+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

Date post: 05-Oct-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 14 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
50
SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © 2015 17 th October 2018 Materials for HPHT Applications 1 Current Issues & Future Solutions Narasi Sridhar and Ramgopal Thodla
Transcript
Page 1: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENERDNV GL © 2015

17th October 2018

Materials for HPHT Applications

1

Current Issues & Future Solutions

Narasi Sridhar and Ramgopal Thodla

Page 2: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

2

>10 km

Page 3: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

API 17TR8: HPHT Design Guidelines for Subsea Applications

3

Page 4: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

API 17TR8: HPHT Design for Subsea Applications

▪ HPHT design is a significant new challenge

facing the subsea sector, particularly in the

Gulf of Mexico

▪ API 17TR8 provides HPHT Design

Guidelines, specifically for subsea

applications

▪ First Edition issued February 2015

▪ Second Edition released in 2018

4

Page 5: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

API 17TR8: HPHT Design for Subsea Applications

5

▪ Subsea HPHT design challenges

– T > 350°F

– P > 15ksi

– Harsh environmental conditions

– Sour production

– High H2S/Elemental S

– High Cl-

– Seawater with CP

– Low T (40°F)

– Also elevated T?

– Design approach

– Stress based vs. Fracture mechanics

– Failure modes

– Fracture

– Fatigue/EAC

Page 6: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Materials Focus

6

▪ Subsea materials typically high strength steels

▪ But elevated T and P generally requires use of high strength nickel based alloys

and/or clad material

▪ Modification of design philosophy (Fracture mechanics vs. Stress based)

– Environmentally assisted fracture & fatigue become critical in design

▪ Testing required to characterize environmentally assisted cracking behavior

– SSR

– Fracture toughness

– Fatigue (FCGR / S-N)

▪ Operating conditions

– HPHT

▪ Shut in conditions

– Seawater + CP at low T

Page 7: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

API 17TR8: HPHT Design for Subsea Applications

7

▪ Annex D: Material Characterization Protocols

– New in Second Edition

– Guidelines for use of metallic materials (low

alloy steels and CRAs) for HPHT applications

– Generating material properties suitable for

the application of fracture mechanics based

approaches to the design of subsea

equipment

Page 8: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

ISO 15156/MR-01-75 Limits

8

How to specify limit regions of application?

Page 9: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Overall Framework to Understand Environmentally Assisted Cracking

9

Page 10: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

10

Environmentally Assisted Cracking Regimes of CRA’s

pH

Pote

ntial

221 HeH

OH4e4OH2O 22

DepassivationpH

SSC

SSC requires H generated by corrosion – for CRA this will happen only below depassivation pH

HSCHSC requires galvanic coupling with steel and certain microstructural conditions (e.g., aging, strength, etc.)

SCC

SCC controlled by local anodic dissolution, stress, microstructure.Focus of JIP

SCC

SCC controlled by local anodic dissolution, stress, microstructure

Page 11: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

A concept for conditions leading to SCC

11

Time (Environmental Variables)

Para

mete

rs Corrosion Potential

Strain Rate

Critical Potential

Onset of SCC

Onset of Pitting/Crevice

Just three parameters drive the SCC of CRA’s

Uncertainties in these parameters lead to risk

Critical

strain

rate

Page 12: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Loading Effects

12

Page 13: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

MTD Fatigue and Fracture Capabilities

Servo Electric Frames 2250 – 4500 kgf (5,000 – 20,000 lbf capacity)

− FCGR, Smooth SN, and SSR 0.1 – 35 MPa (14.7 – 5,000 psia) @ -

40 to 220°C

Servo Hydraulic Frames 5,000 – 50,000 kgf (11,000 – 110,000 lbf

capacity)

13

Page 14: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Typical Operating Conditions

14

Pressu

re

Tem

peratu

re

5ksi/10ksi/20ksi

Ambient

100°F/250°F/400F

Time

20 – 50 days

~a few days

~10’s min to hours

– Flow lines

– Fatigue loading from pressure/thermal transients (~hours)

– Static loading associated with long steady operations

(~months)

– Risers

– Wave motion & Vortex Induced Vibration (VIV)

Page 15: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Design Considerations

15

Time

Load

Ambient/Seabed Temperatures

20 – 50 days

Design PhilosophyNo CGR K<Kth

FCGR- Low frequency

- Wave frequency

Exposure - Sour Environments (H2S/CO2 containing)

- Seawater + CP

~a few

days

~10’s min to hours

Page 16: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Effect of frequency and R-ratio (718)

16

Page 17: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

SCC of CRA in Sour Service

17

Page 18: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

CRA JIP - Major Results of Phase 1

▪ The concept that SCC occurs only above the repassivation potential for

localized corrosion was validated for CRA’s

▪ Crack growth rate tests were shown to be more reliable than SSRT and

C-ring tests

▪ The localized corrosion susceptibility of CRA’s in sour environments was

successfully modelled

▪ A predictive model for CRA’’s in sour environments was developed in

collaboration with OLI Systems

18

Page 19: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

CRA JIP - Phase II Ongoing

19

▪ a

• Validation of Erp Prediction and its Correlation with SCC Task1

• Rapid Performance Evaluation with Rising Displacement TestsTask 2

• CGR Tests to Explore Environmental Limits Task 3

• Guidelines for Performing Rising Displacement Tests to Evaluate CRA’s in Sour Environment

Task 4

• OLI Model CompletionTask 5

Page 20: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Status of Phase II Results

▪ The results from rising displacement tests clearly showed the difference

in the material performance as a function of H2S partial pressure

– The impact of other environmental variables can be explored

– The benefit of the rising displacement tests is that the tests can be

done fairly quickly compared to the CGR tests

– However, we should be cautious in using the da/dt results to judge the

service life of the material

▪ Changing conditions in the CGR can result crack stalling without careful

management of the crack growth

– It seems that dynamic strain is necessary to sustain the crack growth

for S13Cr

– More efforts are being carried to established a sound way to change

conditions in the CGR test to evaluate the CGR as a function of the

environmental variables

Page 21: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Effect of Metallurgy - 718

21

Page 22: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Metallurgy of 718

22

Carbides: (Nb,Ti)C - Cubic

’: Ni3(Al,Ti) – Ordered FCC

”: Ni3(Nb,Al,Ti) – Ordered BCT

: Ni3(Nb8Ti2) - Orthorhombic

API – 120K

Solutionize

API – 150K

DNV GL Log ID Solutionizing Aging

2276 1030C/1.5h/WQ 780C/7h/AC

2624 1030C/1.5h/WQ 718C/8h + 621C/8h/AC

Heat Treatment

DNV GL Log ID Ni Fe Cr Nb+Ta Mo Ti Al Co Cu C

2276 (120K) 53 18.72 18.4 4.91 2.88 0.98 0.44 0.21 0.07 0.022

2624 (150K) 53.1 18.2 18.5 5.08 3.04 0.95 0.55 0.31 0.04 0.016

Chemical Analysis (wt%)

A range of HT conditions in the API Spec can produce varying

strength/microstructure

Page 23: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Crack Propagation

23

120 ksi 150 ksi

Crack morphology is IG in 120K and TG in the 150K

Page 24: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Microstructure

24

150 ksi

120 ksi

120 ksi

150 ksi

phase is evident in 120K along the

boundaries, no significant along the

150K boundaries

Page 25: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Nature of ” Precipitates

25

120 ksi 150 ksi

Is size the fundamental parameter of importance in H

embrittlement?

Page 26: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Effect of Applied Potential - 718

27

▪ CGR is a strong function

of applied potential

▪ No significant difference

between 120K vs 150K

under constant K

conditions.

▪ Low stable CGR is

observed at applied

potentials in the range of

-950mV to -850mV SCE.

-1200 -1100 -1000 -900 -800

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5 718 - 150ksi (2624)

718 - 120ksi (2276)

718 - 120ksi (2276)

718 - 120ksi (2948)

718 - 140ksi - AM (2988)

CG

R (

mm

/s)

Potential (mV SCE)

3.5wt% NaCl

pH = 8.2

40F

K = 90ksiin

Page 27: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Is this behavior unique to 718?

28

Page 28: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Effect of K on CGR – Characteristics Needed for Design

29

CGR behavior of different alloys systems is significant different –

718 appears to be the most resistant 725 is the most susceptible

Page 29: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Key Questions to Address

▪Does the specimen size have an effect on the

measured CGR?

– i.e. at the same nominal K value does the effect of specimen

size effect the measured CGR?

▪What is the effect of specimen size on the

measured Kth?

– Are rising displacement tests affected by specimen size?

–Does the Kth decrease with decreasing specimen size due to

increased plasticity which might promote H embrittlement?

– If so, what is the right specimen size to use?

Page 30: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Performance Assessment of Sub-sea Bolts

31

Page 31: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Background

▪ Low Alloy Ferritic Steels are commonly used for bolting applications

▪ Currently the steels are specified based on hardness limits (34HRC) for H

embrittlement resistance.

– This limits the YS to about 105ksi

– Different standards have different limitations on the HRC and YS requirements

▪ Low alloy steels in general are susceptible to H embrittlement.

– Function of YS

– Microstructure

– H concentration

▪ Hydrogen in the steels could be from multiple sources

– Plating processes in particular electrolytic processes

– Hydrogen from seawater + CP

32

Page 32: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Issues involved

▪ Uncertainties in field conditions

▪ Uncertainties in lab test data

– Effect of test methodology on measured results

33

Page 33: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Analysis of field failures (BSEE, others)

▪ Failure probabilities are skewed

– Not all failures and near failures are historically reported

– Failure analyses focus mostly on failed bolts and not on intact bolts

34

Hardness Failure fraction

28-32 0.29

33-38 0.44

39-42 0.92

>43 1.0

Page 34: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Test Methods to Evaluate Cracking Susceptibility

35

Rising Displacement Tests

• Sensitive to rate typically take 4-10days

• Increasing K

• Identify crack initiation

• Measure CGR

Constant Load Tests

• Duration (1month to 1 year)

• Identify cracking/no cracking

(Constant K)

• Can measure CGR

DCB/WOL

• Duration (1month to 1 year)

• Identify crack arrest (Decreasing K)

• Can measure CGRa K

t

Page 35: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

10-3 10-2 10-1 100

1

10

K = 20ksiin (692Nmm-3/2)

R = 0.5

RT

Production Environment

NaCl:74.196g/L

NaHCO3: 0.13g/L

pH2S = 0.21psia

Inh: 40ppm (EC1304A)

RT

Production Environment

PP As Fabricated

PP Intrados

PP Intrados - No H2S

FC

GR

en

v/F

CG

Rin

-air

f (Hz)

FCGR Behavior

FCGR is a strong function of frequency in sour environments.

Yu, Weiwei, et al.CORROSION 2017,

2017. NACE International.

Page 36: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Fracture Toughness in Environment

▪ Decreasing K-rate results in decreasing toughness.

▪ No significant difference in initiation toughness lower than a K-rate of 0.16Nmm-

3/2/s however, the slope of the R-curve continues to decrease at the lower rate

37

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.00

200

400

600

800

K-rate - 1.6Nmm-3/2

/s

K-rate - 0.16Nmm-3/2

/s

K-rate - 0.05Nmm-3/2

/s

K-rate - 0.05Nmm-3/2

/s

K-rate - 0.05Nmm-3/2

/s

J (

N/m

m)

a (mm)

5wt% NaCl

pH = 5

pH2S

= 0.46psia

Page 37: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Variability in embrittlement susceptibility (laboratory data)

38

Depending on the test technique, significant variability in lab test results

versus hardness

Page 38: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Preliminary Data – Effect of Applied Potential

39

Cracking of LAS is a strong function

of H concentration

• Measurement of quantitative

parameters to characterize

differences due to applied potential?

• CGR is proposed as a quantitative

measure for susceptibility

The H concentration in LAS

is a strong function of

microstructure and applied

cathodic potential

Page 39: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Role of Applied Potential – Cyclic load vs. Static Loading (LAS)

40

Page 40: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Effect of material strength

41

Page 41: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Uncertainties in lab data - 718

42

Page 42: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Testing methodology issues

▪ Rising displacement test provides quick answers but is too conservative for

design. It also does not provide a reasonable measure of crack growth rate (CGR)

▪ Pseudo-static tests (low frequencies with long hold times but R=0.6) provide

more realistic CGR but take a lot of time to generate sufficient data

– Tests with higher R ratios can stall and create uncertainty in prediction

▪ Cyclic loading test at moderate R-ratios (R = 0.2 to 0.6) and 0.1mHz provide

slightly higher CGR, but take shorter time

– There is insufficient data to extrapolate from low frequency cyclic tests to

pseudo-static tests

– Materials such as 718 may be ok due to planar deformation mode; Low alloy

steels may be more sensitive

43

Page 43: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Probabilistic prediction

44

Page 44: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Probabilistic approach based on analytical model (Gangloff model)

▪ Assume an analytical expression for CGR as a function of K and fit experimental data at

each applied potential to derive model parameters. Use Monte Carlo method to derive

distribution

▪ Calculate effective K for bolts under remote loading and assumed initial flaw size and

pre-load distributions

▪ Assume external CP is the same as at the thread roots

45

Gangloff, Corrosion, 72(7), 2016

Page 45: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Example calculation using Gangloff ScCrack Model

46

• CGR data taken from

DNVGL data (145 ksi

steel)

• Initial crack size

randomized around 1

mm

• Applied CP: -1050 to -

900 mV SCE

Page 46: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Alloy 718 CGR probability calculation (using DNVGL data)

47

• Sensitivity analysis showing pre-load has

the biggest effect (among modelled

variables)

• Probability distribution of CGR

Page 47: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Potential distribution within crevices

▪ Turnbull and May (1983) did measurements of crevice potentials in 3.5% NaCl and artificial

seawater on steels. They did not see a major difference in CP levels in crevice vs. outside down

to -1050 mV vs. SCE.

– As long as seawater can penetrate, CP will penetrate

– Calcareous deposits may influence CP penetration depending on porosity and tortuosity (but it

is likely to influence only how fast CP propagates)

▪ Modeling can be done in various crevices using commercial finite element codes

– Beasy does steady-state model assuming constant conductivity throughout crevice area and

unchanging with time

– COMSOL does transient model and can vary conductivity within crevices and with time

48

Page 48: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Discussion points

▪ Laboratory CGR data can be used to generate probability curves for crack growth

– Need more data to improve fit equations

– Faster CGR data generation methods should be used to correlate to SCGR data

to increase data throughput

▪ Probabilistic modelling can be used identify most sensitive parameters and

prioritize data needs

▪ Modeling of CP distribution inside tight crevices in bolts can be performed using

commercial FEA codes

– Assumptions about conductivity can be made

– Conductivity can be calculated to include calcareous deposits

49

Page 49: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

Summary

▪ A framework is available to predict the performance of CRA in HPHT applications

– Significant data needs exist, but are being developed

– Understanding test method effects and being able to extrapolate to long-term

performance are needed

▪ Strength/hardness is NOT the sole factor in determining environmentally assisted

cracking

– Microstructural characteristics are important

– As new alloys/manufacturing methods are developed, existing hardness specs

may not be adequate

▪ Probabilistic framework helps in assembling diverse dataset and making decisions

under uncertainty

50

Page 50: Materials for HPHT Applications - DNV

DNV GL © 2015 17 August 2017

SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

www.dnvgl.com

Thank you

Questions?

51

Ramgopal Thodla

[email protected]


Recommended