MARWICK MITCMELL AND CO SAN FRANCISCO CALIF SAN …Re: San Francisco Data Package No. 4 Dear Mike:...

AD-A099 954 PEAT MARWICK MITCMELL AND CO SAN FRANCISCO CALIF F/6 1/2SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DATA PACKAGE NUMBER 4. AIRP--ETC(UjMAR 79 DOT-FA77WA-3961

UNCLASSIFIED N

END

SA 5A1*7ANCI5C

IfI;**

DATAPACKAQE4"4

LEYLL TASK FORCE DELAY,$TUDIES,......................

.... ....

- ~ - ......... ...... ..... . .. . .. ... .*. ..... .

19L14C~.... .. . ..... ......... .. .IDE~ ~ ~ ~ ..........** *~

-A NIXprpae for4

I-l~a DEARTMENTOF TRANSO.TAT.O..... ..... ....

eEA AVATO AD IITR TO

ubhc r........under ...n.r..-----------J

DO-A7W-36C.." PetrMawikMrcell & forLLJ D DEPRTMEN OF ARCHA1979

PEAT, M RWICK, MITC13ELL CO.P. 0. BOX 8007

SAN I A CISCO 1l7R3N2ATION.L A.IPO R

SANF RANCISCO. CAIFORNIA 94*28

Telephone: (415) 347-9521

March 15,. 1979

Mr. Michael M. Scott, ATF-4Federal Aviation Administration800 Independence Avenue, S.W.Washington, D.C. 20591

Re: San Francisco Data Package No. 4

Dear Mike:

Enclosed is Data Package No. 4 for San Francisco InternationalAirport. The package contains the revised results of theStage 1 delay experiments (Attachment A). and results of theStage 2 airfield simulation model experiments (Attachment B).

These data should be reviewed by the San Francisco Task Forceduring the March 16, 1979, Task Force meeting.

Sincerely,

Stephen L. M. HockadayManager

SLMH/nlmEnclosure

cc: Mr. J. R. Dupree (ALG-312) 7Mr. Royal Mink (AWE-4) D- c

- . . G. r

Di t L

.. ... .... .. ........ .... ....dl.... .

Attachment A

J RESULTS OF REVISED STAGE 1. DELAY EXPERIMENTS

San Francisco International Airport

Airport Improvemert Task Force Delay Studies

I Peat, Marwick, Mitchell &Co.San Francisco; California

March 1979

'- 10 034 3

140 >4I

E- E44 94 .4

0 >

41 -A4.4 . .4, l - 0- C -44

0P 0 X 0 E

~0~Z0

-A4 v >0 -

S.'~1 1.' Is~3O t4

5.w i44 04> -4 ,-4-4 P 4 r4- P~ -- 4 P- r4N r4 P

4Jr-214 $4h

4)4 44 -4 - P-4 P4 111 -4

0 U

"- I

N k4 4W

-4 r.4

Er-40 m(

a,~4 001 C1- "l0

4, r- 4 Ln 4' 0

00 0'4 n 0 LO 000C Ln V-4 NA 00 P4>1 w LM Ln '.4

Id -I

lw 0 N 04 r.-N t%. IV %D' .- 0 0

r-4x a,

>0

0 k

MU E-1 xUI U O 4

$4 ix

I 01

E- E'I E4 E' E'

1-2.1 4* '.1 '.1 u-I >4 u-I u-I to4

(d1 Id4 go I o 4t

!- .- N -4 r~-I -4('4 r 4 9 (1 r 4 -I r-4 O0

4P4

-4 %004 0

ON 010%

V% 0 fn t 0% ued u-I r- - P -41r

"q u-i c m qw n %0 1-IN f-- OD 0%0 V' fn C LAP4 u-I u-I u-1 P.4 P.4M4 V4t

4

Experiment No. 3

Objective:

To obtain 1977 baseline delay estimates for the followingrunway use in IFRI weather:

Arrival Runways Departure Runways

28R 1L, 1R, 28L

Related Comparison Experiments:

None directly in Stage I.

Results:

Figure 3A shows that total aircraft flows vary from 9 to63 aircraft per hour over the 15-hour simulation run. Thepeak hour is from 0900 to 1000 hours and contains 6 arrivalaircraft and 7 departure aircraft.

Figure 3B shows that average delays to aircraft using therunways are as high as 60+ minutes per aircraft. Peak-houraverage delays are 60+ minutes for arrival aircraft and10.7 minutes for departure aircraft.

Figure 3C shows that the peak-period average delays to air-craft using the taxiways are 0.4 minutes for taxi-in operationsand 0.3 minutes for taxi-out operations.

Figure 3D shows that average aircraft taxi travel timesvary from 3.1 to 14.3 minutes. Peak-hour average taxi traveltimes are 5.3 minutes for arrival aircraft and 14.3 minutesfor departure aircraft.

5

- '- -AV']UM RL19W FR AM -

100 -- -- - -

.0

6 7 8 9 10 U1 12 13 14 15 16 17 1S 19 20 21Be=r B.gimAng

FGM 3B AVERAGE N2lY EEXUi

30- a -- a a a - a - a

' 1,o1 1 , 11o

,,ol Ia a a a aaiaIaa

6I

4

2

di a aI I I I I

es:: If6 -

6 7 8 9 10 1. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Bow 33 A Smo

6

F 3C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

o 4

3 .11:

(D

o =' -- a - - -- -- ---e- -

"P4

ales

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour Beginning

FIGURE 3D AVERAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TIMES

30

20"0 - a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

0

* a -~ De att -re-as a -

r0

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 19 20 21Hour Beginning

Lii

7

Experiment No. 7

Objective:

To obtain 1977 baseline delay estimates for the followingjrunway use in IFRl weather:


19L 10L, 10R



Results:

Figure 7A shows that total aircraft flows vary from 9 to53 aircraft per hour over the 7 hour simulation run. Thepeak hour is from 1000 to 1100 hours and contains 25 arrivalaircraft and 28 departure aircraft.

Figure 7B shows that average delays to aircraft using therunways are as high as 58.7 minutes per aircraft. Peak houraverage delays are 47.4 minutes for arrival aircraft and58.7 minutes for departure aircraft.



8

FI= 7A AVERMZ RON3Y FI-OW PAM

160

140

o 120 -,-, -'

1 100 10 ,

so

4

80-20

Arrivals

6 7 8 9 10 1. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Bm= Begiuning

F= 7B AVERM Y DELAYS

30Departwres I

Arrivalsi z 0 t --- t 1

'4

0

/

'

6- /

S/I

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Bo= eginning

La

9

Flom 7C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

4 -

f-rivals,

3I3 ---- ,--t- !

0 2 --- -----0 2

6-78 10 1I. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 '20 21

Hour Beginning

FJIGUR~E 7D AVERAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TIMES

w 30 11 1-

4) Departure

20

10

~2 -

0I- - - -91111

, /... ......- 30

20 /£1- --------------

• *6..

6 / S /01 21 41 61 81 02

Hour Beginning

10

JExperiment No. 8Objective:

To obtain 1977 baseline delay estimates for the following

runway use in VFR2 weather:


19L, 19R 19L, 19R



Results:





.

li

IFIU 8A AVERAGE IWR1AY FUN RAM

160 ' -

I 140

120

. oo

41 60 .-- ..

40

20 -Arv04

0

6 7 8 9 10 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour BegInning

F 8B AVEAEGE RMI X DEMS

3O c

20

0

10

a I Deparbures

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 . i7 is 19 20 21Bo= Beinning1

312

IFl 8C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

0 2-,W4

0 1 - -f

Is.'

0

-- - -- - -- - -- - - - --- --- --- --

Deperbres

4 Arrivralsl

6 7 8 9 10 1I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour Beginning

FIGURE D AVERAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TIMS

30 , m -, -,

0

2 0 a, -

4 - - - - Arri-vals-,

U, "- . . .. - " a...--. - - -o ,)

.53 - - a -01l 1 3 1 5 6 1 8 1 0

Hor egn0n

. . . . . . . . . ,. ..". . ... . . .. . ..4. . . . .

6 -1' " i ll " -"" ' .... I - .. . . l~ l

13

J Experiment No. 9Objective:

To obtain 1977 baseline delay estimates for the followingrunway use in IFR2 weather:


19L 19L, 19R


Experiment 10 estimates the impact of extending Taxiways Land V.

Results:


Figure 9B shows that average delays to aircraft using therunways are as high as 60+ minutes per aircraft. Peak houraverage delays are 36.7 minutes for arrival aircraft and60+ minutes for departure aircraft.

Figure 9C shows that the peak-period average delays to air-craft using the taxiways are 60+ minutes for taxi-in operationsand 60+ minutes for taxi-out operations.

Figure 9D shows that average aircraft taxi travel timesvary from 2.9 to 60+ minutes. Peak-hour average taxi traveltimes are 60+ minutes for arrival aircraft and 60+ minutesfor departure aircraft.

14

IFIG= 9A AVEA R W FUN( RAM

160

J 140 -120

100

60 4*

0 -

Total

20 J-- i- -- -

6 7 8 9 10 3. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Bm 3qgiming

FMIM 9B AVERAM RM&W DELAYS

Departures I

'I I

i,,Arrivils0 - a aaa"

- a a0

2

• 06 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 21

Bmw Beqinning

IFM 9C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

30 al a - a - -

9 - - ! - a - - - - - - '

>', ,,Arrivals

* 20 a a a a a.. .._ I

-LI '_ _, i ,

10

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 '20 21Hour Beginning

FIGURE 9D AVERAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TMES

*30 -a- -a

'2I

'a.' Arrivals

o- - . a a a ,

- I I.51 -- . - - - a - a a ' - - -

S10

2 A I

30 - -l I -

6 78 9 1.01112 1314 1516 171819 20 21Hour Beginning

- 9!J ,j

16

Experiment No. 10

J Objective:To estimate the impact of the extensions of Taxiways Land V.


Experiment 9 is the 1977 baseline for comparison.

Results:



Figure 10C shows that the peak-period average delays toaircraft using the taxiways are 0.0 minutes for taxi-inoperations and 0.2 minutes for taxi-out operations.


g 17I

FGMRE 10OA AVERAGE RI9Y FUN RATS

160

140

120

54100 - - - ------- --

60

6 7 8 9 10 1.1 .12 131 14 .15 16 17 18 19 20 21

~4 80 - -- - - Hem- Beginning -

FIGRE 10B AVRGE ---- EELA-4O - - - - - -

20

Arrivivs __

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Hs= BegDinnin

I I

-. 18

IFrw 10C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

-PI-

a - - -j 1 - _

I_, Arrival I6.7 8 9 101112.13 141516 17 19 20o21

Hour Beginning

FIGURE 10D AVE RAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TIMS

30 ,,

E-4

o 2

W 10

8 a

4 I Arrivals

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour Beginning

FIUE1DAEAETXWYTAE£IE

19

Experiment No. 14

Objective:

To obtain 1977 baseline delay estimates for the followingrunway use in VFRl weather:


28L, 28R IL, 28L


Experiment 13 estimates the impact of using Taxiway L as autility runway.

Results:



Figure 14C shows that the peak-period average delays toaircraft using the taxiways are 0.5 minutes for taxi-inoperations and 0.1 minutes for taxi-out operations.


20

IFM 14A AVEIVIG!LOW PU REAM

I 160 -j 140

3.20 - - - ------

k 00 -----

so

A. /- ,.. .6. 0 -o a-0

60 - -- -- - "- -

oTo

6 7 8 9 10 3.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21o megiang

IG 14B AVE RMW E LAYS

30

0

10-

6

2 2

S789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Din= 3eqinnin

1

21 fFIlM= 14C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

4 - -

3

o 24

0 2

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour Beginning


30

E-4

0

10

a 8 -. .....

"4

o ---- I I---- I

06 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 - 19 20 21HOur BeginningI

-u- L . -

Attachment B

RESULTS OF STAGE 2 AIRFIELDSIMULATION MODEL EXPERIMENTS

San Francisco International Airport

Airport Improvement Task Force Delay Studies

Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

San Francisco, California

March 1979

= ~ -7-T

14E -4 1-4 Wo -4 -4 -

I oc oc > o c o9.40

0

L) to N N N N N d.-f

CO CO0 O DC

0 2

0- 44 4- (D4

H 0

4) 4) M 0%4 4 (dQ 44 ,

E- 4-) oz400C4 0 r~E. CD CO-Om 1. 041

-4 4) 01 .I4 0 m'.0 > 1- 4 4f4g

E--4- 9-v 0I

- 41Hx

4J 0:C : 3-

00

CD ai 0

444 0)g.I

0w0.

-n W U4 v J2 0 00

00

m El ' 4C Nif tn-I eq oc

z1W4.x

m 4) 1- Nou 4 (n ' % (4 4 N~ mL O .4 N m' m~ 0 O c4- -4 4

41

) l r V fn r- % o.V- o %cnL v r- v +n c4 %D a

C: IV 4)L 1 n %S>1

EU-4

OCO C; r- ; 0 C'4 LA JOEC4 CN C C; O" r.O>2 0. q n 00%D0 N44 - i-. %D r- -- 4 r-4

+ *.44

X to

w %% - - N )N% 0% 1 N4 o0 EU EUE- 4+ -4 + 3

44 -

0. 01 EU E

U U 4 -1

>4 02 0 00: H 0

E-4 .> >4 >q >4

0 0- 04

-. 4> r x

0 P- E-4w w W -E 4. -4)000000 0 0 0 0 0 r_ r. 0-4

-4- 4 "4- , -H -,4 -1 .- H 1 - -H .- H .- I4 41 -14W --1 -4 4 4 r-I r-4r4 r-4V. -1 r-I r-02- C2 -24 r-4 .4 0-4

000

1: >)4 >>4 >>4 >4 >44>4 >4 >4 02

C4 4 ~ ed N~ to 0 eN 0 '00 N 0 N2 to to '0 C, '0 d '0a)0 0%0 0 0 O 0 00 ' 0% 0 4u

T -4 E4-4 4-4 124(-,f-42 I4 2. c~a

to r- C r'- r- Q r- r. CD r= ODi r- r- r- ODi r- r-S N % 0% C r- z"-0 m- r0% (A C 02 0% a% m- 02 m 0-

4-I4 .-4 .-4 -4 .-4 .4 -4 -1 .-4 P4 .4 -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 0

02 0

EU> I-~HW 000

01.

$ 4 fd14)>4)

141 to

to 4O N ' E(OO m d MA- ~ - ('4n I"'. 02 1 O'O4 10 1-04 z1 4-I (ra

9 25Experiment No. 19

jObjective:To obtain 1982 baseline delay estimates for the followingf runway use in VFRl weather:


28L, 28R, 1L 1L, 1R, 28L


Experiment No. 1 is the baseline case for 1977.

Results:





I

j 26

MFICE 19A AVEMM RMWY FLU AW

160

140

120

Jc otal

so

6 0- - r -v Is

20

6 7 8 9 10 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

19B AVEA IMM DEAI

30 ,10

onn

\

i

- - - --b' -

, ', -- " -- m. /

6 7 8 9 10 13.1 12 13 14 1S 16 17 18 19 20 21

mw Deginnngq

. . ...... m

27

FI 19C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

I 4 '

3

qwO 21

-4J

3~A - -- - - ->1

L-1 - - -" a --- - - .--

06 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 "20 21

Hour Beginning


m30

20

0 - - -

6 0 De9r152

6 a - a0- - a a a

4/06 7 8 9 0 01 12 13 14 15 16 17 S 1;'20 21

Hour Beginning

6~.

28

Experiment No. 20

Objective:

To obtain 1982 baseline delay estimates for the following

runway use in IFRl weather:


28R IL, 1R, 28L


Experiment 3 is the baseline case for 1977. Experiment 20Aevaluates the effects of a general aviation diversion.

Results:





o-

I

29

FMIE 20A AVERAGE M FL RATE

160 ' '--

I 140

80

-/- - -

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Be=. - =-g

20B AVERAGE BL9 DIELAYS

30

4

24 0i o -/ T al l

40 a A a a a a a a a a a a a a

a a

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Sour Begimzing-- - - - - -I iI

30I II-l I I I I l l i

30

FMGR 20C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYSI'3O

-7'- .-

20 /

* .................J..iArrivals- - / \-'; -- /

10 - - 4 -- ' -I __ / --- 4

6

2-- "- --- - -Dprw'-

6 7 8 9 10 1. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 *20 21Hour Beginning

FIGURE 20D AVERAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TIMS

30 - --

*A

-p4-

~20 -I44 \/va - -

E-4I

//0

q.10- - ~ -

4 -

67 8 9 10 12131415161718192021Hour Beginning

Io

31

IExperiment No. 20A

Objective:

To estimate the effects of diverting all general aviation

activity to other airports:


28R 1L, IR, 28L


Experiment 20 is the 1982 baseline for comparison.

Results:

Figure 20AA shows that total aircraft flows vary from 15 to62 aircraft per hour over the 15-hour simulation run. Thepeak hour is from 1100 to 1200 hours and contains 30 arrivalaircraft and 32 departure aircraft.

Figure 20AB shows that average delays to aircraft using therunways are as high as 51.7 minutes per aircraft. Peak-houraverage delays are 51.7 minutes for arrival aircraft and37.9 minutes for departure aircraft.

Figure 20AC shows that the peak-period average delays to air-craft using the taxiways are 23.9 minutes for taxi-in operationsand 9.9 minutes for taxi-out operations.

Figure 20AD shows that average aircraft taxi travel timesvary from 3.1 to 45.1 minutes. Peak-hour average taxi traveltimes are 28.9 minutes for arrival aircraft and 45.1 minutesfor departure aircraft.

4 "

32

IF (20A)A AVEPlAGE FNO FLOW M

I 160

1401-

b 100 -

%. so- -Is

80

60- - - - ----

20 t--

6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hm=i Begining

ITM (20A) B AVEP.AZ IU2aY EELM

IIin

30 -A- rivls /I

10;

6 /:

- -- - =' - 7

0-

- 10 7 - 9 10 1/21 41 61 8 1 02

-- ~~~am - - - -- 7-- ..-- -n

33

I12. (20A)C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

30

I 0

,-7-

30 -

2 0 11 1 13 45 617 1819202

AArrivals

8 / /' •

6 --- 1- - I_ \

HoerurBesnn

FJIGUR (2A t VRG AIWYTAE I~

Z 10 ' \ , / \AAivriv/als

0 ---

4\ /

0 77 D

0 7 8 - 101 21 41 1- 1 1 1 00 m " m m m \

Hour Beginning

Lk

34

IExperiment No. 21

Objective:

To obtain 1982 baseline delay estimates for the followingrunway use in IFRI weather:


28R 28L


Experiment 5 is the baseline case for 1977.

Results:

Figure 21A shows that total, aircraft flows vary from 21 to74 aircraft per hour over the 15-hour simulation run. Thepeak hour is from 0900 to 1000 hours and contains 23 arrivalaircraft and 51 departure aircraft.




LA

35

FI 2 1A AVERAG l1WUWW FIO RA=S

160

140120

S. 1000

40

20 80 -

S. - . -- -

0Sr

6 0 - -- -_,

820 '

o20

20 , -

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1.5 16 17 18 19 20 21.am seginning

2.

/ I/

2J-- . a - - a - a a a -

II. .... .4. a°a'I 7 8-. . ... 10I 1I 11213II 141 16 17 8I II9 20 21 I ...

36

IF771 21C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

4i

3 ,

0 2--0

S1 a a a -

6 7 8 9 10 ii 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour Beginning

FIGURE 21D AVERAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TIMS

30

E

* 20

4

~10

x 78

Sour Beginning

[i

37

IExperiment No. 22

Objective:

To obtain 1982 baseline delay estimates for the followingrunway use in VFR1 weather:


19L, 19R 10L, 10R, 19R



Results:


Figure 22B shows that average delays to aircraft using therunways are as high as 5.4 minutes per aircraft. Peak-houraverage delays are 1.9 minutes for arrival aircraft and5.4 minutes for departure aircraft.

Figure 22C shows that the peak-period average delays to air-craft using the taxiways are 0.4 minutes for taxi-in operationsand 0.4 minutes for taxi-out cperations.


q

i-.

.. ... 1 flI1 1 . .. . .I I i ". . .. .. . I I . . . .. . .I

38

FMMMM 22A AVERAGE REDA FLN RA=

160

140

i00

80 Tota

20 ---

40

Arrival

6 7 8 9 20 01 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Be= Begiming

F31E 22B AVfERAE RONPW CXE

30

- lo -m

0 -"- - '-- ----------------...0

".prures--

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hot= Be giing

39

IFSO 22C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

4i

3

C 4

0 2 -

.

Departures Arrivals

Hour Beginning

FIGURE 2 2D AVERAGE TAXIWAY TRAVEL TIMES

8I

0

.

2

0

0

2 -- Arrivals- ,.-- - -0 i I I6 7 8 9 10 1U 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Hour Beginning

40

Experiment No. 23

Objective:

To obtain 1982 baseline delay estimates for the followingrunway use in IFR2 weather:


19L 19L, 19R



Results:


Figure 23B shows that average delays to aircraft using therunways are as high as 60+ minutes per aircraft. Peak-houraverage delays are 25.4 minutes for arrival aircraft and60+ minutes for departure aircraft.

Figure 23C shows that the peak-period average delays to air-craft using the taxiways are 28.3 minutes for taxi-in operationsand 60+ minutes for taxi-out operations.

Figure 23D shows that average aircraft taxi travel timesvary from 3.2 to 60+ minutes. Peak-hour average taxi traveltimes are 4.4 minutes for arrival aircraft and 60+ minutesfor departure aircraft.

41

IFMGR 23A AVWZ IW FUN PAM

160 ,

140 - -a- - -

~120- ---- - -

ii 100- - -

60

40 / - a

20- Arrivals

20 1 1'-" aaA a

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

FIG= 23B AVEMM FItY DLAM

/Departures

• . ./i Arriv'als

10/ "/

6 /,

- T

2 106 9 10 11 L2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

- !.. a a.. . . " -- • . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . b l ' . .. . . . . . n . .. . . .. . .. .. d o l. r . .. .. .. I Il inIi

j 42I

F3 23C AVERAGE TAXIWAY DELAYS

4-

Departures I

3I

11 Arrivals

0 2i

3..

- -7

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour Beginning


o Departures

20 /

IE

-* -, - -10S8 -

6 -- Arrivals-

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Hour Beginning

Date post:	24-Oct-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times

MARWICK MITCMELL AND CO SAN FRANCISCO CALIF SAN …Re: San Francisco Data Package No. 4 Dear Mike:...

Documents