+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Markets Part 2

Markets Part 2

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: ashwin-prasad
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 46

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    1/46

    Dr.Sunitha.S

    Assistant Professor,

    School of Management Studies

    National Institute of Technology Calicut

    Markets: Part 2Monopoly,Monopolistic Competition

    &Oligopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    2/46

    Total, Marginal& Average Revenue

    Price Quantity TotalRevenue

    MarginalRevenue

    AverageRevenue

    Rs6 0 0 -

    5 1 5 5 5

    4 2 8 3 4

    3 3 9 1 32 4 8 -1 2

    1 5 5 -3

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    3/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    P*

    1 5 10

    Monopolists Demand Curve

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    4/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    P*

    D or AR

    1 5 10

    Monopolists Demand Curve

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    5/46

    Monopoly Price, Quantity, and

    Revenue Schedules

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    6/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    Monopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    7/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR or D

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    Monopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    8/46

    Monopoly

    The monopolist's demand curve

    downward sloping

    the greater the market power, the less elastic the demand

    curve(Average Revenue)

    MRbelowAR ((Demand)

    Equilibrium price and output

    Equilibrium output, where MC = MR

    Equilibrium price, found from Dcurve

    Profit

    Measuring profit

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    9/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    D or AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    Monopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    10/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    MC

    Monopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    11/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    MC

    ATC

    Monopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    12/46

    Monopoly

    Costs / Revenue

    Output / Sales

    AC

    MC

    ARMR

    AR (D) curve for a monopolist

    likely to be relatively price

    inelastic. Output assumed to

    be at profit maximising output

    (note caution herenot all

    monopolists may aim for

    profit maximisation!)

    Q1

    Rs7

    Rs 3

    MonopolyProfit

    Given the barriers to entry,

    the monopolist will be able to

    exploit abnormal profits in the

    long run as entry to the

    market is restricted.

    This is both the short run and

    long run equilibrium position

    for a monopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    13/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    MC

    ATC

    Monopoly

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    14/46

    Monopoly

    Pure monopolywhere only one producerexists in the industry

    In reality, rarely existsalways some form of

    substitute available! Monopoly exists therefore where one firm

    dominates the market

    Use term monopoly power with care!

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    15/46

    Price Discrimination

    Act of charging different prices for the same orslightly differentiated products

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    16/46

    Price discrimination.

    Types of price discrimination

    First-degree: the firm is aware of each buyers

    demand curve

    Second-degree: the firm charges a different price,

    depending on the quantity each buyer purchases

    Third-degree: the firm breaks buyers into groupsbased upon their price elasticity of demand

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    17/46

    First Degree Price Discrimination

    (Perfect Price Discrimination)

    Each consumer is charged the price he/she is willing to

    pay.

    Producer takes all the consumer surplus

    Price discrimination.

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    18/46

    2nd Degree Price Discrimination(non-linear pricing)

    Different price is charged for a differentquantity bought (but not acrossconsumers).

    set one price for a 1st bundle, a lowerprice for a 2nd bundle, ....

    extract some, but not all of consumersurplus

    Note:In 1st deg case: different prices charged fordifferent consumers

    In 2nd deg case: different prices charged fordifferent quantities (for same consumer)

    Price discrimination.

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    19/46

    2nd Degree Price Discrimination(non-linear pricing)

    Examples:

    Telephone companies charging different prices for

    different quantities

    A single pack of t shirt may cause you 100, but a pack of

    three would cost you only 175.

    Price discrimination.

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    20/46

    3rdDegree Price Discrimination

    Practice of dividing consumers into two or moregroups with separate demand curves and

    charging different prices to each group

    Eg: regular versus special airline fares, premium

    versus non premium brands of liquor, cannedfood or frozen vegetables, discounts to senior

    citizens & students

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    21/46

    Monopolistic Competition

    Large no: of buyers & sellers

    Differentiated products

    Relevance of Advertisement/selling costs

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    22/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    Monopolistic Competitor Demand

    Curve

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    23/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    Monopolistically Competitive SR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    24/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    MR

    Monopolistically Competitive SR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    25/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    MR

    MC

    Monopolistically Competitive SR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    26/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    MR

    MC

    ATC

    Monopolistically Competitive SR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    27/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    MR

    MC

    ATC

    Monopolistically Competitive SR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    28/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    MR

    MC

    ATC

    Monopolistically Competitive SR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    29/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    MR

    MC

    ATC

    Monopolistically Competitive SR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    30/46

    Long Run

    Monopolistically Competitive

    Firms Price, Quantity, and Profit

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    31/46

    Rs

    Quantity1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    Monopolistically Competitive LR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    32/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62

    Monopolistically Competitive LR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    33/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    Monopolistically Competitive LR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    34/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    MC

    Monopolistically Competitive LR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    35/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    MCATC

    Monopolistically Competitive LR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    36/46

    Rs

    Quantity

    AR

    1 5 10

    22

    1814

    10

    62 MR

    MCATC

    Monopolistically Competitive LR

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    37/46

    Oligopoly Markets

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    38/46

    CHARACTERISTICS OF OLIGOPOLY

    A Few Large Producers

    Homogeneous or Differentiated Products

    Control over Price, but Mutual Interdependence

    Entry Barriers

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    39/46

    Oligopoly

    Price war Price rigidity

    Kinked demand curve

    Price signaling Price leadership

    Collusion-Cartels

    OPECoil cartel, CIPEC-copper cartel

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    40/46

    Oligopoly Factors favouring collusion

    Few firms

    Open with each other

    Similar production methods and average costs

    Similar products

    Dominant firm

    Significant entry barriers

    Stable market

    No government measures to curb collusion

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    41/46

    Features of the four market structures

    Type of

    market

    Number

    of firms

    Freedom of

    entry

    Nature of

    product

    Examples Implications for

    demand curve

    faced by firm

    Perfect

    competition

    Very

    many UnrestrictedHomogeneous

    (undifferentiated)

    Cabbages, carrots

    (approximately)

    Horizontal:

    firm is a price taker

    Monopolistic competition Many /several Unrestricted Differentiated Builders,restaurants

    Downward sloping,

    but relatively elastic

    Oligopoly Few Restricted

    Undifferentiated

    or differentiated

    Cement

    cars, electrical

    appliances

    Downward sloping.

    Relatively inelastic

    (shape depends on

    reactions of rivals)

    Monopoly One Restricted or

    completely

    blocked

    Unique

    Local water

    company, train

    operators (over

    particular routes)

    Downward sloping:more inelastic than

    oligopoly. Firm has

    considerable

    control over price

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    42/46

    Features of the four market structures

    Type of

    market

    Number

    of firms

    Freedom of

    entry

    Nature of

    product

    Examples Implications for

    demand curve

    faced by firm

    Perfect

    competition

    Very

    many UnrestrictedHomogeneous

    (undifferentiated)

    Cabbages, carrots

    (approximately)

    Horizontal:

    firm is a price taker

    Monopolistic

    competition

    Many /

    several Unrestricted DifferentiatedBuilders,

    restaurants

    Downward sloping,

    but relatively elastic

    Oligopoly Few Restricted

    Undifferentiated

    or differentiated

    Cement

    cars, electrical

    appliances

    Downward sloping.

    Relatively inelastic

    (shape depends on

    reactions of rivals)

    Monopoly One Restricted or

    completely

    blocked

    Unique

    Local water

    company, train

    operators (over

    particular routes)

    Downward sloping:more inelastic than

    oligopoly. Firm has

    considerable

    control over price

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    43/46

    Features of the four market structures

    Type of

    market

    Number

    of firms

    Freedom of

    entry

    Nature of

    product

    Examples Implications for

    demand curve

    faced by firm

    Perfect

    competition

    Very

    many UnrestrictedHomogeneous

    (undifferentiated)

    Cabbages, carrots

    (approximately)

    Horizontal:

    firm is a price taker

    Monopolistic

    competition

    Many /

    several Unrestricted DifferentiatedBuilders,

    restaurants

    Downward sloping,

    but relatively elastic

    Oligopoly Few Restricted

    Undifferentiated

    or differentiated

    Cement

    cars, electrical

    appliances

    Downward sloping.

    Relatively inelastic

    (shape depends on

    reactions of rivals)

    Monopoly One Restricted or

    completely

    blocked

    Unique

    Local water

    company, train

    operators (over

    particular routes)

    Downward sloping:more inelastic than

    oligopoly. Firm has

    considerable

    control over price

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    44/46

    Features of the four market structures

    Type of

    market

    Number

    of firms

    Freedom of

    entry

    Nature of

    product

    Examples Implications for

    demand curve

    faced by firm

    Perfect

    competition

    Very

    many UnrestrictedHomogeneous

    (undifferentiated)

    Cabbages, carrots

    (approximately)

    Horizontal:

    firm is a price taker

    Monopolistic

    competition

    Many /

    several Unrestricted DifferentiatedBuilders,

    restaurants

    Downward sloping,

    but relatively elastic

    Oligopoly Few Restricted

    Undifferentiated

    or differentiated

    Cement

    cars, electrical

    appliances

    Downward sloping.

    Relatively inelastic

    (shape depends on

    reactions of rivals)

    Monopoly One Restricted or

    completely

    blocked

    Unique

    Local water

    company, train

    operators (over

    particular routes)

    Downward sloping:more inelastic than

    oligopoly. Firm has

    considerable

    control over price

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    45/46

    Features of the four market structures

    Type of

    market

    Number

    of firms

    Freedom of

    entry

    Nature of

    product

    Examples Implications for

    demand curvefaced by firm

    Perfect

    competition

    Very

    many UnrestrictedHomogeneous

    (undifferentiated)

    Vegetables& other

    farm products

    (approximately)

    Horizontal:

    firm is a price taker

    Monopolistic

    competition

    Many /

    several

    Unrestricted Differentiated Builders,

    restaurants

    Downward sloping,

    but relatively

    elastic

    Oligopoly Few Restricted

    Undifferentiated

    or differentiated

    Cement

    cars, electrical

    appliances

    Downward sloping.

    Relatively inelastic

    (shape depends on

    reactions of rivals)

    Monopoly One Restricted or

    completely

    blocked

    Uniquetrain operators,

    public utilities

    Downward sloping:more inelastic than

    oligopoly. Firm has

    considerable

    control over price

  • 8/13/2019 Markets Part 2

    46/46

    Features of the four market structures

    Type of

    market

    Number

    of firms

    Freedom of

    entry

    Nature of

    product

    Examples Implications for

    demand curvefaced by firm

    Perfect

    competition

    Very

    many UnrestrictedHomogeneous

    (undifferentiated)

    Farm Outputs

    (approximately)

    Horizontal:

    firm is a price taker

    Monopolistic

    competition

    Many /

    several

    Unrestricted Differentiated Builders,

    restaurants

    Downward sloping,

    but relatively elastic

    Oligopoly Few Restricted

    Undifferentiated

    or differentiated

    Cement

    cars, Telecom, Oil

    producers

    Downward sloping.

    Relatively inelastic

    (shape depends on

    reactions of rivals)

    Monopoly One Restricted orcompletely

    blocked

    Unique

    Electricity, Water,

    train operators

    Downward sloping:

    more inelastic than

    oligopoly. Firm has

    considerable

    control over price


Recommended