March 19, 2013 Agenda Packet

City Council Agenda Page 1 of 5 March 19, 2013

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING

AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, March 19, 2013 McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room

500 Rio Concho Drive THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, ROOM 210, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. every day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.

As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You!

I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)

A. Call to Order

B. Prayer and Pledge

"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.”

C. Proclamations

Nutrition Month, March 2013, to be accepted by Betty Teston, Big Country Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics, local organization for Dietitians and members of the American Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics (form)

Lutheran Schools Month, March 2013, to be accepted by by Ron Fritsche, Principal of Trinity Lutheran School

D. Recognition

Rex Rogers, for winning the contest suggesting the name for the City’s government access channel SATV

E. Public Comment

The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular Agenda for public comment.

II. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consideration of approving the February 26, 2013 City Council Special meeting minutes and the

March 5, 2013 City Council Regular meeting minutes 2. Consideration of adopting a Resolution awarding bid CFM-01-13for Pest Control Services to Bug

Express authorizing the City Manager to execute related documents (submitted by Construction & Facilities Manager Ron Lewis)


3. Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal located at Lot 104, Group Shady Point, 6678 Knickerbocker Road (Persely), and authorizing the Water Utilities Director to execute the same (submitted by Interim Water Utilities Director Ricky Dickson)

4. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the Mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment:

a. 1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street, (Gonzalez), Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale, $1,000.00, Suit No.B99-0081-T

b. 207 E Avenue L, (Perez), E 50’ x 238’ of a 1 acre Tract, Fisher Miller, $750.00, Suit No.TAX89-0388B c. 725 Hughes Street, (Salinas), Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell, $950.00, Suit No. B-03-0087-T d. 816 Volney, (Salinas) Portion of Lots 6-8, Block 28, Miles, 1,500.00, Suit No. B-05-0192-T e. 111 E 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 7, Block 57, Miles, $1,200.00, Suit No. B-97-0170-T f. 329 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, $750.00, Suit No.TAX90-0083B g. 1916 Shelton, (Sanchez), S ½ of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres, $2,500.00, Suit No.B-00-0043-T

5. Consideration of adopting a Resolution allowing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau allocating Hotel Occupancy Tax funds (submitted by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane)

6. Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials for the election to be held on May 11, 2013; and providing for an effective date (submitted by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez)

7. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the San Angelo Independent School District (SAISD) providing for construction by the City of recreational and park improvements, not to exceed $175,000.00, for public use on property owned by the SAISD generally known as Bradford Elementary School, to be maintained by the SAISD (submitted by Parks and Recreation Director Carl White)

8. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amended lease agreement amending the original lease agreement between City of San Angelo and Howard County Junior College District, including extending the original lease term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises (submitted by Assistant City Manager Rick Weise)

9. Consideration of adopting a Resolution endorsing certain legislative action in the Regular Session of the 83rd Texas Legislature to enhance the competitive electric market and system reliability and to protect the traditional role of cities in the regulatory process (submitted by City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling)

10. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (submitted Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver)

PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CH) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY



Z 13-02: Debbie Clark

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


Z 13-03: Tom Green County

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE


FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


Z 13-07: City of San Angelo Planning

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

16. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending established boundaries of Single Member District 1 (submitted by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCORPORATING NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS INTO SAID DISTRICT, PROVIDING FOR PRECLEARANCE AND ALL OTHER NECESSARY ACTIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

III. REGULAR AGENDA:

F. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo

G. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT

17. Update on the design and construction activities for the Hickory Aquifer Water Supply Project

(Presentation by Interim Water Utilities Director Ricky Dickson and Hutch Musallam with Carollo Engineers)

18. First public hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013 Budget for new projects, incomplete projects, capital projects and grants

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR NEW PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS

(Presentation by Budget Analyst Steve Mahaffey)


19. Public hearing and consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the adoption of the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan for the City of San Angelo

(Presentation by Budget Analyst Laura Brooks) 20. Discussion of prohibiting commercial vehicles from using certain streets and parking in certain areas

within the San Angelo city limits and any action in connection thereto (Presentation by City Engineer Clinton Bailey)

21. Consideration of granting a request for temporary placement of a mobile home, not to exceed one year, during construction of a permanent home on the same 3 acre site. 1105 West 48th Street, located approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of Lake Drive and West 48 Street; more specifically occupying the Chandler Subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 2, in northwest San Angelo (Presentation by Interim Director of Development Services AJ Fawver)

22. First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the allocation method of Hotel Occupancy Tax and related matters AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CHAPTER 5 “BUSINESS AND COMMERCE”, ARTICLE 5.800 “HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX”, SECTION 5.805 “PURPOSE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX”, BY REPEALING SAID SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 5.805 ENTITLED, “USE OF REVENUE”, TO REMOVE THE MANDATED ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES ON A FIXED PERCENTAGE BASIS AND TO PROVIDE FOR ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES PERMITTED BY LAW AS CITY COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE WILL PROVIDE THE BEST VALUE IN APPLICATION OF HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE TO THE CITIZENS OF SAN ANGELO BY RESOLUTION FROM TIME TO TIME (Presentation by Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane)

23. Discussion and update on the housing data obtained by Hotel/Community Housing Committee Members (Requested by Councilmember Hirschfeld and presentation by City Manager Daniel Valenzuela)

H. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

24. Consideration of and possible action on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session, if needed 25. Consideration of approving a Board nomination by Council and designated Councilmember:

a. Planning Commission: Valerie Priess (Mayor) to an unexpired term January 2014 26. Consideration of nominating City Council Members to serve as representatives on the Concho Valley

Council of Government General Assembly 27. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items 28. Adjournment

Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Tuesday, March 12, 2013, at 5:00 P.M.

/s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 6/21/10

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: February 20, 2013

To: Mayor and Council Members

From: Ron Lewis, Construction and Facilities Maintenance

Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting

Contact: Ron Lewis, 481.2773

Caption: Consent

Adoption of a resolution awarding a contract for Pest Control Services between the City of San Angelo and Bug Express, and authorizing the Mayor and/or City Manager to execute said contract.

Summary:

The City of San Angelo posted RFB:CFM-01-13 on the COSA website and advertised twice in the San Angelo Standard Times Newspaper, and directly notified 13 vendors for Pest Control Services. Ten vendors were located in San Angelo. The bids were opened on February 1, 2013. Four vendors responded. Bug Express provided the best value for the City of San Angelo. The initial term of the contract is for three (3) years with two (2) options to extend for a period of one (1) year each.

History: Construction and Facilities Maintenance and the Purchasing Department prepared RFB: CFM-01-13 for Pest Control Services. Several calls where made to current users of Bug Express. All had good reports to their service and one mentioned they were on a first name basis with their service person. They work well with scheduling and coordinating when having to gain access to large numbers of housing unit.

Financial Impact: Total impact is $9,790.00 per year budgeted throughout several City department accounts. Departments paying annually will receive a 5% discount.

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

Financial Vision: Review contracted services on annual basis to ensure highest and best use of public funds.

Other Information/ Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval of the contract with Bug Express for Pest Control Services.

Attachments: Resolution, Contract, RFB:CFM-01-13 Bid Tab

Presentation: NA

Publication: NA

Reviewed by Director:

Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager

Approved by Legal:

C:\Users\bryan.kendrick\Desktop\03-19-13\02 PUR CFM-01-13Bid

Facilities FrequencyBid Per Frequency Per year

Bid Per Frequency Per year



1 City Hall Monthly 50.00$ 600.00$ 21.00$ 252.00$ 350.00$ 4,200.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 2 Community Development Building Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 21.00$ 252.00$ 150.00$ 1,800.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 3 Water Billing & Collection Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 17.00$ 204.00$ 125.00$ 1,500.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 4 Santa Fe Crossing Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 17.00$ 204.00$ 225.00$ 2,700.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 5 Station 618 Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 20.00$ 240.00$ 155.00$ 1,860.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 6 Carl Ray Center Monthly 15.00$ 180.00$ 20.00$ 240.00$ 102.50$ 1,230.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 7 Southside Recreation Monthly 15.00$ 180.00$ 20.00$ 240.00$ 175.00$ 2,100.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 8 Municipal Pool Monthly 15.00$ 180.00$ 20.00$ 240.00$ 102.50$ 1,230.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 9 Nature Center Monthly 15.00$ 180.00$ 20.00$ 240.00$ 102.50$ 1,230.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$

10 Municipal Court Monthly 20.00$ 240.00$ 20.00$ 240.00$ 95.00$ 1,140.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 11 Wastewater Treatment Plant Quarterly 50.00$ 200.00$ 55.00$ 220.00$ 225.00$ 900.00$ 200.00$ 800.00$ 12 Police Dept Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 30.00$ 360.00$ 300.00$ 3,600.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 13 Training Facility Monthly 20.00$ 240.00$ 45.00$ 540.00$ 125.00$ 1,500.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 14 Building / 505 S. Chadbourne Monthly 15.00$ 180.00$ 15.00$ 180.00$ 125.00$ 1,500.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 15 Gun Range Quarterly 30.00$ 120.00$ 50.00$ 200.00$ 200.00$ 800.00$ 150.00$ 600.00$ 16 McNease Convention Center Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 30.00$ 360.00$ 350.00$ 4,200.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 17 City Auditorium Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 20.00$ 240.00$ 150.00$ 1,800.00$ 100.00$ 1,200.00$ 18 Coliseum Monthly 35.00$ 420.00$ 40.00$ 480.00$ 375.00$ 4,500.00$ 200.00$ 2,400.00$

19 Animal Shelter

Every 3 weeks (17 billing periods) 35.00$ 595.00$ 25.00$ 425.00$ 155.00$ 2,635.00$ 100.00$ 1,700.00$

20 Public Safety Communications

Spring & summer every Mo./Fall-Winter every Other Mo

(9 mos) 30.00$ 270.00$ 35.00$ 315.00$ 92.50$ 832.50$ 50.00$ 450.00$ 21 Central Fire Dept Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 22 Training Center Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 23 Station #2 Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 24 Station #3 Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 25 Station #4 Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 26 Station #5 Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 27 Station #6 Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 28 Station #7 Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 29 Station #8 Every Other Mo. 25.00$ 150.00$ 25.00$ 150.00$ 125.00$ 750.00$ 50.00$ 300.00$ 30 Water Distribution And Collection Monthly 30.00$ 360.00$ 22.00$ 264.00$ 152.50$ 1,830.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 31 Cemetery Office Quarterly 20.00$ 80.00$ 35.00$ 140.00$ 62.50$ 250.00$ 50.00$ 200.00$ 32 Parks Dept. Quarterly 20.00$ 80.00$ 35.00$ 140.00$ 125.00$ 500.00$ 100.00$ 400.00$ 33 Santa Fe Train Museum Quarterly 20.00$ 80.00$ 30.00$ 120.00$ 125.00$ 500.00$ 50.00$ 200.00$ 34 Emergency Operations Center Monthly 20.00$ 240.00$ 17.00$ 204.00$ 125.00$ 1,500.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$

35 Ralph Chase State Services Center Monthly 25.00$ 300.00$ 25.00$ 300.00$ 300.00$ 3,600.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 36 Texas Workforce Solutions Monthly 25.00$ 300.00$ 25.00$ 300.00$ 225.00$ 2,700.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 37 Employee Health Clinic Monthly 20.00$ 240.00$ 22.00$ 264.00$ 92.50$ 1,110.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$

CITY OF SAN ANGELOBID TAB

CFM-01-13 PEST CONTROL SERVICEFebruary 1, 2013 / 2:00pm

Better Choice Bug Express Jim's Pest Control Thrash Pest Control

C:\Users\bryan.kendrick\Desktop\03-19-13\02 PUR CFM-01-13Bid

CITY OF SAN ANGELOBID TAB

CFM-01-13 PEST CONTROL SERVICEFebruary 1, 2013 / 2:00pm

Better Choice Bug Express Jim's Pest Control Thrash Pest Control38 Airport Terminal Monthly 20.00$ 240.00$ 18.00$ 216.00$ 155.00$ 1,860.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$

39 Control TowerSemi-Monthly (24 per year) 20.00$ 480.00$ 15.00$ 360.00$ 205.00$ 4,920.00$ 50.00$ 1,200.00$

40 Flight Services StationSemi-Monthly (24 per year) 20.00$ 480.00$ 15.00$ 360.00$ 305.00$ 7,320.00$ 50.00$ 1,200.00$

41 Water Quality Lab Quarterly $20.00 80.00$ $25.00 100.00$ $102.50 410.00$ $50.00 200.00$ GRAND TOTAL 1,040.00$ 10,415.00$ 1,050.00$ 9,790.00$ 6,780.00$ 74,507.50$ 2,600.00$ 25,250.00$

2 10 2 5

Annual pay 10% off

Annual in advance - 5%

discount

none we have already placed

discounts in the bid

20% discount for annual pay

Yes Yes Yes Yes

Yes Yes n No

No No n/a n/a

N/a n.a n/a n/a

Invitation to Bids Mailed To:A&A Pest San Angelo, TX Hi-Tech Pest Defense San Angelo, TXA Ban Exterminators San Angelo, TX Orkin Pest Control Abilene, TXB Better Choice Pest Control Tom Bean, TX Terminix International San Angelo, TXAffordable Pest Control San Angelo, TX Pioneer Termite & Pest Control San Angelo, TXBug Experts Pest Control San Angelo, TX Rex Pest Control San Angelo, TXBug Express San Angelo, TX Rhino Pest Control Mertzon, TXFarmers Daughter Landscape San Angelo, TX

If so, how much and what are the terms?

Current number of certified pest control technicians:

List any discounts available (annual pay, etc.):

Vendor Agrees to allow Piggy-Back Procurements

Will you accept Credit Card Payments?

If you accept Credit Card Payments, will you offer a discount?

City of San Angelo

Memo

Date: March 8, 2013

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director

Subject: Consent Item for March 19, 2013 Council Meeting

Contact: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director, 657-4209

Caption: Consideration of approving a residential lease renewal with David and Kerry Persely, at Lot 104, Group Shady Point, 6678 Knickerbocker Road; and authorizing the Water Utilities Director to execute the same.

Summary: The leaseholder’s current lease expires in 2043 and they would like to execute a new 40 year lease for financing purposes.

History: Lease fees are current and there are no issues with the lease on this tract.

Financial Impact: Current lease fees: 2013-2016 $450.00 2017-2043 Market Value New lease fees: 2013-2016 $540.00 2017-2053 Market Value Related Vision Item (if applicable): None.

Other Information/Recommendation: It is recommended that the lease renewal be approved and the Water Utilities Director be authorized to execute the lease. Staff recommends approval. Attachments: Lease Renewal Agreement (Persely) Presentation: None.

Publication: None. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director March 8, 2013

WU-Lease%20Renewal-Persely,%20Lot%20104,%20Group%20Shady%20Point.docx

1

LAKE NASWORTHY RESIDENTIAL LOT LEASE

This lease is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SAN ANGELO, a Texas municipal corporation, ("Lessor"), whose address is 72 W. College Avenue, San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903, and David and wife, Kerry Persely, whose address is 6678 Knickerbocker Road, San Angelo, Texas 76904 ("Lessee").

I. DEMISE OF LEASED PREMISES 1.1 In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth in this lease, Lessor hereby demises and leases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby accepts and leases from Lessor, the following described real property (hereinafter called "leased premises") situated in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas:

Lot 104, Group Shady Point, Lake Nasworthy Addition, according to the map or plat of said Lake Nasworthy Campsites in the custody of the Water Utilities Department of the City of San Angelo (also commonly known as 6678 Knickerbocker Road).

II. TERM, FEES AND RENT

FIXED COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION DATE

2.1 This lease is granted for a period of forty (40) years having an effective date beginning March 1, 2013 and ending April 30, 2053, in consideration of the initial payment of $150.00, which payment includes the granting fee, receipt of which payment is hereby acknowledged, and the further consideration of Lessee's payment of future annual rent in accordance with subsequent paragraphs hereof and Lessee's compliance with the stipulations and conditions hereinafter set forth.

TIME AND MANNER OF PAYMENT 2.2 Lessee shall pay annual rent to Lessor at the San Angelo Water Utilities Department, 72 W. College Avenue, San Angelo, Texas, 76903, or at such other place as Lessor may from time to time designate by written notice to Lessee. Such rent shall be paid annually on or before July 1 during the term of this lease in accordance with the following schedule:

Dates Annual Rent

For the Years 2013 Through 2016 $540.00

For the Years 2017

Through 2052

* Market Value

2

* Annual rent shall be the appraised market value of the leased premises multiplied by a factor of 0.08. Such appraised market value shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with applicable City ordinances in effect at the time of execution of this lease.

DELINQUENT PAYMENTS 2.3 Lessee shall pay to Lessor a late charge or interest for any rent received by Lessor after the date that the rent is due in accordance with established ordinances, provided however, that this provision for late charges or interest shall not be construed as a waiver of the right of Lessor to terminate this lease at its option as authorized herein.

HOLD OVER 2.4 Any holding over by Lessee of the herein leased premises after the expiration of this lease shall operate and be construed only as a tenancy from month to month, terminable at the will of Lessor.

III. DEBTS RELATED TO LEASED PREMISES

UTILITIES 3.1 Any utility charges shall be paid in full by Lessee when due. Failure to pay such charges may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor.

TAXES 3.2 It is further understood and agreed that Lessee shall pay and discharge all taxes, general and special assessments, and other charges of every description which during the term of this lease may be levied on or assessed against the leased premises and all interest therein and all improvements and other property thereon, whether belonging to Lessor or Leaser to which either of them may become liable. Lessee shall pay all such taxes, charges, and assessments to the public officer charged with the collection thereof not less than fifteen (15) days before the same shall become delinquent, and Lessee agrees to indemnify and save harmless Lessor from all such taxes, charges and assessments. Failure to pay such taxes and special assessments as provided herein may be deemed a default at the option of Lessor.

WATER, SEWAGE, PAVING IMPROVEMENTS 3.3 In the event the Lessor lays sewer and/or water lines on, adjacent to or in the vicinity of the leased premises, Lessee agrees to pay the pro rata front-foot cost of laying said line or lines as established by and in accordance with city policies then in existence. 3.4 Lessee expressly agrees that if city water or sewer lines are ever located within 200 feet of the leased premises, Lessee will tie on to such service at its own expense at the price established for that specific Lake Nasworthy area.

3

3.5 In the event the Lessor institutes a paving program abutting the leased premises, Lessee shall pay his pro rata share of paving, curb and gutter costs pursuant to prevailing city policies.

IV. RULES AND REGULATIONS 4.1 The rules and regulations provided in those certain ordinances of the City Council of the City of San Angelo, ("Council"), adopted April 2, 1951, and now known as the Lake Nasworthy-Twin Buttes Ordinances and any and all subsequent amendments adopted heretofore or hereafter are expressly incorporated herein by reference as terms and conditions of this lease. This lease is expressly made subject to any ordinances adopted in the future by the Council for the regulation of Lake Nasworthy and surrounding property, including but not limited to, safety, sanitation, and ecological requirements. This lease will be managed by the Water Utilities Department of the City of San Angelo subject to the approval of the Council.

V. USE OF LEASED PREMISES

CONSTRUCTION BY LESSEE 5.1 The premises shall be used only for a single family residence and lawful uses incidental thereto, and in this connection the following shall be applicable:

a. No structure shall be constructed in excess of two stories in height.

b. No dwelling or residence shall be located nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2 foot elevation line.

c. No housetrailer, shack, tent, or temporary residence of any type shall be permitted on the leased premises, and no garage or other accessory building shall be used as a residence.

d. All structures shall have a foundation that complies with Lessor's building code.

e. No outside toilets shall be constructed or maintained on leased premises, and all plumbing shall be connected with a sanitary sewer or with a septic tank which complies in all respects to all state, county and city sanitation regulations and requirements. No septic tank shall be placed, constructed, or maintained nearer than 75 feet to the 1,872.2 foot elevation line nor nearer than five (5) feet to any property line. All wastewater facilities shall conform to all of the City's wastewater ordinances, where applicable. No sewer or drain shall empty into the lake or be constructed so as to flow or wash into the lake. No concrete storm drains may be constructed without the prior approval of the Water Utilities Department, Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or Council, as applicable.

f. No structure shall be constructed closer than five (5) feet to any property line.

4

g. No trees may be removed from the leased premises without the prior written consent of the Water Utilities Director.

h. No improvements or construction work of any kind, including but not limited to, houses, boathouses, piers, pump houses, water wells, storage buildings, fences, excavations, fills, and other types of structures or improvements, shall be built or performed on leased premises without prior approval of the Water Utilities Department, Zoning Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission and/or Council, as applicable.

i. Lessee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo ("Code"), as such now exists or may hereafter be amended including, but not limited to, those provisions regarding building permits and permit fees; inspections and fees therefore; building, plumbing, electrical, and fire standards or requirements; and the regulation of septic tanks.

j. After any permit is granted, Lessee expressly agrees that all improvements or construction work shall be built or performed in strict compliance with the terms of the permit and approval granted, that construction shall commence within six (6) months following the date of the permit, and that all construction shall be completed within one (1) year of the date of the permit.

k. Lessee may request from the Council a variance or deviation from any term or condition contained herein.

l. The Council, prior to granting any extension of an existing lease or a new lease covering the leased premises shall have the right to review the leased premises and improvements thereon and submit in writing to the Lessee the requirements, if any, which shall attach to and become a part of this lease, necessary for compliance with the above-mentioned provisions of the Code. Failure of the Lessee to abide by and comply with said requirements may be deemd a default at the option of Lessor.

RESERVATIONS AND EASEMENTS

5.2 Lessor, its agents or assigns, reserves the privilege and right at any time to execute and deliver valid oil, gas and other mineral leases upon the leased premises, and valid right-of-way easements for gas, oil, water, or wastewater pipelines, telephone, telegraph or electric pole transmission lines on said premises, or any part thereof, and in such event this lease shall be subject and subordinate to the rights, terms and privileges of any such oil, gas and other mineral leases or such easements as may have been executed heretofore or hereafter by Lessor, its agents or assigns. An easement across leased premises is hereby retained by Lessor for the purpose of laying sewer and water lines and/or for necessary rights-of-way for roads, alleys or other throughways.

VI. ENCUMBRANCE OF LEASEHOLD ESTATE

ENCUMBERING LEASEHOLD INTEREST ONLY

5

6.1 Lessee shall not have the right to encumber the fee simple, but Lessee may request Lessor's written consent (pursuant to article XII of this lease) to encumber the leasehold estate, personal property or improvements made by Lessee which may be removed from the realty without injury to the realty; provided however, that no mortgagee nor anyone who claims by, through or under such mortgage or deed of trust shall, by virtue of such mortgage or deed trust, acquire any greater or more extended rights than Lessee has under this lease but such mortgage or deed of trust shall be in every respect subject, subservient and subordinate to all of the conditions, provisions, requirements, covenants and obligations of this lease. The mortgagee under any such deed of trust or mortgage shall have the right to assume this lease and perform its terms and conditions to protect itself.

NOTICES TO LENDER 6.2 Any lender or mortgagee may notify Lessor in writing that a mortgage or deed of trust has been given and executed by Lessee and furnish Lessor with the address to which it desires copies of notices to be mailed. Lessor agrees to mail to lender or mortgagee or its designated agent or representative, at the address given, a copy of any notice which Lessor gives, mails, or serves on Lessee under the terms of this lease after receipt of such a notice from the lender or mortgagee.

VII. CONDITION OF PREMISES

NO WARRANTY

7.1 LESSOR GIVES NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE CONDITION OF THE LEASED PREMISES OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, INCLUDING WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE.

AVAILABILITY AND USE OF LAKE WATER 7.2 Lessor in no way guarantees the accessibility of water to the leased premises nor the level of water in Lake Nasworthy.

Lessee can use water from the lake, river, and/or wells on the premises for domestic purposes and water of existing trees and shrubs; but no water will be removed from the premises. Use of water for irrigation is expressly prohibited. Lessee shall use water in a conservative manner, and any abusive use of water shall be grounds for denying the use of water to the Lessee. Lessee shall pay the applicable water use charge as set by the Lessor, for water or raw water usage, as the case may be.

VIII. REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE

LESSEE'S DUTY TO REPAIR AND MAINTAIN

6

8.1 Lessee agrees to keep and maintain any and all structures erected or caused to be erected or placed on the leased premises in good and tenantable condition, to maintain its appearance, and to landscape and keep said premises cleared of all objectionable matter, things, and vegetation. Leased premises shall not be used for the outside storage of usable materials for unreasonable lengths of time. In the event Lessee shall fail to maintain leased premises in a manner acceptable to Lessor, after notice to Lessee as prescribed by city ordinance, the Lessor shall cause leased premises to be cleaned, cleared, and mowed. Lessee expressly authorizes the cost of any such clearing, cleaning, and mowing to be billed to it or added to the next annual rental payment, with interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum beginning thirty (30) days from the date on which the work was completed, and continuing until such cost is paid in full.

DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION 8.2 The parties hereto acknowledge that the leased premises are within an area subject to overflow and flooding and it is expressly agreed between the parties that neither Lessor nor any of its agents or employees shall be liable to Lessee for any damages caused in any manner, negligent or otherwise, by high water or floods at Lake Nasworthy, nor by the rivers or creeks which serve as its sources of supply or diversion channels, nor by reason of any work deemed necessary in Lessor's sole judgment in the maintenance of said Lake and sources of supply or diversion channels and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived, and when Lessor (or any agent thereof) deems it necessary to enter on the leased premises for any of the above purposes, its judgment shall be conclusive.

IX. SUSPENSION OF PRIVILEGES

HEALTH MATTERS 9.1 It is expressly understood and agreed that Lessor may at any time, without notice to Lessee or any mortgagee, suspend or revoke any and all privileges granted herein for such length of time as in its sole judgment is necessary for the purpose of suppressing or arresting an epidemic of any contagious or infectious disease, or when, in its sole judgment, any suspension of privileges is necessary to protect the health of the water consumers of San Angelo, Texas. In the event privileges are suspended by Lessor, rent shall be prorated; and if the lease is revoked, Lessor shall pay Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvements hereto made or erected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease.

PUBLIC PURPOSES

9.2 If Lessor shall deem that leased premises are required for any public purpose or that condemnation is necessary, Lessor shall have the right to terminate this lease by giving ninety (90) days written notice of such termination to Lessee and any mortgagee who has notified the Water Utilities Department of its lien and its address for notice purposes; and Lessee agrees to promptly deliver possession of leased premises to Lessor; and this lease shall terminate upon the expiration of ninety (90)days after the date of such notice; and in such event Lessor shall pay

7

Lessee an amount equal to the market value of any structures or improvements hereto made or erected on leased premises in compliance with the terms of this lease.

X. RELEASE 10.1 Lessee expressly releases Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims for damages of any kind by reason of the condition of the premises hereby leased, or any improvements thereon or any damages incurred in the enjoyment or exercise of the privileges granted hereunder, or for damage to its person or property caused by the opening of the gates at Nasworthy Dam, the lowering of the normal water elevation in the lake, or due to flood or high water, or any fluctuating water levels which may arise in the use and operation of Lake Nasworthy, or in the joint use and operation of Lake Nasworthy, San Angelo Reservoir, and Twin Buttes Reservoir for the purposes of recreation, irrigation, and water supply, or for any other purpose.

XI. INDEMNIFICATION 11.1 LESSEE FURTHER AGREES FOR LESSEE AND LESSEE’SSUCCESORS IN INTEREST TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD LESSOR, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES, FREE AND HARMLESS FROM ANY CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OR INJURY, INCLUDING DEATH, TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY, OR ANY LIABILITY INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE EXERCISE OF THE PRIVILEGES CONFERRED BY THIS LEASE, AND AGREES TO REIMBURSE LESSOR FOR ANY EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE DEFENSE OF ANY SUCH CLAIM, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COURT COSTS ACTUALLY INCURRED. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL REQUIRE THE INDEMNIFYING PARTY TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND OR HOLDHARMLESS ANY INDEMNIFIED PARTY FOR THE INDEMNIFIED PARTY’S OWN GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT. THIS INDEMNIFICATION SHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OF THIS LEASE AS LONG AS ANY LIABILITY COULD BE ASSERTED.

XII. TRANSFER, ASSIGNMENT, AND SUBLETTING 12.1 Lessee may not transfer or assign the leased premises, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the Lessor, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Lessee may not sublet the leased premises, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the Lessor. Any such transfer, assignment or sublease shall be evidenced in writing, properly executed and acknowledged by both parties thereto; a copy shall be delivered to Lessor and the original shall be recorded in the office of the County Clerk of Tom Green County, Texas. It is agreed, however, that each such transfer, assignment or sublease shall bind the transferee, assignee or sublessee to the obligations of Lessee to Lessor as set forth in this lease and shall not release Lessee from Lessee's obligations under the lease.

XIII. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES

DEFAULT

8

13.1 (a) Any breach of this lease by Lessee, other than the non-payment of rent, may result in irreparable damage to Lessor for which Lessor will not have an adequate remedy at law. If Lessee should default with respect to any of its obligations hereunder except with respect to the non-payment of rent, and should fail within 60 days after written notice of such default from the Lessor to cure such default, then Lessee agrees that that Lessor shall be entitled to immediately seek relief by action or proceeding at law for damages, for specific performance and injunction, without any requirement to post a bond or other security.

(b) In addition to, and independent of, the provisions of subsection (a), above, should Lessee violate any provision of this Lease, other than the non-payment of rent, and fail or refuse to cure such violation within 60 days after written notice of such default from Lessor, then Lessor or Lessor’s agents may enter the premises as reasonably necessary to perform the work required as determined by Lessor to cure the default and the costs thereof shall be deemed to be additional rent, immediately due and payable upon written notice to Lessee of the sum of expenses, costs, and fees so incurred by Lessor, including an assessment for the cost related to Lessor’s employee time in curing the default, if any. LESSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANY CLAIM FOR TRESSPASS OR DAMAGES RELATING TO LESSOR OR LESSOR’S AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES ENTRY ONTO THE LEASEHOLD PREMISES PURSUANT TO THE PROVSIONS OF THIS LEASE. (c) A breach of this lease by Lessee for non-payment of rent shall result in termination of this lease should Lessee within 60 days after written notice of default setting forth the amount past due fail to cure such default by making payment of the full amount due Lessor.

POSSESSION 13.2 Lessee agrees at the termination of this lease to deliver possession peacefully to the Lessor or its agents or employees; and if it fails to give peaceful possession, Lessor may take forceful possession of said premises and eject all parties therefrom without being guilty of trespass; and all damages occasioned thereby are hereby waived.

REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS 13.3 All buildings and other improvements placed on the property by Lessee (except trees, shrubs, flowers and plants) which may be removed without injury to the realty shall remain the property of Lessee. It is understood and agreed, however, that buildings and improvements shall be held by the Lessor until all rentals due Lessor by Lessee shall have been paid, and should any amount remain unpaid for more than thirty (30) days after termination of this lease, the Lessor shall have the right to sell such buildings and improvements and apply the proceeds to the amount due Lessor, with interest at the annual rate of ten percent (10%), and to any costs incident to the sale, and pay the balance remaining, if any, to Lessee. All property remaining on the premises after the expiration of ninety (90) days following the termination of this lease, however terminated, shall be deemed abandoned by Lessee and shall become the property of Lessor.

9

OTHER REMEDIES 13.4 (a) Any termination of this lease shall not relieve Lessee from the payment of any sum or sums that are due and payable to Lessor under the lease, or any claim for damages then or previously accruing against Lessee under this lease, and any such termination shall not prevent Lessor from enforcing the payment of any such sum or sums or claim for damages by any remedy provided for by law, or from recovering damages from Lessee for any default under the lease. All rights, options, and remedies of Lessor contained in this lease shall be construed and held to be cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of the other, and Lessor shall have the right to pursue any one or all of such remedies or any other remedy or relief which may be provided by law, whether or not stated in this lease. No waiver by Lessor of a breach of any of the covenants, conditions, or restrictions of this lease shall be construed or held to be a waiver of any succeeding or preceding breach of the same or any other covenant, condition, or restriction contained in this lease. (b) The remedies provided herein shall not be exclusive of other remedies. A failure by the Lessor to take action on any past violation shall not constitute a waiver of the Lessor’s right to take action on any subsequent violation.

XIV. MISCELLANEOUS

RELATIONSHIP OF LESSOR AND LESSEE

14.1 The relationship between Lessor and Lessee at all times shall remain solely that of landlord and tenant and shall not be deemed a partnership or joint venture.

PARTIES BOUND

14.2 This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties of the lease and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns.

HEADINGS

14.3 The paragraph headings contained herein are for convenience and reference and are not intended to define, extend or limit the scope of any provisions of this lease.

SUPERSEDES PRIOR AGREEMENTS 14.4 If this lease replaces another lease, all prior agreements are superseded by this lease.

ENTIRE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENTS

14.5 This lease constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and Lessor is not bound by any agreement, condition or stipulation, understanding or representation made by any of

10

Lessor’s agents not contained herein. No amendment to this lease shall be effective unless such is in writing and signed by both parties.

VIOLATIONS OF LEASE 14.6 IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT THE VIOLATION OF ANY TERM, STIPULATION, CONDITION, OR COVENANT, SHALL ENTITLE THE LESSOR, AT ITS OPTION, TO TERMINATE THIS LEASE. FAILURE TO EXERCISE SUCH OPTION AT ANY TIME SHALL NEVER BE CONSTRUED AS A WAIVER OF ANY CONDITION OF THIS LEASE.

TEXAS LAW TO APPLY 14.7 The parties hereby agree that Texas law will control the interpretation or enforcement of this lease. This lease has been executed in Texas, and all obligations hereunder are performable in Tom Green County, Texas.

INVALID OR ILLEGAL PROVISIONS 14.8 If any provision of this lease is held invalid as to any person or set of circumstances, such holding shall not affect the validity of any remaining provision of this lease or any provision’s application to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances.

REIMBURSEMENT OF LESSOR’S EXPENSES

14.9 Lessee shall pay on demand all of Lessor’s expenses including, but not limited to, attorney’s fees and court costs incurred in enforcing any of Lessee’s obligations under this lease, which include, but are not limited to, collection of rental fees and collection of utility payments, taxes and other legitimate assessments.

NOTICES 14.9 All notices concerning this lease shall be in writing and delivered to the parties at the addresses below:

LESSEE: David and Kerry Persely 6678 Knickerbocker Road San Angelo, Texas 76904 LESSOR: City of San Angelo

Attn: Water Utilities Director 72 W. College Avenue San Angelo, Texas 76903

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]

11

EXECUTED in duplicate originals on the _____day of _____________________, 2013

by: LESSEE

David Persely Kerry Persely

STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §

This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________, 2013 by David and Kerry Persely.

Notary Public, State of Texas

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, LESSOR

BY: RICKY DICKSON Water Utilities Department

STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TOM GREEN §

This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _____day of ________________,

2012, by Ricky Dickson, Interim Director of Water Utilities of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation.

Notary Public, State of Texas


City of San Angelo

Memo Date: March 4, 2013


From: Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator (657-4407)


Contact: Diana Farris, Property Specialist (657-4407)

Caption: Consent Item

Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment:

1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street, (Gonzalez), Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale, $1,000, Suit No.B99-0081-T

207 E Avenue L, (Perez), E 50’ x 238’ of a 1 acre Tract, Fisher Miller, $750, Suit No.TAX89-0388B

725 Hughes Street, (Salinas), Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell, $950, Suit No. B-03-0087-T

816 Volney, (Salinas) Portion of Lots 6-8, Block 28, Miles, 1,500, Suit No. B-05-0192-T

111 E 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 7, Block 57, Miles, ($1,200) Suit No. B-97-0170-T

329 13th Street, (Salinas), Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, $750, Suit No.TAX90-0083B

1916 Shelton, (Sanchez), S ½ of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres, $2,500, Suit No.B-00-0043-T

Summary: The subject properties were auctioned at Sheriff’s Sale. No offers were received causing subject properties to be stuck-off to the City, as Trustee for itself and the other taxing entities.

History: The attached Property Analysis reflects amounts of delinquent taxes, accrued penalties, interest, attorney fees and costs for delinquent years of, together with additional penalties and interest at the rates prescribed by Chapter 33, Texas Property Tax Code.

Financial Impact: Upon approval: (1) The City will retain a $500 Administration fee; (2) The balance will be distributed according to the judgment on the Sheriff’s Return; and (3) Property will be reinstated back onto tax roll.

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

Financial Vision – Examine liquidation of unused or underperforming city-owned properties

Neighborhood Vision – Attract reinvestment


Staff recommends approval.

Attachments: Property Analysis, Resolution, Tax-Resale Deed and Property Location Map

Presentation: N/A

Publication: N/A


Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Approved by Legal:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A TAX-RESALE (QUITCLAIM) DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, AND ALL OTHER TAXING UNITS INTERESTED IN THE TAX FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, by Sheriff’s Sale, the properties described below were struck-off to the City of San Angelo, Trustee, pursuant to delinquent tax foreclosure decrees of the 119th and 340th Judicial Districts, Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, offers have been made for the purchase of said properties pursuant to Section 34.05, Texas Tax Code Ann.(Vernon, 1982); and

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO that its Mayor, Alvin New, is hereby authorized to execute a Tax-Resale (quitclaim) Deed conveying the following described real properties to the following as specified below, all of the right, title, and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment, located in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas: Conveying to: CARLOS GONZALEZ, a single person; ($1,000):

Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #02-12400-0002-001-00

#02-12400-0002-002-00 GILBERT PEREZ, JR., a single person; ($750):

The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract described in Volume 39, Page 621, Deed Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page 196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #38-00205-0013-000-00

RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($1,200):

Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #07-19800-0002-008-00


Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #19-34200-0057-007-00


A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. To George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #18-34200-0028-009-00

RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property; ($750):

Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page 235, Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas. Account #21-38600-0002-002-00

MARIA ROSA SANCHEZ, a single person, and LILLIANA SANCHEZ, a single person; ($2,500):

The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #15-28100-0003-029-00

APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2013.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

_______________________________ Alvin New, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form: ______________________________ ______________________________ Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Legal Description:

Improved/Unimproved

Tax Suit Number:

Location:

Parcel Size/Dimensions:

City of San Angelo vs.

Tax ID Number:

Tax Warrant Date:

Date of Sheriff's Sale:

Sheriff's Deed Recorded:

13 YRS

Adjudge Value: 1,800.00$ No

Amount of Offer: 1,000.00$

Amounts Due Priority % of Pro Rata Amounts

Fees Judgment Allocations Remainder Allocations Distributed

Administration Fee $500.00 $500.00 0.00% $500.00

Maintenance Fee 1,820.00$ 100.00% 500.00$ 500.00$

District Clerk -$ 0.00% -$

Sheriff's Fee -$ 0.00% -$

Attorney Fee -$ 0.00% -$

Municipal Liens -$ $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Taxes -$ $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Total $2,320.00 -$ $500.00 100.00% 500.00$ $1,000.00

Actual Total Amt Due $2,320.00

Amount Remaining 500.00$

All costs according to the Tax Warrant have been perviously paid. Offer will satisfy a portion of the Maintenance costs.

Purchased under Urban Redevelopment

PROPERTY ANALYSISFor Tax Resale Property

Years Held in Trust

January 6, 2000

1944 & 1948 Magnolia Street

B99-0081-T

Unimproved

Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County,

Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat

Records of Tom Green County, Texas.

December 7, 1999

October 26, 1999

#02-12400-0002-001-00 #02-12400-0002-002-00

J.F. Kite, Addie Kite, Mrs. N.E. Hicks Account #1391

50' x 130'

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY RIGHTS: If you are a natural person, you may remove or strike any or all of the following information from this instrument before it is filed for record in the public records: your social security number or your driver’s license number.

Tax-Resale Deed

(Property Sold for Less than Adjudged Value) Date: __________________________ Grantor: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee

for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: CARLOS GONZALEZ, a single person

725 Amberton Parkway San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901

Consideration: Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration Property (including any improvements):

Lots 1 & 2, Block 2, Avondale Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof, recorded in Volume 1, Page 86, Plat Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #02-12400-0002-001-00 #02-12400-0002-002-00

Tax Warrant: Tax Warrant for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on October 26, 1999

in Suit No. B-99-0081-T by the 340th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for

all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Tax Warrant — by Sheriff’s Deed dated January 5, 2000, and recorded in Volume 751, Page 622, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.

For the Consideration, Grantor — acting by and through its Mayor, who has been duly authorized to

execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Tax Warrant, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded.

Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in

which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.

Grantor is selling the Property to Grantee for an amount that is less than the lesser of (1) the market

value specified in the Judgment, or (2) the total amount of the Judgment.

Grantee assumes full payment of any ad valorem taxes for the Property for the current year and all future years.

When the context requires, singular nouns and pronouns include the plural.

GRANTOR: The City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, for itself and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment

ATTEST: By: ____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor and

duly-authorized agent Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TOM GREEN § This instrument was acknowledged before me on _____________________, 2013, by Alvin New, Mayor and duly-authorized agent of the City of San Angelo, a Texas home-rule municipal corporation, on behalf of such corporation and as Trustee for any taxing authorities named in the Judgment identified in the above instrument. __________________________________ Notary Public, State of Texas After Recording, Return To:

E 50' x 238' of a 1 acre tract, Fisher & Miller

Addition207 E Avenue L 50' x 238'

Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Tue Dec 20 2011 04:46:45 PM.

Legal Description:

Improved/Unimproved

Tax Suit Number:

Location:



Tax ID Number:

Judgment Date:



18 YRS


Amount of Offer: 750.00$




Maintenance Fee 0.00% -$

District Clerk 131.00$ 21.84% 54.59$ 54.59$

Sheriff's Fee 156.93$ 26.16% 65.40$ 65.40$

Attorney Fee 311.98$ 52.00% 130.01$ 130.01$

Municipal Liens -$ $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Taxes -$ $3,775.09 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Total $500.00 $3,775.09 $500.00 100.00% 250.00$ $750.00

Actual Total Amt Due $4,275.09 599.91$


Offer will satisfy all costs according to the Judgment.



Years Held in Trust

October 25, 1995

207 E Avenue L

TAX89-0388b

Unimproved

The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract out of Fisher & Miller, described in Volume

39, Page 621, Deed Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page

196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas.

August 1, 1995

October 14, 1992

#38-00205-0013-000-00

Balente Martinez a/k/a Valente Martinez Account #1448

50' x 238'


Tax-Resale Deed


for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: GILBERT PEREZ, JR, a single person

712 Era Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76905


The East 50’ x 238’ of a 1.00 acre Tract described in Volume 39, Page 621, Deed Records, said East 50’ being described in Volume 361, Page 196, Deed of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #38-00205-0013-000-00

Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on October 14, 1992 in

Suit No. TAX89-0388-B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for

all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated September 20, 1995, and recorded in Volume 502, Page 55, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.


execute this instrument on Grantor’s behalf by resolution and order of Grantor’s City Council recorded in the City Council’s official minutes — hereby quitclaims to Grantee all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the Property, to have and to hold it to Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. Neither Grantor, nor any other taxing unit interested in the Judgment, nor any other person or entity claiming under them, will have, claim, or demand any right or title to the Property or any part of it. Grantor gives this Tax-Resale Deed without any express or implied warranty whatsoever; and all warranties that might arise by common law and the warranties in § 5.023 of the Texas Property Code (or its successor) are hereby specifically excluded.

Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was

not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.








725 Hughes Street, Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition 60' x 115'

Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, NAVTEQ, DeLorme

Zip Codes

City Address Points

Pending City Addresses

March 5, 20130 0.02 0.040.01 mi

0 0.035 0.070.0175 km

1:1,349

Legal Description:

Improved/Unimproved

Tax Suit Number:

Location:



Tax ID Number:

Judgment Date:



7 YRS






Maintenance Fee 980.00$ 0.00% -$

District Clerk $236.00 $236.00 0.00% $236.00

Sheriff's Fee $100.00 $100.00 0.00% $100.00

Attorney Fee $332.00 $332.00 0.00% $332.00

Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Taxes $1,778.00 100.00% $32.00 $32.00

Total $2,148.00 1,778.00$ $1,168.00 100.00% 32.00$ $1,200.00



Offer will satisfy all court costs and a small portion of the Taxes.



Years Held in Trust

April 11, 2006

725 Hughes Street

B-03-0087-T

Unimproved

Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as

described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green

County, Texas.

April 4, 2006

January 18, 2005

#07-19800-0002-008-00

John D. Northcutt Account #6883

52' x 86'


Tax-Resale Deed


for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: RICHARD SALINAS, a married person as his sole and separate property

2107 Greenwood San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76901


Lot 9, Block 2, Culwell Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed recorded in Volume 648, Page 622, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #07-19800-0002-008-00

Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on January 18, 2005 in

Suit No. B-03-0087-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for

all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated April 11, 2006, and recorded in Instrument Number 609008, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.



Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in

which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.








816 Volney Street, A Portion of Lots 6,7 & 8 , Block 28, Miles Addition 40' x 120'


City Address Points


Retired City Addresses

County Address Points

Pending County Addresses

Retired County Addresses

Parcels

Platted Lot Line Labels

Platted Lot Lines

Abandonments Approved

Abandonments Denied

Abandonments Expired

March 5, 20130 0.045 0.090.0225 mi

0 0.07 0.140.035 km

1:2,699

Legal Description:

Improved/Unimproved

Tax Suit Number:

Location:



Tax ID Number:

Judgment Date:



4 YRS






Maintenance Fee 560.00$ $0.00 100.00% 402.00$ 402.00$

District Clerk 533.00$ 533.00$ 0.00% $533.00

Sheriff's Fee 100.00$ 100.00$ 0.00% $100.00

Attorney Fee 365.00$ 365.00$ 0.00% $365.00

Municipal Liens $981.22 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Taxes $6,101.42 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Total $1,060.00 8,080.64$ $1,498.00 100.00% 402.00$ $1,900.00



Offer will satisfy all court cost according to the Judgment.



Years Held in Trust

November 23, 2009

816 Volney Street

B-05-0192-T

Unimproved

A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San

Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from

Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. to George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583,

Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas.

November 3, 2009

August 7, 2009

#18-34200-0028-009-00

Joseph Jones Acct-Unknown Lula B. Jones Acct #3835 Sylvia A. Jenkins Acct #1365

40' x 120'


Tax-Resale Deed





A portion of Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Miles Addition, an addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in deed dated March 20, 1974 from Donald Nelson Holley, et ux. To George Jones, Sr., et ux., in Volume 611, Page 583, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #18-34200-0028-009-00

Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on August 7, 2009 in Suit No. B-05-0192-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas.

Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for

all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated November 20, 2009, and recorded in Instrument Number 678726, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.



Grantee's rights under this deed are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the Texas Tax Code, including, without limitation, any right of redemption remaining in the former owner of the Property; the terms

of any recorded restrictive covenants running with the land that were recorded before January 1 of the year in which the tax lien on the property arose; any recorded lien that arose under such restrictive covenants that was not extinguished in the judgment foreclosing the tax lien; and each valid easement of record as of the date of the sale that was recorded before January 1 of the year the tax lien arose.








111 E 13th Street, Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition 50' x 100'


Zip Codes

City Address Points


March 5, 20130 0.02 0.040.01 mi

0 0.035 0.070.0175 km

1:1,349

Legal Description:

Improved/Unimproved

Tax Suit Number:

Location:



Tax ID Number:

Judgment Date:



11 YRS






Maintenance Fee 1,540.00$ $0.00 100.00% 317.00$ 317.00$

District Clerk 103.00$ 103.00$ 0.00% $103.00

Sheriff's Fee 40.00$ 40.00$ 0.00% $40.00

Attorney Fee 240.00$ 240.00$ 0.00% $240.00

Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Taxes $3,298.48 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Total $2,040.00 3,681.48$ $883.00 100.00% 317.00$ $1,200.00



Offer will satisfy all court cost according to the Judgment.



Years Held in Trust

March 25, 2002

111 E 13th Street

B-97-0170-T

Unimproved

Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as

described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas.

March 5, 2002

July 7, 1999

#19-34200-0057-007-00

Frank B. Snodgrass, Jr. Account #1692

50' x 100'


Tax-Resale Deed





Lot 7, Block 57, Miles Addition to the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 85, Page 576, Deed Records, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #19-34200-0057-007-00

Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on July 7, 1999 in Suit

No. B-97-0170-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for

all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated March 25, 2002, and recorded in Volume 902, Page 534, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.












Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place Addition329 E 13th St 52' x 86'

Copyright 2011 Esri. All rights reserved. Thu Dec 22 2011 09:08:38 AM.

Legal Description:

Improved/Unimproved

Tax Suit Number:

Location:



Tax ID Number:

Judgment Date:



16 YRS


Amount of Offer: 750.00$




Maintenance Fee 2,240.00$ $0.00 100.00% 250.00$ 250.00$

District Clerk $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00

Sheriff's Fee $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00

Attorney Fee $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00

Municipal Liens $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Taxes $0.00 0.00% $0.00 $0.00

Total $2,740.00 -$ $500.00 100.00% 250.00$ $750.00



Offer will satisfy a portion of the fees. No costs are due.



Years Held in Trust

February 21, 1997

329 13th Street

TAX90-0083B

Unimproved

Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page

235, Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas.

February 4, 1997

June 16, 1993

21-38600-0002-002-00

Roy L. Mayo Account #918

52' x 86'


Tax-Resale Deed





Lot 2, Block 2, Pecan Place, being more particularly described in Volume 251, Page 235, Deed Records of Tom Green, Texas. Account #21-38600-0002-002-00

Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on June 16, 1993 in

Suit No. TAX90-0083B by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for

all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated February 17, 1997, and recorded in Volume 570, Page 84, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.












1916 Shleton St. S 1/2 of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres 87' x 250'


City Address Points


Retired City Addresses

County Address Points

Pending County Addresses

Retired County Addresses

Platted Lot Line Labels

Platted Lot Lines

World Boundaries and Places

City Parcel Popups Transparent

March 7, 20130 0.045 0.090.0225 mi

0 0.07 0.140.035 km

1:2,699

Legal Description:

Improved/Unimproved

Tax Suit Number:

Location:



Tax ID Number:

Judgment Date:



1 YR






Maintenance Fee 350.00$ 0.00% -$

District Clerk $34.00 $34.00 0.00% -$ -$

Sheriff's Fee $100.00 $100.00 0.00% -$ -$

Attorney Fee $208.00 $208.00 0.00% -$ -$

Municipal Liens -$ $794.06 10.82% $141.50 $141.50

Taxes -$ $6,546.19 89.18% $1,166.50 $1,166.50

Total $1,192.00 $7,340.25 $842.00 100.00% 1,308.00$ $1,808.00


Amount Remaining 1,308.00$

Offer will satisfy all court costs and a small portion of the taxes and liens.



Years Held in Trust

November 17, 2011

1916 Shelton

B-00-0043-T

Unimproved

The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo,

Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of

Tom Green County, Texas.

November 1, 2011

January 6, 2004

#15-28100-0003-029-00

Eddie May Brown Account #5610 and R.J. Brown Account #8515

87' x 250'


Tax-Resale Deed


for itself, Tom Green County, and San Angelo Independent School District 72 West College Avenue San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903 Grantee: MARIA ROSA SANCHEZ, a single person and LILLIANA SANCHEZ, a single person

718 W 19th Street San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas 76903


The South one-half of Lot 12, Block 3, Home Acres Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 288, Page 55, Deed Records of Tom Green County, Texas. Account #15-28100-0003-029-00

Judgment: Judgment for the foreclosure of a tax lien against the Property entered on January 6, 2004 in

Suit No. B-00-0043-T by the 119th District Court of Tom Green County, Texas. Sheriff’s Deed: Grantor acquired full legal title to the Property — both for its own benefit and as Trustee for

all other taxing authorities entitled to receive proceeds from the sale of the Property under the terms of the Judgment — by Sheriff’s Deed dated November 17, 2011, and recorded in Instrument 710996, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas.












City of San Angelo



From: Michael Dane, ACM/CFO


Contact: Morgan Trainer, Budget, 325-653-6291

Caption: Consent Agenda

Consideration of adoption of a resolution allowing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau allocating Hotel Occupancy Tax funds.

Summary: City staff is requesting the City Council consider adopting a resolution allowing staff to continue negotiating terms of the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau contract for use of hotel occupancy tax dollars. Due to San Angelo’s changing economy and positive hotel occupancy tax experience, it is prudent to change existing methodology to provide the best value to the citizens of San Angelo.

History: The City of San Angelo levied the hotel occupancy tax for the operation of convention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts. Current contracts and ordinances allocate 48% of tax receipts to City of San Angelo Civic Events, 47% to the Convention & Visitors Bureau, and the remaining 5% to the San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council. The current tax rate is 7% for the City of San Angelo. The state levies an additional 6%. No change is proposed to the tax levy.

On February 5, 2013 City Council discussed changing the Hotel Occupancy Tax allocation process. On March 5, 2013 staff presented a draft contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau to revise the way Hotel Occupancy Tax dollars are disbursed to include clear communication, performance benchmarks, demonstrate the value added, and allow the City Council to shape the entity’s activity.

Financial Impact: The current budget for the Convention & Visitors Bureau contract is $693,250. The proposed contract would allocate $795,000 to the Convention & Visitors Bureau. Though this would require an increase to the budget of $101,750, this proposed allocation is less than last year’s transfer of $1,003,034.18. Though a budget amendment is required, there is ample funding available based on year to date trend to fund this contract with hotel occupancy tax.

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

Financial Vision


Staff recommends approval of the resolution

Attachments: Proposed Convention & Visitors Bureau contract and Resolution

Presentation: None

Publication: None


Michael Dane, Finance, 3/6/2013

Approved by Legal: Pending

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU ALLOCATING HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUNDS

WHEREAS, the State of Texas allows local governments to levy a hotel occupancy tax to enhance and promote tourism, to construct and maintain convention center facilities, to encourage the arts, for historical restoration, and for expenses for sporting events; and WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo has levied such a tax at the rate of 7% for the operation of convention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts; and

WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau is the City’s agent to promote tourism; and

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO that its City Manager Daniel Valenzuela or his designee is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute a contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau allocating hotel occupancy tax funds: APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2013.


_______________________________ Alvin New, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form: ______________________________ ______________________________ Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

INCOME:

Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts 795,000.00

Interest Income 350.00

Other Income/Visitor Center Sales 8,000.00

Community Events 0.00

Travel Cookbooks Income 0.00

TOTAL INCOME $803,350.00

OPERATING EXPENSES:

Extra Help/Part Time 17,500.00

Administrative Salaries 197,887.00

Social Security 11,800.00

Bookkeeping/Administration 17,000.00

Medicare 2,700.00

Employee Retirement 10,600.00

Unemployment Comp 600.00

Group Insurance 29,150.00

Audit/Legal 2,600.00

Facility Agreement 6,000.00

Rent/Storage Bldg. 1,000.00

Equipment Expense 18,000.00

Insurance 4,680.00

Postage 2,400.00

Telephone 7,000.00

Office Supplies 6,500.00

Automobile 19,000.00

Miscellaneous Office Support 2,000.00

Maintenance 11,600.00

Security 2,000.00

Utilities 14,000.00

Computers/Database Support 5,000.00

Christmas Lights Expense 1,750.00

Cornerstone Expense 200.00

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 390,967.00

CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 2013 BUDGET

Exhibit "A"

MARKETING/ADVERTISING

Professional Dues 7,000.00

Pro Training/Conferences 4,500.00

Subscriptions 5,000.00

Advertising/publicity 185,000.00

Volunteer Programs 2,400.00

Public Relations 5,000.00

Convention Servicing/Supplies 27,000.00

Promotional Items 11,500.00

Visitors & Travel Marketing 29,575.00

Convention & Travel Trade 48,000.00

Postage/marketing 3,500.00

800 Number (telephone) 400.00

Trade Shows 23,000.00

Visitor Center Merchandise 6,000.00

Brochure Development/Printing 12,000.00

Visitor Event Incentive 40,000.00

CVB Website 2,500.00

TOTAL MARKETING/ADV 412,375.00

TOTAL EXPENSES 803,342.00

SURPLUS (DEFICIT) 8.00

City of San Angelo Office of the City Clerk



From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk


Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405


Consideration of adopting a Resolution appointing election officials for the election to be held on May 11, 2013; and providing for an effective date

Summary: The Resolution appointing election officials, judges and alternates for the General/Special Election is a routine action required by the Election Code. In the majority of the polling places, both the judges and alternates have previously served for City elections. In all polling places, either the judge or alternate has experience in serving for elections. In addition, State Law requires the presiding judge of an election precinct to make reasonable efforts to appoint a sufficient number of election clerks who are fluent in both English and Spanish to serve the needs of the Spanish-speaking voters of the precinct, if five percent (5%) or more of the inhabitants are persons of Spanish origin or descent. Most precincts will include two (2) election clerks. In accordance with the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green County Elections Administrator previously approved by the Council, the list of judges and alternates is provided by the Elections Administrator and is responsible for ensuring reasonable efforts to serve Spanish-speaking voters.

Financial Impact: The expense of the Election is shared on a pro rata basis with the Independent School Districts in San Angelo, Grape Creek, Wall, and Veribest. The estimated total cost for a city-wide election at $30,000.00 to $40,000.00 and we are anticipating a Runoff Election for June 15, 2013..

Other Information/Recommendation: On the final two days of early voting by personal appearance, the Election Administrator’s office and branch location hours will be designated from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., beginning on May 6 and ending May 7, 2013.

Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution. The Resolution designating the polling locations and Contract for joint election services was authorized in December 6, 2011.

Attachments: Resolution appointing Election Judges

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, APPOINTING ELECTION OFFICIALS FOR THE ELECTION TO BE HELD ON MAY 11, 2013; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Ordinance #2013-02-??? calling for the

General Election on May 11, 2013; and WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo adopted Resolution #2013-03-??? designating polling places within the election precincts within the City of San Angelo, Texas for elections ordered; and

WHEREAS, the Texas Election Code Section 32.005 authorizes the City Council to appoint election judges for the designated polling places, within the election precincts within the City of San Angelo, Texas for elections ordered by the City; and

WHEREAS, by this Resolution, it is the intention of the City Council to appoint

election officials and judges to each early voting and election day polling place within the designated election precinct; and WHEREAS, the Election Services Contract with the Tom Green County Elections Administrator provides that the Administrator arrange for the use of the polling places and furnish a list of judges and Alternateernates for each polling place; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: SECTION 1: FINDINGS INCORPORATED. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ELECTION JUDGES AND ALTERNATEERNATES FOR THE CITY’S ELECTION PRECINCTS FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION TO HELD ON MAY 11, 2013: The election judges and Alternateernates assigned to the designated election precincts within the City, as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes.

SECTION 3: FURTHER DESIGNATION: The City further authorizes the City Clerk to appoint substitute election judges in the event the individuals appointed herein are unable to fulfill their duties.

SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultation with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary to comply with the provisions of the Code, the Texas Election Code and any other state or federal law in carrying out and designating polling placing, whether or not expressly authorized herein and all actions previously taken are hereby ratified.

SECTION 5: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 19th day of March, 2013.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

___________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST: _______________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Exhibit “A”

DESIGNATION OF ELECTION JUDGES AND ALTERNATEERNATE JUDGES FOR DESIGNATED POLLING PLACES FOR MAY 11, 2013 GENERAL/SPECIAL ELECTION

ELECTION DAY POLLING LOCATIONS OPEN FROM 7:00 A.M. TO 7:00 P.M.

Election Day Dia de las Elecciones May 11, 2013, 7 am to 7 pm El 11 de mayo, 2013, desde las 7 hasta las 7

Voters in precincts 114, 137, and 144 vote at Belmore Baptist Church-Fellowship Hall, 1214 S. Bell St. Votantes en precintos 114, 137, y 144, votar en Belmore Baptist Church-Fellowship Hall, 1214 South Bell ELECTION JUDGE: David McMahon, Judge and Nelda Englert, Alternate Judge Voters in precincts 106, 107, 127, and 146 vote at Baptist Memorial Hospital, 902 N. Main, Chapel Votantes en precintos 106, 107, 124, y 146 votan en la capilla de Baptist Memorial Hospital, 902 Main al Norte. ELECTION JUDGE: Mark Gregory, Judge and Maggie Fernandez, Alternateernate Judge Voters in precinct 108 vote at Harriett Baptist Church, 7626 N US Hwy 67 Votantes en precinto 108 votan en Harriett Baptist Church, 7626 N US Hwy 67 ELECTION JUDGE: Noemi Hoelscher, Judge and Cruz Carol, Alternateernate Judge Voters in precincts 112 and 213 vote at St Ambrose Church, 8602 Loop 570, Wall, TX. Votantes en precintos 112 y 213 votan en St. Ambrose Church, 8602 Loop 570, Wall, TX. ELECTION JUDGE: Lloyd Moore, Judge and Charlene Dusek, Alternateernate Judge Voters in precincts 228, and 230 vote at Southgate Church of Christ, 528 Country Club Rd. Votantes dentro precintos 228, y 230 votan en Southgate Church of Christ, 528 Country Club Road. ELECTION JUDGE: Sid Clemmer, Judge and Carol Cahill, Alternateernate Judge Voters in precincts 215 and 241 vote at Texas Department of Transportation, 4502 Knickerbocker Rd., Bldg. E Votantes en precintos 215 y 241 votan en el Departamento de Transporte de Texas, 4502 Knickerbocker Road, Edificio "E". ELECTION JUDGE: Charlie Hafer, Judge and Sue Bramhall, Alternate Judge Voters in precincts 304, 306, and 348 vote at Lakeview Bible Church, 4825 Grape Creek Rd. Votantes en precintos 304, 306, y 348 votan en Lakeview Bible Church, 4825 Grape Creek Road ELECTION JUDGE: Gloria Mata, Judge and Aurora Rodriguez , Alternate Judge Voters in precincts 305, 308, 319, 327, and 351 vote at Ángelo Bible Church, 3506 Sherwood Way. Votantes en precintos 305, 308, 319, 327, y 351 votan en Ángelo Bible Church, 3506 Sherwood Way. ELECTION JUDGE: Sandi Smith, Judge and Charlene Corfield , Alternate Judge Voters in precinct 358 vote at Grape Creek ISD Admin. Building, 8207 US Hwy. 87 N. Votantes en precinto 358 votan en el DEI de Grape Creek en el edificio de Administración, 8207 US HWY 87, Norte. ELECTION JUDGE: Betty Lacy, Judge and Gena Franks, Alternate Judge Voters in precincts 402, 420, 421, and 424 vote at Plaza del Sol Apartments, 4359 Oak Grove Blvd. Votantes en precintos 402, 420, 421, y 424 votan en Plaza del Sol Apartments, 4359 Oak Grove Boulevard ELECTION JUDGE: John Graham, Judge and Mitch Krasny, Alternate Judge Voters in precincts 401, 434, 435, and 436 vote at MHMR Services, 1501 W. Beauregard Ave. Votantes en precintos 401, 434. 435 y 436 votan en Servicios de MHMR 1501 Beauregard, Oeste. ELECTION JUDGE: Ivey Mossell, Judge and Jim Jones, Alternate Judge Voters in precinct 423 vote at Knickerbocker Community Center, 14608 FM 2335, Knickerbocker, TX. Votantes en precinto 423 votan en Knickerbocker Community Center, 14608 FM 2335, Knickerbocker, TX. ELECTION JUDGE: Mary Page, Judge and Silvia Montalvo, Alternate Judge

Early Voting by personal appearance and mail, 113 W. Beauregard

Vona McKerley, Early Voting Clerk Alicia Ramirez, Deputy Early Voting Clerk Rudy Olivas, Deputy Early Voting Clerk Vanessa Simon, Deputy Early Voting Clerk Early Voting Ballot Board, 113 W. Beauregard Katherine Osborne, Chairperson CLERKS: Lenda Campbell, Stella Hodges, Connie DelaRosa, Anita Betty, Linda Martin, and Charlene Schmidt Central Counting Station and Manual Count, 113 W. Beauregard Alicia Ramirez, Presiding Judge Vona McKerley, Manager Rudy Olivas, Technical Supervisor CLERKS: John Stone, Barbara Stone, Kevin Burke, Gwenn Neill, Mike Granados, and Stephen Radloff TECHNICAL CLERKS: John Stone and Barbara Stone Tom Green County Sherriff, Security DOCK: Bob Boyles and Danny List Precinct Records and Voted Ballots Storage, 113 W. Beauregard Vona McKerley, Agent to General Custodian Alicia Ramirez, General Custodian of Special Election Records


City of San Angelo

Memo Date:


From: Carl White, Parks & Recreation Director


Contact: Carl White, 325-234-1724


Consideration of approving an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with the San Angelo Independent School District for the construction of improvements at the Bradford Elementary School Park and authorizing the Mayor or City Manager to execute the agreement.

Summary:

This agreement will authorize the construction of park amenities on the Bradford School property (vicinity 24th and Poe Streets in Northeast San Angelo) and document the relationship between the City and SAISD regarding this project and the availability of the improvements to the public as well as maintenance responsibilities.

History: There is no history on this item. Funds are available for park improvements and Council has directed staff to cooperate with SAISD to provide park amenities, where possible, on school property such that they can be used by the public and maintained by SAISD.

Financial Impact: The cost of the project is $175,000.00 from half-cent sales tax funds dedicated to Park Improvements.

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

Neighborhood Vision – provide adequate amenities for all neighborhoods.


Staff recommends approval.

Attachments: Proposed agreement and Resolution

Presentation: N/A

Publication: N/A


Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager

Approved by Legal: Yes

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (SAISD) PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY OF RECREATIONAL AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS, NOT TO EXCEED $175,000.00, FOR PUBLIC USE ON PROPERTY OWNED BY THE SAISD GENERALLY KNOWN AS BRADFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE SAISD

WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the interest of the citizens of the City of San Angelo for the City to cooperate with the San Angelo Independent School District (SAISD) for the joint use of resources to mutually provide park amenities open to the public ; and, WHEREAS, the Bradford Elementary School is located on N. Poe Street, between E. 22nd Street and E. 24th Street, and includes vacant land suitable for recreational and park amenities for public use; and, WHEREAS, the SAISD is agreeable to maintain park facilities proposed to be constructed on school district property by the City for public use under terms of an interlocal agreement, for a term of twenty-five years with option to renew for an additional twenty-five years, which use would be beneficial for the citizens of the City of San Angelo; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to execute an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement on behalf of the City of San Angelo with the San Angelo Independent School District effective for a term of twenty-five years with an option to renew for an additional twenty-five years, pursuant to which the City of San Angelo shall construct recreational and park improvements on certain property owned by the SAISD known as Bradford Elementary School, in a sum not to exceed One Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($175,000.00), for public use by the Citizens of San Angelo.. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2013. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Carl White, Parks & Recreation Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo

Memo Date:


From: Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney


Contact: Assistant City Manager Rick Weise, 657-4241


Consideration of A Resolution by the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, authorizing the City Manager to execute a First Amended Lease Agreement amending the original lease agreement between City of San Angelo and Howard County Junior College District, including extending the original lease term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises.

Summary/History: Since January of 2001, Howard County Junior College District and the City of San Angelo have operated a highly successful vocational training program commonly referred to as the West Texas Training Center (WTTC) located at the Howard College San Angelo Campus facility.

Due to its success, the Howard College San Angelo Campus facility has reached maximum enrollment and additional facilities are needed to better serve the citizens of San Angelo and surrounding areas. The identified needs are both vocational and academic programs and the expanded services will begin immediately upon construction. Preexisting educational services will continue without interruption.

For this reason, Howard County Junior College District requests the City of San Angelo approve the attached amendment to the original lease between the parties which provides for a fifty five (55) year lease term from the inception of the original lease term of September 1, 2008 and for one (1) renewal term of twenty five (25) years. This amended lease term will allow Howard County Junior College District to construct and maintain additional vocational and educational facilities for the benefit of the Howard College San Angelo campus and the San Angelo community as a whole. The improvements will be financed by revenue bonds to be repaid by student tuition and other fees. All costs of construction and maintenance will be assumed by Howard County Junior College District for the period of the lease. After the term of the lease and any renewal term expire, ownership of the facilities will transfer to City of San Angelo. The proposed facilities and improvements have been designed by the architectural firm of Parkhill Smith and Cooper Inc. employing the construction management at risk procurement and delivery method.

Financial Impact: Lessee bears cost for performance and obligations.

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

None.


Staff recommends the City Manager to execute the lease agreement.

Attachments: Resolution Lease Agreement

Presentation: None.

Publication: None.


None.

Approved by Legal: City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling, 3/12/13

A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FIRST AMENDED LEASE AGREEMENT AMENDING THE ORIGINAL LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND HOWARD COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT, INCLUDING EXTENDING THE ORIGINAL LEASE TERM AND PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MADE ON LEASED PREMISES.

WHEREAS, City and Howard County Junior College District entered into Lease Agreement ("Lease

Agreement") on August 19, 2008 for lease of 20.087 acres of land, to include the West Texas Training

Center located at 3501 N. US HWY 67, San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, for the operation and

maintenance of a technical training center for public education purposes;

WHEREAS, City and Lessee now desire to amend Lease Agreement and enter into First

Amended Lease Agreement to change certain provisions of Lease Agreement, including extending the

original lease term and providing for additional improvements to be made on leased premises;

WHEREAS, all of the terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement shall be and remain

in full force and effect unless amended or changed by the First Amended Lease Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:

The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the First Amended Lease Agreement on behalf of the

City of San Angelo and Howard County Junior College District amending the original Lease Agreement between

the parties dated August 19, 2008.

PASSED and APPROVED THIS _____ DAY OF _________ .~:, 2013.

ATTEST: CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Alvin New, Mayor

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM

Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: December 14, 2012

To: Mayor and Council members

From: City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling

Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013

Contact: Office of the City Attorney, 657-4405

Caption: Consent Agenda

Consideration of the adoption of a resolution endorsing certain legislative action in the Regular Session of the 83rd Legislature to enhance the competitive electric market and system reliability and to protect the traditional role of cities in the regulatory process..

Summary: The City of San Angelo is a member of the Texas Coalition for Affordable Power (TCAP). More than 160 cities and political subdivisions make up TCAP, which is one of the largest organizations of energy consumers in the State of Texas. TCAP, as part of its mission, monitors federal, state and local initiatives that may affect the price and availability of energy, and proactively promotes affordable energy policies which can impact municipal budgets and the ability to fund essential services

History: Historically, cities have formed coalitions to represent their collective interests before utility rate regulatory agencies and courts. By forming coalitions, cities have been able to present a strong voice for consumers for over thirty years. This has served to reduce costs that cities and their residents pay for electric and gas utility services. In numerous instances, without the participation of coalitions of cities, rate increases would have gone into effect without any party scrutinizing the utility’s application for rate increase. Participation in the coalition and adoption of the resolution endorsing legislative action to enhance the competitive electric market will demonstrate the mutual concern of the City of San Angelo with other city members of TCAP for reliability, quality of service, and price of electric utilities.

Financial Impact: The City of San Angelo is a member of TCAP. Support of the efforts of the coalition may result in maintaining favorable legislation accommodating the participation of Texas cities in the process for consideration of future utility applications for rate increases.

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

N/A


N/A Staff recommends adoption of the resolution.

Attachments: The proposed resolution is attached.

Presentation: N/A

Publication: N/A


City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling

Approved by Legal: 3/12/13

RESOLUTION NO. ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENDORSING CERTAIN LEGISLATIVE ACTION IN THE REGULAR SESSION OF THE 83RD TEXAS LEGISLATURE TO ENHANCE THE COMPETITIVE ELECTRIC MARKET AND SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND TO PROTECT THE TRADITIONAL ROLE OF CITIES IN THE REGULATORY PROCESS

WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo, Texas is a member of Texas Coalition for Affordable Power (“TCAP”), a non-profit political subdivision created by cities throughout Texas to secure affordable electric energy for its members in the deregulated electric market; and WHEREAS, TCAP pools the energy needs of its more than 160 political subdivision members to negotiate favorable prices and contract terms for the purchase of approximately 1.3 billion kilowatt hours annually; and WHEREAS, affordable and reliable power means economic development for the City and a better standard of living for our citizens; and WHEREAS, the City supports legislative initiatives that promote a healthy electric market where competition can flourish and electric customers can save money; and WHEREAS, the City endorses the legislative agenda of TCAP and opposes legislative initiatives that would fundamentally alter the ERCOT energy market or the traditional role of cities in the regulatory process. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, THAT: 1. The Regular Session of the 83rd Texas Legislature be encouraged to preserve the traditional role of cities in the regulatory process, including original jurisdiction and reimbursement of reasonable rate case expenses. 2. The Legislature make no statutory changes that would lead to a reduction in revenues paid by public utilities as franchise fees for rental of public rights-of-way. 3. The Legislature facilitate and encourage public/private partnerships between cities and electric generation developers in creating small-scale (not to exceed 50 MW) power plants capable of rapidly meeting peak power needs. 4. The Legislature recognize that “smart meters” are under-utilized with regard to encouraging and incentivizing reductions in energy consumption during peak periods and that the regulated transmission and distribution utilities which own the “smart meters” be allowed to re-enter the retail electric market to the extent they offer regulated rate plans designed to incent reductions in peak energy consumption. 5. The Legislature preclude foreign ownership of electric distribution assets and make it clear that, notwithstanding any other provision in law, home rule cities, individually or collectively, shall be permitted to own and operate electric distribution assets so long as said cities are not involved in retail sales of electricity.

6. The Legislature resist any efforts to transform the energy-only ERCOT market into a capacity market which would increase the price of electricity by artificially inflating generator profits. 7. The Legislature enhance protections against anti-competitive activities in the wholesale market and require the Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) to reform its rules related to Voluntary Mitigation Plans and allow cities and other interested parties to participate in review of such plans. 8. The Legislature mandate that the PUC and market participants provide consumer education regarding the relationship between time of use, cost of energy production and transmission, and the price paid by consumers. 9. The Legislature require the PUC to establish certain uniform products that must be offered by all retail electric providers (“REPs”) and to establish new rules governing the powertochoose.org and powertosavetexas.org websites that will better inform retail customers of complaints against REPs and better educate customers regarding the economic and market benefits of reducing demand during peak periods. 10. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. 11. A copy of this resolution shall be sent to the elected lawmakers representing the City’s interests in the Texas House and Senate and to Randolph C. Moravec, Executive Director of TCAP, 15455 Dallas Parkway, Addison, Texas 75001. PRESENTED AND PASSED on this ______ day of ____________, 2013 by a vote of ____ ayes

and ____ nays at a regular meeting of the City Council of San Angelo, Texas.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ____________________________________ Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Contact: Randolph (Randy) C. Moravec, PhD, Executive Director [email protected]•(972)742-7015

The Texas Coalition for Affordable Power Recommendations for a More Competitive Electric MarketBecause high energy costs can impact municipal budgets and the ability to fund essential services, TCAP, as part of its mission, actively promotes affordable energy policies. Affordable power in a fully competitive market also means economic development for our communities and a better life for our citizens. TCAP members are committed to making electric deregulation work.

Maintaining an even playing field for cities

Cities have a long history representing consumers in “regulated” rate cases. But big electric companies want to deter cities from exercising any opposition so they can more easily raise rates. TCAP will work hard at the Texas Legislature to protect city authority.

Fair Price for Electricity Produced at Home

Are rooftop solar panels installed in your community? TCAP supports legislation that will ensure that residential and small commercial customers that produce excess power at their homes or businesses receive a fair price for power they provide the grid.

Reduce Confusion in the Retail Electricity Market

Texansshouldhaveaccesstostandard-languageelectricitydeals.Thesedealswillenhancecompetitionbyfacilitatingapples-to-applespriceshopping.

Contact: Randolph (Randy) C. Moravec, PhD, Executive Director [email protected]•(972)742-7015

Avoid Changes in the Market that Will Increase Costs

Some of the state’s generation companies want to receive big payments for power plants, regardless of whether any power is actually generated — and are lobbying hard for changes to make it happen. TCAP will oppose proposals at the Legislature that create unnecessary price supports for generators that circumvent the competitive market and increase electricity costs to consumers.

Updating Market Protections in the Lone Star State

Whereappropriate,anti-competitivebehaviorprohibitedinotherstatesshouldalsobeprohibitedinTexas. Texas regulators should have the same power to assess penalties as regulators elsewhere. Legal loopholes that exempt some generators from prosecution should be closed.

Promote Public-Private Electric Generation Partnerships

TCAPwantscitiestohavetherighttopursuesmall-scalegenerationprojects,justsolongastheprojectsenhanceeconomicdevelopmentandproduceaffordablepower.Suchpublic-privatepartnershipsalsoareacost-effectivewaytohelpaddressthestate’slong-termgenerationandreliabilitychallenges.

No foreign ownership of electric distribution facilities

Texans depend on a complex network of wires to bring power to their homes. With so much at stake, accountability is important. That’s why there should be no foreign ownership of local electric distribution networks. When the system fails or bills go up, Texans shouldn’t have to call Madrid to complain. Home rule cities — individually or collectively —also should be permitted to own and operate electric distribution networks.

Hold Big Generation Companies Accountable for Market Abuses

Under Texas law, big generation companies can obtain advanced regulatory protections against future prosecutionforanti-competitivebehavior.TCAPsupportsreformstoensurethattheseadvancedprotections are fair, and don’t become “Get Out Of Jail Free” cards for market abusers.

National Nutrition Month® 2013

Proclamation (State or City) OF EXECUTIVE OFFICE PROCLAMATION WHEREAS food is the substance by which life is sustained; and WHEREAS the type, quality, and amount of food that individuals consume each day plays a vital role in their overall health and physical fitness; and WHEREAS there is a need for continuing nutrition education and a wide-scale effort to enhance healthy eating practices; NOW, THEREFORE I, _________________(Name), __________________(Title) _________________________________________________________, (City/State) DO HEREBY PROCLAIM the month of March NATIONAL NUTRITION MONTH® in (City/State)_______________, and I encourage all citizens to join the campaign and become concerned about their nutrition and the nutrition of others in the hope of achieving optimum health for both today and tomorrow. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the _____________________________________________________________________ to be affixed. Done at the ____________on this the ________day of ________________________, Two thousand and thirteen. By: Title: Attest: Title:

P R O C L A M A T I O N

WHEREAS, For over 150 years, Lutheran Schools have provided communities,

states, and the country with Christian leaders in business, politics, military, ministry, education, and other fields; and

WHEREAS, National Lutheran Schools Month is also an occasion for schools

to interest citizens in volunteering their time and talents to local Lutheran Schools; and

WHEREAS, Lutheran Schools have provided a quality Christian education

program that has inspired students to serve others through civic engagement and provided students with opportunities to serve while equipping them with the tools they need to fulfill their future roles as good citizens, productive employees, and compassionate leaders; and

WHEREAS, Locally we are joining with Trinity Lutheran School as they

celebrate almost 63 years of service to our Community; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim March, 2013 as

“NATIONAL LUTHERAN SCHOOLS MONTH” and encourage everyone to pay tribute to the dedication and service of Trinity Lutheran School for their many years of commitment to the community of San Angelo.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 19th day of March, 2013.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ALVIN NEW, MAYOR

City of San Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: March 5, 2013

To: City Council members

From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

Subject: PD 13-01 West Company/Granger Macdonald, A request for approval of a zone change from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) to specifically allow for multi-family living and a lease house /amenity center on the following property:

Location: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property, located directly west of the

intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval of this request will change the zoning designation on the

property and allow the construction of multi-family dwelling units.

Contacts: Andrew Mellen, West Company 432-682-0588 Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner 325-657-4210

Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE

CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the

2

intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The City Council may:

(1) Approve the proposed zone change;

(2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or

(3) Approve subject to modification OR acceptance of proposed conditions; or (4) Deny the proposed zone change Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change, subject to the Conditions listed in Conditions 5-14 of the attached draft ordinance. Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a 5-0 vote on February 18, 2013.

History and Background:

General Information

Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General

Commercial (CG) Existing Land Use: undeveloped, vacant property Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: CH Undeveloped open property West: CG & RS-1 Undeveloped property & ball fields South: RS-1 Red Arroyo, vacant land East: CG Vacant property & retail establishments

3

Thoroughfares/Streets: Northwest Drive is defined as a collector street in

this area and is designed to collect local street traffic carrying it to arterial streets at a moderate speed.

Green Hill Road is defined as a local street and is

designed to carries light neighborhood traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets.

Zoning History: No previous zoning history on this property. The

general area was annexed into the City Limits in November of 1997

Development Standards: All required off-street parking and the

connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved.

Construction of more than one principal building

for multi-family use on a lot requires an Urban Design Review to be completed and approved before construction may take place.

Other applicable development standards are

included in the draft ordinance at the end of this report.

Vision Plan Map: Commercial Comp Plan Excerpts: Goal Three from the Neighborhood Section of the

2009 Comprehensive Plan states that (the city should), "Improve relationship between adjacent commercial and residential land use adjacencies." One action step of this goal states that (the city should), " Require a buffer separating commercial, industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from neighborhoods. This buffer may be an intermediate “mixed-use” zone, a landscape buffer, or public right-of-way.

Goal One from the Commercial Section of the

2009 Comprehensive Plan states that (the city should), "Establish transition areas between commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods."

4

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential and commercial to Planned Development with the allowance for a multi-family living facility will certainly generate additional traffic than if the property remained as is. Northwest Drive has immediate access to the Houston Harte Expressway and Arden Road; both of these roadways are designed to carry traffic at higher speeds with limited access.

Parking Requirements: See Section 11 of the attached draft ordinance. Parking Provided: No off-street parking is currently provided. Density: No development is currently open space is

currently present in this area Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 1

Responses in Favor: 0 Responses in Opposition: 0

Analysis:

In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible

with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.

2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.

3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.

4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.

5

5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed

amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.

6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.

7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Staff finds this request to be consistent and compatible with the plans and policies adopted by the community for this particular area. When examining the comprehensive Plan as a whole, the intent is to transition from more intense zoning classifications slowly into neighborhoods. In examining this particular request, staff believes a multi-family complex will serve as this transition in this area. The areas along Houston Harte are intended for higher trafficked and more intense commercial uses. In examining this particular area, there is neighborhood development called for to the west. Staff believes this request is consistent with the goals of the community's comprehensive plan and this particular development will serve as a gentle transition into the neighborhood areas. Given the current zoning of the property, a much higher intensity usage would be allowed and also be a much less suitable into the neighborhood areas identified within the vision plan. It is the belief of staff that a Planned Development for this particular property will generally be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The introduction of a multi-family dwelling unit development in this area is compatible with the surrounding area. The street network's capability in this area and isolated location make this an area where staff believes a multi-family dwelling will be successful. This higher intensity, residential development will not generate the traffic that a retail establishment has the potential to, but at the same time the number of visitors to and from the site will be more like a traditional neighborhood, but a more compact scale. Staff is confident this Planned Development will serve as a buffer from the higher intensity commercial uses that may occur along northwest to the envisioned neighborhood development areas to the west. The Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan seek to create these transition areas between land uses and in turn help to create orderly predictable development in this area. This proposal will not alter development patterns in this area, in fact this development may serve as a catalyst for infill development in this area, something that is also encouraged within the Comprehensive Plan.

6

The intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance is to create transitional zones between commercial zoning and residential zoning within the community. Multi-family developments tend to be a bit of a hybrid regarding the actual land use. These types of developments are residential in nature and use, but depending upon the size, can generate traffic at a higher rate than a lower density neighborhood can. While apartments can be part of a successful neighborhood (one which offers a wide variety of housing options), staff believes this Planned Development and the intensity it is seeking to create on the property will be consistent with the goals and intent of the Comprehensive Plan for this area. As such, no vision Comprehensive Plan amendment will be required to approve this request. This proposal will certainly have an effect on the natural environment in this area as the land is currently undeveloped and in its natural state. The proximity to the Red Arroyo and the sheer size of this development will require some storm water mitigation through the platting process. The applicant is aware of the effect this development will have on the area and it is the understanding of staff that there are plans being worked on to account for this effect on the environment in this area. The development is located nearby other businesses at this time, but given the size of the parcels in this area will be somewhat isolated when it is completed. Given the development patterns of the area and isolation from other properties, staff believes that neighboring properties will see little to no detrimental effects from this proposed development. The community is certainly growing and a need for more housing and housing choices certainly comes along with the anticipated growth. Staff believes this area has a great potential for infill development or both commercial and residential opportunities. A multi-family development will serve as a transition between zoning districts and will help to ensure consistent development patterns in this area. This region of town has some commercial uses and lower density residential zoning and development in place currently. This mix of housing choices in the region will help to solidify the development patterns and be highly consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in staff's opinion. The commercial zoning present along Houston Harte and Arden Road will need a population base to develop successfully in staff's opinion. Allowing for a multi-family development in this area would add population that can utilize the existing businesses, and also has the potential to create demand for new businesses. This relationship between commercial and residential properties in this area can be promoted and protected further by introducing this Planned Development District to serve as a transition and a compliment to current and future development for the area. The draft ordinance accompanying this report is designed in a manner that ensures that the plans and renderings submitted will occur on this property. Due to the nature of the Planned Development, any deviations in design or layout of the site would require rehearing. Staff believes a project of this size and scale in this area, the design and site layout are essential. The site plan allows for circulation inside and outside the site in a logical, orderly pattern; in addition the renderings of the buildings and proposed

7

materials are aesthetically pleasing and will be a compliment to the area in staff's opinion. Proposed Conditions

Conditions of the Planned Development are listed in the draft ordinance at the end of this report in sections 5 through 14.

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo;

excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting

the subject property; draft minute excerpt from the February 18, 2013 Planning

Commission meeting; draft ordinance with site plan; and large scale site plan.

Presentation: AJ Fawver, AICP Interim Director of Development Services

9

10

11

B. PD 13-01: West Company/ Granger Macdonald A request for approval of a zone change from a combination of Single-Family

Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) to specifically allow for multi-family living and a lease house /amenity center on the following property:

an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently

described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo.

Jeff Hintz, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. He gave some background about the property, highlighting the classification for the property in the Vision Plan Map ("Commercial"). The area is surrounded by commercial properties, and there is some undeveloped property, as well as ball fields to the west. The area was annexed in 1997. Mr. Hintz reviewed the criteria required to be considered as part of zone change requests. The request is consistent with the City's plans, policies and ordinances and is compatible with the surrounding area. An Urban Design Review was required due to the size of the planned construction, and this UDR has been approved by the Interim Director/Planning Manager. This less intensive zoning will provide a better transition than the stark commercial to low-intensity residential change that exists today. The platting process will handle storm water requirements and other development-related standards. The Comprehensive Plan speaks to improving the relationship between adjacent commercial and residential land use adjacencies, which staff finds this plan actually does. This property also provides flexibility of design, meets the traffic capabilities of the area, and provides infill development. The PD is the most predictable type of zoning district, as a custom zoning ordinance is crafted for the use. Mr. Hintz addressed the community need - providing a diverse mix of housing, and that it is far less intensive than the current zoning allows. Mr. Hintz showed the planned subdivision plat and the UDR that was approved by the staff members. The concept plan for the ordinance, illustrating the layout of residential buildings on this tract. The proposed PD ordinance only allows for multi-family living and an amenity center. The development is in accordance with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Signage will match the materials of the dwelling units, and pole signs are strictly prohibited. Landscaping will be providing, and a wrought iron fence with brick columns will surround the exterior of the site along the boundaries. Sidewalks are also proposed, so it certainly makes this area a walkable one. Mr. Hintz offered to answer any other questions or get into the details of the ordinance more, but the Commission had no additional questions. Justin McDonald, representing the applicant, came forward to answer any questions the Commission had, and complimented the staff on their presentation. Mr. Wynne asked for the number of units, and Mr. McDonald stated that there are 176 units planned. Jennifer Boggs asked about the mix of units. Mr. McDonald mentioned that the units will be a mix of 1b/1b, 2b/2b, and 3b/2b. Mr. Hintz answered

specifically the number of units that are allocated for each group. Mr. McDonald mentioned that they also handled the apartment complex on Irene Street, and that it will somewhat resemble those units. No one else came forward to speak. Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Darlene Jones and seconded by Jennifer Boggs. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: PD 13-01: West Company/Granger Macdonald

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing

body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted

by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: an unaddressed 9.8 acre property out of approximately 75 acres currently described as Section 3, Arden Acres, which is located adjacent to and directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road in western San Angelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Planned Development (PD) District allowing for multi-family living and a lease house/amenity center.

The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.

SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any

portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:

PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

SECTION 5: Except as otherwise specified or limited below, the use and

development of the subject property shall generally conform to a High Rise Multi-Family Residence (RM-2) zoning district unless specified as otherwise within this ordinance. All activities shall be limited to those associated with multi-family living, lease house/amenities center.

SECTION 6: Overall site use shall be in accordance with the map shown as Exhibit

A of this Ordinance. Changes to the usage of this property shall be approved through an amendment to this Planned Development District with approval from the Planning Commission and City Council.

SECTION 7: Design of the buildings, coloring, and materials shall conform to the

conditional approval given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the Planning Director on February 8, 2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the Planning Division.

SECTION 8: The following uses are allowed on the subject property, and shall

include: 1. Apartment dwelling units for "Household Living" as defined in section 313.B.1 of

the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Offices are to be used solely for the management of the units developed on this

site as shown on the concept plan. 3. Incidental accessory uses are intended for tenants and their guests only; this

includes laundry facilities, lease house/amenities center, and recreational areas. SECTION 9: Signage shall be allowed within this Planned Development District,

provided it meets all of the following criteria:

1. On-site signage shall be limited to free-standing (specifically monument) types only. Pole signage is expressly prohibited.

2. Internally illuminated signage is expressly prohibited. 3. All signage shall be constructed from the same materials and colors approved in

the conditional approval given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the Planning Director on February 8, 2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the Planning Division.

4. Quantity of signage, area of signage, and placement of signage shall be as

directed within the Sign Ordinance for the City of San Angelo. SECTION 10: Fencing around the exterior of the site and the pool area shall be

of wrought iron with masonry and stone columns consistent with the conditional approval given (see Urban Design Review 13-01) approved by the Planning Director on February 8, 2013 and as maintained on file in the offices of the Planning Division. Other usage of fencing material for screening purposes, within the confines of the concept plan for this Planned Development shall be in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 509 of the Zoning Ordinance.

SECTION 11: Parking standards within this Planned Development District shall

be as follows: 1. One bedroom apartments shall have 1.5 parking spaces per unit. 2. Two bedroom apartments shall have 1.75 parking spaces per unit 3. Three bedroom apartments shall have 2.0 parking spaces per unit. 4. Areas used for the rental office shall have 1 parking space per 300 square feet

gross of office space. 5. Design standards for the parking spaces shall be in accordance with Section

511 of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 511.G of the Zoning Ordinance defines dimensions and maneuvering room. Section 511.F of the Zoning Ordinance defines the maintenance of parking facilities.

SECTION 12: The sidewalks as shown on the graphic concept plan identified in

Exhibit A shall be no less than four feet in width, shall be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, and shall meet all ADA accessibility standards.

SECTION 13: No outdoor storage shall be allowed within the boundaries of this

Planned Development District.

SECTION 14: This Planned Development district shall not be added to the Official Zoning Map for the City of San Angelo, until the replat establishing Tract 3, Block 3, in Section Three of the Arden Acres is recorded with the Tom Green County Clerk.

INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013.


____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST:

________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form: _________________________ ________________________ AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Development Services

Exhibit A, Site Plan

NORTHW

EST

DR

GREEN HILL RD

É

WES

T C

OM

PAN

Y

OF

MID

LAN

D, I

NC

.

GREEN HILL RD

0'

SCALE 1" = 50'

50' 100' 150'

LEGEND

INGRESS & EGRESSGREEN HILL ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED FROM ITS

CURRENT INTERSECTION WITH NORTHWEST DRIVE AT

THE NORTHEAST CORNER PHASE I TO LOOP AROUND

AND INTERSECT NORTHWEST DRIVE AT THE SOUTHEAST

CORNER OF PHASE I

SIDEWALKSFOUR-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED

BEHIND BACK OF CURB ALONG PROPOSED GREEN HILL

ROAD, NORTHWEST DRIVE, AND PHASE I FRONTAGE

BUILDING SETBACKSBUILDING SETBACK DISTANCES OF 25 FEET FROM THE

PROPERTY LINE WILL BE OBSERVED ALONG GREEN HILL

ROAD AND NORTHWEST DRIVE

SITE UTILITIESEXISTING UTILITIES ARE IN PLACE. IT IS THE INTENT FOR

ADDITIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE TO BE BUILT AS SHOWN

ON THIS PLAN.

PARKING SPACESPER THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO'S PARKING REQUIREMENTS:

3-BED= 40(UNITS) x 2 SPACES= 80 (SPACES)

2-BED= 64(UNITS) x 1.75 SPACES= 112 (SPACES)

1-BED= 72(UNITS) x 1.5 SPACES= 108 (SPACES)

TOTAL REQUIRED 300 (SPACES)

TOTAL PROVIDED= 325 (SPACES)

FIRE PROTECTIONA 26' WIDE FIRE LANE HAS BEEN PROVIDED AT THE

FRONT OF ALL BUILDINGS. THE FIRE LANE WILL BE

IDENTIFIED BY PAINTED STRIPES AND CURBS PER IBC

CODE 2009.

DRAINAGEIT IS OUR INTENT TO PROVIDE A REGIONAL DETENTION

BASIN PER CITY OF SAN ANGELO REQUIREMENTS FOR

THIS MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE

FRONTAGE OF THE SOUTHERN SEWER EASEMENT WITH

APPROPRIATE CONVEYANCE ACROSS THE EXISTING

SEWER LINE ROUTING TO THE CHANNEL.

TRASH ENCLOSURESTRASH DUMPSTERS TO BE PLACED AS SHOWN.

ENCLOSURES TO BE BUILT OF FENCE-CRETE OR CMU,

AND WILL MATCH DESIGN OF SCREENING WALL.

NOTES1. ALL BUILDINGS ARE 2 STORY.

2. ALL AMENITIES ARE FOR RESIDENCE ONLY.

PROPOSED FENCING

City of San Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: February 19, 2013


From: Roxanne Johnston, Planner

Subject: Z13-02: Debbie Clark. A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts on the following property:

Location: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of

the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning Commission would forward the recommendation to City Council for a final decision on the matter.

Contacts: Debbie Clark 325-659-3901

Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210


Z 13-02: Debbie Clark

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING

THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


(1) Approve this zone change request from RS-1 to RS-2 which would allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts; or

(2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to

be more appropriate; or (3) Deny this zoning request from RS-1 to RS-2.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. On January 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a unanimous vote of 5-0.


General Information

Existing Zoning: Single Family Residential (RS-1) Existing Land Use: Vacant property, vacant residence Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RS-1 Residential West: RS-1 & RS-2 Residential South: RS-1 & OW Residential & vacant property East: RS-1 & CO Residential & vacant property

Thoroughfares/Streets: Montague Avenue is defined as a “major

collector” and is designed to carry traffic at

moderate speeds to connect arterials to local streets

Beacon Street is defined as a “local street”

which carries light neighborhood traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets.

Zoning History: The property has been a part of the city

limits since at least 1949 with little change in zoning and use to the immediate area.

Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be

found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning Ordinance.

Section 511.B of the Zoning Ordinance requires two off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit.

Development Standards: Residential development setbacks are

outlined in Section 501 of the Zoning Ordinance.

All required off-street parking and the

connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved as defined in Section 511.F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance.

Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood for the subject properties with

a Transitional Zone located directly south on Beacon Street as a buffer to Commercial envisioned areas further south.

Related Comp Plan Excerpts: “Create new physical connections to

neighborhoods lined with transitional and intermediate uses."

"Promote neighborhood diversity and security by encouraging a mix of age, income, and housing choices within San Angelo's neighborhoods.” "Encourage in-fill development sensitive to the existing and desired content of the area” “Encourage the re-use of vacant buildings in the city. Carefully integrate new uses into older

areas, in a manner that encourages comfort, accessibility, efficiency and aesthetic gratification for resident and visitor alike.”

“All residents within each neighborhood boundary should be able to meet their daily needs within a reasonable and accessible distance from their home.” "Variety of residential product types - multi-family, townhomes, courtyard homes, patio homes, etc."

Establish transition areas to better "scale-

down" intensity of use from commercial centers to neighborhoods."

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to RS-2 will create little impact on the volume of traffic than if the property remained as-is, being that 4 of the lots are vacant at this time.

Parking Requirements: New residential units require a minimum of

two off-street parking spaces. All areas used for off-street parking shall be paved, per Section 511.F.3 of the Zoning Ordinance.

Parking Provided: No paved parking spots at this time. Density: Surrounding uses are predominately of a

low density residential nature. There are many vacant lots in the area.

Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 22


Analysis:

In order to approve this Zone change request, City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria:

1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.




5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.



The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.

The applicant stated to Planning Staff that she wished to re-zone so that she could convert an existing vacant building into a duplex. This zone change request from RS-1 to RS-2 is a only a slight change from current zoning and Staff feels that the proposed change is in keeping with the 7 criteria listed above, all of which will be explained in the following. A zone change to RS-2 will allow the owner and future owners to enjoy the same residential uses that are allowed by right as current zoning with just one exception. Essentially, the only difference is that it allows a two family residence or accessory apartment on the property. Because of this minute difference, the proposed zone change is consistent with both the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Again, since there is little change from its current zoning the immediate area will remain residential. The proposed zone change area lies amid an older, more established low-density residential area with large sections of undeveloped land nearby to the east and north. Beacon Street dead ends

about 200 feet east of the property. As a major collector, Montague Street is situated west of the subject property and ties into East Houston Harte Expressway, located approximately 390 feet south of the property. The Comprehensive Plan calls for residential areas to be typified by a mix of housing stock, which in this case refers to the addition of a duplex, and for housing to be in close proximity to commercial zones, which is also the case here. Two different uses were introduced nearby; in 1982, an area approximately 155 feet west of the subject property was re-zoned from RS-1 to RS-2 to allow for a duplex. In 1985, Special Permit 1122 was given to allow for “a mobile home to be owner family occupied and to have two residences on one zoning lot.” These illustrate a precedence by the City Council to allow a mix of housing stock to the area, which was and still is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan as would allowing an additional zone change from RS-1 to RS-2 in this area. Conditions would remain relatively the same or may even improve should the zone change be approved. There are several vacant lots in and around the subject property. The Vision Plan calls for the subject property to remain as ‘Neighborhood’ in nature with a “Transitional” zoning district directly to the south. This “Transitional” zone creates a buffer between commercial areas further south, which is an ideal situation in terms of the Vision Plan. Therefore, the zone change request is consistent with aspects of the Vision Plan and will most certainly have a positive impact on current and future land uses. RS-2 zoning here for a duplex could also encourage redevelopment and provide encouragement for future neighborhood development that would be compatible with surrounding uses, including Holiman Elementary School to the north of this neighborhood and Producer’s Park to the northwest. This zoning request would have minimal negative impacts on the natural environment, again, since there is a little change between RS-1 and RS-2 uses. The only perceivable difference would be that a minimum of two paved parking spaces per dwelling unit and the access from the street to them are required per Section 511 of the Ordinance, but this would cause overall minimal runoff to the area as would the construction of a larger building footprint. These would most likely not negatively affect neighboring properties. San Angelo is experiencing a need for increased housing stock as our population has been increasing. According to the United States Department of Commerce, population increased by nearly 5,000 between the years 2000 and 2010.1 In this instance, an existing vacant house would be repurposed to provide more housing to assist with community need, so Criteria 6 would be met should the zone change be approved. Smart Also addressing community need is this: the proposed area is situated in what contains several potential components of a walk-able community from a Smart

1 www.quickfacts.census.gov (accessed 01/18/13).

http://www.quickfacts.census.gov/

Growth point of view. Smart Growth, can be defined as “development that serves the economy, the community and the environment”2 and promotes strong neighborhoods through choices in transportation and housing. Smart Growth also offers a higher level of social interaction, reduced emissions caused by automobile travel and greater opportunities for physical opportunity that are brought about by higher pedestrian and bicycling uses. Both Holiman Elementary north on Montague Street and Producer’s Park to the northwest off of Magnolia Street are located less than 1/3 of a mile from the subject property. Commercial access exists less than a half a mile west from the subject property along Bell Street. These are just three examples of current locations that area residents have reasonable pedestrian and bicycle access to. In addition to meeting Criteria 1-6, Staff feels this request is in keeping with Criteria 7. A rezone to RS-2 is most certainly a logical progression in terms of development patterns. Again, the change is very slight from the current zoning and the Vision Plan calls for the area to remain residential. A rezone to RS-2 would have little negative impact on the area, if any, and again, could help encourage future development in a predictable, orderly manner which is exactly the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

Proposed Conditions

N/A

Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within the City of San Angelo;

excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject

property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision map

highlighting the subject property; and notification map highlighting responses from

neighboring properties. citizen response letters; draft minutes from January 28, 2013 Planning

Commission meeting; and 2 www.smartgrowthpa.org (accessed 01/22/13).

http://www.smartgrowthpa.org/

draft Ordinance.

Presentation: Roxanne Johnston, Planner Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (01/21/13)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 13-02: Debbie Clark





by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District.


SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described

property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.


SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that,

if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.



INTRODUCED on the 19th day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013.


____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form: _________________________ ________________________

AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, October 15, 2012 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OF THE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

PRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones,

Bill Wynne ABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE) STAFF: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Jeff Hintz, Planner Kevin Boyd, Planner Roxanne Johnston, Planner B. Z 13-02: Debbie Clark A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-

1) to Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts on the following property:

2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of

Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo.

Roxanne Johnston came forward to present this item, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. There were 22 notifications sent out, with 3 returned in favor and 0 returned in opposition of the request. She showed a series of maps to the Commission members, illustrating the area in which the subject property is located. She illustrated the tracts representing owners who were in favor of this request. Ms. Johnston also reviewed the criteria of approval which the Zoning Ordinance requires to be considered in all zone change cases. Ms. Johnston discussed that the Comprehensive Plan discusses establishing a mix of housing within neighborhoods and encourages "neighborhood" development in this area, which staff feels this would meet. This is especially so when realizing that there is an area for "transitional" development immediately adjacent to the property. The area is largely developed in a traditional neighborhood style, with infrastructure and a street network largely reflective of - and appropriate for -

this type of development. There is a school in this neighborhood area, along with a city park. There are a few businesses in the area that help promote a walkable community. Staff feels a minor change in land use fits in and meets all of the criteria which are required for consideration in this area as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. There were no questions for Ms. Johnston. Debbie Clark, the proponent, came forward to speak in favor of this request. She would like to develop this area now and in the future. There was no one else in attendance who desired to speak on this item. Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Bill Wynne and seconded by Jennifer Boggs. Motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 13-02: Debbie Clark





by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) District.





SEVERABILITY:

The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.





____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form: _________________________ ________________________ AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San

Angelo

Memo



From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

Subject: Z 13-03 Tom Green County: A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property:

Location: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the

intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property

Neighborhood Commercial (CN)

Contacts: Judge Michael D. Brown 325-653-3318 Jeff Hintz, Planner 325-657-4210


Z 13-03: Tom Green County AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF

THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


(1) Approve the proposed zone change; or

(2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or

(3) Deny the proposed zone change.

Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request 5-0 at the January 28, 2013 Meeting.


General Information

Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) Existing Land Use: Vacant office building and parking lot Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: CG/CH Various retail establishments West: RS-1 Mobile Home Park South: RS-1 Church & single-family residences East: CN & RS-1 Church & single-family residences

Thoroughfares/Streets: Pulliam Street & North Bell Street are defined as "arterial streets," and designed to connect collector streets to freeways and other arterials carrying large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the primary function of these streets.

Zoning History: Special Permit 200 approved in August of

1966 allowed the construction of a "welfare building" in an RS-1 zoning district.

Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be

found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning Ordinance

Development Standards: Section 502 of the Zoning Ordinance

covers general development standards for the property.

In CN districts, “Type 1 Outdoor Display

shall be allowed adjacent to a principal building wall and extending to a distance no greater than 5 feet from the wall. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building.”

Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood Center Comp Plan Excerpts: Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of

“Neighborhoods” is to “improve the relationship between adjacent commercial and residential properties”. CG/CH zoning currently borders the RS-1 properties, a CN zoning would be a more suitable and less harsh buffer between the two.

“Commercial properties tend to be

organized in a single use, isolated pattern of development. This form generates little synergy between businesses and land uses and often results in incompatibility.”

“All residents within each neighborhood

boundary should be able to meet their daily needs within a reasonable and accessible distance from their home.”

“Promote better transition between nearby commercial and residential use of land and buildings.”

“Rezone or remove any CG/CH zoning

from adjacent to existing neighborhoods." “Require a buffer separating commercial,

industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from neighborhoods.”

“Establish transition areas between

commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods.”

“Organize commercial uses in nodes to

avoid deteriorating corridors.”

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to commercial generally will add traffic to an area, however given the past zoning history on the property, this residential property has functioned as commercial property for decades.

Parking Requirements: Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance

covers parking standards and requirements vary by proposed usage(s).

Parking Provided: It appears off-street parking is available on

this lot; the number of spots will depend upon lot orientation and future building configuration.

Density: This general area is of medium density

residential and higher intensity commercial uses that are of a lower density.



Analysis:

In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is

compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.







The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. In looking at this proposal, Planning staff has found that a CN zoning district is compatible with the plans and policies in place for the community and that the zone change is consistent with the zoning ordinance. This particular property has functioned as a public building in some fashion for nearly 50 years despite the RS-1 zoning. This area between Pulliam Street and Koberlin Street is a mixed use are with a multitude of varying uses. Houses, churches, and some lower intensity commercial opportunities make sense; the plans and policies in place for the community recognize this need for neighborhood serving businesses that a CN zoning district will allow for. Introducing a more intensive zoning district would not be appropriate for this area given the intensive land uses allowed for in CG/CH zoning that is present on

Pulliam. A CN zoning designation will provide a suitable buffer into the neighborhoods that are prevalent to the south of this subject property without diminishing the ability for this property to develop. At the same time, a CN zone will also allow the responsible and sustainable development of the neighborhoods to the south. This zone change request is certainly in line with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance as responsible & predictable development for properties both new and in the future is exactly the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff believes that the CN zoning in this area is compatible with the surrounding area; as previously mentioned, the lower intensity commercial opportunities that are allowed within this zoning district have high potential to be an asset to the neighborhood in both the short and long term. While not all types of commercial activities would be appropriate for this particular property (given the proximity to the neighborhood, churches, and other lower intensity businesses) staff believes some lower intensity neighborhood serving businesses would be a fit that is compatible with the surrounding area. Several properties to the south of this general area provide prime opportunities for some infill development; some new businesses that serve the area may have the potential to revitalize this area and usher in the infill development. This area is envisioned within the Comprehensive Plan's Vision Map as a "Neighborhood Center." CN zoning fits in this vision. Neighborhood Center envisioned areas are designed to compliment neighborhoods with opportunities for higher density residential opportunities and some lower intensity, lower scale commercial opportunities. In this case, the Neighborhood Center envisioned area provides these development opportunities, and serves as a buffer from the "Industrial" and higher intensity "Commercial" envisioned areas just to the northwest of this area. Since this particular zone change is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan, there is no need for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to approve this request. In addition, staff does not believe the impact on the natural environment will be detrimentally affected through the approval of this zone change. While some impact due to storm water runoff will certainly be taking place (since the property is already improved) staff is unable to find any other negative environmental consequences that will result from this zone change. Staff also believes this zone change request has potential to serve a community need in this particular area. Pulliam Street offers multiple opportunities for higher intensity commercial development in the CG/CH zoning district in this area, however the opportunities for neighborhood serving, walkable businesses in this area are less prevalent. From this standpoint, staff believes this proposal for CN zoning will help to fill a community need and be a benefit to the area. Staff finds that a CN zoning district on the subject property will create an orderly development pattern that is consistent with the surrounding area. As one travels

south from Pulliam along Bell Street, the character of the area is much less intense and becomes solely residential fairly quickly. Staff feels anything more intensive in this area has the potential to upset this balance and encroach into a long standing neighborhood. It should be mentioned that this neighborhood has been zoned as RS-1 since approximately 1954 and for the most part has developed as such with little commercial encroachment. Staff finds is necessary to protect and promote the current and future growth of this neighborhood; the introduction of CN zoning will allow this to occur while serving the needs of the residents of this neighborhood at the same time. Neighborhood serving, walkable businesses will serve the neighborhood in this area both now and in the future; the goals of infill, walkable development are highly in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan and sound neighborhood development principles. Staff believes this request will be a responsible addition, that is in harmony with the neighborhood and will only aid in the future development of the area. Proposed Conditions

N/A



property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision Map

highlighting the subject property; draft minutes from 01/28/13 Planning Commission

meeting; and Draft Ordinance.

Presentation: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services.

C. Z 13-03: Tom Green County A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to

Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property:

318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North

Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo.

Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. Mr. Hintz began by revealing that 17 notifications were sent out on this request, and 0 were received in favor or in opposition to this request. Mr. Hintz explained that Tom Green County is looking to sell this property. Mr. Hintz revealed that the Vision Plan map calls for "neighborhood center" at this location. A number of photographs were shown on and around the site. There are two churches in close proximity to this location, and a large neighborhood, which is mostly developed. The Comprehensive Plan encourages buffer zones to be located between commercial properties and residential neighborhoods. This property is in a prime location to provide such a buffer zone, and the proposal is consistent with that idea. There is a mix of zoning districts in the area, as well as a special permit in place which would allow a "welfare building" on the property - which is what the county utilized that site for at one time. He referred back to the criteria of approval which Ms. Johnston reviewed in depth in the previous case. Mr. Hintz also reviewed several excerpts from the city's Comprehensive Plan which supports this type of zoning at this location. This proposal is consistent with the City's plans and policies. Staff believes this type of zoning is suitable for this area and is a good fit as opposed to heavier types of commercial zoning. This does follow development patterns for this area. Staff sees little anticipated effect on the natural environment, especially when considering that the building is already constructed and in place. Bill Lawrence asked for clarification regarding the buffer zone placement at this location and addressed the opportunity for a better and more appropriate transition to be placed at this site. The "neighborhood center" is intended for higher-density residential development, and so the current zoning does not work in line with that intention. Bill Wynne stated his opinion that this would correct the zoning that has long been in place. Judge Mike Brown, with Tom Green County, came forward to speak in favor of this request. He stated that their objective is to have the zoning changed to something more marketable in order to offer it for sale down the road. The building is currently vacant. There were no other comments in favor or in opposition of the request.

Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Joe Grimes and seconded by Jennifer Boggs. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.


RE: Z 13-03: Tom Green County





by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District.





RE: Z 13-03: Tom Green County





by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District.











____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:









____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:


City of San

Angelo

Memo




Subject: Z 13-04 Abel Fernandez. A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property:

Location: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the

northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval or modification of this request by the Planning

Commission would forward that recommendation to City Council for a final decision on the matter.

Contacts: Abel Fernandez, property owner 325-482-0946

Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210


Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE

WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


(1) Approve this zone change request from RS-1 to RS-2 which would allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts; or

(2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to

be more appropriate; or

(3) Deny this zoning request from RS-1 to RS-2. Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. On January 28, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a unanimous vote of 5-0. History and Background:

General Information

Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential (RS-1) Existing Land Use: Vacant residential Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RS-1 Single-Family Residential West: RS-1 Single-Family Residential South: RS-1 Single-Family Residential East: RS-1 Single-Family Residential

Thoroughfares/Streets: East 14th Street is defined as a “collector street” which provides direct access to residential, commercial and other land uses.

Wade Street is defined a "local street" and

is designed to carry light traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets.

East Main Street is defined as an “arterial

street” and is designed to connect collector streets to freeways and other arterials carrying large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the primary function of these streets.

Zoning History: Residential as early as 1939. Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be

found in Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning Ordinance. . Refer to off-street parking standards, per Section 511. Section 602. “B. No nonconforming structure may be enlarged, expanded or extended in such a manner that it shall be made more nonconforming… A non-conforming structure may be enlarged expanded or extended so long as the nonconforming feature is not enlarged, expanded or extended, thereby making the structure more nonconforming.”

Development Standards: Section 502. Nonresidential Development

Standards Neighborhood Commercial (CN) requires a 25 feet front setback for commercial structures. No side or rear setback are required in commercial districts unless the lot abuts a residential district or use, where a minimum of 10 feet is required.

Section 504 of the Zoning Ordinance covers outdoor storage and display. Aside from Type 1 outdoor display, no other outside storage is allowed here.

A.1. “Type 1 Outdoor Display shall be

allowed adjacent to a principal building wall and extending to a distance no greater than 5 feet from the wall. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building.

E.1. “Unless specifically authorized

elsewhere… all outdoor storage and display shall be located outside the public right-of-way and/or at least 15 feet from the back edge of the adjacent curb or street pavement.

Section 509. Fences A.1. “A privacy fence shall be required

where the side or rear lot line of a nonresidential use is adjacent to either of the following.

a. A residential district boundary other than the R&E District.

b. An existing residential use.

Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood Center & Neighborhood Comp Plan Excerpts: Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of

“Neighborhoods” is to “improve the relationship between adjacent commercial and residential properties”.

“All residents within each neighborhood

boundary should be able to meet their daily needs within a reasonable and accessible distance from their home.”

“Promote better transition between nearby

commercial and residential use of land and buildings.”

“Establish transition areas between commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods.”

“Address issues related to the transition of

older homes into offices, including parking and compatibility with surrounding areas.”

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to commercial use will generally add traffic to an area, but due to the small lot size and that CN is the least intensive of commercial zoning, potential businesses locating there will most likely yield little traffic than would more intensive uses.

Parking Requirements: Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance

covers parking standards; the requirement varies depending on the proposed usage(s). The requirement for a tax service establishment, for example, would be 1 space paved per 300ft2 gross floor area.

Parking Provided: It appears off-street parking opportunity is

available on this lot; the number of spots will depend upon lot orientation and future building configuration.

Density: This general area is of light to medium

density residential with lower density businesses outside of the current RS-1 zone. The zone change request complies with the Vision Plan, which calls for a continuation of the future development of this area as “Neighborhood Center."



Analysis:

In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is

compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.







The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. The subject property is located on the fringes of an older RS-1 zoning district within 300 feet of North Main Street. The applicant is planning to operate a tax service business from the property and seeks to repurpose a vacant house to do so. Atmos Energy, a planned development, is located near the property to the northeast. There are a variety of mixed uses and zoning to the east and southeast of the subject property which include an assisted living and retirement facilities. To the north, within walking distance of well under ½ a mile, are a variety of businesses that support neighborhood services such as restaurants and car repair shops. Near the same area to the north are more intense land uses (CG/CH) that allow for heavy land use, such as junk yards; although certainly not allowed on the subject property. In the future, the Vision Plan calls for CG/CH zoning districts to be phased out.

In looking at this proposal, Planning Staff has found that a CN zoning district is compatible with the plans and policies in place for the community and that the zone change is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Staff feels this request is compatible with and appropriate to the surrounding area. A CN zoning district lies less than 35 feet from the southeastern section of the property. The Vision Plan calls for about 1/3 of the subject property to the east to be zoned “Neighborhood Center” with the remaining staying “Residential.” Due to the size of this property, the nature of businesses that could locate there in the future are constricted by the lot size and limited area for parking, so this property use will likely remain smaller and less intensive in nature and would generate little traffic to the area. Residential near CN zoning which allows lower intensity commercial opportunities make sense; the plans and policies in place for the community recognize this need for neighborhood serving businesses that a CN zoning district will allow for. With the subject property's proximity to North Main Street to the east, the area has already seen a variety of change. The second possible challenge is that a portion of a neighboring residence is located on the western side of subject property and is legally non-conforming as it has been there since 2000. The proposed zone change would necessitate the construction of an opaque fence between the residence to the west and businesses located on the subject property. According to Section 502 of the Zoning Ordinance, there can be no fewer than 10 feet between the proposed use and a residence. There is currently a 4’ chain link fence between the building on the subject property and the neighboring residence to the west.

Staff believes that the CN zoning in this area is compatible with the surrounding area. As previously mentioned, the lower intensity commercial opportunities that are allowed within this zoning district have high potential to be an asset to the neighborhood in both the short and long term. While not all types of commercial activities would be appropriate for this particular property, given the lot size and proximity to the neighborhood and other lower intensity businesses, staff believes some lower intensity neighborhood serving businesses would be a fit that is compatible with the surrounding area. Since this particular zone change is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plan, there is no need for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to approve this request. Staff does not believe the impact on the natural environment will be detrimentally affected through the approval of this zone change. Staff is unable to find any negative environmental consequences that will result from this zone change. Given that semi-industrial uses are not allowed within CN zoning, the zone change will not bring about the noises and odors often associated with a heavier commercially zoned district. Staff also believes this zone change request has potential to serve a community need in this particular area, even given the example of the applicant’s desire to locate a tax service business there. Other businesses that would be a fit for the same property include those of a

community services nature and a small new or used retail sales and services business such as product repair, for example (since the property is relatively small) to name just a few. Staff finds that a CN zoning district on the subject property will create an orderly development pattern that is consistent with the surrounding area. CG/CH, RS-2, CG, and CN zoning currently borders the RS-1 properties. Staff feels anything more intensive in this area has the potential to upset this balance and encroach into a long standing neighborhood. This neighborhood has been zoned residential since at least 1939 and has experienced, for the most part, a sensible mix of zoning around it. Staff finds it necessary to protect and promote the current and future growth of this neighborhood and the introduction of CN zoning will allow this to occur while serving the needs of the residents of this neighborhood both now and in the future. The goals of infill and walk-able development are highly in line with the City's Comprehensive Plan and are in harmony with the neighborhood. Lastly, it is possible that this development may serve to aid in future area development. Proposed Conditions

N/A



property; aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision Map

highlighting the subject property; and draft minutes from January 28, 2013 Planning

Commission meeting; and draft Ordinance

Presentation: Roxanne Johnston, Planner

Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (01/21/13)

MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, January 28, 2013 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OF THE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

PRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones, Bill Wynne

ABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE) STAFF: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Jeff Hintz, Planner Kevin Boyd, Planner Roxanne Johnston, Planner

D. Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-

1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for a tax service business as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property:

1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast

intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo.

Roxanne Johnston, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. Ms. Johnston noted that there were 13 notifications sent out on this request, with 0 returned in favor or in opposition to the request. The subject property is a residential structure, which sits on the edge of a neighborhood and near Main Street, which has a mix of zoning district types. There are also some empty lots in this area. The eastern section of the subject property terminates at an alley bifurcating the neighborhood, creating a triangular shaped property. There is a single-family residential area in and around this location, and the residential usage of the area dates back to 1939. The subject property is located on the fringe of an RS-1 neighborhood. The desire is to have a tax service business at this location. There are several zoning districts within a 1/2 mile of this location. A CN zoning district would be compatible with the plans and policies of the city. She again referred to the need and appropriateness for a buffer between the mix of uses nearby and this large residential area. The concept of "neighborhood" is for low-impact business, of which this is one. CN is the least intensive type of commercial zoning. The small lot size does limit naturally the types of businesses which could locate on the lot. However, the scale of a neighborhood center would be appropriate. There is a CN zone currently in existence less than 35' from the subject property. The zone change does trigger placement of a 6' opaque privacy fence to screen from the residential area nearby. The request is consistent with the Vision Plan map as well as the city plans and criteria outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Businesses that are allowed in CN allow small new or used retail sales or services, along with office usage. More intensive zoning

would potentially upset the balance and encroach into a large and long-established neighborhood. Darlene Jones asked if this business would strictly be a business or if it would also be a residential use. It was responded that it would be allowed to be a business only - this type of zoning would not allow residential living. Jennifer Boggs also asked a couple of questions regarding the parking. Fortunately, the floor-area ratio limit for this site would limit much of an additional expansion, meaning that parking would not likely need to increase by more than one space in the future. The proponent, Abel Fernandez, came forward and spoke in favor of this request. He stated that he does not currently have any employees. Joe Grimes asked if the stipulations that were required were fine with the applicant. Mr. Fernandez expressed his acceptance of the requirements. No one else came forward to speak on this request. Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Darlene Jones and seconded by Joe Grimes. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7’, in north central San Angelo; changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 13-04: Abel Fernandez





by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupies the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo; shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District.





SEVERABILITY:

The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.



INTRODUCED on the 19 day of February, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 5th day of March, 2013.


____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:


City of San Angelo

Memo



From: Kevin Boyd, Planner

Subject: Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation, a request for a zone change from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) to allow for activities allowed within MH zoning districts, on the following property:

Location: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of

Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property Heavy

Manufacturing (MH).

Contacts: COSA Development Corporation, owner 325-653-7197 Kevin Boyd, Planner 325-657-4210


Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE

OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from

2

Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


(1) Approve the proposed zone change as requested; or (2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in

which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or

(3) Deny the proposed zone change. Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change.


General Information

Existing Zoning: Light Manufacturing (ML) Existing Land Use: Undeveloped land Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: Light Manufacturing (ML) Angelo Achieves West: Light Manufacturing (ML) Undeveloped land South: Unincorporated Undeveloped land East: Light Manufacturing (ML) Undeveloped land

Thoroughfares/Streets: FM 380 is classified as an ‘arterial street’ which is

designed to be a major thoroughfare that carries heavy traffic to points of interest throughout the city.

Gateway Drive is classified as a "local street" and

is designed to carry light traffic at lower speeds and generally connects to collector streets.

Zoning History: The property was annexed into the city in

November 1997 and later rezoned to Light Manufacturing (ML) in December 1997, refer to case Z 97-51.

3

Applicable Regulations: 316.B.1 of the Zoning Ordinance states, ..."If the

uses routinely subject the surrounding area to noxious or malodorous impacts, they are considered heavy manufacturing and production.."

Development Standards: All required off-street parking and the

connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved.

Vision Plan Map: Industrial Related Comp Plan Excerpts: Intent of Industrial in the Comprehensive

Plan is to, “[dedicate areas for] supporting the local economy while mitigating some of their potentially undesirable secondary effects on nearby residences.”

Industrial section goal one of the

Comprehensive Plan is to "Organize LULUs (Locally Undesirable Land Uses) into clusters." The purpose of this goal is to: "Cluster potentially hazardous industries into a limited number (given the size of San Angelo) of larger, isolated areas will minimize negative effects on residential areas, while balancing access to these businesses within the region, rather than putting all of them into one location."

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning to a more intensive industrial district has the potential to generate additional traffic than if the property remained as-is. However, given the limited number of visitors to industrial zoned properties, and ease of access to the highway for transport, staff is not concerned with the development of this property as heavy industrial.

Parking Requirements: Vary depending upon the use of the property, see

Section 511. Parking Provided: Currently, no parking exist on the site, though it is

a sizable tract.

4

Density: Predominantly large tracts of undeveloped land in

the surrounding areas. The Vision Plan also calls for a continuation of the future development of this area as Industrial, creating an industrial hub.



Analysis:

In order to approve this zone change request, the Planning Commission members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible







5


The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. The zone change request was initiated in an effort to market the properties to various industrial opportunities. The 89 acre tract consists of three adjacent properties zoned Light Manufacturing (ML), and are part of the City’s Business and Industrial Center –located in the northeast part of town. Generally speaking, the proposal for Heavy Manufacturing (MH) will allow for the most intense and noxious possible within the city limits. Given the extreme nature of allowed uses, careful consideration was given in formulating this recommendation. The Vision Plan envisions the subject property, and areas to the north, east and west to remain 'industrial'. Industrial allows for clustering potentially hazardous industries into limited, isolated parts of the city. Although portions to the south calls for neighborhood development, no residences currently exist along FM 280 or anywhere within 3/4 of a mile of the site. This particular property is isolated from the surrounding area through the large tracts of land in the area. Loud noises and the occasional odd smells that may potentially be emitted from property are not likely to bother neighboring properties, given their distance from the site. After carefully assessing the factors to the proposal for a zone change, staff has determined that such a location would be appropriate for intense uses, for this and other reasons articulated below. A zone change from ML to MH is an appropriate transition given the location of the site. In some respect, the two zoning districts are similar in terms of allowed uses. One exception is that MH provides opportunities for heavy processing and manufacturing that is inherently noxious and dangerous due to the chemicals or processes involved. Other uses allowed in MH zoning include warehouse and freight movement, wholesale trade, heavy manufacturing and production and fabrication of wearing apparel including boots and shoes, and mining and waste-related uses as conditional uses. Since the site is several miles from populated areas, noxious sounds and odors will likely go unnoticed by a vast majority of people who visit and live within San Angelo. This request for MH zoning is compatible with much of the surrounding area. The land surrounding the site remains largely undeveloped and varies from open plains to a mix of light to heavy brush. Two noticeable nearby structures are Angelo Achieves, which occupies the property directly to the north, and a vacant distribution center at the intersection of North Loop 306 Frontage and Venture Drive. In November 2012, City Council approved a request for a "Major Entertainment Event" to temporarily develop a tract on the properties immediately north of the subject property, for the Lucas Oil Track. No other structures exist within 1/2 a mile of the site. The fact that the site is in one of the most isolated and undeveloped areas allows COSADC opportunities to develop the site for the most intensive uses, with the least potential impacts.

6

As referenced above, ML and MH zoning districts are very similar. The exception is that MH zoning allows for greater flexibility in the intent as it relates to intensity and the level of noxious uses allowed. Heavy manufacturing and production, for example, is allowed in MH zoning. In ML districts, no vibrations can be produced which are transmitted through the ground at any point beyond the lot line. There are also measures to reduce noise and emission of airborne particles. Conceivably, with a more intense MH zoning, these uses would be allowed, subject to applicable state and federal environmental regulations in regards to environmental quality.

Depending on the intensity of the use, the transition may have an effect on the natural environment. Staff believes that efforts to cluster these high intense uses into a few isolated areas follows the goal of the Comprehensive Plan, and diminishes potential for any unforeseen negative impacts. A zoning of this intensity would not normally be appropriate near areas identified as ‘Neighborhood’ but it has, for some time, been planned and dedicated for intense industrial uses (for many of the reasons mentioned above), staffs feels the proposed zoning is appropriate. The site measures over 2,300 feet from any significant water feature – the nearest is the Concho River, which flow west to east into the O.H. Ivie Reservoir (away from the city). Due to isolation of this property and the area in general, staff is confident that there will be a suitable buffer from residential development. The community needs zoning districts that are this intense in nature to be isolated from residences and highly trafficked areas. Few people will ever see the outdoor storage that is possible in this zoning district, and those who are subjected to it are not residences but rather industrial users of property themselves. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to buffer residences from the tendency of industry to have outdoor storage of materials and goods. The request is consistent with aspects of the Vision Plan and as such, will not require amendment to the plan. In the manufacturing and production field, materials and freight need quick access to highways for transport to other locations. There are not many areas in the city that are isolated from residences and that provide for quick access to a highway, which is vital in the manufacturing field. North Loop 306, a freeway, measures less than 1/3 of a mile, to the west of the site. Still, given its short distance from the Loop – it is somewhat removed from the thoroughfare (separated by a 55 acre tract zoned for ML) and is an ideal fit for the most noxious of uses, which shields potential effects from passing motorists along the freeway. The request also offers a nice transition of permissible uses (ML zoning between the highway and the proposed MH district), in that regard. The property is near the edge of the city-limits – positioned nearly 2,000 feet to the east of the boundary – which allows for easy access to routes that led outside of the city. Quick access to the highway system, while not abutting highly trafficked residential or commercial thoroughfares, makes this one of the safest locations within the city limits to locate heavy industries.

7

Proposed Conditions

N/A


Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; Aerial photo, highlighting subject property; Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting

the subject property; Excerpt of the favor/opposition notification map; Citizen Response; Draft minutes from 02/18/13 Planning Commission meeting;

and Draft Ordinance.

Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (02/11/13)

9

10

11

12

D. Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation A request for approval of a zone change from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy

Manufacturing (MH) to allow for activities allowed within MH zoning districts, on the following property:

1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway

Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo.

Kevin Boyd, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. One notification was required to be sent, and one was received in opposition to the request. Mr. Boyd described the subject property and its general location in the city. Mr. Boyd explained that the rquest complies with the Vision Plan Map, which calls for "Industrial" at this location. The Economic Development Staff, working as representatives for the San Angelo Development Corporation, made this request because they are looking to diversify the offerings of the Industrial Park. MH zoning is very similar to the current ML zoning, but the section being considered for this change is very remote (not highway frontage), and allows more flexibility and higher intensity. This is one of the most isolated and undeveloped parts of the city, and it would allow opportunities to develop as originally intended, far removed from neighborhoods and commercial corridors. Mr. Boyd explained that another rationale for approval is the fact that the property being proposed is not within the direct line of site Bob Schneeman, the Interim Director of Economic Development, came forward to speak in favor of this request. The infrastructure improvements in this area were done in 2004, but little interest has so far been seen for developing the area. The influx of oilfield-related activity prompted Economic Development and COSADC to re-examine the allowed uses at this site in order to better bring activity to it - as initially intended. There are a significant amount of deed restrictions on the property in addition to the zoning. Those could not be changed without approval of the property owners, and there is a design committee that oversees all development within the Industrial Park. They are willing to work with the property owner who wrote in as opposition, to skirt their property and to site operations appropriately. There has been interest from some businesses about locating in this park. Mr. Schneeman also expressed that there is some natural buffering due to a rather large drainage easement that would prohibit buildings to be placed within it. In addition, there are plans for a street to be extended to the east, which would also create a buffer to the owner in opposition. As such, mitigation of negative impacts should be greatly reduced as opposed to most properties. Mr. Schneeman outlined some of the deed restrictions that are in place, prohibiting things such as feed lots, rendering plants, height restrictions (cell towers, for example), among other things. There was some additional discussion of the potential uses allowed in MH districts and the specific use standards of ML districts that are different from MH district regulations. There was also a question of utilizing a "buffer zone" for this business,

but staff reminded the Commission that zoning changes cannot carry conditions with them. There were several questions asked of staff regarding the potential for future uses at this location. John Dugan, with the Chamber of Commerce, came forward to speak in favor of this request, stating that there were several types of interests in this location that would not work under the current zoning. This would make the property more attractive. No one else came forward to speak in favor of this request. HR Wardlaw came forward to speak in opposition to this request, stating that the neighbor in this area needed to be "made whole" and that endangering this particular property owner was not the correct approach. He also stated that the original intent of the park was to function as an office park. He asked the Commission to keep the zoning as it is today. Bill Wynne stated that the nearby business's issues could potentially be handled via an air conditioning system. Jennifer Boggs discussed that the discussions about the potential legal ramifications (privately) were not the responsibility of the Commission members to oversee and handle/enforce. Joe Grimes explained that the Chamber, COSADC, Eco Dev, exist to bring in revenue to the city and market it in a way that brings industry into town rather than pushing it out into Tom Green County. Bill Lawrence considered the fact that, to have this industry somewhere in San Angelo, it should be considered where the most appropriate place is in the city. Bill Lawrence also suggested that replatting could change the boundaries, and staff agreed that it would, but that it would have to precede any change of zoning. Motion, to approve, was made by Bill Wynne and seconded by Joe Grimes. The motion passed by a motion of 4-1, with Darlene Jones in opposition to the change.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation





by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) District.











____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:


City of San

Angelo

Memo




Subject: Z 13-07: COSA Planning A request for approval of a zone change from a Planned

Development (PD) zoning district to Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as defined in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance on the following property:

Location: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end

of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property RS-1

Contacts: Roxanne Johnston, Planner 325-657-4210 Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an

Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 13-07: COSA Planning

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE

WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The City Council may: (1) Approve this zone change request from PD to RS-1 which would allow for

“Household Living” as allowed in RS-1 zoning districts; or (2) Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion,

in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or (3) Deny this zoning request from PD to RS-1.

Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed Zone Change. On February 18, 2013, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a unanimous vote of 5-0.


PD 06-01 was approved by City Council on June 20, 2006, which encompassed this property and others that have since been rezoned to RS-1 on January 17, 2012 (cases Z11-23 & Z11-24). This Planned Development called for several community areas and single family residences that must generally conform to an RS-1 (Single Family Residential) District. The original developer of this PD has since gone out of business and the property has reverted back to the bank and then was recently sold to a private buyer. The subject property is the last remaining section of this Planned Development District. Originally, a clubhouse, pool, and other private amenities were proposed to go along with the 118 single family home sites within this area and even more sites beyond. The intent was for it to function as a gated community. Once the developer went through the

bankruptcy process, First Financial Bank took control of the properties in this area which had been under that developer's ownership. In December of 2011 the Planning Commission approved a zone change on adjacent properties making up this Planned Development, resulting in a Single Family Residential (RS-1) zoning district. The bank did not wish to pursue a clubhouse and other amenities on the subject property and the homeowners association is defunct, so staff believes a RS-1 zoning classification gives future developers the best opportunity to make use of the property at the highest and best use. General Information

Existing Zoning: Planned Development (PD) Existing Land Use: Vacant property Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: RM-1 undeveloped property West: R & E;

County undeveloped property

South: R & E undeveloped property East: RS-1 undeveloped property, vacant lots

& residences

Thoroughfares/Streets: Twin Mountain Drive is defined as an “arterial” street which is designed to connect collector streets to freeways and carries large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the prime function of these streets.

Zoning History: The area was annexed into the City in April

of 2006. PD 06-01 was established June 20, 2006. This land was previously zoned Ranch & Estate (R & E).

Applicable Regulations: Section 212.A.2.d. “An application for an amendment of the

Official Zoning Map…shall only be filed by… the Planning Director, acting in his/her capacity as technical advisor to the Planning Commission.”

Development Standards: Zoning Ordinance Section 501.A. Minimum Lot Area – 5,000 sq ft

Minimum Lot Dimensions – 50x100 Minimum Front Yard – 25 ft Minimum Side Yard – 5 ft Minimum Rear Yard – 20 ft Maximum Floor Area Ratio – 0.4 (40%) Maximum Height – 35 ft Vision Plan Map: Neighborhood

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: There are currently no traffic concerns as

this area has not been developed and has no “local” streets. Twin Mountain Drive currently ends at the northeast section of the subject property. Once the northern section of the property is developed, Twin Mountain Drive is projected to lie along the northern boundary of the subject property and will be an arterial which will connect with Sherwood Way to the northwest.

The impact of future local streets will be determined as the area is subdivided and plans are submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The property experiences a variety of terrain, elevation, and washes that will certainly be impacted by any development.

Parking Requirements: Zoning Ordinance Section 511.B. Two off-street parking spaces are required

for each single-family residence. Section 511.D.1. “All required off-street parking spaces shall

be located on the same lot or tract of land as the building and/or activity they are intended to serve”

Section 511.F.3. “All areas used for required off-street parking

shall be paved” Density: The property is currently undeveloped with

no internal street access. Low density residential property lies to the north and east.

Notification Required: Yes

Notifications Sent: 13 Responses in Favor: 2 Responses in Opposition: 0

Analysis:

In order to approve this Zone change request, City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible








The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below.

Given the history of this property stated above whereby the original developer went out of business, a zone change to Single Family Residential would better fall in line with the plans, policies and Zoning Ordinance adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council. There are several reasons for this to hold true. To begin with, there is currently no financial backing to ensure the development of the several community buildings and open spaces

originally planned for in the Planned Development (PD) would occur. Either way, the development standards for both categories of residential zoning (PD and RS-1) are very similar. Section 306.B.2 of the Zoning Ordinance states, ”It is intended that PD Districts conform as closely as possible to established zoning and subdivision regulations…” Both zoning districts (the PD currently in place and the proposed RS-1rezone) require the same setback and height requirements as well as signage, landscaping and off-street parking. By doing nothing to the zoning, the property is not as consistent with surrounding zoning as it would be if it were rezoned to RS-1. Future developers may have a hard time developing since this is currently a remnant from the original PD. A requirement of any PD is that the original plans approved as a condition of the PD be adhered to and any changes would require a review. Section 210.H.1 of the Zoning Ordinance states, “No building permit may be issued and no construction or development requiring a building permit and situated within a PD District may commence unless a site plan has been approved for that phase of the project that is consistent with the approved concept plan. A site plan that is not consistent with the approved concept plan and specific PD District ordinance shall not be approved.” These statements illustrates that conditions of the PD must be met. This is virtually impossible now given the changed circumstances now that the PD no longer exists in its entirety, so current zoning creates a special circumstance that could keep the area from developing and could make land transactions less attractive to prospective buyers who would want to create their own plans. These developers may not wish to contribute to the required common areas as originally envisioned when the development was first conceived. Staff feels that a zone change would continue to be in line with the Comprehensive Plan’s Vision map which calls for neighborhood in this area. Additionally, staff feels that a zone change continues to address community need, as it does under the current zoning, for creating residential opportunities here. As such, an amendment to the Vision Plan would not be required with this particular request. Although the original PD plan encompassed a large section beyond the subject property, it theoretically would have ensured more consistency with regard to building, street, and general layout design and design concepts than a usual RS-1 zone would. As previously mentioned, the development standards would not change as a result of a zone change. Therefore, one could argue that there can now be a mix of development concepts in the area which could allow for more diverse home stock. So far the development that has occurred since the recent zone changes to

surrounding the property has yielded in thoughtful and consistent development patterns, which is what the Zoning Ordinance seeks to create. It is possible, too, that new development patterns on the subject property could actually result in fewer residential lots than originally planned. For example, it is conceivable that a land-owner of the subject property would wish to keep the property in its natural state. Again, any development occurring within the proposed zoning district would be required to adhere to RS-1 development standards, so there is no chance of over-developing the subject property. This would also ensure consistent development patterns as directed in Criteria 7. Furthermore, Criteria 2 would be met because an amendment here would be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. It would also be compatible with surrounding zoning and therefore meets the objective of Criteria 3.

In addressing environmental impacts resulting from this rezoning; second only to Ranch & Estate zoning districts (R&E), RS-1 creates the least use demand on the property. Whereas no heavier use zoning is planned for this area in the Vision Plan, any development or future subdivisions will most likely be reviewed by the City to ensure that environmental impacts are minimized. Also, until plans are made for the vacant property, it would not be possible to forecast the direct environmental impacts on this property that enjoys a variety of open space, gullies and topographic changes. With either zoning (PD or RS-1), this uncertainty would remain the same. To summarize, staff feels a zone change from PD to RS-1 on the subject property meets with all of the above criteria which include conformity with the Zoning Ordinance, plans and policies, compatibility with the surrounding area, and corrects changed conditions that resulted from the end of the original PD agreements. This proposal also does not create additional adverse impacts on the property than would the PD, it meets a community need by not requiring surrounding property owners to pay for the amenities and Homeowner’s Association fees set forth in the original PD plan, and ensures logical and consistent development patterns to protect the area from over development. Lastly, a zone change will most likely result in a logical and consistent pattern of residential development.

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location

within the City of San Angelo; excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject

property;

aerial photo, highlighting subject property; excerpt from the Comprehensive Plan Vision map

highlighting the subject property; original PD concept plan; notification map highlighting responses from

neighboring properties; citizen response letters; draft minutes from February 18, 2013 Planning

Commission meeting; and, draft Ordinance.

Presentation: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (02/11/13)

MINUTE RECORD OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MONDAY, February 18, 2013 AT 9:00 AM IN THE SOUTH MEETING ROOM OF THE SAN ANGELO CONVENTION CENTER, 500 RIO CONCHO DRIVE, SAN ANGELO, TEXAS PRESENT: Joe Grimes, Bill Lawrence, Jennifer Boggs, Darlene Jones, Bill Wynne ABSENT: Sebastian Guerrero (AE), Sam Tambunga (AE) STAFF: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner Kevin Boyd, Planner Roxanne Johnston, Planner

C. Z 13-07: COSA Planning A request for approval of a zone change from a Planned Development (PD)

zoning district to Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as defined in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance on the following property:

An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain

Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo.

Roxanne Johnston, Planner, came forward to present this request, consistent with the staff recommendation of approval. 13 notifications were sent out on this request, 3 of which were returned in favor. There were no notifications returned in opposition to this request. Ms. Johnston gave some background on the area. Ms. Johnston explained that there is one remaining piece of this PD that remains in this area. The original plan called for a gated community, an HOA, and additional community amenities. Ms. Johnston explained the complications for each individual lot and individual owner, due to these requirements. This change has taken place throughout the other two pieces of the original PD district, and this would simply be the last piece, restoring all of the area to an RS-1 district, which is consistent with the Vision Plan Map category of "Neighborhood". The proposal is in line with development of the area, and activity in this area (by single, individual property owners, not an HOA) is increasing. All development must adhere to RS-1 development standards, so it would be consistent with the surrounding neighborhoods in the same general vicinity. There were no questions. No one came forward to speak in favor of this request. No one came forward to speak in opposition of this request. Motion, to approve as presented, was made by Jennifer Boggs and seconded by Bill Wynne. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family Residential (RS-1) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 13-07: COSA Planning





by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead, in southwest San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from a Planned Development (PD) to a Single Family Residential (RS-1) District;, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Single Family Residential (RS-1) District.











____________________________________

Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST:


Page 1

City of San Angelo Office of the City Clerk




Subject: Agenda Item for March 5th Council Meeting


Caption: Regular Item

First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending established boundaries of Single Member District 1


Summary: The City Council adopted two ordinances incorporating newly annexed areas in SMD 1. a. The public hearings were held on January 22, 2013 and February 5, 2013 and adopted an

ordinance on February 5, 2013. The area annexed is 20 acres located west/southwest of the city at about the southern corner of the intersection of U.S. Highway 67 (Sherwood Way) and a southward projection of Appaloosa Trail, adjacent and contiguous to the present corporate limits of the city. The area is uninhabited and situated adjacent to an apartment development currently undergoing construction.

b. The public hearings were held on February 5, 2013 and March 5, 2013 and adopted an ordinance on March 5, 2013. The area annex is 8.995 acres located west/southwest of the city at about northwest of mills pass drive, east of Community of Faith subdivision and southwest of Sam’s Club addition, adjacent and contiguous to the present corporate limits of the city. The area is uninhabited and situated adjacent to a growing residential subdivision.

As part of the submission under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the annexations update and change to the established boundaries of single member districts shall be cleared through the Department of Justice. Both areas are uninhabited. The City will comply with all necessary requirements for the submission by adoption of this ordinance.

Financial Impact: None. Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends updating the established boundary of SMD #1. Attachments: Annexation Map A and B, Proposed Ordinance, and Revised 2013 SMD Map


WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo is a Home Rule municipal corporation operating under a municipal charter that has been adopted as authorized by Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution; and,

WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of San Angelo Charter, Section 3 entitled “Annexation”, the City Council shall have the power, after public hearing, of fixing the boundaries of the City of San Angelo and to annex additional territory by ordinance; and

WHEREAS, on February 5, 2013 and March 5, 2013, the City Council adopted Ordinances #2013-02-021 and #2013-03-034, annexing certain uninhabited areas into the City of San Angelo; and

WHEREAS, it is now necessary to incorporate such areas into a Single Member District within the City of San Angelo in order to ensure future new residents of the right to vote; and

WHEREAS, changes in single member districts constitute a change from prior practices requiring preclearance under the Federal Voting Rights Act.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

SECTION 1: RECITALS INCORPORATED. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Resolution as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2: DESIGNATION OF ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES: The boundaries of Single Member District 1 be, and are hereby, amended as set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

SECTION 3: SUBMISSIONS TO THE UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: The City Clerk of the City of San Angelo, or her authorized agent, shall make such submissions as are necessary to the United State Justice Department to seek pre-clearance approval.

SECTION 4: NECESSARY ACTIONS: The Mayor and the City Clerk, in consultation with the City Attorney, are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary or appropriate to comply with the provisions of the San Angelo Code of Ordinances, the Texas Election Code and any other Texas State or federal law in carrying out and designating established single member district boundaries for District 1, as amended, whether or not expressly authorized herein and all such actions of City officials previously taken for said purposes are hereby ratified.

SECTION 5: SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 6: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective from and after adoption of this ordinance.

INTRODUCED on the 5th day of March, 2013, and finally PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the 19th day of March, 2013.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS _________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST: _________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form:

_________________________ __________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

EXHIBIT “A”

DESCRIPTION OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 1

FOR SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

BY 2010 U. S. CENSUS P. L. 94-171 TRACT AND BLOCK

TRACT / BLOCK TRACT / BLOCK TRACT / BLOCK 001304 4008 001303 5006 001303 1004 001304 4003 001101 1075 001101 1025 001304 2000 001101 1114 001101 1084 001101 1097 001101 1053 001101 1104 001101 1041 001707 1044 001707 2039 001101 1045 001101 1027 001101 1036 001303 3005 001707 1011 001707 1026 001707 1043 001707 1010 001706 1030 001304 2005 001303 3003 001303 2005 001303 3008 001303 2001 001303 5005 001303 5002 001304 4007 001707 1021 001707 2023 001707 1042 001707 1032 001706 1014

001706 1034 001706 1023 001706 1037 001706 1020 001704 2187 001101 1087 001101 1046 001101 1065 001706 1038 001707 1002 001101 2008 001301 6003 001101 1089 001101 1095 001101 1096 001101 3004 001101 2004 001200 6039 001303 3006 001301 7014 001101 1109 001707 2016 001706 1011 001706 1018 001706 1041 001706 1019 001707 2037 001101 1010 001304 1005 001707 2038 001707 1001 001707 1012 001101 1069 001101 1068 001101 1118 001101 1078 001303 1010

001101 1098 001101 1099 001301 7006 001707 1015 001704 2182 001101 2002 001303 1008 001200 6038 001101 1081 001101 1092 001707 2029 001101 1064 001301 7007 001707 1008 001301 7002 001101 1112 001101 1060 001101 2009 001101 2001 001301 7000 001304 1000 001101 1011 001101 1009 001101 3002 001101 1023 001707 1034 001101 1103 001303 2008 001303 3010 001101 1115 001101 2007 001101 2000 001101 1091 001101 1111 001303 4002 001101 1090 001303 2003

001303 2006 001303 4005 001303 1001 001704 1095 001707 1033 001707 1028 001706 1027 001706 1032 001707 1018 001707 1016 001303 1000 001303 2012 001101 1083 001303 3009 001303 1003 001303 2011 001303 2002 001303 2007 001303 1002 001707 2031 001101 1055 001707 1006 001706 1008 001707 1017 001101 1086 001101 1082 001101 1113 001101 1057 001704 2000 001101 3001 001303 1006 001303 1007 001304 2004 001304 4006 001707 1038 001706 1013 001706 1042 001303 5009 001303 2009 001706 1002 001707 1009 001706 1029 001707 1039 001706 1026 001706 2002

001707 2019 001303 1005 001303 4009 001707 2015 001707 2013 001101 1074 001707 2026 001303 3001 001304 4005 001101 1035 001707 1005 001707 1031 001706 1016 001706 1025 001706 1033 001704 2180 001301 7013 001301 7003 001101 1038 001101 1101 001101 1088 001304 2002 001706 1028 001707 2014 001304 4000 001707 2011 001707 2028 001101 1061 001707 2032 001704 2184 001101 3003 001101 2006 001101 2005 001101 2003 001101 1100 001101 1106 001303 2004 001707 1027 001704 2001 001707 2025 001303 1009 001304 4001 001301 7005 001704 2183 001101 3000

001304 1009 001101 1048 001101 1116 001101 1049 001707 2033 001707 2034 001704 2179 001707 1000 001707 1013 001706 1001 001101 1108 001303 5001 001303 3012 001303 4008 001303 4003 001303 4000 001101 1042 001304 2001 001704 1079 001704 1115 001707 1003 001707 1030 001706 1007 001706 1009 001706 1022 001706 1040 001707 2021 001101 1026 001101 1117 001304 4002 001704 2186 001303 5008 001303 4004 001303 4010 001704 2181 001704 2185 001706 1003 001707 2018 001101 1059 001101 1105 001101 1058 001303 4006 001304 1006 001304 1008 001707 1040

001303 5004 001304 4004 001707 2012 001707 1037 001707 1035 001704 1094 001706 1006 001706 1010 001707 1022 001707 1024 001706 1031 001707 1036 001706 1012 001706 1015 001101 1024 001101 1054 001707 1020 001101 1077 001101 1067 001101 1110 001303 3007 001304 2003 001707 1019 001301 7004 001101 1076 001101 1050 001101 1051 001303 3011 001303 3000 001101 3005 001303 3002 001101 1094 001101 1107 001303 4011 001303 5000 001303 5003 001303 4007 001706 1024 001706 1000 001707 2027 001706 1039 001707 2009 001706 1005 001101 1102

001101 3006 001303 2010 001704 1068 001706 1004 001707 1014 001101 1093 001101 1071 001101 1070 001101 1056 001303 3013 001101 1063 001707 1007 001707 1029 001707 1025 001707 2017 001706 1017 001706 1021 001706 1036 001704 1096 001707 2022 001706 1035 001101 1047 001707 1004 001707 1023 001101 1066 001101 1079 001101 1080 001101 1072 001707 2036 001707 2020 001707 2010 001303 3004 001303 4001 001303 2000 001303 5007 001101 1085 001101 1073 001101 1044

City of San Angelo



From: Ricky Dickson, Interim Water Utilities Director


Contact: Ricky Dickson, Water Utilities Director, 657-4209

Caption: Update on the design and construction activities for the Hickory Water Supply Project

Summary: Hutch Musallam with Carollo Engineers will give an update on the status of the Hickory Water Supply projects currently under design and the projects currently in construction. History: Construction on the first Hickory project began in the Fall of 2011 with the Well Field Pipelines project. This project has since been completed and two other projects are currently under construction. The projects under construction are the 30” Transmission Main and the Booster Pump Station and Well Field Improvements. Projects currently in the design phase are the Groundwater Treatment Facility and drilling of new wells for the expansion of the well field. Planned projects will include equipping the new wells, extension of well field collector mains, extension of power lines to the new wells, construction of well access roads and installation of an additional pump in the booster pump station.

Financial Impact: N/A Other Information/Recommendation: N/A Attachments: Presentation Presentation: Project update by Hutch Musallam, Carollo Engineers. Publication: None. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Ricky Dickson, Water Utilities Director, March 6, 2013.

1

Progress Report

San Angelo City CouncilSan Angelo City Council

March 19, 2013

Agenda

1. Progress & Schedule Update:T i i M ia. Transmission Main

b. Booster Pump Station & Well Fieldc. Treatmentd. New Groundwater Wells

2 Q estions & Disc ssion

2

2. Questions & Discussion

2

Transmission Main

NTP January 23, 2012 Substantial Completion: July 16, 2013 Final Completion: September 14, 2013 Current status: Dig-Lay-Bury is approximately

80% complete

3

Progress As of March 4, 2013

4

3

Progress Summary

3rd dig-lay-bury crew added through March 14, 2013 t dit d ti i BCV b f2013 to expedite production in BCV areas before nesting season. Work progressing in both directions Valves and appurtenance work ongoing with dig-

l b

5

lay-bury Pressure testing starting soon

Laying Pipe in Rock

6

4

Gate Valve Installation

7

Booster Pump Station & Well Field

NTP: June 18, 2012 Substantial Completion: June 18, 2013 Final Completion: July 17, 2013 Current Status: Approximately 50% complete

8

5

Progress Summary Booster pump cans set, backfill underway Foundations for all well buildings underway mostFoundations for all well buildings underway, most

complete High point and well 6 tank foundations underway. Well cleaning underway

Potential delay to current schedule mainly due to

9

Potential delay to current schedule mainly due to longer than expected time needed to clean and retrofit existing wells

Hickory Wells 1-9 Background

Wells drilled in the 70s Potential obstructions or items identified by the

initial video survey at some wells TCEQ required cleaning of the well casing at

each well along with the removal of debris or b i d i h i i i l id

10

obstructions noted in the initial video survey followed by a new video survey to confirm conditions of wells

6

Conditions of Well

Obstruction in Well 4 has been identified as a packing plug Contractor trying drill and air purge itpacking plug. Contractor trying drill and air purge it out of the well. Obstruction removal and repairs to 3 wells 5 holes in well 7 casing: 1 at 64 feet, 3 at 1,128 feet,

and 1 at 2,062 feet. A sleeve can be swaged in at 64 feet and possibly at 1128 feet, but not at 2062 due to h h d h H l 2062 i

11

the pressure at that depth. Hole at 2062 is completely sealed with grout. Well 1 liner casing slipped. Attempt will be made to

remove the slipped casing.

Setting block for booster pump station electrical building

12

7

Booster Pump Cans

13

Looking East PS & Electrical Building

14

8

Underground electrical at Well 1

15

Groundwater Treatment Plant

Groundwater Treatment Facility Disinfection Facility Associated civil work and piping Project Status:

• RRSS Selection and Design NTP: February 6, 2013

16

g y ,• Overall final design: Anticipated completion

completion April 30, 2013

9

Site Layout

17

Disinfection Facility Groundwater Treatment Facility

Disinfection Facility

18

10

Groundwater Treatment Facility

19


20

Building Dimensions: 208’ – 0” x 133’ – 4”

11


21


22

Building Dimensions:105’ – 4” x 64’ – 44”

12


23

Post Design Key MilestonesAnticipated Dates or Schedule

TWDB/TCEQ Review May 1 2013 through June 30 TWDB/TCEQ Review May 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013

Advertise Project May 16, 2013

Bid Project July 9, 2013

Recommendation of Award & Council Approval

July 9 through July 16, 2013

TWDB R l f F d d NTP A t 1 2013

24

TWDB Release of Funds and NTP August 1, 2013

Substantial Construction Completion for GWTF

July 31, 2014

Final Construction Completion of Project

October 30, 2014

13

New Wells

Regulatory hurdle cleared and clearing, grubbing d i di f l d t i l f ll dand grinding of cleared material of new wells and

ROW complete. Phase 1: Engineering for “Drilling New Wells”

underway. Expected design completion and submittal to TCEQ April 30 2013

25

submittal to TCEQ April 30, 2013 Phase 2: Engineering for “Site Civil, Piping and

Equipping New Wells” will start in May 2013

Questions?

San Angelo City CouncilSan Angelo City Council

March 23, 2013

City of San Angelo Finance Department



From: Steve Mahaffey, Budget Analyst, Sr.


Contact: Steve Mahaffey, Budget Analyst, Sr. 481-2757

Caption: Regular (1st reading) Consent (2nd reading)

First public hearing and introduction of an Ordinance amending the 2012-2013 Budget for new projects, incomplete projects, capital projects and grants.

Summary: This proposed amendment contains the following items (additional information attached):

City of San Angelo Operating Budget

• RLSS Grant for Health Department • Texas Historical Commission Planning/Feasibility Study Grant • Downtown Streetscape Project • Chase State Office Building Maintenance

History: See attached Budget Amendment Request memorandum.

Financial Impact: $490,664 (see attached detail on Exhibit A of the Ordinance)

Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A

Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends approval.

Attachments: Ordinance including Exhibit A; Department request memos

Presentation: N/A

Publication: N/A

Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, ACM/CFO

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2012, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013, FOR NEW PROJECTS, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS.

WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that new projects not included in the current budget should begin, and

WHEREAS the City of San Angelo has determined that certain budgeted amounts should be amended due to project changes and unforeseen circumstances, and

WHEREAS the resources necessary for these changes are available;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:

The City’s budget for fiscal year 2012-2013 be amended by the amounts contained in Exhibit A.

INTRODUCED on the 19th day of March, 2013, and APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the 2nd day of April, 2013.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

__________________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST: __________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Approved as to Content and Form:

__________________________________ Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO

City of San Angelo Proposed Budget Amendment Exhibit A

Fund Number Fund Name

Total Revenue

Amendment

Total Expenditure Amendment

Net Benefit/ (Cost)

COSA Operating Budget

103 Intergovernmental Fund 47,380 47,380 0

105 General Debt Service

Fund 0 220,000 (220,000)

106 South TIRZ Fund 0 93,284 (93,284)

201 State Office Building Fund 0 130,000 (130,000)

Totals 47,380 490,664 (443,284)

City of San Angelo

Proposed Budget Amendment Additional Information

Project/Need Source of Funding Revenue Expense Net Benefit/

(Cost)

RLSS Grant Funds

Department of State Health Services RLSS Grant

22,402 22,402 0

Texas Historical Commission Planning/Feasibility Study Grant

Texas Historical Commission Grant 24,978 24,978 0

Downtown Streetscape Project

South TIRZ Fund-Fund Balance 0 93,284 (93,284)

Chase State Office Building Maintenance

State Office Building Fund - Fund Balance 0 130,000 (130,000)

General Debt Service Fund – Fund Balance 0 220,000 (220,000)

Totals 47,380 490,664 (443,284)

Page 1




From: Laura Brooks, Budget Analyst Sr.


Contact: Morgan Trainer, Finance, 325-653-6291

Caption: Regular Item

Public hearing and consideration of approving and adopting a resolution authorizing the adoption of the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan for the City of San Angelo

Summary: Attached is the final proposed 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City Council must conduct a public hearing on the proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The proposed CIP must be published to the internet and a public notice providing the date and time of the public hearing published within two weeks of the CIP being posted and the CIP Transmittal Letter reinforces the objectives of the CIP as a planning tool and not a funding mechanism. The attached resolution is the final step to adopt the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Submitted projects have been reviewed by the CIP committee. History: Preparation of the 2013-2018 CIP began November 20, 2012 with discussion with City Council. Budget staff provided instruction for division managers to prepare CIP projects December 10, 2012. On December 20, 2012, project managers submitted proposed projects. The committee reviewed projects January 31, 2013. Public meetings were held February 7 and 12, 2013. City Council Discussed the 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) at the strategic planning session February 26, 2013 and at the regular meeting March 5, 2013. Financial Impact: Funding will be discussed during the FY 2013-2014 budget preparation process. Related Vision Item (if applicable): Infrastructure and Financial Visions Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommendations approving the capital improvement plan and adoption of the resolution. Attachments: Proposed 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan, Resolution Presentation: Powerpoint Publication: Notice of this Public Hearing was posted on the website. Reviewed by Service Area Director: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO

City of San Angelo

2013-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PLAN

2013-2018

Capital Improvement

Plan

City Council Alvin New, Mayor

Paul Alexander, SMD #1 Dwain Morrison, SMD #2 Johnny Silvas, SMD #3 Kendall Hirschfeld, SMD #5 Charlotte Farmer, SMD #6

City Management Daniel Valenzuela, City Manager

Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager for Community Services Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

Capital projects are prepared by the staff member identified within each project sheet

Capital Improvement Plan preparation:

Morgan Trainer, Budget Manager Laura Brooks, Senior Budget Analyst

Steven Mahaffey, Senior Budget Analyst

Introduction of the Capital Improvement Plan February 21, 2013

Public Hearing March 5, 2013 Plan Adoption March 19, 2013

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

This page was intentionally left blank

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

March 6, 2013 Dear Citizens,

The 2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is the seventh annual CIP completed by the City of San Angelo. The citizens approved a change to the city’s charter in November 2007 to require the preparation of a CIP every year.

Overview The plan identifies the capital needs of the city for a five‐year planning period. The CIP is updated annually to reflect the changing needs of the community and address any new issues that impact our community.

The CIP does not appropriate funds, but supports the budget process and the appropriations made through the adoption of the budget. An effective CIP provides for considerable advance notification, planning, evaluation, scope definition, design, public discussion, cost estimation, and financial planning.

The objectives utilized to develop the CIP are:

To preserve and improve the infrastructure of San Angelo;

To identify and examine current and future infrastructure needs and minimize the financial impact on residents;

To maximize the useful life of capital investments by scheduling major renovations and modifications at the appropriate time in the life‐cycle of the facility;

To improve financial planning by comparing needs with resources, and estimating future funding issues;

There are many benefits of having a CIP. First and foremost, it provides an overall perspective for the development pattern of the city, thus enabling the citizens as well as the City Council and staff to take a long‐range view of their future activities and responsibilities. The CIP also highlights the deficiencies of the city and stimulates action to correct them. The plan promotes coordination of projects across City departments and across overlapping governmental jurisdictions. It also allows City staff to more effectively budget operating expenditures each year necessary to maintain new projects and stabilize personnel demands.

Compliance City staff together with public input made every effort to ensure the CIP is compliant with the items mandated in the city charter. Section 59A (attached) from the city charter defines San Angelo’s capital program. This language was truly a cohesive effort drafted by a committee of City staff and citizens. For example the charter states the plan should be an annual effort, outlines what content should be included, requires public hearings, and dictates how the plan should be adopted.

The City Charter sets forth the mandatory elements of a comprehensive capital plan. Those elements include a

A summary,

long‐term goals of the community,

capital improvement expenditures,

cost estimates,

funding source,

estimated annual operating costs,

how the plan sustains San Angelo,

and performance measures.

1

2

3

4

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text


STRATEGIC PLANNING MEETING PRIORITIES

(FEBRUARY 26, 2013)

1. Street maintenance / restoration / illustration

a. Evaluation i. Assess condition

ii. Plan / prioritize iii. Fund iv. Build v. Maintain

vi. Continue to repeat – i. through v. b. Street Condition Study

i. Obtain funding sources to assist with study, i.e. grants ii. Group all streets and categorize/evaluate by useful life and level of work to be

completed: New streets, sealcoat, mill & overlay, and total reconstruct. iii. Based on comprehensive 7 year rotation plan, determine at which level to assign a

street, including associated costs iv. Base prioritization on assessed data and future use v. Implement Comprehensive 7 Year Street Plan

1. Plan will decrease overall CIP cost by 1/5 vi. Work closely with Street & Bridge Department to begin maintenance program

2. Stormwater infrastructure

3. Reduce property tax rate

a. Transition subsidized projects to self funded

b. Utilize additional funds to fund one time projects, i.e. streets, police center, underground stormwater infrastructure

c. Steady government growth related to population

d. Implemented 10 year goal to decrease property tax from 86.86% to 76%.

e. Establish a goal to decrease property tax to 70% and out of the TML Top Ten highest property tax rate for cities over 50K population

5

4. Revenue Retain/wage/maintain staffing

a. Impact of Cline Shale

i. Impact study conducted on Eagle Ford Shale (expands over 20 counties) ii. Projecting increasing sales tax revenues and housing

iii. Potential to create 17k jobs within 7 years iv. San Angelo experiencing increased inflationary factors

1. Must insure organization is running efficiently and directing funds to the appropriate projects

5. Manage organization growth

a. Steady government growth related to population

i. Organization growth where necessary, i.e. public safety

6. Offset value increase with rate reduction

a. Per hotel/motel room

7. Tourism: Onetime projects

a. Wayfinding

i. Establish and implement a uniform plan ii. Utilize HOT to fund

b. Ft. Concho

i. Established a virtual presentation and accomplish more for tourism, i.e. talking mule or buffalo soldier.

c. Ft. Concho maintenance

i. Utilize HOT to fund infrastructure

d. Coliseum Marquee signage

i. Utilize HOT to fund infrastructure

e. Other occupancy tax projects

f. Reserve / rate stabilization

i. Establish reserve funds for major projects, including Hotel Occupancy Tax ii. Establish rate stabilization for known future projects to provide a smooth transition, i.e.

landfill

g. Grantee accountability

i. Establish and implement performance measurements, metrics, and benchmarks ii. Consider long term imaging, incremental increases, image building, continually raising

the bar

h. Create/pursue an image/vision

i. Exceptionalism at all levels

6

j. Chamber partnership i. Establish and implement performance measurements, metrics, and benchmarks

ii. Tangible results iii. Implement a set fee vs. percentage allocation, thereby providing static funds that can be

adjusted

k. Recruit more events, i.e. drag boat races

l. Revenue per room

i. Disclose anomalies ii. Measure/track room rate increase impacts

8. Police Department Facility

a. Restart momentum i. Establish a budget for facility

ii. Consider issuing bond

b. Debt capacity update

9. Economic Development

a. What to incent?

i. Establish criteria on types of business to incentivize 1. Consider preference points to qualify for incentive

ii. Put study in action 1. Continue with discipline on the big study; key points into play

iii. Assist Chamber to complete marketing plan 1. Tailor focus

b. Provide support for local/small business

i. Business Resource Center ii. Human Resources support

iii. Technical support

c. Streamline Housing / building process

i. Expedite regulatory process 1. Make the process quicker to accommodating the customer’s needs, but still

manage staff, i.e. working overtime ii. Permit time objectives

iii. Targeted staffing increases iv. Time studies/objectives v. Productivity benchmarks

d. Brownwood/3M Company Inquiry

e. Short / long term goals

i. Provide assistance to local business to speed up the process ii. Continue with strategic plan process

iii. Continue with Chamber’s marketing plan; accountability

7

f. Economic diversification

i. Build existing businesses to handle low or declining economic periods

g. Sales tax equity – Online vs. Bricks & Mortar

i. Small business online sales ii. Provide service via Business Resource Center

iii. Establish a national presence for local businesses

h. Transportation

i. Air service ii. Regional road issues

iii. Ports to Plains

i. Re-cap report of the various projects and studies

i. Goal progress/ executive summary 1. Dashboard view 2. Requires self discipline to stay on top of these plans

a. Lake Nasworthy Study / Gateway Planning

8

City of San Angelo

2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan

Summary of Projects

Project Type Key: IN= Infrastructure; AP= Airport; COF= City Operation Facilities; CFP‐ Community Facilities & Parks; EN= Environmental Projects; EQ= Equipment; TG= Technology

Project

Type Division Project Title Project Manager

Dedicated/C

ommitted

Funding Proposed Funding Source 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018

Total Project

Costs

IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay‐ Main Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 185,000 185,000

IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay ‐ 14th Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 403,000 403,000

IN Street & Bridge Mill & Overlay ‐ 19th Street Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 378,000 378,000

IN Street & BridgeReconstruction of Bell St from Concho River to Old Ballinger

HwyClinton Bailey N

Undetermined4,800,000 4,800,000

IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St Clinton Bailey NUndetermined

1,300,000 1,300,000

IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St. Clinton Bailey N Undetermined 1,800,000 1,800,000

IN Street & Bridge Reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St. Clinton Bailey N Undetermined 2,500,000 2,500,000

IN Street & BridgeReconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset South to

Railroad TracksClinton Bailey N

Undetermined6,500,000 6,500,000

IN Street & BridgeReconstruction of 29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to 2018 N.

ChadbourneClinton Bailey N

Undetermined2,500,000 2,500,000

INEngineering

ServicesSealcoat Program Clinton Bailey Y

General Fund1,800,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 4,863,000

IN Stormwater Storm Water Quality Improvements Clinton Bailey N Future Stormwater Utility Fee 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 29,300,000

IN Stormwater Sunset Lake Improvements Clinton Bailey Y Stormwater Utility Fee 700,000 700,000

IN Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Ave P Clinton Bailey Y General Fund 1,300,000 2,000,000

IN Water Utilities Avenue D Water Line Replacement Robert Bluthardt Y Water Fund 75,000 25,000 25,000 125,000

IN Water Utilities Automated Meter Reading System Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,250,000 1,250,000 7,550,000

IN Water Utilities Clay Pipe Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 73,997,896

IN Water Utilities Collector Main Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 23,700,000

IN Water Utilities Hickory Water Supply Development Phase I Ricky Dickson Y Water Fund/Type B Sales Tax 37,000,000 30,000,000 120,000,000

IN Water Utilities High Service Pump Station Rehab Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 3,950,000

IN Water Utilities Lift Station Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,720,000

IN Water Utilities Nasworthy Dam Emergency Spillway Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 2,000,000 2,000,000

IN Water Utilities Nasworthy Dam Stop Log Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 750,000 750,000

IN Water Utilities Lake Nasworthy Gate Operators Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 2,216,000 3,250,000

IN Water Utilities Transmission Line Valves Replacement Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,650,000

IN Water Utilities Transmission Mains Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 5,100,000 5,300,000 6,000,000 6,150,000 28,190,000

IN Water Utilities Twin Buttes Eco‐System Restoration Ricky Dickson YWater CIP Fund, Water Fund,State

Soil & Water Board1,000,000

IN Water Utilities Water Billing & Customer Service Office Remodeling Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 500,000 1,000,000

IN Water Utilities Water Main Replacements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 52,761,509

IN Water Utilities Water Reclamation Plant Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,800,000

IN Water Utilities Water Treatment Plant Equipment Improvements Ricky Dickson Y Water CIP Fund 200,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,200,000

IN Water Utilities Wastewater Service to Existing Developed Areas Ricky Dickson Y Wastewater CIP Fund 17,200,000

IN Traffic Operations Replace School Zone and Crosswalk Equipment Shane Kelton YTom Green County Fee

18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 158,000

IN Traffic Operations Sign Reflectivity Upgrade Shane Kelton Y General Fund 56,550 57,681 58,834 60,011 61,211 577,364

60,481,550 52,050,681 15,351,834 13,028,011 8,861,211 402,808,769

AP Airport Apron Joint Seal Luis Elguezabal Y FAA Grant,PFC Fund 54,900 555,555 610,455

AP Airport Runway 3‐21 Lights & Beacon Luis Elguezabal Y FAA Grant,PFC Fund 631,889

AP Airport Airport Terminal Renovation Luis Elguezabal YFAA Grant,PFC Fund,Type B Sales Tax

1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 600,862 6,280,241

COFEmergency

ManagementEOC HVAC Replacement Teresa Covey N

Undetermined500,000 500,000

COF Fire Fire Station 4 Reconstruction Brian Dunn N General Fund C.O. 2,580,000 2,580,000

COF Fire Fire Training Facility Brian Dunn N General Fund C.O., Federal Grant 1,400,000 2,600,000

Level 1 Infrastructure Projects Total

9

City of San Angelo


Summary of Projects


Project


Dedicated/C

ommitted


Total Project

Costs

COF Fort Concho Chase State Office Building Improvements Robert Bluthardt Y State Office Building Fund 200,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 300,000

COF Police Police Boat Storage Dock Tim Vasquez N Undetermined 75,000 75,000

COF Police Mobile Command Center Storage Facility Tim Vasquez N Undetermined 60,000 60,000

COF Police Police Department Administration Building Tim Vasquez N General Fund, General Fund C.O. 25,775,000 25,910,067

CFP Civic Events Auditorium Renovation Angelica Pena Y Type B Sales Tax 2,314,197 3,750,000

CFP Civic Events Fairgrounds Livestock Barn Angelica Pena Y Type B Sales Tax 1,000,000

CFP Civic Events Coliseum Improvements Angelica Pena N Undetermined 60,000 60,000

CFP Civic Events Coliseum Roof Angelica Pena N Undetermined 545,000 545,000

CFP Civic Events Convention Center Improvements Angelica Pena N Undetermined 83,069 119,900

CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Barracks 6 New Floor Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 15,000 15,000

CFP Fort Concho Heating & Cooling Unit Replacements Fort Concho Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 125,000 20,000 15,000 160,000

CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Post Bandstand Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 25,000 25,000

CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho Visitor Center Improvements Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 100,000 750,000 250,000 400,000 1,500,000

CFP Fort Concho Fort Concho OQ1 Rear Room & Roof Repairs Robert Bluthardt N Undetermined 75,000 75,000

CFPDevelopment

ServicesWayfinding Phases I‐III A.J. Fawver N

Undetermined100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000

CFP MPO Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvement Program Doray Hill, Jr. YTransportation Grant, General Fund

1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,000,000

CFP Real Estate/Legal Santa Fe Train Depot Improvements Cindy Preas N Undetermined 21,238 20,000 15,000 22,500 22,500 126,238

CFP Real Estate/Legal Spur Parking Garage Cindy Preas N Undetermined 1,825,000 1,825,000

CFP Parks 29th Street Complex Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 1,650,000 1,650,000

CFP Recreation Community Aquatics Facility MaryAnn Vasquez Y Type B Sales Tax, Donation 3,262,422

CFP Recreation Recreation Center Air Conditioning MaryAnn Vasquez N Undetermined 500,000 500,000

CFP Recreation Youth Soccer Complex at Glenna St MaryAnn Vasquez Y Type B Sales Tax 270,000

CFP Parks Bradford Neighborhood & School Park Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 175,000

CFP Parks Brentwood Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 275,000 275,000

CFP Parks Brown Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 175,000 175,000

CFP Parks Central Control Irrigation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax 110,500

CFP Parks Civic League Park Improvements Carl White Y Grant, Donation 115,000 115,000

CFP Parks Fairmount Cemetery Improvements Phase I Carl White N Donation, Undetermined 600,000 600,000

CFP Parks Hilltop Trail Carl White YGrant, Possible Trust Fund Funding

200,000 200,000

CFP Parks Middle Concho Boat Ramp Carl White YGrant, Possible Trust Fund Funding

471,000 471,000

CFP Parks Red Arroyo Trail Clinton Bailey Y Grant, Type B Sales Tax, Stormwater

Fund, Private Donation400,000 400,000 4,000,000

CFP Parks Rio Vista Neighborhood Park Renovation Carl White YCDBG Funds, Type B Sales Tax,

Donation813,900

CFP Parks Rio Concho Community Park Carl White N Type B Sales Tax, Undetermined 85,000 650,000

CFP Parks Santa Rita Neighborhood Park Renovation Carl White Y Type B Sales Tax, Donation 150,000 150,000

CFP Parks South Concho Boat Ramp Carl White YGrant, Possible Trust Fund Funding

438,600 438,600

CFP Parks Sunken Garden Park Carl White N Undetermined 275,000 275,000

EN ParksConcho River Dredging, Bank Stabilization, & Trail

ImprovementsCarl White Y

Type B Sales Tax, Grants, Stormwater

Fund15,436,647

EQ Public Information Public Information Equipment Replacement Anthony Wilson NGrant, Undetermined

19,874 4,668 5,378 47,856

TG Police Public Communications Technology Upgrade Victor Vasquez N Undetermined, General Fund 120,000 517,000

TG Fire Mobile Data Terminals Brian Dunn N Undetermined 182,600 182,600

10

City of San Angelo


Summary of Projects


Project


Dedicated/C

ommitted


Total Project

Costs

TGInformation

TechnologyServer Upgrades John Eades N

General Fund, Undetermined25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 250,000

TGInformation

TechnologyIBM Power 7 Server John Eades N General Fund, Undetermined 65,000 65,000

34,592,781 11,892,465 2,770,278 2,873,917 1,342,500 84,679,315

95,074,331 63,943,146 18,122,112 15,901,928 10,203,711 487,488,084

Level 2 Other Projects Total

2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Level 1 & 2 Projects Total

11

12

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text


laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

laura.brooks

Typewritten Text

IInnffrraassttrruuccttuurree PPrroojjeeccttss

LEVEL 1

Projects related to Streets, Water, Waste Water, & Storm Water

CCaappiittaall

IImmpprroovveemmeenntt

PPllaann

22001133--22001188

13

City of San Angelo, Texas2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan

Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/14

-$ - 185,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design - Construction - Other -

Total -$

Project Schedule: % Complete100%

0%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 185,000

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - -

185,000$ 14/15

Mill and Overlay of Main St. from Houston Harte to 19th St.Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- - - - Future

ProjectedTotal15/16 16/17 17/18

-

185,000$

Design: December 2012Implementation: April 2013

185,000 -

Mill and overlay is a street maintenance process whereby the top 1"-3" of existing asphalt pavement is removed with a milling machine and a 1"-3" layer of asphalt is placed with a asphalt paver directly over the milled area. Mill and overlay considered a "high-level" preventative maintenance activity or "low-level" reconstruction effort that falls between sealcoat maintenance and full depth reconstruction with respect to overall cost and project complexity. The success of the mill and overlay process is largely dependent upon the condition of the roadway foundation (base course and subgrade). With the roadway foundation in good condition, a mill and overlay can potentially add 10-15 years to the useful life of the roadway.

Supporting planning document(s):

General Fund

Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture…

then find picture in your files… then double click picture to insert.

- -

Reduce overall roadway maintenance

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - -

Performance Measures:

Notes:

Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each project location):Address:

1)

Improve ride quality and reduce future maintenance costs.

Main Street San Angelo TexasStreet Address City State

Completing Project $181,551 Not Completing Project Undetermined

Present Value of Future Cash Flows

14


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 403,000

Description:


Total -$


0%



403,000$ 14/15

Mill and Overlay of 14th St. from Chadbourne St. to Main St.Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- - - - - Total15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

Projected

General Fund



403,000$


403,000 -



- -




Notes:


1)

Completing Project $395,486


Street Address City14th Street


Not Completing Project Undetermined

StateSan Angelo Texas

15


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 378,000

Description:


Total -$


0%



378,000$ 14/15

Mill and Overlay of 19th St. from Bryant Blvd. West to Concho RiverEngineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- - - - - Total15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

Projected

General Fund



378,000$


378,000 -



- -




Notes:


1)

Completing Project $370,952


Street Address City19th Street



StateSan Angelo Texas

16


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 4,800,000

Description:


Total -$

Project Schedule: % Complete0%0%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 4,800,000

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - - Reduce roadway maintenance

Implementation:

Undetermined



- -

4,800,000

4,800,000$

Design:

- 4,800,000$

Full depth reconstruction of Bell St. from Concho River to Old Ballinger Hwy, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.


- - 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

-

Total

Reconstruction of Bell St from Concho River to Old Ballinger HwyEngineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- -

Projected



Notes:


1) Texas

Completing Project $4,710,500Present Value of Future Cash Flows


Street Address City StateBell Street San Angelo

Improve ride quality, provide ADA compliant handicap access, provide pedestrian amenities and reduce future maintenance costs.

17


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Implementation:

Undetermined



- -

1,300,000

1,300,000$

Design:

- 1,300,000$

Full depth reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.


- - 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

-

Total

Reconstruction of Glenna Dr. from Houston Harte to Junius St.Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

1,300,000 -

Projected



Notes:


1) Texas



Street Address City StateGlenna Drive San Angelo


18


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Implementation:

Undetermined



- -

1,800,000

1,800,000$

Design:

- 1,800,000$

Full depth reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.


- - 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

-

Total

Reconstruction of Main St. from 19th St. to 26th St.Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- 1,800,000

Projected



Notes:


1) Texas



Street Address City StateMain Street San Angelo


19


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Implementation:

Undetermined



- - -

-$

Design:

- 2,500,000$

Full depth reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St., installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.


- 2,500,000 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

-

Total

Reconstruction of MLK Blvd. from 25th St. to 29th St.Engineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- -

Projected



Notes:


1) Texas



Street Address City StateMartin Luther King Blvd. San Angelo


20


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Implementation:

Undetermined



- -

6,500,000

6,500,000$

Design:

- 6,500,000$

Full depth reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset south to railroad tracks, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.


6,500,000 - 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

-

Total

Reconstruction of Southwest Blvd from Sunset South to Railroad TracksEngineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- -

Projected



Notes:


1) Texas



Street Address City StateSouthwest Blvd San Angelo


21


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Implementation:

Undetermined



- -

2,500,000

2,500,000$

Design:

- 2,500,000$

Full depth reconstruction of29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to 2018 N. Chadbourne, installation of sidewalks and ADA compliant curb ramps.


- - 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future

-

Total

Reconstruction of 29th St. from Bryant Blvd. to N. ChadbourneEngineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

- 2,500,000

Projected



Notes:


1) Texas



Street Address City State29th Street San Angelo


N/A

22


Responsible Dept:


663,000 1,800,000

Description:


Total -$


Funding Sources: Amount $ 1,800,000 $ -


Projected

Sealcoat is the application of asphalt and aggregate over existing asphalt roadway surfaces for the purpose of sealing surface cracks for the protection of the roadway foundation. The foundation of a roadway accounts for approximately 67% of the total cost of a roadway. Sealcoat is part of the City's preventative maintenance program and must be done to realize the full useful life of existing asphalt roadways throughout the City. Sealcoat should be applied to asphalt roadways at intervals not to exceed 8 years.

17/1814/15600,000 600,000

Sealcoat ProgramEngineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

15/164,863,000$

16/17 Future Total

-

- -

1,800,000


600,000 600,000

Undetermined

Implementation: September 2013

General Fund

cracks and potholes created by severe crackingReduce routine maintenance costs associated with reparing



1,800,000$

Design: February 2013



Notes:


1)

cracks and potholes created by severe cracking

Increase routine maintenance costs associated with

Improve ride quality, reduce future maintenance costs and extend the need for expensive long term reconstruction costs.

repairing cracks and potholes created by severe cracking


City Wide San Angelo Texas

Completing Project $4,676,871 Not Completing Project Undetermined

Street Address City State

23


Responsible Dept:


-$ 700,000 1,000,000

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18

30,000,000$

Design:Implementation: 2013

Future stormwater utility fee

Construction of projects to address specific stormwater quality issues within major drainage-ways throughout San Angelo that have been identified through the analysis and modeling of data collected by stormwater monitoring stations.

Supporting planning document(s):City of San Angelo Stormwater Management Plan and associated City Council approved stormwater budget.

Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok.

- -

30,000,000 -

1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 23,300,000 29,300,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Storm Water Quality Improvement ProjectsEngineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/1850,000$ 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact -$ - - - -


Notes:


1)Street Address City State

City wide San Angelo Texas

Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $26,524,213 Not Completing Project Undetermined

A reduction in the measured levels of pollution within drainage ways and rivers throughout and downstream of San Angelo.

Operations and Maintenance

24


Responsible Dept:


-$ -

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - 10 000Cost associated with routine maintenance which includes

700,000$

Design: 2013Implementation: 2014

Stormwater Utility Fee

Sunset Lake acts as a stormwater retention/detention pond. Sampling and analysis through the City's stormwater quality monitoring program has resulted in the determination that stormwater discharges into Sunset Lake contain a significant amount of suspended solids (sediment) and dissolved solids (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus from fertilizer). Sunset Lake is no longer efficient in removing these contaminants because sediment deposits have caused it to become "silted in". Shallow water depth and nutrient rich water and sediment result in the lake becoming covered with moss and other aquatic vegetation during the summer months. This vegetation uses all of the available oxygen in the water which has resulted in several fish kills over the last several years and a continuous odor problem. The average depth of Sunset Lake is approximately four (4) feet. This project would increase the depth of the lake to its original depth of approximately 8 feet and add components making more efficient at removing contaminants from stormwater.

Supporting planning document(s):City of San Angelo Stormwater Management Plan and associated City Council approved stormwater budget.

Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from

File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok.

- -

700,000 -

700,000 - 700,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Storm Water Quality Improvement Projects - Sunset Lake ImprovementsEngineering Services Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

Projected

$ 10,000

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Cost associated with removing vegetation debris from Sunset 5,000$ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000


Notes:


1)2) and Brook Hollow Ln.

Street Address City StateBetween Loop 306 and Sunset Dr./Huntington San Angelo Texas

Design is being done in-house, therefore there is no separate cost estimate.

Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $683,241 Not Completing Project $28,635

Lake.

A reduction in the measured levels of pollution within drainage ways and rivers throughout and downstream of San Angelo.

Cost associated with routine maintenance which includesdraining Sunset Lake and removing sediment and debrisevery five years.

25


Responsible Division:


-$ 700,000 1,300,000

Description:


Total -$


0%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 2,000,000 $ -


Undetermined

2,000,000$

Design:Implementation:

General Fund

During storm events, an excessive amount of street flow occurs across Bryant Blvd. flowing down Ave. P. The existing culverts under Bryant discharge directly onto Ave. P, and after crossing Bryant, the flow continues to the east along Ave P, cuts through an alley between Ave P and Q, the continues south in a channel between Irving St. and Chadbourne St. until in reaches the Red Arroyo. Remediation of this drainage problem consists of the construction of drainage improvements including street re-grading, culvert modification and subsurface drainage system installation.


Insert a picture of your proposed project here.Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object…

Click on the tab Create from File,then click Browse…

Browse to your picture,then click Insert and Ok.

50,000 -

1,950,000 -

- - - - 2,000,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Remediation of Drainage Issue: West Ave. P at Bryant Blvd.Stormwater Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

Projected



Performance Measure:

Notes:


1)


Street Address City StateW. Ave. P at Bryant San Angelo Texas

Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $1,975,761

No impact

Reduce flood hazards to protect property and the health, safety and welfare of the public.

No impact

26


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 75,000

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/181,000$ 1,500 2,500 - - Longer lasting hot water heaters and other appliances.

Less expenses for chemicals and cleaning materials noted

125,000$

Design: 1 monthImplementation 1 month

Water Fund

The water lines behind Officers' Row are ancient, possibly dating to the late 1800s! The water has poor pressure and a foul smell and objectionable appearance. It poses long-term challenges to appliances and plumbing fixtures. Staff recommends a full replacement of the lines. These lines serve several critical buildings that serve our VIP guests (OQ 1), our visitors (OQ 3 and OQ 4), our renters and events (OQ 8) and staff (OQ 2, OQ 7 & O Q 9).





- -

125,000 -

25,000 25,000 - - - 125,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Avenue D Water Line ReplacementWater Utilities Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/181,500$ 2,000 2,500 - -


Notes:


1)

Not Completing Project $5761

Street Address City State100 & 200 Block/ East Ave. D San Angelo Texas

The fort board and staff have consistently ranked the water service and quality on this side of the fort as a major concern. The improved water service is vital to the fort's success in ongoing programing and public service. It will also contribute to the better functioning of these structures.

Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $126,094

Potential expenses for interior appliances and fixtures; loss of income from rental buildings due to poor publicperception of site

Increased Rentals; Fewer Complaints; Fewer Appliance/Fixture Replacements

Less expenses for chemicals and cleaning materials, notedby these figures.

27

City of San Angelo, Texas 2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan

Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/143,750,000$ 1,300,000 1,250,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design - Construction 4,332,815 Other -

Total 4,332,815$

Project Schedule: % Complete

65%



7,500,000$


Water CIP Fund

There are approximately 33,000 water meters in the City's water system. The existing meters will be replaced or upgraded with electronic meter registering equipment. Meter readings will be transmitted automatically through a wireless network to the utility billing office. The system will eliminate the need to manually read meters. Customer service will be improved by having timely and accurate meter information and leak detection monitoring which can notify a customer automatically of unusual water usage. Existing meter readers will be reassigned to system maintenance in the distribution system.





- -

7,500,000 -

1,250,000 - - - - 7,550,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Automated Meter Reading System (AMR)Water Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18(44,000)$ (45,000) (46,000) (46,000) (46,000)

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact -$


Notes:




A total of 21,288 meters have been converted to AMR. 5,600 AMR units or in stock to be installed.


Meter readings will be obtained each month on a fixed date allowing for improved billing of the account.

Rreduction of two meter reader positions

28


Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/142,000,000$ 997,896 1,000,000

Description:


Total 2,000,000$


3%



74,000,000$

Design: In-houseImplementation: ongoing

Water CIP Fund

Clay sewer mains were the industry standard prior to the 1980's. It is a strong but brittle pipe which does not perform well with soil movement. Highly susceptible to root intrusion, inflow, cracking and clogging. Traditional joints are not considered water or root proof. These mains are aging rapidly and often fail causing overflows. These overflows are monitored by the TCEQ and EPA and environmental fines can be assessed. The program is a continual capital replacement program in which aged and failing mains will be replaced on a condition and age priority.


- -

74,000,000 -

1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 66,000,000 73,997,896$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Clay Pipe ReplacementsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact -$ - - - -

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/1820,000$ 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000


Notes:




Identification and selection of projects underway. First project was bid in 2010.

Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $64,673,971 Not Completing Project $108,455

Increased cost for repairs to mains and manholes

Approximately 15,000 ft. of pipe will be replaced each year.

29


Responsible Dept:


12,700,000$ 7,000,000 1,000,000

Description:


Total 12,700,000$


54%



23,700,000$

Design: In-houseImplementation: 2011

Wastewater CIP Fund

Replacement of aging and failing sewer collector mains. Sewer collector mains are generally larger than 12 inches in diameter and serve large areas of the population. Many of these large aged lines are concrete. Concrete mains are highly susceptible to corrosive gases and the pipes degrade to failure. Failure of these lines cause large service area disruptions and environmental fines can be substantial. This is a long term continual project. As the aged mains are replaced, newer mains are aging to the point of potential failure. In addition, growth of the City places ever increasing loads on these lines making the continued reliable service even more critical. As the City grows many of these mains will need to be replaced with larger mains or additional mains to handle service loads.

Supporting planning document(s):Wastewater collection system master plan

- -

23,700,000 -

1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - 23,700,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Collector Main ReplacementsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected




Notes:


1)2) 30' MAIN-1002 Rio Concho Dr.

Street Address City State42" main-1800 Christoval Rd. San Angelo Texas

42" on Christoval Rd complete December 2008. 36" along Rio Concho Dr. were designed and bid in 2010.


Increased repairs of old mains

About 10,000 ft of 42" main were installed under the 2007 contract and about 7,300 ft of 30" main was replaced in the 2010 contract.

30




18,000,000$ 35,000,000 37,000,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design 17,000,000 Construction 1,000,000 Other -

Total 18,000,000$


0%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 94,500,000 $ 25,500,000


Type B sales tax

120,000,000$

Design: 2011Implementation:2013

Water Fund

Development of the Hickory Water Supply will provide the city with an underground water supply. The project will be developed in three phases. Phase I will begin in 2011 and be operational by 2014. It will consist of installation of pumps in 9 existing wells, construction of well field collector pipelines, construction of a booster pump station at the well field, construction of about 60 miles of 30 inch transmission main from the well field to the city and construction of a treatment facility.





- 17,000,000

103,000,000 -

30,000,000 - - - - 120,000,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Hickory Water Supply Development Phase IWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected




Notes:


1)


Street Address City StateMelvin Texas

Well field collector pipeline on existing wells is complete. 30 inch transmission main is 60% complete. Booster Pump Station is on schedule.


Undetermined

Phase I of the project will provide the city with 6 million gallons per day, about 6,700 acre-feet per year of water.

Undetermined

31


Responsible Dept:


-$ 3,950,000 -

Description:


Total 2,961,233$


75%



3,950,000$

Design: Implementation: 2012-2013

Water CIP Fund

The High Service Pump Station consists of 6 pumps which pump water from the Water Treatment Plant into the distribution system and tanks throughout the City. This station is critical to the continual delivery of water to the citizens and customers of the City of San Angelo. Pumps 1 & 2 are in a 1940's era station and the pumps have been in service since that time. Pumps 3 thru 6 were installed in the 1960's and have been replaced with new pumps over the last 5 years. Pumps 1 and 2 need to be completely replaced and the electrical equipment on pumps 3 thru 6 needs to be replaced.



- -

3,950,000 -

- - - - - 3,950,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

High Service Pump Station RehabilitationWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No impact -$



Notes:



327 E. Ave I San Angelo Texas


Increased repairs to pumps and motor

High Service Pump Station #1 is substantially complete. Replace electrical equipment on remaining pumps still remains to be completed.

32


Responsible Dept:


320,000$ 200,000 200,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design - Construction 320,000 Other -

Total 320,000$


20%



1,720,000$


Wastewater CIP Fund

The City of San Angelo has 48 lift stations and 151 grinder stations that it operates and maintains. Each year several stations are added based on City growth. These pump stations are mostly mechanical and electrical in nature and operate in highly corrosive environments. The expected operating life of pumps is 5 years and that is with consistent maintenance. This program is intended to continually replace pumps and electrical components for continued reliable service. Failure of these systems affects regional areas of population and can result in sewer overflows and possible flooding of customer facilities. The program will also include the addition of telemetry equipment at the lift stations to provide for 24 hour per day remote monitoring of the lift stations for and alarms or problems.

Supporting planning document(s):Wastewater collection system master plan

- -

1,720,000 -

200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,720,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Lift Station ImprovementsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected




Notes:




Continual capital replacement program for lift station pumps and electrical systems through out the year.


Increased cost for maintenance of lift stations

Rehabilitation work will be done on about 3 stations each year.

33


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Nasworthy Dam Emergency SpillwayWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total2,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000$

A portion of the earthen embankment section along the southern portion of Nasworthy Dam is designed to serve as an emergency spillway for the dam. The emergency spillway consists of two lowered sections of the dam's embankment which would be overtopped when discharges occur. The earthen spillways however do not have any protection from erosion of a discharge, the result which would be a wash out and failure of the dam section. The spillways need to be modified to withstand overtopping flows with reinforced concrete paving and a 500 ft. diversion dike and channel downstream of the dam to protect the downstream toe of the dam.



- -

2,000,000 -

2,000,000$

Design: Implementation: 2013

Water CIP Fund




Notes:


1)

No impact

No impact

Modification of the emergency spillways will bring the facility into compliance with TCEQ dam design standards.


Street Address City State1900 Beaty Rd. San Angelo Texas

34


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Nasworthy Dam Stop Log SystemWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

- 750,000 - - - 750,000$

Stop logs are a gate system that is used to isolate a radial gate on the dam for servicing or to stop water discharge through the gate bay in the event of a failure of a radial gate. The dam currently has a full length slide gate which is installed in the gate bay to isolate a gate. The slide gate must be moved by a large crane from the downstream side of the dam and can only be installed when the radial gate is closed. With this system, there is no way to install a stop gate when water is flowing through a radial gate bay. A new stop log system is needed whereby the stop logs can be installed from the bridge deck with flow going through the gate bay.



- -

750,000 -

750,000$

Design: Implementation: 2013

Water CIP Fund




Notes:


1)

No impact

No impact

The stop log system will allow a gate on the dam to be isolated in an emergency situation

Present Value of Future Cash Flows Completing Project $708,824 Not Completing Project Undetermined


35


Responsible Dept:


-$ 1,034,000 2,216,000

Description:


Total -$




Lake Nasworthy Gate OperatorsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson


- - - - - 3,250,000$

Nasworthy Dam has 15 radial gates that are used to release flood waters through the dam. The gates are operated by two mobile operators that are mounted on carts which are pulled between gates. The operators are original equipment from when the dam was constructed in 1929. The average time to set up, open a gate and move to the next gate is 25 minutes. Based on the gate operating time needed to pass the probable maximum local flood for the reservoir, the current operating speed is not adequate to keep floodwaters from overtopping the gates. The proposed project will install a permanent operating winch on each gate. This will allow multiple gates to be operated within the time needed to pass the design flood. The improvements will bring the gate operations into compliance with TCEQ dam regulations.



- -

3,250,000 -

3,250,000$


Water CIP Fund




Notes:


1)

No impact

No impact

Replacement of the gate operators will bring the facility into compliance with TCEQ regulations.



36


Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/141,650,000$ 500,000 500,000

Description:


Total 1,650,000$


45%



3,650,000$


Water CIP Fund

This project is the replacement of aged and failing transmission valves. Transmission lines are larger than 16" and serve large areas of the population. Valves on these lines are rarely used and have not been routinely exercised. Older valves utilized steel discs and seats and are highly susceptible to corrosion. Deposits in the seats and on the discs prevent the valves from seating and degradation of the steel slides and gates cause valves to seize or bind and break. Continual maintenance and replacement of valves over the long term is required to maintain a consistent and reliable system.



- -

3,650,000 -

500,000 500,000 - - - 3,650,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Transmission Line Valves ReplacementWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected


Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/1815,000$ 20,000 20,000 - -


Notes:



Various sites in SMD 1,2,3,4,5,6 San Angelo Texas

22 valves were replaced in the 2008 contract.


Additional time and resources to isolate pipe segments for repair of leaks and water shut off to large areas of the city

Valves are to be replaced annually.

37


Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/145,640,000$ - 5,100,000

Description:


Total 5,640,000$


20%



28,190,000$


Water CIP Fund

Replacement and upgrade of transmission mains. These mains are larger than 16" in size and serve large areas of the populations. Reliable and continued service is required to move water from the plant to the tanks and pump stations throughout the City. Projects are planned as follows: 2006: Phase I-Southwest Feeder Transmission Main, $4,500,000; 2008: Ave I Main from Metcalfe to Chadbourne $1,140,000; 2010: Ave. I Transmission Main Replacement from Chadbourne to Bryant Blvd, $1,600,0002012: 20" Ave. K Transmission Main, $3,500,000Future Projects: 2014: Phase II-Southwest Feeder Transmission Main, $5,300,000; 2016: North Transmission Main Improvements, $6,000,000.Upper plane transmission mains which serve the highest growth areas will likely begin requiring upgrades by the 2017 timeframe, $6,150,000.

Supporting planning document(s):Water System Master Plan


- -

28,190,000 -

5,300,000 6,000,000 6,150,000 - - 28,190,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Transmission MainsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected




Notes:



100 Ave I San Angelo Texas

2006 Southwest Feeder Main complete and placed in service January 15, 2008. Ave I main replacement work complete in 2009.Project % Completion: Southwest Feeder Phase I (100%); Ave I (0%); Ave K (0%); Southwest Feeder Phase II (0%); North (0%); Upper Plane (0%)


Increased repairs to existing mains and more interruptionof service to large areas of the city due to the leaks.

Approximately 5,600 ft of 20" water main are planned to be replaced.

38


Responsible Dept:


900,000$ 100,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design - Construction 700,000 Other 200,000

Total 900,000$


90%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 225,000 $ 375,000 $ 400,000


Twin Buttes Eco-System RestorationWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson


- - - - - 1,000,000$

The project will provide for the removal of invasive brush in the lake basin. The project consists of the removal of 3,900 acres of salt cedar & willow baccharis and 5,600 acres of mesquite.



File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and Ok.

- -

800,000 200,000

1,000,000$


Water CIP FundWater OperatingState Soil and Water Board



Notes:


1)

Approximately 9,500 acres will be cleared of invasive brush in the reservoir basin.

Initial work began in 2010 with be spraying of salt cedar in the upper reaches of the reservoir. Each year additional areas will be sprayed proceeding down through the basin to the dam.


Street Address City State6 miles Southwest of San Angelo San Angelo Texas

39




-$ 500,000 500,000

Description:


Total -$




Water Billing and Customer Service Office RemodelingWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson


- - - - - 1,000,000$

Remodel the existing building to provide for a modern work environment by replacing electrical wiring, restrooms, new work areas for customer service representatives and billing personnel, exterior repairs and painting, handicapped accessibly entrance, increased security for cash collections.





- 100,000 900,000

-

1,000,000$

Design: 2013Implementation: end-2014

Water CIP Fund




Notes:


1)

Undetermined

Undetermined

20 employees currently occupy the building. This will create a better working environment for these employees that assist in approximately 50,000 call-ins a year. Remodeling the building will also impact the 30,000 walk-in customers that access the building annually.

The facility will be evaluated for remodeling or replacement. Construction planned for the end of 2014.


Street Address City State122 W. 1st St. San Angelo Texas

40


Responsible Dept:


15,731,509$ 1,300,000 1,300,000

Description:


Total 15,731,509$


30%



52,761,509$

Design: In-HouseImplementation: 2001/ongoing

Water CIP Fund

This is an ongoing water mains replacement program initiated in 2001 with priority replacement of 2" mains throughout the City. The 2" main replacement program is continuing with primary emphasis until the 2011-2012 time frame. Gradually the emphasis will be moving to rusty water mains and aged cast iron mains. Since 2001: 334,000 feet of 2" mains replaced. 90,000 feet of 2" mains remaining. Cast iron and rusty mains: 470,000 feet of mains to replace at projected cost of $30,930,000. This is a continuous capital requirement for rehabilitation and replacement of aging distribution systems. As systems are replaced, other sections are aging to the point of need for replacement.



- -

52,761,509 -

1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 29,230,000 52,761,509$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Water Main ReplacementsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected




Notes:



Various locations in SMD 1,2,3,4,5,6 San Angelo Texas

This is an ongoing capital maintenance program.


Increased cost for repairs to mains and additional flushing of mains to maintain water quality.

Approximately 15,000 ft of mains will be replace each year.

41


Responsible Dept:


400,000$ 200,000 200,000

Description:


Total 400,000$


22%



1,800,000$


Wastewater CIP Fund

The Water Reclamation Facility treats all of the wastewater from the City of San Angelo and delivers to irrigation. The operating environment for wastewater treatment is harsh on all systems including mechanical, electrical and concrete. There are hundreds of mechanical systems in the plant including pumps, clarifiers, air scrubbers, sludge belts, blowers, heat exchangers and more. Most of these systems need some type of major repair or replacement every 5 years. Concrete walls of basins and equipment are subject to corrosive properties present at wastewater plants and need repair and rehabilitation every 5 to 6 years. This program schedules funding to facilitate repair, rehabilitation or replacement on a condition and critical priority basis.


- -

1,800,000 -

200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,800,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Water Reclamation Plant ImprovementsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected




Notes:



1898 City Farm Rd. San Angelo Texas


Increased costs to repair in the future due to continual deterioration of facilities

Repairs to various structures and mechanical equipment with a life expectancy of 10 years.

42


Responsible Dept:


500,000$ 300,000 200,000

Description:


Total 500,000$


23%



2,200,000$

Design: 2010Implementation: ongoing

Water CIP Fund

Rehabilitation and replacement of aging water treatment plant equipment based on condition, age and criticality. Equipment includes items such as flocculator mechanisms, clarifier mechanisms, filters, plant valves and other plant operation mechanisms.



- -

2,200,000 -

400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2,200,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

WTP Equipment ImprovementsWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected




Notes:



327 E Ave I San Angelo Texas

Projects include work on control valves and electrical service in the filter building.


Increased maintenance of equipment and eventual shut downof equipment when it can no longer be repaired

Control valves, clarifier equipment and electrical equipment will be replaced with a life expectancy of about 20 years.

43


Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/143,000,000$ 1,200,000 -

Description:


Total 3,000,000$


18%



17,000,000$

Design: In-houseImplementation: 2010

Wastewater CIP Fund

Some areas of the City do not have wastewater service. To establish service to the areas may require construction of new collector mains, service mains and lift stations. The estimated cost to provide service to the following areas is as listed below.


- -

17,000,000 -

- - - - 13,000,000 17,200,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Wastewater Service to Existing Developed AreasWater Utilities Project Manager: Ricky Dickson

Projected

$15.0 MillionTotal

$2.0 MillionLos Lomas7

$2.0MillionButler Farm6

$3.5 MillionCountry Club Road5

$2.0 MillionCountry Club Lake Estates4

$2.0 MillionRed Bluff3

$500,000Mercedes & Townview2

$3.0 MillionGreen Acres 1

Estimated CostAreaNo.

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Increased revenue from new wastewater customers -$ - - - -

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Lost revenue from residents not on City wastewater -$ - - - -


Notes:



Various locations in SMD 1,2,6 San Angelo Texas


Provide municipal wastewater service to residents that currently have on site wastewater disposal systems.

Extension of wastewater service to the Red Bluff area to complete the sewer collection system at Lake Nasworthy planned to begin in 2013

44


Responsible Dept:


68,000$ 18,000 18,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design - Construction - Other 68,000

Total 68,000$


60%



158,000$


Tom Green County Fee

Replace crosswalk signs with the bright yellow green high reflectivity signs. Replace or update time clocks with new clocks that also can be sent time and date information via radio or pager signal. Replace painted crosswalks with thermo plastic heat tape. Replacement of crosswalk signs and crosswalks will provide improved visibility for pedestrian safety.





- - -

158,000

18,000 18,000 18,000 - 158,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Replace School Zone and Crosswalk EquipmentTraffic Operations Project Manager: Shane Kelton

Projected


- - - - 32,500



Notes:


1)

Not Completing Project $99,269

Street Address City StateCity Wide San Angelo Texas

Funding Source - Crosswalk Guard and Equipment Revenues collected by Tom Green County Fee. Radios and time clocks will be upgraded as funds are available from the county. The thermoplastic crosswalk material will reduce the maintenance of crosswalks to once every five years from repainting crosswalks every two months.

Traffic Operations Divisions currently maintains 150 crosswalks. The cost to replace with thermoplastic every 5 years will cost approximately $32,500.00.


Continued cost of repainting crosswalks.

150 Signs have been replaced at all school crossings and all crosswalks have been marked with thermo plastic material.

Annual electrical savings of $4,500.00 per year.Replace Thermoplastic

45




94,000$ 48,000 56,550

Description:


Total 94,000$


30%


Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18122,550 126,081 129,730 133,502 137,402Increase in operation budget to meet and maintain federal

577,364$

Design:Implementation: ongoing

General Fund

Upgrade informational, warning and regulatory signs to meet newly established federal required mandates for reflectivity. The Traffic Division has inventoried and tested the retroreflectivity of all the City signs. They currently have maintenance responsibily for approximately 12,000 informational, warning and regulatory signs. Tests revealed 30% have failed and are in need of replacement. The Federal Highway Administration has extended the deadline for the replacement of failed signs from 2018 to 2020. In order to stay in compliance with the mandate the Traffic Division will have to replace approximately 870 signs a year. This number includes the 3,600 that are currently out of compliance and the extimated 5% that will fail each of the following years. The replacement of signs to stay in compliance will be an ongoing responsibility well past the compliance deadline.





- - -

577,364

57,681 58,834 60,011 61,211 141,077 577,364$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Sign Reflectivity UpgradeTraffic Operations Project Manager: Shane Kelton

Projected

122,550 126,081 129,730 133,502 137,402



Notes:




COMPLIANCE DATES: January 2012-Implement a sign maintenance program that addresses the minimum sign retroreflectivity requirements.January 2017-Complaince with the new retroreflectivity requirements for most of their traffic signs they have installed, including all red and white or white and black "regulatory" signs, yellow and black "warning" signs and ground-mounted green and white "guide" signs (except street name signs).

January 2020-Compliance with the new retroreflectivity requirements for all signs. The Traffic Operations Division has inventoried all signs for a total of 12,000. Of the 12,000 30% have failed the retroreflectivity tests for minimum requirements. Of the remaining 8,400 signs we are estimating that approximately 5% of those will fail the retroreflectometer test on a yearly basis until all signs have been replaced after 8 years.Mandated by Federal Highway Administration - If not completed the City may be found at fault for Gross Negligence Liability. In order to accomplish this project and remain in compliance the Traffic Division has hired an additional two full time employees and will purchase a vehicle.


Potential Gross Negligence Liablity

In order to maintain and stay in compliance with the federal mandates the Traffic Division will be required to replace approximately 870 signs per year.

Increase in operation budget to meet and maintain federalmandate. This includes the cost of two additional full time employees and O&M of an additional vehicle.

46

OOtthheerr PPrroojjeeccttss LEVEL 2

Airport

City Operations Facilities

Community Facilities and parks

City Facilities

Environmental

Equipment

Technology

CCaappiittaall

IImmpprroovveemmeenntt

PPllaann

22001133--22001188


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/LandDesignConstructionOther

Total -$


Funding Sources: Amount $ 549,410 $ 61,045

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/185,000$ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Pavement maintenance

FAA GrantPFC Fund

- 54,900

555,555 -

610,455$



- 54,900 555,555 - 16/17

Design, engineering, and construction for the sealcoat and pavement rehabilitation of the terminal building apron and Runway 9-27 and 18-36. Over time joint seals deteriorate causing water to penetrate the sub-surface and damage the pavement. Joint seals need to be replaced in order to extend the life of the pavement.

Future Total- 610,455$

17/1814/15 15/16

Apron Joint SealAirport Project Manager: Luis Elguezabal

Projected



Notes:

Location of Project (provide at least one of the following locators for each location):Address:

1)


Street Address City State8618 Terminal Circle San Angelo Texas

Completing Project $589,909 Not Completing Project $135,484

The area that will need the Apron Joint Seal is approximately 359,000 SQ FT.

Increased pavement maintenance

48


Responsible Dept:


-$ 631,889 -

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/181,000$ 3,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 Decreased maintenance costs

FAA GrantPFC Fund


File, then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and

- 55,556

576,333 -

631,889$



- 16/17

Design, engineering, and construction for high intensity runway lights for Runway 3-21 and also improvements to the rotating beacon and electrical vault. This lighting system is 11 years old and has failed. The FAA has allocated funds for the replacement and repair of this system this fiscal year.


17/1814/15 15/16

Runway 3-21 Runway Lights and Airport Beacon ReplacementAirport Project Manager: Luis Elguezabal

Projected



Notes:


1)


Street Address City State8618 Terminal Circle, Suite-101 San Angelo Texas


Total of 70 lights in the system. Annual replacement of 12% of lights per year is expected until the system is re-constructed.

The system has failed. FAA has allocated funds for the replacement of the circuit this year.

Future failure and unreliable system

49


Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/141,239,379$ 1,110,000 1,110,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design 354,526 Construction 884,853 Other

Total 1,239,379$

Project Schedule: % Complete100%20%0%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 5,491,230 $ 289,011 $ 500,000

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - - More efficiency, less maintenance, improved aesthetics.

Completion: 11-2013

FAA GrantPFC FundsType B Sales Tax

- 354,526

5,925,715

6,280,241$

Design: 12-2010Implementation: Start Date 01-2012


1,110,000 1,110,000 600,862 - 16/17

The San Angelo Regional Airport is currently modernizing the existing terminal building. The project consists of remodeling of the landside functions to relate to the new concourse, improve the passenger experience, and provide an aesthetic enhancement with a regional identity.Specifically, construction consists of exterior and driveway improvements such as: new entry monument sign, terminal entrance pavement enhancements, curbside canopies, and air traffic control tower renovations.Improvements to the interior includes items such as: new entrance and exit vestibules, relocation and configuration of the airline ticket counters and baggage claim belt, improvements to the security check point to assist with the screening process, structural modifications to accommodate a view from the entrance to the arrival/departure escalator area, relocation of the airport administrative offices, adjustments to the HVAC, security, fire protection, and IT systems, and enhancements to the meet and greet area.

Future Total- 6,280,241$

17/1814/15 15/16

Airport Terminal RenovationAirport Project Manager: Luis Elguezabal

Projected



Notes:


1)


Street Address City State8618 Terminal Circle San Angelo Texas

Completing Project $4,874,613 Not Completing Project Undetermined

Project is scheduled to be completed in 540 days. Contractor has used 343 days or about 64% of the time is used.

Note that although 64% of the time allotted for completion has elapsed, only 20% of the project has been completed. Construction is about 6 months behind.

No impact

50


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 500,000

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18(5,000)$ (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) Savings on Maintenance and Repairs


Undetermined

The current HVAC system at the EOC is the original installed when the building was constructed 26 years ago. Replacement parts are scarce to non-existent. Only TWO repair men at Duncan Mechanical Services are capable of making repairs at this time. The pneumatic control system is inefficient and unreliable, constantly cooling or heating, which in turn cost unnecessary utility expenses. We recommend the purchase of a new more energy efficient system. Total HVAC replacement will reduce the ongoing electrical costs and maintenance repairs.

Supporting planning document(s):Ron Lewis, COSA Construction and Facilities Maintenance, and WTA Engineering provided the necessary preliminary cost analysis. The estimate of $327,000 in 2008 has been adjusted by a minimum of 10% for each year since 2008 to cover inflation costs.

- 75,000

425,000 -

500,000$

- - - - - 500,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

EOC HVAC ReplacementEmergency Management Project Manager: Teresa Covey

Projected



Notes:



8485 Hangar Rd. San Angelo Texas

If the HVAC system is not replaced, maintenance costs will continue to increase as the amount of leaks in the hot water lines throughout the building continue to increase. Options for repairs are limited due to lack of the antiquated pneumatic system. Budget Impact if NOT completed reflects an annual 10% increase in cost. If a repair needs to be made, we will take this request forward for approval, on an as needed basis.

If the HVAC system is not replaced and repairs are needed at a time when the EOC is activated, this will create a hardship on key personnel at a time of critical decision making. The City of San Angelo Emergency Management Department is bound by contract with the FAA to maintain the facility at 8485 Hangar Road.


Repairs and Maintenance

51


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land 3,684 Design - Construction - Other

Total 3,684$


0%



Fire Station #4 ReconstructionFire Project Manager: Brian Dunn


Relocate Fire Station #4 and reconstruct. Station 4 was constructed in 1965 and has never been improved. A fire truck cannot be purchased that will fit in the engine bay of Station 4. Additionally, the station will be made gender compliant. The city has been in discussions with GAFB about building the station on the corner of Bell Street and Paint Rock Road. There are several items the city will have to address if this location is approved. We will have to re-fence the area, move some water boxes, and move a gas main. We will also be responsible for some paving. We are looking for alternate locations at this time in case this site falls through.





80,000 65,000

2,435,000 -

2,580,000$


General Fund C.O.

No impact -$ - - - -



Notes:


1)

Improved response time, lower the ISO rating

Improved response times and geographically locating fire stations has an impact on the city's ISO rating. The ISO rating is the rating system in which insurance companies base their insurance premiums to commercial and residential customers. The City of San Angelo will be graded in the summer of 2008. The city should get an improved rating which will in turn reduce premiums for the citizens and businesses in the City of San Angelo.


Street Address City State702 E. Ave. L San Angelo Texas

52


Responsible Dept:


-$ 1,200,000 1,400,000

Description:


Total -$




Fire Training Facility Fire Project Manager: Brian Dunn


- - - - - 2,600,000$

A new fire training facility located behind the animal shelter on U.S. 67 North. This facility will have a classroom and office building and a fire burn building. This facility will replace the current training center on Avenue L that is approaching 50 years of age. The current training center is located on the Concho river across from the city water intake. TCEQ has basically shut down many of our fire training operations because of the proximity of the river.




- -

2,600,000 -

2,600,000$

Design: Implementation:

Federal EDA GrantGeneral Fund Bond

-$ - - - -



Notes:


1)

At this point there isn't any impact to the operating budget

The ability to train current personnel and future personnel


Street Address City StateBehind 3142 u.s. 67 north San Angelo Texas

53


Responsible Dept:


-$ 200,000

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18$

Chase State Office Building ImprovementsFort Concho/State Building Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt


20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 300,000$

The sprinkler risers in the Chase State Office Building are almost 60 years old and should be replaced. Also, approximately 600 feet of the system piping has had numerous small leaks in the past five years, thus endangering whole sections of office and public space. This project will replace them over a three year period.Office and hallway carpets need to be replaced throughout the Chase State Office Building and Concho Valley Workforce Building in the coming years, due to wear and tear, safety and fulfillment of exisiting leases. A multi-year plan will accommodate these needs within available funding.HVAC units at the State Buidlings range from 10 to 12 years old and will start to fail in the coming years. To maintain proper climate control with increasingly efficient equipment, a multi-year replacement plan is necessary.




- -

300,000 -

300,000$

Design: Implementation: 2017/2018

Fund 201 State Office Building

C l ti th j t ill d i t t d (2,500)$ (5,000) (10,000) (12,500) (15,000)

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/181,000$ 3,000 5,000 7,000 9,000 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 10,000


Notes:


1)

Completing the project will reduce maintenance costs andreduce energy consumption.

Repair and spot replacement for carpetHVAC repairs

No leaks or drops in the system pressure over time. Easier cleaning by custodial contractor; no complaints from lessees. Increased energy efficiency and content state staffers.


Street Address City State622 South Oaks San Angelo Texas

54


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 75,000

Description:


Total -$




700 725 750 775 800Cut storage rental feesElectricity

75,000$


Undetermined

The San Angelo Police Department Lake Patrol is in need of a boat storage dock on Lake Nasworthy. Currently the boats are stored offsite. When the Lake Patrol Officer receives a call on Lake Nasworthy, they must first go to the storage facility to retrieve the boat. It takes an average of 20 minutes from the time the call is received to the time the boat is on the water. With a boat dock on Lake Nasworthy the responding officer will be able to go straight to the lake and drop the boat in the water. This will cut 20 minutes off the response time to an emergency on the lake.




- 5,000

70,000 -

- - - - - 75,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Boat Storage DockPolice Department Project Manager: Chief Tim Vasquez

Projected

700 725 750 775 800



Notes:


1) Undetermined San Angelo Texas




None

Decrease response time to emergency calls on Lake Nasworthy by 20 minutes.

Electricity

55


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 60,000

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18900$ 925 950 975 1,000 Cost of electric service to the facility

60,000$


Undetermined

The Police Department has a mobile command center that is used at various events around the city and at critical calls. It is currently housed at the City Shop but is not covered. There is a lot of electronic equipment mounted on top and on the sides of the command center that need to be protected from the weather. Being exposed to the sun also is causing damage to the exterior of the command center. This command center needs to able to be deployed anytime under any circumstances. The storage facility would protect it from dangerous weather and allow it to be ready to be deployed when needed.




- -

60,000 -

- - - - - 60,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Mobile Command Center Storage FacilityPolice Department Project Manager: Chief Tim Vasquez

Projected



Notes:


1) 401 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas




None

56


Responsible Dept:


135,067$ - 25,775,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - DesignConstruction - Other 135,067

Total 135,067$

Project Schedule: % Complete0.5%

0%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 135,067 $ 25,775,000


Police Department Administration BuildingPolice Department Project Manager: Chief Tim Vasquez


The current HQ building was constructed in 1963 and was originally designed to house the Police Dept., Municipal Court, and a City Jail. At the present time, the SAPD is housed in six separate facilities. In 2011 an architect firm completed a feasibility analysis of the current facility and future needs. The analysis cited the following deficiencies: 1. Lack of adequate square footage 2. Lack of code compliance (ADA and Life Safety) 3. Separation of public and staff areas 4. Inadequate building systems (electrical, plumbing, HVAC, etc) 5. Lack of public and staff parking 6. Structural concerns (both at HQ bldg. and auxiliary facilities. The probable steps in the project are: 1. Site selections and acquisition 2. Design 3. Construction. A HQ building of approximately 108,000 sq. ft. and a parking structure are suggested. Site costs are estimated at $775,000 to $2 million. HQ Building cost at $22 to $23 million ($220 to $230 sq.ft.) and parking structure $1.25 to $1.75 million..

Supporting planning document(s):Assessment & Feasibility analysis are available upon request.

500,000

Future General Fund C.O.

25,910,067$

- - -

775,000


25,910,067$

Reductions are expected in the department's operating budget. Building

General Fund




135,067 24,500,000

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18

30,000$ 40,000 50,000 50,000 50,000


Notes:


1)


The original needs assessment and feasibility study was completed mid 2011. This confirmed the SAPD's assertion that new facilities were needed. City council members were invited to tour current facilities and were thoroughly convinced a new facility was in order. The City Manager and Assistant City managers were on board with re-evaluating a new police facilities placement on the CIP list.

maintenance and repairs will decrease as well as some personnel costs. No savings would be expected until construction is competed and will flatten once maximum savings is achieved

Increases in the maintenance and upkeep of the current faclity will occur until a new facility is constructed or major renovations are completed at the current bulding. Systems such as HVAC, Plumbing and Electrical will need updating as will ADA compliance issues. (increase to current budget is listed) -- renovations would increase the estimated costs by 3 to 5 times the amounts listed

While the cost of new construction is high, the cost of acceptable renovations would equal or exceed the cost of constructions, and still not address parking and home land security preferences for public safety facilities. Moving forward with new facilities in a timely fashion will also save money in the long run. Construction costs are estimated to increase 4% annually.

25% reduction in total utility costs (+/- $25,000) ---- 33% reduction in maintenance personnel (+/- $35,000) --- Revenue increases from community room rental ($7,500) ---- Increased revenue from additional training program ($3000) -- the value of increased service/accessibility to the public can't be measured nor can the safety and security afforded by modern faciltiies. Potential for litigations should also be a concern (ADA or injury litigation) but again these things can't be measured.

401 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas



Completing Project $25,121,999

57


Responsible Dept:


-$ 1,435,803

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design 334,500 Construction 1,101,303 Other -

Total 1,435,803$


30%



Auditorium RenovationCivic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena


Renovation of City Auditorium. This project includes shared costs with the City Hall renovation for the HVAC system. The balance of the available funds will address needs that include a fire suppression system, ceiling repairs, restroom renovations, theatrical lighting, rigging and sound systems, and aesthetics. The architect is determining which of those needs can be afforded with the $1.7 million that remains. Future improvements will be coordinated with the San Angelo Performing Arts Coalition, which is raising funds to address those needs. To date, improvements made are the installation of the Central plant (HVAC system) and some minor plumbing issues have been addressed.



- 334,500

3,415,500 -

3,750,000$


Type B Sales Tax

Likely none. The City is expected to execute an agreementwith SAPAC for the operation of the venue once it reopens



Notes:


1)

with SAPAC for the operation of the venue once it reopens. That agreement will include clauses to ensure that City expenses are wholly reimbursed.

None.

SAPAC believes a fully renovated facility will result in continuous use of the venue throughout the calendar year. In years past, the venue has accommodated approximately 65 events per year.

The City and SAPAC have entered into an agreement as of December 2012. SAPAC will be making additional improvements outside of the City-funded portion of this project.


Street Address City State72 W. College Ave. San Angelo Texas

58


Responsible Dept:


-$ 1,000,000

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design 68,511 Construction 499,610 Other -

Total 568,121$




Fairgrounds Livestock BarnCivic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena


- - - - - 1,000,000$

At the request of the San Angelo Stock Show and Rodeo Association, a $1 million initiative to build a new livestock barn to replace the Qualtrust Barn at the San Angelo Fairgrounds was included in the most recent half-cent sales tax initiative. Voters approved that initiative. Demolition of the current facility and construction of the new barn will begin following this year's rodeo and stock show. The facility is expected to be available for use during next year's stock show.



- 75,000

925,000 -

1,000,000$


Type B Sales Tax

The barn will be operated and mainted by SASSRA, so therewill be no impact on the City's budget though the facility



Notes:


1)

will be no impact on the City s budget, though the facility will allow for growth of the stock show, which generates ahuge amount of sales and hotel tax revenue for the City.

Because the barn is operated by the SASSRA, there wouldbe no impact on the City's budget.

Increased number of exhibitors at the annual stock show by approximately 200.

This project is being driven by the SASSRA.


Street Address City State4608 Grape Creek Road San Angelo Texas

59


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 60,000

Description:


Total -$




Coliseum ImprovementsCivic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena


- - - - - 60,000$

There are various improvements that need to be made to the Coliseum in order to properly maintain the facility. These improvements include spotlights, three new urinals, and a forklift. The spotlights that we currently have are at least 25 years old, inadequate, and parts are becoming increasingly hard to find. We need 3 @ $7K a piece ($21,000). Three urinals at the coliseum need to be replaced as they currently leak and are rusted. 3 @ $2K a piece ($6,000). Lastly, we need to replace our existing forklift. Our current forklift is barely operable and requires numerous hours of staff time to keep it running. It is used almost daily and with our upcoming indoor football season, it will be in high demmand. ($33,000)


Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… then find

picture in your files… then double click picture to insert.

- - -

60,000

60,000$


HOT fund balance

Staff time saved in maintenance functions



Notes:


1)

None

Civic Events could potentially recoup $3-$5K by selling our current forklift through an online auction.


Street Address City State50 E. 43rd St. San Angelo Texas

60


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 545,000

Description:


Total -$




Coliseum Roof RehabilitationCivic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena


- - - - - 545,000$

Foster Communications Coliseum has served this community well for 54 years. There's no reason why it shouldn't serve San Angelo another 50 years … but only if it is properly maintained. The venue's roof was recoated in 2001, though that project replaced foam on only 5 percent of the surface area. According to the company that then did that work, other areas of the original roof foam have since deteriorated because of a combination of wind, sun, weather and substrate movement. The roof substrate is close to realizing its expected life. That contractor recommends 100 percent of the roof should be refoamed and recoated at an estimated cost of nearly $500,000. Without the rehabilitation, the community would eventually be looking at spending tens of millions of dollars on a new venue.



- 37,500

507,500 -

545,000$


Potential: Type B Sales Tax, certificates of general bonds, HOT

No money is currently being spent on the roof, so there is no impact on the budget



Notes:


1)

impact on the budget.

None

The Coliseum hosts approximately 40 events per year, drawing more than 80,000 people.

The SASSRA would certainly have a vested interest in seeing this project completed. The original estimate of $500,000 is 3 years old. I am adding a 3% increase per year to keep up with rising costs of material and labor.


Street Address City State50 E. 43rd St. San Angelo Texas

61


Responsible Dept:


-$ 36,831 83,069

Description:


Total -$




Convention Center ImprovementsCivic Events Project Manager: Angelica Pena


- - - - - 119,900$

There are several key improvements that need to be made to the Convention Center in order to properly preserve & maintain the City's most oft used facility . The renovation did not include the replacement of its 1978 marquee, which shows its age. The sign should be replaced with a modern-day digital marquee. ($45,000) Secondly, a security system has never been installed and is greatly needed in order to protect the taxpayer's investment. ($50,000) Next, the Convention Center is in dire need of new tables and chair carts. More tables would eliminate the need to borrow tables from the Stock Show & Rodeo Association or the Fort. ($13,400) Lastly, the foyer/box office area has a large area of wall space that at one time was occupied with several small flat screen TV's. The purchase of a large 90" flat screen would offer opportuniutes for advertising revenue, informational posts, and overall a more attractive appearance. ($11,500)


Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Picture… then find

picture in your files… then double click picture to insert.

- - -

119,900

119,900$


HOT fund balance and Type BType B Sales Tax left over from Convention Center renovation

Staff time savings on maintenance functions



Notes:


1)

None

Result & Efficiency: A new marquee would allow us to spolight more events, give us another tool for disseminating information and could yieldcost-efficiencies as a revenue generator through the selling of advertisements on it

Citywise marketing may be able to help us recover costs by leveraging a sponsor who would have a static presence on the marquee. In addition they may be able to sell advertising on the large flat screen TV.


Street Address City State500 Rio Concho Drive San Angelo Texas

62


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 15,000

Description:


Total -$




Potential: HOT allocation

I d t l ti it ill

15,000$

Design: 2 monthsImplementation: 6 months

Undetermined

Fort and city staff replaced the flagstone floor with a poured concrete pad in the spring of 2011. All material and equipment costs were covered by the Fort Concho Foundation. While the new pad has eliminated safety concerns and has increased usage by staff and renters, we seek funding to complete the project with a period board floor. This would enhance both the appearance and function of this building space.

Supporting planning document(s):2007 Site Review




- 1,000

14,000 -

- - - - - 15,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Fort Concho Barracks 6 New FloorFort Concho Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt

Projected

-$ - - - -



Notes:


1)


Street Address City StateFlipper St. & Burgess St. San Angelo Texas

Use and rental activity increases.

Staff has estimated the project two ways: materials only with staff and inmate labor. The costs obviously increase if bid out as a total package. Staff can perform this project with inmate labor in an efficient and proper manner. The Fort Concho Board and staff ranked this project in the top five in its 2007 site review.


Staff time and materials to spot-repair this floor year-to-year.

More rentals of facility; increased vendor income at site festivals.

Increased rental activity will cover any proportional increase in utilities.

63




-$ - 125,000

Description:


Total -$




General Fund, HOT allocation, grants

O i i l i

160,000$

Design: N/AImplementation: 2016

Undetermined. Potentially:

This CIP project proposes to replace the obsolete and inefficient heating/cooling units at five of the fort's most used structures: Barracks 1 Visitor Center, Officers' Quarters 1, Officers' Quarters 8, Quartermaster and Commissary. Also, we propose to add basic air conditioning to the Bay 3 Stables Hall. Rental activity at all structures, especially the Stables, has increased in recent years but the Stables is not useable without air conditioning from May to September. These structures serve the public with public events and meetings, ongoing displays and programs, and public service. Combined, these six structures consume over 1/3 of the total site power usage. These six structures also serve the majority of site guests. Replacement would drastically decrease repair costs while reducing power consumption.

Supporting planning document(s):Staff are compiling estimates for various replacement options at this time.




- -

160,000 -

20,000 15,000 - - - 160,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Heating and Cooling Unit Replacements at Fort ConchoFort Concho Project Manager: Bob Bluthardt

Projected

5,000$ 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000



Notes:


1)


Street Address City State630 S. Oakes St. San Angelo Texas

Notes: Replacing older and inefficient HVAC units will result in both lower repair costs and power consumption. Adding air conditioning to the Stables will increase usage and rental revenue.


Ongoing repairs and possible replacement and lost revenue

Fewer equipment breakdowns; lower repair costs; fewer visitor & guest complaints; lower power consumption levels for same five buildings.

Ongoing repairs less power savings

64


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 25,000

Description:


Total -$


0%


Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18$Utiliti b d t ff ti t

25,000$

Design: Fall 2012Implementation: Summer 2013

Potential: Private funding, Fort Concho

Located at the west end of the Parade Ground, the Post Bandstand represents one of the last exterior improvements for site development. The bandstand would enhance the site's appearance, provide a historic setting for public programs and concerts, and serve various community groups. The Fort Concho Board is working with local professional building and trade groups to craft a reconstruction plan.

Supporting planning document(s):2007 Site Review




- -

25,000 -

- - - - - 25,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Fort Concho Post BandstandFort Concho Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt

Projected

250$ 250 250 250 250



Notes:


1)


Street Address City State700 Block of S. Oakes San Angelo Texas

The Fort Concho Board and staff have ranked this project in the top five in its 2007 site review. Staff have estimated the materials for this project at $15,000. Labor costs, if project is bid out, doubles overall costs.Update/January 2009 Staff arranging meeting with San Angelo Home Builders Association to explore volunteer assistance in construction.


None

New outdoor concerts; new public events.

Utilities based on staff estimates.

65


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 100,000

Description:


Total -$


Funding Sources: Amount $ 1,000,000 $ 500,000


Potential funding: San Angelo Health Foundation, Meadows Foundation, and Houston

E t R

1,500,000$


Type B Sales Tax

Barracks 1 was renovated as the fort's Visitor Center as part of the major 1995 Regional Urban Design Assessment Team projects that transformed the surrounding acres into El Paseo de Santa Angela. Unfortunately, the project ran out of money and the east bay of Barracks 1 was left unfinished. A staff-board study has concluded that the restoration of this space must be tied to an overall building renovation to better serve our guests. This renovation would include an expanded gift shop, visitor orientation area and theatre, climate controlled quality display space, and administrative offices. Staff will partner with several area cultural agencies to complete a Cultural District Study in the spring of 2012. Formal planning of this Visitor Center will follow the recommendations of that study.





- 100,000

1,400,000 -

750,000 250,000 400,000 - - 1,500,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Fort Concho Visitors Center Restoration ImprovementsFort Concho Project Manager Robert Bluthardt

Projected

(10,000)$ (15,000) (17,500) (17,500) (17,500)



Notes:



630 S. Oakes San Angelo Texas

Project will focus on barracks 1; possibly barracks 2 and maybe partial reconstruction of Barracks 3-4.


Repairs and maintenance

Increased attendance: increased Gift Shop Sales; increased tour revenue; additional media attention

Extra Revenue

66


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 75,000

Description:


Total -$


Funding Sources: Amount $ 75,000 -


Potential: HOT allocation; private contributions

Utiliti t b d t t

75,000$

Design: 2-4 monthsImplementation: 4-6 months

Undetermined

The rear room of Officers' Quarters 1 lacks a proper floor and the entire rear section is showing signs of structural distress. Staff recommends a new concrete floor with a wooden floor to follow, relocation of utility pipes and lines, and new supports for the walls. A preliminary engineering report was completed in 2008. As this building is the city's VIP quarters and serves many guests and functions, these improvements are both aesthetic and functional to the building's future. The current room condition poses a major safety hazard to staff and contractors. Additionally, the dormers are failing and need repair.

Supporting planning document(s):2008 Engineering Report




7,000 68,000

-

- - - - - 75,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Fort Concho OQ 1 Rear Room & Roof RepairsFort Concho Project Manager: Robert Bluthardt

Projected

750$ 750 750 750 750 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500



Notes:


1)


Street Address City State111 East Ave. D San Angelo Texas

Increase in overall building usage.

Preliminary study by staff, and local architect; engineering report available. Full plans available in 60 days.


No impact

Increase in building rentals.

Utilities cost based on current events.Revenue increase

67


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18500$ 500 500 500 500 Damaged sign replacement

300,000$


Undetermined

Wayfinding refers to the system of signs & symbols placed at the entrances & throughout districts, campuses & more recently, entire cities. The San Angelo Convention & Visitors Bureau, City of San Angelo, COSADC/Chamber of Commerce & Angelo State University have jointly funded the development of a specifications & details manual for a city-wide wayfinding system was completed in 2010. Because one of the most frequently heard complaints businesses and destination operators hear is that visitors and newcomers to the city have difficulty finding our many sites of interest, cities must make the visitor/newcomer experience a positive one to ensure that tourists return and/or stay as long as possible. From an aesthetic standpoint, signs such as those contained in a typical wayfinding system help designate certain areas as unique or interesting for residents as well.

Supporting planning document(s):Wayfinding contract between San Angelo CVB and The Douglas Group, Staff Report to City Council regarding wayfinding

10,000 -

270,000 20,000

100,000 100,000 100,000 - - 300,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Wayfinding Phases I-IIIDevelopment Services Project Manager: AJ Fawver

Projected



Notes:




Wayfinding signage, large and small, sends messages to the visitor, investor, and local citizens about the quality & character of the city, and improve San Angelo's ability to attract and maintain economic development assets. Project locations have been outlined and preliminarily accepted by the Wayfinding Steering Committee.


1.) Signs will be installed in three phases per the Wayfinding Master Plan. Performance will be measured by ability to fabricate and installsigns in accordance with the master plan. 2.) Increased visitorship at local tourist sites. 3.) Higher tourist satisfaction surveys (per CVB)

68


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 1,000,000

Description:


Total -$




20% Match/COSA General Fund

5,000,000$

Design: Fall 2013-Spring 2014Implementation: Fall 2014

Transportation Alternatives Grant

Improve Pedestrian access in neighborhoods and around schools. To include sidewalks, sidewalk improvements, ped/bike crossing improvements, off-street bike/ped facilities, bike lanes, bus shelters, improved crosswalks, and crosswalks. This project will be primarily for neighborhoods located in northeast San Angelo.

Supporting planning document(s):Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Metropolitan Transportation Plan, Pedestrian-Transit Master Plan, COSA Comprehensive Plan



- 1,300,000 2,900,000

800,000

1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - 5,000,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Neighborhood Pedestrian Improvement Program MPO Project Manager: Doray Hill, Jr.

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - 20,000 - 20,000


Notes:


1)2)3)

120 E. 39th Street San Angelo Texas1202 East 22nd San Angelo Texas


Street Address City State1900 Ricks Drive San Angelo Texas

aesthetics

Project would be submitted under FHWA or FTA program grant call.


This project would have relatively low maintenance costs.Once the infrastructure is completed, future costs wouldinlcude re-stripping, minor sidewalk repairs andsignange replacement.

Provide a healthy alternative mode of transportation; Provide connectivity to areas of town; Provide non-motorized mobility; Improve neighborhood

69




-$ - 21,238

Description:


Total -$




126,238$


Undetermined

The Historic Santa Fe Passenger Depot is on the National Register of Historic Places, and as such is an integral part of the City's history. It is imperative that the City preserve the integrity of this great landmark. The Historic Orient-Santa Fe Depot was built in 1909 as the headquarters for the Texas Corporation of the KCM&O. The City acquired the historic building on November 15, 1993 and soon entered into a lease with the Historic Santa Fe Depot, Inc. for management of the historic building. The Depot celebrated its 100th anniversary in September 2010 and it remains one of the most recognized and photographed landmarks in the City. Projects include Labor costs to replace damaged roof tiles ($12,500); termite treatment ($4,238), install new security lights (2,500), Repair Interior Ceiling ($2,000), Install Automated Fresh Air Intake and Exhaust ($10,000), Repave/Seal Blacktop ($10,000), Install Ductless Air Conditioning System ($15,000) and Painting Exterior ($45,000).

Supporting planning document(s):Annual Building Inspection Form




- -

126,238

20,000 15,000 22,500 22,500 25,000 126,238$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Santa Fe Train Depot ImprovementsReal Estate Division/Office of City Attorney Project Manager: Cindy M. Preas

Projected




Notes:


1)


Street Address City State703 S. Chadbourne San Angelo Texas

In April 2008, a major storm hit San Angelo, causing damage to the tile roof, three ceiling water blisters in the interior, window damage, and dormer damage. Subsequently, the damage has progressed. Additionally, parking lot shows signs of stress due to the weight of transit buses. In 2009, the City spent $49,360 in painting the exterior of the Depot and installing new gutters. In 2012 the City repaired the dormer windows and purchased replacement roof tiles.


None

Increase in visitor and public bookings.

None

70




-$ - 1,825,000

Description:


Total -$




1,825,000$


Undetermined

The Spur Parking Garage services the downtown area including the new Stephen Central Library. The Spur Parking Garage must be renovated and repaired to meet City code regulations. Project: Primary Structural Steel Members must be: Cleaned and Sandblasted; apply coating and paint for rust protection; reinforce and/or replace specific structural steel members. Replacing existing staircase in its entirety. In addition, include the demolition of existing second, third and fourth level floor systems. Floor system removal will include removal or existing steel decks and reinforced concrete support slabs. Other features may include removal of any existing light poles and fixtures, restriping, tire stop replacement and updated signs.

Supporting planning document(s):Forensic Report, Construction Documents of Plans and Specifications, Survey, Lab Testing, Attorney Fees




- 50,000

1,500,000 275,000

- - - - - 1,825,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Spur Parking Garage Renovation and RepairReal Estate Div./Office of the City Attorney Project Manager: Cindy Preas

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/1820,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$


Notes:


1)


Street Address City State30 W Twohig Avenue San Angelo Texas

Property Revenue will increase based on rental parking slots.

In October 2010, the structural integrity of the Sppur Parking Garage was assessed to determine the factors contributing to the corrosion of steel components. On March 5, 2011, floors 2-4 were closed and use prohibited after load analysis revealed the primary structural building steel components cannot withstand the associated loading and will require bracing in the transverse direction.

It is recommended the project be completed in one phase ($1,825,000). If project is broken up into three phases costs are considerably higher ($2,950,000). Saving if completed as one phase $1,125,000


Loss of Revenue - Garage closed

Public Safety

None

71




-$ - -

Description:


Total -$



1,650,000$

Design: 2014/2015Implementation: 2014/2015

Type B Sales Tax

The intent of the renovation is to co-locate Lake View and Northern Little Leagues at the 29th Street Complex location in order to maximize efficiencies, minimize maintenance costs and to provide these leagues with new fields and facilities. The current intent is to develop two small complexes with three fields each (two standard and one t-ball) with separate concession and restrooms or one four-field quad with a shared building with restrooms and possibly separate concessions and two separate t-ball fields. Of course parking, lighting and other improvements would need to be made.Lake View Little League currently plays on three fields (two standard and one t-ball) on SAISD property east of Lake View High School. The City provides all landscape maintenance. The League provides facility maintenance and programming. Relocation of Lake View Little League would eliminate the City’s cost of maintenance at this location which currently runs about $36,000/year. Northern Little League currently plays on one field at the 29th Street Complex (the only field remaining after the complex was converted to mostly open space) and four fields at the 19th Street location (counting the challenger field). The City provides all landscape maintenance. The League provides facility maintenance and programming. Relocation of Northern Little League and conversion of the 19th Street location to practice fields (challenger field to remain) would reduce the City’s cost for maintenance from about $48,000/year to roughly $20,000/year. The current cost to maintain the 29th Street Complex is about $60,000 (down from about $120,000 prior to conversion). Again, the City only provides landscape maintenance at this location which is leased from the United States Army Corps of Engineers.

Supporting planning document(s):2001 and 2005 Parks and Recreation Master Plan




- 100,000

1,550,000 -

1,650,000 - - - - 1,650,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

29th Street Complex RenovationParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected


(36,000) (36,000) (36,000) (36,000) (36,000) (28,000) (28,000) (28,000) (28,000) (28,000)



Notes:



2929 Golf Course Rd San Angelo Texas

Project currently on hold, as of December 2012, due to maintenance cost commitment.


No impact

To increase the number of fields from 4 practice fields to 4 fully-improved little league and 2 t-ball fields; to allow for approximately 55 teams to play at the renovated complex; to allow for approximately 550 children to participate in little league baseball at the complex.

Operations and MaintenanceClose Lake View Little LeagueReduce Northern Little League

72


Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/143,219,787$ 42,635 -

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design 270,565 Construction 2,789,318 Other 177,539

Total 3,237,422$

Project Schedule: % Complete99%0%0%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 3,241,197 $ 21,225

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18155,500$ 160,000$ 165,000 170,000 175,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 100,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000

Donation from Historic Preservation and Old Town Conservancy

SalariesUtilitiesOperations and Maintenance

3,262,422$

Design: March 2011Construction: May 2011-2012Opening: April 2012

Type B Sales Tax Funds

Build a regional water park for all ages to promote tourism and economic growth in San Angelo. The City of San Angelo maintains and operates one Municipal Swimming Pool, built in 1938. A Community Aquatics Facility would provide the City of San Angelo and the region with a new recreational attraction with all the elements of a major water theme park. The new Aquatics Facility will be constructed on City-owned land along the Concho River enhancing the river. The park will provide an additional entertainment venue for the citizens of San Angelo and the Concho Valley region during the hot summer months. Security system installed December 2012. Landscaping is remaining.

Supporting planning document(s):Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plans 2001 and 2005




- 255,000

2,650,000 357,422

- - - - 3,262,422$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Community Aquatics FacilityRecreation Project Manager: MaryAnn Vasquez

Projected



Notes:


1)


Street Address City State18 E. Ave A San Angelo Texas

Project substantially complete April 2012 and opened Memorial weekend. Revenues for the season exceeded expectations at $188,000.


Loss of revenue from existing pool

Estimated revenue of $122,000.

73




-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




(12,500) (12,500) (12,500) (12,500) (12,500) Increased electrical costsIncreased revenue for summer camps & sport leaguesOperations and Maintenance

500,000$


Undetermined

Install air conditioning units at each Recreation Center (Carl Ray and Southside). Currently the centers do not have air conditioning, the gyms and meetings do have heating. The summer temperatures in the gym reach over 100 degrees. The gyms are rarely used until 6 pm because of the extreme heating conditions. All programming takes place in the mornings before Noon, limiting the number of paid campers to 60. Limited athletic programs take place after 6 pm but the gyms are still extremely hot for players and fans.





- - -

500,000

500,000 - - - - 500,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Air Conditioning at Recreation CentersParks and Recreation Project Manager: MaryAnn Vasquez

Projected



Notes:


1)2) Ben Ficklin San Angelo Texas


Street Address City State111 Santa Fe Park Drive San Angelo Texas

2-22-12: have had discussions with facilities maintenance about installation of cool roof and other alternatives that may be cost effective in cooling the gym portion of the building.


No impact

Increase the revenue program opportunities to include the use of the gym, currently no program takes place from Noon-6:00 pm.

74


Responsible Dept:


$195,000 75,000

Description:


Total 195,000$


100%0%


Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - - Maintenance provided by SASA

No Impact

270,000$

Design:Implementation:Phase IPhase II

Type B Sales Tax

Phase I-Lighting of two areas to include four additional fields. Increase participation for league and tournament play, with a direct economic impact on the sales tax dollars. Opportunity to invite and host more teams during league and tournament games. Installation of 1000 ft safety fence along Glenna Street to prevent errant balls from landing in the street, providing safety for the players and fans.Phase II-Repair of large parking lot, overlay and re-striping of current parking lot. Games attract a large number of fans. Addressing the limited parking and unmarked spaces will prevent accidents.

Supporting planning document(s):Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plans 2001 and 2005




- -

270,000 -

- - - - - 270,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Youth Soccer Complex at Glenna StParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18No Impact -$ - - - -


Notes:



1601 Glenna St San Angelo Texas

Phase I Improvements - irrigation, lighting, and safety fence were completed and installed in March 2008. Phase II parking lot paving and additional parking improvements are anticipated to be completed in 13/14. NOTE: Phase II is awaiting coordination with the San Angelo Soccer Association (SASA) who is covering 1/2 of the cost of the project. As of December 2012, we are still waiting on SASA for their matching funds.


Increase the number of games which can be played in the evening by up to six, depending on the time of year

75




175,000

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ 17,500 17,850 18,200 18,550

14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total- - - - - 175,000$

Bradford Neighborhood & School ParkParks Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

To develop the existing undeveloped property adjacent to the new Bradford Elementary School (property owned by SAISD) as a neighborhood and school park. Development would include a small pavilion or picnic shelter, some unique playground equipment to complement the equipment at the school, walkways, practice ball field space, some lighting, some irrigation, and some other basic park amenities.





- 5,000

170,000 -

175,000$

Design: 2013Implementation: Spring 2014

Type B Sales Tax




Notes:


1)

No impact

To create park visitation to an anticipated rate of 10,830 visitors each year.

Joint park development project with SAISD. Interlocal cooperation agreement with SAISD should be complete in March 2013. Design process will begin after that.




1202 E. 22nd St. San Angelo Texas

76


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - 15,000 15,250 15,500

14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total275,000 - - - 275,000$

Brentwood Neighborhood Park RenovationParks Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

Renovate the existing neighborhood park with a picnic shelter/pavilion, a playground, walkways, lighting, and landscaping. This project was identified as needed due to several reasons: the playground equipment does not meet current national safety standards and has outlived its reasonable lifespan of up to twenty years; walkways are not fully accessible; picnic shelter/pavilions are recognized as highly needed by both the 2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan; the existing irrigation system is poor; park and security lighting needs to be improved; and the aesthetic quality of the park needs to be improved. This project will also include development of the 2003, 4 acre addition to this park with the Jefferson Street pond with walkways, pond access, picnic tables, benches, etc. Brentwood Park was developed in the late 1950's and early 1960's.

Supporting planning document(s):2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master PlanParks Department internal needs assessments

Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File,

then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and

- 10,000

265,000 -

275,000$

Design: Implementation: 2014/2015

Type B sales tax

Based on renovation value.



Notes:


1)


Increase park visitation from an estimated 10,830 visitors each year to an estimated 16,245 visitors each year




1300 Block Howard San Angelo Texas

77


Responsible Dept:


-$ -

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - 12,000 12,500

14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total- 175,000 - - - 175,000$

Brown Neighborhood Park RenovationParks Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

Renovate the existing neighborhood park with a picnic shelter/pavilion, a playground, walkways, lighting, and landscaping. This project was identified as needed due to several reasons: the playground equipment does not meet current national safety standards and has outlived its reasonable lifespan of up to twenty years; walkways are not fully accessible; picnic shelter/pavilions are recognized as highly needed by both the 2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan; the existing irrigation system is poor; park and security lighting needs to be improved; and the aesthetic quality of the park needs to be improved. Brown Park was developed in 1952 and has not been renovated since that time.

Supporting planning document(s):2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master PlanParks Department internal needs assessments

Insert a picture of your proposed project here. Click on Insert in the menu bar, then Object… Click on the tab Create from File,

then click Browse… Browse to your picture, then click Insert and

- 5,000

170,000 -

175,000$


Type B sales tax

Operations and MaintenanceBased on renovation value



Notes:


1)

Based on renovation value.





300 Block Johnson Street and W Twohig Ave. San Angelo Texas

78


Responsible Dept:


-$ 110,500 -

Description:


Total 104,611$


Funding Sources: Amount$110,500


14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total- - - - 110,500$

Central Control IrrigationParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

The City recently purchased the components needed to set up the new Rio Concho Sports Complex and Community Park with a central control irrigation system. Park's staff is installing, in-house, the central control irrigation system controller at 18 park and sports field sites (22 controllers). This type of computerized automated system will allow the staff to control the settings, troubleshoot, receive data on problematic irrigation systems, monitor and utilize evapotranspiration data, etc. from a single office location. The conservation of water and the reduction of costs will be greatly improved with this new system. Substantial amounts of time (labor), fuel, and water will be saved. In addition, this controller system could also be used in future years to monitor/control lights at these locations, which would decrease the costs for labor, fuel, and electricity as well.





- 10,000

100,500

110,500$


Type B sales tax

General fund savings for labor, fuel, and water(Funds listed describe cost savings per year)

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18Labor, fuel, and water -$ 2,700 5,500 8,200 10,900


Notes:


1)

(Funds listed describe cost savings per year)

Annual water costs decreased up to 20% at these sites; Labor reduced by 450 man hours; Fuel reduced by 100 gallons for the Irrigation crews.

The cost for purchasing and installing central control systems is $5,000 per irrigation controller site. Parks is requesting 22 sites. As of December 2012, project is 95% complete and should be fully completed March 2013.



Completing Project $(170,086) Not Completing Project $25,324


79


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 115,000

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ 2,000 2,050 2,100 2,150 Increased use of water, supplies, electricity, and cleaning

Design plans complete from 2004




- -

100,000 15,000

115,000$

Design: 2013Implementation: 2013/2014

16/17 17/18 Future

Civic League Park, Additional Improvements (IWLC Basin 4)Parks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

ProjectedTotal

- - - 115,000$

This improvement was programmed during the design of the last expansion of the International Waterlily Collection. A shortage of funding however did not permit its implementation. Specifically, this improvement project includes the addition of the fourth raised basin in the northeast quadrant of the collection site (see picture below). Design was completed in 2004, however that design is being modified to be completed at a later date.

14/15 15/16


- -

Potential Grant FundingPotential funding from San Angelo Area Foundation

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18N/A -$ - - - -


Notes:


1)


Street Address City State900 W Beauregard and N Park San Angelo Texas


Increase the number of visitors from an estimated 12,635 each year to an estimated 14,440 each year


Increase the number of lilies displayed from 210 to 240 at the collection display

80


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




Undetermined


600,000$


Friends of Fairmount funding

Phase I of the Friends of Fairmount Master Plan recommended improvements which includes a new wider and more attractive entrance to Fairmount Cemetery and the first set of 2 columbaria (2 out of 6) on a closed internal road on the south side of the cemetery. The project includes design, construction and some limited landscaping.

Supporting planning document(s):Friends of Fairmount Cemetery Master Plan adopted by City Council on July 17, 2012.



- 60,000

500,000 40,000

16/17 17/18 Future Total600,000 - - - - 600,000$

Fairmount Cemetery -- Phase I ImprovementsParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected14/15 15/16



Notes:


1) 1120 West Avenue N. San Angelo Texas

increase safety and thus reduce accidents entering and exiting the cemetery.




allow for new revenue stream with sale of columbaria niches estimated at $25,000/year for over 20 years.

81


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 200,000

Description:


Total -$




Potential Lake Nasworthy Trust Fund Interest Account

Ongoing Maintenance

200,000$


Potential TPWD Trails Grant

This project includes the development of a 1.5 mile trail on the top of the hill at Hillside Drive and Gun Club Road. The proposed trail would be about 14 feet wide and constructed of crushed limestone. Signage would also be included.

Supporting planning document(s):Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan adopted by City Council on October 16, 2012.



- 15,000

180,000 5,000

16/17 17/18 Future Total- - - - - 200,000$

Hilltop Trail at Lake NasworthyParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White




Notes:


1) 2100 Gun Club Rd. San Angelo Texas




None

Improve safety by reducing pedestrian traffic off Hillside Drive

82


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 471,000

Description:


Total -$





Operating and Maintenance

471,000$


Potential TPWD State Boating Access Grant

Project includes the complete renovation of the main boating ramp at Middle Concho Park at Lake Nasworthy. The ramp would be widened from 2 to 4 lanes, additional parking would be provided, a new restroom facility with showers would be added, lighting improvements made, new signage added and improvements to walkways made and docking made. This project includes design work and permitting costs.




- 34,000

425,000 12,000

16/17 17/18 Future Total- - - - - 471,000$

Middle Concho Park Main Boat Ramp ImprovementsParks and Recreation Project Manager: Carl White




Notes:


1) Middle Concho East & West/Red Bluff Rd. San Angelo Texas

double the number of boats that can utilize the ramp at one time from 2 to 4.




increase the Middle Concho Park entrance gate fee revenues by an estimated 15-20 % due to increased usage.

83


Responsible Dept:


-$ 3,200,000 400,000

Description:


Total -$


Funding Sources: Amount$3,200,000

$325,000 $325,000 $150,000

Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - $75,000 $75,500 $76,000

Type B sales taxStormwater fundingPrivate fundraising

Based on proposed design and current rates of maintenancefor lighting, landscape services, and general cleaning and

4,000,000$

Design: 2012Implementation: 2014/2015

State Grant

The Red Arroyo Trail project has been a dream for many for a long time. The vision for this project is to develop a multiple-use trail system along the Red Arroyo from Sherwood Way in the West to Knickerbocker Road in the East and South from the confluence near College Hills Blvd. to Sunset Drive. This project will provide for an excellent alternative transportation network as well as a fantastic amenity for recreation. Included with this project will be a 3-mile, 10' wide multiple-use trail (for non-motorized travel); three small parking areas; at least three small pocket parks; an 18-hole disc golf course; some landscaping; an off-leash area for dogs; some lighting; signage; drinking fountains; benches; and restroom facilities. As of December 2012, we are about 60% complete with design, which is being performed by City Staff.

Supporting planning document(s):Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan (2001) and Update (2005); San Angelo Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2005); MPO Bike and Pedestrian Trail Plan 2006.




- 300,000

3,665,000 35,000

400,000 - - - 4,000,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Red Arroyo TrailParks & Recreation Project Manager: Clinton Bailey

Projected



Notes:


1)2)3)

to Knickerbocker in the East to Sunset Drive in the South


Street Address City Statevaried -- runs from Sherwood Way in the West San Angelo Texas

$3,200,000 in funding secured from TPWD Grant


No impact

Increase the number of non-motorized vehicle transportation connection by about 3 miles; generate an estimated 43,320 users each year.


84


Responsible Dept:


762,907$ 50,993 -

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land - Design 65,000 Construction 697,907 Other -

Total 762,907$



$5,000


Rio Vista Neighborhood Park RenovationParks & Recreation Department Project Manager: Carl White

Projected16/17

Renovate the existing neighborhood park with a picnic shelter/pavilion, a playground, walkways, lighting, and landscaping. This project was identified as needed due to several reasons: the playground equipment does not meet current national safety standards and has outlived its reasonable lifespan of up to twenty years; walkways are not fully accessible; picnic shelter/pavilions are recognized as highly needed by both the 2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan; the existing irrigation system is in poor condition; park and security lighting needs to be improved; and the aesthetic quality of the park needs to be improved. Rio Vista Park was developed in 1971 and has not been renovated since that time. City to install playgrounds and trails in-house.


17/1814/15 15/16

Supporting planning document(s):2001 and 2005 updated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan

- - - -

Parks Department internal needs assessments




- 65,000

748,900 -

813,900$

Design: Spring 2011Implementation: Spring 2012Completion: Spring 2013

Section 108 Loan & CDBG Funds4B Half-Cent Sales Tax FundsDonation from Architect

Operations and MaintenanceBased on some additional improvements to the park



Notes:


1)

Based on some additional improvements to the park


Project is mostly complete. As of December 2012, contractor has reached substantial completion. City to install playgrounds and walking trail.


Street Address City StateBen Ficklin Rd. and Ave. X San Angelo Texas


85


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$




14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total650,000$

This project is to add elements to the Rio Concho Community Park & Texas Bank Sports Complex that were originally envisioned such as a pavilion next to the playgrounds and a restroom facility at quad 4. This project also includes a restroom at quad 2 which was not originally envisioned but is now needed based on our experience with rentals, events and tournaments. The pavilion is needed because the park is intended to serve as a community park but currently can't meet that need unless a pavilion is added which would help to better host community events, private events and general park usage.

Supporting planning document(s):2012 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan.

Rio Concho Community Park & Texas Bank Sports ComplexParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

Implementation: 2014

Type B sales tax

85,000 - - 565,000

Parks and Recreation internal needs assessment.


- 35,000

615,000 -

650,000$

Design:

Undetermined

Operations and maintenance.



Notes:


1) 1822 River Dr.

Restrooms: to increase the number of tournaments, rentals and special events.




No impact

Pavilion: to increase community park attendance from an estimated 5,415 to an anticipated 14,600 visitors each year.

San Angelo Texas

86


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - 15,000 15,375

14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total150,000$

Renovate the existing neighborhood park to meet the desires of the neighborhood (Greater Santa Rita Home Owners' Association) and adjacent Santa Rita Elementary School. Improvements could likely include a new irrigation system, walkways, lighting, unique play features, tennis court refurbishment, picnic areas, some landscaping and general park improvements.

Supporting planning document(s):2012 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan.

Santa Rita Neighborhood Park RenovationParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

Implementation: 2016/2017

Type B sales tax

- - 150,000 - -

Parks and Recreation internal needs assessment.


- 10,000

140,000 -

150,000$

Design:

Potential Homeowner Association fundraising




Notes:


1) 1111 S. Madison St.




No impact

To create park visitation to an anticipated rate of 10,830 visitors each year.

San Angelo Texas

87


Responsible Dept:


-$ -

Description:


Total -$





Operating and Maintenance

438,600$


Potential TPWD State Boating Access Grant

Project includes the complete renovation of the main boating ramp at South Concho Park at Lake Nasworthy. The ramp would be widened from 2 to 4 lanes, additional parking would be provided, a new restroom facility with showers would be added, lighting improvements made, new signage added and improvements to walkways made and docking made. This project includes design work and permitting costs.




- 32,000

395,000 11,600

16/17 17/18 Future Total438,600 - - - - 438,600$

South Concho Park Main Boat Ramp ImprovementsParks and Recreation Project Manager: Carl White




Notes:


1) 850 South Concho Dr. San Angelo Texas




None

Double the number of boats that can utilize the ramp at one time from 2 to 4.

88


Responsible Dept:


-$ - -

Description:


Total -$



Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - - None

275,000$


Undetermined

Landscape refurbishment of Sunken Garden Park with enhancements to improve access and enjoyment of the new Sculpture Garden. Improvements to include a new irrigation system, new turf in targeted locations, improved accessibility with ramps and stairs, walkways to and around the sculptures and improved lighting.




- 25,000

250,000 -

- - - 275,000 $0 275,000$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total

Sunken Garden Park and Sculpture GardenParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected



Notes:


1) 704 S. David Street San Angelo Texas




None

increase visitation to the park and sculpture garden by about 12,000 visitors a year.

89


Responsible Dept:

Financial Plan:Prior BudgetYears 12/13 13/146,853,196$ 8,583,451 -

Description:

Project Cost: Estimated Project-to-DateROW/Easements/Land 1,034,574 Design 1,531,301 Construction 7,318,763 Other 388,657

Total 10,273,295$


59%

Funding Sources: Amount $ 12,993,175 $ 1,856,012 $ 587,460


14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total- - - - - 15,436,647$

Concho River Dredging, Bank Stabilization, & Trails ImprovementsParks & Recreation Project Manager: Carl White

Projected

Design and construction of the North Concho River Parks and Trail system, located along the course of the North Concho River from Kirby Community Park to Rio Concho Community Park. Design and construction of all physical improvements in the area including trails, lookout points, bank stabilization, lighting, signage and accessibility and connectivity improvements with the following exception. The section of the project from Kirby Park (south side) to 14th Street will only be conceptually designed. Improvements will focus on connectivity and access to the river, provision of desirable destination spaces and maximizing public recreation opportunities and interaction with the river. Project also included substantial dredging of portions of the river, primarily between Houston Harte and 14th Street, under supervision of the UCRA. About 1.5 million cubic feet of silt were removed. Project includes trail section on SAHF property on south side of river from Irving St. upriver to Girl Scout HQs and trail section from Bell St. terminus and across Bell St to the river overlook at the Rio Concho Community ParkSupporting planning document(s):2004 KDC-Turner Study; hydrogeological assessments

1,034,574 1,531,301

12,482,115 388,657

15,436,647$

Design: 2006 - 2012Implementation: 2009 - 2013

Type B sales taxFederal, State, and Local Grantsstorm water improvements funding

Operating and Maintenance Costs

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - -


Notes:


1)2)

No impact

Increase the overall river parks and trail system use from an estimated 200,000 visitors annually to over 250,000 visitors annuallyImprove the quality of the water in the river in the areas dredged by up to 15%

Dredging is complete and was conducted from about 14th Street downriver to about the point where Sulphur Draw feeds into the river.

Bank stabilization and other improvements began October 2011. As of December 2012, the improvement project is at about 60% completion overall, counting contractor's work and in-house work. The project is anticipated to be substantially complete August 2013. Bank stabilization of the section from Sulpher Draw upriver to 1st Street was approved and funed.



O. C. Fisher Reservoir Dam to Bell Street San Angelo Texas impoundment

90


Responsible Dept:


-$ 17,936 19,874

Description:


Total -$




Undetermined

Repair costs reduced

47,856$


Public Health Emergency State Grant

The Public Information Office lacks adequate backup equipment for when technology inevitably fails. PIO also lacks adequate funding to systematically purchase replacement and/or backup photography, videography and computer equipment, all of which is necessary to disseminate information -- particularly the airing of City Council and board meetings -- to the public. Health Services has applied for a public health emergency preparedness discretionary funds state grant that would fund 90% of the cost of a new server for Channel 17. (The remaining 10% will come from the PIO's operating budget.) That would leave another $29,920 in equipment needs: $19,874 for video equipment in the City Council chambers, $4,668 in videography equipment, and $5,378 in photo equipment.




- - -

47,856

Public Information Equipment ReplacementPublic Information Project Manager: Anthony Wilson

Projected

4,668 5,378 - - - 47,856$ 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total



Notes:


1) 500 Rio Concho Drive San Angelo Texas

Council chambers equipment: Sony Anycast Station Live Content Producer, $12,999; 4 Robotic Cameras, $3,280; HDD DVD recorder, $3,595. Channel 17 server: $17,936; Videography equipment: Sony HVR-NX5U camera, $3,999; Sony HXR-FMU128 Flash Memory Unit, $669; Photography equipment: Canon EOS 7D SLR Digital Camera Body, $1599; Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Zoom Lens, $1,179; Canon EF70-200mm f/2.8 IS II USM Telephoto Lens, $2,099; Canon Speedlight 580EX II Flash, $501




We would face repair costs that could be small.Eventually, we would have to replace equipment throughthe operating budget.

Number of Council and board meetings aired, number of original programs produced, number of photos posted online.

91


Responsible Dept:


117,000$ 120,000

Description:


Total 117,000$


0%


Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$

Communications Technology UpgradePublic Safety Communications Project Manager: Victor Vasquez


- - - 130,000 150,000 517,000$

This hardware update includes the actual computer equipment (servers) that our Intergraph software needs to operate on. This also includes the operating systems and the backup solutions so that records are securely stored. The servers are currently Dell servers, and Dell does not support servers over 4 years old. All information transmitted to Public Safety personnel must be accurate and up-to-date. It is imperative we (Public Safety) stay current on the technology for citizen, firemen and officer safety.





- - -

517,000

517,000$

Phase 1 2008Phase 2 2013

General FundUndetermined

No significant change in operating costs.

Operating Budget Impact if NOT Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000


Notes:


1)

Increase in repair costs as equipment will be out ofmaintenance

New technology is required to maintain a higher standard of performance and public safety. Communications had a total 209,764 calls in 2011. Without reliable computers the Public Safety Communications would not be able to dispatch services to the Citizens of San Angelo.


Street Address City State323 E. Beauregard San Angelo Texas

92


Responsible Dept:


-$ - 182,600

Description:


Total -$




Mobile Data TerminalsFire Project Manager: Brian Dunn


- - - - - 182,600$

This is the moblie data terminals for the ambulances and fire trucks. The current version we are using is obsolete and we can't purchase parts when they break. The police department has already switched to the system we are asking for.




- -

182,600 -

182,600$


Possibly out of new unattached ambulance

We will have to budget about $8500 per year for air card costs



Notes:


1)

costs.

We have to have a system to operate.

This will positively impact response times

If this isn't updated it will have an impact on response times.

30 MDT'S @ $4,110 = $123,300----- 30 MOUNTS @ $475 = $14,250------- 35 AIRCARDS @ $50 = $1,750--- 6 TABLETS FOR THE AMBULANCES @ $3,800 = $22,800 ---WIRE 4 STATIONS AS HOTSPOTS @ $3,000 = $12,000--- ONE YEAR OF AIRTIME FOR AIRCARDS $8,500


Street Address City StateCity Wide San Angelo Texas

93


Responsible Dept:


100,000$ 25,000 25,000

Description:


Total 125,000$


47%


Operating Budget Impact if Completed: 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18-$ - - - - No impact

The IT Department has increased the amount of servers from 35 to 37 and anticipate purchasing another 3 within the next year to replace old servers. Due to the increase in servers, we have also needed to add racks, battery backups (UPS), wire management, and remote console appliances. With the increase of servers, switches, and routers, we are requesting we increase our yearly maintenance to $35,000. In order to stay current with technology and maintain optimal proficiency, our servers/switches/routers/UPS's should be replaced on a 4 to 5 year plan. Rotation upgrades of the Core Servers include: Exchange Email Server, Authentication Servers, Antivirus server, Mail Security, Content Filtering, GIS Servers, AS/400, Risk Server, Intranet Server, Click2Gov Server, Channel 17 Distribution Server, Airport File Server, VoIP phone servers, Storage Backup Units, Infrastructure Switches, Routers, UPS, and Firewall Security.




- - -

250,000

250,000$

Design: Implementation: On Going

General Fund

14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 Future Total25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - 250,000$

Server UpgradesInformation Technology Project Manager: John Eades

Projected



Notes:


1)

IT has been working on server virtualization. This allows us to run more servers on fewer physical servers. We have 3 physical Servers running 11 Virtual Servers.

IT is working on Thin Client deployment. Desktop PCs are replaced with a less expensive server clients saving money on PC purchases. As thin client use increases, another server may become necessary, thereby increasing the cost and number of server upgrades.

Increase disk storage capacity for the GIS Maps, Y drive, Z drive, and system backups


Street Address City72 W College San Angelo Texas

State

No impact

IT work orders completed same day-2451 or 60% Network up time-99.872% AS400 time available 87.45%


94


Responsible Dept:


-$ 65,000

Description:


Total -$




Purchase IBM Power 7 ServerInformation Technology Project Manager: John Eades


- - - - - 65,000$

Purchase a new IBM Power 7 Server (8202 Model E4C) to replace the IBM iSeries 520 AS400, 8 years old, that is reaching end of life. Future releases of the HTE software will require higher levels of the IBM operating system. The IBM Power 7 Server system will run the entire city's financials, water billing, permits, work orders, inventory, fleet management, and other modules.

Supporting planning document(s):No supporting documents at this time. Working with IBM and Sungard to determine correct computer configuration and price.The cost is estimated.



- - -

65,000

65,000$


Saving on the three years of software and hardware maintenance



Notes:


1)

City will not be able to update the HTE software at some unspecifed time in the near future. Working with Sungardto determine that date

Software Maintenance for the AS400 increased 25%, based on the age of the AS400, to $7,700.00.

The City will not be able to update the HTE software at some unspecified time in the near future. Currently working with Sungard to determine that date. This project needs to be funded in advance in order for the maintenance savings to occur.




72 W College San Angelo Texas

95

City of San Angelo2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan

Level 3 Future Projects

City Operation Facility Emergency Mgmt Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Generator Replacement General Fund 50,000

City Operation Facility Fire Fire Administration Offices Remodel General Fund 600,000

Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Acoustical Banners HOT,SASSRA 150,000

Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Ice Plant HOT,Hockey Team 75,000

Community Facility Civic Events Bill Aylor Sr. Memorial River Stage Improvements HOT,CVB Contrib,Gen Fund 1,000,000

Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Entryway Improvements HOT,SASSRA 100,000

Community Facility Civic Events Convention Center Exhibit Hall 1/2c Sales Tax 10,000,000

Community Facility Civic Events Convention Center Walkway HOT/1/2c sales tax/Hotel 100,000

Community Facility Civic Events Coliseum Sound System Amplifiers HOT/410/SASSRA Contribution 50,000

Community Facility Fire Prevention Fire Safety City Other‐Donations,Grants,Contrib 970,000

Community Facility Municipal Court Municipal Court Addition General Fund 182,400

Community Facility Operations Combined Maintenance Facility General Fund ‐ CO 750,000

Community Facility Parks Parking for Senior Centers General Fund 275,000

Community Park Parks Belaire Neighborhood Park General Fund 550,000

Community Park Parks Blackshear Neighborhood Park General Fund 350,000

Community Park Parks Bluffs Neighborhood Park General Fund 550,000

Community Park Parks College Hills East Neighborhood Park General Fund 300,000

Community Park Parks Exall Addition Pocket Park General Fund 99,000

Community Park Parks Kirby Community Park, Additional Improvements General Fund 600,000

Community Park Parks Northern Lakeview Neighborhood Park General Fund 450,000

Community Park Parks Paseo Irrigation General Fund 60,000

Community Park Parks Restroom Facilities, Neighborhood Parks General Fund 450,000

Community Park Parks Rio Concho Trail Extension to GFAB Housing General Fund 1,250,000

Community Park Parks South Concho Neighborhood Park Renovation 1/2¢ Sales Tax 325,000

Community Park Parks Southland East Neighborhood Park General Fund 660,000

Community Park Parks Lake Nasworthy Park Improvements Grants/Lake fund 5,000,000

Community Park Parks South Concho Park Trail General Fund/Grants 199,500

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: 24th St. at Blum St. General Fund 3,749,220

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: 30th Street at Day Elementary General Fund 345,600

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Beauregard Ave. – Campus to North Concho General Fund 2,986,335

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Bell Street at Koberlin St. General Fund 2,818,530

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Bradford St. at 24th St. General Fund 688,095

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Coke St. at East Angelo Draw General Fund 2,039,310

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: College Hills at North Fork of Red Arroyo General Fund 4,782,105

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: College Hills Blvd. at the South Fork of the General Fund 4,706,910

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Glenwood Dr. – Harrison to Greenwood General Fund 1,009,530

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Glenwood Dr. @ Howard General Fund 1,055,295

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Goodfellow Draw at Evelyn Ave. General Fund 1,317,600

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Howard St. at Brentwood Park General Fund 59,130

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Howard Street from North to Webster General Fund 397,305

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Lester Ln. at Tres Rios Dr. General Fund 140,535

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Lindenwood Dr. at Vista Del Arroyo General Fund 746,955

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Loop 306 Access Road at Eckerd’s General Fund 2,279,340

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Madison St – Avenue J to Algerita General Fund 232,065

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Monroe St. at Sulfur Draw Park General Fund 615,870

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Pecan St at 3rd St. General Fund 970,785

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Preusser St – Lowrie to Schroeder General Fund 785,700

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Regent Blvd. at Gordon Blvd. General Fund 2,879,145

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Southwest Blvd. at the South Fork of the General Fund 4,790,880

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Sul Ross St. at Sunset Dr. General Fund 1,662,390

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: Taylor St, at Conchita St. General Fund 3,356,370

Infrastructure ‐ Stormwater Stormwater Remediation of Drainage Issue: 400 Block of E. 14th St General Fund 8,000,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations Portable Traffic Signal General Fund 100,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Edmund Blvd. from Van Buren to Howard St. General Fund 858,200

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Jefferson St. from Junius St. to Houston Harte General Fund 3,433,117

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 19th St. from Concho River to Lillie St. General Fund 2,045,350

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 28th St. from 29th St. to Armstrong St. General Fund 822,017

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 37th St. from Bell St. to Pruitt Dr. General Fund 455,983

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 41st St. from Coliseum Dr. to Bowie St. General Fund 2,483,017

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of 42nd St. from Coliseum Dr. to Armstrong St. General Fund 4,656,133

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Austin St. from Knickerbocker Rd. to Ave. N General Fund 1,577,800

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Avenue N from Bryant Blvd to Saint Marys General Fund 9,056,017

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Baze St. from Houston Harte to Culwell St. General Fund 307,683

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Beauregard Ave. from Taylor St. to Sherwood Way General Fund 942,875

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Bell St. from Railroad Tracks North to 37th St. General Fund 2,910,850

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Ben Ficklin Rd. from Becker Ln. to Country Club Rd. General Fund 1,889,250

Total Project

CostsProject Type Division Project Title Proposed Funding

96

City of San Angelo2013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan

Level 3 Future Projects

Total Project

CostsProject Type Division Project Title Proposed FundingInfrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Ben Ficklin Rd. from Bryant Blvd. to Bryant Blvd. General Fund 1,130,533

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Bowie St. from 24th St. to 47th St. General Fund 4,950,233

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of College Hills Blvd from Beauregard Ave to Sunset Blvd General Fund 11,740,467

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of College Hills Blvd. from Loop 306 to Valley View General Fund 4,754,583

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Cox Ln. from Sunset Blvd. to East Cox Ln. General Fund 854,183

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Culwell St. from Poe St. to Buchanan St. General Fund 1,835,900

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of East 14th St. from Chadbourne St. to Poe St. General Fund 5,021,417

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of East 19th St. from Bryat Blvd. to Lille St. General Fund 1,514,883

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of East 25th St. from Main St. to Poe St. General Fund 1,049,783

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Edmund Blvd. from Concho River to Bryant Blvd. General Fund 6,958,083

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Executive Dr. from Sunset Dr. to Knickerbocker Rd. General Fund 1,153,950

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Foster Rd. from Currier Ln. to Jackson St. General Fund 2,292,550

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Harris Ave. from Main St. to Bell St. General Fund 2,547,283

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Highland Ave. from Bryant Blvd. to Hill St. General Fund 665,467

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Howard St. from Pecos to Houston Harte Fwy. General Fund 876,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Hughes St. from Buchanan St. to Bell St. General Fund 1,583,483

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Huntington Ave. from Millbrook Dr. to Sunset Dr. General Fund 1,149,583

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Irving St. from Concho River to Washington St. General Fund 1,734,733

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Jackson St. from Avenue N to Knickerbocker Rd. General Fund 4,353,733

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Marx St. from 29th St. to 24th St. General Fund 1,437,750

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Mercedes St. from City Limit Line to Glenna Dr. General Fund 2,279,467

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Middle Concho Dr. from Red Bluff Ln. to the West General Fund 1,845,400

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Oakes St. from Harris Ave.to 14th St. General Fund 806,767

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Old Ballinger Hwy from North Bell St. to Pruitt Dr. General Fund 2,838,050

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Pecan St. from 7th St. to 14th St. General Fund 944,450

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Pecos St. from Concho River to Howard St. General Fund 3,003,117

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Red Bluff Rd. from Knickerbocker Rd. to Middle Concho General Fund 4,955,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Rio Concho Dr. from Magdalene St. to Roosevelt St. General Fund 2,329,550

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Riverside Golf Club Rd. from 29th St. to Bryant Blvd. General Fund 1,103,150

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Smith Blvd. from Pulliam St. to Houston Harte General Fund 1,748,900

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of South Concho Dr. from Sierra Vista to Knickerbocker Rd. General Fund 4,847,017

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Southland Blvd. from Knickerbocker Rd. to Blue Ridge Tr. General Fund 1,478,983

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Sunset Dr. from Knickerbocker Rd. south to railroad tracks General Fund 1,163,650

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Taylor St. from Beauregard Ave. to Live Oak St. General Fund 791,650

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Reconstruction of Blumentritt Rd. from FM 1223 General Fund 240,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Rio Concho Drive Widening & Beautification General Fund 500,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Traffic Calming Proposal #1 Grant‐Fed Stimulus Funding 1,315,527

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Engineering Traffic Calming Proposal #2 General Fund 350,000



Infrastructure ‐ Streets Operations Spring Creek Park Road Improvements Other‐Nasworthy Trust Fund 215,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Operations Backup Power Supply for Signalized Intersections General Fund 531,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations Video Detection General Fund 557,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations School Zone Flashers General Fund 285,000

Infrastructure ‐ Streets Traffic Operations Signal Cabinets General Fund 78,000

Infrastructure ‐ Water Fort Concho Fort Concho Drainage Correction General Fund 225,000

Infrastructure ‐ Water Water Utilities Hickory Water Supply Development Phase II Water Fund,1/2¢ Sales Tax 25,400,000

Infrastructure ‐ Water Water Utilities Hickory Water Supply Development Phase III Water Fund,1/2¢ Sales Tax 14,300,000

Pedestrian Engineering Pedestrian Facilities Other‐TIRZ,1/2¢ Sales Tax 2,500,000

Pedestrian Operations Countdown Pedestrian Signal Indications General Fund 30,000

244,115,4692013‐2018 Capital Improvement Plan Level 3 Future Projects Total

97

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ADOPTING THE 2013-2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM

WHEREAS, the City Charter for the City of San Angelo, Texas, provides that the City Manager shall prepare and submit to the City Council a multi-year capital program before the final date for submission of the budget; and, WHEREAS, on February 21, 2013 the City Manager presented a 2013-2018 capital program, which revises and extends the 2012-2017 capital program adopted by the City Council on April 17, 2012; and, WHEREAS, the contents of the 2013-2018 capital program comply with the requirements Section 59A of the City Charter for the City of San Angelo; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 59A of the City Charter for the City of San Angelo, the City Council by resolution shall adopt the capital program with or without amendment after public hearing and on or before adoption of the annual budget. WHEREAS, as of this date, the 2013 – 2014 annual budget has not yet been adopted; WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 59A of the City Charter for the City of San Angelo, after compliance with all publication and notice requirements, a public hearing for City Council to consider adoption of the proposed 2013-2018 capital program was held on March 19, 2013. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:

SECTION 1 The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance

are bound to be true and correct. SECTION 2 It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at

which this resolution was passed and adopted was open to the public as required and that public notice of the time, place, and purpose of said meeting was given as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Local Government Code. SECTION 3 The 2013-2018 capital program is hereby adopted by majority vote of the City Council without amendment, subject to deletion, modification or suspension during the course of the fiscal year based on events, changes in technology or other circumstances which justify such action.

PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2013. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin W. New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Daniel Valenzuela, City Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan

2013-2018 CIP Calendar 11/20/2012 Discuss CIP with City Council 12/10/2012 Budget Division sent out CIP forms

and instructions to divisions 12/20/2012 Projects submitted by divisions 1/31/2013 Committee reviewed draft CIP 2/7-12/2013 Public meetings 2/19/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council 2/26/2013 City Council Strategic Planning

Meeting 3/5/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council 3/19/2013 Adoption of the CIP

2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan At the strategic planning session, we defined capital

improvement projects with this approach: • Level 1 – Infrastructure Priority • Level 2 – Other projects within 5 years • Level 3 – Other projects outside 5 years

2013-2018 Capital Improvement Plan # of Projects Amount of Project ($)

Level 1 – Infrastructure 33 $402,808,769

Level 2 – All Others 48 84,679,315

Level 3 – Outside 5 years 116 244,115,469

Total 197 $731,603,553

2013-2018 CIP Calendar 11/20/2012 Discuss CIP with City Council 12/10/2012 Budget Division sent out CIP forms

and instructions to divisions 12/20/2012 Projects submitted by divisions 1/31/2013 Committee reviewed draft CIP 2/7-12/2013 Public meetings 2/19/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council 2/26/2013 City Council Strategic Planning

Meeting 3/5/2013 Discuss CIP with City Council 3/19/2013 Adoption of the CIP

City of San Angelo Engineering Services



From: Clinton Bailey, City Engineer


Contact: Clinton Bailey, Development Services, 657-4203

Caption: Discussion of prohibiting commercial vehicles from using certain streets and parking in certain areas within the San Angelo city limits and any action in connection thereto

Summary: The City of San Angelo Code of Ordinances contains articles which enable the City to prohibit commercial vehicles from using certain streets and from parking in certain areas within the San Angelo city limits.

From observation, it appears that the increase in commercial vehicle traffic within the City is primarily due to the following:

1. Construction equipment and construction materials delivery vehicles (dump trucks, tractor trailers, concrete trucks etc.) associated with the recent and significant increase commercial and residential land development; and,

2. Commercial property servicing businesses whose primary function is the delivery of materials and equipment to offsite locations using tractor trailers and other large commercial vehicles.

History: This item was requested by Councilman Dwain Morrison.

Financial Impact: n/a

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

Neighborhood Vision and Transportation Vision


There are four sections in San Angelo's Code of Ordinances which address the usage and access of and by commercial vehicles. These are summarized below and excerpts provided as attachments. Article 10.100 of the City's Code of Ordinances defines commercial vehicles, as well as laying out the requirements for where commercial vehicles may and may not be used. Section 10.107(g)(3) lists street segments along which, when signs are erected giving notice, commercial vehicles cannot be operated except to deliver or pick up merchandise. 10.107(g)(4) requires these vehicles to immediately exit the street once they have picked up or delivered as intended. Article 10.1200 of the City's Code of Ordinances addresses routes which are required as the sole routes for the transportation of hazardous materials. It also defines hazardous materials, and provides exceptions - such as repair, retail

delivery, and transfer. Lastly, it addresses the parking or storing of vehicles containing hazardous materials, signage, and responsibilities of the drivers operating such vehicles. Article 10.1000 of the City's Code of Ordinances prohibits the parking of commercial vehicles on a street or lot in a residential district, or on a street bordering a residential district. It then lists exceptions in Section 10.1005, under which such parking may occur temporarily or when meeting setbacks and located on private property. Lastly, Section 412 of the Zoning Ordinance addresses commercial vehicle peripherally, only by limiting the number of delivery and pickup of materials by commercial vehicles to home occupations. Staff recommends that the City Council provide Staff with specific direction regarding any desired or proposed modifications to existing City ordinances related to this issue.

Attachments: Excerpts from City of San Angelo Code of Ordinances

Presentation: Clinton Bailey, City Engineer

Publication: n/a


AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services (03/07/13)

Approved by Legal: n/a

ARTICLE 10.100 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS GENERALLY

Sec. 10.107 Miscellaneous Driving Rules

(g) Commercial Vehicle Prohibited from Using Certain Streets:

(1) A commercial vehicle for the purpose of this article is defined as every vehicle designed, maintained, or used primarily for the transportation of property and whose gross weight exceeds three and one-half (3-1/2) tons. This article never shall be construed to include vehicles commonly known as pickup trucks.

(2) This section shall not apply to persons operating police, fire, emergency, maintenance, or other similar vehicles at the direction of the city, County of Tom Green or State of Texas.

(3) When signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall operate a commercial vehicle, except as provided under the following paragraph, on any of the following streets or parts of streets.

(A) Texas Avenue between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.

(B) Avenue X between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.

(C) Avenue Y between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.

(D) Avenue Z between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.

(E) San Jacinto between Foster Street and Bryant Boulevard.

(F) Iris between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.

(G) River Oakes between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.

(H) Penrose between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.

(I) Windham between Christoval Road and Ft. McKavitt Road.

(J) Greer Street between Fort McKavitt Road and Christoval Road.

(K) Churchill Boulevard between Margie Street and Christoval Road.

(L) Meadow Drive between Mimosa Drive and FM 2105.

(M) On 30th Street between the east gate to the Hirschfeld Steel facilities and Irving Street.

(N) Field Street between Junius Street and Howard Street.

(O) 48th Street between Lake Drive and Chadbourne Street.

(P) Murphy Street between LaCruz Street and Currier Street.

(Q) Amistad Road beginning at Robin Hood Trail and extending one thousand and four hundred seventy feet (1,470') north.

(R) Avenue K between the east entrance to the Water Department Plant and South Concho Park Drive.

(S) Marie Street between Beacon Street and LaFollette Street.

(T) On Beacon Street between a point two hundred fifty-five feet (255') east of Bell Street and Marie Street.

(U) Spaulding Street between Baze Street and Bell Street.

(V) Koberlin Street between Main Street and Bell Street.

(W) Preusser Street between Main Street and Bell Street.

(X) Harris Avenue between Main Street and Bell Street.

(Y) Dellwood Drive between Christoval Road and Edgewood Drive.

(Z) Edgewood Drive between South Chadbourne (F. M. 1223) and Dellwood Drive.

(AA) Avenue Q between Bryant Boulevard and Chadbourne Street.

(BB) Currier Street, between Texas Avenue and Avenue V.

(CC) Avenue H between Hill Street and Irving Street.

(DD) Avenue I between Hill Street and Irving Street.

(EE) Avenue J between Hill Street and Irving Street.

(FF) Avenue K between Hill Street and Irving Street.

(GG) Fort McKavitt Road between Paint Rock Road and River Oakes Street.

(HH) Hobbs Street between Christoval Road and Lipan Drive.

(II) Logan Street between Christoval Road and Sellers Drive.

(JJ) Sellers Street between Paint Rock Road and Logan Street.

(KK) Cox Lane between Ben Ficklin Road and Foster Road.

(LL) Avenue G between Irving and Hill Streets.

(MM) Pecos Street between the northern section of David Street and Howard Street.

(NN) Old Christoval Road from Paint Rock Road to Chadbourne Street.

(4) Commercial vehicles may be operated on the above-named streets and parts of streets only for the purpose of delivering or picking up materials or merchandise and then only by entering such street at the intersection nearest the destination of the vehicle and proceeding thereon no farther than the nearest intersection thereafter.

ARTICLE 10.1200 ROUTES FOR VEHICLES TRANSPORTING HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Sec. 10.1201 Vehicle Routes

(a) No person shall operate or permit the driving or operation of any truck or transporting vehicle under their control carrying hazardous material over any street, alley, or other public way within the corporate limits of the city, except upon the following portions of the following streets, which are hereby designated as "truck routes."

(1) US Highway 67: from the west San Angelo city limits to Loop 306

(2) Loop 306: from US Highway 67 to US Highway 87

(3) US Highway 87: from Loop 306 south to the San Angelo city limits

(b) Such designated truck routes are shown on the map on file in the city clerk's office, marked Exhibit "A" and which is made a part hereof for all legal purposes as is set out in full herein, showing in heavy continuous lines the route or routes over which such transport vehicles may be driven or operated while within the corporate limits of the city. Said map is to be executed and attested by the mayor and city clerk and remain in the office of the city clerk as the official Truck Route Map for the city. An exact duplicate of said official Truck Route Map shall be prepared and kept in the office of the Assistant city manager and also signed by the mayor and attested to by the city clerk under date of this section as an exact duplicate original of the map maintained on file in the office of the city clerk.

(c) This article shall apply to every motor vehicle used for transporting hazardous materials. This article shall not apply to emergency vehicles or trucks in the service or maintenance departments of the city.

(d) Trucks or transporting vehicles carrying hazardous materials restricted to the streets designated as "truck routes" herein, may depart from such routes where it is necessary to load or unload merchandise at locations situated off of designated routes; provided, however, such vehicles shall follow the most direct truck route to the point nearest their ultimate destination and provided further that such vehicles shall not leave designated truck routes until they have reached a turning off point that can be described as the shortest distance practical to the ultimate destination of the vehicle which is consistent with a reasonable operation of the vehicle; provided, further, said vehicles may depart from the designated truck routes for the purpose of traveling to and from a duly designated truck terminal, provided that such vehicle proceeds by the most direct route that is practicable.

(1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-21-1)

Sec. 10.1202 Definitions

(a) Hazardous Material. Materials which can cause death or disabling injury on brief exposure, highly flammable or volatile liquids, gasses or solids, detonable materials, or highly self reactive materials, including, but not limited to:

(1) Explosives and explosively unstable materials.

(2) High level or moderately radioactive materials.

(3) Highly flammable gasses and materials which give off extremely flammable vapors, and other flammable liquids and solids.

(4) All compressed gasses, whether or not flammable or combustible.

(5) Gasoline and other liquid fuels.

(6) Extremely toxic materials which are so poisonous that no bodily exposure should occur, such as parathion and hydrogen cyanide, as well as highly toxic materials which are likely to cause some injury or illness but not death from a moderate exposure.

(7) Materials which are extremely corrosive to living tissue, such as bromine, which can injure almost instantaneously, or hydrofluoric acid which can strike through the skin to the tissues beneath and cause deep, slow-healing burns. Also included are materials that could cause severe eye injury, or destruction of tissue, particularly the eyes, if not removed from the body in a very short time.

(b) Transporting Vehicles. As the term is used in the article shall mean all vehicles and appurtenances thereto used for the transportation of hazardous materials in commercial quantities, except that those vehicles which are equipped for the use of liquefied petroleum gas as a fuel system for the vehicle itself shall not be subject to the provisions of this article insofar as liquefied petroleum gas is carried on such vehicle for fuel for such vehicle.

(c) Designated Truck Terminal. An area for trans-shipment of merchandise and service and maintenance of trucks.

(d) Commercial Quantity. Any quantity of material transported by a vehicle not intended for the vehicle's consumption and/or such quantity is intended for resale or is being transported for hire.


Sec. 10.1203 Miscellaneous Provisions

(a) Any retail delivery of hazardous materials to local bulk facilities or users of such products located off the designated routes as shown on the map located at the end of this section will be permitted and authorized provided that the transporting vehicle uses the designated routes to the point nearest the location of such using customer and the transporting vehicle shall be driven from the specified route along the most practical and direct route to the location of the customer and the return of such transporting vehicle shall be along the most direct and practical route back to the designated routes as established in this article.

(b) No transporting vehicle containing hazardous materials shall be parked or stored on the streets, alleys, public thoroughfares, or at any other point within the corporate limits of the city except upon premises owned or leased by the owner of such transporting vehicle and approved as a permanent commercial material location as provided by the Fire Prevention Code of the city; provided, however, that such vehicle may be parked at the point where the commodity is to be delivered and such delivery shall be made without delay. In no event shall such transporting vehicle be parked for the purpose of unloading or delivery of the hazardous materials for a longer period of time than one hour, unless the express permission of the chief of the Fire Department is first obtained.

(c) No hazardous materials shall be transferred from one transporting vehicle to another transporting vehicle on any street, alley, public thoroughfare, or at any other point in the city other than on the premises on which permanent storage facilities are located; except, that in case of any emergency, such transfer may be made under the supervision of the chief of the Fire Department.

(d) Any such vehicles may be driven off the designated routes to a public garage or repair shop when reasonably necessary for the maintenance and repair of such vehicle;

provided, however, that this provision shall never be construed as authorizing the repair of vehicles in areas otherwise prohibited by the provisions of this code, or by state law.

(e) Any person operating any of the aforesaid vehicles upon any street or roadway which is not designated a truck route as provided for hereinabove shall have in his possession for the inspection of police officer his log book or evidence of his destination and point of origin to justify the presence of said vehicle on a street or roadway other than a designated truck route.

(f) The City of San Angelo will request and the Highway Department District Engineer shall erect appropriate signs and markings advising operators of the above named vehicles of the truck routes established herein. Whenever any street or roadway designated as a truck route is under repair or otherwise temporarily out of use, the city manager and Highway Department District Engineer shall be authorized to designate alternate truck routes.


ARTICLE 10.1000 PARKING RESTRICTED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS*

Sec. 10.1001 Definitions

Commercial Vehicle. Every vehicle, including motor vehicles and trailers, designed, maintained or used primarily for the nonrecreational transportation of property and/or people and the gross weight. of which exceeds three and one-half (3-1/2) tons. This definition shall never be construed to include motor vehicles commonly known as "pickup trucks".

Trailer. Every vehicle, designed or used to carry its load wholly on its own structure and for being drawn by a motor vehicle.

Semi-Trailer. Every vehicle designed for carrying persons or property and for being drawn by a motor vehicle and so constructed that some or part of its weight or load rests upon or is carried by another vehicle.

Pole Trailer. Every vehicle, not a trailer or semi-trailer (as defined above) designed to be drawn by another vehicle and attached to the towing vehicle by means of a reach or pole, or by being boomed or otherwise secured to the towing vehicle and ordinarily used for transporting long or irregularly shaped loads such as poles, pipe or structural members capable generally of sustaining themselves as beams between the supporting connections.

Truck Tractor. Every motor vehicle designed and used primarily for drawing other vehicles and not so constructed as to carry a load other than part of the weight of the vehicle and load so drawn.

Residential District.

(1) Any lot or tract of land zoned to permit or actually used for residential purposes;

(2) Any area within the city zoned for use as or actually used for residential purposes.

Recreational Vehicle. Every motor vehicle, trailer or semi-trailer primarily designed and used as a temporary living quarters for recreational, camping or travel use; including motor homes, truck camper, travel trailer and camping trailer.


Sec. 10.1002 Parking Prohibited

It shall be unlawful for any person to park a commercial vehicle, trailer, semi-trailer, pole trailer, truck tractor or recreational vehicle on a street or lot in a residential district or on a street bordering a residential district. (1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-2)

http://z2codes.franklinlegal.net/franklin/DocViewer.jsp?docid=102&z2collection=sanangelo&showInToc=false

Sec. 10.1003 Penalty

Any person violating the provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall he fined in accordance with the general penalty provision found in Section 1.106 of this code. (1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-3)

Sec. 10.1004 Presumption

The presence of any of the vehicles aforementioned in a prohibited area shall be prima facie evidence that such vehicle is illegally parked and that same is illegally parked by the owner of such vehicle or with the permission and consent of such owner. (1959 Code of Ordinances, Sec. 10-19-4)

Sec. 10.1005 Exceptions

The prohibitions of this article shall not apply to:

(1) Trucks and trailers designed and used for transporting furniture and household goods while in the process of loading or unloading said items;

(2) Other trailers or commercial vehicles while in the process of loading or unloading;

(3) Mobile homes (as defined elsewhere within this code) provided that their right to occupy the location appears affirmatively from other statutes or ordinances;

(4) Trailers and semi-trailers used for recreational or home owner utility purposes and recreational vehicles (units hereinbelow) parked as follows:

(A) Inside parking, or

(B) Outside parking in a side yard not adjacent to and parallel to a street so long as the unit is set back from the property line at least five feet (5'), or

(C) Outside parking in the rear yard so long as the unit meets the setback requirements of an accessory building, as established elsewhere within this code, or


(D) Outside parking in the front yard or a side yard adjacent to and parallel to a street so long as:

http://z2codes.franklinlegal.net/franklin/DocViewer.jsp?docid=7&z2collection=sanangelo#JD_1.106

(i) Space is not available or there is no reasonable access to either the side yard not adjacent to and parallel to a street or rear yard; a corner lot is always deemed to have reasonable access to the rear yard;

(ii) Inside parking is not possible;

(iii) The unit is parked perpendicular to the street curb or street edge, or parallel on an improved surface semi-circular drive;

(iv) No part of the unit extends over a public sidewalk; and

(v) Providing the body of the unit (exclusive of tongue) is at least ten feet (10') from the face of the curb or, should there be no curb, ten feet (10') from the end of the street pavement.

(E) Parking is permitted in a residential district, as provided above, only if the unit is:

(i) Not used for permanent dwelling purposes (unless said right appears affirmatively from other statutes or ordinances) but may be used temporarily as guest quarters for a period not to exceed more than fourteen (14) days in any six (6) month period; and

(ii) Not connected to water lines or sewer lines (unless said right appears affirmatively from other statutes or ordinances) for a period of time exceeding fourteen (14) days in any six (6) month period.

(Ordinance adopted 8/3/04)

(F) Notwithstanding the above, a unit may be parked anywhere on the premises during active loading or unloading and the temporary use of electricity or water line hookup is permissible when necessary to prepare a recreational vehicle for use

(G) Any vehicle parked for a period of less than two (2) hours while the person parking same is consuming a meal.


ZONING ORDINANCE: CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 412. Home Occupations

In order to provide peace, quiet and domestic tranquillity within all residential neighborhoods within the City and in order to help all residents gain freedom from excessive noise, excessive traffic, nuisance, fire hazards and other possible side effects of commercial uses being conducted in residential areas, the following standards shall apply to all home occupations.

A. Criteria

1. No person, other than members of the family who reside in the dwelling where a home occupation occurs, may engage in such occupation, profession, domestic craft, instructional or economic enterprise.

2. The area utilized for the home occupation shall not exceed 25% of the gross floor area of the principal building where the home occupation occurs.

3. In no way shall the appearance of the structure be altered or the occupation be conducted in a manner which would cause the premises to differ from its residential character either by the use of colors, materials, construction, lighting or the emissions of sounds, noise or vibrations. A home occupation shall produce no offensive noise, dust, odors or heat. A home occupation shall be completely contained within the principal building. Any noise, vibration, smoke, electrical interference, dust, odors, heat or visual or audio interference detectable beyond the property lines or beyond the walls of the dwelling unit, if the unit is part of a multi-family structure, shall constitute a violation of the terms of this Section.

4. No detached accessory building may be used in conjunction with a home occupation.

5. All material, equipment, and/or supplies used in conjunction with a home occupation shall be completely enclosed with no exterior storage, temporary or permanent, allowed.

6. No stock, goods, wares or merchandise shall be sold on the premises other than that which is prepared or produced upon the premises. Direct sales on the premises of other merchandise is allowed by prior individualized invitation.

7. Signage for home occupations shall be limited to one non-illuminated sign with a maximum area of two square feet.

8. Delivery and pickup of materials to and from the home occupation shall not exceed two trips per week by a commercial vehicle. A "commercial vehicle" is that which is defined in Section 10.1001 of the City's Code of Ordinances.

http://z2codes.franklinlegal.net/franklin/DocViewer.jsp?docid=92&z2collection=sanangelo#JD_10.1001

City of San Angelo

Memo



From: Kevin Boyd, Planner

Subject: Mobile Home Permit 40, a request for temporary placement of a mobile home, not to exceed 1 year, during construction of a permanent home on the same 3 acre site in a Ranch & Estate (R&E) zoning district, on the following property:

Location: 1105 West 48th Street, located approximately 320 feet east of

the intersection of Lake Drive and West 48 Street; more specifically occupying the Chandler Subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 2, in northwest San Angelo.

Purpose: To allow a recreational vehicle to be placed on the subject

property, during the construction of a home on the same site.

Contacts: Kenneth A. Rocksuold, Owner (520) 241-9550 Kevin Boyd, Planner (325) 657-4210

Caption: Consideration of request for temporary placement of a mobile

home, not to exceed one year, during construction of a permanent home on the same 3 acre site. 1105 West 48th Street, located approximately 320 feet east of the intersection of Lake Drive and West 48 Street; more specifically occupying the Chandler Subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 2, in northwest San Angelo.


(1) Approve a Mobile Home Permit allowing a mobile home on the subject property, as requested: or

(2) Approve a Mobile Home Permit allowing a mobile home on the subject property, subject to conditions believed necessary and appropriate to mitigate any adverse effects of such use; or

(3) Deny the requested Mobile Home Permit allowing a mobile home all together.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the temporary placement of a mobile home on the subject to one condition.


General Information

Existing Zoning: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Existing Land Use: Vacant, open space Surrounding Zoning/Land Use: North: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Residential dwellings West: Ranch & Estate (R&E)

and Light Manufacturing (ML)

Open space and vacant commercial building

South: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Storage yard East: Ranch & Estate (R&E) Residential dwellings

Thoroughfares/Streets: West 48th Street is classified as a ‘local

street’ designed to carry light neighborhood traffic at low speeds.

Zoning History: As far back as 1949, this area has been

annexed into the city. In 1949, the property was zoned Ranch &

Estate (R&E), which is an equivalent to the current zoning.

Applicable Regulations: Article 12.500 Section 15.504, “Temporary

Mobile Home Installation.” A mobile home may be placed temporarily on a site during the construction of a home.

Development Standards: Section 303.A, “R&E (Ranch & Estate)

District.” The intent of R&E is to provide opportunities for development of low

density, detached single-family residences on lots of at least one acre in a suburban or rural setting.

Vision Plan Map: Commercial Related Comp Plan Excerpt(s): The intent of neighborhood is to reflect the

quality of life of its community by defining each neighborhood individually within the city. The subject property is defined as “Ranch & Estate.”

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: The amount of traffic generated from the proposed use will be minimum. West 48 Street is able to accommodate the increased traffic generated by the site.

Parking Requirements: 2 spaces, which include paved access to

the street. Parking Provided: No parking currently exists on the site. Related Specific Use Standards: Section 12.501, Zoning Ordinance As used in this article, the term "mobile

home" shall be interpreted to mean include "manufactured homes", or this case, recreational vehicles (RVs).

Section 12.502, Zoning Ordinance All mobile homes (including manufactured

homes), whether located in mobile home parks or subdivisions, or on private lots, which have been in place for a period greater than one hundred twenty (120) days, shall be tied down and anchored in accordance with state standards.

Section 12.503 Skirting, Zoning Ordinance All mobile homes, whether located in

mobile home parks or subdivisions, or private lots, which have been in place for a period greater than one hundred twenty (120) days, shall be skirted in accordance with the official code of the city.

Notification Required?: Yes Notifications Sent: 10


Analysis:

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. On February 2013, the proponent made a request to temporarily place a recreational vehicle on the subject property, while his house is under construction. In normal circumstances within the city, placement of mobile homes – on a permanent basis – is limited to Manufactured Housing Parks (MHP) or Manufactured Housing Subdivisions (MHS) districts and various locations in the city where it is allowed only by use of a special permit. This temporary request is an alternative that is intended to provide temporary living quarters for the property owner, while construction of the primary structure is underway. It is important to note that once the year duration has elapsed, the use must no longer be a place of residence (Article 12.500, City Ordinances). The temporary permit procedure to allow for placement of a mobile home, in order to construct an allowed residence, is typically prohibited in Ranch & Estate zoning or any residential district. The permit does not allow for a long-term variance, in fact, a period of one year is expressly outlined in the Ordinance. In sum, approval of this request offers a temporary reprieve – with the possibility of a one year extension. The property in question is currently a vacant empty lot zoned Ranch and Estate (R&E). While the Vision Plan calls for Commercial in the area, much of the surrounding area is characteristic of low density residential development. A lot roughly 250 feet to the west is occupied by a vacant commercial building. Tracts in the area are quite sizeable; many of the lots are greater than 2 acres. Staff is recommending approval of this request given the rural nature of the area, and the fact that the proposed use is low intensive and will not disturb the natural environment of the area. Staff affirms that R&E zoning districts are required to comply with applicable standards, and that allowing this temporary permit is consistent with the spirit of the Zoning Ordinance given the long term, permanent plans for the property. Although this request would provide a temporary living solution, a possible extension granted by City Council could allow the structure to exist on the lot for an additional year. Any period longer than this, staff believes, would be a contradiction to the spirit and intent of R&E zoning. Furthermore, it would provide an exception not available to others thus creating an inequitable situation, which is not what the Zoning Ordinance

seeks to encourage here. Given the location and intent of this request, staff recommends approval since the location is appropriate, is consistent with spirit of the Zoning Ordinance, and provides equality in the administering of regulations.

Proposed Conditions

1) The mobile home shall cease to be a dwelling unit on the property by

February 1, 2014 as requested by the applicant, unless an extension is approved by the City Council.


Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject

property; and Aerial photo, highlighting subject property; Excerpt of the favor/opposition notification map; and Applicant’s handwritten request for a temporary

permit.

Presentation: AJ Fawver, AICP, Interim Director of Development Services

Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CHAPTER 5 “BUSINESS AND COMMERCE”, ARTICLE 5.800 “HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX”, SECTION 5.805 “PURPOSE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX”, BY REPEALING SAID SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 5.805 ENTITLED, “USE OF REVENUE”, TO REMOVE THE MANDATED ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES ON A FIXED PERCENTAGE BASIS AND TO PROVIDE FOR ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES PERMITTED BY LAW AS CITY COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE WILL PROVIDE THE BEST VALUE IN APPLICATION OF HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE TO THE CITIZENS OF SAN ANGELO BY RESOLUTION FROM TIME TO TIME.

WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo levies and collects a hotel occupancy tax , the revenue of which is allocated on a fixed percentage basis for uses as mandated by the City of San Angelo Code of Ordinances, Chapter 5 “Business and Commerce”, Article 5.800 “Hotel Occupancy Tax”, Section 5.805 “Purpose and Distribution of Tax”; and, WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo is experiencing a changing economy and related positive hotel occupancy tax revenue collections and, WHEREAS, amending the Hotel Occupancy Tax Ordinance by removing the mandated allocations of revenue for uses on a fixed percentage basis, and providing that the City Council allocate revenue for uses pursuant to law as the City Council may determined from time to time, will provide the best value in application of hotel occupancy tax revenue to the citizens of City of San Angelo; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: Section 1.) THAT, Chapter 5, “Business and Commerce”, Article 5.800 “Hotel Occupancy

Tax” of the Code of Ordinances of the City of San Angelo, Section 5.805 “Purpose and Distribution of Tax”, is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Section 5.805 entitled “Use of Revenue” is hereby adopted to read as follows:

“Sec. 5.805 Use of Revenue

(a) The revenue derived from this Hotel Occupancy Tax shall only be used to promote tourism and the convention and hotel industry as limited by the Texas Tax Code, Chapter 351 “Municipal Hotel Occupancy Taxes” as now enacted or hereafter amended, in accordance with resolution of the city council..

(b) The city council by contract may delegate to a person, including another governmental entity or a private organization, the management or supervision of

programs and activities funded with revenue from the tax authorized by this article. The city council shall approve in writing in advance the annual budget of the person, governmental entity or private organization to which it delegates those functions and shall require the person, governmental entity or private organization to make periodic reports to the City Council at least quarterly listing the expenditures made by the person, governmental body or private organization with revenue from the tax provided by the city as authorized by law. The person, governmental entity or private organization must maintain revenue provided by the city from the tax in a separate account established for that purpose and may not commingle that revenue with any other money or maintain it in any other account. The approval by the city council of the annual budget of that person, governmental entity or private organization to whom it delegates those functions creates a fiduciary duty in that person, governmental entity or private organization with respect to the revenue provided by the city from the tax”.

(e) This article shall become effective on the date of its adoption, and shall apply to taxes due and received from and after , 2013

Section 2.) THAT, the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance

Section 3.) THAT, this Ordinance shall be effective on the date of its adoption.

INTRODUCED on the day of , 2013, and finally PASSED,

APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the day of , 2013.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

ATTEST: BY:

Alvin New, Mayor By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form: Michael Dane Lysia H. Bowling Assistant City Manager / CFO City Attorney

City of San Angelo



From: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO

Subject: Agenda Item for March 19, 2013, Council Meeting

Contact: Morgan Trainer, 653-6291

Caption: Regular Agenda

First Public Hearing and consideration of introducing an Ordinance amending the allocation method of Hotel Occupancy Tax and related matters AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CHAPTER 5 “BUSINESS AND COMMERCE”, ARTICLE 5.800 “HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX”, SECTION 5.805 “PURPOSE AND DISTRIBUTION OF TAX”, BY REPEALING SAID SECTION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 5.805 ENTITLED, “USE OF REVENUE”, TO REMOVE THE MANDATED ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES ON A FIXED PERCENTAGE BASIS AND TO PROVIDE FOR ALLOCATION OF REVENUE FOR USES PERMITTED BY LAW AS CITY COUNCIL MAY DETERMINE WILL PROVIDE THE BEST VALUE IN APPLICATION OF HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE TO THE CITIZENS OF SAN ANGELO BY RESOLUTION FROM TIME TO TIME;

Summary: City staff is requesting the City Council consider adopting an Ordinance adopting changes to the use of hotel occupancy tax dollars. Due to San Angelo’s changing economy and positive hotel occupancy tax experience, it is prudent to change existing methodology to provide the best value to the citizens of San Angelo.

Changes to the ordinance remove the requirement to allocate HOT funds on a percentage basis and allow the City Council allocate through an annual approval process. Staff will remind the Council of these percentages at the time allocations are decided and ensure Council allocates funding in accordance with State Law.

History: The City of San Angelo levied the hotel occupancy tax for the operation of

convention facilities, the promotion of tourism, and the improvement of the arts. Current contracts and ordinances allocate 48% of tax receipts to City of San Angelo Civic Events, 47% to the Convention & Visitors Bureau, and the remaining 5% to the San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council. The current tax rate is 7% for the City of San Angelo. The state levies an additional 6%. No change is proposed to the tax levy.

On February 5, 2013 City Council discussed changing the Hotel Occupancy Tax allocation process. On March 5, 2013 staff presented a draft contract with the Chamber of Commerce Convention & Visitors Bureau to revise the way Hotel Occupancy Tax dollars are disbursed to include clear communication, performance

benchmarks, demonstrate the value added, and allow the City Council to shape the entity’s activity.

Financial Impact: Due to recent positive economic experience, Hotel Occupancy Tax receipts

have increased. The proposed ordinance will allow City Council greater flexibility and will place greater accountability on recipients. As a result, any excess funds or surplus receipts will be made available for one-time or capital projects as allowed by Chapter 351 of the State Tax Code.

Related Vision Item (if applicable): Financial Vision

Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends introduction of the ordinance. Attachments: Article 5.800 of the Code of Ordinances Presentation: N/A Publication: N/A Reviewed by Director: Michael Dane, Assistant City Manager/CFO March 8, 2013 Approved by Legal: Pending







Tracy Ogle, COG, 944-9666

Caption: Consideration of nominating City Council members to serve as a representatives on the Concho Valley Council of Government General Assembly

Summary/History: The COG Bylaws provide voting membership eligibility for the City. The City should designate one member to the Executive Committee and two additional representatives to the General Assembly of the COG. The three representatives must be members of the Council and nominated by the Council. Due to the resignation of former Councilmember Adams, a City Council member should be nominated to fill the vacancy.

According to the COG Bylaws, Representation, each member city which is incorporated and has a population exceeding 50,000 shall have three (3) representatives who are qualified and elected as prescribed in Article III, A. To date, two City Council members are appointed.

Current appointees are as follows:

Executive Committee - Meetings: Second Wednesday, 7:00 PM, CVCOG facility

Mayor Alvin New (appointed 1/19/10)

General Assembly - Meetings: Annually in December

Fredd Adams (appointed 6/1/10) Charlotte Farmer (appointed 6/23/09)

Financial Impact: None Related Vision Item (if applicable): N/A Other Information/Recommendation: Staff recommends Council nominate a member or members to the COG board. Attachments: Letter from COG, Bylaws, and Member Listing Presentation: N/A

Publication: N/A

CONCHO VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS GENERAL ASSEMBLY REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 2012

COUNTIES

Member Government Representative(s) Status 1. Coke County Judge * Roy Blair (1) 2. Concho County Judge * Allen Amos (1) 3. Crockett County Judge *Fred Deaton (1) 4. Irion County Commissioner *John Nanny (1) 5. Kimble County Judge * Andrew Murr (1) 6. Mason County Judge * Jerry Bearden (1) 7. McCulloch County Judge * Danny Neal (1) 8. Menard County Judge * Richard Cordes (1) 9. Reagan County Judge * Larry Isom (1) 10. Schleicher County Judge * Charlie Bradley (1) 11. Sterling County Judge * Ralph Sides (1) 12. Sutton County Commissioner * Miguel Villanueva (1) 13. Tom Green County #1 Judge * Michael Brown (1) 14. Tom Green County #2 Commissioner Ralph Hoelscher (1) 15. Tom Green County #3 Commissioner Aubrey deCordova (1)

CITIES

16. Big Lake Council Member Cliff Miller (1) 17. Brady Council Member Brendan Weatherman (1) 18. Bronte Mayor Gerald Sandusky (1) 19. Eden Council Member Butch Williams (1) 20. Eldorado Mayor John Nikolauk (1) 21. Junction Mayor Larry Maddux (1) 22. Mason VACANT 23. Melvin VACANT 24. Menard Mayor Barbara Hooten (1) 25. Mertzon Mayor Art Uber (1) 26. Paint Rock Mayor Duane Schniers (1) 27. Robert Lee Mayor John R. Jacobs (1) 28. San Angelo #1 Councilmember Fredd B. Adams (1) 29. San Angelo #2 Councilmember Charlotte Farmer (1) 30. San Angelo #3 VACANT 31. Sonora Mayor Smith Neal (1) 32. Sterling City VACANT- notification sent

OTHER MEMBERS

33. San Angelo I.S.D. #1 * Lanny Layman (1) 34. San Angelo I.S.D. #2 Tim Archer (1) 35. State Legislator #1 * Drew Darby (2) 36. State Legislator #2 * Harvey Hilderbran (2) (1) Written designation on file (2) Appointed by Executive Committee * Also designated as Executive Committee Member

BYLAWS

Of the

CONCHO VALLEY

COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

San Angelo, Texas

As Amended: August 9, 1978

December 10, 1980 October 10, 1981

September 11, 1982 March 6, 1996

October 14, 2009

BYLAWS OF THE

CONCHO VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

PREAMBLE

We, the elected officials of local governments in the Concho Valley Region hereby join together in a

voluntary association to be known as the Concho Valley Council of Governments for the purpose of meeting at regular intervals to discuss and study community challenges of mutual interest and concern, and to develop policy and action recommendations for ratification and implementation by member local governments.

We realize that our individual and common destinies rest with the interdependent actions of the local governments which comprise our region.

This voluntary association which we have formed is a vehicle for closer cooperation and is not a new layer of government nor a super-government. As a voluntary organization of local governments, the members seek, by mutual agreement, solutions to mutual problems for mutual benefit.

Our goal is to retain and strengthen local home rule while combining our total resources for regional challenges beyond our individual capabilities.

We believe that the expansion of the concept of voluntary cooperation among local governments is an effective means for achieving this goal. We believe that cooperation must be fostered in two ways: By strengthening the abilities of local governments to meet individual local needs; and by developing a voluntary association (council) of local governments to meet the broader common needs.

ARTICLE I ORGANIZATION

There is hereby organized under Chapter 391, Local Government Code, (Formerly, Article 1011M,

Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes), a regional planning commission which shall be known as the Concho Valley Council of Governments, which shall be a voluntary association of governments.

ARTICLE II PURPOSE

The Concho Valley Council of Governments shall be a voluntary organization of local governments to

foster a cooperative effort in resolving problems, policies, and plans that are common and regional. The purpose of this organization is:

A. To join and cooperate to improve the health, safety, and general welfare of their residents;

B. To plan for the future development of communities, areas, and regions;

C. To improve the planning of transportation systems;

D. To help provide adequate street, utility, health, educational, recreational, and other essential facilities as the communities, areas, and regions grow;

E. To recognize the needs of agriculture, business, and industry;

F. To help provide healthful surroundings for family life in residential areas;

G. To help preserve historical and cultural values;

H. To help ensure the efficient and economical use of public funds is commensurate with the growth of the communities, areas, and regions.

I. To make studies and plans to guide the unified, far-reaching development of a region, eliminate duplication, and promote economy and efficiency in the coordinated development of a region.

ARTICLE III MEMBERSHIP

A. Requirements

1. The geographic area within which eligible members shall be located, in whole or in part, is

determined by reference to “Planning Regions for the State of Texas”, December, 1968. This delineation of Texas into twenty-one, now twenty-four, and multi-county planning regions was accomplished in response to a demonstrated need for improved communication and coordination among and between the planning and related efforts of the state, federal, and local governments. The Governor of Texas, by Executive Order, directed all state agencies to recognize this concept. The counties included in this region are Coke, Concho, Crockett, Irion, Kimble, Mason, McCulloch, Menard, Reagan, Schleicher, Sterling, Sutton and Tom Green. Any additions or deletions of counties in the Concho Valley State Planning Region which may be made from time to time by the Office of the Governor will accordingly affect the eligibility of such counties for membership in CVCOG.

2. Members must be geographically situated within a county listed in Article III, A.1. 3. All incorporated communities within a county shall become members simultaneously with

the county. The Executive Committee may deviate from this requirement when requested if in its opinion such a deviation would give priority to the condition that the incoming members who are units of general local government together represent 75% of the aggregate population of the county.

4. The membership by a county will continue the contiguous nature of the existing membership

and will not create a geographic void in the existing membership area. 5. Compliance by the member with the requirement in the Bylaws concerning financial

contributions of its members. 6. Voting membership shall be open to:

a. Member counties b. Member cities/towns c. Member school districts d. Member soil and water conservation districts e. Member River Authorities f. Member Water Districts g. Other special districts by permission of the Executive Committee

7. Upon approval of the Executive Committee, pending final approval of the General Assembly,

eligible governmental units, public utility companies, public and private companies within the area of the CVCOG may become associate members of the CVCOG by passage of an ordinance, minute order, resolution or other appropriate and legal action of the governing body of such units adopting Articles of Association and appropriating the funds required to pay their share of the dues of the CVCOG. In no event shall an associate member in the CVCOG be entitled to voting representation in the General Assembly or on the Executive Committee.

B. Representation Each member government shall be officially represented at the General Assembly as follows:

1. Each member county shall have one (1) representative who shall be an elected official, a member of the Commissioner’s Court, and elected by the Commissioner’s Court.

2. Each member county with a population exceeding 50,000 shall have two (2) additional representatives elected as prescribed in Article III, B.1.

3. Each member city which is incorporated shall have one (1) representative who shall be an

elected official, a member of the member city’s legislative body, and elected by that legislative body.

4. Each member city which is incorporated and has a population exceeding 25,000 shall have two (2) representatives who are qualified and elected as prescribed in Article III, A.

5. Each member city which is incorporated and has a population exceeding 50,000 shall have three (3) representatives who are qualified and elected as prescribed in Article III, A.

6. Each member independent school district with an enrollment of 10,000 or more shall have two (2) representatives who shall be elected members of the school board.

7. Each member independent school district with an enrollment of less than 10,000 shall have one (1) representative who shall be an elected member of the school board.

8. Member Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Member River Authorities and Water Districts, and other member special districts shall each have one (1) representative who is a member of its governing body and appointed by that body.

9. The population of any member governmental unit shall be determined by the preceding United States Census. After each United States Census membership shall be adjusted accordingly.

10. As used in these Bylaws, the term “elected official” means a Mayor and other members of the governing body of a city, town or village, a county judge, a county commissioner, a member of the Board of Trustees of a School District, a member of the Board of Supervisors of a Soil and Water Conservation District, or a member of the governing body of a special district other than a Soil and Water Conservation District.

11. As used in these Bylaws, the terms “cities”, “towns”, and “villages” shall mean those communities incorporated as such pursuant to the terms and requirements of the laws of the State of Texas.

12. Representatives shall serve during the term of office to which they have been elected as members of governing bodies of CVCOG member governmental units unless replaced sooner by the appointing authority.

13. In addition to the above named members, two members of the Texas Legislature whose districts include all or part of the Concho Valley Region shall be designated by the Executive Committee to serve as members of the General Assembly. Such members shall serve until a successor shall be appointed by the Executive Committee.

C. Admission and Withdrawal

1. Membership in the CVCOG shall be contingent upon execution of a resolution, ordinance, minute order or other appropriate legal action by the governing body of the member.

2. Withdrawal from membership may be accomplished upon execution of a resolution, ordinance, minute order or other appropriate legal action by the governing body of the member.

D. Dues

The CVCOG shall send each member before June 1st of each year a statement of dues for the coming year. Each member governmental unit shall pay to CVCOG an amount equal to one year’s dues on or before October 1st of each year. Members whose annual dues have not been paid as of October 31st of the dues’ year shall be given written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, as soon thereafter as practicable of this delinquency, which notice shall include a statement advising such member that it is delinquent and further advising that if such dues are not paid within thirty (30) days from the date of such notice, its membership and all privileges afforded thereby, including the right to vote, shall be terminated automatically as provided herein. Thereafter, upon the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of such notice, any delinquent member shall be notified by certified mail, return receipt requested, that its membership and all privileges afforded thereby have been terminated. A terminated member shall automatically be reinstated upon payment of all delinquent dues and the current dues, if any, then owing. The amount of annual dues shall be as follows:

1. Member counties and cities shall pay annual dues in the amount of $.05 per capita.

2. Each independent school district with an enrollment of over 10,000 shall pay annual dues

of $1,000.00.

3. All other independent school districts shall pay annual dues of $100.00.

4. All other voting members shall pay annual dues of $25.00.

5. Associate members shall pay annual dues of $200.00.

6. Annual dues by any member shall in no event be less than $25.00.

ARTICLE IV POLICY BODIES

The CVCOG shall have two policy bodies – a General Assembly and Executive Committee.

A. General Assembly

1. Quorum. A quorum of the General Assembly shall consist of a majority of the

total representatives of the member general purpose governments. Proxies shall be in writing; stating the name of the proxy, date of the meeting and signed by the person giving the proxy with this stipulation: proxies may only be held by those representing the membership of the person giving the proxy, i.e. a member who represents an entity must give his or her proxy to someone representing the same entity. The presiding officer at the meeting shall be the sole judge of the validity of the proxy and shall identify all proxy votes at the beginning of each meeting. Associate members shall not be included for quorum purposes.

2. Voting. Each representative of a member government and member of the Texas

Legislature designated by the Executive Committee shall have one (1) vote in the General Assembly. Proxies may vote at any meeting of the General Assembly for which they were duly appointed and accepted.

3. Meetings. The General Assembly is required to meet at least one time each fiscal year of

the CVCOG. The exact date of the meeting shall be determined by the Executive Committee. Election of officers shall be held at this meeting. The General Assembly shall also meet upon call of its president or the Executive Committee, or by petition of at least 10% of the membership of the General Assembly.

4. Responsibilities. The responsibilities of the General Assembly are:

a. To adopt and amend Bylaws; b. To review actions of the Executive Committee; c. To annually elect from representatives of general purpose

member governments a President, Vice-President, Secretary, and other officers as required.; and

d. To resolve questions arising under Article III. 5. Policy Recommendations. The General Assembly may recommend policy to the Executive Committee which shall be the governing body of the CVCOG.

B. Executive Committee 1. Membership a. Except when filling a vacancy, new Executive Committee members, after being duly selected, shall assume their position on the Executive Committee beginning January 1st following their appointment. b. Each county, within the Concho Valley region, shall have one representative who shall be the County Judge or a County Commissioner, appointed by the Commissioner’s Court. c. A member city with a population of 50,000 or more (determined by the preceding U.S. Census) shall have one (1) representative on the Executive Committee chosen from that unit’s governing body. d. A member independent school district with an enrollment exceeding 10,000 shall have one (1) representative on the Executive Committee chosen from that independent school district’s representatives to the General Assembly. e. Two members of the Texas Legislature chosen by the other members of the Executive Committee from among the legislators whose districts include all or a portion of the Concho Valley Region shall be voting members of the Committee. Such members shall serve until a successor shall be appointed. 2. Officers. a. The officers of the Executive Committee shall be Chair, Vice-Chair and Secretary. The officers shall be elected annually by the Executive Committee. b. Should a vacancy occur in the office of the Chair, the Vice-Chair shall become Chair for the balance of the unexpired term. Should a vacancy occur in the office of Vice-Chair, the Secretary shall become Vice-Chair for the balance of the unexpired term. Should a vacancy occur in the office of the Secretary, the Executive Committee shall by simple majority of the members present, elect a new Secretary to serve the balance of the unexpired term. 3. Quorum. A quorum of the Executive Committee shall consist of a majority of the total members of the Executive Committee in good standing. Proxies shall be in writing; stating the name of the proxy, date of the meeting and signed by the person giving the proxy with this

stipulation: proxies may only be held by fellow Executive Committee members in good standing. The presiding officer at the meeting shall be the sole judge of the validity of the proxy and shall identify all proxy votes at the beginning of each meeting. Proxies do not count for purposes of a quorum. 4. Vacancies. Should any member of the Executive Committee miss three consecutive regular meetings of such Committee without reason satisfactory to the Executive Committee, then the Executive Committee may declare the post vacated. When a vacancy occurs on the Executive Committee by reason or removal, resignation, death, withdrawal from public office, or any other reason, the remaining members of the Executive Committee shall appoint an eligible replacement until the appropriate appointing authority designates a new member. 5. Voting. Voting on routine matters in the Executive Committee requires a simple majority of those members present and voting. Proxies may vote at any meeting of the Executive Committee for which they were duly appointed and accepted. 6. Meetings. The Executive Committee shall meet at least monthly or on call of its Chairman, or at the direction of the General Assembly, or upon call of at least 10% of the voting membership of the Executive Committee. 7. Responsibilities. The responsibilities of the Executive Committee are: a. To adopt CVCOG budget and membership fee schedules;

b. To initiate, advise and aid in the establishment of cooperative arrangements, among local governments in the region; c. To propose, initiate, or approve any study, policy discussion, plan, or other CVCOG policy matters; d. To resolve questions arising under Article IV.B.1. e. To make recommendations to any local governments or other appropriate agencies or entities; f. To propose amendments to intergovernmental agreements for ratification of members; g. To designate an Applications Review Committee pursuant to Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966, and relevant Executive Orders, in accordance with the guidelines established by the Office of Management and Budget. h. To nominate a slate of officers to the General Assembly for approval and election; i. To appoint, fix salary of, and remove Executive Director; j. To be responsible for prescribing adequate controls for the investment, receipts, disbursement, and accounting for all CVCOG funds. k. To review CVCOG’s investment policy annually.

l. To provide for an independent audit annually, with the auditor selected pursuant to a Request for Proposals (RFP) to be released at least every five (5) years. The maximum number of consecutive years that an auditor may provide services shall be five (5). m. To provide an opportunity for the state and federal governments and other agencies having interest to participate in CVCOG activities; n. To seek and accept contributions and grants-in-aid; o. To provide for the duties, responsibilities and powers of officers and staff members; p. To execute, approve execution, ratify, confirm, or authorize the execution of any contract or any amendment of any contract in its own right or by and through the Executive Director until such time as the Executive Committee shall by resolution terminate such power; q. To provide that the certification of the Executive Director to the termination or non-termination of any power to contract, granted in these Bylaws, shall be conclusive of the same.

ARTICLE V

STAFF

The CVCOG shall have staff as provided for by the policy bodies. The Executive Committee shall have authority to appoint and remove the Executive Director and may authorize such other staff positions deemed necessary to carry out the functions of the CVCOG. The Executive Director shall be responsible for coordinating all staff and consultant services provided for to the CVCOG, preparing and administering the Annual work program and budget, employing, retaining, and removing all other personnel as may be necessary, performing all other duties delegated to him by the Executive Committee, including but not limited to the power to execute contracts as hereinafter specified. When time is of the essence, as determined by the Executive Director, said Executive Director shall have the power to execute any and all proper contracts, agreements or amendments of the same, and said contract, agreement, or amendment of the same shall be valid, binding and in full force and effect until such time as the Executive Committee shall by resolution reject it. When time is not of the essence, as determined by the Executive Director, each contract, agreement and/or amendment of the same shall be specifically approved by the Executive Committee by Resolution attached to the same, before the same shall be binding and in full force and effect. The certificate of the Executive Director that time is of the essence and that his contractual powers have not been terminated shall be conclusive of the same. The Executive Committee may require a fidelity bond, or other appropriate insurance of fidelity coverage in such amounts as seem prudent, on designated members of the Executive Committee and staff. The premiums for such bonds or insurance shall be paid by the CVCOG.

ARTICLE VI

FINANCE A. Budget The annual budget may be prepared in a manner that involves the splitting of the budget into a core budget and a special projects budget. The core budget will be the basic program budget, the benefits of which are received by all members. The special projects budget will include items of special interest and benefit to some of the members, but not necessarily all of them. The special projects budget will be supported by special contributions from those governments which directly benefit from the special project. B. Authorization to Sign Checks Checks will be signed by the persons to be designated by the Executive Committee. The Executive Director will certify that the item or the items for which the check is issued are payable and where appropriate will allocate charges to a specific project. C. Contributed Services Financial contributions to the CVCOG may take the form of contributed services, the cash equivalent of which can be readily determined.

ARTICLE VII

CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT The solicitation and consideration of citizen viewpoints shall be achieved through the mechanism of citizen advisory committees which shall be designated by and serve at the pleasure of the General Assembly and/or the Executive Committee.

ARTICLE VIII AMENDMENTS These Bylaws may be amended (repealed) or added to at regular or special meetings of the General Assembly, provided that ten (10) days in advance of the meeting a written notice shall have been sent to each representative, which notice shall state the amendments or changes which are proposed to be made in such Bylaws. Proposed amendments shall be considered to have passed if two-thirds of the participating representatives vote in the affirmative.

******

Adopted October 7, 1967 Amended August 9, 1978 December 10, 1980 October 10, 1981 September 11, 1982 March 6, 1996 October 14, 2009

Date post:	14-Jan-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	city-of-san-angelo-texas
View:	1,435 times
Download:	0 times