Date post: | 04-Aug-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mohammad-redowan |
View: | 786 times |
Download: | 2 times |
PROJECT PAPER
ON
MMaannaaggeemmeenntt ooff SShhaaddee ttrreeeess iinn tthhee tteeaa
ggaarrddeennss ooff BBaannggllaaddeesshh wwiitthh ssppeecciiaall rreeffeerreennccee
ttoo tthhee RRaassiiddppuurr aanndd KKaammaaiicchhoorraa TTeeaa EEssttaattee
IINNSSTTIITTUUTTEE OOFF FFOORREESSTTRRYY AANNDD EENNVVIIRROONNMMEENNTTAALL SSCCIIEENNCCEESS
UUNNIIVVEERRSSIITTYY OOFF CCHHIITTTTAAGGOONNGG
CCHHIITTTTAAGGOONNGG,, BBAANNGGLLAADDEESSHH
SSEEPPTTEEMMBBEERR 22000033
PROJECT PAPER
COURSE NO-424
MANAGEMENT OF SHADE TREES IN THE TEA GARDENS OF
BANGLADESH WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE
RASIDPUR AND KAMAICHORA TEA ESTATE
A dissertation presented as a requirement for the degree of 4-year professional Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Forestry,
Institute of Forestry & Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong Chittagong, Bangladesh
Supervised By
Dr. Mohammed Shafiul Alam
Associate Professor
Institute of Forestry and
Environmental Sciences
University of Chittagong
Submitted by
Mohammad Redowan
Exam Roll No: 97/22
Reg. No: 138
Session: 1996-97
Institute of Forestry and
Environmental Sciences
University of Chittagong
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the author Mohommad Redowan bearing Exam Roll. 97/22, Reg. No.
138, Session: 1996-97 has prepared this Project Paper “Management of Shade trees in the tea gardens
of Bangladesh with special reference to the Rasidpur and Kamaichora Tea Estate” under my guidance
and supervision. I do hereby approve the style and content of this Project paper. This is for the partial
fulfillment of 4-year Professional Bachelor of Science (Hons) in Forestry degree of the Institute of
Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Dr. Mahammed Shafiul Alam
Associate Professor
Institute of Forestry and
Environmental Sciences
University of Chittagong
Chittagong, Bangladesh.
DECLARATION
I would like to take the opportunity to declare that this Project Paper has been compiled
by me to submit it to the Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences for the partial
fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of B. Sc. (Hon’s.) in Forestry. This Project
Paper has not been submitted in any application in the past for the fulfillment of any degree.
The literature review and field works mentioned in this paper were absolutely executed by me
unless otherwise stated.
Mohammad Redowan
September, 2003
DEDICATED TO
MY LATE FATHER
MR. MOHAMMAD SIRAJUL ISLAM
WHO LEFT US VERY EARLY
AT THE AGE OF 52
IN MAY 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... I
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. III
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................. IV
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ V
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
2. OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 4
3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 5
4. General description of rasidpur and kamaichora tea estate ................................................ 6
4.1. Location and area ......................................................................................................... 6
4.2. Tea Climate ................................................................................................................. 6
4.3. Tea soil ......................................................................................................................... 6
4.3.1. Ideal condition for tea soil .................................................................................... 6
4.4. Soil and topographic condition .................................................................................... 7
4.4.1. Soil texture ............................................................................................................ 7
4.4.2. Soil structure ......................................................................................................... 7
4.5. Topographic condition of Rasidpur and Kamaichora tea estates ................................ 7
5. SHADE TREE .................................................................................................................... 8
5.1. Types of shade trees ..................................................................................................... 8
5.1.1. Permanent shade trees: ......................................................................................... 9
5.1.2. Temporary shade trees .......................................................................................... 9
6. SOIL AND CLIMATIC REQUIREMENTS OF SOME SHADE TREE SPECIES ....... 10
6.1. Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth .................................................................. 10
6.2. Acacia mangium Willd .............................................................................................. 10
6.3. Albizia falcataria (L.) Fosberg ................................................................................... 11
6.4. Albizia lebbek (L.) Benth. ......................................................................................... 12
6.5. Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. .......................................................................................... 12
6.6. Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. .............................................................................................. 13
6.7. Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud. ................................................................................. 13
6.8. Leucaena leucocephala .............................................................................................. 14
6.9. Matching Species with Site ........................................................................................ 15
7. Growth performance of shade trees .................................................................................. 15
8. Silviculture of shade trees ................................................................................................. 17
8.1. Mixture of shade tree species ..................................................................................... 19
II
8.2. Spacing of shade tree ................................................................................................. 20
8.3. Lay Out Of Tea / Shade / Green Crop ....................................................................... 21
8.4. Planting of shade trees ............................................................................................... 23
9. Propagation of shade trees ................................................................................................ 24
10. Establishment of shade .................................................................................................. 25
11. Effect of shade per se .................................................................................................... 26
12. Shade trees and litterfall ................................................................................................ 26
13. Shade and light intensity ................................................................................................ 28
14. Shade and tea leaf temperature ...................................................................................... 28
15. Effect of shade trees on light climate ............................................................................ 29
16. Shade and partition of growth ....................................................................................... 30
17. Shade effect on quality of made tea ............................................................................... 31
18. Current perspective ........................................................................................................ 31
19. Management of Shade Trees ......................................................................................... 33
19.1. Lopping and Uprooting of Shade Trees ................................................................. 34
19.2. Uprooting................................................................................................................ 36
20. The Bad Effects of Shade .............................................................................................. 36
20.1. Competition between shade trees and tea bushes .................................................. 37
21. Role of shade trees in reducing wind damage ............................................................... 37
21.1. Planting materials and wind damage ...................................................................... 38
21.2. Shade trees as shelterbelt ........................................................................................ 39
22. Importance of shade trees at a glance ............................................................................ 41
23. Uses of Shade trees ........................................................................................................ 41
24. A grief description of two important shade trees used in Bangladesh tea estates ......... 44
24.1. Gliricidia Sepium As A Shade Tree ....................................................................... 44
25. Leucaenas as shade trees ............................................................................................... 46
25.1. Some information about Ipil-ipil (Leucaena leucocephala), a common leucaena,
which is used as shade tree in the tea estate is given here; ................................................... 48
26. Influence of Shade on the Incidence of Pests in Tea Plantation in Bangladesh ............ 49
27. Diseases of Shade Trees ................................................................................................ 50
27.1. Leaf diseases .......................................................................................................... 50
27.2. Stem diseases .......................................................................................................... 53
27.3. Root diseases .......................................................................................................... 57
28. Catalogue of Pests on Shade Trees and Ancillary Crops .............................................. 61
29. Problems of shade tree management in Bangladesh ..................................................... 67
30. RECOMMENDATION ................................................................................................. 69
31. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 71
REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 72
III
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Bangladesh tea research institute test the soil sample of Rasidpur tea estate and give
the following information. ............................................................................................... 8
Table 2 Showing the growth performance of A. chinensis and A. odoratissimaxin in
Kamaichora and Rasidpur tea estates respectively ........................................................ 16
Table 3 Spacing of shade trees used in the Rasidpur and Kamaichora tea estates depending on
location (in m.) ............................................................................................................... 21
Table 4. Pests of shade trees and ancillary crops................................................................... 61
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: High and low shade of Grevillea and Dodaps in tea plantation ................................ 25
Figure 2: Mixture of various shade trees (Ipil-ipil, Shada koroi, Chakua koroi) used at
Rasidpur Tea Estate .......................................................................................................... 33
Figure 3: Wind damaged tea bush ............................................................................................ 39
Figure 5: Packaging of tea in the tea chests is going on .......................................................... 43
Figure 6: Gliricidia sepium which is used as temporary shade tree in the tea plantation ........ 44
Figure 7: Acacia auriculiformis used as shade tree at Rasidpur Tea Estate ............................. 69
IV
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I express my deepest sense of gratitude and indebt ness to my respected teacher and
supervisor of this project paper, Dr. MOHAMMED SHAFIUL ALAM, Associated Professor,
Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, for his perfect
supervision, proper guidance, constructive criticism, inspiration, and affection during the
preparation of this project paper. Without his kind supervision and encouragement I could not
come up with this project paper. I am grateful to Mrs. Jarin Akhter, Lecturer, Institute of Forestry
and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, for providing the book ‘Tea Environments
and Yield in Sri Lanka.’
I am deeply indebted to Mr. Md. Shahiduzzaman, Chief, Scientific Oficer, Crop
Production Department, Dr. Md. Mainuddin, Chief Scientific Officer, Entomology Division, Dr.
Quamrul Ahsan, Chief Scientific Officer, Soil Chemistry Department, Mr. Mohammad Ali,
Senior Scientific Officer, Plant Pathology Division all at Bangladesh Tea Research Institute
(BTRI) for supplying valuable books and written documents without which writing of this paper
could not have been possible.
I am grateful to Mr. Joynul Abedin, Assistant Manager, Kamaichora Tea Estate,
Habiganj and Mr. Hassan Tariq, Assistant Manager, Rasidpur tea estate, Habiganj who provided
necessary information related to this Project Paper. I thank Mr. Safiq Ahmed Chowdhury, Chief
Executive, Finlay House, Srimongal for permitting me to collect field data from Kamaichora and
Rasidpur Tea Estate.
I deeply acknowledge the co-operation of Sanjoy Kumar Deb, Shah Fakhruddin, Shariful
Islam for their cordial help in processing the field data and collection of necessary data form the
field. Special thanks to Syed and his younger sister Munny for their cordial help in computer
processing and typing the whole project Paper. I can never forget those who in various ways
helped in collection of data and prepare the Project Paper.
V
ABSTRACT
A concise review of different important aspects of shade tree management has been
presented in this Paper. Special reference has been made with Rasidpur and Kamaichora Tea
Estates at Habiganj District. Major study areas covered are climatic and edaphic requirements of
different Shade Trees, optimum growing condition, major types of shade trees used in
Bangladesh, evaluation of growth performance in the field, silvicultural details, uses of shade
trees when harvested etc. Shade trees not only provide shade t the tea crop in addition they
provide numerous other benefits to the society like furniture, timber, charcoal, fodder, food, posts,
piles, pulp and paper, gum, tannin, fuel wood, pulpwood, resin, fertilizer, carved articles etc. Tea
plant needs (50–70%) diffused sunlight. High isolation above 0.3 g cal/cm–2/min–1 is not only
unnecessary but could be detrimental to photosynthesis by the tealeaves. The need of shade is
irrevocable especially in Bangladesh condition. It all points to the beneficial effects of shade trees
in conserving soil moisture during the driest part of the year, adding organic matter, effecting a
higher rate of increase in leaf area and accumulation of dry weight, reducing and buffering the
effects of fluctuations in soil temperature, reducing the leaf temperature, and allowing a
favourable partition of growth and valuation of the final product. Shade trees also act as
windbreak and shelterbelt and protect the main crop tea from mechanical damage done by strong
wind. To offset these undoubted good effects of shade trees there are also various risks. Shade
trees are always a potential source of infection by diseases but the risk is not very marked if shade
trees are treated properly. Shallow rooted shade trees compete with tea plant for nutrient and
moisture. Deep-rooted shade trees are out from this danger. The system of pollarding shade trees
and using their foliage as a green manure reduces the possible harmful effects of shade to a
minimum. A light stand of trees (70–140 trees/ha) is commonly recommended because heavy
shading (>200 trees/ha) will increase the formation of a large canopy due to limitation of sunlight.
At Kamaichora tea estate the average volume of Albizzia chinensis was 144.41cubic meter per
hectare. At Rasidpur tea estate the average volume of Albizzia odoratissima was 216.55 cubic
meter per hectare.
1
1. INTRODUCTION
Shade trees are those trees, which are used for providing shade over the tea plantation.
Planting of shade trees has become an integral component of tree plantation and management
throughout the tea growing areas in the world. Shade is possibly one of the most well investigated
research problems in tea. It attracted the attention of tea scientists world over, particularly since the
second world war; its role in tea growing was intensively debated in east Africa (child, 1961), Sri
Lanka (Joachim, 1961; Visser 1961 a; b), South India and Tockli (Hadfield, 1974a; b). The problem
acquired and added significance because of conflicting results that emanated from investigations
carried out in tea growing areas. Despite the controversies, it is quite certain that shade trees are
essential for modulating the tea environment of tea ecosystem and improving soil fertility and hence
shade tree is very important for optimum growth of tea.
Tea is a shade loving plant. 50-70% diffused sunlight is needed for better tea production
(Sana, 1989). Considering the intensity and duration of sunlight, daily 5 hours sunlight is optimum for
tea growth (Amin, 2003). If the intensity of sunlight is reduced, production increases to 40% (Amin,
2003). As cloudy sky is not favourable for tea growth, at the same time intense sunlight, excess
temperature, or too much cold may stunt the growth of tea plant. Tea cultivation becomes affected at
temperature higher than 30oC and lower than 12oC. Tea plant is always favoured by its natural state
of forest. Different research findings show that monthly mean temperature less than 65oF and more
than 85oF are unfavourable for tea cultivation. But in our country air temperature are often outside
this range (Kibria, 1986). Selection and management of proper shade trees are needed to overcome
this situation. Shade trees help by reducing the rate of evaporation of the soil moisture and thus
maintain a suitable humid atmospheric condition (Anon, 1984).
Bangladesh is producing tea under marginal climatic and soil conditions. A moderate shade,
which allows 50-70% sunshine in the plantation, is essential for the optimum growth of tea in
Bangladesh. So, right type of shade trees and their proper management is prerequisite for successful
tea culture. A large number of jungle trees have been tried in the past as shade trees but only a few of
them proved suitable in the long run (Chowdhury and Kibria, 1977). The use of leguminous species as
shade tree for tea is common in Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. Leguminous species are preferred
because they help in conservation of soil moisture by reducing the evaporation rate and thus maintain
2
a humid atmospheric condition under the canopy. Soil moisture conditions also help the growth and
physiological activity of the root system and subsequent utilization of mineral nutrients.
About forty percent of tea crop on a dry matter basis consist of the element carbon, which is
derived from the atmospheric carbon dioxide and is built up into plant tissues by the action of sunlight
in the presence of the chlorophyll of the leaf. Adequate light is needed for this process but not fierce
insolation. Particularly with a shade loving species like tea, the limit of increase of photosynthetic
activity is soon reached, and if by increased sunlight temperatures are raised to the point at which the
stomatal pores are closed to prevent wilting through excessive transpiration of moisture, the
photosynthetic activity suffers correspondingly since it is through these same stomata that the carbon
dioxide gas gains entry to the active portion of the leaf. Shade therefore has a beneficial effect on the
fundamental mechanism of plant nurture or growth in tropical regions. The damage caused to tea by
hail and sun scrotch, the one reinforcing the other, is too well observed to need more than a mere
mention. Shade trees make a definite contribution to protection from both of these mishaps.
Unprotected soil can absorb heat so rapidly that in tropical countries like Bangladesh, the
temperature of the soil surface may exceed 30oC (54oF) higher than the adjacent atmosphere. Not
only does the high temperature dry out the soil but it accelerates the loss of organic matter from the
soil by literally burning it away. The destruction of organic matter whether by microorganism or
direct oxidation involves chemical reactions. The velocity at which a chemical reaction takes place is
increased by rise in temperature, an increases of 10oC (18oF) doubling that velocity. As a corollary of
this destructive temperature effect the soil structure upon which soil fertility depends deteriorates
since organic matter in the realm of nature is the structure builder par excellence. Shade trees protect
the soil from all these.
Shade trees not only contribute directly to the maintenance of even temperatures and soil
moisture control but also by their natural leaf fall, or by pollarding provide vegetable mulch. The
mulch gives even more intimate protection than the foliage canopy and also makes a contribution to
soil conservation by impeding soil wash. Here again the action is two-fold, first by straight forward
blanketing of the soil and, even more important, by assisting in the rapid percolation of rainfall.
Mulch prevents the “running” of erosive soils. Shade trees with a more robust root system are capable
of overcoming the resistance of physically bad soils. Where their roots go, tea roots will follow. The
sub soling action of shade trees is not the least important of their function.
3
Shade tree is planted at the starting period of tea cultivation in the garden. It is better to plant
the shade one year before the planting of tea. Permanent shade trees take a long time to provide
optimum shade. For this reason temporary shade is planted for first 4-5 years (Sana, 1989). Shade
trees not only used as shade provider, but it also produce fuel wood timber, foods (leaves, pods or
flowers) for people fodder, production of tannins, gums, medicines and services like erosion control,
living fences, ornamentals, environmental protection (FAO, 1987). Shade trees are deep-rooted plants,
which grow better at the deep soil and hence do not interfere with the root system of the tea plant.
The height of the shade trees could become crucial in influencing the percentage of light
intensity that would ultimately reach the tea bushes under its canopy. The light intensity in the same
section shaded tea varies seasonally because of the movement of the sun. Thus, light intensity even in
the shaded section remains lower towards the later part of the growing season (September-October)
then in May-June due to movement of the sun. This also creates conditions of overlapping of shadows
from the shade trees and the degree of overlap is determined by the height of the shade trees. This is
also of great importance because if overlapping of shadows reduces the light intensity beyond a
minimum, it may adversely affect the yield of tea. We can fulfill our requirements by planting suitable
shade trees and by using wasteland in every tea estate through proper plantation programme.
4
2. OBJECTIVES
The main objective of this project paper is to scrutinize the over all management system of tea
garden and importance of shade providing species in the management of tea gardens of Bangladesh.
The general objectives can be summarized as follows:
I). To know the present status of Rasidpur and Kamaichora tea estates.
II). To identify the main shade trees used in Bangladesh tea gardens.
III). To know the importance of shade trees in tea plantation.
IV). To know the growing condition of shade trees including climate and soil factors.
V). To have knowledge about the interaction of tea plant and shade trees.
VI). To know about the planting procedure of shade trees along with the plants and other green
manuring crop and see the best performer in each garden.
VII). To know about the influence of shade on the incidence of pest in tea plantation.
VIII). To know about the provided spacing of shade trees in different tea gardens in relation to
topography and aspect.
IX). To know about the techniques of raising nurseries of shade trees.
X). To know about the rotation of shade trees.
XI). To know about various pest and diseases of shade trees and their control measure.
XII). To know the growth performance of shade trees in different site condition.
XIII). To evaluate different beneficial and harmful effect of shade trees on the tea climate.
XIV). To know about the selecting criteria of shade trees for specific purpose.
XV). To know about various utilization of shade trees other than providing shade to the tea
plants.
XVI). To develop suggestions for the improvement of efficiency and method of establishment of
shade trees about the shade.
XVII). To evaluate the present condition and growth performance of shade trees in the two
selected tea gardens in Bangladesh.
5
3. METHODOLOGY
Review of literature: Both field visit and personal communication were made to relevant
persons to obtain information on various aspects of shade tree management. Attempts were also made
to review various articles, books and journals to collect available literature in a number of libraries
namely library of Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong
(IFECU), Bangladesh Forest Research Institute (BFRI), Sholoshahar, Chittagong, Bangladesh Tea
Research Institute (BTRI), Srimongal, Maulavibazar.
Collection of Data/information: Personal Communication was made with forest officers,
Scientists of BTRI, managers of Tea Estates, to discuss different aspects of shade tree management.
Informations were collected systematically one after another and were enlisted in the notebook for
further assessment. Information were collected mainly in soil type, growing condition, environmental
requirements, planting technique of shade trees, types used, various beneficial and harmful effect of
shade trees to tea growth, shade vs. tea plant interaction, competition, role of shade in increasing tea
production, loping and uprooting technique, spacing, pest control, utilization of shade trees etc. The
relevant information and data was collected from Rasidpur tea estate, Hobiganj and Kamaichara Tea
Estate, Habigonj.
Reconnaissance survey: The author visited the tea estates to have a general idea of the every
pro and cons of management system of shade trees used in these gardens. For studying growth
performance of the shade trees in different locations data of height and d. b. h. of trees were taken
from two tea gardens, Rasidpur and Kamaichora. Under consideration species of shade trees were
Albizzia chinensis in the Kamaichora tea estate and Albizzia odoratissima in the Rasidpur tea estate.
30 m x 30 m random plots were taken, one in lower slope and another in upper slope in each garden.
Compilation of data: The collected data had been compiled into different sections under
different heads. Thus the data had been put into a systematic study work for seeding out the final
findings. Figures were taken directly from field, different books and international journals.
6
4. General description of rasidpur and kamaichora tea estate
4.1. Location and area
Rasidpur tea estate have established in 1978. The Rasidpur tea estate and Kamaichora tea
estate belong to Messers James Finlay and company. Rasid pur tea estate is situated about 20 Km and
Kamaichora Tea Estate 19 Km away on the East of Hobiganj thana under Hobiganj Districts. They are
on the way of Dhaka Sylhet high way. The total area of Rasidpur teas estate is 941.42 hectares of
which 414.75 hectares of land under tea only. The total area of Kamaichora Tea Estate is 754.72
hectares.
4.2. Tea Climate
The distribution of rainfall plays a vital role on the growth of the tea plant and shade trees.
While the temperature, photoperiod and latitude determine the cropping season of tea. An evenly
distributed rainfall through the year is needed for proper growth of tea plants. The hilly slopes area
where water drained away rapidly is favourable for the cultivation. The variation of temperature and
rainfall seasonally, influences greatly in production of tea. In Bangladesh, rainy season prevails from
April to September. Tea grows well in areas with low range of diurnal (daily) variation and fairly high
relative humidity (67-85%) during the greater part of the year. Maximum temperature ranges from
27.1o C to 28.6o C and minimum temperature ranges from 9.3o C to 20.4o C (Rashid, 1985). It is found
that 1270 mm annual rainfall is marginal for tea cultivation (Sana, 1989).
The annual rainfall recorded at Rasidpur tea estate was about 1692.7 mm in 1995 (Personal
communication). The average temperature in Kamaichora tea estate in January is 18.5oC and annual
rainfall was 1623 mm. So, the climatic conditions are favourable for the two studied tea gardens.
4.3. Tea soil
4.3.1. Ideal condition for tea soil
Tea is a deep-rooted plant and requires a loose friable soil and easily penetrable subsoil at a
depth of 0.8-1.5 m for its proper growth. Various experiments revealed that soil of sandy loam to
loamy textures are favourable for tea plant sand shade trees with a pH ranges from 5.0 to 5.5 soil rich
with organic matter rich is suitable for better growth of tea (Personal com). Shade trees provide
organic matter for tea plant.
7
Tea cannot stand in waterlogged condition. As such for an ideal condition, water table must be
below the root zone during the wet part of the year.
4.4. Soil and topographic condition
4.4.1. Soil texture
Soil texture is considered with size of mineral particles. It refers to the relative proportions of
particles of various sizes in a given soil. Tea is a deep rooted plant and requires a loose and friable soil
and easily penetrable sub soil at a depth of 0.91-1.5 m for its safisfactory growth. Medium loam to
sandy loam is considered ideal for root poliferation and optimum growth considering this the soil at
Rasidpur and Kamaichora tea estates are good for tea cultivation. PH value of soil at Rasidpur is 4.6
and at Kamaichora it ranges from 4 to 5.
4.4.2. Soil structure
Structure refers to the arrangement of soil particles into groups or aggregate and regulates the
air and water content of soil. Soil structure takes part in the formation of macro and micro pores and is
responsible for movement of air, percolating water and holding soil moisture respectively. The
arrangement of soil particles is quite suitable for tea and shade trees in Rasidpur and Kamaichora tea
estates.
4.5. Topographic condition of Rasidpur and Kamaichora tea estates
Topography of the tea area of Rasidpur and Kamaichora may be divided into two units.
(i) High Flat which are the higher valleys constitute 20% of the land, they are 15-20 feet
above the plain and dissected by narrow valleys created by water erosion, soil are well
drained water without rock fragment in the substratum, but gentler slopes than tillahs, the
soil are suitable for tea cultivation.
(ii) Low flat, which are the valley floor and constitute about 80% of tea land they are flat or
slightly undulating with moderately well drained and subjected to flush flooding up to a
day after heavy shower in monsoon. The topsoil is brown the substratum is gray may be
relatively rich in organic matter but subjected to water logging.
8
Table 1 Bangladesh tea research institute test the soil sample of Rasidpur tea estate and give the
following information.
No. Description Rasidpur-1 Rasidpur -2
1. Rock
2. Topography
3. Depth (cm) 0-23 0-23
4. Sample no 1 12
5. Textural class Sandy Loam Sandy loam
6. pH 4.6 4.6
7. Organic carbon (%) 0.97 0.87
8. Total nitrogen (%) 0.093 0.084
9. Phosphorus (æg/g) 28.3 26.1
10. Potassium (æg/g) 96.0 24.0
11. Calcium (æg/g) 61.2 77.8
12. Magnesium (æg/g) 7.4 5.0
No such type of tabular information is available for Kamaichora tea estate.
5. SHADE TREE
Leguminous or non-leguminous trees, which are used in the tea, coffee, and cacao gardens for
providing shade to the main crop, are called shade trees. In the cultivation of tea 50-70% diffused
sunlight is needed for the optimum production of tea. Shades are used to provide that range of
diffused sunlight in the cultivation of tea (Sana, 1989). There are about 159 tea estates in Bangladesh
which are spread over Sylhet, Srimongal, Surma-Valley, Zaintapur, Jaflong, Shamshernager, Juri,
Monu Doloi, Kulaura, Naypara, Vanugas, Longla, Chunarughat, Laskarpur, Satgaon in Sylhet
Division, at Brahmonbaria, Fatiqchari, Rangunia, Ramgar, Patiya (Kanchannagar), Dohazari-Sangu
Valley Banshkhali (Chanpur-Balgoan) in Chittagong, and Kapti (Wagga Chitmorom) in CHTs where
various types of leguminous trees are planted as shade trees to provide optimum growing condition
for the cultivation of tea plant.
5.1. Types of shade trees
Shade trees are of mainly of two types’ viz., permanent shade trees and temporary shade trees.
Permanent shade trees are planted for a longer rotation (about 40 years). It takes a long period to be
9
established. That’s why at the initial stage of plantation temporary shade trees along with the
permanent shade trees are planted to protect the tea plants from direct sun light. When the permanent
shade trees become established after 5/6 years, the temporary shade trees are removed (Sana, 1989).
5.1.1. Permanent shade trees:
Name of some permanent shade trees used in the tea estates of Bangladesh are given below:
Tetuya koroi (Albizzia odoratissima)
Melacana koroi (Albizzia moluccana)
Deris (Deris robusta)
Sada koroi (Albizzia procera)
Kala koroi (Albizzia lebbek)
Chakua koroi (Albizzia chinensis)
Ipilipil (Leucaena leucocephalla)
Siris (Albizzia lucida)
Sissoo (Dalbergia sissoo)
Minjiri (Cassia siamea)
Acacia lenticularis
Dalbergia assamica
Gravillea robusta
Akashmoni (Acacia auriculiformis)
Mangium (Acacia mangium)
5.1.2. Temporary shade trees
The following temporary shade trees are commonly used in the tea estates of Bangladesh:
Indigofera (Indigofera teysmanii)
Arhor (Cajanus cajan)
Cajanus indicus
Tephrosia candida
Gliricidia (Gliricidia spp.)
Dadap (Erythrina lithosperma)
Desmodium gyroides
10
6. SOIL AND CLIMATIC REQUIREMENTS OF SOME SHADE TREE SPECIES
It is difficult at times to find a concise summary of the site requirements of shade tree species.
Soil and climatic requirements of some commonly used shade tree species in the tea gardens of
Bangladesh are given below (F. A. O, 1987/15. NITROGEN FIXING TREES. REGIONAL OFFICE
FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC (RAPA). pp 61-70)
6.1. Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Benth
Center of origin: Queensland, Papua New Guinea
Latitude range: 20 S – 7 S
Environment zone: Humid tropics
Minimum rainfall (mm): 1300 mm – 1700 mm
Annual rainfall: 1300 to 1700 mm
Dry season tolerance: 4 – 6 months
Mean maximum temp: 28 to 34 C
Mean minimum temp: 17 to 22 C
Mean annual temp: 24 to 29 C
Soil texture: Light/medium/heavy
Soil reaction: Alkaline/neutral/acid
Soil drainage: Seasonally waterlogged
Other soil requirements: Adaptable to most soil conditions, even poor,
sterile sandy soils
Main wood uses: Timber (4): pulp (2): fuel (2)
Forage uses: None
Other uses: Tannin (2): ornamental (2) erosion control () shade
()
6.2. Acacia mangium Willd
Center of origin: Australia, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia
Latitude range: 18 to 1 S
Environment zone: Humid and sub humid tropics
11
Minimum rainfall (mm): 1000 mm
Annual rainfall: 1000 to 2100 mm
Dry season tolerance: 2 to 4 months
Mean maximum temp.: 30 to 32 C
Mean minimum temp: 13 to 22 C
Mean annual temp: 22 to 25 C
Soil texture: Medium
Soil reaction: Moderately acid, tolerates 4.2 pH
Soil drainage: Moist; tolerates seasonal water logging
Other soil requirements: Tolerates very poor sites and slight salinity; often
grows on creek and swamp margins.
Main wood uses: timber (2): fuel (2): pulp (1): Veneer ():
Forage uses: Browse (4)
Other uses: Plantation of water catchments; firebreaks;
ornamental purposes shade.
6.3. Albizia falcataria (L.) Fosberg
Center of origin: North Moluccas, Indonesia;
naturalized in much of Far East
Latitude range: 10 S to 3 N
Environment zone: Humid tropics
Minimum rainfall (mm): 1000 mm
Annual rainfall: 2000 to 4000 m
Dry season tolerance: 0 to 2 months
Mean maximum temp.: 30 to 34 C
Mean minimum temp.: 20 to 24 C
Mean annual temp.: 22 to 29 C
Soil texture: Light/medium/heavy
Soil reaction: neutral/acid
Soil drainage: Free draining; moist
Other soil requirements: adaptable
Main wood uses: pulp (3): veneer (3): timber (3): fuel
(3)
12
Forage uses: Leaves (4)
Other uses: Tannin (): shade; cover for annual and
perennial crops in cluding coffee.
6.4. Albizia lebbek (L.) Benth.
Center of origin: Burma, India and Andaman Islands
Latitude range: 11 to 27 N
Environment zone: Semi-arid, sub humid and humid tropics
Minimum rainfall (mm): 500 mm
Annual rainfall: 500 to 2500 mm
Dry season tolerance: 2 to 6 months
Mean maximum temp: 26 to 36 C
Mean minimum temp: 10 to 26 C
Mean annual temp: 20 to 28 C
Soil texture: Light/medium/heavy
Soil reaction: Alkaline/neutral/acid
Soil drainage: Free draining
Other soil requirements: adaptable
Main wood uses: fuel (2): timber (2):
Forage uses: Leaves (2):
Other uses: gum (): Tannin (2): ornamental (2) erosion
control (2) shade tree.
6.5. Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.
Center of origin: India, Africa
Latitude range: 30 N to 30 S
Environment zone: semi-arid to sub humid
Minimum rainfall (mm):
Annual rainfall: 600 to 1000 mm
Dry season tolerance: extensive
Mean maximum temp: 35 C
Mean minimum temp: 18 C
Mean annual temp:
13
Soil texture:
Soil reaction: neutral
Soil drainage: Thrives in light sandy soils best in deep
loams
Other soil requirements: cannot withstand water logging
Main wood uses: fuel
Forage uses: Leaves (3): browse (1); seeds (2): pods (2)
Other uses: windbreak (2): medicinal (): green manure
(2): food (1): shade
6.6. Dalbergia sissoo Roxb.
Center of origin: Indus to Assam; Himalayas
Latitude range: 23 to 30 N
Environment zone: semi-arid, and humid tropics
Minimum rainfall (mm):
Annual rainfall: 500 to 4000 mm
Dry season tolerance: 3 to 6 months
Mean maximum temp: 35 to 45 C
Mean minimum temp: –2 to +5 C
Mean annual temp: 18 to 26 C
Soil texture: Light to medium
Soil reaction: Neutral to acidic
Soil drainage: Good; seasonally inundated
Other soil requirements: River beds and river flats
Main wood uses: timber (1): fuel (1): furniture (1):
cabinet work (1)
Forage uses: Leaves (3); pods (4)
Other uses: Honey flora (); erosion control, shade.
6.7. Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud.
Center of origin: Tropical Americas Naturalized in
Philippines and W. Nigeria
Latitude range: 6 to 19 N
14
Environment zone: sub-humid, humid tropics
Minimum rainfall (mm): 800 to 2300 mm
Annual rainfall:
Dry season tolerance: 4 to 6 months
Mean maximum temp: 34 to 41 C
Mean minimum temp: 14 to 20 C
Mean annual temp: 22 to 28 C
Soil texture: Medium
Soil reaction: Alkaline/neutral/acid
Soil drainage: Free draining; moist
Other soil requirements: Tolerates poor fertility soils
Main wood uses: fuel (1): timber (1)
Forage uses: Leaves (2)
Other uses: Bee pasture (): green manure (2): fodder ():
rat poison (): shade (1):
6.8. Leucaena leucocephala
Center of origin: S. W. Mexico and Central Guatemala
Latitude range: 15 to 17 N
Environment zone: semi-arid, sub humid and humid tropics
Minimum rainfall (mm): 400 mm
Annual rainfall: 600 to 1000 mm
Dry season tolerance: 2 to 6 months
Mean maximum temp: 24 to 32 C
Mean minimum temp: 16 to 24 C
Mean annual temp: 20 to 28 C
Soil texture: Light/medium/heavy
Soil reaction: Alkaline/neutral
Soil drainage: Moderately free draining
Other soil requirements: will not tolerate strongly acid soils or
waterlogging
Main wood uses: fuel
Forage uses: leaves (2)
15
6.9. Matching Species with Site
To find Shade Trees whose climate and soil requirements match conditions at the planting site,
the most important factors to consider are climate and soil characteristics. The choice of species
depends on the intended use, availability of planting materials and adaptability. Species selection,
whether from indigenous or exotic sources, involves matches species’ climatic and soil requirements
to the conditions at the plating site. The most important climatic factors to consider are amount and
distribution of rainfall and extremes in temperature. Principle soil properties include depth, texture,
fertility and pH. The best way to identify well-suited species is through a series of well-planned
species. The actual climatic conditions at the planting site may differ from those recorded at the
nearest meteorological station. In this case, it will be necessary to estimate or predict actual
conditions. Temperature variations are mainly due to changes in altitude. The commonly accepted
gradient is 0.5o C per 100-meter rise in elevation. Variations in rainfall cannot be predicted so rapidly.
The rainfall at the nearest meteorological station cannot be accepted unless the topography is fairly
similar between the two areas. Soil pH is important because it influences the availability of nutrients.
Some species are more adapted to alkaline soils (high pH) and other to acidic soils (low pH).
7. Growth performance of shade trees
The growth performance of shade trees was assessed in the field by visiting two tea estates at
Habigang district. The results are discussed here:
In Kamaichora tea estate in the lower slope the average height of the Albizia chinensis was
11.65 m, average diameter was 23.12 cm. Average volume per tree was 0.3842 m3 and average
volume per hectare was 145.14 m3. In the upper slope, the average height of the trees was found
11.21 m, average diameter 22.79 cm, average volume per tree was 0.3592 m3 average volume per
hectare was 143.68 m3. Considering upper and middle slope in the whole tea estate average volume
was 144.41 m3/ha.
16
Table 2 Showing the growth performance of A. chinensis and A. odoratissimaxin in Kamaichora and
Rasidpur tea estates respectively
Name of the
Tea Estate &
corresponding
species
Plot Average
height
(m)
Average
diameter
(cm)
Average
vol/tree
(m3)
No. of
trees in
30 m x 30
m plot
Average
vol/ha
(m3/ha)
Average
vol per
hectare
of the
garden.
(m3/ha)
Kamaichora
(Albizia
chinensis)
1 (lower
slope)
11.65 23.12 0.3842 34 145.14 144.41
2 (upper
slope)
11.21 22.79 0.3592 36 143.69
Rasidpur
(Albizia
odoratissima)
1 (lower
slope)
13.91 28.10 0.6776 29 218.00 216.55
2 (upper
slope)
13.17 27.32 0.6065 32 215.10
In Rasidpur tea estate in the lower slope the average height Albizia chinensis was 13.91 m,
average diameter was 28.10 cm, average volume per tree was .6776 m3 while average volume per
hectare was 218.0 m3. In the upper slope, the average height was 13.17 m, the average diameter was
27.32 cm, and average volume per tree was .6065 m3 while average volume per hectare was 215.10
m3. Considering upper and middle slope in the whole tea estate the average volume was 216.55
m3/ha.
It is observed from the data given in table 3 that the average height and diameter of the trees
growing in the lower slope is greater than the averages of those parameters in the upper slope.
Consequently the average volume of A. chinensis per hectare in the lower slope is 1.46 m3 higher than
that of upper slope in Kamaichora tea estate and the average volume of A. odoratissima in lower slope
per hectare is 2.90 m3 higher than that of upper slope in Rasidpur estate. This may be due to the fact
that in the lower slopes, there is a higher accumulation of litter and higher moisture content in
comparison with the upper slope. The age of A. chinensis is 18 years and A. odoratissima is 21 years
in the tea estates. Rotation of both the trees is considered to be 40 years in the tea estates. So, at the
17
end of the rotation, a volume of 320.91 m3/ha of A. chinensis and 412.47 m3/ha of A. odoratissima can
be obtained.
8. Silviculture of shade trees
An ideal shade tree is one of which the foliage forms a single layered canopy which cuts out
most of the infra-red rays but allows sufficient visible light to pass through the bush surface and does
not compete with the tea for nutrients and soil moisture. Albizzia chinensis (sau) almost satisfies these
ideal requirements. Other shade tree species found suitable for shading tea are A. odoratissima, A.
lebbek, Acacia lenticularis, Derris robusta and Dalbergla sericea. Indigofera leysmanii is a very
popular temporary shade trees species. Their important characteristics are:
A. chinensis: Deep root system. In droughty years it comes into full foliage only about the end
of April; very prone to red-rust and cankers from very early age.
A. odoratissima: Deep root system, easy and quick to establish, susceptible to red-rust and
plant lice in the nursery, prone to attacks by all kinds of leaf-eating and sucking pests, as well as to
wood and bark-borers.
A. lebbek: Very deep root system, is slow to establish and in early stage is susceptible to all
common pests and red-rust but later on grows well and provide good shade, rarely cankers, but has a
short life.
Acacia lenticularis: Deep root system, leaflet size and growth form similar to A. odoratissima;
has sharp thorns on the smaller branches.
Derris robusta: Deep root system, wood is hard, susceptible to attack by leaf-eating caterpillar
Baradessa omissa but virtually free from other pests and diseases and easy to establish; used in
mixture, with lopping makes a reasonable shade canopy.
Delbergia seficea: Deep root system, fairly quick growing, leaf size and growth habit similar
to A. lebbek, presently free from pest and diseases, difficult to raise from seed but grows very well
from root cuttings.
Grevillea robusta (Poteaceae) is a large, evergreen, hardy tree that grows to a height of 20-
30m. When lopped at a height of 5-6 m, it spreads out at the top, forming a good canopy of foliage,
18
and does not complete unduly with the tea. Due to a constant dropping of its leaves it produces heavy
mulch, which benefits the soil as organic matter.
Albizzia moluccana (Leguminosae) is a very large, fast-growing, evergreen tree, which grows
to a height of more than 30 m with a spreading habit and light feathery foliage. It has a canopy of a
mean of 13-15 m in diameter.
Erythrina lithosperma (Leguminosae), commonly named Dadap, is a fast growing tree and
easy to establish.
Gliricidia maculata (Leguminosae), is a fast growing, leguminous, medium sized, thorn less
tree, which reaches up to 10 m in height. It provides a large quantity of green material compared to
Dadaps and stands harder to more frequent lopping. Furthermore the tree is relatively free of pests and
diseases. Its main advantage is the ease with which it can be established. Gliricidia is commonly
established from cuttings, though it can be grown from seeds as well.
Acacia pruinosa and Acacia decurrens (Leguminosae) are small trees, which remain in a tea
field for 5-6 years, but do not stand up to lopping very well.
Indigofera teysmanzi: Shallow root system but is very quick growing and easy to propagate
by seed, cuttings or air-layerings, gives effective shade within one year at 2 X 2 m spacing, but if
uncontrolled its becomes susceptible to storm damage; with good management it can be maintained
for five to six years; apart from a hairy caterpillar and green aphids it is fairly pest free but suffers
from red-rust.
Choice of shade trees for single species of mixed species use is determined by the following
factors:
1) Growth habit
2) Pest and disease resistance
3) Economic life
4) Resistance to storm damage
5) Depth of root system
6) Suitability to the soils and climate of the district
19
8.1. Mixture of shade tree species
A) Intimate Mixtures: From the point of view of reducing the damages of epidemic pests and
diseases, it is desirable to use a number of species in mixture. The ideal mixture called 'intimate
mixture' is one where no two trees of a single species are adjacent to each other; a minimum of four
species is required for this combination:
a) Square planting
A B C D
C D A B
A B C D
C D A B
b) Triangular planting
A B C
C D A B
A B C D
C D A B
B) Non-intimate Mixtures: This is followed when use of intimate mixtures is not possible. The
dispersion of shade in this situation would be:
1) Tea and shade square planted
a) Two permanent shade species
A B A B
X X X
B A B A
X X X
C A B C
X X X
A B C A
20
Where X = temporary shade
b) Three permanent shade species
A B C A
X X X
B C A B
X X X
C A B C
X X X
A B C A
Apart from dispersion, the following factors should be considered in the arrangement of the
individual shade tree species in the mixture:
a) Relative crown diameters of species.
b) Relative potential rotations of species.
Large-crowned species should alternate with smaller ones; short rotation species should also
alternate with long rotation species.
8.2. Spacing of shade tree
Spacing is an important factor of management of shade trees in the tea gardens. Spacing which
must be provided varies with place, aspect of the slope, Phenology of the plant, rooting
characteristics, competitions with the tea crops etc. Following are some suggested spacing of shade
trees applicable for Bangladesh condition.
a) Temporary shade: 2 X 2 metres initially, thinned out to 4 X 4 metres later on.
b) Permanent shade: (based on shade given by mature A. chinensis).
Light shade: 15.24 m x 15.24 m (50' x 50) triangular or 13.7 m. X 13.7 m (45'x 45') square or
wider.
Medium shade: 13.7 m x 13.7 m (45' X 45) triangular or 12.2 m x 12.2 m (40'X 40') square.
21
Heavy shade: 10.67 m x 10.67 m (35' x 35) triangular or 9.14 m X 9.14 m (30' x 30') square or
closer.
For teelas and steeply slopping land it is better that a shade spacing of the type described as
heavy is used.
Table 3 Spacing of shade trees used in the Rasidpur and Kamaichora tea estates depending on location
(in m.)
Serial
No.
Kinds of shade trees Slope Plain/Fairly
slope South/west East North
1. Permanent shade tree 4.5 6 7.5-9 6
Initial stage after thinning 9 12 15-18 12
2. Temporary shade tree 2.25 3 3.75 3
8.3. Lay Out Of Tea / Shade / Green Crop
A standard layout of tea, shade tree and green crop suggested by D. L Sana, a famous tea
scientist of Bangladesh Tea Research Institute have been given below. It may vary in different
locations and tea-shade tree combinations. In Bangladesh tea, the temporary shade species, Indigofera
teysmanii is grown at spacings 3.0 to 4.6 m. (10′- 15′) depending on the topography of plantation.
When the permanent shade trees, viz. Albizzia odoratissima, A. lebbek and Derris robusta become
established after 5/6 years, the temporary shade trees are removed. The spacing of permanent shade
trees, varies from 3x3 m. to 5x5 m. (10'x10' to 15'xl5') square. While planting, the south and
south-west slope of the tillah should be avoided unless the proper shade is established beforehand.
A planting design for a composite tea plantation, which is adopted in principle, is shown in the
underlying figure. Bogamedeloa is sown in lines at distance of 240 cm. while the tea is planted at
spacing 120 cm. x 60 cm. The permanent shade trees are planted 6m x 6m. square, but temporary
shade at 3m. x 3m. spacing. One row of green crop is placed alternate of two rows of tea. The
placement of temporary shade may be adjusted along the shade trees or separate line at 3 m. apart.
22
23
8.4. Planting of shade trees
A general method for raising plantation of shade trees is suggested below:
(a) Method of planting: The best method is to plant out as one year old seedlings sleeve
grown or with a bethi. Where this is impracticable, good results can be had by carrot planting in
which roots are shortened to 30 to 45 cm in length while retaining as much of the laterals as possible.
At the time of planting, holes 60 cm deep (or even more for A. odoratissima) should be dug and 450 g
TSP plus 9 to 14 kg dry well rotted cattle manure per plant should be mixed with earth. In mature
square or triangular planted tea, it is usually best to remove a tea bush to plant a shade tree. In mature
close hedge planted tea, when inter planting permanent shade in the line of the hedge, two or better
three tea bushes should be removed to make way for a shade tree. Before lifting, the plant should be
pollarded at I to 2 in from ground irrespective of the method of planting. The cut should be protected
with a lump of fresh cattle manure pressed w ' ell around the stem.
(b) Time of planting: The most suitable time is when the soil is moist as it is between
February and April; in drought areas planting out may be delayed till some rain has fallen..
(c) Manuring of shade: Young shade trees may be manured as follows: Trees under 2.5 m in
height - 500 g TSP applied in broad ring of approximately 1.5 m diameter. Trees between 2.5 in and 4
in - 1.5 kg TSP in broad ring of approximately 3 m diameter.
(d) Maintenance of shade: To maintain a satisfactory shade canopy throughout the life of a
section of tea, the original shade stand should be interplanted with new shade, at such a pace that the
new shade is well established before the original shade comes to the end of its useful economic life.
Following the planting of shade either in mature tea that is being reshaded or in young tea, good
maintenance is essential to ensure that shade grows and the single-leaf canopy is achieved. The
temporary species will require frequent lopping until they are finally removed. In the first few years
after transplanting, the permanent species will require regular rounds of prophylactic sprayings
against pests and diseases. Once the permanent species takes over, it will be necessary to ensure that
there is only a single-leaf shade by lopping off the lower branches.
24
9. Propagation of shade trees
i) Selection of seed: Seed should be obtained from an area where the species is known to grow
well. Seed may be selected locally from species, which grow particularly well in that locality. The
mother tree (or trees) should possess good growth habit and be free of pests and diseases.
ii) Seed collection: Seed should be collected from the tree and not from the ground. In the
case of leguminous trees the pods should be collected only when they are ripe. Ripe seed will have
lost its greenish colour and be hard to the touch. The pods should be collected by lopping off the
branches to which they are attached when the majority turns brown they are stored on clean ground or
on a tarpaulin until the foliage dries out. The seeds are extracted from the pods by thrashing them with
long sticks and then winnowing.
iii) Seed treatment and storage: Seeds should be mixed with any insecticidal dust, for
example, 5 per cent gammaxene dust at the rate of 30 g per 15 kg seed. Seeds can be stored until
sowing time but it must be kept in a well-ventilated cool and dry place, either in sacks or shallow
boxes having wire gauze bottoms and tops.
iv) Preparation of sleeve nurseries: Polythene sleeves in 250 gauze of 25 to 30 cm width
lay-flat and 40 to 50 cm lengths are adequate. These could be filled with 4:1 parts of good soil and dry
well rotted cattle manure respectively. Mixing 0.5 kg TSP per cubic meter of the soil and cattle
manure mixture is beneficial. Soil should not be compact. Two to three seeds are planted in each
sleeve and when the seedlings become about 15 to 20 cm tall, the weaker seedlings are pulled out
leaving the best ones to grow. The best plants can be planted out at any time of the year as soon as
they become more than 1 m in height. To prevent the taproot from penetrating into the soil below the
sleeves, the sleeves should be shifted at frequent intervals.
v) Time of sowing: Seed can be sown any time from January to May with the provision of
irrigation facilities. March/April is, probably, the best months for sowing seeds. Hard-coated seeds
may be put in sacks and alternating soaked and dried three or four times. Seeds with very hard seed
coat may be soaked in 50 per cent sulphuric acid for 30 minutes, then washed in sodium bicarbonate
or ordinary washing soda, and sown.
vi) Drainage of shade nursery: Good drainage system should be provided in the shade
nursery area to allow the roots to grow to a good depth.
25
vii) Control of pests and diseases in the nursery: Prophylactic sprayings at monthly rounds
with suitable insecticides and with a fungicide at fortnightly intervals between April and June help
prevent damages by pests and diseases
10. Establishment of shade
In view of the seriousness of the situation immediate programmes of reestablishing shade
should start or should be intensified in many estates, both in new clearings as well as in nature tea
fields. Permanent shade should be established early during the period of rehabilitation with grass, so
that the shade trees will serve their purpose by the time the tea is planted. The grass surrounding every
point of planting should be kept low in order to admit light and prevent a smothering of the shade
plants. The shade trees should be planted in the rows where the tea is anticipated to be planted. In
mature tea fields it is advisable to plant shade trees soon after the pruning of the tea to facilitate a
speedy establishment of the shade plant. Shade reduces transpiration by affecting the microclimate of
the leaf, which also includes a reduction of solar radiation and wind speed.
Figure 1: High and low shade of Grevillea and Dodaps in tea plantation
A light stand of trees (70-140 trees/ha) is commonly recommended because heavy shading
(>200 trees/ha) will increase dormancy and will influence the formation of a larger canopy due to the
limitation of sunlight. Shade trees should be planted as a mixed stand of high shade, like Grevillea,
and low shade, like Erythrina lithosperma (Dadaps) or Gliricidia. For the purpose of establishing
such a system of shade the high shade trees have to be planted at a wider spacing with the low shade
trees, which are to occupy an intermediary position
26
Suitable shade trees for high-grown teas are Grevillea robusta, spaced 12m x 12m, giving
approximately 74 plants per ha, Erythrina lithosperma, Acacia pruinosa, and Acacia decurrens spaced
6m x 6cm. For the mid- and low-grown teas, the author recommends Grevillea robusta (12m x 12m)
and Gliricidia maculata (6m x 6m).
11. Effect of shade per se
The very fundamental issue of shade problem is whether or not a reduction in illumination
intensity by shade will have a positive effect on yield and growth of tea. Preliminary experiments
using overhead mechanical shade of split bamboo laths to reduce light intensity by about half showed
that growth, yield and weight of prunings of teas under the bamboo screens were significantly higher
than those under full sun (Barua, 1960). Although the magnitude of increase somewhat varied in the
experiment, the inevitable conclusion was that shade indeed had a beneficial effect on the growth and
yield of tea, at least under Assam conditions.
Although bamboo screens (mechanical shade) in the experiments mentioned above helped in
conserving soil moisture during the driest, part of the year, it is possible that roots of young shade
trees and tea would compete for available moisture in the top 30 cm of soil profile. The degree of
competition may vary according to the species of shade trees but properly managed stands of mature
and good shade trees like A. chinensis and A. odoratissima would also help conserve soil moisture,
and may even negate the effect of competition, if there is any. For example, in south India, soil
moisture level at two depths-0 to 23 cm and 23 to 46 cm, shaded by Erythina lithosperma (Dadap)
was higher than in un-shaded-tea-areas during the driest part of the year from October to March, and
there was no over-competition for moisture between tea and shade trees (Venkataramani, 1961). The
basic point is that a properly managed stand of mature, deep-rooting shade trees is unlikely to
compete with tea for water during a period of water scarcity. In fact, some species of shade trees may
even help conserve moisture. Moreover, the variation in crop yield under different shade trees is also
closely related to soil moisture at 2.5 cm to 45 cm soil depth at the end of March in a drought year;
and strong positive correlation exists between the soil moisture and yield (Barua and Dutta, 1961).
12. Shade trees and litterfall
An additional advantage of shade tree is the organic matter it adds to the soil. The total weight
of organic matter in the form of leaf, twig and pod droppings by a mature stand of A. chinensis trees
spaced 12 in square comes to around 5 tonnes per ha, with a nitrogen content of 77 kg per ha (Dutta,
27
1960). In east Africa, the total annual leaf fall from Grevillea robusta shade trees. and tea bushes is
6.5 tonnes dry matter per acre (Goodchild and Foster-Barham, 1958); it is much higher than what is
common in Assam.
The actual quantity of litter from shade trees will vary with the species, age, spacing, locality,
and. manuring etc. The litter from a stand of a A. chinensis trees casting moderate shade (50 to 60- per
-cent light intensity) adds annually 2500 to 5,000 kg; dry matter per ha with a nutrient content of N
-63 to 126 kg; P2O5 - 1,8 to 36 kg; K2O – 22 to 44 kg; CaO–32 to 64 kg; MgO- 16 to 32 kg ha–1
(Hadfield, 1974a). Complete removal of litter from shaded plots is capable of causing an approximate
15 per cent drop in yield, but an addition of the litter to plots in full sun plots would also raise the
yield to an equal extent though it is not clear how the yield increase is affected
It is worth noting that nitrogen fixing capacity of the leguminous shade trees in, tea, is still a
suspect and precious little is known of the amount of atmospheric nitrogen fixed by the roots of these
legurninous trees. However, it is most likely that in the presence of large quantities of added soluble
nitrogenous fertilizers in tea fields, the fixation of nitrogen by the shade trees is greatly reduced
(Wight, 1959b; Visser, 1961a).
There is some evidence that leaf area and dry weight increase significantly under shaded
conditions. Shade is also effective in enhancing the rates of increase of the leaf area and dry weight
with age of leaf, and in decreasing the leaf area, dry weight ratio. The rates of increase of leaf area,
dry weight and dry weight per unit leaf area are important parameters for yield projections of tea, and
shade appears to have a positive influence on them.
Expectedly, soil temperatures recorded during summer are much higher in full sun than under
50 per cent light - possible under a stand of shade. Also during much of this period aeration is
inadequate as soil water remains at or above field capacity, but shade tree roots can help in improving
soil aeration because of their capacity to penetrate deep into the soil. This apart, mature tea shaded by
A. chinensis and manured with 84 kg N per ha as ammonium sulphate is conducive to the growth of a
higher proportion of feeding roots, during the growing season (April to October) than those exposed
to full sun (Barua and Dutta, 1961), and this may well be a premium against drought damage.
An important aspect of shade is its influence on the build up of diseases and pests, at times
favourable but most times unfavourable. Mites, for -example, are generally adverse to shade, but
28
blister blight and black rot thrive well under shade. Red spider and other tea mites thrive well under
unshaded condition (Das, 1961; Banerjee, 1969). Mite damage is more severe on unshaded rather than
shaded tea. Just the opposite effect has been reported from Sri Lanka (Danthanaryana and Ranaweera,
1972), though in Indonesia the incidence of orange mite on tea increased considerably following
removal of shade trees (De Weille, 1959).
13. Shade and light intensity
From the physiological point of view, perhaps one of the most important effects of shade is its
indirect influence on growth of tea. Net assimilation rate (NAR) of young tea ranging from extreme
China to extreme Assam type is related to low light intensity, ranging from 20 to 100 percent. In all
tea varieties, leaf area remains nearly steady between 50 per cent intensity and full sunlight. However,
the leaf area is maximum under 35 to 50 per cent light intensity but is minimum in full sun. In
contrast, the weight of the whole plant does not vary significantly between light intensity of 50 and
100 per cent.
The total plant weight being the product of NAR and leaf area, it follows that growth will be
maximum in reduced light intensity provided the reduction in leaf area between light and partial shade
is very large. The optimum light intensity for maximum growth will then shift more and more towards
full light as the difference in. leaf area between fun light and reduced light gradually diminishes
(Barua, 1961). The yield of plucked shoots in all cultivars is generally maximum under 50 per cent
light intensity - the relative values for the four light intensities being 50, 35, 100 and 20 per cent
(Barua, 1961).
14. Shade and tea leaf temperature
At ambient temperatures of 30o to 32o C leaf temperatures of horizontal and erect-leaf tea in
full sunshine may reach 40o to 45o C, but in shaded leaves they remain 10 to 20 C above the, ambient
value. However, fully exposed horizontal leaves are generally 2o to 4o C, warmer than erect or semi
erect leaves, but a leaf temperature of 40o C is common to all types of leaves under unshaded
condition when the ambient temperatures are from 30o to 32o C (Hadfield, 1968). This temperature
range is common in Assam during April to October when tea productivity is at its peak. Apart from
temperature effect, -net photosynthesis also declines sharply when leaf temperature goes beyond 35o
and between 39o and 42o C it virtually stops. But respiration continues up to 48o C, above which, leaf
tissues get irrevocably damaged (Hadfield, 1968).
29
15. Effect of shade trees on light climate
The measurement of light, intensity, its duration and spectral analysis in shade and, sun
provide a fairly adequate characterization of the light regime, which is optimal for growth and
productivity of tea. The spectral composition of light in full sun, and under shade varies between 400
and 1,400 n m at different hours of the day and times of the year under-varying weather, conditions.
The light pattern under shade also varies with the distance from the tree, hours of the day time of the
year and cloud cover of the sky (Hadfield, 1974a).
Shade trees absorb a considerable amount of radiation of different wavebands from the solar
spectrum. Even under light, shade, on a bright summer day, there is a marked reduction of those
wavebands, (400-450 nm and 600-700 nm) associated with action peak of photosynthesis. This means
that a considerable amount of useful radiation is removed from the solar spectrum before it reaches tea
canopy. However, shade tree canopy of this nature also absorbs a large amount of harmful infra-red
radiation-over 70 per cent of the total present in full sunlight. It is likely that this reduction in infra-red
radiation and hence cooler leaves compensates well for the reduction of potentially useful visible
wavebands under climatic conditions of high ambient temperatures and low wind speeds common in
Assam (Hadfield, 1974 b).
The light pattern on the surface of individual tea bushes in the north-south and east-west rows
between rows of shade trees under diverse growing conditions is a heterogeneous mixture of light
intensities, varying from full light to very low light, and cannot therefore be properly expressed as,
percentage of full sunshine. Under sunny conditions some bushes receive full sunlight but those in
dense shade receive no sun flecks and yet a third category receives sun flecks light of greater or lesser
intensity. The proportion of each class of bushes receiving light of different intensity varies
throughout the day depending on the total irradiance received from the sun (Hadfield, 1974 a, b);
therefore light absorption and distribution are rather dynamic with no definite pattern emerging for
generalization.
Shade pattern under 10 common species of shade trees varies greatly because of difference in
light transmission through their canopies and this difference is species specific. Indeed, if the canopy
characteristics and light transmission by different species of shade trees are known, it is often possible
to screen potentially useful shade trees. By use of the area survey method' (Evans, 1956), it is even
possible to eliminate many species before the field trial stage and only those trees which allow an
30
adequate proportion of light in the form of sun flecks to penetrate the canopy can be selected right
way instead of going for the time consuming and expensive replicated trials (Hadfield, 1974 a).
The distribution of light intensity as a percentage of visible radiation at the bush surface also
varies with the plant types having different leaf angles, such as, those ranging from erect to droopy
leaves. But in most, cages, the first 10 cm layer of leaf absorbs 70 to 90 per cent of visible- radiation
incident on its surface and visible light reaches the lower layers of leaves in the canopy' either through
gaps in the canopy or by reflection from upper leaves (Hadfield, 1974 a).
Light penetration into tea canopies also depends on leaf angle. Generally the erect and
semi-erect leaves allow a greater penetration of light than the horizontal leaves where light is
restricted only to the top layer of the foliage (Hadfield, l 974 a). This finding could be of considerable
practical importance in the selection of plant architecture suitable for optimal growth and productivity.
16. Shade and partition of growth
In a classical Shade and partition experiment at Tocklai, the effect of tree shade (A. chinensis)
and mechanical shade (bamboo lath screen) on the productivity of tea cultivars was compared against
those in full sun, with and without optimum nutrients (Hadfield, l 974 a). The cultivars selected
ranged from hybrids to extreme Assam variety in Assam, and weights of pluckings and prunings were
recorded continuously for 10 years. In the eleventh year one complete block was uprooted to record
the weights of roots and frames for each cultivar in each treatment. The main conclusions were:
a) Yields of plucked shoots over the 10 years period by all cultivars were at maxima under
shade trees and minimum under the screens with the sun plots occupying an intermediate position.
But the screen plots out yielded the sun plots once these plants covered the ground by profuse growth.
b) The total biomass was also maximum under shade though the difference in biomass weight
between sun and mechanical shade was very small. But the weight of root was highest in full sun
followed by shade and mechanical shade.
c) The most significant aspect was that even the addition of balanced nutrients (NPK and
micro-nutrients in some years) in plots under full sun or in mechanical shade failed to compensate for
the decline in yield in unshaded tea.
31
Perhaps the most important effect of shade tree is the favourable partition of growth between
different plant organs that it causes. The ratios of plucking to prunings, plucking to total growth, and
top to root are generally the highest under shaded trees. Indeed the percentage of plucking to total
growth (Plucking plus pruning plus frame plus root), that is, the harvest index was highest under a
shaded tree. It is possible therefore that shading diverts a relatively larger fraction of the assimilates
towards the production of pluckable shoots which economically are the most useful fraction of growth
(Magambo and Cannell, 1981).
17. Shade effect on quality of made tea
A related interesting but important aspect of shade is its overt influence on the quality of made
tea although a causal explanation is lacking. The strength and colour of liquor appear to improve
significantly in 50 per cent light though infused leaf from plants in full light was categorized as of
high value (Dutta and Basu, 1955). The main conclusion to be drawn from this and related studies is
that reduction of light intensity to about 50 per cent of full sun does not have any adverse effect on the
quality of made teas; if anything, the overall character of the teas slightly improves at relatively low
light intensity (Barua, 1961).
18. Current perspective
The experience in northeast India would suggest that shade does have an agronomical and
physiological role to play in enhancing productivity of tea. It is of interest that the role of a shade is
now being reassessed even by traditionally non-shaded tea growing countries. Nevertheless, there are
still some problems of assessing and measuring the true effects of shade.
First, it is necessary to know precisely the amount of atmospheric nitrogen that can actually (it
at all) be fixed by the different leguminous shade trees used in tea areas, and the probable and possible
influence of environmental factors like temperature, light intensity, day-length and their interactions
in the fixation of nitrogen. This problem is of considerable topical interest as currently a search is on
for more efficient nitrogen fixers among legumes to fertilize tea soils.
The other aspect is that very little information is currently available on suspected competition
between shade trees and tea. Although devising parameters for measuring competition is no doubt
difficult, but if there is any competition at all is not clear. Perhaps, use of isotopes will be helpful. It is
also necessary to evaluate the effect of shade on the microclimate in the immediate vicinity of the tea
32
plants, including soil climate of the root zone as it has great influence on nutrient uptake and other
physiological processes.
The basic question, however, is whether or not there are tea genotypes that would grow better
in sun (sun-lover) or under shade (shade-lover). A survey of germ-plasm would help in identifying
plants of either category. This does not however overlook the basic fact that penetration of light into
the bush canopy is dependent on the leaf orientation.
The height of shade trees could become crucial in influencing the percentage of light intensity
that would ultimately reach the bushes under its canopy. The light intensity in the same section of
shaded tea varies seasonally because of the movement of the sun. Thus, light intensity even in the
shaded section remains lower towards the later part of the growing season (September-October in
Assam and the Dooars) than in May-June due to movement of the sun. This also creates conditions for
overlapping of shadows from shade trees and the degree of overlap is determined by the height of the
shade trees. This is of great significance because if overlapping of shadows reduces the light intensity
beyond a minimum, it may adversely affect the yield. Judged in this context, none of the shade
species currently being used will appear to be ideal, except perhaps A. chinensis which comes closer
towards the concept of an ideal shade, but this species is prone to canker and is dying out in parts of
Assam. Despite intensive search for alternative species for the last few decades both among
indigenous and exotic species, an ideal species of shade tree still remains as elusive as ever. However,
the recent approach to propagate shade trees by tissue culture may provide opportunities to develop
the ideal plant by genetic recombination (Phukan and Mitra, 1983).
1n summation, the need for shade trees is irrevocable if one were to go by the hard evidence
collected in the past 40 years. It all points to the beneficial effects of shade in conserving soil moisture
during the driest part of the year, adding organic matter, effecting a higher rate of increase in leaf area
and accumulation of dry weight, reducing and buffering the effects of fluctuations in soil temperature,
reducing leaf temperature and allowing a favourable partition of growth without affecting the quality
and valuation of the final product. All these are of consequence in enhancing productivity of tea but
physiological aspect of shade is also worth noting.
33
19. Management of Shade Trees
It has been noted that monthly mean temperatures less than 65o and more than 85o F are
unfavourable for tea cultivation. But in our climate air temperatures are often outside this range
(Kibria, 1986). Shade trees help by reducing the rate of evaporation of the soil moisture and thus
maintain a suitable humid atmospheric condition. So, there is a great need of shade trees for suitable
growth of tea. (Usually trees, which grow within the pH range of 5.0-6.0, are used as shade trees in
the plantation. Deep-rooted species which retain leaves during dry weather (e.g. Albizia odoratissima)
could be used (Anon, 1984). Particularly in our climate, successful tea culture mostly dependent on
selection of right type of shade trees and their proper management.
Figure 2: Mixture of various shade trees (Ipil-ipil, Shada koroi, Chakua koroi) used at Rasidpur Tea Estate
Previously a large number of forest trees have been tried as shade trees but only a very few of
them have proved suitable (chancing and Kibria, 1977). When there is a continuous operation, in that
cases leguminous trees are preferable to use as shade trees.
Generally Albizia lebbek are used as shade trees in most tea gardens of Bangladesh. Albizia
chinensis is a fast growing shade tree and produce excellent shade but it is more sucptable to canker
disease than any other species of Albizia (Hassan and Chowdhury, 1964). The range of pH values for
the satisfactory growth of Albizia chinensis is 5.5 to 6.5 the optimum growth is found at pH 6.0. It
prefers slightly to moderately acidic soil (Choudhury and Kibria, 1977).
34
Another vital use of trees is they can be used as windbreaks. Single row windbreaks are
considered to be better than multi row windbreaks since the farmer gives protection against wind
vetocity for a greater distance (Kibria, 1986). While planting shade trees at the early stage of tea
cultivation, spacing should be carefully maintained. In care of permanent shade trees, the distance
between two trees should be 9-12 m. depending on the site condition.
The system of pollarding shade, trees and using their foliage, as a green manure reduces the
possible harmful effects of shade to a minimum. By the very act of periodic lopping the rate of growth
of a tree is controlled and at the same time, the proportion of useful foliage to probably unwanted
wood is favorably altered, just as pruning a tea bush encourages crop growth. A long-term policy of
shade should make provision for replacement by building up an age-rotation of trees. This will
involve denser planting than the optimum at first so as to get shade quickly, followed by thinning by
stages. The ideal to be aimed at is rows of shade at two or three different stages of maturity, and to
achieve this some immature trees will have to be sacrificed in the initial stages of the programme.
Thinning of the stand is best done by rows so as to ease the problem of felling and removal
and should always be preceded by ringing. The correct time for felling is just before pruning the tea so
that unavoidable damage can in part be rectified at the subsequent pruning. This system demands
forethought so that all these operations; ringing, felling and pruning of the tea, dovetail correctly into
one another in point of time. Probably the prejudice against shade, where that prejudice exists, arises
from unsatisfactory yields under old shade allowed to outlive its usefulness. Examples could be
quoted where total removal of shade has had an immediate beneficial effect on crop, for this reason,
but the benefit is short-lived. Accurate shade experiments are notoriously difficult to carry out
because so many interlinked factors are present.
19.1. Lopping and Uprooting of Shade Trees
Periodically the lopping of low shade trees is a very important practice to prevent too much
shade during the rainy periods. For the tree itself lopping is necessary in order to produce a
satisfactory recovery and adequate shade during the drier months. Only branches at the up end of the
stump should be encouraged to grow and all other shoots which are/below as well as those which
grow between the plucking table of the tea bushes should be removed with a sharp knife without
damaging the bark of the stump. A stripping of the branches by hand should be avoided because this
will damage the bark of the main trunk of the tree and finally retard the growth of the shade tree. The
35
thinning-out of large branches is necessary to prevent the tree from becoming top heavy and liable to
be blown down,
The most suitable time for lopping the branches is when they show maturity on the bark of the
stem and not, when the branches are green and tender. When lopped at this stage, recovery is
satisfactory even with a completely branched-out canopy. The shade trees in the up-country could
generally be lopped two times a year, in the low-country up to 3 times. Depending on the planting
district and annual variation of precipitation the first lopping in the Wet Zone could be done around
March/April and the second by the end of August, when the dry period is over. In the low-country a
third lopping can take place in November. For the districts in the Dry Zone lopping should be carried
out in October and partly in February, which depends on the precipitation quantity during the first
intermonsoonal period. In case of predictable small quantities of precipitation during the
above-mentioned period the crowns of the shade trees should not be lopped completely, then only a
thinning-out of the largest branches is recommended. The Loppings should be placed as green manure
and mulch between the rows of the tea plants, which will increase the soil fertility and reduce soil
erosion during the rainy period as well as evaporation during the dry spell.
When the time for lopping the shade trees has come, the topography as well as the exposition
of the tea fields should be taken into consideration: lopping should first of all start in the steep to very
steep westernly exposed tea lands and then in those of an eastern exposition. The trees should be
completely lopped in the westernly exposed fields, whereas a thinning-out of large crown branches
would be enough in easternly exposed fields. In the Wet Zone the first rainy period in the course of
the year is the first intermonsoon, which is characterized by sunny, cloudless mornings and by heavy
afternoon showers. After the sunrise the easternly exposed tea lands still get intensive sunlight and the
not fully lopped shade trees protect the tea bushes against sun-scorch and over-heating.
During the field rounds the author has observed that the westernly exposed steep to very steep
tea lands get full sunlight only around 11 a.m. or even later. When the diurnal temperature and the
convectional movement of air masses have reached their maximum around 2 p.m., heavy
intermonsoonal showers start. The sky is fully covered with clouds and no direct sunlight reaches the
tea bushes. Therefore a complete lopping of shade trees in the westernly exposed tea lands is
absolutely necessary with the onset of the first intermonsoonal season.
36
19.2. Uprooting
When the old tea bushes are uprooted prior to replanting, old stands of shade trees should also
be uprooted. The quickest and safest way to kill a shade tree completely is to ring-bark it. Thereby the
roots and shoot simultaneously die off and harbouring root diseases causes no trouble. The idea of
ring-barking is to deplete the food reserves in the root and the stump. To achieve this bark must be
removed over a length of 30 cm along the trunk at about chest height. The ring barking of trees like
Grevillea should commence two years before actual felling. It then takes eight months to two years to
die, the time for dying depending on the size of the tree. Dadaps and Gliricidias should be ring-barked
about 6-8 months before the actual removal of the trees is planned. The felling of the trees should be
done 2-3 months after all leaves have yellowed. Once a tree has been felled, it is advisable not to
allow a stump to remain above soil level. It should be cut to a point below soil level and covered with
earth.
20. The Bad Effects of Shade
To offset these undoubted good effects of shade there are various risks. Wherever there is
widespread fungus disease of tile leaves of tea the presence of shade is likely to prove a significant
factor encouraging its persistence India with the Blister blight a humid atmosphere in the vicinity of
the leaves encourages the quick germination or the disease spores. After their release the spores must
germinate and tile growing thread-like mycelium must penetrate into the leaf within a matter of a few
hours or it will die. Of the millions of spores that do fall on leaves, only the favoured few survive.
Sunlight is lethal to them and so is rapid drying of the leaf after rain and dew. Air movement and
evaporation are both decreased by shade, which accordingly reacts favourably on fungus infection.
Brown Blight (Colletotrichum camelliae) is common and enters the leaf through wounds such as are
caused by hail Once a fungus has established itself in the leaf, climatic conditions cease to have in
immediate effect on its chance of survival and as has been remarked earlier, shade by protecting the
foliage from a measure of laceration is a help rather than a hindrance in the prevention of this
particular disease.
Shade trees are always a potential source of infection by root diseases such as Armillaria, but
this risk is not very marked if shade trees are treated properly and are ringed before they have to be
remove competition for nutrients is not of great importance because, apart from what is locked up in
37
the permanent tree structure, the nutrients that the shade trees absorb are returned to tile soil and in tile
case of the leguminous species, there is a net nutrient gain nodule nodule-fixed nitrogen.
It is also possible to have shade. So dense that the optimum light intensity, even for shade
loving species, is not reached. When this occurs there is direct evidence of it in the drawing up of 'the
plant into sappy, and spindly growth, a reaction that is particularly deleterious to young tea and
probably the quality of manufactured tea from mature hushes in plucking (Eden, 1952).
20.1. Competition between shade trees and tea bushes
The fact of competition between the shade trees and the tea bushes has to be taken into
consideration. Different authors (Carr 1970, Domros 1974, Peters 1978, Kathiravetpillai 1985) have
pointed out that shade trees compete with the tea bushes in relation to nutrients, moisture, aeration,
and light. Especially Dadaps (Erythrina lithosperma) and Acacias are characterized by a very shallow
rooting system, extending a large area in the upper soil layers. During periods of moisture stress they
definitely compete with the tea bushes, which are also characterized by a lateral root system. This
moisture and nutrient competition will have its peak in sandy or gravelly soils. Therefore both species
should not be planted as shade trees in tea fields with sandy or gravelly soil texture. An introduction
of both species is only recommended in tea growing areas, which are not characterized by frequent
droughts. In the low country massive trees of the species Albizzia moluccana quite often to be seen
as shade trees in the tea fields. It is not advisable to plant them as shade trees because of the
above-mentioned reasons. These trees are also characterized by shallow, extensive root systems,
which definitely compete with the surrounding tea bushes during the time of water stress. The root
system of Grevillea robusta and Gliricidid maculata extends to deeper soil layers than tea roots,
which means that a competition is reduced to minimum during moisture stress. They can be planted in
all planting districts and soil types.
Shade trees should be planted in a wider spacing in such estates which are located in deep N-S
valleys. In the course of a day there are only a few hours of direct sunlight around noon for all tea
fields. A heavy stand of shade trees would decrease the duration and intensity of sunlight even further.
21. Role of shade trees in reducing wind damage
An important ecological factor in relation to the growing conditions and yield potential of a tea
plant is the wind. High speed of - surface winds causes mechanical damages to the bushes, especially
38
in the case of young plants. Mature tea bushes suffer under heavy winds because the immature young
shoots ("two leaves and a bud"), which are essential for tea manufacture, are stripped off, which
causes a loss of crop. Sometimes even smaller branches break or get blown off and a defoliated bush
remains. It takes a long time for a bush to recover from such damage.
Within the tea growing area of Bangladesh a spatial variations of wind Direction and velocity
play a major role with regard to the occurrence of damage. The present study mainly concentrates
upon wind conditions, which cause mechanical damage to the tea crop. The arriving winds of
southwest monsoonal origin are forced to raise and to cool down on the western and southwestern
slopes thereby cause orographic rains. The surface winds during this period of a velocity of
60-80 km/h or even more, cause severe mechanical damages to the cultivated tea crop on the
described windward side.
21.1. Planting materials and wind damage
The arriving strong winds are able to cause damages by blowing off tea leaves, but those are
not as severe as in the tea fields of a lower bush density. Fields with a low stand of tea bushes are
patchy and provide an increased surface for the attacking winds. This results in small-scale
turbulences between the bushes whose power is highly destructive and resulting in great damages.
Therefore the patches in the low-density fields of wind-swept areas have to be in filled with
vegetation of the same height as the tea bushes. Infilling tea bushes, of course, can be done in case of
high-yielding fields, which are expected to remain productive for the next 10 or 20 years. But in fields
which are due for uprooting in the next 5-10 years, the patches can be filled in planting Guatemala
grass. This will serve many purposes, such as the reduction of-the target for arriving destructive
winds, the protection of the fully exposed soil against soil erosion, the reduction of the evaporation
rate and soil temperature during dry weather conditions. Both species are easy to establish and grow
very fast, but they tend to over-grow the neighbouring tea bushes. In such cases the grass should be
cut to the ground level during the time of non-occurrence of destructive winds.
Taking the planting material into account, the result is that 38 % of the studied seedling tea
fields are damaged by strong winds. Especially the Assam-seedling bushes with their large leaf-size
are mainly damaged. Only 19 % of the fields planted with estate clones are characterized by a loss of
crop during the period of strong blowing, which again proves the vigor and hardiness of those clones
as well as their high stand per ha. 42 % of all the studied fields exclusively planted with BTRI clones
39
are damaged by destructive winds. 63% of them are located in the up-country, 29 1-4 in the
mid-country, and 8 % in low-country elevations. In the up-country the large-sized leaves of the TRI
clones are easily blown off with increasing wind speed. Due to a frequent occurrence of strong winds
and damage the bush gets weaker and weaker and recovery takes a longer time. This means a frequent
loss of crop of tea bushes which are expected to be high-yielding, which are responsible for the
continuous decline of the productivity of Bangladesh Tea Industry. Shade trees reduce the wind
velocity and protect the tea bushes from drastic damages.
Figure 3: Wind damaged tea bush
21.2. Shade trees as shelterbelt
Shade trees can act as shelterbelt and protects the tea plantation from wind damage.
Shelterbelts are strips of vegetation consisting of a mixture of trees and shrubs with the aim of
protecting valuable lea land and crop from destructive winds. Shelterbelts, consisting of several lines
of trees and shrubs, reduce the wind velocity on both sides, which results in a decreased destruction of
the tea bushes and increases the yield of the protected fields. Their effect can be felt at 15 times the
height of the belt in the lee and at about three times the height of the belt on the windward side. A
reduction of the wind speed on both sides of a shelterbelt is combined with a minimization of wind
erosion on the soil surface. In steep areas shelterbelts with their dense vegetation act as buffer strips
intercepting surface run-off and reducing water erosion. An improvement of the micro-climate can
also be achieved by reducing the evapotranspiration rate in the neighbouring tea lands during a dry
spell. Due to the existence of such-shelterbelts the population of birds that frequent tea fields and prey
on swarming termites increases. The appearance of the landscape is improved by interrupting the
40
monotony of the tea bush carpet. The value of a shelterbelt is the higher, the more tea lands it protects.
It can be expected that the loss of productive area will be more than compensated by their benefits.
A mixture of medium to tall trees in the centre and of small trees and shrubs on the outside of
the belt is most effective. Shelterbelts have to be dense in their lower part, whereas the middle and
upper parts should be more open. A completely impermeable wind barrier is aerodynamically
disadvantageous because it would cause whirlwinds in the lee and eliminate the protective function.
Shelterbelts may consist of several rows of trees or shrubs planted at a right angle to the direction of
the prevailing winds. It is also possible to allow tea rows inbetween to grow freely. The interval
between the shelterbelts, where high wind velocities are to be expected, should be about 100 m, in
case of less severe occurrences about 200-300 m (BTRI recommendations). A shelterbelt should
consist of approximately 65 %. Shrubs and 35 % trees which should further be subdivided into about
15 % tall and 20 % medium sized trees (BTRI recommendations). Large trees are to be planted in
small clusters, small trees and shrubs in larger groups.
Figure 4: Acacia auriculiformis is used as wind break at Kamaichora Tea Estate
41
Grevillea robusta and Albizzia moluccana are suggested to be tall trees for shelterbelts. For the
medium elevated areas: Grevillea robusta, Albizzia moluccana, and Gliricidia maculata. Again, the
fact of competition between the shelterbelt trees and the tea bushes has to be taken into consideration.
Especially Albizzias Dadaps and Acacias with their very shallow rooting system should not be
integrated as windbreaks in sandy or gravelly tea fields.
22. Importance of shade trees at a glance
Drought resistance
Reduce the rate of evaporation of the soil moisture
Reduce wind velocity. Shade trees act as wind break in tea garden
Prevent the tea plant from direct sunlight and reduce the light intensity (50-60%
diffused sunlight)
Reduce the temperature of the garden
Increase nutrient by litters and leaf falls
Increase nitrogen supply in the soil
Reduce soil erosion
Provide situation for proper photosynthesis
Essential for modulating the environment of tea ecosystem
Also product fuel wood and timber for our national consumption.
23. Uses of Shade trees
Shade trees, other than providing shade to the tea gardens are also used for diverse purposes
when they are matured and harvested from the tea estates.
Furniture: A. odoratissima, A. chinensis, A. procera, Dalbergia sissoo, A. falcataria, A.
lebbeck
Panelling: A. lebbeck, A. chinensis, A. odoratissima, A. falcataria, A. Procera, Albizzia
moluccana
Agricultural implements: A. procera
Fodder: Animal feeds are in short supply in many parts of the tropics. Leaves or pods from
fodder trees are an important source of animal feed, particularly in area such as South Asia. Fodder
trees are generally either browsed by the animals directly or the fodder is cut and carried to animals,
which are confined or tethered. Trees which are used as fodder sources in tea estates management
42
include Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala, Acacia albida, Acacia senegal, A. Chinensis, A.
Lebbeck, A. Procera, Erythrina lithosperma, Cajanus cajun.
Food: Food for human consumption is often an important output from shade trees. Pods, seeds
young leaves and flowers are the most common sources of human food from NFT. Outstanding
expamples of NFT as tree foods are Sesbania grandiflora and Gliricidia sepium (flowers), Leucaena
leucocephala (young shoots, pods and seeds), and Erythrina flowers.
Timber: A. lebbeck, A. chinensis, A. procera, A. lebbeck
Charcoal: A. lebbeck, A. procera, A. falcataria
Posts, Piles: A. lebbeck, A. chinensis
Planking: A. falcataria
Pulp and paper: A. falcataria
Gum/Tannin: A. chinensis, A. lebbeck
Fuel wood: A falcataria, A. chinensis, A. lebbeck, Acacia auriculiformis, Acacia mangium,
Leucaenas, Dalbergia sissoo, Grevilliea robusta, Albizia lucida, Derris robusta.
Pulp wood: A. falcataria (excellent for fibre and particle board also used as veneer core stock
and crafting)
Matches and boxes: A. falcataria
Veneers: Dalbergia sissoo, (also used for structural works, cart wheel, railway carriage, boat,
ploughs, toys, tenis rackets, hocky sticks, musical instruments making etc) A. falcataria.
Carved articles: Dalbergia sissoo, A. falcataria
Resin: A. auriculiformis,
Fertilizer: Leguminous shades are often having the advantage of high nitrogen foliage, which
can be used as a green manure to fertilize other crops. Farmers in some areas have long recognized
that crops grow more productively under some trees than they do under others. NFT, which produce
succulent, high-nitrogen foliage and have the ability to regenerate from coppice shoots are excellent
sources of nutrients.
43
Tea chests: Bangladesh needs nearly 9 lakh of tea chests per year for exporting tea in the
foreign market. The supply of the entire quantity of chests is met by the local factories. The
“Bangladesh Standards for tea chests and plywood for tea chests 18:1978” recommend 36 species for
the manufacture of shooks and battens. Some of the species are susceptible to fungi and require
prophylactic preservative treatment with borax, boric acid or zinc chloride (Anon. 1978). Soft to
moderately hard species are required for tea chests; the figure of the wood is of least importance.
Flavour of the tea is an important consideration. The tea chests, therefore, be manufactured with wood
species free from any inherent undesirable odour and must not offer any taint to tea subsequently. A
few shade tree species can be used for making effective chests for packing tea. These are Albizzia
moluccana, Albizzia falcataria, Dalbergia sissoo etc. (Azizullah, M.A. 1982).
Figure 5: Packaging of tea in the tea chests is going on
44
24. A grief description of two important shade trees used in Bangladesh tea estates
24.1. Gliricidia Sepium As A Shade Tree
In recent years, many tea estates have witnessed deterioration in their stands of shade trees.
This has been most marked in the case of pure stands of Chakua koroi (Albizzia chinensis) which on
some gardens have been completely destroyed as a result of cankers caused mostly by the attacks of
'the Buprestid, Agrilus beesonii, but in the, sada koroi (Albizzia procera) is also dying out due to
attack by Orange Mite. The rapidity with which the existing shade trees have died has called for an
equally rapid replacement by new ones and it is for this reason that fast growing species such as
Gliricidia sepium (previously Gliricidia maculata) are being planted on an increasingly extensive
scale.
Figure 6: Gliricidia sepium which is used as temporary shade tree in the tea plantation
Gliricidia sepium was introduced into Bangladeshfrom the West Indies as an ornamental
flowering tree. It grows quickly producing long arching branches carrying abundant foliage. Leaves
45
are shed during the cold weather and the tree remains leafless until after it has flowered in
March-April.
The seed matures in May-June, but should only be collected from mature trees because the
seed set in the first few seasons is of very poor quality. Trees can be raised from seed in nurseries in
the normal manner and transplanted with a bheti in the following February-March, but excellent
results have also been obtained by putting it out as seed at stake on several estates. Alternatively,
Gilricidia sepium can readily be propagated from cuttings. The cuttings should be made from 2-year
old wood and should be ¾” -1" in diameter at the base and 5-6 ft. long. They should be set directly in
their final positions 9"-12" inch deep and made very firm. Shading is the natural canopy of the tree is
inconveniently low and the lower branches must therefore be lopped periodically. Even when a high
canopy has been formed, some thinning of the crown is needed from time to time to prevent it from
becoming too dense. The tree responds well to lopping and the mass of green material obtained is
valuable as mulch.
The use of Gliricidia sepium is not limited by soil type as it flourishes on heavy clay as well as
sandy soils. To date, the mature trees have proved free from serious pests or diseases. The scale insect
Ferrisia virgata is the most notable. A good solution is Clensel, a liquid soap, diluted to 1 in 30 parts
of water. The addition of I oz. of Dieldrex 18% E.C. per 10 gallons of spray fluid is likely to increase
the effectiveness of the application. It is important that spraying should be carried out in bright sunny
weather and a second round given if necessary.
Gliricidia sepium does not develop into a large permanent shade tree, but with systematic
lopping it .should have a useful life of up to 20 years. It can most usefully be employed by
interplanting between young permanent shade trees. Thus in permanent shade, planted 40 ft. X 40 ft.
square, a Gliricidia sepium tree should be established in the centre of each 40' X 40' square. It is
advisable to plant the trees between the rows of tea rather than to uproot a tea bush. This procedure is
equally suitable when establishing shade in young tea or replacing shade in mature tea. In both cases
the Gliricidia sepium serves the useful function of providing shade for the tea during the period when
the young permanent shade trees are largely ineffective. On tea estates in Assam, it is usual to uproot
Gliricidia sepium when the permanent shade trees have developed sufficiently. This practice contrasts
with that followed in Southern India and Ceylon where this shade tree can commonly be seen growing
beneath mature stands of Grevillea robusta or Albizzia species. In this case Gliricidia sepium is
46
retained for the value of its loppings rather than its shade. The trees are pollarded and lopped heavily
four times in a season, thus providing a mass of green manure for the tea. The trees are uprooted and
replaced by new cuttings when necessary.
25. Leucaenas as shade trees
Leucaenas are seen as ideal trees for agroforestry, shade tree in the tea plantation contributing
to overall productivity and helping to stabilize and enrich the soil fixing N2 in it.
The Spanish sailing ships of four centuries ago brought the first leucaenas from Mexico to
Asia. In the nineteenth century, leucaenas spread widely in Asia and the Pacific region, throughout
Latin America and later in Africa. They were used as shade trees for coffee and tea and became
increasingly important as a source of fuelwood because they grow back easily after coppicing. Today,
farmers grow leucaenas on an estimated 2 million hectares, in every tropical region of the world.
There are 13 species of the genus Leucaena in the great family legumes. These are native trees of the
America. The most common species is Leucanea leucocephala, the white-headed leucaena). The
'giant' leucaenas are single stemmed trees, growing up to 20 metres high and 50 centimetres in
diameter. In ideal conditions, they grow more than 10 metres in three years, reaching their maximum
height in about eight years. The wood is dense-a ‘medium hard-wood’ of 0.6 specific gravity. It works
well for carpentry, maturing to a pale brown, and can make good flooring. Burning properties are
excellent: farmers almost everywhere use leucaenas for home fuelwood. Charcoal made from leu-
caena also has good properties. Leucaena wood has-even been used on an experimental basis to fuel
large-scale electric power plants. They grow quickly during the rainy seasons and can survive long
drought. While they grow bestinareasw re annual rainfall is more than 1000 millimetres, they can
survive, once well established, with annual rainfall as low as 500 millimetres.
They can survive fire and frost’ by growing back from the undamaged crown, and can
withstand severe annual grazing. When mature trees are coppiced, they can regrow from 4 to 6 metres
in one year. Farm families often harvest them by coppicing every year. Leucaena polewood is used in
house construction and for fences. It takes preservatives well; but has low resistance to wood-boring
insects). Perhaps leucaena's most important feature is its ability to enhance soil fertility by fixing
nitrogen. Atmospheric nitrogen is converted into useful compounds in small nodules on the tree's i
outs; that are inhabited by symbiotic bacteria known as rhizobia. The tree builds these compounds
47
further into amino acids, proteins and other substances, resulting in leaves rich in nitrogen and other
minerals.
Farmers in Southeast Asia have exploited these 'living nitrogen factories' for decades by
interplanting leucaenas in their maize fields. Before the maize is planted, the trees are cut low and
branches are spread on the ground to provide leaves as fertilizer. Fodder from leucaena and other le-
gumes is rich in protein, representing the organic form of fixed nitrogen. Leucaeua can provide an
important protein supplement for ruminant livestock, such as cattle and goats. Leucaena
trees-particularly certain hybrids-can produce gum exudates that are similar to gum Arabic.The seeds
also contain a pure galactomannan gum that may have useful pharmacological properties. Leucaena
leaves are taken as medicine in some countries to settle the stomach and for other less plausible cures.
Leucaena is easily propagated, although methods vary in different parts of the world. Seeds
germinate readily. Lucaena seeds are 'hard', with a tough seedcoat that excludes water. To promote
germination, the coat can be cracked or scarified by various treatments: the simplest is to nick the seed
with a knife. One effective treatment involves pouring boiling water over the seeds and pouring it off
after three to five minutes. Following any of these treatments, the seeds can be soaked overnight,
easily revealing those fattened ones that are likely to germinate. The common leucaenas (L.
leucocephala) have small white flowers in tight clusters, with little odour. Other leucaena species
have red or yellow flowers, often with a strong odour that is attractive to bees. All leucaenas have
long thin seed pods with straight edges that hang straight down and turn brown as they ripen, which
takes about three months. The bark is thin and need not be removed for piper of rayon production.
Several less common species are-
L. diversifolia: this is a red-flowered highland tree with tiny leaflets, flowers, pods and seeds;
not weedy; good psyllid resistance
L. pallida: trees are pink-flowered with leaflets, pods and seeds like L. leucocephala; tolerant
of cold; bushy or arboreal; psyflid resistant
L. pulverulenta: this species is characterized by small white flowers on a very large tree with
grayish young leaves and tiny leaflets; it is tolerant of cold
48
L. salvadorensis: a white-flowered tall tree with small leaves; good pole wood; suitable for
lowlands.
25.1. Some information about Ipil-ipil (Leucaena leucocephala), a common leucaena, which is used as shade tree in the tea estate is given here;
Climatic Conditions: It grows best in full sunlight and in high light 'Intensities but its growth
is relatively slow when in heavy shade. The tolerable length of dry season is 5-6 months. The annual
mean temperature range from 14.7o C - 27.4o C. Frost kills it. Annual rainfall requirement is 100 -
3000 mm)
Physiographic, Edaphic and Biotic requirements: Ipil-ipil prefers neutral to
alkaline/limestone soils. It could tolerate rocky sites with little soil, although the growth is slow and
height often stunted. It grows poorly in acidic soil with pH below 5.5 and in water-logged areas where
the soil has deposits of Al, Fe, or silica). It can tolerate sandy clay loam to sandy loam soil with pH
ranging from 5.6 to 8.0. It thrives in elevation less than 700 meters above sea level.
Phenology: On areas where moisture is available, leaf shedding is very minimal. In drier
areas, however, almost complete leaf shedding occur during the hottest portions of the year. Leaf
flushing occur two weeks after the first rain.
Silvicultural Characteristics: This species is very light demanding. It grows best in full
sunlight and in high light intensities. It is one of the fastest growing trees in the tropics.
Planting in the tea gardens: This species can be established by planting nursery grown
seedlings or by directly sowing pretreated seeds in the field. It can also be grown by rooted cuttings
and grafts (Zabala, 1977). It is planted at a spacing of 6 m x 6m with tea bushes.
Silvicultural systems: This species is a very popular multi-purpose tree. Its uses are firewood,
charcoal, source of electricity, fodder, pulpwood, medicinal, posts, tannin, banana props, organic
fertilizer, soil improver, firebreaks, shade and nurse crops, ornamental, erosion control, etc.
49
26. Influence of Shade on the Incidence of Pests in Tea Plantation in Bangladesh
The use of the leguminous and few non-leguminous trees as shade for tea is common in the tea
growing areas of the world but there are some exceptions depending upon topography and
agro-climatic conditions. Tea ecosystem generally comprises tea, shade trees, green crops, forest, etc.
The intensive monoculture of a perennial crop like tea in Bangladesh over an extensive land area in
Sylhet, Chittagong and Chittagong Hill tracts has virtually formed a stable ecosystem for divergent
pests and diseases. In Bangladesh, so far 29 arthropod pests including insects and mites, 1 algal and
18 fungal disease are recorded (Sana 1983, Ali 1990). Due to their infestation over the years,
inadequate shade, poor drainage, improper intercultural practices etc., the annual crop losses is
estimated to be about 10-15% (Ali 1990))
There is some controversy over use of shade but it is fairly certain that the shade trees are
essential for modulating the environment of tea ecosystem, enriching the soil fertility, reducing
temperature and the evaporative capacity, conserve soil moisture and helps in the control of certain
pests and diseases which are positively thermo tropic in nature (Eden 1952, Barua 1989). On the
contrary, shade trees also serve as potential source of root diseases, encourages -quick germination of
disease spore, invite and harbour different insect pests as well as play a vital role for the transmission
and transmigration of pests and diseases among different components of tea ecosystem (Hasan 1963).
In spite of that the importance of shade in the plantations in Bangladesh as far as pest infestation is
concerned can not be over emphasized.
To evaluate its influence, a reconnaissance pest survey was undertaken at Baraoorah Tea
Estate where deshading was practised by the management. During the study as many as nine pests and
diseases invaded successively at different times during cropping season. It also envisaged that the
incidence of most of the pests spectrum were found comparatively higher in unshaded than shaded
area indicating direct influence of shade on pests. This study also confirms that shade in plantations
plays a certain beneficial role in regulating pests incidence. From the study, it would appear that the
seasonal incidence of Termites, Jessid, Flush worm, Macrophoma were prevalent throughout the
period and were more pronounced in the unshaded than shaded plantations due to their sun loving
habit. Activity of Termite and Macrophoma, which are considered t be recurring problem, were more
or less acute irrespective of shaded condition.
50
Helopeltis being a negatively thermo-and phototropic appeared comparatively higher in the
shaded than the unshaded condition. On the contrary, red spider mite, Red rust were seen during the
early part of the cropping season and thereafter through its incidence declined, mild to moderate
infestation of Red spider mite was prevalent during mid cropping season.
The study also reflected that the overall incidence of most pests and diseases were more or less
consistent in different quarters but their magnitudes of attack were comparatively higher in unshaded
areas. The initial attack of the recurrent pest was slight to moderate during the first quarter which
becomes dominant during the second and third quarters. Infestation of permanent pest like Termite,
Macrophoma and seasonal pest like Helopeltis and Jassid were pronounced during the fourth quarter.
This directly indicated the influence of shade on the colonization, perpetuation and succession as well
as status of pests in different ecological niches.
Of all standard control strategy, shade management no doubt plays a significant role to
minimise pest problem to a great extent. From this observation it is quite apparent that the importance
of shade cannot be over emphasized t check tea pest by providing optimum shade condition through
planting of leguminous shade species.
27. Diseases of Shade Trees
Shade is an important and' necessary component for plantations. They are however, very often
attacked by various diseases which if not controlled may result in reduction or elimination, of shade
and consequent susceptibility of the tea underneath secondary and weak parasites. Some of the shade
tree disease organisms are vigorous parasites of the tea plant itself, and if left uncontrolled may attack
the adjoining tea. In the paper an attempt has been made to put together all available information on
the occurrence, disease symptoms, host spectrum and control measures as applicable in Bangladesh.
27.1. Leaf diseases
The fungi causing leaf disease may be grouped as follows:
I) black rot, II) rusts, III) Camptomeris leaf V) spot, IV) Sooty mould and Aschersonia, V)
Cercospora leaf spot, and VI) uncommon fungi. Of these, only black rot is an important disease of
tea.
51
I) Black rot as in tea, the disease is caused by both Corticium invisum Petch and C. theas
Bernard and the symptoms produced on the hosts are almost identical. The fungi produce patches
causing a part or entire leaf/leaflet to wither away. The affected leaves/leaflets remain suspended or
attached to the stems or other leaves by means of the fungal mycelium as in tea. The fungi spread by
contact and grow rapidly in cool humid, dull wet weather during July-August. The affected leaves
drop off and transmit the disease to, tea underneath. Fortunately such cases are rare and the disease
has been recorded mostly in the nursery plants.
Host spectrum: Albizzia amara Boiv., A. Chinensts (Qsbeck) Merr., A. falcata Baker Syn A.
moluccana Miq., A. lebbek Benth. A. odoratissinta Benth., A. procera Benth,, Alfurijis sp., Erythrina
sp., Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Steud,. Indigofem teysmanii Miq. (1960).
Thorough spraying of two rounds of copper fungicide at' fortnightly interval during the
actively growing season controls the disease.
Another fungus, Pellicularia filamentosa (Pat.) Rogers produces black rot like symptoms in
Albizzia falcala; the affected branches however die back following defoliation. In cross inoculation
studies identical symptoms were recorded in Gliricidia sepium while in tea discretenecrotic spots on
older leaves were produced(4). Excision of the dead portion to clean healthy wood and 2-3 rounds of
spraying with a copper fungicide at 14, day. intervel are suggested.
II) Rusts: Species belonging to the genera Ravelelia Sphaerophragmium and Uromyces have
been observed to cause disease spots in a few hosts, during the cold season. Ravenelia clemensae
Sydow, R. sessilis Berk. on leaves of Albizzia lebbek and A. procera (Ann. Rep. 1956), and another R.
sp. on A. chinensis (1968). Sphaerophragmium acaciae (Cooke) Magn, on A. odoratissima (1967).
Uromyces achorus Sydow: This brown rust was in association with a hyperparasite Darluca filum
(Biv Bern ex Fr.) Cast. on Dalbergia sp. (Anti. Rep. 1957).
The depredation by the rusts occurs towards the ends of the season when the leaves are due for
shedding.
III) Camptomeris leaf spots are caused by two species of Camptomeris on Albizzias (5).
52
a) Camptomeris albizziae (Petch) Mason. The disease manifests itself on the undersurface of
the leaflets as numerous, black pulverulent dots, reminiscent of rust: sori. The spots on the upper
surface are ill defined,
Hosts: Albizzia amara,_A. chinensis, A.falcata, A. gam. bleli Prain (1967). A. julibrissin
Durazz, A. Iebbek, A. odoratissima, A. procera.
The host A. gamblei was recorded in 1967 the others were reported earlier (5).
b) C. albizziicola (Thirumalachar and Narasinihain), Bessey. Spots produced are not much
different fro1w those produced by C. albizziae, the difference lies in themicroscor) in details.
Hosts. : A. lebbek (5)
No treatment is called for as the infection period concides with natural leaf fall.
IV) Sooty moulds and Aschersonia are fungi growing in honeydew secretion of scale insects
and on the insect respectively.
a) Sooty moulds: Many fungi including species of Meliola growing on honey dew secretion
as a superficial layer on the upper surface present a sooty appearance on the leaf. The coating breaks
off in flakes when dry.
Sooty mould was recorded on Derris robusta Benth, (1928) imol Meliola albizziae Hansford
et Deighton on .A. odoratissima (6).
b) Aschersonia sp. parasitizes scale insects and is seen as orange to pinkish red lump3 or about
1-2 mn diameter on leaves or stem.
Hosts : A. odoratissima, Derris robusta (1932). V) Cercospora leaf spot: More than two
species are involved.
Cercospora leysmanii Barua and Barua (7) attacks leaves of Indigofera teysmanii and
produces sub-circular to irregular spots on both the surfaces of the leaflet. They are brown with
greyish centre on the upper surface and brown to olivaceous brown on the lower surface. Adjacent
spots merge to form a bigger patch and in extreme cases the lamina may be distorted. Cercospora
subsessilis N. & P. Sydow produces spots on Melia azedakaeh Linn. (Ann. Rep. 1957) while an
53
undetermined species of Cercospora is recorded on Erythrina indica Lam (1957). Chemotherapy is
not advocated and none of the above Cercospora are found to parasitise on tea.
VI) Uncommon fungi: Some fungi are found to cause localised spots on certain species of shade trees
on few occasions. They are listed hereunder:
a) Periconia sp. on Erythrina indica (1957) and on indigofera teysmanii associated with
blackening of inflorescence axis (Ann. Rep. 1962).
b) Epicoccum sp. on Erythrina indica (1957).
c) Phyllochorca dalbergiae Niessl causing tar spots on -Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. (8).
d) Stigmella sp. on Erythrina indica (1957).
e) Stigmina sp. on Derris robusta (1956).
f) Phyllostica sp. on Erythrina indica (1957).
g) Stigmochora albizziae (Syd.) Arx on Albizzia odoratissima (1974).
27.2. Stem diseases
The diseases so far recorded are
I) Red rust, II) Nectria, III) Pink disease, IV) Macrophoma theicola, V) Phomopsis sp., VI)
Auricularia auricula, VII) Hypoxylon spp. and VIII) Uncommon fungi.
I) Red rust: This algal disease is of common occurrence in almost all the shade tree species
but the degree of incidence varies from species to species-Albizzia chinensis being the worst affected.
In badly attacked plants, the affected branches die back and always bear patches of orange-red
fructifications of red rust during April-July.
Hosts: Acacia lenticularis Buch-Ham. Adenanthere pavanina Linn. Albizzia amara (Ann. Rep.
1962), A. chinensis, A. gummifera J. F. Gmel (Ann. Rep. 1962), A. julibrissin (1960), A. lebbek, A.
lucida Benth (Ann. Rep. 1965), A. odoratissima, A. procera, A. sumatrana, Dalbergia assamica
Benth, Derris robusta, Gliricidia sepium, Indigofera dosua Buch-Ham, I. teysmanii, Melia azedarach,
Milletia dura Dunn (Ann. Rep. 1962), Parkia javonica.
As in tea, copper fungicides are effective in controlling the disease. Besides, improvement in
drainage and nutrient status of the soil reduces the disease.
54
Physolinum monile (De Willd) Printz is an epiphytic alga growing on shade tree trunks, often
confused with the red rust alga Cephaleuros parasiticus Karst.
II) Nectria spp. More than two species of this genus have been found to occur as wound
parasites of shade trees. They usually cause local infection but, at times, branches may die-back from
the seat of infection. They may be covered by white to pinkish soft cushions of the imperfect stage
and/or small globular, cinnabar to crimson red bodies of the perfect stage of the fungus. Tunstall (9).
has recorded how Nectria spread onto the tea in the direction of the wind from affected, Erythrina
plants. Their host spectra are recorded as follows:
N. haematococca Berk. et Br. on A. falcata (1957), A. odoratissima (1960), A. procera (1959),
Derris robusta (1958), Erythrina sp. (1919).
N. cinnabarina (Tode ex Fr.) Fr. on A. procera (1932) Dalbergia assamica (1933).
Nectria sp. on Albizzia falcata (1915), A. procera (Ann. Rep. 1956), Derris robusta (1925),
Indigofera dosua (1917) on roots and I. loava (1917).
Affected branches should be cut to clean healthy wood and sprayed with a copper fungicide.
Tea in such areas should be pruned between mid November and December. In case of hail damage
such tea areas should be thoroughly sprayed within 24 hours of the damage.
III) Pink disease (Corticium Salmonicolor Berk. & Br. Pellicularia salmonicolor (Berk. et
Br.) Dastur. It can be recognized as a thin film of silky white mycelium on the affected part of the
stem. The infection presumably occurs through the lenticels and leaf scars during the rainy season.
The fungus at first produces small whitish patches which later on increase in diameter assuming a pale
pink colour and gradually girdle the stem(4), though usually the trust is formed on the, shaded side of
the stem. The disease is known to attack young tea plants on rare occasions (3).
Hosts : A. falcata (Ann. Rep. 1961), Derris robusta (1926), Gliricidia sepium (1965).
The affected part should be cut to clean healthy wood and the plants be sprayed with a copper
fungicide.
55
IV) Macrophoma theicola Petch: The fungus causes branch die-back. Diseased patches on
the branches are noticeable as slightly sunken, usually longitudinal lesions, edged by a ring of callus
growth. The patches bear tiny, black, fruit bodies of the fungus during the rains. It also attacks tea.
The fungus is considered secondary to drought and sun-scroch damage and hence cutting out
of the affected portion to clean healthy wood is sufficient.
Hosts: A. falcata, A. odoratissima, A. procera, Dalbergia assamica and Milletia dura.
V) Phomopsis sp.: The fungus is found to cause branch die-back in few instances. The
affected region becomes sunken and turns grayish black or dark purple and becomes dotted with
minute pycnidial structures. Sometimes the wood tissue becomes permeated by bluish black lines. P.
theae attacking tea is different from the one known in shade, the latter in some instances has been
found to be associated with Valsa, Valsella and Eutypella (Ann. Rep. 1962) and also Phoma (Ann.
Rep. 1961).
Hosts: A. falcata (1932), A. richardiana king and Prain (Ann. Rep. 1957), Derris robusta
(1968), Gliricidia sepium (1957).
The dead portion is to be cut to clean healthy-wood.
VI) Auricularia auricular (Hooke) Underwood. The fungus attacks through wounds on
branches. It has also been recorded in tea as weak wound parasite of rare occurance (3). The disease
can be recognized by the soft, flesh coloured, gelatinous human ear-like structures borne on the
branches during rains.
Hosts: Albizzia procera (1929), Derris robusta (1926), Gliricidia sepium (Ann. Rep. 1957).
Diseased branches should be lopped to clean healthy wood.
VII) Hypoxylon spp.: Four distinct species of the genus including the one causing Tarry root
rot in the tea have been recorded in shade tree branches and discussed by Agnihothrudu (10). The
fungi produce spores in flattened, hard, almost black encrustations, the upper surface of which is
smooth, and even, resembling dried black paint.
56
a) H. stygium (Lev.) Sacc. When young the spore bearing stroma is a thin reddish brown layer,
later on this turns red and with the production of perithecia deep purplish black. It is very often
found on Gliricidia sepium.
b) H. bovei Speg. (Var microspora ?) Miller. Here stroma is restricted or rarely somewhat flat
with abrupt margin. It has been recorded on two undetermined twigs of Albizzia spp.
c) H. truncatum (Schw. ex Fr.) Miller. When young the stroma is greenish, and then it gradually
turns brown becoming black with development of perithecia. Stroma 2-3 mm thick with
perithecial projections. The fungus is recorded from one dead branch of Albizzia sp.
d) H. nummularium Bull. ex. Fr. var merillii (Bres.) Miller. The fungus causing Tarry root rot of
tea, II. asarcodes (Theiss) Mill. is considered as its synonym. Agnihothrudu (II) considers H.
asarcodes as a stem parasite. The stroma in shade tree is exposed, flat, deep purplish to almost
black and typically sub convex.
The disease has been almost confined to the tea growing areas of West Bengal.
Host: A. procera.
Cutting out of the affected parts is considered sufficient except in the case of the case of the
last named species where care should be exercised not to spread the diseased material on to the tea
underneath.
VII) Uncommon fungi: Some fungi have been recorded in some shade tree species on
isolated occasions. They are as follows:
a) Kutilakesopsis macalpinae Agnihothrudu et GCS Barua (12) is isolated from stem pieces
of A. richardiana. The fungus produces cushion shaped esslle sporodochia at first white,
then turning pale olive green with age. An identical fungus was also recorded on dead
twigs of A. procera in 1956.
b) Haplosporella aleuritis Agmojptjrudu, Hadfield (13) is reported from dead snags and bark
of Aearitis Montana Wilson as possibly responsible for the die back.
57
c) Exosporium assamicum Agnihothrudu (14). The fungus is recorded from dead branches of
Albizzia chinensis.
d) Sporidesmium tropicale M.B. Ellis. This dematiaceous hyphomycete is very common on
dead twigs of shade trees particularly those of A. chinensis (14).
e) Daldnia concentrica (Bolt. ex Fr.) Ces. & de Not. is recorded on dead twigs of Derris
robusta (Ann. Rep. 1957).
f) Cytospora sp. on Albizzia richardiana (Ann. Rep. 1957).
27.3. Root diseases
Some shade trees are killed in the nursery by- I) Pythium sp. II) Fusarium sp. III) Rhizoctonia
sp. and IV) bacterial wilt while in the field condition after being planted out many are attacked by V)
primary root disease VI) secondary root disease and VII) uncommon diseases. They are discussed
hereunder.
I) Pythium sp. The fungus causes ‘damping off’ in very young plants during rains when the
diseased plant suddenly dies out during a period of hot dry weather following wet spells. The bark of
the affected root decays and peels off easily, specially at the collar region below the soil surface.
Hosts: Albizzia procera (1946), A. sumatrana (1957). To avoid this particular fungus crust
formation in nursery beds in heavy soil should be avoided. Cheshunt compound or a copper fungicide
is advised to treat the survivors after removing the dead ones.
II) Fusarium sp. It attacks during the rainy season when the collar region along with the
surface roots become covered with a thin, white fungal growth. In many cases tissues inside turn
black.
Hosts: A. chinensis (1948), A. falcata (Ann. Rep. 1956), A. richardiana (Ann. Rep. 1960),
Derris robusta (1929), Gliricidia sepium (Ann. Rep. 1956), I. teysmanii (Ann. Rep. 1963) and on D.
robusta (1934) as Fusarium udum Butler.
III) Rhizoctonia sp. Two species have been recorded. The collar region is the worst affected.
It becomes covered with white fungal mycelium browning slightly with age. Sometimes sclerotia are
also recorded.
58
Rhizoctonia solani Kühn is found to kill. A. odoratissima (Ann. Rep. 1960) and I. teysmanii
(Ann. Rep. 1963) seedlings whereas one undetermined species of Rhizoctonia killed seedlings of A.
richardiana (Ann. Rep. 1960).
IV) Bacterial wilt: This is recorded in Gliricidia sepium seedlings (1955) in the nurscries.
The affected collar region presents a water soaked appearance. In the case of the above three diseases,
the affected plants are to be pulled out together with a couple of unaffected ones from either side and
destroyed. Planting of susceptible trees are to be avoided.
V) Primary root diseases: They can directly attack and kill a shade tree and sometimes its
surrounding tea bushes in such a way that it would appear to have been killed by lighting. In
lightening however the accompanying dead tea bushes would always be more than nine in number. A
part or the whole of a tree may die suddenly. The primary root diseases of tea attacking shade trees
are:
a) Charcoal stump rot, b) Brown root rot, c) Black root rot, d) Purple root rot and e) Tarry root
rot.
a) Charcoal stump rot: Ustulina zonata (Lev.) Sacc. = U. deusta (Fr.) Petrak. The disease
produces at the collar region, characteristic wavy incrustation which is white at first, turning grey and
finally charcoal black; in course of about two weeks time it becomes hard and brittle. Silky fan-like
mycelium abounds on the surface of the wood and can be seen when the bark of a diseased root is
removed. The root tissues become permeated by irregular black lines or bands.
Hosts: Albizzia chinensis, A. falcate, A. odoratissima, A. procera, Aleuritis montana, Derris
robusta.
b) Brown root rot: Fomes lamaoensis (Murr.) Sacc. and Trott. = F. noxius Corner. The
diseased root is characterized by an encrustation of soil, sand and stone particles held together by
brown mycelium. The root surface may be interspersed by cushions of brown mycelia. The affected
roots bear brown lines or reticulations.
Hosts: Albizzia chinensis, A. odoratissima, A. procera, Dalbergia sissoo, Derris robusta,
Erythina spp. and Melia azedarach.
59
Black root rot: Rosellinia arcuata Petch and R. bunodes: (Berk & Br.) Sacc. The affected
plants some times bear wooly, purplish grey to black stocking of mycelium at the collar region going
up the stem. On the root surface black, irregular, cob webby mycelial cords and black isolated spots
are seen. On removing the bark small white to black star like markings are seen with black dots and
dashes, the last two are also seen when a cut is made into the wood. Perithecia are seen produced as
almost black spherical bodies at the collar region.
Hosts: A. procera, Erythina sp. and Indigofera dostia.
d) Purple root rot: Helicobasidium compactum Boedijn: The disease develops its
fructification as a thick velvety mycelial pad at the soil level often girdling the whole stem for several
centimeters. The colour of the growth is purplish to state chocolate while that of the affected wood is
pinkish.
Hosts: A. chinensis, A. odoratissima (Ann. Rep. 1965), A. procera, Gliricidia sepium (Ann.
Rep. 1965).
e) Tarry root rot: It attacks A. procera and has been discussed under stem diseases (VII d)
Meticulous removal of all the dead roots from the soil is the most common method advocated
in dealing with primary root diseases. Tunstall (15) records an outbreak of brown root rot in tea traced
to a piece of Mesua ferrea root lying buried at 120 cm. depths for at least fourteen years. Ring barking
(16) is recommended to avoid storage promote depletion of starch in the roots of trees due for felling.
Lightening affected tree is to be removed at the earliest as it is likely to be attacked by Charcoal stump
rot.
VI) Secondary root disease: It is caused by a soil fungus Sphaerostilbe repens B. and Br.
which can attack only when the health of the plant is impaired by water logging or impeded aeration
of the soil. The roots turn violet to inky black in colour. On removal of the root bark or sometimes on
the soil adhering to the root surface, characteristic strands of mycelia are noticeable. They are usually
flat, 1-2 mm broad and white at first then turning orange to purplish black with age.
Hosts: A. chinensis, A. falcata, A. odoratissima, A. procera, Derris robusta, Erythrina sp. and
Gliricidia sepium.
60
As in tea, improvement of soil aeration by proper drainage is necessary. Plants like A. falcata,
A. procera and Gliricidia sepium may be killed by waterlogging alone even in absence of the fiungal
element. In one instance waterlogging restricted root development in A. odoratissima to such an
extent that they were easily blown down by storm.
VII) Uncommon diseases: Some diseases of occasional occurrence are here:
a) Ganoderma spp: Two species of Ganoderma have been recorded on shade trees. The
fructification usually appears on the affects trunk or stumps.
i) G. lucidum (Leys ex Fr.) Karst = Fomes lucidus (Leys) Fr. The fructification develops as a
thick bracket the upper surface of which is smooth, yellowish to deep red in colour and concentrically
zonated while the under surface is white in colour.
Hosts: A. chinensis (1919), A. odoratissima (Ann. Rep. 1957).
ii) G. applanatum (Pers ex. Wallr.) Pat = F. applanatus pers ex Wallr.) Gill.
Compared to G. lucidum the bracket in this case is larger in size and thick, hard and dull. The
upper surface is marked with grey and brown concentric zonations while the undersurface is dull
white. The disease was first noticed on A. chinensis in 1934. Ganoderma affected plants may be cut
off to clean healthy wood or uprooted if necessary.
b) Aglaospora sp. was recorded on roots of Albizzia falcataria in the year 1938. Since no
material is available it is not possible to say if it is Tunstallia aculeata Agnihothrudo. Infection in tea
is known through wounds on the above ground portion and thence to roots and is not known to spread
by root contract or through soils.
c) Hattiali disease: Affected plants look sickly and may die out after some time. The roots
bear typical pock marks on the surface.
Hosts: A. chinensis (Ann. Rep. 1960) and Dalbergia sissoo (1948).
61
28. Catalogue of Pests on Shade Trees and Ancillary Crops
The use of shade trees in tea cultivation and green crops in the management of young tea and
fallow land is a well established practice. Pest Management has a very important role in the
silviculture of these plants. The bio-ecology and control of some of the major pests of shade trees and
green crops have been reported and a review of reports on the biology of major shade tree pests was
made by Kakoty. In view of the importance of shade trees and green crops a catalogue of pests has
been presented below. Out of the 147 species recorded so far, beetles rank the highest with 65 species,
moths and butterflies have 40 species, followed by 34 species of bugs, six species of mites and one
species each of termite and nematode. (Gope and Das.1988)
Table 4. Pests of shade trees and ancillary crops
Order Family Species Host Site of
infestation
1 2 3 4 5
Insect Buprestidae Sternocera aurosignata
Thompson
Albizzia odoratissima
Albizzia lebbek
Albizzia procera
Albizzia chinensis
Root
Buprestidae Agrilus beesoni
Oben berger
A. odoratissima
A. procera
A. chinensis
Albizzia lucida
Bark
Buprestidae Agrilus sp. near
A. babaulti Theory
A. lucida Bark
Buprestidae Catoxantha bonvoulloirvi
Deyr.
A. odoratissima Bark
Curculionidae Apoderus dentipes Fst. A. lebbek
Leaf
Curculionidae Apion (=Conapion) sp Tephrosia candida
Priotropis cytisoides
leaf
Curculionidae Cryptorrhynchus sp A. chinensis Bark and soft
wood
Curculionidae Colobodes sp Derris robusta Bark and soft
62
Order Family Species Host Site of
infestation
1 2 3 4 5
wood
Curculionidae Myllocerus
undecimpustulatus Faust
A. lebbek, A.
chinensis
Leaf
Curculionidae Deiradolcus moratus
(Faust)
A. lebbek
A. maranguensis
Indigofera teysmanni
Cerambycidae Xystrocera festiva Thom. A. procera,
A. chinensis,
A. moluccana
A. odoratissima
Heart wood of
trunk
Cerambycidae X. globosa (Olivier) A. maranguensis Heart wood of
trunk
Cerambycidae X. globosa (olivier) A. maranguensis Heart wood of
trunk
Cerambycidae Ropica sp A.odoratissima Heart wood of
trunk
Bruchidae Bruchidius sp T. candida Pod
Histeridae Terelriosoma sp A. odoratissima Soft wood of
trunk
Endomychidae Indalmus kirbyanus Latr. C. anagyroides leaf
Anthribidae Phloeophilus agrestis
Boheman
A. odoratissima Soft wood of
trunk
Tenebrionidae Conocephalum oblongum
(F)
A. odoratissima
Bark
Tenebrionidae Encyalesthus sp A. lebbek
A. maranguensis
Bark
Tenebrionidae Lyphia indicola Geb A. odoratissima Bark
Tenebrionidae Amarygmus cuprarius
(Weber)
A. maranguensis Bark
Lagriidae Lagria ventralis Reitter A. odoratissima Leaf
Lagriidae Aulonogria lemoides I. teysmanni Leaf
63
Order Family Species Host Site of
infestation
1 2 3 4 5
(Fairmaire)
Carabidae Coptodera sp A. moluccana Bark
Carabidae Holcoderus alacer
Andrews
A. moluccana Bark
Monommidae Monomma? glyphysternum
(Marseul)
A. moluccana Stem
Sagriidae Sagara purpurea Licht. C. anagyroides Leaf
Lepidoptera Noctuidae Rhesala meoestalis Walk. A. odoratissima
A. lebbek, A. procera
Leaf
Noctuidae R. impartata A. odoratissima Leaf
Noctuidae Ophiusa sp. A. odoratissima
A. procera
Leaf
Leaf
Noctuidae Hyperaeschea pallida
(Butl.)
C. anagyroides Leaf
Noctuidae Pericyma cruegeri Acacia lenticularis Leaf
Noctuidae P. umbrina Guenee A. lenticularis Leaf
Noctuidae P. detersa Walk Sesbania aegyptica Leaf
Noctuidae Selepa celtis Moore A. maranguensis Leaf
Pieridae Erema hecabae L A. odoratissima, A.
procera, A.
fraxinifolius
Leaf
Pieridae E. blanda silhetana Wallace A. fraxinifolius Leaf
Pieridae Catopsilia crocale Cr. C. fistula, C. siamea Leaf
Lycaenidae Surendra quercetorum
Moore
A. odoratissima Leaf
Lycaenidae Lampides boeticus L C. anagyroides, C.
usarmoensis
Leaf & pod
Lycaenidae Maruca testulalis T. candida Pod
Notodontidae Phalera raya Moore A. lebbek, D. robusta Leaf
Notodontidae P. grotei Moore A. lebbek, D. robusta Leaf
64
Order Family Species Host Site of
infestation
1 2 3 4 5
Notodontidae Boradessa omissa Roth. D. robusta, C. siamea Leaf
Lasiocampidae Cosmotrichia laeta Wlk A. odoratissima, D.
robusta,
Leaf
Geometridae Buzura (Biston)
D. robusta, I.
teysmanni
Leaf
Geometridae suppressaria Guen A. odoratissima, A.
chinensis, P.
cytisoides, Dalbergia
assamica
Leaf
Geometridae Semiothisa sp?
mayandaria Walk
Mimosa invisa Leaf
Arctiidae Diacrisia obliqua Wlk I. teysmanni Leaf
Arctiidae Argina cribraria Cl. C. grahamiana Leaf
Arctiidae A. argus Koll C. grahamiana Leaf
Arctiidae Chionaema peregrina Wlk D. robusta Leaf
Arctiidae Macotasa orientalis
Hampson or close
A. moluccana Leaf
Indarbelidae Indarbela quadrinotata
Walk
A. odoratissima, A.
procera, A. lebbek, A.
chinensis, A.
lenticularis
Bark
Hyperidae Harita nebulosa Moore I. teysmanni Leaf
Gelechiidae Dichomeris ianthes Meyr. I. teysmanni Leaf
Lyonetiidae Leucoptera sp. A. lebbek Leaf
Pyrallidae Etiella zinckenella Tr. C. anagyroides Pod
Pyrallidae ? Oligochroa sp A. moluccana, A.
procera
Pyrallidae Lamprosema paeonalis Wlk D. robusta Leaf
Pyrallidae L. diemenalis Gn. T. candida Leaf
Momphidae Ascalenia sp nr.
liparophanes Meyr.
A. odoratissima Leaf
65
Order Family Species Host Site of
infestation
1 2 3 4 5
Nymphallidae Polyura arja Feld
P. athamus Drury
Charaxes fabius (Fabr.)
A. odoratissima Leaf
Cosmopterigidae Limnaecia sp?
auximona Meyrick
A. lebbek Leaf
Tincidae Dasyses rugosella
Stainton
D. robusta Bark
Tortricidae Cacoccia sp. T. candida Leaf
Hemiptera Psyllidae Psylla oblonga Mathur A. odoratissima, A.
procera, A. lebbek
Leaf
Membracidae Oxyrachis tarandus Fabr. A. odoratissima, A.
procera, A. chinensis,
A. lebbek, A.
fraxinifolius, C.
fistula
Tender stem
Membracidae Centrotypes securis Bicket A. odoratissima Tender stem
Coccidae Coccus elongatus (Sign.) A. odoratissima, A.
lebbek, A. procera
Tender stem
Coccidae Drosicha sp. A. odoratissima, A.
procera, A. chinensis
Tender stem
Coccidae Ceroplastodes chiton
(Green)
A. procera, C.
anagyroides
Tender stem
Coccidae C. cajani Maskell C. anagyroides Tender stem
Diaspididae Pinnaspis strachani (Colley) A. odoratissima Tender stem
Diaspididae Pseudaonidia duplex Ckll A. odoratissima Tender stem
Diaspididae Hemberlesia lataniae (Sign.) A. lebbek, A. procera Tender stem
Diaspididae Lepidosaphes sp. C. anagyroides Tender stem
Diaspididae Pseudaulacaspis pentagona
(Targioni)
P. cytisoides, A.
odoratissima
Tender stem
Pscudococcidae Perissopneumon sp. A. odoratissima, A.
procera
Tender stem
66
Order Family Species Host Site of
infestation
1 2 3 4 5
Pscudococcidae Ferrisiana rirgata (Ckll) A. lebbek, C.
anagyroides
Tender stem
Pscudococcidae Rastrococcus iceryoides
(Green)
A. procera, D.
robusta
Tender stem
Pscudococcidae Crisicoccus sp.
Nipaecoccus vastator
(Maskell)
A. chinensis
T. candida
Tender stem
Stem
Asterolecanidae Asterolecanium sp. T. candida Stem
Plastaspidae Coptosoma sp. T. candida, P.
cytisoides,
Desmodium gyroides,
C. grahamiana, C.
anagyroides
Stem
67
29. Problems of shade tree management in Bangladesh
The following problems of shade tree management generally exist in Bangladesh:
1. A large number of leguminous or non-leguminous trees are recommended for using as
permanent shade trees to provide shade over tea plantation. But in Bangladesh the shade tree
diversity is limited. Only a few species like A. oderaatissima, A. lebbeck, A. procera,
Leucaena leucocephala, A. chinensis, are used extensively. No trial for other species, which
could be used as shade trees, was made. If that could be done biodiversity would be enriched.
2. Few shade trees like A. moluccana are still used extensively; but there are shallow rooted
plants and competes with the tea crop for nutrient and moisture; thus reduces tea production.
3. The climatic and soil condition in Bangladesh is marginal for growing of tea and shade tree.
4. Tea estates in Bangladesh are mostly owned by private companies, that’s why research
recommendations of BTRI scientists regarding different management aspects of tea and shade
trees are not always implemented.
5. Mangers who have been recruited in the tea gardens are not technical persons in most of the
cases and lack in expertise of the proper management of shade trees and tea crop. In many
cases they even know nothing how to manage a tea ecosystem. They just manage the ‘colies’.
Proper silvicultural techniques of shade trees and tea crop are even unknown to them.
6. In many cases matching of species with the site is wrong, as a result shade trees do not thrive
well even fail
7. Sometimes proper spacing of shade trees after thinning is not maintained. Some trees die, but
the gap is not filled again. As a result an even canopy of shade trees is not found over the tea
plantation. In some patches, tea plants get lower amount of sunlight than necessary, while
other patches are flooded with sun which is detrimental for tea growth.
8. In many tea estates proper tea, shade tree, ancillary combination is not maintained. Then
layout recommended by tea scientists are not followed rather they are planted in general way.
9. Proper planting technique is not followed.
10. Number of shade trees per hectare of estates is less or more than the optimum, as a result yield
decreases.
68
11. Lopping of shade trees are not done at right time following right procedure, when the
permanent shade trees are grown height, lapping becomes problematic. Mechanical damage to
the tea plantation is done due to the falling of lops and tops of shade trees.
12. During thinning of shade trees damages to the tea plantation is done.
13. As a result of uprooting of shade trees, the topsoil is exposed to the direct hit of the raindrops,
thus enhances soil erosion.
14. Sometimes shade trees enhance the chance of post attack to the tea plants. Lops and tops of
shade trees left in the upper soil during lopping, thinning and mulching harbour various insects
and fungus.
15. The labourers engaged to carry out silvicultural operations of shade trees are not trained to the
right procedure of action.
16. Once a tree has been felled, it is advisable not to allow a stump to remain above soil level. It
should be cut to a point below soil level and covered with earth. But in many cases this is not
done. As a result posts get good harbouring place in the rotten stump.
17. Planting materials are sometimes prone to wind damage for not providing proper shade trees
and shelterbelt to protect them form destruction of strong wind prior they are planted.
18. Litter and Mulches, which are provided from the cutting of shade trees, are often washed to
the valley from the slopes due to rum-off. As a result upper hill slopes get less nutrient then
lower slopes or vallies.
69
30. RECOMMENDATION
For better management of tea plans and shade trees and to increase quality and yield of tea and
shade tree, the following recommendation are suggested-
1. Deep-rooted leguminous trees should be selected as shade trees for using in the tea estates.
Shallow rooted trees like A. moluccana should be discarded as they compete with the rain crop
tea for nutrients.
2. Shade trees should be leguminous providing higher litter fail and fixes N2 to the soil.
3. A wide variety of trees should be tried instead of a few commonly used ones to increase
biodiversity. This would harbour various birds and other wild lives and would contribute to the
maintenance of environmental balance. Acacia auriculiformis, Acacia mangium, Dalbergia
sissoo, etc. fast growing species should be planted as shade trees along with commonly used
species which would provide demand of fuel wood to the local community tea laborers.
Figure 7: Acacia auriculiformis used as shade tree at Rasidpur Tea Estate
4. Research recommendations of BTRI scientists regarding various aspects of shade tree and tea
management should be properly implemented. Private companies must be liberal towards the
innovations recommended by the tea scientists.
5. For proper management of tea estates, professional Forester should be appointed. Trained
manpower for tea gardens management is generated by Institute of Forestry and
70
Environmental Sciences, Chittagong University on regular basis. They should be recruited in
the tea estates for better management.
6. The labourers should be given training of the proper method of silvicultural operation of
shade trees like lopping, uprooting, planting, pruning, thinning, fertilizing etc to increase
productivity.
7. Right species should be selected for right soil and climatic characteristics. Matching of species
with site is important for a successful tea plantation.
8. Proper spacing and planting technique should be maintained throughout the plantation.
9. An optimum number of shade trees per hectare should be retained in the tea estates which
would allow required amount of sunshine (50-70%) break through the canopy for optimum
growth of tea plants.
10. Lopping and thinning of shade trees should be done at the right time following right procedure
when the shade is heavy. Care should be taken so that tea crop is not damaged much.
11. Once a shade has been felled he stump should be covered with soil otherwise when it rotten
allows harbouring of insects and fungus, which may infect tea crop.
12. Present tea soil is extremely degraded and exhausted, strongly acidic with less quantity of
organic matter and other essential plant food elements. Thus future policy must be designed to
accelerated to improved and management of the soil as to obtain maximum productivity and
maintain fertility of the soil by planting right type of shade trees, available green corps and
cover crops.
13. Cultural operation such as weeding, vacancy filing, maturing, pruning, tipping and plucking
should be done properly, which influences the growth and quality of tea.
14. Shade tree is a very much profitable cash crops; adequate shade trees of suitable species
should be planted in the estate. Shade tree is not provide only shade it also product fuel wood
and timber to meet the present need.
71
31.CONCLUSION
Bangladesh produces tea in marginal climatic and soil condition. The yield and quality of tea
in our country is lower than many other tea-producing countries of South Asia like India and Sri
Lanka. To increase yield and quality of produced tea, proper selection and judicious manipulation of
shade trees are very much important. An improper combination of shade tree, tea plant and ancillary
crop even may lead to failure of the plantation. The importance of shade trees in tea plantation is
crucial. Right type of shade trees should be chosen for right soil and climatic condition. A good
management of shade trees should be ensured. Professionals, who have expertise and good knowledge
in the related field like forestry graduates, should be recruited in the tea estates for their better
management to increase yield of tea. BTRI recommendations regarding shade tree management
should be implemented practically in the filed.
72
REFERENCES
Ali, M.A. 1990. Pest spectrum of Bangladesh Tea & its management. The Assam Review and Tea
News, 79(7): 19-20 (continued in subsequent Issues).
Ali, M.A. 1990. Pest spectrum of Bangladesh Tea and its management. Proc. Tea Res. Global
Perspective (TRA), India. pp. 112-118.
Ali, M.M. and M. Faizullah, 1973. Tea culture: Planting. Tea Journal of Bangladesh. 8(1). pp. 10-16.
Amin, R. K. 2003. Cha Shilpe Bangladesh. (Bengali) Dainik Azadi, 11 September.
Ann. Rep. Pest management Div., BTRI. 1981-1987.
Anonnymous, 1989. Personal communications to the office of the Secretary, Bangladeshiyo cha
sangsad. Agrabad, Chittagong.
Anon, 2003. Cha Bagane Vezosho Udvid Chaser Parikolpana. Daily Inqilab; 27 July.
Azizullah, M. A. 1982. Fast growing Species Recommended For the Commercial Plywood and Tea
chests. Proceedings of the Second National Forestry Conference Bangladesh, pp. 398.
Banerjee, B. 1969. Shade and in manurial experiment at Murmaria: a report on the incidence of
mites. Two Bud.,16: 93-96.
Barua, D. N. 1961. Effect of shade and shade trees. Two Bud., 8: 4 -12.
Barua, D. N. 1960. Soil fertility and illumination response of tea bushes. Rep. Tocklai Experimental
Station, 1959: 64-68.
Barua, D. N. 1970. Light as a factor in metabolism of the tea plant. In: Physiology of the Tree Corps
(Eds. L.C. Luckwill and C.V. Cutting), Academic. Press, London, 307-322.
Barua, D. N. and K. N. Dutta, 1961. Root growth of cultivated tea in the presence of shade trees and
nitrogenous manure Emp. J. Exp. Agric., 29: 287-298.
Barua, D.N. 1989. Science and Practice in Tea Culture, TRA. pp 401-430.
73
Barua, G. C. S. 1978. Disease of Shade Trees in North East India. TWO AND A BUD 25 (2) pp. 79-
84.
Buckingham, J. 1885. Papers regarding the Sau Tree and it remarkable influence on the tea bush.
Indian Tea Association, Calcutta.
Chaudhury, S.H. and, G. Kibria, 1977. Relationship between soil reaction and the growth of shade
trees used in tea gardens. Effect of liming and pH on the growth of Albizia chinensis
(stipulate) shade tree. Tea Journal of Bangladesh 13(1&2), pp. 3-9.
Child, R. 1961. Problems of shade in Tea. TRIE Afr., Pamphl., 19: 24-29.
Cooper, H.R. 1946. Nitrogen supply to tea. Indian Tea Association 153.
Danthanaryana, W. and D. J. W. Ranaweera, 1972. The effect of rainfall and shade on the occurrence
of three mite pests of tea in Ceylon. Ann. Appl. Biol., 70: 1-12.
Das, G. M. 1961. Studies on the effect of shade and manure on the incidence of red spider. Rep.
Tocklai Exp. Station., 196: 111-112.
De Weille, J. 1959. The adaptation of tea cultivation to the occurrence of blister blight. Arch. Tea
Cult., 20: 161-192.
Dutta, S. K. 1960. The tea bush and long-term agricultural operations. Two Bud., 7: 8-11.
Dutta, S. K. and S. Basu, 1955. Reduced light intensity and nitrogenous manures. Tea Trade and
Industry July 1955.
Eden, T. 1952. The use and abuse of shade trees in Tea Res. Inst. of East Africa, Pamphlet No-2, pp.
2-7.
Evans, G. C. 1956. An area survey method of investigating the distribution of light intensity in
woodlands with particular reference to sunflecks. J. Ecol. 44: 391 28.
F. A. O. 1987/15. NITROGEN FIXING TREES. REGIONAL OFFICE FOR ASIA AND THE
PACIFIC (RAPA). FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANISATION OF THE
UNITED NATIONS BANGKOK, PP. 61-70
74
Goodchild, N. A. and C. B. Foster-Bartham, 1958. Agricultural Department. Rep. TRIE Af r., 1957:
17-28.
Gope, B and S. C. Das, 1988. Catalogue of pests on shade and Ancillary crops. TWO AND A
BUD, 35 (1 & 2), pp. 29-34.
Gray, 0.1.1957. Gliricidia Sepium As A Shade Tree. TWO AND A BUD, 4(3).
Grice, W. J. 1957. ALBIZZIA MOLUCCANA. TWO AND A BUD, 4(3), pp. 6-7
Hadfield, W. 1968, Leaf temperature, leaf pose and productivity of the tea bush. Nature, 219: 282
-284.
Hadfield, W. 1974a Shade in north- east Indian Tea Plantations I. The Shade Pattern. J. Appl. Ecol.,
11: 151-178.
Hadfield, W. 1974b. Shade in north-east Indian Tea Plantations 11. Foliar Illumination and Canopy
characteristics. J. Appl. Ecol., 11: 177-199.
Hadfield, W. 1976. The effect of high temperatures on some aspects of physiology and cultivation of
tea bush Camellia sinensis in north-east India. In Light as an ecological factor (eds.
G.C. Evans, R. Bainbridge and O. Rockhan), 477-495.
Fuchs, H . J. 1988. Tea Environments and Yield in Sri Lanka. pp. 130-147.
Hasan, K.A. 1963. Shade trees for tea. Part-I: Their functions and behaviour. Tea J. Bangladesh 1(2):
9-16.
Hasan, K.A. and S.H. Chaudhury, 1964. Relationship between soil reaction and growth of shade
trees used in tea gardens. Efect of pH on the growth of Derris robusta Benth. Tea
Journal of Pakistan, 2(2), pp. 4-10
.Kibria, A.K.M.G.a 1986. Factors regulating draught. Bangladesh Tea Rehabilitation Project, 1(6), pp.
16-20.
Joachim, A.W.R. 1961. The shade tree question and green manures. Tea Quari. 32: 63-68.
75
Kakoty, N. N. and S. C. Das, 1985. Some major pests of shade trees and their control. T. E. Serial
No. 18312. Tocklai Exp. Sta. 8 pp.
Kakoty, N. N. 1975. A brief review of Tocklai’s work on Biology of shade tree pests. Two Bud, 22:
74-77.
Laycock, D.H., M.S. Saxson and O.R.D. Perkins, 1964. Rep. Tea Res. Stan. Malawi 1963-64: 32-34.
Magambo, M.J.S. and M.G.R. Cannell, 1981. Dry matter production and production and partition in
relation to yield of tea. Exptl. Agric., 17- 33-38.
McCulloch, J.S.G., H.C. Perera, O. Kerfoot and N.A. Goodchild, 11965. Effect of Shade trees on tea
yield. Agric. Meteorol, 2: 385-389.
Page. J.B. and G.B. Bodman, 1951. The effect of soil physical properties on nutrient availability. In:
Mineral Nutrition, of Plants (ed. Emil Truog), 133-166.
Phukan, M.K. and G.C. Mitra, 1983. In vitro regeneration of Albizzia odoratissima benth., a shade
tree for the tea plantation of north-east India. Two Bud., 30: 54-58.
Rashid, S. A. 1986. All about BTRI in brief. Bangladesh Tea Research Institute, Srimangal,
Maulvibazar, pp. 1-3.
Sana, D. L. 1989. Tea Science, Ashrafia BoiGhar, Dhaka, pp. 7-81.
Sana, D.L. 1983. Progress of Research on Tea Pest Management, Tea. J. Bangladesh 19 (1&2): 11-
20.
Venkataramani, K.S. 1961. Shade for tea in relation to environment. UPASI Sci. Dep. (Tea Sect.)
Bull., 20: 6-21.
Visser, T. 1961b. Interplanting in tea: II. The interaction of shade with fertilizer app.ications. Tea
Quart., 32: 133-125.
Visser. T. 161a. Interplanting in tea: I. Effects of shade trees, weeds and bush crops. Tea Quart., 32:
69-82.
76
Watt, G. and H.H. Mann, 1903. The pests and blights of the tea plant. 2nd Edn. Government of India,
Calcutta.
Wight, W. 1959a. The Shade tree tradition in tea gardens of Northern India. Rep. Tocklai Exp. Station,
1958: 75-150.
Wight, W. 1959b. The shade tree tradition in tea gardens of Northern India. I. The value of Shade.
Rep. Tocklai Exp. Station, 1958: 75-98.
Zabala, N. Q. 1990. Silviculture of Species, UNDP/FAO/BGD/85/011-Field Document No. 14.
Development of Professional Education in the Forestry Sector, Institute of Forestry,
Chittagong University, Chittagong and FAO, Rome. pp. 3-104.