Date post: | 05-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | langat-justice |
View: | 234 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 34
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
1/34
IMPACT OF OUTSOURCING ON ORGANIZATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
A CASE STUDY OF MATER HOSPITAL, NAIROBI.
BY
KIPTOO MARITIM BERNARD
REG. NO: BBM/2609/11
RESEARCH PROPOSAL SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF
THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
OF THE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND
ECONOMICS
MOI UNIVERSITY
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
2/34
DECEMBER, 2011
DECLARATION
I declare that this is my original work and to the best of my knowledge, has not been submitted to
any other institution or University for the purpose of examination.
Signature .. Date_
KIPTOO MARITIM BERNARD (BBM/2609/11)
The project proposal has been submitted for examination with approval as University supervisor.
Signature .. Date_
WELDON NGENO
LECTURER
MOI UNIVERSITY
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
3/34
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to all organizations which perceive outsourcing as one of their strategies
that will lead to improvement in the organizational performance. I hope this research will inspire
the Government, planners, Outsourcers and implementers of outsourcing to facilitate the dream of
Kenya becoming an outsourcing hub by the year 2030
ABSTRACT
The aim of this paper is to assess the effects of outsourcing on performance of organizations.
Outsourcing is a strategic use of outside resources to perform activities that are usually handled by
internal staff and resources. By using a well managed outsourcing agreement, can gain in
markets that would otherwise have been uneconomical. This study was designed to explore the
impact outsourcing has on organizational performance. The results show that organizations
benefits from outsourcing strategies if they identify their outsourcers wisely.
The target population for the study was 60 employees. The questions tried to find out the extent to which
outsourcing led to financial performance improvement, the impact did outsourcing revenue cycle
functions have on the hospital employees, extent has outsourcing improved patient service and
satisfaction and extent has outsourcing benefited the wider community.
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
4/34
The instruments for data collection were questionnaires and interview schedule. The questionnaire was
administered to the employees. This was a useful tool that enabled the researcher to receive responses on
same questions from many respondents. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize data into
frequencies and percentages. The data findings revealed that outsourcing has an impact on the
performance of organizations.
Table of Contents
1.1 Back ground to the problem...........................................................................................................1
1.2 Mater hospital.................................................................................................................................2
1.3 Statement of the problem................................................................................................................3
1.4 Research Questions.........................................................................................................................4
1.5 Significance of the Study................................................................................................................5
1.6 Scope...............................................................................................................................................6
2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................2
2.2 Determinants of outsourcing..........................................................................................................3
2.3 Types of outsourcing......................................................................................................................4
2.3.1 Total Outsourcing........................................................................................................................5
2.3.2 Multiple suppliers outsourcing....................................................................................................6
2.3.3 Joint venture/strategic alliance outsourcing................................................................................2
2.3.4 In sourcing...................................................................................................................................3
2.3 Theories of outsourcing..................................................................................................................4
2.3.1 Transaction cost theory................................................................................................................5
2.3.2 The Agency Theory.....................................................................................................................6
2.3.3 Resource-based theory.................................................................................................................1
2.3.4 Resource-dependent theory.........................................................................................................2
2.3.5 Game theory.................................................................................................................................3
3.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................4
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
5/34
3.1 Research Design.............................................................................................................................5
3.2 Target Population............................................................................................................................6
3.3 Description of the Sample and Sampling Procedures....................................................................1
3.4 Description of Data Collection Procedures....................................................................................2
3.4.1 Questionnaire..............................................................................................................................3
3.5 Description of Data Analysis Procedures......................................................................................4
4.1. Introduction....................................................................................................................................5
4.2 Presentation of finding....................................................................................................................6
4.2.1 Respondents Background Information......................................................................................1
4.2.2. Opinion of employees on the decision to outsource..................................................................2
4.2.3 The extent to which outsourcing has lead to improved financial performance..........................3
4.2.4 The impact outsourcing revenue cycle functions had on the hospital employees......................4
4.2.5 Employees comment on the reaction of the staff union on the outsourcing decision................5
4.2.6 The extent to which outsourcing has improved patient service and satisfaction.......................6
4.2.7 Comments on the overall perception of the patients towards the service delivery
of the hospital...............................................................................................................................1
4.3 The extent to which outsourcing has benefited the wider community..........................................4
4.3.1 How does the community in general perceive the Hospitals decision to outsource?.................5
5.0 Summary, conclusions and recommendation.................................................................................6
5.1 Summary.........................................................................................................................................6
5.2 Conclusions.....................................................................................................................................6
5.3 Recommendations...........................................................................................................................6
5.4 Suggestions for Further Studies......................................................................................................6
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
6/34
Table of Figures and tables
Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of value from outsourcing.....................................................6
Table 1: Distribution of the target population......................................................................................6
Table 2: The sampling matrix ..............................................................................................................6
Table 3: Employees Gender ................................................................................................................6
Table 4: Service in years.......................................................................................................................6Table 5: Management level..................................................................................................................6
Table 6: Department of the respondent ...............................................................................................6
Table 7: presents a summary of what employees felt were the reason towards outsourcing ...... ...6
Table 8: Effects of outsourcing on performance.................................................................................6
Table 9: Impact of Outsourcing to employees.....................................................................................6
Table 10: Impact of Outsourcing to patients........................................................................................6
References ...........................................................................................................................................6
Appendices ...........................................................................................................................................6
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
7/34
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Back ground to the problem
In todays world of ever increasing competition, organizations are forced to look for new ways to
generate value. The world has embraced the phenomenon of outsourcing and companies have
adopted its principles to help them expand into other markets (Bender, 1999). Strategic
management of outsourcing is perhaps the most powerful tool in management, and outsourcing of
innovation is its frontier (Quinn, 2000)
Outsourcing is getting into an agreement with other Companies or persons to do a specific job or
function (Ella Venus, 2009). It is an arrangement in which one company provides services for
another company that could also be or usually have been provided in-house. Outsourcing is a trend
that is becoming more common in information technology and other industries for services that
have usually been regarded as intrinsic to managing a business.
Outsourcing decisions involve decision making on the boundary of a firm (Barney, 1999).
According to the Transaction Cost Theory, the boundary of a firm is decided by the cost
effectiveness of the activity (Coase, 1937; Williamson, 1981).
Africas outsourcing industry is very young but continues to grow slowly and gradually begins to
attract global attention and consideration in key research papers, publications and business
meetings. In Kenya, Business Process Outsourcing is one of the six pillars of economic growth in
the 2030 vision. In 2007, the ICT Board was established with the mandate of making Kenya the
preferred destination for outsourcing in Africa, and a top-10 global ICT hub.
1.2 Mater hospital
The Mater Hospital Nairobi first opened its doors in 1962 as a 60 bed unit. Gradually over the
years the Hospital grew significant additions being a maternity extension in 1970, the
paramedical building in 1987, a consultants clinic and family life centre in 1988, additional
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
8/34
operating theatres, Accident and Emergency and ICU block in1994, a separate chapel in 1997, and
a School of Nursing in 2004.
Today the Hospital has 137 beds, a 9 bedded ICU/HDU, a Renal Dialysis Unit, four operating
theatres, a Cardiac Unit, a 24-hour A & E service, a School of Nursing and numerous outpatient
services including a very busy Comprehensive Care Clinic (CCC) for HIV/ AIDS clients.
1.3 Statement of the problem
The recent reports in the media of Moi referral hospitals (second largest referral hospital in
Kenya) ICU and theatre have been closed due to cash crisis (Daily nation of October 18 th 2011)
and KNH operations at the largest referral in east and central Africa (standard News paper of 30th
October 2011) were paralyzed by strike of its 4,000 staff demanding commuter allowance. Perhaps
the solutions to this problems experienced by the two largest referrals hospital in Kenya is
outsourcing. This has prompted me access the impact outsourcing decisions has on the
performance of the hospital.
The practice of charging external service providers with the task of performing in-house activities,
has attracted growing interest in recent years as managers consider whether it is in their best
interest to perform activities in-house or externally (Maltz and Ellram 2000)
Research on outsourcing has concentrated on particular support services, notably facilities
management, logistics and IT provision. Some conclude that true costs and benefits are difficult to
assess. Some evaluations of outsourcing, favorable (Sharpe, 1997) and unfavorable (Stein, 1997),
are founded on ideology and management fashion (Hendry, 1995; Alexander and Young,
1996).
1.4 Objectives of the study1.4.1 General objectives
Successful implementation of an outsourcing strategy has been credited with helping to cut costs
(Bowersox 1990; Greer, Youngblood and Gray 1999), increase capacity, improve capacity,
improve quality (Lau and Hurley 1997, Kotabe, Murray and Javulagi 1998), increase profitability
and productivity (Casale 1996; Sinderman 1995), improve financial performance (Crane, 1999),
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
9/34
lower innovation costs and risks (Quinn, 2000) and improve organizational competitiveness (Lever
1997; Steensma and Corley 2000; Sharpe 1997).
1.4.2Specific objectives
Specifically the study sought to;
2 To establish the extent to which outsourcing affects costs in mater hospital
3 To determine the relationship between quality and outsourcing in mater hospital.
1.5 Research Questions
The following research questions guided this study:-
1 To what extent has outsourcing led to financial performance improvement on the Hospital?
2 To what extent has outsourcing improved patient service and satisfaction?
3 To what extent has outsourcing benefited the wider community?
1.6Significance/ Important of the study of the Study
The study would have different implications to different stakeholders. The main stakeholders to
benefit from the study include: Hospital Management, Patients, government and Academicians
The study would enable the Hospital Management by providing an insight on the effects of
Business process outsourcing and its significance to the hospital; it will also be useful to the
patients in that the outcome will provide the way forward on the provision of medical facilities
which could not be currently available in the hospital.
The government will be able to spearhead the government in policymaking regarding regulatory
requirements of the Kenyan outsourcing firms and the study will form a basis upon which further
studies on business process of outsourcing strategies and its effects in an organization can be
carried out.
1.7 Scope
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
10/34
The scope of this study was limited to the assessment of the effects of outsourcing to the Mater
hospital. The study covered the organization entirely for effective results.
1.8 Limitation of the study
The numerous security guards in the hospital made collection of the data to be amajor hindrance. Access to the hospital was very difficult and even after accessing ,
most managers tried to shift the responsibility of completing questionnaires to other
employees.
To overcome the problem I established link with some employees of the hospital
which I used to contact management.
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
Outsourcing has increasingly become a vital tool for the implementation of business strategy in
many organizations. Competition continues to increase and organizations are being continuously
forced to find ways to improve business performance and to obtain competitive advantage.
Increasingly, organizations are looking beyond the traditional boundaries of the firm to obtain
performance improvement. The growing prevalence of outsourcing service providers is shaping the
development of competitive strategies as well. The Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)
phenomenon has grown as organizations have been transferring responsibility for entire functions
such as human resource management, finance and information services to service providers
sometimes referred to as unbundling (Hagel and Singer, 1999).
Most firms often operate with limited resources and capabilities. The firms must learn to make the
most with the limited resources and capabilities (Hamel and Prahalad, 1989). Outsourcing provides
a way for the managers to grow their firms by obtaining the needed resources from external
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
11/34
suppliers and/or partners (Quinn, 2000; McIvor, 2005). Instead of doing everything internally,
firms may opt to source the needed goods and/or services from outside.
The aims are usually concerned with better cost control, which assumes that in-house costs are
known precisely beforehand, although that is not always the case. In some cases the outsourcing is
concerned more with gaining access to technical expertise which may not be available in the
outsourcing organization. There may be an emphasis on time saving for some organizations (cost
control in terms of staff time costs). Increasingly, perhaps, many outsourcing relationships are
becoming partnerships as outsourcing becomes an accepted way of conducting business, and
relationships between those involved develop over time (Grover, Teng, & Cheon, 1998).
2.2 Determinants of outsourcing
Outsourcing and its productivity effects may be obtained by looking directly at the determinants of
outsourcing.
i. Wages
(Girma and Grg, 2004), who estimated the productivity effect of outsourcing in the chemical,
engineering, and electronic manufacturing industries in the United Kingdom, estimated the
determinants of outsourcing. Focusing on plant characteristics, they found that high wages were
positively related to outsourcing. As they argue, this could suggest that cost-savings are important
in the firms decision to outsource. It could also indicate, however, a specialization process by skill
intensive plants in which they are outsourcing their relatively low-skill intensive processes.
ii. Asset Specificity
In transaction cost theory, assets are durable resources that include sites, physical assets, and
human assets (Williamson, 1985). Asset specificity refers to the degree to which such resources are
specialized to an exchange. In this way, asset specificity can be viewed as an exchange attribute as
well as a resource property, one that explains the resources potential for affecting transaction
costs.
Transaction cost theory asserts that asset specificity is important in conjunction with bounded
rationality, opportunism, and uncertainty. When asset specificity increases, under these conditions
the redeploy ability of the assets decreases, and the contracting hazards (notably, the hazard of
opportunism) as well as the bilateral dependency (notably, the risk of hold-up) between the parties
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
12/34
involved in an exchange, increase (Williamson, 1985). Consequently, the likelihood of hierarchical
forms of transaction governance increases (Williamson, 1991).
Asset specificity can not only cause hold-ups, with their associated monitoring and contract
enforcement costs, but it also affects the transaction costs engendered by other exchange attributes,
such as uncertainty and frequency (Williamson 1975, 1985; David and Han 2004).
Indeed, Williamson asserts (Williamson, 1999) that much of the explanatory power of the
transaction cost perspective turns on transaction-specific assets. A precise understanding of the
concept of asset specificity is important in order to assess its role in a firms decision on how to
govern an activity (Carter and Hodgson, 2006).
iii. Firms specificity
Although firm specificity is often meant to denote resource among firms, so far researchers have
not agreed on a formal definition of the term. Different researchers emphasize different aspects,
such as the specificity of resources with respect to fields of application (Collis and Montgomery,
1997), specificity with respect to a firms needs (Chi, 1994)
A firms resources could still be firm-specific, even if the firm was not endowed with them, in the
sense that their potential to generate value would be greater for that firm than for another. Firm
specificity of activity-enabling resources is also often associated with the difficulties involved in
imitating and substituting this resource bundle (Rumelt, 1984), as well as with the value-enhancing
linkages (complementarities) among these resources and the firms overall resource position
(Conner, 1991).
Firm-specificity is one of the resource properties that define strategic assets (Amit and
Schoemaker, 1993).The greater a resources specificity to a firm, the greater its rent potential to
that firm, given favorable conditions of demand, public policy and competitor action. Firm-specific
resources are often associated with increased efficiency (Jacobides, 2004)
2.3 Types of outsourcing
Outsourcing is an important decision that has implications far beyond the improved financial
results most organizations hope to gain. Only hospitals that understand the real financial and
human costs and benefits can determine when it adds value. This can help a Hospital in determine
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
13/34
the levels of outsourcing it can accommodate in its services. There are basically four types of
outsourcing (Currie & Willcocks, 1998)
2.3.1 Total Outsourcing
Total outsourcing involves developing a partnership with a single supplier, with IT perceived as a
service or support function. The aim is usually to reduce IT costs, or eliminate a problem IT
function, but the outsourcing organization retains strategic control.
2.3.2 Multiple suppliers outsourcing
Multiple suppliers out sourcing is less concerned with partnerships as the aim is to foster
innovation and create competition between suppliers, although it is recognized that suppliers will
form alliances among themselves for bidding purposes.
2.3.3Joint venture/strategic alliance outsourcing
Joint venture/strategic alliance outsourcing is more concerned with development of new
knowledge for the client, and there is more emphasis on shared risks and rewards. Sometimes
various organizations will foster the creation of a supplier company to which they will outsource
work, but still have more control than they would do in a multiple supplier or total outsourcing
arrangement.
2.3.4 In sourcing
In sourcing, or keeping the IT department and services in-house, occurs when organizations view
IT as core to their business, or when they mistrust possible suppliers. A more recent type of
outsourcing is the ASP (application service provider) model, where organizations purchase
software use on an as and when basis (Kern, Kreijger, & Willcocks, 2002).
2.3.5 Theories of outsourcing
The increasing use of outsourcing arrangements, as well as the unfamiliar complexity of
outsourcing suggests the need to know more of how to effectively utilize this strategy.
Consequently, more information is needed to understand successful outsourcing and the problems
encountered in outsourcing activities and its impact on the overall organizational performance.
The capabilities of a firm must include control over or access to complementary assets and
activities that would enable them to innovate, and to profit from the innovations (Nelson, 1991).
The ability to control and make the most of critical capabilities whether or not they reside within
the firm is more important than the ownership of the capabilities (Gottfredson, Puryear and
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
14/34
Phillips, 2005). Outsourcing provides strategic options for the firms to address the challenges of
operating and growing given the limitations of their resources and capabilities (Gottfredson 2005).
2.3.5.1 The Agency Theory
Agency cost theory expands on one aspect of TCT, as it deals with the different perspectives of
risk that client and supplier have, and differentiates between outcome-based contracts, and
behavior-based contracts. If the client distrusts the supplier then the extent of monitoring required
will be greater for the client, than it would be if the client could wholly trust the supplier to deliver.
The client has two main choices: a contract which stipulates payment by results (an outcome-based
contract), or a contract that states the supplier should do certain things at stipulated times, or spend
a certain amount of time on certain functions. If one cannot trust a supplier to deliver a product
some months down the line, then it might pay to ensure that it looks as if they are doing something.
On the supplier side, a behavior-based contract at least allows them to claim that they did spend x
hours on this task, even if the outcome could not be achieved as originally intended.
Agency cost theory helps to distinguish the most productive and fairest method of minimizing risks
for both client and supplier. Agency theory addresses relationships in which one party (the
principal) delegates work to another (the agent) who performs the work according to a mutually
agreed contract. Both parties are self-interested with incongruent goals. This leads to two
problems: 1) ex-ante, before signing the contract: the problem of adverse selection and 2) ex-post,
after signing the contract: the problem of moral hazard.
Adverse selection arises pre-contractually because the agent possesses private or hidden
information about the real quality of his service and the principal is unable to find out that
information. This leads to information asymmetry and puts the principal in a disadvantaged
position since the principal is faced with a pool of bidders with often insufficient qualifications.
The principal cannot easily distinguish the bad cars or lemons from the good ones (Akerlof,
1970).
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
15/34
2.4 Conceptual frame work
Although outsourcing may prove beneficial in specific situations, hospitals need to consider the
true costs of outsourcing, which include the opportunity cost of outside contractors continually
tapping into the hospitals revenue stream rather than having the additional revenue flow back to
the hospital.
Before outsourcing revenue cycle functions, hospitals need to determine why they have not yet
accomplished their performance improvement objectives.
Does the organization lack access to qualified personnel?
Are internal processes, tools, and technology insufficient to handle revenue cycle activities
efficiently and effectively?
Is there insufficient capital to invest in needed resources?
What attempts have been made to address these issues?
What were the outcomes of these efforts?
Once the answers to these questions are clear, the unique capabilities, skills, and resources an
outsourcer must be able to provide to overcome existing barriers to success can be identified.
Hospitals should work closely with potential outside contractors to document and verify their skills
and capabilities and ensure they can demonstrate a consistent, long-term track record of success.
Hospitals may hope to achieve several objectives through outsourcing; financial performance
improvement is usually the chief among them. Increased employee performance, greater job
satisfaction, and improved workforce morale resulting from better training, more efficient work
processes, or enhanced technology that an outsourcer may provide are other common objectives.
Some hospitals hope that outsourcing revenue cycle activities will improve patient service or
satisfaction by reducing waiting times to receive care or expediting claims processing and
payment. Still others anticipate benefits to the broader community by boosting the margin
available to help fulfill the hospitals mission. Accomplishing all of these objectives, rather than
just one or two, should be the goal of any revenue cycle improvement effort.
To truly understand the real financial benefits and costs of outsourcing, hospitals need to carefully
evaluate the ways they expect outsourcing to drive financial performance improvement. Because
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
16/34
the revenue cycle affects so many stakeholders (patients, employees, and the community), it is
important not only to consider the objectives but also to evaluate the impact that outsourcing will
have on all of these constituencies.
Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of value from outsourcing
CHAPTER THREE
Outsourci
ng
Specialty Performance
Service Quality
Cost saving
Improved satisfaction
Savings on capital investments
Adaptability to the environment
Saving on Human resource
Benefits to the wider community
Service Quality
Cost saving
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
17/34
3.0 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter has research approach, designs, sample and sampling procedures, research
instruments, administration of research instruments/data collection and analysis procedures.
3.1 Research Design
In assessing the effects of outsourcing to the organizational performance of the Mater Hospital, the
researcher used descriptive research. This approach is appropriate to this study because the study
involves fact finding and enquiries of different kind to describe the state of the affairs (effects of
outsourcing) as they exist at the time of this study.
3.2 Target Population
In assessing the effects of outsourcing to the organizational performance of the Mater Hospital, the
researcher targeted a population size of 602 people who included senior Management, paramedic
staff, contracted staff, low come staff and senior management staff. The population of 602
consisted of the total number of employees from the fivedepartments of The Mater Hospital and
will be being distributed as follows:
Table 1: Distribution of the target population
DEPARTMENT POPULATION SIZE
Subordinate 253
Paramedic 211
Contracted 72
Low come 48
Senior Management 18
Total 602
3.3 Description of the Sample and Sampling Procedures
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
18/34
The selection of the actual sample size was done using Stratified Sampling. Simple Random
Sampling was then used to get the figures. Stratified random sampling which is one method of
Probability Sampling (Kombo and Tromp, 2006) was used to divide the staff population into
homogeneous subgroups and then took simple random sample in each subgroup.
Simple random sampling was then used taking 10% to ensure that the sample was representative in
proportion to their number in population. This is because for descriptive studies 10% of the
population is adequate for sampling (Gay, 1996). Simple random sampling ensured that each
individual employee had an equal chance of being selected and therefore avoided biases.
Below is tabulation of how the sample was derived.
Table 2: The sampling matrix
DEPARTMENT POPULATION SIZE SAMPLE SIZE
Subordinate 253 25
Paramedic 211 21
Contracted 72 7
Low come 48 5
Senior Management 18 2
Total 602 60
Using the organizational chart and list of staff members, the population was first stratified
according to departments and then determined the size of each department. Using proportionate
method, the researcher established the size of the subject of each department and by use of
purposive sampling method, picked subjects for each department. This sampling process enabled
the researcher to deal with the subject critical to the study.
3.4 Description of Data Collection Procedures
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
19/34
The study used primary data and secondary data. Primary data refers to the information a
researcher obtains from the field from the subjects in the sample while the secondary data refers to
information a researcher obtains from books, reports and other publications which had been
collected for other purposes (Kothari, 2003). These sources assisted the researcher in comparing
the two types of data for reliability.
According to (Mugenda and Mugenda ,2003) qualitative methods provide in depth explanations
while quantitative methods provide the hard data needed to meet required objectives.
3.4.1 Questionnaire
A questionnaire with structured and unstructured questions was used to collect data. According to
(Kothari ,2003), structured questions (closed ended) refer to questions which are accompanied by a
list of possible alternative answers from which respondents select the answer that best describes
their situation. Closed ended questions are easier to analyze and administer because of specific
alternative answers, however they are difficult to construct and responses are limited. Questions
were therefore standardized to ensure all respondents reply to same questions in a defined manner.
Open ended questions refer to questions which give respondents complete freedom of response.
They permit greater response though can encourage irrelevant response (Kothari, 2003). They were
used in some specific areas that require explanations. The questionnaires were delivered by hand to
each subject by the researcher who then instructed the subject on how to complete the
questionnaire and also make clarifications on issues that required to be clarified.
3.5Description of Data Analysis Procedures
(Kerlinger, 1973) describes data analysis as categorizing, ordering, manipulating and summarizing
data to obtain answers to research questions. He stresses that the purpose of analysis is to reduce
data to intelligible and interpretable form in order to study and test the relations of research
problems. The data obtained will be analyzed using data management software, Statistical Package
for Social Sciences (SPSS) for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data.
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
20/34
All questionnaires were adequately checked and verified for reliability. The information was
codified, entered into a spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS by the researcher. Exploratory
analysis was first performed to ensure that the output were free from errors. The data was then
analyzed using qualitative and quantitative techniques. This involves creating descriptive statistics
namely percentages, and measures of central tendency. The data was then presented using tables
and cross tabulations. Scalar types of questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics to
establish the level of perception to various attributes provided.
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF THE FINDINGS
4.1. Introduction
This chapter presents the research findings from employees of The Mater Hospital. The study
sought to find out the effects of outsourcing to organizational performance. Questionnaires were
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
21/34
administered to 60 employees in different departments. Only 53 employees returned the
questionnaires.
The findings are hereby presented in descriptive statistics. These findings are presented in five
sections. The first section gives background information of the respondents and the rest four are in
line with the four research questions. The main sections shall be as follows:
1) Respondents Background Information
2) The extent to which outsourcing has lead to improved financial performance
3) The extent to which outsourcing has improved patient service and satisfaction
4) The extent to which outsourcing has benefited the wider community
4.2 Presentation of finding
4.2.1 Respondents Background Information
Table 3: Employees Gender
Gender Frequency %
Male 29 54.7
Female 24 45.3
53 100
Out of the 60 questioners which were administered, a total of 53 employees participated in the
study among which 24 were female and 29 male. This was 88.3% of the sample size that had been
selected.
Table 4: Service in years
Service in Year Frequency %
0 - 5 22 41.5
6 - 10 17 32.1
11 -15 9 17
Over 15 5 9.4
Total 53 100
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
22/34
Of the total employees who participated 41.5% has served the Hospital for less than five years,
32.1% for six to ten years, 11% for eleven to fifteen years and 9.45 has served the Hospital for
over 15 years. These results indicate that very few employees stay in the Hospital for long.
Effective communication among the management and the employees could reduce the rate of staff
turnover. The management needs to rebuild trust with the employees this can be achieved through
support by the top management and providing incentives to employees who meet their expectations
(Jones, 1997; foster, 1999)
Table 5: Management level
Level in Management Frequency %
Management Level 2 3.77
Supervisory level 23 43.4
Subordinated staff 28 52.83
Total 53 100
52.83% of the employees who participated were subordinate staff, 43.4% were supervisory staff
and 3.77% were in the management level.
The subordinate staffs being the main participants in the exercise were the most affected in the
outsourcing decision of the hospital this was due to the fear that their jobs were at stake and risked
losing them to the outsourced company.
The individuals in the subordinate level were expected to manage the outsourcing relationship and
therefore required to have a complete understanding of the business goal, specific performance
criteria and their individual roles. This can be achieved through training and communication and
can help reduce resistance or resentment (Foster 1999)
Table 6: Department of the respondent
Department Frequency %
Subordinate 23 43.4
Paramedic 18 33.96
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
23/34
Contracted 6 11.32
Low come 4 7.55
Senior Management 2 3.77
Total 53 100
Part of the employees who returned their questionnaire 43.4%, 33.96 %, 11.32%, 7.55% and
3.77% were in the Subordinate, Paramedic, Contracted, Low come and Senior Management
departments respectively.
The research was carried out in all departments of the Hospital to ensure that opinion was obtained
from all levels because the decision of the Hospital to outsource affected all the employees
irrespective of the department in which they were placed.4.2.2. Opinion of employees on the decision to outsource
This sections findings shall be responding to the employees opinion on the driving force to the
decision to outsource. The first question in the questionnaire sought to find out employees overall
opinion towards the reasons of outsourcing as concerned cost savings, employee morale and skills,
insufficient capital resources, focus on core competences and improved delivery and reliability
Table 7: presents a summary of what employees felt were the reason towards outsourcing
Selected possible areas that led to outsourcing decision
Strongly
agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
disagree
% % % % % %
Financial performance was the driving force that lead
to Outsourcing
11.32 73.58 9.43 3.77 1.89 100
Hospital outsourced in order to increase employee
performance
7.55 58.49 3.77 18.87 11.32 100
Improving patient service / satisfaction was a driving
force to the outsourcing decision
32.08 49.06 7.55 9.43 1.89 100
Lack of qualified personnel to handle the outsourced
services led to the outsourcing decision
15.09 54.72 0.00 13.21 16.98 100
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
24/34
Insufficient capital to invest in the needed resources
was the cause of the outsourcing decision
58.49 35.85 5.66 0.00 0.00 100
Insufficient internal processes, tools and technology
led to the outsourcing of revenue cycle activities
67.92 24.53 1.89 3.77 1.89 100
Hospital outsourced in order to focus on its core
activities
73.58 22.64 3.77 0.00 0.00 100
Hospital outsourced in order to make capital funds
available for more profitable operations
45.28 39.62 5.66 1.89 7.55 100
Hospital outsourced in order to improve delivery and
reliability of its services
7.55 79.25 3.77 9.43 0.00 100
N = 58
Opinion on Financial performance as the driving force
11.32% of those studied strongly agreed with the reasons behind the outsourcing decision, while as
73.58% agreed that indeed financial performance was the driving force towards the outsourcing
decision. This resulted to 84.9% of the employees were positive that financial performance was the
driving force towards outsourcing.
The finding complement previous studies (Bowersox ,1999 ; Crane, 1999; and Quinn, 2000) and
proves that outsourcing is undertaken for purposes that have a large impact on the organizations
bottom line.
Opinion on outsourcing in order to increase employee performance
7.55% of those studied strongly agreed with the reasons behind the outsourcing decision, while as
58.49% agreed that the hospital outsourced in order to improve employee performance. This
resulted to 66.04% of the employees being positive though they felt they need to be more involved
than the position stands currently.
The effects of outsourcing on the employees morale and performance though 66.04% agreed to
the decision to outsource the Hospital need to inform the employees in every step of the
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
25/34
outsourcing decision and make them feel they have participated in the decisions to ensure they
perform well.
Other reasons that contributed to the outsourcing decision
From the employees studied it was clear that they felt that there existed other reasons which led to
the hospitals decision to outsource. These reasons were stipulated in the questioner as what the
participants felt were the other reason why the decision to outsource were undertaken.
1. Reduction of the number of staff in the payroll
2. Reduction in insurance costs
3. The possibility of obtaining cheaper labor from the market
4.2.3 The extent to which outsourcing has lead to improved financial performance
Table 8: Effects of outsourcing on performance
Effects of outsourcing on performance
% % % %
Outsourcing opportunity match the organizational business needs 66.04 22.64 11.32 100
Outsourcing led to the Hospital reducing costs 81.13 15.10 3.77 100
Out sourcing led to improved cash flow in the organization 77.36 0.00 22.64 100
N = 53
From the employees studied 66.04% felt that the outsourcing opportunity matched the
organizational business needs, 22.64% felt otherwise while as 11.32% were not sure. The
employees studied, 81.13% felt that the outsourcing has led to reduction of costs by the hospital,
15.1% felt that there was no saving in cost as a result of the outsourcing decision and 3.77% were
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
26/34
not sure on whether there has been a cost reduction experienced by the hospital, and 22.64% were
not sure of any increased cash flow from the organization. From those studied it was evidence that
the Hospital conducts performance evaluation of the outsourced services on quarterly basis.
4.2.4 The impact outsourcing revenue cycle functions had on the hospital employees
Table 9: Impact of Outsourcing to employees
Effects of outsourcing on Employees
Yes No Not
sure
% % % %
Did outsourcing result to additional new skills from employees of
the outsourced Company
79.25 20.75 0 100
Did outsourcing bring about organizational change in practice and
culture
88.68 9.43 1.89 100
Did outsourcing boost the employees morale 54.72 16.98 28.30 100
Outsourcing enhanced the relationship between employees and the
management
37.74 52.83 9.43 100
Are employees more efficient as a result of outsourcing 71.70 18.87 9.43 100
Has out sourcing led to high staff turnover 24.53 69.81 22.64 100
N = 53
79.25% of the respondents agreed that the outsourcing by the Hospital has facilitate its employees
in acquiring new skills, 88.68% felt that the organizational culture and practice has changed as a
result of the outsourcing decision and 52.83% felt that the decision led to reduced relationship
among the employees and the management.
The Hospital management needs to step in and re build trust among the workers, reevaluate those
jobs and provide incentives to employees to make them understand that they are part of the process
and make them know they have a share on the improved bottom line of the Hospital. This will
enable them perform better.
4.2.5 Employees comment on the reaction of the staff union on the outsourcing decision
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
27/34
Employees studies concluded that the staff union participated in the decision to outsource thereby
ensuring that they were not victimized and that no one was sent home so as to create room for
employees of the outsourced company. They however felt that they need to be involved more in
those decisions which affect them directly.
4.2.6 The extent to which outsourcing has improved patient service and satisfaction
Table 10: Impact of Outsourcing to patients
Selected possible areas that led to outsourcing
decision
Strongly
agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree
% % % % % %
Patients are more satisfied by the services offered by
the Hospital than before
69.81 9.43 5.66 3.77 11.32 100
Are there fewer patients complain as a result of
outsourcing
77.36 13.21 9.43 0.00 0.00 100
As a result of the satisfaction derived employees
would prefer seeking medical attention from the
hospital
60.38 28.30 0.00 9.43 1.89 100
Patients always refer other patients to the Hospital
since they get more satisfied
92.46 3.77 3.77 0.00 0.00 100
N = 53
77.36% of the responded agreed that there were fewer patients complains, 92.46% said that
patients are more satisfied and refer other patients to the Hospital to receive services and 11.32%
disagreed that patients were more satisfied with the services that were offered by the hospital.
The results indicate that the decision to outsource has a greet impact in the way services are
provided
4.2.7 Comments on the overall perception of the patients towards the service delivery of the
hospital
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
28/34
In this question employees commented that they have been receiving commendation from patients
they serve and also relatives of those patients on their service in this they felt that the patients were
satisfied with the services delivered by the Hospital in general.
4.3 The extent to which outsourcing has benefited the wider community
4.3.1 How does the community in general perceive the Hospitals decision to outsource?
Employees studied commented that the community with the Hospital has fully benefited from the
outsourcing decision this was clearly expressed in cases where the community is contacted for
provision of care for the terminally ill patients especially those suffering from HIV & AIDS who
needs assurance and love during their last days and with the use of services from the community it
gives such patients comfort and the feeling of belongingness from the company they get from
those taking care of the yet the people are hired from the community and as a result jobs are
created.
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Summary, conclusions and recommendation
5.1 Summary
This research paper purposed to find out the effects of outsourcing to organizational performance
in The Mater Hospital. From the study it was quite evidence that outsourcing led to improved
performance to organizations depending on how the outsourcing is structured and the
competencies of the firm from which outsourcing has been contracted from.
It was indeed evident that the decision to outsource can lead to competitive advantages for
businesses and for outsourcing to be successful the decision needs to be an informed one. Good,
hard, detailed information in the hands of strong management can help avoid a costly step, one that
is not easily reversed. Ultimately, for outsourcing in any form to be successful, quick responsetimes to strategic opportunities and threats are essential. Effective management of the outsourcing
relationships is an organizational imperative.
The top reasons for undertaking outsourcing projects identified by the survey results were to
reduce costs, improve quality, improve delivery and reliability, gain access to materials only
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
29/34
available abroad, establish a presence in foreign market, use resources not available internally,
reduce the overall amount of specialized skills and knowledge needed for operations, make capital
funds available for more profitable operations, and focus on core competencies of the corporation.
These findings complement previous studies (Bowersox 1990; Crane 1999; and Quinn 2000) and
suggest that outsourcing is undertaken for purposes that have a large impact on the organizations
bottom line, although more tangential purposes such as strategy, profitability, and competitive
advantage may have been the rationale for the more direct reasons.
This study was guided by the following research questions:
1 To what extent has outsourcing led to financial performance improvement?
2 What impact did outsourcing revenue cycle functions have on the hospital employees?
3 To what extent has outsourcing improved patient service and satisfaction?
4 To what extent has outsourcing benefited the wider community?
The study employed descriptive research. It targeted all employees of the Mater Hospital. The
researched used Stratified Sampling and Simple Random Sampling to select a sample of 60. Only
53 employees returned the filled in questionnaire. To obtain information from the respondents the
researcher used questionnaires. Data were collected by the researcher and summarized into
frequencies, percentages and narrative reports.
5.2 Conclusions
Based on the findings, the following are the conclusions:
1) Based on the researchers knowledge of outsourcing, the respondents showed that The Mater
Hospital outsourcing decision was well informed, and has led to a significance change on how the
Hospital operates.
2) The respondents possessed concepts; perspectives and conviction that they need to be moreinvolved in the outsourcing decisions by the Hospital to ensure that they have all information to
enable them monitor the operations of the outsourced company.
3) The researcher clearly deduced from the responses that respondents knew that outsourcing has a
great impact to the Hospital performance and delivery of its services.
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
30/34
4) The Employees expressed their willingness to improve their relationship with the management
if they were more involved in decision making in those areas which touched on them and were
critical.
5.3 Recommendations
Based on the findings the researcher made the following recommendations:
1) The Mater Hospital should establish a department or centre to coordinate employees and to
collect their views on the operations of the Hospital.
2) The Hospital needed to invite tenders for the services currently being outsourced to be assured
that they are getting the best services at the lowest costs.
5.4 Suggestions for Further Studies
1) Similar research studies should be carried out in all organization to ensure that the true effects of
outsourcing are experienced.
2) A study need conducted to establish whether the outsourced companies are equipped with the
right skills and competencies to tackle the assigned activities
3) A study should be carried out to find out the extent to which the employees of the outsourced
company are utilized to attain the desired objectives.
4) A study should be carried out to establish the challenges that are facing the decision to
outsource some activities which are usually seen as key to the organization.
REFERENCES
1. Quinn, B.J. 2000. Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management
review 41 (14)
2. (Ella Venus 2009
3. Barney, J.B. 1999. How a firms capabilities affect boundery decisions. Sloan Management
review, (40: 3)
4. Coase R. H (1937). The nature of the form. Cited in: J Barney, W Ouchi (Eds). Organizational
economics san Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1986
5. Williamson, 1981).
6. 2030 vision. In 2007
7. Medical Device Daily February 28 2008).
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
31/34
8. (Maltz and Ellram 2000;)
9. (Lewis and Talalayevsky 2000)
10. ( Mahnke, Overby, and Vang 2005).
11. (Murphy and Poist 2000)
12. ( Knemeyer, Corsi, and Murphy 2003).
13.Sharpe, M. 1997. Outsourcing gains speed in outsourcing world. Journal of labour research
(Fall): 535 - 549
14.Bowers, D. J. 1990. The strategic benefits of logistics alliances. Harvard Business Review 68
(4): 6 45.
15.Greer, C. R., S. A. Youngblood and D. A. Gray. 1999. Human resource management
outsourcing: The make or buy decision. Academy management Executive 13(3): 85 96.
(Alexander and Young, 1996).
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Respondent: My name is Kiptoo Maritim Bernard, am a Bachelor of Business management
Student at the Moi University, Nairobi Sattetlite Campus. Am conducting my Academic research,
which is a partial fulfillment of the requirement of this course. The Mater Hospital has permitted
me to conduct this research. I will treat your opinions confidentially. You honesty is both critical
and paramount when you respond to the questionnaire.
Please tick() as appropriate.
Section A: Background Information
1. Gender of Respondent
2. Male Female
3. How long have your worked for this organization (in terms of years)
0-5 6-10 11-15 over 15
4. Management level of respondent
Management Level Supervisory Level Subordinate Staff
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
32/34
5. Your department: _______________________________________
6. Which services are currently being outsourced?
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
Section B: Effects of outsourcing
6 In this statement kindly indicate your level of agreement
1 Strongly agree 2 Agree 3 Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly disagree
Factor 1 2 3 4 5
Financial performance improvement in terms of cost reduction was the major
reason why the outsourcing decision was taken
The hospital outsourced in order to increase employee performance and ensure
greater job satisfaction resulting from better training and more efficient work
processes
Improving patient service or satisfaction by reducing waiting times to receive
care or expediting claims processing and payment was the driving force for
outsourcing in the hospital
The Hospital outsourced due to lack of access to qualified personnel to handle
the outsourced services
Insufficient capital in invest in the needed resources was a cause for
outsourcing
The hospital resulted into outsourcing since internal processes, tools and
technology were insufficient to handle revenue cycles activities efficiently and
effectively
The Hospital outsourced in order to focus on it core competencies
The Hospital outsourced in order to make capital funds available for more
profitable operations
The Hospital outsourced in order to improve delivery and reliability of its
services
7 What are the other reasons that contributed to the decision of outsourcing by the management
oftheHospital:_________________________________________________________________
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
33/34
____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8 Does the outsourcing opportunity match the organizations business needs?
Yes No Not Sure
9 Has the outsourcing helped the Hospital to reduce and control costs?
Yes No Not Sure
10 Has the outsourcing led to improved cash flow of the organization?
Yes No Not Sure
11 How often do you carry out performance evaluation on the outsourced services?
Weekly Monthly Quarterly
Semi - Annually Annually Never
12 Did outsourcing provide Hospital employees with additional benefits such as new skills from
employees of the outsourced Companies?
Yes No Not Sure
13 Did outsourcing bring change in organizational practices and culture?
Yes No Not Sure
14 Did outsourcing boost the morale of the employees?
Yes No Not Sure
15 Did outsourcing enhance the relationships between the employees and the management?
Yes No Not Sure
16 Are the employees more efficient as a result of outsourcing?
Yes No Not Sure
8/2/2019 Maritim Project
34/34
17 Has outsourcing led to higher staff turnover?
Yes No Not Sure
18 Comment of the reaction of the staff union (if any) on the outsourcing decision:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
19 In the following statements, please indicate the level of agreement as follows:
1 Strongly agree 2 Agree 3 Neutral 4 Disagree 5 Strongly disagree
Factor 1 2 3 4 5
Patients are now much more satisfied by the services offered by the
Hospital the before
There are fewer patient complaints as a result of outsourcing
As a result of satisfaction derived from the outsourced services patients
would always prefer seeking medical attention from the Hospital
Patients always refer other patients to this Hospital since the get more
satisfied
20 Comment on the overall perception of the patients towards the service delivery of the Hospital:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
21 How does the community in general perceive the Hospitals decision to outsource?
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________