Management Letter
On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
Yusador S. Gaye, CPA, CGMA
Auditor General
Monrovia, Liberia
May, 2018
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
2 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Table of Contents
1 DETAILED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................... 6
1.1 Financial Matters ..................................................................................................... 6
1.1.1 Discrepancy between Final Trail balance and Financial Statements ........................... 6
1.1.2 Payment Vouchers not stamped “PAID” .................................................................. 7
1.1.3 Payment for Consultancy without Tax Deduction ..................................................... 8
1.1.4 NASSCORP Contribution ........................................................................................ 9
1.1.5 Presentation of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amounts.................................... 10
1.1.6 Uncommitted Cash Balance ................................................................................. 12
1.1.7 Comparative Information .................................................................................... 13
1.2 Administrative Issues ........................................................................................... 14
1.2.1 Payment Vouchers Not Pre-numbered .................................................................. 14
1.2.2 Lack of Audit Committee ..................................................................................... 15
1.2.3 Staff Attendance records ..................................................................................... 16
1.2.4 Training and Development Policy ......................................................................... 16
1.2.5 Unrecorded Fixed Asset Disposal ......................................................................... 17
1.2.6 No Evidence of Appointment Letter for Evaluation Panel ........................................ 19
1.2.7 Non-declaration of Conflict of Interest .................................................................. 20
1.2.8 Petty Cash Policy ................................................................................................ 20
1.3 INTERNAL CONTROLS ........................................................................................... 21
1.3.1 Risk Assessment ................................................................................................. 21
1.3.2 IT Strategic Committee ....................................................................................... 22
ANNEXURE ..................................................................................................................... 24
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
3 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Acronyms
Acronyms/Abbreviations Meaning
AG Auditor General
CBL Central Bank of Liberia
CGMA Chartered Global Management Accountant
CPA Certified Public Accountant
ED Executive Director
FAR Fixed Assets Register
GAAP Generally Accepted Accountant
GAC General Auditing Commission of Liberia
GC Governance Commission
GOL Government of Liberia
IA Internal Audit
IAA Internal Audit Agency
IAS Internal Audit Secretariat
ISSAI International Standards on Supreme Audit Institutions
OSIWA Open Society Initiative for West Africa
UNDP United Nations Development Program
UNESCO United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization
LDSP Liberia Decentralization Support Program
LHP Liberia History Project
LDLD Liberia Decentralization and Local Development
LEMTAIL Legislative Monitoring for Transparency and Accountability
LGA Local Governance Act
LRC Law Reform Commission
GT Guarantee Trust Bank
UBA United Bank for Africa
PFM Public Financial Management
LBDI Liberia Bank for Development and Investment
ARIC Audit Recommendation Implementation Committee
NSRP National Symbol Review Project
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
4 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
The Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements for the fiscal
Period 2013/2014 performed by the Auditor General
Hon. E. Othello Gongar
Acting Chairperson
Governance Commission
Monrovia, Liberia
May 31, 2018
Dear Hon. Gongar:
The Governance Commission (GC) financial statements are subject to audit by the Auditor-General
in terms of Section 2.1.3 of the New GAC Act of 2014 as well as in accordance with the Public
Financial Management Act and Regulations of 2009. The audit covered the fiscal year 2013/2014.
INTRODUCTION
The audit of the GC financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2014 was completed and the
purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention the findings that were revealed during the audit.
SCOPE AND DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY
The audit was conducted in accordance with the International Standards of Supreme Audit
Institutions (ISSAIs). These standards require that the audit is planned and performed so as to
obtain reasonable assurance that, in all material respects, fair presentation is achieved in the annual
financial statements.
An audit includes:
Examination on a test basis of evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements;
Assessment of the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management; and
Evaluation of the overall financial statement presentation.
The audit will also include an examination, on a test basis, of evidence supporting compliance in all
material respects with the relevant laws and regulations which came to our attention and are
applicable to financial matters.
The matters mentioned in this letter are therefore those that were identified through tests
considered necessary for the purpose of the audit and it is possible that there might be other
matters and/or weaknesses that were not identified.
The financial statements, maintenance of effective control measures and compliance with laws and
regulations are the responsibility of the Accounting Officer. Our responsibility is to express our
opinion on these financial statements.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
5 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Key Management Personnel
No. Name Position Tenure
1 Dr. Amos C. Sawyer Chairperson 2007 - Present
2 Madam Elizabeth Mulbah Vice Chairperson 2007 - Present
3 Dr. S. Jabaru Kallon Commissioner 2007 - Present
4 Mr. Yarsuo-weh Dorliae Commissioner 2007 - Present
6 Mr. Esther Richards-Freeman Executive Director 2007 - Present
7 Mr. Kollie Dorko Finance Manager 2013 - Present
APPRECIATION
We would like to express our appreciation for the courtesy and assistance rendered by the staff of
the GC during the audit.
Yours Faithfully,
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
6 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1 DETAILED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1.1 Financial Matters
1.1.1 Discrepancy between Final Trail balance and Financial Statements
Observation
1.1.1.1 Regulation A.3 (1) of the PFM Act of 2009 state that “Any public officer concerned with
the conduct of financial matters of the Government of Liberia, or the receipt, custody
and disbursement of public and trust moneys, or for the custody, care and use of
government stores and inventories shall keep books of accounts and proper records of
all transactions and shall produce the books of accounts and records of the transactions
for inspection when called upon to do so by the Auditor General, the Comptroller
General, the relevant internal auditor or any officers authorized by them, by the
Minister.”
1.1.1.2 During the audit, we observed from the final GC trial balances for two accounts bearing
the Codes (3211034 and 31NSRPL. NSRP) were US$3,983.22 and US$67,339.96
respectively, whereas the total amounts recorded in the financial statements for these
accounts were US$399.36 and US$63,962.50 thus resulting in unexplained net variance
of US$6,961.32. See table #2 for details:
Table #2: US Dollar variance for two accounts in the GC trial Balance
Risk
1.1.1.3 The financial statements could be misstated and the accuracy and completeness of the
financial statements would not be assured.
Recommendation
1.1.1.4 Management should provide justification for the variances noted in the final GC trial
balance and the financial statements for the fiscal under audit.
Management’s Response
1.1.1.5 Chapter 7 on Foreign Currency Translation of the Cash Basis IPSAS as adopted by the
Government of Liberia requires account balance at the end of the fiscal year (June 30,
2016) to be converted using the exchange rate issued by the Central Bank of Liberia. In
this particular case, the balances in the Adjusted Trial were converted by QuickBooks
using the average rate over the fiscal period. In adherence to the Cash Basis IPSAS as
adopted by the Government of Liberia, the balances were manually converted and
FY 2013/2014
Total per Final Trial
balance
US$
Total per
Financial Statement
US$
Variance
US$
AC Code:3211034 3,983.22 399.36 3,583.86
31NSRPL. NSRP 67,339.96 63,962.50 3,377.46
Total 6,961.32
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
7 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
placed in the Statement of Cash Position. This is included in the Financial Statement for
the fiscal period 2015/2016 on page 16, (ii), “Translation of transactions in foreign
currency” and page 25, “Appendix4”. Please find attached on page 25 as exhibit.
Table#2
Account Liberian Dollars Conversion rate USD Equivalent
31NSRPL 5,756,625 90 63,962.00
3211034GTB/AC L 35,942.36 90 399.36
Auditor General’s Position
1.1.1.6 The GC Management did not address the issue raised in our findings. We indicated that
there is a net variance between the GC trial balance and financial statements. We
therefore maintain our recommendation. However, Management is in breach of financial
discipline in line with Regulation A.20 of the PFM Act of 2009.
1.1.2 Payment Vouchers not stamped “PAID”
Observation
1.1.2.1 Regulation A-3 (1) of the PFM Act of 2009 states that “ any public officer concerned with
the conduct of financial matters of the Government of Liberia, or the receipt, custody
and disbursement of public and trust moneys, or for the custody, care and use of
government stores and inventories shall keep books of accounts and proper records of
all transactions and shall produce the books of accounts and records of the transactions
for inspection when called upon to do so by the Auditor General, the Comptroller General
, the relevant internal auditor or any officers authorized by them, by the Minister.(2) A
public officer who fails to keep or produce any records under this regulation is in a
breach of financial discipline as defined in Regulation A.20.’’
1.1.2.2 During the audit of the GC for the Fiscal Year 2013/14, it was observed that two paid
vouchers valued at US$3,152.50 were not stamped “PAID”. See table #3 for details
Table #3: Vouchers Not Stamped “PAID”
No Date Payee Voucher # Check# Amount US$
1 Aug. 14, 2013 Super Petroleum Co. 004 246619 1,700.00
2 Aug. 14, 2013 Super Petroleum 002 38863 1,457.50
Total 3,157.50
Risk
1.1.2.3 Failure to stamp payment voucher “PAID” could lead to the recycling of payments.
Recommendation
1.1.2.4 The GC Management should provide substantive justification and material evidence for
not stamping vouchers that have already been processed and paid.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
8 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.1.2.5 Management should ensure that all payment vouchers, once processed and paid, are
stamped “Paid” to avoid recycling.
Management’s Response
1.1.2.6 Management acknowledged that it was purely an oversight. This was not the case with
Fiscal Years 2014/2015 and 2015/16 that being audited by the GAC with Draft Audit
Reports already released.
Auditor General’s Position
1.1.2.7 We acknowledge the acceptance of our finding and recommendation. However,
Management is in breach of financial discipline in line with Regulation A.20 of the PFM
Act of 2009.
1.1.3 Payment for Consultancy without Tax Deduction
Observation
1.1.3.1 Section 905(e) of the Revenue Code of Liberia Act of 2000 as amended in 2011 states
that “a payer who makes a payment of wages or salaries to an employee in an amount
that during the tax year exceeds the standard deduction amount of Section 205(a) is
required to withhold tax from each payment in accordance with the income tax rates
specified in Section 200(a).” and (m) stipulates “a person who has a withholding
obligation under this section and fails to withhold and remit the amount of tax required
to be withheld is subject to section 52 penalty for late payment and failure to pay.”
1.1.3.2 During the conduct of the audit for the Fiscal Year 2013/14, it was observed that there
was no evidence that Management deducted income taxes totalling US400.00 from the
salaries of the Consultant hired for the National History Project (LHP). See table #6
below for details:
Table #6: Payments made to GC Consultants without Tax Deduction
Payee Position Voucher # Check # Amount US$
Withholding
Tax @ 10%
per GAC
calculation
Dr. Herbert Brewer Consultant 4,000.00 400.00
Total 4,000.00 400.00
Risk
1.1.3.3 The failure to deduct withholding taxes from the salary of service provider could deprive
the Government of much needed revenue.
Recommendation
1.1.3.4 The GC Management should provide substantive justification for failing to withhold taxes
in the amount of US$400.00.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
9 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.1.3.5 Going forward Management should ensure that income taxes are withheld from the
income of consultants and remitted into the GoL Consolidated Revenue Account.
Management’s Response
1.1.3.6 The Commission needed to start the rewriting of Liberia’s history under the Liberia
History Project. The Liberia History Project is the offspring of the Vision 2030 conference
held in Gbarnga, Bong County. Beginning the project was a challenge because of the
lack of funding. With the availability of limited funding, management decided to have the
consultant paid net of tax since the amount charged was beyond the Commission’s
reach.
Auditor General’s Position
1.1.3.7 Management assertion that “management decided to have the consultant paid net of tax
since the amount charged was beyond the Commission’s reach” is not materially
supported. No evidence of any article or section within the contract signed between the
GC Management and Dr Herbert Brewer that the contractor would be paid net of tax. We
therefore maintain our finding and recommendations. However, Management is in
breach of financial discipline in line with Regulation A.20 of the PFM Act of 2009.
1.1.4 NASSCORP Contribution
Observation
1.1.4.1 Chapter 89.16 (a, and h) of the Decree establishing the National Social Security &
Welfare Corporation (NASSCORP), requires that except as otherwise provided,
contributions and the method of payment shall be as follows:
1.1.4.2 The contribution payable under this Decree in respect of an employee shall comprise
contribution payable by the employer (herein after referred to as the employer’s
contribution) and contribution payable by the employee (herein after referred to as
employee’s contribution and shall be paid to the Corporation; (h) The contributions
payable in respect of each month shall ordinary fall due on the last day of the month
and where an employee is employed for part of the month or is employed under two or
more employers during the same month, the contributions shall fall due on such days as
may be specified in the Regulations.
1.1.4.3 Also, Section 89.18 of the Decree establishing NASSCORP says that “where a principal
employer defaults in paying any contribution prescribed by this Decree or subsequent
regulations, a sum equal to four (4%) of the amount unpaid shall be added for each
month or part of a month after the date on which payment was due, and any amount so
added shall be recoverable as a debt owed by the employer to the Republic”.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
10 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.1.4.4 During the conduct of the audit, we observed that Management paid salaries totalling
US$1,179,212.06 for the fiscal period 2013/2014 without deducting employee’s
contribution to NASSCORP. See Annexure 1 for details:
Risk
1.1.4.5 Failure by Management to deduct and remit Employees’ contribution could attract high
penalties for non-remittance and employees, and their families may not achieve benefits
when the employees retire from service.
Recommendation
1.1.4.6 Management should ensure that employees’ contributions are deducted and timely
remitted to NASSCORP so as to give protection to employees and their families in the
case of retirement.
Management’s Response
1.1.4.7 Management acknowledges the lack of employer’s contribution and employee’s
contribution to NASSCORP. Employer’s contribution has not been forthcoming from
MFDP. Going forward, management intends to engage with the authority of MFDP to
have past arrears and future contributions resolved.
Auditor General’s Position
1.1.4.8 We acknowledge the acceptance of our finding and recommendation. We will do a follow
up on the implementation of the recommendations in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission. However; management is in breach of Chapter 89.16 of the
Decree establishing the National Social Security & Welfare Corporation (NASSCORP).
1.1.5 Presentation of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amounts
Observation
1.1.5.1 Paragraph 5.2.0 of the IPSAS-Cash Basis of Accounting states that “subject to the
requirements of paragraph 5.3.0, an entity that makes publicly available its approved
budget(s) shall present a comparison of the budget amounts for which it is held publicly
accountable and actual amounts either as a separate additional financial statement or as
additional budget columns in the statement of cash receipts and payments currently
presented in accordance with this Standard. The comparison of budget and actual
amounts shall present separately for each level of legislative oversight: 12a) the original
and final budget amounts; 1b) the actual amounts on a comparable basis; and (1c) by
way of note disclosure, an explanation of material differences between the budget for
which the entity is held publicly accountable and actual amounts, unless such
explanation is included in other public documents issued in conjunction with the financial
statements, and a cross reference to those documents is made in the notes”.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
11 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.1.5.2 During the fiscal period under audit 2013/2014, we observed that Explanatory Notes
relating to the causes of significant variances between the budget and actual amounts
(i.e. revenues and expenditures) as required by the IPSAS Cash Basis Accounting were
not disclosed in the financial statements. We were thus unable to confirm or verify the
reasonableness of the variances as a result of the omitted disclosures.
Risk
1.1.5.3 Failure to disclose reasons for significant variances within the financial statements could
indicate the lack of proper budgetary control.
Recommendation
1.1.5.4 Management should ensure that notes to the financial statements include explanations
for significant variances between the budget and actual amounts to assist users better
understand the reason for material departures from the approved budget. Compliance
with this requirement would ensure that Management is accountable for its performance,
and is in compliance with the approved budget.
Management’s Response
1.1.5.5 Management did not include any explanatory note to the Statement of Budget and
Actuals because there was no material difference to report on as required by Paragraph
5.2.0 of the Cash Basis IPSAS Accounting adopted by the Government of Liberia.
Auditor General’s Position
1.1.5.6 Management did not address the issue raised by the GAC. In the Statements of Budget
versus Actual Amount, Management reported significant variances for the following
accounts as detailed in the table below:
No Description Actual
Amount US$
Final Budget
US$
Original
Budget US$
Difference
Final Budget
and Actual
US$
Percentage
variance
1. Capital
Expenditure 18,314.00 14,000.000 - 4,314.00 (31%)
2. Goods and
Services
Consumed 628,653.00 484,271.00 340,968.00 (144,382) (30%)
Net Effect (61%)
1.1.5.7 Financial statement items are material if they could influence the economic decisions of
users. The materiality concept is the universally accepted accounting principle that all
material matters are to be disclosed. Therefore, we maintain our recommendation.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
12 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.1.6 Uncommitted Cash Balance
Observation
1.1.6.1 Section 27 of the PFM Act of 2009 states that, “All un-allotted appropriations and all
uncommitted allotments will lapse at the end of the fiscal year. All balances of
appropriations committed but not disbursed prior to the end of the fiscal year, shall be
available for the settlement of those obligations within 90 days from the end of the
preceding fiscal year. All such balances not disbursed after ninety (90) days following the
end of the preceding fiscal year shall be moved to government Consolidated Account.
The recording, accounting and reporting of such undisbursed balances shall be set out in
accounting regulations to be issued under this Act and shall be consistent with the
provisions of sections 33, 34 and 35 of this Act”.
1.1.6.2 During the conduct of the audit, we observed that as at 30 June 2014, there was no
evidence that Management re-deposited into the GoL Consolidated Fund account the
total uncommitted cash balance of US$1,498.38.
Risk
1.1.6.3 The failure to re-deposit uncommitted fund into the consolidated Fund is in violation of
the PFM Act of 2009 and understates the reallocation of public resources.
Recommendation
1.1.6.4 Management should provide substantive justification for not depositing into the
Consolidated Fund Account the unexpended cash balances totaling US$1,498.38.
1.1.6.5 Going forward, at the end of each fiscal period, Management should ensure that all
unobligated cash balances are re-deposited into the GOL Consolidated fund account for
reallocation by the National Legislature.
Management’s Response
1.1.6.6 The US$1,498.38 amount reported in the observation was committed in Fiscal Year
2013/2014 and paid in Fiscal Year 2014/2015. The documents are available for
verification.
Auditor General’s Position
1.1.6.7 During the course of the audit, Management did not provide any commitment schedule
to cover the uncommitted cash balance of US$1,498.38 reported. Moreover,
Management did provide the document which it said is available. Therefore, we maintain
our recommendation. Further, Management is in breach of financial discipline in line with
Regulation A.20 of the PFM Act of 2009.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
13 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.1.7 Comparative Information
Observation
1.1.7.1 Paragraph 2.6.0 of the IPSAS cash Basis of accounting as adopted by the Government of
Liberia requires that unless a provision of this Standard permits or requires otherwise,
comparative information should be disclosed in respect of the previous period for all
numerical information required by this Standard. Comparative information should be
included in narrative and descriptive information when it is relevant to an understanding
of the current period’s financial statements.
1.1.7.2 During the Fiscal period 2013/2014, we observed that the financial statement was not
comparable to previous period as required by the above IPSAS provision.
Risk
1.1.7.3 In the absence of comparable information, users would not be to identify similarities and
differences of information provided in the financial statements and past reports.
Recommendation
1.1.7.4 Management should provide justification for not preparing the financial statements on
comparable basis.
1.1.7.5 Going forward, Management should ensure that the financial statements are prepared
on a comparable basis so as to help users to understand the similarities and differences
of information provided.
Management’s Response
1.1.7.6 For the Fiscal Year 2013/2014, the reporting template received from the erstwhile
Ministry of Finance did not include columns for comparative information. Submission of
financial statement was based on the straight usage of the reporting template received.
Find attached the reporting template.
Auditor General’s Position
1.1.7.7 Management did not provide any evidence that reporting template provided by the
erstwhile Ministry of Finance excluded the inclusion of comparative information in the
financial statements.
1.1.7.8 Furthermore, IPSAS cash Basis of accounting as adopted by the Government of Liberia
requires financial statements to be comparable because it provides users with relevant
information on the entity’s performance over multiple periods thereby enabling them to
make economic and financial decisions. Therefore, we maintain our recommendation.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
14 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.2 Administrative Issues
1.2.1 Payment Vouchers Not Pre-numbered
Observation
1.2.1.1 Regulation P.9.1 of the PFM Act of 2009 requires that all disbursements or payments of
public moneys shall be properly supported by pre-numbered payment vouchers.
1.2.1.2 It was observed during the audit that several payments vouchers for goods and services
were not pre-numbered. Below are samples of payment vouchers that were not pre-
numbered. See table #7 for details:
Table #7: Fifteen (15) Payment Vouchers Not Pre-numbered
No Date Payee Check
#
Voucher
#
Amount
US$
1 Aug. 14, 2013 Super Petroleum Co. 246619 004 1,700.00
2 Aug. 14, 2013 Super Petroleum Co. 38863 002 1,457.50
3 Aug. 27, 2013 HIGH TEC 38868 007 1,750.00
4 Aug. 27, 2013 Liberia Observer Corp. 38869 008 1,200.00
5 Sept. 5, 2013 Lone Star Comm. Corp. 45454 017 1,170.00
6 Sept. 5, 2013 Global Stationery & Computer Center 45455 018 430.00
7 Sept. 12, 2013 Auto LINK 45459 022 1,300.00
8 Oct. 29, 2013 Office Ideals 45487 047 1,416.50
9 Nov. 6, 2013 Liberia Observer Corp. 45991 50 2,475.00
10 Dec. 12, 2013 Super Petroleum Co. 332656 049 218.00
11 Dec. 19, 2013 Super Petroleum Co. 51001 060 9,976.60
12 Dec. 23, 2013 Samuel K. Johnson 332659 052 200.00
13 Jan. 17, 2014 Aaron Weah 332673 065 731.85
14 Feb. 25, 2014 Abou Hacheam Store 355809 096 377.50
15 April 21, 2013 Super Petroleum Co. 355843 130 218.00
Total 244,620.95
Risk
1.2.1.3 Payment vouchers not pre-numbered could lead to duplication of payments and
recycling of invoices.
Recommendation
1.2.1.4 Management should ensure that all its payment vouchers are pre-numbered and type
written to enable management to track payments and avoid possible duplication of
payments.
Management’s Response
1.2.1.5 This was corrected in the Fiscal Periods 2014/15 and pre-numbered vouchers are
currently being used. This evidenced by the fact that there was no such observation
raised in the Draft Management Letters for FY 2014/2015 and FY 2015/2016. Find
attached pre-numbered voucher for fiscal year 2014/2015.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
15 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.1.6 We acknowledge Management acceptance of our finding and recommendation. We shall
do a follow up on the implementation of the recommendations in subsequent audit of
the Governance Commission. However, management is in breach of financial discipline in
line with Regulation A.20 of the PFM Act of 2009.
1.2.2 Lack of Audit Committee
Observation
1.2.2.1 Regulation K.10 of the PFM Act of 2009 states that “a head of government agency or
government organization shall in consultation with the internal audit governance board
establish and maintain an audit committee for the government agency or organization
for which he/she is responsible”.
1.2.2.2 In addition, Regulation K.11(1a) of the PFM Act of 2009 requires that the Audit
Committee of Government Agencies or Organizations shall review internal controls,
including the scope of internal audit, internal audit Plans, internal audit findings, and
recommend to the head of government agency the appropriate action to be taken.
1.2.2.3 During the period under audit, there was no evidence to indicate that the Management
of GC established functioning audit Committee.
Risk
1.2.2.4 The failure of Management to establish functioning Audit Committee may prevent
Management from taking timely corrective action on deficiencies identify in internal
controls.
Recommendation
1.2.2.5 Management should establish a functioning Audit Committee as part of the Governance
structures. This will enable Management to evaluate and ensure that internal controls
are operating effectively.
Management’s Response
1.2.2.6 Management acknowledges and will take measure to have the Audit Committee
constituted.
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.2.7 We acknowledge the acceptance of our finding and recommendation. We shall do a
follow up on the implementation of the recommendations in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission. However, management is in breach of financial discipline in
line with Regulation A.20 of the PFM Act of 2009.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
16 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.2.3 Staff Attendance records
Observation
1.2.3.1 Section 5.1.1 of the Civil Service Standing Order requires that Civil Servants are normally
required to work 5 days per week. Normal working hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. subject to the approval of supervisors. A period of one hour is allowed for lunch. No
employee is permitted to leave his place of work without the knowledge of his
supervisor.
1.2.3.2 Section 12.1 of the GC Human Resource (HR) Hand Book states “The workday normally
begins at 9:00 a.m. and ends at 5:00 p.m., with a one-hour lunch, Monday through
Friday. Management may grant flexibility in these hours, recognizing transportation and
other personal issues. The general rule is that employees are expected to work a
minimum of forty (40) hours per week”.
1.2.3.3 During the conduct of the audit, we observed from samples selected from the GC Staff
Attendance Log that several employees did not sign out from work to indicate that the
staff worked from 8:00AM to 5:00 PM on working days.
1.2.3.4 In addition, we further observed that several members of staff signed off before 5:00 PM
daily.
Risk
1.2.3.5 The failure by employees to sign out could lead to staffs leaving jobs ahead of time.
Recommendation
1.2.3.6 Management should ensure that the Commission’s staffs sign in and out from work at
the appropriate hours specified in the GC Human Resource (HR) Hand Book.
Management’s Response
1.2.3.7 Management acknowledges and will implement as per the recommendation.
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.3.8 We acknowledge the acceptance of our finding and recommendation. We shall do a
follow up on the implementation of the recommendation in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission. However, Management is in breach of Section 5.1.1 of the Civil
Service Standing Order
1.2.4 Training and Development Policy
Observation
1.2.4.1 Section 4 (a & b, ii) of the CSA Human Resource Manual states that “Agencies are
required to prepare individual Employee Development plans for employees as part of the
Employee Work Profile. The plan must include personal learning goals, learning steps
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
17 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
and resource needs; establishing a procedure for approving employee training requests
when: the training is work-related; and the agency will benefit from the employee’s
training.’’
1.2.4.2 Furthermore, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) requires that commitment to competence includes the level of knowledge and
skill needed to help ensure orderly, ethical, economical, efficient and effective
performance, as well as a good understanding of individual responsibilities with respect
to internal control.
1.2.4.3 The above can be evidenced by providing training, to raise the awareness of
management and employees of the internal control objectives and, in particular, the
objective of ethical operations, and helps them to understand the internal control
objectives and to develop skills to handle ethical dilemmas.
1.2.4.4 During the audit of the GC for the Fiscal Year 2013/14, it was observed that there was
no evidence that Management had in place criteria for the recruitment of individual
beneficiaries for training and Career Development.
Risk
1.2.4.5 Lack of criteria on training and development may result in training programs not being
able to address employees’ training needs and performance deficiencies.
Recommendation
1.2.4.6 Management should revise the Commission Handbook so as to include detailed criteria
on employees’ training and development needs. This will enhance the performance of
employees in meeting the objectives of the GC.
Management’s Response
1.2.4.7 Management acknowledges and will implement as per the recommendation.
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.4.8 We acknowledge the acceptance of our finding and recommendation. However, we shall
do a follow up on the implementation of the recommendation in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission. However, Management is in breach of Section 4 (a & b, ii) of
the CSA Human Resource Manual.
1.2.5 Unrecorded Fixed Asset Disposal
Observation
1.2.5.1 Regulation V.5 (1) of the PFM Act of 2009 requires that the conditions and terms of
disposal or sale of immovable or movable assets shall be determined by the General
Services Agency.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
18 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.2.5.2 Furthermore, Page 17, Paragraph 5 of the GC’s Financial Management Policies and
Procedures Manual states that “GC does maintain an asset registry and various inventory
registries to comply with the requirement to control all valuable assets and provide
information to the GSA to compile a central asset registry.”
1.2.5.3 During the audit, it was observed that several assets such as office equipment, furniture
and fixtures were reported damaged and disposed of by Management. However, there
was no evidence that the disposal was done with the participation of the GSA as
required by the above PFM regulations See table #9 for details
Table #9: Assets Disposal without GSA participation
No Description Serial# Code Comment
1 Dell Desktop 4N22K52 GSA-GC-297-33 Damaged Desktop computer
(Executive Assistant to Chair
Office)
2 UPS 350JPS14 GSA-GC-297-7 Damaged
3 HP Printer CNKJR17872 GSA-GC-297-6 Damaged
4 Executive Chair - GSA-GC-420-15 Damaged
5 Executive Chair - GSA-GC-420-11 Damaged
6 Plastic - GSA-GC-420-1-4 Damaged
7 Office Desk - GSA-GC-420-56 Damaged
8 Executive Chair - GSA-GC-420-61 Damaged
9 Visitor Chair (3PCS) - GSA-GC-420-6-8 Damaged
10 FAN - GSA-GC-420-1 Damaged
11 Desktop (monitor) CNOD3NFO6 GSA-GC-297-17 Damaged
12 Plastic 2pcs - GSA-GC-420-1-3 Damaged
13 A/C - GSA-GC-031-23 Damaged
14 Book Shelf(wood) - GSA-GC-420-3 Damaged
Risk
1.2.5.4 Disposal of fixed assets without the GSA participation could be a violation of the PFM Act
and Regulation.
Recommendation
1.2.5.5 Management should provide substantive justification and material evidence for disposing
of the fixed assets without the participation of the GSA.
1.2.5.6 Management should ensure that fixed assets disposals are done with the full
participation of the GSA.
Management’s Response
1.2.5.7 Management acknowledges and will implement as per the recommendation.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
19 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.5.8 We acknowledge the acceptance of our finding and recommendations. We shall do a
follow up on the implementation of the recommendations in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission. However, Management is in breach of financial discipline in
line with Regulation A.20 of the PFM Act of 2009.
1.2.6 No Evidence of Appointment Letter for Evaluation Panel
Observation
1.2.6.1 Regulation 11 (a-b) of the PPC Act as Amended and Restated in 2010 requires that in
the establishment of a Bid Evaluation Panel by the Procurement Committee under
section 30 of the Act, the Procurement Committee shall ensure that: (a) Persons who
are qualified and required to serve on a Panel for the evaluation of bids are invited
formally by a letter of invitation to serve on the Bid Evaluation Panel for the specific
purpose. (b) A person who accepts to serve on the Bid Evaluation Panel shall give a
written undertaking indicating that no conflict of interest exists or would arise in the
performance of his/her responsibilities as a member of the Panel.
1.2.6.2 During the audit of the GC for the Fiscal Year 2013/14, it was observed that there was
no evidence of appointment letters for members of the Bid Evaluation.
1.2.6.3 Furthermore, we observed that there was no evidence of written undertaking from
members of the Bid Evaluation Panel to indicate that no conflict of interest exists in
performing their respective duties.
Risk
1.2.6.4 In the absence of appointment letter, the Term of reference (TOR) for members of the
Bid Evaluation panel may not be known.
1.2.6.5 Also, in the absence of written undertaking, Members of the bid evaluation panel could
be venerable to conflict of interest.
Recommendation
1.2.6.6 The Procurement Committee of the GC should ensure that each member of the Bid
Evaluation Panel is invited by a letter of invitation to serve on the Panel with appropriate
term of reference (TOR).
Management’s Response
1.2.6.7 Management acknowledges that there was no formal letter written for the period under
audit. However, appointment letters were written in subsequent fiscal years. Find
attached copies of the Appointment Letter for Evaluation Panel.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
20 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.6.8 We acknowledge the acceptance of our findings and recommendation. We shall do a
follow up on the implementation of the recommendation in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission. However, Management is in breach of Regulation 11 (a-b) of
the PPC Act as Amended and Restated in 2010.
1.2.7 Non-declaration of Conflict of Interest
Observation
1.2.7.1 Regulation 11 (b) of the PPC Act as Amended and Restated in 2010 states that “a
person who accepts to serve on the Bid Evaluation Panel shall give a written undertaking
indicating that no conflict of interest exists or would arise in the performance of his/her
responsibilities as a member of the Panel.”
1.2.7.2 During the audit, it was observed that there was no evidence that members of the
Evaluation Panel gave a written undertaking to indicate that no conflict of interest exists
in performing their duties.
Risk
1.2.7.3 In the absence of a written undertaking, Bid Evaluation Panel members may be
susceptible to conflict of interest.
Recommendation
1.2.7.4 Management should ensure that individuals appointed to the bid evaluation panel
provide a written undertaking to protect the Commission against conflict of interest.
Management’s Response
1.2.7.5 Management acknowledges and will implement as per the recommendation.
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.7.6 We acknowledge the acceptance of our finding and recommendation. We shall do a
follow up on the implementation of the recommendations in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission. However, Management is in breach of Regulation 11 (b) of the
PPC Act as Amended and Restated in 2010.
1.2.8 Petty Cash Policy
Observation
1.2.8.1 Regulation B.33 (4) of the PFM Act requires that in terms of this regulation, the
maximum amount that may be held as petty cash in any one calendar month is the
equivalent of United Sates Dollars Two Hundred.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
21 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
1.2.8.2 During the audit we observed on Paragraph 1, Page 23, of GC’s Financial Procedure
Manual that Management established a petty cash ceiling amount of US$300.00 instead
of US$200.00 as required by the above PFM Regulation.
Risk
1.2.8.3 The establishment of a petty cash ceiling above the Government approved ceiling
amount could lead to the abuse of the fund.
Recommendation
1.2.8.4 Management should establish an approved petty cash ceiling limit in line with
Government’s fiscal policies.
Management’s Response
1.2.8.5 Petty Cash Policy has been revised to reflect the Regulation B.33 (4) of the PFM Act.
Current petty cash ceiling is now US$200.00. Find attached petty cash vouchers.
Auditor General’s Position
1.2.8.6 The petty cash policy was not revised during the period under audit. Moreover,
Management did not provide any copy of the revised petty cash policy for audit
validation. Therefore, Management is in breach of financial discipline in line with
Regulation A.20 of the PFM Act of 2009.
1.3 Internal Controls
1.3.1 Risk Assessment
Observation
1.3.1.1 According to the Internal Control Integrated Framework of COSO, the board or heads of
public entity is ultimately responsible for determining whether management has
implemented effective internal control including monitoring. The organization makes this
assessment by (a) Understanding the risks the organization faces and (b) Gaining an
understanding of how senior management manages or mitigates those risks that are
meaningful to the organizations’ objectives”. Obtaining this understanding includes
determining how management supports its beliefs about the effectiveness of the internal
control system in those important areas.
1.3.1.2 During the audit, we observed that there was no evidence to indicate that Management
conducted risk assessment for the fiscal period 2013/2014 which would enable
Management to understand the extent of risks it faced in achieving the Commission’s
objectives.
1.3.1.3 Furthermore, there was no evidence that the GC Management has a risk management
policy to mitigate internal and external risks that could severally impact the achievement
of the institution’s objectives.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
22 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Risk
1.3.1.4 Management’s failure to carry out risks assessment during the fiscal period 2013/2014
could lead to Management not being aware of the risk the Commission faced.
Recommendation
1.3.1.5 The Management of the GC should ensure that risk assessment is conducted on a
periodic basis so as to enable Management identifies risks that the institution is faced
with and design strategy to mitigate the identified risks.
Management’s Response
1.3.1.6 Management acknowledges and will implement as per the recommendation.
Auditor General’s Position
1.3.1.7 We acknowledge the acceptance of our findings and recommendation. We shall do a
follow up on the implementation of the recommendation in subsequent audit of the
Governance Commission.
1.3.2 IT Strategic Committee
Observation
1.3.2.1 For Planning and Organization, COBIT 4.1 PO4.2 explains the need to establish an IT
strategy committee at the board level. This committee should ensure that IT
governance, as part of enterprise governance, is adequately addressed; advise on
strategic direction; and review major investments on behalf of the full board.
1.3.2.2 During the audit we observed that Management used QuickBooks Application to process
the Commission’s accounting information. We further observed that there was no
evidence that Management established an IT Strategy Committee to provide strategic
direction in order help regulate and govern IT activities at the Commission during the
fiscal period under audit.
Risk
1.3.2.3 The absence of an IT Strategic Committee could lead to poor or non-proper
management of IT activities at the Commission.
Recommendation
1.3.2.4 The GC Management should ensure that IT Strategic Committee is established to help
with the governing and management of its IT activities.
Management’s Response
1.3.2.5 Currently, the Commission has a team called the Project Accountability Team
representing head of departments, program managers, and policy analysts. The team
played the role of the IT steering Committee in addition to other functions it executes.
The Commission notwithstanding acknowledges the recommendation and will work to
have it implemented.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
23 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
Auditor General’s Position
1.3.2.6 Management did not provide any evidence that the Project Accountability Team was
functioning during the Fiscal Period under audit. Moreover, the term of reference for the
Project Accountability Team was not provided by Management to determine whether the
Team played the role of the IT steering Committee. However, we acknowledge the
acceptance of our recommendation. We shall do a follow up on the implementation of
the recommendation in subsequent audit of the Governance Commission.
Management Letter On the Audit of the Governance Commission Financial Statements For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014
24 Promoting Accountability of Public Resources www.gac.gov.lr
ANNEXURE
Annexure 1: Remunerations paid to GC Staff without deducting Social Security Contributions for
FY 2013/14
Month Payroll Gross NASSCORP
Deduction @ 3%
NASSCORP
Employees
Contributions
@ 4%
Totals
Jul-13 Special & Gen. Allow. 60,945.00 1,828.35 2,437.80 4,266.15
Professional Allowance 41,688.88 1,250.67 1,667.56 2,918.22
Aug-13 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Gen. Allow. &
Professionals 64,950.54 1,948.52 2,598.02 4,546.54
Sep-13 Special & Gen. Allow. 54,595.00 1,637.85 2,183.80 3,821.65
Professional Allowance 37,577.76 1,127.33 1,503.11 2,630.44
Oct-13 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Gen. Prof. Allow. 65,711.65 1,971.35 2,628.47 4,599.82
Nov-13 Special Allowance 41,000.00 1,230.00 1,640.00 2,870.00
Prof. & Gen. Allow. 67,586.65 2,027.60 2,703.47 4,731.07
Dec-13 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Gen. Allow. 26,120.00 783.60 1,044.80 1,828.40
Professional Allowance 41,466.65 1,244.00 1,658.67 2,902.67
Jan-14 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Prof. & Gen. Allow. 63,697.76 1,910.93 2,547.91 4,458.84
Feb-14 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Prof. & Gen. Allow. 63,697.76 1,910.93 2,547.91 4,458.84
Mar-14 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Prof. & Gen. Allow. 67,786.66 2,033.60 2,711.47 4,745.07
Apr-14 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Gen. Allow. 32,920.00 987.60 1,316.80 2,304.40
Professional Allowance 39,577.77 1,187.33 1,583.11 2,770.44
May-14 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Prof. & Gen. Allow. 69,944.99 2,098.35 2,797.80 4,896.15
Jun-14 Special Allowance 30,000.00 900.00 1,200.00 2,100.00
Prof. & Gen. Allow. 69,944.99 2,098.35 2,797.80 4,896.15
Totals 1,179,212.06 35,376.36 47,168.48 82,544.84