b i d &

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    22/51

    Difference between engineered &

    discretionary expense center

    Engineered expense center

    The budget represents the

    unit cost of performing its

    task efficiently The cost are affected by

    short run volume changes

    Objective is to become cost

    competitive Measurement of

    performance is to send less

    for the same level of output

    Discretionary expense center

    Budget represents the

    amount required to do the

    particular level of job. Insulated from such short

    term fluctuations

    Financial control is

    exercised at the planningstage before the cost is

    incurred

    Measurement of

    performance is to obtain

    the desired output

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    23/51

    Expense centers (continued)

    Comparing Budgeted and Actual Costs

    Budgeted costs are target estimates.

    It points to a goal to be achieved.

    But, it is not written in concrete.

    Actual costs are that were incurred during a given period. The difference between the two could be either positive or

    negative variances.

    However, making conclusions on the basis of positive or

    negative variances must be done carefully.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    24/51

    Morton Carpets Budget (fixed)

    Prod. 1 Prod. 2 Prod. 3 Prod. 4 Total

    Units made 245,000 385,000 636,000 1,250,000

    Units per batch 500 2,500 1,500 5,000

    No. of batches 490 154 424 250

    Cost per unit $ 5.40 $3.20 $4.25 $1.45

    Cost per batch $325.00 $680.00 $400.00 $135.00

    Unit-related costs

    (245,000x$5.40)

    $1,323,000 $1,232,000 $2,703,000 $1,812,500 $7,070,500

    Batch-related costs

    (490x$325)

    159,250 104,720 169,600 33,750 467,320

    Prod.-sustaining costs 125,000 168,000 256,000 355,000 904,000

    Facility costs 1,450,000

    Total cost center costs $9,891,820

    C l

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    25/51

    Morton Carpets Actual costs

    Prod. 1 Prod. 2 Prod. 3 Prod. 4 Total

    Units made 295,200 345,000 675,000 950,000

    Units per batch 600 2,300 1,800 6,000

    No. of batches 492 150 375 159

    Cost per unit $5.43 $3.18 $4.33 $1.40

    Cost per batch $335.00 $670.00 $387 $144.00

    Unit-related costs $1,602,936 $1,097,100 $2,922,750 $1,330,000 $6,952,786

    Batch-related costs 164,820 100,500 145,125 22,896 $433,341

    Prod.-sustaining costs 133,000 163,000 259,000 362,000 $917,000

    Facility costs 1,650,000

    Total cost center costs $9,953,127

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    26/51

    Morton Carpets - Variance Analysis

    Budget Actual Variance

    Unit related costsProduct 1 $1,323,000 $1,602,936 ($279,936)

    Product 2 $1,232,000 $1,097,100 $134,900

    Product 3 $2,703,000 $2,922,750 ($219,750)

    Product 4 $1,812,500 $1,330,000 $482,500

    Total $7,070,500 $6,952,786 $117,714

    Batch related costsProduct 1 $159,250.00 164,820 ($5,570)

    Product 2 104,720 100,500 $4,220

    Product 3 169,600 145,125 $24,475

    Product 4 33,750 22,896 $10,854

    Total $467,320 $433,341 $33,979

    Prod. sus. Costs

    Product 1 125,000 133,000 ($8,000)

    Product 2 168,000 163,000 $5,000

    Product 3 256,000 259,000 ($3,000)

    Product 4 355,000 362,000 ($7,000)

    Total $904,000 $917,000 ($13,000)

    Fac. Sus. Costs 1,450,000 1,650,000 ($200,000)

    Total $9,891,820 $9,953,127 ($61,307)

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    27/51

    What do we learn from the variance analysis of

    Morton Carpets?

    The variance analysis presents a mix of

    positive and negative variances.

    Example: Product 1 and 3, unit-related costs

    were higher than planned, and

    For products 2 and 4 they were lower than

    planned.

    In total, the unit-related costs and batch-

    related costs were lower than planned and the

    product-sustaining and facility-sustaining costs

    were higher than planned.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    28/51

    What can we conclude about

    Morton Carpets?

    Based on initial analysis, manufacturing is able to controlunit-related and batch-related costs, but

    Did not do so well controlling product-sustaining and facility-sustaining costs.

    A closer examination, however, casts doubts on theseconclusions.

    If you look , you will notice that the no. of units actually madediffered from budgeted for all four products.

    Similarly, no. of units per batch actually produced differedfrom budgeted units per batch.

    Because of these volume differences, it is inappropriate tocompare the cost targets in the master budget with actualcost results.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    29/51

    What can managers do to make the numbers

    comparable and meaningful?

    Use a flexible budget

    Flexible budget recasts cost targets in the planned or

    budget to reflect the achieved level of production.

    The flexible budget develops cost target levels basedon actual level of activity.

    See the next set of slides.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    30/51

    Morton Carpets Flexible Master Budget

    Prod. 1 Prod. 2 Prod. 3 Prod. 4 Total

    Units made 295,000 345,000 675,000 950,000

    Units per batch 500 2,500 1,500 5,000

    No. of batches 590 138 450 190

    Cost per unit $5.40 $3.20 $4.25 $1.45

    Cost per batch $325.00 $680.00 $400.00 $135.00

    Unit-related costs $1,593,000 $1,104,000 $2,868,750 $1,377,500 $6,943,250

    Batch-related costs 191,750 93,840 180,000 25,650 $491,240

    Prod.-sustaining costs 125,000 168,000 256,000 355,000 904,000

    Facility costs 1,450,000

    Total cost center costs $9,788,490

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    31/51

    Flexible Budget Cost Analysis

    Budget

    Flexible

    budget Actual Variance Variance

    Unit related costs Budget - Flexible flexible budget - actual

    Product 1 $1,323,000 $1,593,000 $1,602,936 ($270,000) ($9,936)

    Product 2 $1,232,000 $1,104,000 $1,097,100 $128,000 $6,900

    Product 3 $2,703,000 $2,868,750 $2,922,750 ($165,750) ($54,000)

    Product 4 $1,812,500 $1,377,500 $1,330,000 $435,000 $47,500

    Total $7,070,500 $6,943,250 $6,952,786 $127,250 ($9,536)Batch related costs

    Product 1 $159,250.00 $191,750.00 164,820 ($32,500) $26,930

    Product 2 104,720 93,840 100,500 $10,880 ($6,660)

    Product 3 169,600 180,000 145,125 ($10,400) $34,875

    Product 4 33,750 25,650 22,896 $8,100 $2,754

    Total $467,320 $491,240 $433,341 ($23,920) $57,899

    Prod. sus. Costs

    Product 1 125,000 125,000 133,000 $0 ($8,000)Product 2 168,000 168,000 163,000 $0 $5,000

    Product 3 256,000 256,000 259,000 $0 ($3,000)

    Product 4 355,000 355,000 362,000 $0 ($7,000)

    Total $904,000 $904,000 $917,000 $0 ($13,000)

    Fac. Sus. Costs 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,650,000 $0 ($200,000)

    Total $9,891,820 $9,788,490 $9,953,127 $103,330 ($164,637)

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    32/51

    What did we infer from the

    flexible budget slides?

    Cost standards are the same as in the case of the fixed budget.Why?

    Difference: volume levels are adjusted to reflect achieved levelof activity (e.g. Product 2 was 345,000 and std. batch size of2,500 or 345/2.5 = 138 batches).

    Using std. unit cost of $3.20 and std. batch cost of $680, unit-related and batch-related costs for Prod. 2 should have been$1,104,000 (345,000 x $3.20) and $93,840 ($680 x 138).

    Planned variance reflect cost adjustment needed to show thedifferences in production volume between master budget and

    flexible budget. positive variance means a cost reduction due to lower volume

    and a negative variance means a cost increase because of ahigher volume.

    Flexible budget variances are the focus of cost control in a cost

    center.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    33/51

    Cost/Expense center variances

    A few pointers

    Dont rush to conclusions based on positive or

    negative variances.

    Find the cause behind the variances.

    Decompose the flexible budget variances for unit-related costs into price and quantity components.

    Since analysis of variances for batch-related,

    product-sustaining, and facility-sustaining costs is notformalized and proceeds on an ad hoc basis, Use

    your common sense and rationale as a neutral

    evaluator.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    34/51

    Profit Centers

    Managers of profit centers control both the

    revenues and costs of the product or service

    they deliver.

    It is like an independent business except it is

    part of a larger organization (e.g.

    departmental stores of larger chains Wal

    Mart, restaurants, corporate hotels such asHilton, Holiday Inn).

    The store manager would have responsibility

    for pricing, product selection, and promotion.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    35/51

    Profit Centers (continued)

    Cost for these units vary depending on ability

    to control labor, waste, and hours.

    Revenues also will vary depending on the

    units service level, location, etc.

    In other words, local discretion would affect

    revenues and costs.

    Therefore, profits represent a broader index of

    both corporate and local decisions.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    36/51

    Profit Centers (continued)

    If performance is poor, it may reflect poor

    conditions that no one in the organization

    could control as well as poor local conditions.

    For this reason, organizations should not

    evaluate performance only based on costs and

    profits, but

    Perform detailed evaluations that includequality, material use, labor use, and service

    measures that the local unit can control.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    37/51

    Investment Centers

    Responsibility centers whose managers and

    employees control revenues, costs, and the

    level of investment.

    It is also like an independent business

    (common when an organization acquires

    another organization e.g. Sears financial

    centers).

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    38/51

    Administrative Centers (support centers)

    One of the most difficult to evaluate because neither

    the input nor the output is easy to measure (e.g.

    accounting services, marketing), and

    Linking units input and output to organizationalobjectives.

    But, with a little careful approach, the costs of such

    centers can be reasonably computed.

    Since most of these centers are treated somewhatlike cost centers, an approach based on costs would

    be helpful.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    39/51

    Administrative Centers (support centers)

    Include senior corporate management and other managers

    that provide services to other responsibility centers

    The control of administrative expenses is difficult due to

    problems in measuring output and the frequent lack of goal

    congruence of the departments & the company.

    This problem arise with the size and prosperity of the firm.

    Budgets are prepared annually. It covers

    Basic cost of responsibility center

    Discretionary activities of responsibility centers

    Justification for proposed budgeted increase

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    40/51

    Research & development center

    The head of the R&D department wants to build the bestresearch organization.

    There is however a difficulty is relating results to inputs and

    there is lack of goal congruence

    In some companies basic research is included as a lumpsum inthe research program and its budget

    For projects involving product testing, it is possible to

    estimate the time and financial requirements.

    R&D is a discretionary expense and it is difficult to budget forthe same on a scientific basis. Most companies use a % of

    average revenue.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    41/51

    Marketing centers

    They perform marketing ( order getting) activities and logistics

    (order filling) activities.

    Marketing activities are those which are necessary for getting

    orders from the customers. They include advertising, publicity

    and test marketing.

    The logistic activity

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    42/51

    A simple summary of the

    responsibility centers

    Revenue CenterOutput measured in

    monetary terms

    Input measured inmonetary terms

    Output measured in

    monetary terms

    Output measured in

    monetary terms

    Expense/Cost Centers

    Profit Centers

    Investment Centers

    /

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    43/51

    Responsibility budgeting/

    responsibility accounting

    System of control by delegating & locating the

    responsibility for costs.

    There is identification of costs with the person

    responsible.

    This works best in a decentralized operation.

    this involves change in emphasis from

    product costing to responsibility costing.

    P i i f ibili

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    44/51

    Pre-requisites for responsibility

    costing The area of responsibility & authority should be clearly

    defined

    Each responsibility center should have a clear set of goals for

    the managers.

    The performance report should include revenues, exps etc.

    which are controllable by the managers.

    The manager should participate in establishing the goals of

    the organization

    Performance reports should be prepared highlighting the

    variances, the items that require managers attention.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    45/51

    Responsibility accounting

    Advantages

    Relieves top management

    from every day decision

    making

    Better training to the

    managers

    Limitations

    It results in loss of

    economies of scale

    Requires elaboratecommunication

    Leads to confusion in

    decision making.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    46/51

    What did we learn from these

    control system illustrations?

    All responsibility centers evolve from the concept of

    controllability.

    Controllability principle states a manager should be assigned

    responsibility for the revenue, costs, or investment that

    he/she could control.

    Revenues, costs, or investments that do not fall under a

    managers control must be excluded when evaluating the

    manager or his/her center.

    Problem with this concept: In most organizations, manyrevenues and costs are jointly earned or incurred and

    differentiation the controllable from the uncontrollable is

    difficult.

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    47/51

    An alternative to Controllability

    Some argue that performance measures

    should be chosen to influence decision-

    making behavior.

    For example, if market prices for raw material

    is increasing, what can a manager do?

    Perhaps, enter into long term contract for

    fixed prices for raw materials.

    If electricity consumption cost is going up, find

    out how consumption can be economized

    (better machines, lighting, reduce waste).

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    48/51

    Questions 2011

    Briefly describe responsibility center,

    engineered expense center, discretionary

    expense center, revenue center, profit center.

    How is the performance of the head of thesecenters evaluated

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    49/51

    Questions 2010

    What is responsibility center. List & explain

    different types of responsibility centers with

    sketches

    Briefly describe engineered expense centersand discretionary expense centers. How is the

    budget prepared in each and how is

    performance evaluated in each

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    50/51

    Questions 2009

    What is responsibility center. List & explain

    different types of responsibility centers with

    sketches

  • 7/28/2019 Management Control Systems_Session2

    51/51

    Questions 2008

    Explain responsibility center and map the

    process of evolution thereof from once stage

    to another with the help of illustrations cum

    experiences of the corporates.


Recommended