+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: loyal
View: 25 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs. Dr Caroline Grant Medical Device Domain Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation. Instron load cell: Force Position (1-10MB per test). FARO arm Position (
Popular Tags:
7
Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs Dr Caroline Grant Medical Device Domain Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Transcript
Page 1: Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

Managing Research Data:Mechanical testing and modelling of

bone-implant constructs

Dr Caroline GrantMedical Device Domain

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation

Page 2: Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

1. Instron load cell:• Force• Position(1-10MB per test)

2. JR3 6 axis load cell:• Force x3• Torque x3(~100kB per test)

3. FARO arm• Position(<1MB per test)

4. Strain Gauges• Surface strain

(deformation)(50-100MB per test)

5. Optotrak• Optical position

tracking(50-200MB per test)

γ β

α3 sample types

7 load cases

5 computersTotal up to 300MB

In ~100 filesPer test, raw data

Page 3: Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs
Page 4: Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

CT

~ 200MB

~ 2-10GB per analysis1 test = up 10+ analyses

Solid model from CT, align to mech test FARO arm data

Page 5: Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

Total data generated last 9 months of PhD

• Mechanical testing – 4.25GB– 1655 Files, 225 Folders

• Modelling – 1.47TB– 7072 Files, 1456 Folders

Page 6: Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

Retention Periods for Research Data*Research Data and records from research project that describe the research, permissions, contractual agreements and ownership of the data.Description (nature of the research) Retention PeriodSignificantResearch data of high public interest or significance to the discipline such that it has or will change a commonly-held view or approach.Factors which may determine significance include, projects which:• are controversial,• are the subject of extensive debate;• arouse widespread scientific or other interest;• involve the use of major new techniques;• involve eminent researchers; or• have the potential to cause major adverse impacts on the environment,

society or human health.• are costly or impossible to reproducehave community or heritage value.

Permanent

Clinical Trials – adults Retain for 15 years after completion of clinical research/trial or publication AND 10 years after last patient service provision or medico-legal action (601.2/C122)

Clinical Trials - children Retain for 25 years after date of birth of childInvolving psychological testing or intervention with adults. Retain for 7 years after publication of resultsInvolving psychological testing or intervention with children Retain for 25 years after date of birth of childResulting in a patent (not involving clinical trials) Retain for 7 years after expiry of patentResulting in publication (not involving clinical trials) Retain for 5 years after publication of resultsNot  resulting in publication (not involving clinical trials) Retain for 5 years after conclusion or

abandonment of the project.Short term research projects that are for assessment purposes Retain for 12 months after the completion of

the projectResearch Data collections where there is an obligation to lodge data with a national or international repository or archive for the discipline (Not involving clinical trials)

Lodge in archive/repository and retain one copy for QUT where there is a significant local benefit in doing so e.g. teaching.

Page 7: Managing Research Data: Mechanical testing and modelling of bone-implant constructs

Researchers nightmare• Research at a children’s hospital

– Human ethics approval for clinical research on children in the intensive care unit– Raw data, processed data, analysed data ~8 years of data

• IT department : New backup system! Yay!– All processed data corrupted– Some analysed data corrupted– Some raw data corrupted– Saved by having our own backup system (after having been advised not to)– IT repeatedly claimed there was no problem with the system

• Threatened to sue• Involved data safety monitoring committee

• This is a major problem because:– Unethical– If you breach data safety monitoring guidelines, ethics will not approve future studies– If you can’t get ethics approval, you can’t get grants.– By QUT’s guidelines this data needs to be kept for 25years after the date of birth of the

last child recruited


Recommended