Date post: | 03-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | naresh-kumar |
View: | 225 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 14
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
1/14
Managing for
Organizational Integrity
by Lynn Sharp Pa ine
Reprint 94207
Harvard Business Review
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
2/14
Copyright 1994 by th e President and Fellows of H arvard C ollege. All rights reserved. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994
Many managers think of ethics as a question of
personal scruples, a conf idential m att er betw een
individuals and their consciences. These execu-
tives are quick to describe any wrongdoing as an
isolat ed incident, the w ork of a rogue employee.
The thought that the company could bear any re-sponsibility for an individuals misdeeds never en-
ters their minds. Ethics, after all , has nothing to do
w i th m anagement .
In fact, ethics has everything to do with m anage-
m ent. Rarely do the charact er flaw s of a lone actor
fully explain corporate m isconduct. More ty pically,
unethical business practice involves the ta cit, if not
explicit, cooperation of others and reflects the val-
ues, att itudes, beliefs, language, and behavioral pat -
terns that define an organizations operating cul-
ture. Ethics, th en, is as m uch an organizationa l as a
personal issue. M ana gers w ho fail t o provide proper
leadership and to institute systems that facilitate
e th ica l conduct share responsib i l i ty wi th those
w ho conceive, execute, and know ingly benefit from
corporate misdeeds.
Managers must acknowledge their role in shap-
ing organizat ional ethics a nd seize this opportunit y
to create a clima te that can strengthen the relat ion-
ships and reputa tions on w hich th eir com panies
success depends. Execut ives w ho ignore eth ics run
the risk of personal and corporate liability in to-
days increasingly t ough legal environm ent. In addi-
tion, t hey deprive their organizations of t he bene-
fits a vaila ble under new federal guidelines for sen-
tenc ing o rgan iza t ions convic ted o f w rongdo ing .
These sentencin g guidelines recognize for the first
tim e the organizat ional and m anagerial roots of un-law ful conduct and base fines partly on t he extent
to w hich companies have taken steps to prevent
that m isconduct .
Prompted by t he prospect of leniency, ma ny com -
panies are rushing to implement compliance-based
ethics programs. Designed by corporate counsel,
the goal of t hese programs is to prevent, detect, and
punish legal violations. But organizational ethics
m eans m ore than a voiding illegal pract ice; and pro-
viding employees wit h a rule book w ill do little to
address the problem s underlying unlaw ful conduct.
To foster a clim at e tha t encourages exemplary be-
havio r , co rpora t ions need a comprehensive ap-
proach that goes beyond the often punitive legal
compliance stance.
An integrity-based approach to ethics manage-
ment com bines a concern for the law w ith an em-
phasis on m anagerial responsibility for ethical be-
By support i ng et hi cal l y sound behavi or, m anagers can st rengthen
t he rel at i onshi ps and reput ati ons t heir compani es depend on.
Managing forOrganizational Integrity
by Lynn Sharp Pa ine
Lynn Shar p Pain e is associate professor at t he Har vardBusiness School, speciali zing i n m anagem ent eth ics. Hercurrent research focuses on l eadershi p and organi zation -al int egr i ty i n a global environm ent.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
3/14
DRAWINGS BY DAVID HORII 107
havior. Though integrity st rategies m ay vary in de-
sign and scope, all strive to define com panies guid-
ing values, aspirat ions, and patterns of thought an d
conduct . When int egrat ed into t he day-to-day oper-
ations of an organization, such strategies can help
prevent dam aging ethica l lapses w hile tapping into
pow erful human impulses for moral thought an dac t ion . Then an e th ica l f ramework becomes no
longer a burdensome constraint w ithin w hich com-
panies must operate, but t he governing ethos of an
organization.
How Organizations ShapeIndividuals Behavior
The once familiar picture of ethics as individ-
ualistic, unchanging, and impervious to organiza-
t ional in f luences has not stood up to scrutiny in
recent years. Sears Auto Centers and Beech-Nut
Nutrition Corporations experiences illustrate therole organizations play in shaping individuals behav-
ior and how even sound moral fiber can fray w hen
stretched too thin.
In 1992, Sears, Roebuck & C ompany w as inun-
dated w ith com plaints about i t s autom otive service
business. C onsumers and at torneys general in m ore
tha n 40 stat es had accused the company of m islead-
ing custom ers and selling them un necessary parts
and services, from brake jobs to front-end align-
m ents. It w ould be a m istake, how ever, to see this
situat ion exclusively in terms of any one individu-
als moral failings. Nor did m anagement set out t o
defraud Sears custom ers. Instead, a n um ber of orga-
nizat ional factors contributed to the problematicsales pract ices.
In the face of declining revenues, shrinking mar-
ket share, and an increasingly com petit ive market
for undercar services, Sears m anagement at tem pt-
e d to sp u r th e p e r fo rm a n c e o f i t s a u to c e n t e rs
by in t roducing new goals and incentives for em-
ployees. The company increased minim um w ork
quotas and introduced productivity incentives for
m echanics. The aut omot ive service advisers w ere
given product-specific sales quot as sell so ma ny
springs, shock absorbers, alignm ents, or brak e jobs
per shif t and paid a comm ission based on sales.
According to advisers, failure to m eet q uotas couldlead to a t rans fer o r a reduct ion in w ork hours.
Som e employees spoke of the pressure, pressure,
pressure to bring in sales.
U nder th is new set o f organizat ional pressures
and incentives, w ith few options for meeting their
sales goals legitim at ely, som e employ ees judgm ent
understandably suffered. Managements failure to
At Sears Auto
Centers,
managementsfailure to clarify the
line between
unnecessary service
and legitimate
preventive
maintenance cost
the company an
estimated $60
million.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
4/14
clarify th e line betw een unneces-
sary se rv ice and leg i t im at e pre-
v e n t i v e m a i n t e n a n c e , c o u p l e d
w i t h c o n s u m e r i g n o r a n c e, l e ft
e m p l o y e es t o c h a r t t h e i r o w n
courses through a vast gray area,
subject t o a w ide range of int erpre-tat ions. Without act ive manage-
ment support for ethical practice
a n d m e c h a n i s m s t o d e t e c t a n d
check questionable sales methods
and poor w ork, it is not surprising
th a t so m e em p l o ye es m ay h av e
reacted to cont extual forces by re-
sorting to exaggeration, careless-
ness, or even misrepresentation.
S h o r t l y a f t e r t h e a l l e g a t i o n s
against Sears became public, C EO
E d wa rd B re n n an ac k n o w l e d ge d
managements responsibi l i ty forp u t t i n g i n p l ac e c o m p e n sa t i o n
and goal-setting systems that cre-
a t e d a n e n v i r o n m e n t i n w h i c h
m i s t ak e s d i d o c c u r . A l th o u g h
th e c o m p an y d e n i e d an y i n te n t
t o d e c e i v e c o n s u m e r s , s e n i o r
e xec u t i v e s e l i m i n a te d c o m m i s-
sions for service advisers and dis-
continued sales q uotas for specif-
i c p a r t s . Th e y a l so i n s t i tu t e d a
system of unannounced shopping
audits and made plans to expand
the int ernal m onitoring of service.In sett l ing the pending law suits ,
S e a r s o f f e re d c o u p o n s t o c u s -
to m e rs w h o h ad b o u gh t c e r t a i n
aut o services betw een 1990 and
1992. The total cost of the settle-
m e n t , i n c l u d i n g po t e n t i a l c u s -
tom er refunds, was a n est imat ed
$60 million .
Contextual forces can also in-
fluence the behavior of top man-
a g e m e n t , a s a f o r m e r C E O o f
Beech-N ut N utrition C orporation
discovered. In th e early 1980s, on-
ly tw o years after joining the com-
p a n y , t h e C E O f o u n d e v i d en c e
su g ge s t i n g th a t th e ap pl e ju i c e
concentrate, supplied by th e com-
panys vendors for use in Beech-
N uts 100% pure apple juice ,
contain ed nothin g more tha n sug-
ar w at er and chemica ls. The CEO
could have destroyed the bogus in-
ventory and withdrawn the juice
from grocers shelves, but he w as
under extraordinary pressure to
turn the ai l ing company around.
Eliminating the inventory would
have k i l led any h ope o f tu rn ing
even the meager $700,000 profitpromised to Beech-N ut s th en par-
ent, Nestl.
A number of people in the cor-
poration, it turned out, had doubt-
ed the purity of th e juice for sever-
al years before the CEO arrived.
But the 25% price advantage of-
fered by the supplier of the bogus
c o n c e n t r a te a l l o we d th e o p e ra-
t ions head to mee t cos t-con tro l
goals. Furthermore, the company
lacked an effective quality control
system, and a conclusive lab testfor juice purity did not yet exist.
When a member of the research
departm ent voiced concerns a bout
th e j u i c e to o p e ra t i n g m an ag e -
ment, he was accused of not be-
i n g a t e am p laye r an d o f a c t i n g
l ike C h icken L i t t le . His judg-
ment, his supervisor wrote in an
annual performance review, was
colored by navet and impracti-
cal ideals. N o one else seemed to
have cons idered the companys
obligations to its customers or tohave thought about the potential
harm of disclosure . No one con-
s idered the f ac t tha t the sa le o f
adulterated or m isbranded juice is
a legal offense, putt ing the com pa-
ny and i t s top management at r isk
of crim inal liability.
A n FD A i n v e s t i ga t i o n t au g h t
Beech-N ut t he hard w ay. In 1987,
t h e c o m p a n y p l ea d e d gu i l t y t o
selling adulterated and m isbrand-
ed juice. Tw o years and t w o crimi-
nal tr ials later , the CEO pleaded
guil ty to ten counts o f mislabel-
ing. The total cost to the compa-
ny including fines, legal expenses,
and los t sa les w as an est imat ed
$25 million .
Such errors of judgment rarely
ref lect an organizat ional culture
and management philosophy that
sets out t o harm or deceive. More
ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY
108 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
5/14
HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994 109
often, they reveal a culture that is insensitive or in-
different t o ethical considerations or one that lacks
effective organizational systems. By the same to-
ken, exem plary conduct usually reflects a n organi-
za t ional cu l ture and ph i losophy tha t i s in fused
w ith a sense of responsibility.
For example, Johnson & Johnsons handling ofth e Tylenol crisis is somet im es at tribut ed to t he
s i n g u l a r p er so n a l i t y o f th e n -C E O
James Burke. How ever, t he decision
to do a nat ionw ide recall of Tylenol
capsu les in o rder to avo id fu r ther
loss of life from product tampering
w as in real i ty not one decision but
thousands of decisions made by indi-
viduals at all levels of the organiza-
tion. The Tylenol decision, th en,
is best un derstood not as an isolated
incident , the achievement o f a lone
individual, but as t he reflection of an organizationsculture. Without a sha red set of v alues and guiding
principles deeply ingrained throughout the organi-
zat ion, it is doubtful t hat Johnson & Johnsons re-
sponse w ould hav e been as rapid, cohesive, and eth -
ically sound.
Man y people resist ackn ow ledging the influence
of organizat ional factors on individual behavior
especially on m isconduct for fear of diluting peo-
ples sense of personal m oral responsibilit y. But t his
fear is based on a false dichotom y betw een holding
individual transgressors accountable and holding
the system accountable. Acknowledging the im-
portan ce of organizationa l context n eed not im plyexculpat ing individua l w rongdoers. To understand
all is not to forgive all .
The Limits of a LegalCompliance Program
The consequences of an et hica l lapse can be seri-
ous and far-reaching. Organizat ions can quickly be-
come enta ngled in an all-consuming w eb of legal
proceedings. The risk of litigation and liability has
increased in t he past decade as law ma kers have leg-
islated new civil and criminal offenses, stepped up
penalt ies, and im proved support for law enforce-
ment . Equal ly i f no t m ore importan t i s the dam-
age an e th ica l l apse can do to an o rgan iza t ion s
reputat ion an d relationships. Both Sears and Beech-
Nut, for instance, s truggled to regain consumer
trust and m arket share long aft er legal proceedings
had ended.
As more managers have become alerted to the
importance o f o rgan iza t ional e th ics , many have
asked their law yers to develop corporate ethics pro-
grams to detect and prevent violations of the law.
The 1991 Federal Sent encin g G uidelin es offer a
compelling rationale. Sanctions such as fines and
probation for organizations convicted of w rongdo-
ing can vary dram atica lly depending both on t he de-
gree of management cooperation in reporting and
investigating corporate m isdeeds and on w hether ornot the company has implemented a legal compli-
ance program. (See the insert C orporate Fines U n-der the Federal Sentencing G uidelines. )
Such programs t end to em phasize the prevention
of unlawful conduct, primarily by increasing sur-
veillance and cont rol and by imposing penalties for
w rongdoers. While plans vary, t he basic fram ew ork
is outlined in the sentencing guidelines. Ma nagers
m ust establish com pliance standards and procedures;
designate high-level personnel to oversee compli-
ance; avoid delegating discretionary authori ty to
those likely to act unlaw fully; effectively comm u-
nica te the companys s tandards and procedures
through training or publications; take reasonable
steps to achieve compliance through audits, mon-itoring processes, and a system for employees to
report criminal misconduct w ithout fear o f re tri-
bution; consistently enforce standards t hrough ap-
propriate disciplinary measures; respond appropri-
at ely w hen offenses are detected; and, finally, take
reasonable steps to prevent the occurrence of simi-
lar offenses in the futu re.
There is no question of the necessity of a sound,
w ell-articulat ed strategy for legal compliance in an
organizat ion. After all , employees can be frustrated
and frightened by the complexity of todays legal
environment. And even ma nagers w ho claim t o use
the law as a guide to e thical behavior o f ten lack
more than a rudimentary understanding of com-
plex legal issues.
Man agers w ould be mistaken, how ever, to regard
legal com pliance as an adequat e means for address-
ing the full range of ethical issues that arise every
day. If it s legal, it s ethica l, is a frequently heard
slogan. But conduct that is law ful may be highly
problem atic from a n ethical point of view. C onsider
the sale in some countries of hazardous products
Acknowledging the importanceof organizational context in
ethics does not imply forgivingindividual wrongdoers.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
6/14
110 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994
w ithout appropriate w arnings or the purchase of
goods from suppliers w ho operate inhum ane sw eat-
shops in developing countries. Companies engaged
in international business often discover that con-
duct t hat infringes on recognized stan dards of hu-
man rights and decency is legal ly permissible in
some jurisdictions.
Legal clearance does not certify the absence of
ethical problems in the United States either, as a
1991 case at Sa lom on Brothers illust rat es. Four top-
level executives failed to take appropriate action
w hen learning of unlaw ful activit ies on the govern-
m ent trading desk. Com pany law yers found no law
obligatin g th e executives to disclose th e im propri-
eties. Nevertheless, the executives delay in dis-
closing and failure to reveal their prior know ledge
prompted a serious crisis of confidence among em-
ployees, creditors , shareholders, and customers.
The executiv es w ere forced to resign, havin g lost
the mora l au thor i ty to lead . The ir e th ica l l apse
compounded the trading desks legal offenses, and
the com pany ended up suffering losses including
legal costs, increased funding costs, and lost busi-
ness estima ted at nearly $1 billion.
A compliance approach to e thics also overem-
phasizes the th reat of detection an d punishm ent in
order to cha nnel behavior in law ful directions. The
underlying model for this approach is deterrence
theory, w hich envisions people as rat ional ma xi-
mizers of self-interest, responsive to the personal
costs and benefits of t heir choices, yet in different to
the m oral legitim acy of those choices. But a recent
Corporate Fines Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
What size fine is a corporation likely to pay if con -
victed of a crim e? It depends on a num ber of factors,
some of w hich are beyond a C EOs control, such as the
existence of a prior record of similar m isconduct. But
it also depends on m ore controllable factors. The m ost
importan t of t hese are reporting and accepting respon-
sibil i ty for the crime, cooperat ing w ith au thorit ies ,
and having an effective program in place to prevent
and detect unlaw ful behavior.
The follow ing exam ple, based on a case studied by
t h e U n i t ed S t a t es Sen t en c in g C o m m is sio n , s h ow s
how the 1991 Federal Sentencing G uidelines have af-
fected overall fine levels and how m anagers action s
influence organizat ional f ines .
Acme C orporation w as charged
a n d c o n v i c t e d o f m a i l f r a u d .
T h e c o m p a n y s y s t em a t i c a l l y
c h a r ged c u s t o m er s w h o da m -
aged rented automobiles more
than the actual cost of repairs.
A c m e a l s o b i l l e d s o m e c u s -
tom ers for the cost of repairs to
v eh ic les f o r w h ic h t h ey w ere
n o t r es p o n s ib le . P r io r t o t h e
c r i m i n a l a d j u d i c a t i o n , A c m e
paid $13.7 million in restitut ion
to the customers wh o had been
overcharged.
D ec id in g be f o r e t h e en a c t -
ment of the sentencing guide-
lines, the judge in the criminalcase imposed a f ine o f $6.85
million, roughly half the pecu-
niary loss suffered by Acmes
custom ers. Un der the sentencin g guidelines, how ever,
the results could have been dramat ica lly dif ferent .
Acme could have been f ined anyw here from 5% to
200% the loss suffered by customers, depending on
w hether or not it had an effective program t o prevent
and detect viola t ions of law and on w hether or not i t
reported the crime, cooperated w ith aut horities, and
accepted responsibility for the unlaw ful conduct. If a
high ranking official at Acm e w ere found to have been
involved, the ma xim um fine could have been as large
as $54,800,000 or four times the loss to Acme cus-
tom ers. The follow ing chart show s a possible range of
fines for each situat ion:
What Fine Can Acme Expect?
Maximum Minimum
Program, reporting,
cooperation, responsibility
Program only
No program, no reporting
no cooperation, no responsibility
$2,740,000
10,960,000
27,400,000
$685,000
5,480,000
13,700,000
Based on Case No.: 88-266, United States Sentencing Commission,Supplementary Report on Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations.
No program, no reporting
no cooperation, no
responsibility, involvement
of high-level personnel
54,800,000 27,400,000
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
7/14
HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994 111
ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY
study reported in Wh y People O bey the Law by
Tom R. Tyler show s tha t obedience to the law is
strongly influenced by a belief in its legitim acy and
its moral correctness. People general ly feel that
they ha ve a strong obligation to obey the law . Edu-
cation about the legal standards and a supportive
environment may be al l that s required to insurecompliance.
Discipline is, of course, a necessary part of any
ethical system . Justified penalties for the infringe-
m e n t o f l eg i t i m a t e n o rm s a re f a i r
an d appropriat e. Some people do need
the threat of sanctions. How ever, an
overem phasis on potential sanctions
can be superfluous an d even counter-
product ive . Employees may rebe l
against programs that s tress penal-
ties, particularly if they are designed
and im posed w ithout em ployee in-
v o l v e m e n t o r i f th e s t an d ard s a revague o r unrea l i s t ic . Management
may talk of mutual t rust w hen unveil ing a compli-
ance plan, but employees often receive the m essage
as a w arning from on high. Indeed, the more skepti-
cal am ong them m ay view compliance programs as
nothing more than l iabi l i ty insurance for senior
management. This is not an unreasonable conclu-
sion, considering th at compliance programs rarely
address the root causes of misconduct .
Even in the best cases, legal compliance is un-
l ikely t o unleash m uch moral im agination or com-
mit ment. The law does not general ly seek to in-
spire huma n excellence or distinct ion. It is no guidefo r exemplary behavio r or even good prac t ice .
Those ma nagers w ho define ethics as legal com pli-
ance are implicitly endorsing a code of moral m edi-
ocrity for their organizations. As Richard Breeden,
former chairman of the Securi t ies and Exchange
C omm ission, noted, I t is not an adequate ethical
standard to aspire to get through the day without
being indicted.
Integrity as a Governing Ethic
A strategy based on integrity holds organizat ions
to a more robust standard. While compliance is
rooted in avoiding legal sanctions, organizational
int egrity is based on th e concept of self-governanc e
in accorda nce w ith a set of guiding principles. From
the perspective of integrity, the ta sk of ethics ma n-
agement is to define and give life to an organiza-
tions guiding values, to create an environment tha t
supports ethically sound behavior, and to inst ill a
sense of shared accountability among employees.
The need to obey t he law is view ed as a positive as-
pect o f organizat ional l i fe, rather than an unw el-
come constraint imposed by external authorities.
An integrity strategy is characterized by a con-
ception of ethic s as a driving force of an enterprise.
Ethical values shape the search for opportunities,
the design of organizational systems, and the de-
c is ion-making process used by ind iv iduals andgroups. They provide a com m on fram e of reference
and serve as a unifying force across different func-
tion s, lines of business, and em ployee groups. Orga-
nizat ional e thics helps define w hat a company is
and w hat i t s tands for .
Many in tegr i ty in i t i a t ives have s t ruc tura l fea-
tures comm on t o com pliance-based in i t iat ives: a
code of conduct, training in relevant areas of law,
m echanisms for reporting and in vestigating poten-
tial misconduct, and audits and controls to insure
tha t law s and company sta ndards are being met . In
addit ion , i f sui tably designed, an in tegri ty-based
initiat ive can establish a foundation for seeking the
legal benefits that are available under the sentenc-
ing guidelines should crimina l w rongdoing occur.(See th e insert The Ha llm arks of an Effect ive In-
tegri ty Strategy. )
But a n int egrity strat egy is broader, deeper, and
m ore demanding tha n a legal compliance initiat ive.
Broader in that it seeks to enable responsible con-
duct. D eeper in that it cut s to the ethos and operat-
ing systems of the organization and its members,
their guiding values and patterns of thought a nd ac-
tion . And more demanding in that i t requires an
activ e effort t o define the responsibilities and aspi-
ra t ions tha t cons t i tu te an o rgan iza t ion s e th ica l
compass. Above all , organizat ional ethics is seen as
the work of management. Corporate counsel may
play a role in the design and implementa tion of in-
tegri ty strategies, but managers at al l levels and
across all fu nct ions are inv olved in t he process. (See
the chart , Strategies for Ethics Mana gement. )
D uring the past decade, a num ber of companies
have undertaken integrity initia tives. They vary ac-
cording to t he ethical values focused on and t he im-
plementation approaches used. Some companies
focus on the core values of integrity tha t reflect ba -
Management may talk of mutualtrust when unveiling a
compliance plan, but employeesoften see a warning from on high.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
8/14
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
9/14
HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994 113
ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY
The corporate general counsel played a pivotal
role in promoting the program, and legal compli-
ance w as a critical objective. But it w as conceived
of and implemented from the start as a company-
w ide management in i t iat ive aimed at creating and
m aint aining a do-it-right clima te. In its original
conception, the program emphasized core values,such as honesty and fair play. Over tim e, it expand-
ed to encompass quality a nd environmental respon-
sibi l i ty as w ell .
Today t he initiat ive consists of a code of conduct,
an ethics training program, and procedures for re-
porting and investigating ethical concerns w ithin
the com pany. It a lso includes a syst em for disclos-
ing vio lat ions of federal procurement law to the
governm ent. A corporate ethics office manages the
program , and ethics representat ives are stat ioned at
major f ac i l i t ie s . An e th ics s teer ing commit tee ,
m ade up of Mart in M ariettas president, senior ex-
ecutives, and tw o rotat ing mem bers selected from
field operat ions, oversees the eth ics office. The au-dit and ethics committee of the board of directors
oversees t he steering comm itt ee.
The eth ics office is responsible for responding t o
questions and concerns from the companys em-
ployees. Its net w ork of representa tiv es serves as a
sounding board, a source of guidance, and a channel
for raising a range of issues, f rom al legations of
Strategies for Ethics Management
conformity with externally
imposed standards
prevent criminal misconduct
lawyer driven
education, reduced discretion,
auditing and controls, penalties
autonomous beings guided by
material self-interest
Ethos
Objective
Leadership
Methods
Behavioral
Assumptions
self-governance according
to chosen standards
enable responsible conduct
management driven with
aid of lawyers, HR, others
education, leadership,
accountability, organizational
systems and decision processes,
auditing and controls, penalties
social beings guided by material
self-interest, values, ideals, peers
Ethos
Objective
Leadership
Methods
Behavioral
Assumptions
Characteristics of Compliance Strategy Characteristics of Integrity Strategy
criminal and regulatory law
lawyers
develop compliance standards
train and communicate
handle reports of misconduct
conduct investigations
oversee compliance auditsenforce standards
compliance standards and system
Standards
Staffing
Activities
Education
company values and aspirations
social obligations, including law
executives and managers
with lawyers, others
lead development of company
values and standards
train and communicateintegrate into company systems
provide guidance and consultation
assess values performance
identify and resolve problems
oversee compliance activities
decision making and values
compliance standards and system
Standards
Staffing
Activities
Education
Implementation of Compliance Strategy Implementation of Integrity Strategy
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
10/14
ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY
114 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994
w ro n gd o i n g to c o m p l a i n t s ab o u t p oo r m an a g e-
m ent, unfair supervision, and company policies and
practices. Martin Ma riett as ethics netw ork, w hich
accepts anonymous complaints, logged over 9,000
calls in 1991, w hen th e company had a bout 60,000
employ ees. In 1992, it invest igated 684 cases. The
ethics office also w orks closely w ith t he huma n re-sources, legal, audit, com m unicat ions, and security
functions t o respond t o employee concerns.
Shortly aft er establishing the program , the com-
pany began its first round of ethics t raining for the
entire w orkforce, start ing wit h the C EO and senior
executives. Now in its t hird round, training for se-
nior executives focuses on decision making, the
challenges of balancing multiple responsibilities,
and compliance with law s and regulat ions crit ical
to t he company. The incentive compensation plan
for executives m akes responsibility for promot ing
ethical conduct an explicit requirement for rew ard
eligibility and requires that business and personalgoals be achieved in accordance w ith t he compa-
nys policy on ethics. Ethical conduct and support
for the ethics program are also criteria in regular
performance review s.
Today top-level ma nagers say t he ethic s program
has helped the company avoid serious problems
an d b e c o m e m o re re sp o n s i v e to i t s m o re th an
90,000 em ployees . The e th ics ne t w ork , w h ich
tracks the number and types o f cases and com-
plaints, has served as an early w arning system for
poor mana gem ent, qualit y and safety defects, racial
and gender d iscr iminat ion , environmenta l con-
cerns, inaccurate and false records, and personnelgrievances regarding salaries, promotions, and lay-
offs. By providing an alt ernative chan nel for raising
such concerns, Mart in Mariett a is able to take cor-
rective action m ore quickly a nd w ith a lot less pain.
In ma ny ca ses, potentially em barrassing problems
have been identified and dealt w ith before becom-
ing a management crisis, a lawsuit, or a criminal
investigation. Among employees w ho brought com-
plaint s in 1993, 75% w ere sat isfied w ith t he result s.
Company executives are also convinced that the
program has helped reduce the incidence of mis-
conduct. When allegations of misconduct do sur-
face , the company says i t dea ls wi th them more
openly. On several occasions, for instance, Ma rtin
Marietta has voluntarily disclosed and made resti-
tut ion to the government for misconduct involving
potential violat ions of federal procurement law s. In
addition, when an employee alleged that the com-
pany had retaliated against him for voicing safety
concerns about his plant on C BS new s, top m anage-
m ent comm issioned an investigation by an outside
law f irm. Although fai l ing to support t he al lega-
Martin Mariettas
ethics training
program teaches
senior executives
how to balanceresponsibilities.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
11/14
HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994 115
tions, the investigation found tha t employees at t he
plant feared reta liation w hen raising health , safety,
or environm ental com plaints. The company redou-
bled its efforts t o identify an d discipline those em-
ployees taking retaliatory action and stressed the
desi rab il i ty o f an open w ork environment in i t s
e thics training and company comm unications.Although the ethics program helps Mart in Ma ri-
etta avoid certain types of l i t igat ion , i t has occa-
sionally led to ot her kinds of legal action. In a few
cases, employees dismissed for violat ing the code of
ethics sued Martin M arietta , arguing that the com-
pany had violat ed its own code by im posing unfair
and excessive discipline.
Still , the company believes that its
at t ention to e thics has been w orth i t .
The ethics program has led to better
relat ionships w ith the governm ent,
as w e l l as to new business oppor-
tunit ies. Along w ith prices and t ech-nology, Martin Mariettas record of
integri ty , qual i ty , and rel iabi l i ty o f
estima tes plays a role in the aw ard-
ing of defense contracts , w hich ac-
count for some 75% of th e com pany s revenues. Ex-
ecutives believe that the reputat ion th eyve earned
through t heir ethics program has h elped them build
trust w ith government audit ors, as w ell. By open-
ing up comm unications, th e company has reduced
the tim e spent on redundant audits.
The program has also helped change employees
perceptions and priorities. Some ma nagers compare
their new w ays of th inking about e thics to the w aythey understand qualit y. They consider more care-
fully how situat ions w ill be perceived by others, the
possible long-term consequences of short- term
thinking, and the need for continuous improve-
m ent. CEO N orma n Augustine notes, Ten years
ago, people w ould have said th at there w ere no ethi-
cal issues in business. Today em ployees think t heir
num ber-one objectiv e is to be thought of as decent
people doing quality w ork.
NovaCare: Building
Shared AspirationsNovaCare Inc. , one of the largest providers o f
rehabilitation services to nursing homes and hos-
pitals in the United States, has oriented its ethics
ef fort t ow ard building a com m on core of shared
aspirat ions. But in 1988, w hen the company w as
ca l led InSpeech , th e on ly sen t im ent shared w as
mut ual mistrust .
Senior executives built the company from a se-
ries of aggressive acq uisit ions over a brief period of
t ime to take advantage of the expanding market
for therapeutic services. H ow ever, in 1988, the vi-
ability of the company w as in question. Turnover
am ong its frontline employees the clinicians and
therapists who care for patients in nursing homes
and hospitals escalated to 57% per year. The com-
pany s inab i l i ty t o re ta in t herapis ts caused cus-tom ers to defect and t he stock price to languish in
an extended slump.
After m ont hs of soul-searching, InSpeech execu-
tives realized that t he turnover rate w as a sym ptom
of a m ore basic problem : the lack of a com m on set
of values and aspirat ions. There wa s, as one execu-
tive put i t , a huge disconnect betw een t he values
of the therapists and cl in icians and those of the
m anagers who ran t he company. The therapists and
c l i n i c i an s e v a l u a te d th e c o m p an y s su c c e ss i n
term s of its delivery of high-qualit y h ealth ca re. In-
Speech m anagement , led by executives wit h finan-
cial services and venture capital ba ckgrounds, mea-
sured the company s w orth exclusively in t erms of
f inanc ia l success. M anagement s s ing le-m indedemphasis on increasing hours of reimbursable care
turned clinicians off . They t ook m anagements per-
formance orientat ion for indif ference to patient
care and left t he company in droves.
CEO John Foster recognized the need for a com-
m on frame of reference and a comm on language to
unify the diverse groups. So he brought in consul-
ta nts to conduct int erview s and focus groups w ith
the com panys health care professionals, ma nagers,
and cust omers. Based on t he results, an employee
ta sk force drafted a proposed vision stat ement for
th e company, a nd anot her 250 employ ees suggested
revisions. Then Foster and several senior ma nagers
developed a succinct statement of the companys
guiding purpose and fundam ental beliefs tha t could
be used as a framework for making decisions and
sett ing goals, policies, and practices.
U nlike a code of conduct, w hich articula tes spe-
cific behavioral stan dards, the stat ement of vision,
purposes, and beliefs lays out in very sim ple terms
th e compan ys central purpose and core values. The
purpose meeting the rehabil i tat ion needs of pa-
At NovaCare, executives definedorganizational values and
introduced structural changesto support those values.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
12/14
116 HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994
tients t hrough clinical leadership is supported by
four key beliefs: respect for the individual, service
to t he customer, pursuit of excellence, and com mit -
m ent t o personal integrity. Each value is discussed
w ith examples of how i t is manifested in the day-to-day act ivities and policies of the company, such
as how to m easure the qual i ty o f care.
To support t he new ly defined values, th e compa-
ny chan ged its name to N ovaC are and introduced a
num ber of structural a nd operat ional cha nges. Field
m ana gers and clinician s w ere given greater deci-
sion-ma king auth ori ty ; c l in icia ns w ere provided
w ith a dditional resources to assist in th e delivery of
effective therapy; and a new m anagement struct ure
integrated the v arious therapies offered by t he com-
pany. The hiring of new corporate personnel w ith
health care backgrounds reinforced the com panys
new clinical focus.
The introduction of the vision, purpose, and be-
l ie fs met with varied reactions from employees,
ranging from cool skepticism t o open enthusiasm .
One employee remem bered thinking the t alk about
v a l u e s m u c h a d o ab o u t n o th i n g . A n o th e r re-
called, It w as really w onderful. It gave us a goal
tha t everyone aspired to, no m att er w hat t heir place
in the com pany. At first, som e w ere baffled about
how th e vision, purpose, and belie fs w ere to be
used. But, over tim e, man agers became m ore adept
at explaining and using them as a guide. When a
custom er tried to hire aw ay a valued employee, for
example, man agers considered raiding the custom -
ers company for em ployees. After review ing thebeliefs, the m anagers abandoned the idea.
NovaCare managers acknowledge and company
surveys indicate that there is plenty of room for im-
provement . While th e values are used as a firm ref-
erence point for decision m aking and evaluation in
some areas of the com pany, they are still viewed
w ith reservation in others. Some m anagers do not
w alk the ta lk , employees complain . And recently
acquired companies have yet t o be fully int egrated
into the program. Nevertheless, many NovaCare
employees say t he values initiative played a critical
role in the compan ys 1990 tu rnaroun d.
The values reorientation also helped the com-
pany deal with its most serious problem: turnover
among health care providers. In 1990, the turnover
rate stood at 32%, still above target but a signifi-
cant improvement over the 1988 rate of 57%. By
1993, turnover had dropped to 27%. Moreover, re-
cruiting new clinicians became easier. Barely a ble
to hire 25 new clinicians each m onth in 1988, the
company added 776 in 1990 and 2,546 in 1993. In-
deed, one em ployee w ho left durin g the 1988 tur-
At NovaCare,
clinicians took
managements
performance
orientation forindifference to
patient care and left
the company in
droves.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
13/14
HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW March-Apri l 1994 117
ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRITY
m oil said tha t her decision to return in 1990 hinged
on t he com panys adoption of th e vision, purpose,
and beliefs.
Wetherill Associates:Defining Right Action
Wether i l l Assoc ia tes , Inc . a sma l l , pr iva te ly
held supplier of electrical parts t o the a utom otive
ma rket has neither a conventional code of con-
duct n or a sta tem ent of va lues. Instead, WAI has a
Q ual i t y A ssurance M anual a combination of phi-
losophy t ext, conduct guide, technical ma nual, and
c o m p an y p ro fi l e th a t d e sc r i be s th e c o m p an y s
commitment to honesty and its guiding principle
of right a ction.
WAI doesnt have a corporate eth-
ics officer w ho reports to t op m an-
agement, because at WAI, the com-
panys corporate ethics officer i s t opmanagement . Mar ie Bo the , WAI s
c h i e f e x e c u t i v e o f f i c e r , s e e s h e r
main function as keeping the 350-
employee company on the pa th o f
right action and looking for oppor-
tunities to help the community. She
delegates the technical aspects of
the business m arketing, f inance, personnel, opera-
tions t o o ther members o f the organizat ion .
Right act ion, t he basis for all of WAIs decisions,
is a w ell-developed approach t hat cha llenges m ost
conventional m anagement t hinking. The company
explicitly rejects t he usual conceptua l boundariesthat separate moral i ty and self- interest . Instead,
they define right behavior as logically, expediently,
and moral ly r ight . Managers teach employees to
look at the needs of the customers, suppliers, and
the community in addit ion to those of the compa-
ny and i ts employees w hen making decisions.
WAI also has a unique approach to competition.
One em ployee explains, We are not in competi-
t ion w ith any body. We just do w hat w e have to do
to serve the customer. Indeed, w hen occasionally
unable to fill orders, WAI salespeople refer cus-
tomers to competitors. Artificial incentives, such
as sales contests, are never used to spur individual
performance. Nor are sales results used in deter-
m i n i n g c o m p e n sa t i o n . I n s te ad , th e f o c u s i s o n
teamwork and customer service. Managers tell all
new recruits t hat absolute honesty, m utual cour-
tesy, and respect are standard operating procedure.
New comers generally react positively t o compa-
ny philosophy, but not all are prepared for such a
r ad i c a l d e par tu re f ro m t h e p rac t i c e s th e y h av e
know n elsew here. Recalling her initial interview,
one recruit described her response to being told t hat
lying was not a l lowed, What do you m ean? No ly-
ing? Im a buy er. I lie for a living! Today she is per-
suaded that the policy m akes sound business sense.
WAI is know n for inform ing suppliers of overship-
ments as well as undershipments and for scrupu-
lous honesty in the sale of parts, even w hen decep-tion ca nnot be readily detected.
Since its entry in to t he distribution business 13
years ago, WAI has seen its revenues clim b steadily
from just under $1 million t o nearly $98 million in
1993, and th is in an industry with l i t t le growth.
Once seen as an upstart beset by naysa yers and in-
dustry skeptics, WAI is now credited w ith entering
and professional iz ing an industry in w hich kick-
backs, bribes, and grat uities w ere comm onplace.
E m p lo ye es e qu a l n u m b e rs o f m e n an d w o m e n
ranging in age from 17 to 92 praise the w ork envi-
ronment as both productive and supportive.
WAIs approach could be difficult to i nt roduce in
a larger, more tradi t ional organizat ion . WAI is a
sma ll com pany founded by 34 people w ho shared abelief in right a ction; its ethical v alues w ere natu-
ra l ly bu i l t in to the o rgan iza t ion f rom the s tar t .
Those valu es are so deeply in grained in th e compa-
nys culture and operating systems that they have
been largely self-sustaining. Still , t he company has
developed its ow n t raining program and t akes spe-
cial ca re to hire people w illing to support right ac-
tion. Ethics and job skills are considered equally
important in determining an individuals compe-
tence and suitabilit y for employment. For WAI, th e
challenge w ill be to sustain it s vision as the compa-
ny grow s and taps into m arkets overseas.
At WAI, as a t Mar t in M ar iet ta and N ovaC are,
a management-led commitment to e thical values
has contributed to com petit iveness, positive w ork-
force morale, as w ell as solid sustainable relat ion-
ships with the companys key consti tuencies. In
the end, creating a climate that encourages exem-
plary conduct m ay be the best w ay t o discourage
damaging misconduct . Only in such an environ-
m ent do rogues really act alone.
Reprint 94207
Creating an organization thatencourages exemplary conductmay be the best way to prevent
damaging misconduct.
8/12/2019 Managing organizational integrity
14/14
H arvard Bu siness School Publ ishing
C ust om er Servi ce - Box 230-5
60 Ha rvard Way
Boston , M A 02163
Telephone: U .S. a nd C an ada (800) 545-7685
O ut side U .S. a nd C an ada : (617) 495-6117 or 495-6192
Fax: (617) 495-6985
Internet a ddress: cust [email protected] ard.edu
H a rv a rd B u s i n ess S c h o o l M an a g em e n t P ro d u ct i o n s v i d e os a re
produced by aw ard w inning documenta ry film ma kers. Youll f ind
them lively, engaging, and informat ive.
Please inquire about H BRs custom service and quant ity discount s.
We w ill print you r compan ys logo on th e cover of reprint s, collec-
tions, or books in black and w hite, tw o color, or four color. The pro-
cess is easy, cost effective, and quic k.
Teleph on e: (617) 495-6198 or Fax : (617) 496-8866
For permission t o quot e or reprint on a one-tim e basis:Teleph on e: (800) 545-7685 or Fax : (617) 495-6985
For permission t o re-publish please w rite or call :
Permissions Editor
Ha rvard Business School Publishing
Box 230-5
60 Ha rvard Way
Boston, MA 02163
Teleph on e: (617) 495-6849
HBR Subscriptions
HBR Article ReprintsHBR Index and Other CatalogsHBS CasesHBS Press Books
HBS Management ProductionsVideos
HBR Custom Reprints
Permissions
Harvard Business Review
H arvard Business Review
U .S. and C anada
Subscription Service
P.O. Bo x 52623
Bould er, C O 80322-2623
Teleph on e: (800) 274-3214
Fax: (617) 496-8145
Outside U.S. and Canada
Tow er House
Sovereign Park
Lathkill Street
Ma rket H arborough
Leicest ershire LE16 9EF
Teleph on e: 44-85-846-8888
Fax : 44-85-843-4958
American Express, Ma sterC ard, VISA accepted. Billing avail able.