©2017 Caris Life Sciences 1
Valida5on of a Microsatellite Instability Assay by NGS
Mark R. Miglarese, Ph.D. VP R&D
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Caris Life Sciences®
• Headquarters: Irving, Texas • Laboratory: Phoenix, Arizona
– 66,000 sq. O. oncology-‐focused – ISO 15189, CLIA, CAP, NY State and CE Mark approved/cer5fied
• Profiled 120,000+ pa9ents – 7,000+ physicians – All 50 states – 63 countries
• Laboratory staff – Pathologists – Molecular Gene5cists – Consul5ng Medical Oncologists – MD and/or PhD literature evidence review team – ~100 trained molecular & laboratory technicians
2
230,000+ tests performed in 2016
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Comprehensive Technological Arsenal Fuels Inven5on Across a Broad Range of Molecular Biology
Comprehensive Technology Suite • Sequencing (Next-‐Gen, Whole Exome, Sanger, Pyro)
• Nanostring • PCR (ddPCR, nanoliter scale PCR, qPCR, RT-‐PCR) • Laser Capture Microdissec5on • In Situ Hybridiza5on • Histology, special stains • Immunohistochemistry • Autostaining (DAKO, Ventana) • Slide imaging • Immunoprecipita5on, immunoblohng • Cell culture • ELISA • Robo5cs
• Protein cross-‐linking • Microarray • Mass Spec (Maldi TOF, Quan5ta5ve proteomics)
• HPLC, FPLC • Polyligandhistochemistry • Luminex • Surface plasmon resonance • Dynamic Light Scajering • Fluorescent Ac5vated Cell Sor5ng • In vitro pharmacology • Oligo synthesis (na5ve or modified) • Nanosight • Exosome isola5on and characteriza5on • Liposomal formula5ons
Mul9-‐Disciplinary Exper9se • Bioinforma5cians • Mathema5cians/Sta5s5cians • Medical Oncologists • Molecular Biologists • Molecular Gene5cists • Molecular Pathologists • Research Scien5sts
3
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Caris Clinical Tes5ng Menu
4
Next Gen DNA Sequencing Illumina NextSeq System
ü 592 full genes sequenced
ü Includes all SNVs and indels on guidelines
ü Includes nearly all markers included in clinical trials
Also reported Ø Total Muta5onal Load
Ø Copy Number Varia5on on 442 genes
Ø Micro Satellite Instability
Next Gen RNA Sequencing Illumina MiSeq System
ü 53 genes sequenced
ü Novel transloca5on detec5on independent of intronic breakpoint
ü ALK transloca5on ü ROS1 transloca5on ü RET transloca5on ü NTRK 1-‐3 transloca5ons ü CMET exon 14 skipping ü EFGFv3 ü BRAF transloca5on ü RSPO3 transloca5on
Protein Expression Ventana & Dako Immunohistochemistry
ü 25 lineage specific IHC
ü Lung ü PDL-‐1 (22c3) ü ALK ü PTEN ü RRM1 ü TOPO1 ü TS ü TUBB3
ü CRC ü MMR markers
ü Breast ü ER, PR, AR, Her2
hjp://www.carismolecularintelligence.com/tumor-‐profiling-‐menu/individual-‐tumor-‐profiling-‐menu-‐usa/
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Low High
5
Iden5fying key molecular features that bring value requires understanding the complexity of the system we are working within
Complexity & Func9onal Diversity
©2017 Caris Life Sciences 7
The World just Changed – FDA approved pembro across all solid tumors that are MSI-‐High
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
MSI leads to an increase in the number of neoan5gens and increases the likelihood of immune recogni5on
8 Nature Biotechnology
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Responses observed in a large propor5on of pa5ents
9 (Le et al. Science 2017)
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Significant increase in survival was observed across MSI-‐High pa5ents
10 (Le et al. Science 2017)
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Tradi5onal approach employs PCR to compare tumor to normal across 5 loci
11
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Distribu5on of 27,039 polymorphic microsatellite markers across the human genome
12 Tamiya (2005). Human molecular gene5cs. 14. 2305-‐21. 10.1093/hmg/ddi234.
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
MSI Valida5on Process
13
Compare NGS data to PCR (comparing cancer and normal 5ssue) on ~2200 pa5ents
Algorithm Training: Maximize Sensi5vity, Specificity, NPV, and PPV
Test on 200 Naïve pa5ents and compare to MSI by PCR and MMR by IHC
All (2196 Pa9ents) Sensi5vity Specificity PPV NPV
95.8% 99.4% 94.5% 99.2%
CRC (1198 Pa9ents) Sensi5vity Specificity PPV NPV
100.0% 99.9% 98.7% 99.6%
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Distribu5on of in-‐dels across 5K pa5ents
MSI
Number of loci
Freq
uenc
y of
pat
ient
s
20 40 60 80 100 120
010
020
030
0
14
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
●
●● ●● ●● ●●●● ●●●● ●●● ● ●●● ●●● ●
● ●● ●
● ●●● ●●● ●●● ● ●● ●●● ● ●●●● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ●●● ●●● ●●● ●●● ● ●● ●● ● ●●●● ●●● ●● ●●● ●● ●● ●● ●●●● ●● ●●● ●● ●●●● ● ● ● ●●● ● ● ●●●
●●
●
●●● ●● ●● ● ●● ●● ● ●● ●● ●● ●● ● ●● ●●● ● ●● ●● ●● ●●●●● ●●●● ●●● ● ●● ●● ● ● ● ● ●●● ● ●●● ● ●●● ●●●●● ●● ●●● ●●● ●● ● ●●● ●● ● ● ●●● ●● ● ●● ●●● ●●● ● ●● ● ●●● ●● ●● ●● ● ● ●●●
●● ●● ● ● ●● ● ●●● ● ●●●● ●●
● ● ●●●●●
●● ●● ●●●● ●●●
●● ●
● ●● ●●
●
● ●
●●● ●●● ●●●● ●● ●● ●● ●●●● ●● ● ●●● ● ●●●● ●●●● ● ● ●● ●●●●● ●●
●●
●●●●●● ●
●● ● ●● ●●
●
●
● ●● ●● ● ● ●● ●● ● ● ●●● ●
● ●●● ●●●● ●● ● ●● ●●● ●● ●● ●●●● ●●● ●●● ●●● ●● ●
●● ●● ● ●●● ●● ● ● ●●●●●
●● ●● ●●
● ●
●●●● ● ● ●● ●
●● ●●● ●●●
●
●
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Bladder Cancer
Breast CarcinomaCholangiocarcinoma
Colorectal AdenocarcinomaEsophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma
Extrahepatic Bile Duct AdenocarcinomaFemale Genital Tract Malignancy
Gastric AdenocarcinomaGastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)
GlioblastomaHead and neck Squamous Carcinoma
Kidney CancerLiver Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Low Grade GliomaLung Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC)Lung Non−small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Lung Small Cell Cancer (SCLC)Lymphoma
Male Genital Tract MalignancyMalignant Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Pleura (MSFT)
MelanomaMultiple Myeloma
Neuroendocrine tumorsNodal Diffuse Large B−Cell Lymphoma
Non Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (non−EOC)None Of These Apply
Ovarian Surface Epithelial CarcinomasPancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Prostatic AdenocarcinomaRetroperitoneal or Peritoneal Carcinoma
Retroperitoneal or Peritoneal SarcomaSmall Intestinal Malignancies
Soft Tissue TumorsThymic CarcinomaThyroid Carcinoma
Uveal Melanoma
50 100
150
200
250
300
350
NGS MSI Count per Sample
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
408 194 93
46 228
1417
9
N=8952
All Lineages
TML
MSI
PDL1
Rela5onship between MSI, TML, PDL-‐1
17
3% of Pa5ents are MSI unstable
17.6% of Pa5ents are PDL-‐1 posi5ve
8.1% of Pa5ents are TML high
©2017 Caris Life Sciences
Frequency of MSI across lineages
21 (Le et al. Science 2017)
Stage 4
Stage 3