+ All Categories
Home > Education > Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

Date post: 14-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: chris-marsden
View: 214 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
36
Net Neutrality law: NOT business as usual Prof Chris Marsden University of Sussex @ChrisTMarsden www.chrismarsden.blogspot.com 04/29/2022
Transcript
Page 1: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Net Neutrality law: NOT business as usual

Prof Chris MarsdenUniversity of Sussex

@ChrisTMarsdenwww.chrismarsden.blogspot.com

Page 2: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Background: Internet Science, RAND, ITC UK, WorldCom, start-ups

Net Neutrality: Towards a Co-regulatory Solution Bloomsbury, 2010

Net Neutrality: From Policy to Law to Regulation Manchester UP, 2016

Regulating Code (with Prof. Ian Brown) MIT Press, 2013

Network Neutrality: A Research Guide Handbook Of Internet Research

Internet Co-regulation Cambridge UP, 2011

Bibliography of Internet Law Oxford UP, 2012

Page 3: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Prior art....

Page 4: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Brazil follows India, bans zero rating 11 May http://

chrismarsden.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/brazil-bans-zero-rating-fudges.html

DECRETO Nº 8.771, DE 11 DE MAIO DE 2016 Regulamenta a Lei no 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014,

para tratar das hipóteses admitidas de discriminação de pacotes de dados na internet e de degradação de tráfego, indicar procedimentos para guarda e proteção de dados por provedores de conexão e de aplicações, apontar medidas de transparência na requisição de dados cadastrais pela administração pública e estabelecer parâmetros para fiscalização e apuração de infrações.

BREAKING NEWS…

Page 5: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

The Internet: for everyone

Page 6: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Regulatory Toolkit: which mix of economics, engineering, behavioural & evolutionary neuroscience (‘nudges’ & groups), human

rights law?

Page 7: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

RFC 6973 Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols RFC 7258 Pervasive Monitoring Is an Attack

‘process’ rather than a ‘technical’ document, impact on every strand of work the IETF does, including the development and revision of standards.

Ted Hardy (Google): “we’ve spent 20 years optimising for bandwidth and

speed, it’s time we also started optimising for privacy” RFC 7624, Confidentiality in the Face of Pervasive

Surveillance: A Threat Model and Problem Statement Working groups consider pervasive monitoring and provide

guidance for how such attacks could be mitigated.

IETF and Privacy from Government Attacks

Page 8: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Mobile roaming internationally Potential abolition of charges by 2018

‘Open Internet’ (not net neutrality) Some protection from throttling

Both came into force 1st May 2016 Latter subject to BEREC Guidelines

to be issued by 30 August 2016

EU Regulation 2015/2120

Page 9: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Details of the Regulation

7 relevant pages with Articles 3-7

19 Recitals: PECP/PIAS TMM v

CAS Interesting

definitions! “Strict interpretation

and to proportionality requirements” (Recital 11)

Four issue areas for BEREC Transparency and evidence

Recital 19, Article 4 in force! Zero rating

Recital 7 ‘material effect’ Specialised services

Recitals 16-17, Art.3(5) Enforcement of TMP/Privacy

Recital 18, Art.3(4), Art.5/6

Page 10: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Test is not FRAND but RTNDP

FRAND Fair Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory Settled case law and

regulatory practice for this approach

RTNDP Reasonable Transparent Non-Discriminatory Proportionate Not entirely clear where

this standard lies? Case law of CJEU needed? That would delay us

years

Page 11: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Recital 10, 33-35 – date incorrect on EDPS opinion (14/11/2013) e.g. DPI motivated Dutch law: KPN investor call in May 2011

PHORM returns? 2006-7 illegal interception UK See my 2014 report for government of Korea on exactly this

Italy and UK 3 ad-blocking an example? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35615430

“Customers should not have to pay data charges because of adverts

mobile ads should not access handset data without explicit consent,

owners should only see advertising that is relevant, interesting to them

rather than obtrusive and untargeted information”

Specific content monitoring could be interpreted as prohibited by the Regulation

Page 12: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Relationship nationally & EU level with BEREC members Enforced by DPA, evidence gathered by comms

regulator? Note emerging US FTC-FCC re. Title II data

collection http://www.theverge.com/2016/2/16/11017934/n

et-neutrality-data-collection-fcc-title-ii

Is privacy enforcement by the Article29 Working Group?

Page 13: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Illustration of user choice

Page 14: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Has telecoms developed as fast and free?

UCL tests 1.125Tb/s You get 1/1,000,000th

of that?

Innovation in PC hardware

Page 15: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Universal Service? UHDTV 15Mb/s

Page 16: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Nothing in regulation is new

Page 17: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

BEREC work to August 2016

Page 18: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Self- and co-regulatory solutions need explicit legal act

New legislation required in a few extraordinary nations

assuming all stay in the EU/EEA that long….

UK position on government-mandated or “encouraged” opt-ins

Page 19: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Regulatory capture?

Page 20: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

IoT relies on stable connections Cloud relies on stable connections Big Data apps rely on stable connections

New Services? That 4th Industrial Revolution (sic) thing?

Page 21: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Welcome to the new boss….same as the old boss?

Consumers’ associations & civil society deeply suspicious of DT/Orange links to ministry and former bureaucrats

But they are all honourable men http://www.reuters.com/article/france-orange-

idUSL5N10968F20150729

Page 22: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Four weeks’ consultation in July – what process amends guidelines?

“scarcely two months to evaluate and incorporation of potentially thousands submissions in several languages, 

an extraordinary plenary then votes on the finished document” https://netzpolitik.org/2016/netzneutralitaet-wie-es-jetzt-weiter-geht/

Wrong –actually ONE month. London & Oslo, how’s your Slovenian?

Page 23: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

“4million people participated in FCC consultation 

In India, there were over one million people,  arguably greatest direct democratic

participation movements in history, for an internet issue . 

BEREC consultation finishes after twenty days making it the shortest of the three.”

https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fnetzpolitik.org%2F2016%2Fnetzneutralitaet-wie-es-jetzt-weiter-geht%2F&edit-text=&act=url

Students are on holiday in July – good timing?

Or millions…?

Page 24: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Astroturfed zero rating? TRAI refused to admit FBK poll on FreeBasics

Page 25: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

They hate their telcos Speeds are inadequate in most EU countries – esp.

compared to academic not-for-profit networks They hate surveillance

Five Eyes, Snowden, PRISM, Squeaky Dolphin They value privacy

Schrems, Digital Rights Ireland, PHORM-BT They distrust regulators

See telcos and security services as allies – and you?

Why are (some) people angry?

Page 26: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

But maybe BEREC remains invisible?

Page 27: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

[EDRi evidence to BEREC] right to receive, seek and impart information (Article 11) the freedom to conduct business (Article 16) right to provide services in all 28 Member States (Article

15.2)Traffic management must be application-agnostic: class-based traffic management prevents the roll-out of

new services, harm competition, innovation, privacy, users congestion affects end-users’ choice if not properly

managed

“The Regulation must be read in light of the Charter of Fundamental Rights”

Page 28: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Telekom’s Hottges’ start-up tax announcement right after adoption of net neutrality rules What will BEREC decide, as FRAND solution

apparently off the table? FRAND would have been easier for you? Or physical/logical separation? DOCSIS3 issue

Regulators must not allow the reclassification of online services and applications as “specialised

services”

Page 29: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Leads to uncompetitive market consolidation between IAPs & Content Application Providers EU protectionism vs US OTTs? ETNO v. BEREC?

BEREC, NRAs and competition authorities should stop IAPs

making access to their customer base a new form of monopoly

Page 30: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

affects individual users’ freedom to impart information;

a commercial practice; violates the Regulation’s ban on blocking and

throttling; TMM would not be temporary, as required by

Regulation; distorts competition and limits end-users’ choice.

Is it reasonable to interpret that zero-rating is prohibited?

Page 31: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Zero rating only used outside EU?

Page 32: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

By Region (TB per Month)North America

 557,237  831,457  1,199,309

 1,700,159

 2,327,596

 3,208,203 42%

Western Europe

 432,322  707,537  1,045,171

 1,477,156

 2,060,788

 2,795,362 45%

Asia Pacific

 1,578,865

 2,676,873

 4,422,785

 6,725,446

 9,771,677

 13,712,874 54%

Latin America

 276,416  447,991  714,540  1,065,744

 1,521,312

 2,091,703 50%

Central and Eastern Europe

 545,750  946,263  1,510,630

 2,242,669

 3,249,449

 4,442,281 52%

Middle East and Africa

 294,476  569,895  1,038,661

 1,723,221

 2,777,550

 4,313,794 71%

Cisco VNI Mobile Forecast to 2020

Page 33: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Free football Slovenia example (Ungerer warning 1999)

Page 34: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Costs vary enormously along with zero rating to exclude OTTs

Page 35: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

[2016] Comparative Case Studies in Implementing Net Neutrality: A Critical Analysis of Zero Rating

SCRIPT-Ed 13:1 at http://script-ed.org/ [2015] Zero Rating and Mobile Net Neutrality,

Chapter 18, pp241-260 in Belli and de Filippi eds. ‘Net Neutrality Compendium: Human Rights, Free

Competition and the Future of the Internet’ Springer

Research articles on zero rating (in addition to Prof. van Schewick)

Page 36: Marsden Kings Net Neutrality Seminar 16 05 2016

05/01/2023

Net Neutrality: Discrimination, Competition,

and Innovation in the UK and USAlissa Cooper and Ian Brown (2015)

ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 15(1): 2-21http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2700055


Recommended