+ All Categories
Home > Documents > MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e....

MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e....

Date post: 03-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM MARS MARS For Private Circulation Only
Transcript
Page 1: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARS

For P

rivat

e Ci

rcul

atio

n O

nly

Page 2: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities
Page 3: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

Every investor while investing wishes to maximise his

returns while minimising his risk. Asset Allocation and

Superior scheme selection are time tested proven ways for

doing the same. But time and again it has been proven that

for an investor to manage his asset allocation and select

superior schemes is extremely tough and di�cult to execute

due to operational and behavioural reasons.

MARS (Mutual Fund Automated Portfolio Rebalancing

System) tries to overcome these issues for investors

whereby they can manage their asset allocation and invest

in better performing schemes by the click of a mouse and

maximise their returns. As the process is system driven and

operationally smooth, it also helps weed out behavioural

biases. MARS gives a wide array of portfolios to choose from

to the investor based on his risk appetite and periodically

triggers portfolio rebalancing based on deviations from the

asset allocation of the model portfolio resulting in superior

returns to the investor over a period of time.

Page 4: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities
Page 5: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARSPRESENTING

MARS stands for Mutual Fund Automated Portfolio Rebalancing System

It gives clients access to a range of well diversi�ed portfolios to choose from.

There are 2 broad sets of asset allocation portfolios:

A) Dynamic Asset Allocation: the asset allocation between equity and debt would vary depending on the risk in the equity markets; higher the risk, lower will be the allocation into equities and vice versa.

B) Fixed Asset Allocation: the asset allocation between equity and debt will be kept �xed.

The underlying MF schemes will be selected by the NJ Research Team.

The asset allocation rebalancing would be done yearly for Fixed Asset Allocation and quarterly for Dynamic Asset Allocation.

The MARS portfolios are only available to clients holding Trading and Demat Accounts with NJ.

SALIENT FEATURES OF MARS

Client can select a model portfolio depending on his requirements and investment needs.

Helps the client to invest in well researched mutual fund schemes in his portfolio.

Simple execution tools for portfolio rebalancing.

Enhanced returns resulting from disciplined asset allocation.

BENEFITS OF MARS

Portfolios designed by the NJ Research team will be made available on the MARS platform.

Client has an option to select any of the available portfolios with the help of his NJ partner.

The client can buy into MARS by transferring his existing MF portfolio.

The client can also buy into MARS through cheque / net banking / debit card / auto debit mandate

The client will be required to authorize all the purchase transactions either online through a single click or signing the TIS provided by NJ Partner.

Rebalancing of the portfolio is triggered as per schedule of various portfolios. The client needs to authorise the same to realign the portfolio with his target asset allocation.

HOW DOES MARS WORK

1

Page 6: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

WHAT IS ASSET ALLOCATIONAsset Allocation, simply means, investing money across asset classes, namely equities, bonds and cash. It is the key ingredient for any investor wanting to create wealth in the long term.

Asset allocation is also important because di�erent asset classes, due to their inherent nature, behave di�erently. Equity, which represents ownership in a business or enterprise, is volatile in nature and tends to go up and down in the short term. On the other hand, bond, which represents lending money to a business or enterprise, is relatively more stable and provides regular income in the form of interest. Diversifying the client's investments across di�erent asset classes will result in diversifying the investment risk and create a well balanced portfolio that can o�set the impact of investments that are currently not doing well and take advantage of investments that are currently growing and performing well.

PORTFOLIO REBALANCINGValues of individual asset classes can go up and down in line with the underlying market movements. While this is no reason for the client to panic, it is important for the client to review his initial asset allocation with the current asset allocation and make course correction through portfolio rebalancing. Let us look at this example:

The �rst client, whom we will call Client A followed a disciplined portfolio rebalancing strategy as recommended by his advisor. The second client, Client B did not follow any rebalancing strategy. He invested his money and did not look at it for the next 3 years.

On January 1st, 2007, two clients invested R 10 lakhs each in a portfolio with the following asset allocation:

Equities : 70% invested in CNX 500 portfolio Debt : 30% invested in Bank FD

Equity 70%

Debt 30%

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARS

2

Page 7: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

POINTS TO NOTE:

In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro�ts in equities and reinvested the proceeds in bonds bringing the asset allocation back to 70:30.

In year 2 i.e. CY 2008, when equities gave returns of -57.13%, Client A invested more money in equities by reducing allocation to bonds bringing the asset allocation back to 70:30.

In year 3 i.e. CY 2009, when equities bounced back and gave returns of 88.57%, Client A's overall portfolio value increased to R14.96 Lakhs while Client B was at R12.92 Lakhs.

Client A's CAGR return is an impressive 14.36% p.a. while Client B is only 8.93% p.a.Source:1. Equity Returns are derived from CNX 500.2. Debt Returns are based on 1 year FD rates available in Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy on RBI website.

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARSHere is what happened: As can be seen from table, Client A rebalanced his portfolio on an annual basis while Client B followed a buy and hold strategy.

Client A Client BStarting AA Equity 7,00,000

Debt 3,00,000

Year 1 Returns(CY 2007)

Equity 62.51%Debt 8.07%

Portfolio Value Equity 11,37,570@ end of Yr 1 Debt 3,24,210

Rebalanced PV Equity 10,23,246 11,37,570@ start of Yr 2 Debt 4,38,534 3,24,210

Year 2 Returns(CY 2008)

Equity -57.13%Debt 8.06%

Portfolio Value Equity 4,38,666 4,87,676@ end of Yr 2 Debt 4,73,880 3,50,341

Rebalanced PV Equity 6,38,782 4,87,676@ start of Yr 3 Debt 2,73,764 3,50,341

Year 3 Returns(CY 2009)

Equity 88.57%Debt 6.47%

Portfolio Value Equity 12,04,551 9,19,611@ end of Yr 3 Debt 2,91,476 3,73,008

Totals 14,96,027 12,92,620Abs. Return 49.60% 29.26%

XIRR 14.37% 8.93%CY = Calendar Year

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R

R R

R

R

R

R

3

Page 8: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

PERFORMANCE OF DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUNDSDiversi�ed equity mutual funds, over the long term, have outperformed the popular benchmarks and in�ation by a very impressive margin. Let us brie�y analyse the table below. On a 5 year basis, equity funds have generated CAGR returns of 19.85% p.a. which is 1.18% p.a. more on CAGR basis than the BSE Sensex. If we look at 10 years and 12 years, the di�erence in returns widens to 1.76% p.a. and 4.77% p.a. respectively, on a CAGR basis over the Sensex.

If a client would have invested R1 Lakh in a portfolio of average diversi�ed equity funds, his investment would have grown to R2.47 lakhs in 5 years, R4.63 lakhs in 10 years and R10.26 lakhs in 12 years. The corresponding numbers for BSE Sensex are R2.35 lakhs for 5 years, R3.98 lakhs for 10 years and R6.34 lakhs for 12 years.

Therefore, it is extremely rewarding to invest in diversi�ed equity funds with a longer term view.

Though diversi�ed equity funds as a category has outperformed the benchmarks by huge margins over long periods of time, there is a huge variation in terms of returns of individual schemes.

Let us look at some data to corroborate this fact. If we split the entire universe of diversi�ed equity funds into 4 parts and do a 3 year rolling return analysis of the top and bottom quartiles ( Top 25% and Bottom 25% schemes) only, the di�erence in returns between the Top 25% and Bottom 25% schemes is anywhere between 14% - 18% p.a. on a 3 year CAGR basis.

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARS

Source: Internal, Performance is as on Nov 30, 2013 and on a CAGR basis;Past Performance may or may not be sustained in future

Source: Internal

5 Years 7 Years 10 Years 12 Years

Average of Diversified Schemes 19.85% 7.00% 16.58% 21.42%

BSE 200 18.89% 5.75% 14.00% 17.82%

18.67% 5.98% 14.82% 16.65%

NSE 500 18.16% 6.41% 13.97% 15.75%

BSE Sensex

3 Years Rolling Returns of Diversi�ed Equity Schemes

2010-2012 2009-2011 2008-2010 2007-2009 2006-2008

Average of Top 25% Schemes 13.94% 26.03% 6.23% 16.76% 6.30%

Average of Bottom 25% Schemes -4.52% 9.29% -8.85% 2.17% -9.41%

Difference 18.46% 16.74% 15.08% 14.59% 15.71%

Universe 229 224 199 165 133

4

Page 9: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

PERFORMANCE OF DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUNDSIf a client would have invested R1 Lakh in a portfolio of the Top 25% diversi�ed equity schemes, his investment would have grown to R1.47 lakhs in 2010-2012 vs. R0.87 lakhs in the Bottom 25% schemes. Similarly, had he invested the same amount in 2007-2009, his invested would have grown to R1.59 lakhs in the Top 25% schemes vs. R1.06 lakhs in the Bottom 25% schemes.

Not being in the right vehicle i.e. Top 25% schemes can result in a lot of unhappy clients as they will underperform substantially.

Let us extend this data to 5 years. If we look at any of the periods below, the di�erence in returns between the Top 25% and Bottom 25% schemes is anywhere between 10.71% p.a. going up to as high as 15.08% p.a. on a 5 year CAGR basis.

If a client would have invested R1 Lakh in a portfolio of the Top 25% diversi�ed equity schemes, his investment would have grown to R2.63 lakhs in 2006-2010 vs. R1.66 lakhs in the Bottom 25% schemes. Similarly, if the client would have invested the same amount in 2008-2012, his investment would have grown to R1.34 lakhs in the Top 25% schemes vs. R0.62 lakhs in the Bottom 25% schemes.

The results are very evident that in diversi�ed equity mutual funds, Scheme Selection plays vital role in determining the return for the investor.

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARS

Source: Internal

5 Years Rolling Returns of Diversi�ed Equity Schemes

2008-2012 2007-2011 2006-2010 2005-2009 2004-2008

Average of Top 25% Schemes

Average of Bottom 25% Schemes

Difference

Universe

6.18% 8.74% 21.42% 27.43% 19.60%

-8.90% -2.18% 10.71% 15.25% 6.35%

15.08% 10.92% 10.71% 12.18% 13.25%

184 164 133 92 70

5

Page 10: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

CONSERVATIVE PORTFOLIO

MODERATE PORTFOLIO

AGGRESSIVE PORTFOLIO

HOW TO DETERMINE THE BEST ASSET ALLOCATION

MARS PORTFOLIOS

Asset classes vary on the basis of their average returns and volatility. Equities have the potential to give higher returns but the volatility of the returns is also high. Bonds are relatively more stable and pay �xed interest at de�ned frequencies.

The best approach to asset allocation is to �nd out the risk appetite of each client. The greater the appetite for risk, the larger the share of the portfolio that can be allocated to equities.

Risk appetite may di�er from individual to individual based on his investment horizon, ability to bear loss, current �nancial status, current job status, social background etc. These are some of the factors a�ecting risk appetite for any person. The advisor should determine the right asset allocation for the client based on his understanding of all these factors.

MARS broadly o�ers 3 types of portfolios based on the risk pro�le of an individual:

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARS

Equity: 0% - 30% Debt: 70% - 100% Risk Pro�le: CONSERVATIVE

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19211.73%

1935.51%

-11.11%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16811.85%

022.48%

2.73%

5 Year Rolling

14411.84%

018.54%

7.46%

10 Year Rolling

8412.38%

014.10%11.21%

DAA - CONSERVATIVE PORTFOLIODynamic Asset Allocation - Conservative Portfolio is suitable for a client who is risk averse, wants minimal risk to principal, is comfortable with low volatility and modest capital appreciation and has a time horizon of 1 - 3 years. The equity allocation may vary from 0% - 30% based on the asset allocation model developed by NJ Research Team. The said model takes in account equity market scenario, valuations and economic growth indicators. The rebalancing will happen on a quarterly basis.

6

Page 11: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

Risk Pro�le: MODERATE

Risk Pro�le: AGGRESSIVE

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19215.98%

3768.46%

-28.50%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16815.77%

239.62%-1.18%

5 Year Rolling

14415.84%

030.70%

6.09%

10 Year Rolling

8416.97%

020.56%14.07%

Equity: 0% - 60% Debt: 40% - 100%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19221.62%

46115.07%-49.00%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16819.92%

962.46%-6.46%

5 Year Rolling

14419.92%

046.55%

2.93%

10 Year Rolling

8421.69%

028.19%16.52%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

DAA - MODERATE PORTFOLIODynamic Asset Allocation - Moderate Portfolio is suitable for a client with a moderate risk appetite, portfolio gives a balanced mix of equity and debt. Ideal investment horizon for this portfolio is 3 – 5 years and the volatility level in these portfolios is medium. The equity allocation may vary from 0% - 60% based on the asset allocation model developed by NJ Research Team. The said model takes in account equity market scenario, valuations and economic growth indicators. The rebalancing in the portfolio will happen on a quarterly basis.

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARS

Equity: 0% - 100% Debt: 0% - 100%

DAA - AGGRESSIVE PORTFOLIODynamic Asset Allocation - Aggressive Portfolio is suitable for a client who wants a growth oriented equity portfolio, is comfortable with medium to long term volatility and is looking at long term capital appreciation with a time horizon of 5 – 10 years. The equity allocation may vary from 0% - 100% based on the asset allocation model developed by NJ Research Team. The said model takes in account equity market scenario, valuations and economic growth indicators. The rebalancing in the dynamic portfolio will happen on a quarterly basis.

7

Page 12: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

Equity: 10% Debt: 90%

FIXED ASSET ALLOCATION PORTFOLIOSApart from the DAA Portfolios, MARS also o�ers Fixed Asset Allocation portfolios. There are multiple portfolios which o�er the option to invest in FAA ranging from 10% Equity upto 100% Equity exposure. The rebalancing in these portfolios will happen on a yearly basis.

The details of these portfolios are mentioned as under:

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARS

FAA – E 10

Equity: 20% Debt: 80%FAA – E 20

Equity: 30% Debt: 70%FAA – E 30

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

1928.80%

018.67%

1.54%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

1688.73%

012.16%

4.09%

5 Year Rolling

1448.64%

010.35%

6.42%

10 Year Rolling

848.74%

09.43%7.94%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19210.09%

1028.95%-4.98%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16810.11%

016.71%

1.36%

5 Year Rolling

14410.15%

014.63%

6.71%

10 Year Rolling

8410.48%

011.54%

9.13%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

Risk Pro�le: CONSERVATIVE

Risk Pro�le: CONSERVATIVE

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19211.31%

2539.39%

-11.50%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16811.33%

322.48%-1.35%

5 Year Rolling

14411.48%

018.85%

6.10%

10 Year Rolling

8412.04%

013.46%10.11%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

Risk Pro�le: CONSERVATIVE

8

Page 13: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARSEquity: 40% Debt: 60%FAA – E 40

Equity: 50% Debt: 50%FAA – E 50

Equity: 60% Debt: 40%FAA – E 60

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19212.47%

3549.97%

-18.02%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16812.39%

528.27%-4.05%

5 Year Rolling

14412.63%

023.02%

5.35%

10 Year Rolling

8413.42%

015.20%10.89%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19213.57%

3860.70%

-24.53%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16813.28%

834.09%-6.73%

5 Year Rolling

14413.60%

027.15%

4.38%

10 Year Rolling

8414.61%

016.73%11.45%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

Risk Pro�le: MODERATE

Risk Pro�le: MODERATE

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19214.60%

4471.55%

-31.05%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16814.01%

1239.94%-9.39%

5 Year Rolling

14414.39%

031.24%

3.21%

10 Year Rolling

8415.62%

018.21%11.80%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

Risk Pro�le: MODERATE

9

Page 14: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARSEquity: 70% Debt: 30%FAA – E 70

Equity: 80% Debt: 20%FAA – E 80

Equity: 90% Debt: 10%FAA – E 90

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19215.56%

5082.55%

-37.57%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16814.57%

1245.84%

-12.05%

5 Year Rolling

14414.99%

035.29%

1.94%

10 Year Rolling

8416.42%

019.63%11.93%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19216.46%

5393.67%

-44.09%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16814.96%

1551.78%

-14.69%

5 Year Rolling

14415.38%

039.31%

0.58%

10 Year Rolling

8417.02%

020.92%11.81%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

Risk Pro�le: AGGRESSIVE

Risk Pro�le: AGGRESSIVE

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19217.29%

57104.91%-50.61%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16815.15%

1957.77%

-17.33%

5 Year Rolling

14415.55%

243.31%-0.88%

10 Year Rolling

8417.38%

022.10%11.43%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

Risk Pro�le: AGGRESSIVE

10

Page 15: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

Methodology used for calculating historical returns

Equity Returns are derived from CNX 500.

Debt Returns are based on 1 year FD rates available in Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy on RBI website.

In Fixed Asset Allocation Model Portfolios, rebalancing is done on a yearly basis in the month of December.

In Dynamic Asset Allocation Model Portfolios, rebalancing is done on a quarterly basis.

Period of Analysis: January 1st, 1997 to November 30th, 2013.

Rolling returns are returns for overlapping cycles within a particular period of analysis. Returns have been calculated for 1, 3, 5 and 10 year cycles using monthly values within the period mentioned above. For e.g. 1 year rolling period starts from Jan 1st, 1997 – Dec 31st, 1997, Jan 31st, 1997 – Jan 31st, 1998, Nov 30th, 2012 – Nov 30th, 2013 and so on. 3 year rolling period starts from Jan 1st, 1997 – Dec 31st, 1999, Jan 31st, 1997 – Jan 31st, 2000, Nov 30th, 2010 – Nov 30th, 2013 and so.

Ideal Risk Pro�le is mention against each portfolio. Client should select the portfolio for investment according to his risk appetite.

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARSEquity: 100% Debt: 0%FAA – E 100

NO. OF OBSERVATIONSAVERAGE RETURNNO. OF OBS. WITH NEGATIVE RETURNSMAXIMUM RETURNMINIMUM RETURN

19218.05%

57116.27%-57.13%

1 Year Rolling

3 Year Rolling

16815.14%

3163.81%

-19.97%

5 Year Rolling

14415.47%

847.35%-2.42%

10 Year Rolling

8417.47%

023.15%10.75%

Historical Risk / Return (Jan 1997 – Nov 2013)

Risk Pro�le: AGGRESSIVE

11

Page 16: MARS BOOKLET SMALL -3 copy › app › pdf › njmars-booklet.pdf · POINTS TO NOTE: In year 1 i.e. CY 2007, when equities gave returns of 62.51%, Client A booked pro˚ts in equities

MUTUAL FUND AUTOMATED PORTFOLIO REBALANCING SYSTEM

MARSMARSwww.njwealth.in

Disclaimer:

This Handbook document is made by NJ India Invest Private Limited (“NJ India”) for private circulation and information purposes only. The information/data mentioned in this document is taken from various sources for which NJ India does not assume any responsibility or liability and neither does guarantee its accuracy or adequacy. Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks. Investors are advised to read the o�er documents/scheme related documents and other risk factors carefully before investing in any scheme. The past performance of a scheme is not indicative of its future performance. Investors are advised to take advice of experts before making any investment decisions. This document shall not be construed as a �nancial/investment advice and/or as solicitation/advice to buy or sell any �nancial product.

NJ India Invest Pvt. Ltd. Block No. 901 & 902, 6th Floor, 'B' Tower,Udhna Udyog Nagar Sangh Commercial Complex, Central Road No. 10, Udhna,

Surat - 394 210, Gujarat. Phone: 0261 398 5500.


Recommended