+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand...

MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand...

Date post: 28-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
28
MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR FORT BEND AND HARRIS COUNTIES, TEXAS Bonny M. Berkner Illustrated Paper The Association of American Geographers 96th Annual Meeting Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (4-8 April 2000)
Transcript
Page 1: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR FORT BEND AND HARRIS COUNTIES,

TEXAS

Bonny M. Berkner

Illustrated Paper The Association of American Geographers

96th Annual MeetingPittsburgh, Pennsylvania (4-8 April 2000)

Page 2: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

What is the American Community Survey?

• A program to provide information every year for communities that is normally collected every ten years in the decennial census about:

– age, gender, race/ethnicity

– families, children, the elderly

– income, poverty

– education

– work, unemployment

– commuting patterns

– housing

Page 3: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

What are the Goals of the American Community Survey?

• Provide federal, state, and local governments an information base for the administration and evaluation of government programs.

• Provide an alternative to the 2010 Census long-form data collection.

• Provide data users with timely demographic, housing, social, and economic data updated every year that can be compared across states, communities, and population groups.

Page 4: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Stage 1: Demonstration Period 1996-1998

• 1996

– Brevard County, FL

– Multnomah County, OR (Portland)

– Rockland County, NY

– Fulton County, PA

• 1997 - added

– Franklin County, OH (Columbus)

– Douglas County, NE (Omaha)

– Ft. Bend and Harris Counties, TX (Houston)

– Otero County, NM

• 1998 - added

– Broward County, FL (Replace Brevard County, Florida)

– Richland and Kershaw Counties, SC - Decennial Census Dress Rehearsal counties

Page 5: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002

• Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American Community Survey.

• Provide a bridge to interpret changes between Census 2000 and the 2003-04…2003-07 American Community Survey.

• 31 sites, including eight from the 1996-1998 Demonstration Period.

Page 6: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

1999-2002 Sites• 1-percent household sample in:

– Harris and Fort Bend Counties, TX

• 3-percent household sample in:

– Broward County, FL

– Bronx, NY

– Lake County, IL

– San Francisco, CA

– Franklin County, OH

• 5-percent household sample in:

– Pima County, AZ

– Jefferson County, AR

– Tulare County, CA

– Upson County, GA

– Black Hawk County, IA

– Miami County, IN

– DeSoto Parish, LA

– Calvert County, MD

– Hampden County, MA

• 5-percent household sample in:

– Madison County, MS

– Iron, Reynolds, and Washington Counties, MO

– Flathead and Lake Counties, MT

– Douglas County, NE

– Rockland County, NY

– Otero County, NM

– Multnomah County, OR

– Fulton County, PA

– Schuylkill County, PA

– Sevier County, TN

– Starr County, TX

– Zapata County, TX

– Petersburg, VA

– Yakima County, WA

– Ohio County, WV

– Oneida and Vilas Counties, WI

Page 7: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Stage 3: Full Implementation 2003 and Beyond

• Begin national sample of 3 million addresses across all counties.

• Provide a yearly profile for communities of 65,000 or more, beginning in 2004 and each year thereafter.

• 2- to 5-year accumulations for communities of less than 65,000 population.

Page 8: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

How does the American Community Survey Work?

• A large, continuous demographic survey which:– Uses a Master Address File (MAF), a complete listing of

all residential address and group quarters in the country, for sample selection

– Mails questionnaires each month to a new sample of households

– Conducts telephone interviews for those who did not mail back the questionnaire

– Selects a 1:3 sample of addresses still not interviewed and conducts personal interviews

– Completes data collection for each sample in three months

Page 9: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Using the 1998 American Community Survey to Address the Changing Immigrant

Population in Fort Bend and Harris Counties, Texas

• Purpose: provide an example of the type of analysis for which the American Community Survey data can be used.

• Why choose Fort Bend and Harris County?– These two counties were the largest 1998 site

– These two counties are part of the large Houston metropolitan area which is dynamic in nature

Page 10: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Data and Methodology for the 1998 American Community Survey - Fort Bend

and Harris Counties, Texas

• The primary sampling unit was the housing unit, including all occupants. Group quarters were not included in the sample.

• Sampling rate was 3 percent for each Texas county.

• Confidentiality edits were applied to the data to assure that published data do not disclose information about specific individuals, households, or housing units.

Page 11: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Native and Foreign-Born Populations, as Defined by the U.S. Census Bureau

• Native population includes individuals born in the United States or an outlying area of the United States, and individuals who were born in a foreign country, but who had at least one parent who was a U.S. citizen.

• Foreign-born population is all individuals born in a foreign country except those who had at least one parent who was a U.S. citizen. This includes all foreign-born individuals residing in the United States, regardless of their legal status.

• Foreign-born population is the sum of the naturalized people and the non-citizens.

Page 12: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

All Graphs and Maps are for Fort Bend and Harris Counties, Texas, using the 1998

American Community Survey

Page 13: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Percent Native and Foreign-Born Population: 1998

*Naturalized and not a citizen sum to foreign-born population.

81.2

6.1

12.7

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

Native *Naturalized *Not a Citizen

Page 14: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American
Page 15: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American
Page 16: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Percent Foreign-Born by Region of Birth and Citizenship Status: 1998

Not a Citizen

Europe5%

Asia20%

Africa3%

Mexico52%

Central America

Other12%

Northern America

2%

Caribbean2%

South America

4%

Naturalized

Europe7%

Asia38%

Mexico31%

Central America

Other8%

Northern America

1%

Africa5%

Caribbean5%

South America

5%

Page 17: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Length of Residence in the U.S. and Citizenship Status for Foreign-Born Mexicans and Asians:

1998

9.7

34.327.5

73.3

93.0

26.7

72.565.7

96.1 90.3

3.9 7.0

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

5 yr or less 6-10 yr inUS

11 plus yrin US

5 yr or less 6-10 yr inUS

11 plus yrin US

Mexico Asia

Not a Citizen Naturalized

Page 18: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Age of the Population by Nativity and Citizenship Status: 1998

33.4

15.0

39.4

55.2

65.4

19.4

31.2

15.7

9.6

4.0

3.97.8

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Native Naturalized Not a Citizen

Under 18 18-44 Yr Old 45-64 Yr Old 65 Plus

Page 19: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Median Age of the Population by Region of Birth: 1998

30

38 37

32 32

3936

4141

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Native Europe Asia Africa Caribbean Mexico CentralAmerica

Other

SouthAmerica

NorthernAmerica

Page 20: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Educational Attainment of the Population 25 Years Old and Over by Nativity, Length of Residence in the U.S. and

Citizenship Status: 1998

52.7

30.0

44.9

48.3

35.1

44.0

14.8

27.2

38.0

32.1

28.2

31.9

31.3

55.4

20.1

32.0

23.0

24.6

29.8

33.1

23.5

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Not a Citizen

Naturalized

CITIZENSHIP STATUS

11 plus years

6-10 years

5 yr or less

LENGTH OF RESIDENCE

FOREIGN-BORN ONLY:

Foreign-Born

Native

Less than high school graduate High school and less than four years of college Bachelor's degree or more

Page 21: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Educational Attainment of the Population 25 Years Old and Over by Region of Birth: 1998

5.1

19.0

63.7

71.7

15.8

6.1

17.2

8.1

14.8

48.2

47.4

29.8

23.8

61.2

39.5

33.4

41.3

55.4

46.6

33.6

6.6

4.5

49.4

50.6

29.8

54.4

23.1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Northern America

South America

Other Central Am.

Mexico

Caribbean

Africa

Asia

Europe

Native

Less than high school graduate High school and less than four years of college Bachelor's degree or more

Page 22: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Median Household Income by Nativity, Length of Residence, and Citizenship Status: 1998

$25,161

$40,013

$33,514

$24,222

$21,939

$29,754

$42,649

$39,954

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000

Not a Citizen

Naturalized

CITIZENSHIP STATUS

11 plus years

6-10 years

5 yr or less

LENGTH OF RESIDENCE

FOREIGN-BORN ONLY:

Foreign-Born

Native

TOTAL

Median Household Income

Page 23: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Median Household Income by Region of Birth: 1998

$60,554

$35,324

$23,690

$24,092

$35,225

$29,653

$44,444

$54,275

$42,649

$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000

Northern America

South America

Other Central Am.

Mexico

Caribbean

Africa

Asia

Europe

Native

Median Household Income

Page 24: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American
Page 25: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American
Page 26: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Residence Five Years Ago for Native and Foreign-Born Inter-County Movers: 1998

Native

Northeast5%

Midwest9%

South19%

West12%

Abroad4%

Different County in

Texas51%

Foreign-Born

Different County in

Texas15%

Northeast4%

Midwest3%

South5%

West7%

Abroad66%

Page 27: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

Conclusion

• The American Community Survey also provides information for:

– Distribution of public funding

– Comparing your community with others

– Identifying community problems and solutions

– Location of highways, schools, and hospitals

– Stimulating economic growth

– Evaluating programs such as welfare and workforce diversification

Page 28: MAPPING AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY DATA FOR ......Stage 2: Comparison Study 1999-2002 •Understand and measure differences between the traditional census long form and the American

For More Information

• American Community Survey Internet site– Go to the Census Bureau’s website at www.census.gov

– Click on Subjects A-Z• Click on American Community Survey for information

about the survey

• Click on American FactFinder for data tables– Click on Population and Housing Facts

– Click on Detailed Tables

• Email us at [email protected]

• Contact Author– Bonny M. Berkner, Population Division

– 301-457-2454

[email protected]


Recommended