Matthew Ayre (project manager)Hyan Choi (lead consultant)

Solar Panel Team

Why??In order to save electricuty (bills)Reduce effect of business on the

environmentProve that the technology for such a

venture exists

Concept Overview

Solar Panel FeasibilityThere must be enough power to allow the

network of PCs to function correctlyThis will be made possible by the other

energy source and the low power usage PCs

The installation and after must not cause serious harm to anyone

Schedule

Side viewThis diagram show

how we had planned to attach the panel

It shows the railsBoltsAnd subsequently

where we had to drill holes

Test Results

Time 6:30AM

Sunset(7:00AM)

9:00AM

11:00AM

Noon (12:00 PM)

1:00PM

3:00PM

5:00PM

Sundown(5:30PM)

7:00 PM

Output

Weather Condition: SunnyTable 1 Solar panel output result

Solar Panel Test

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Sunse

t 6:3

0AM

7:00

AM

9:00

AM

11:0

0AM

Noon

12:0

0PM

1:00

PM

3:00

PM

5:00

PM

Sundo

wn 5:

30PM

7:00

PM

Time

Vo

lta

ge

How the implementation went

Project ame: Renewable Energy SystemPrepared by: Matthew AyreDate : 21 May 08Control o. (from CR Log): 114548

PROJECT CHANGE REQUEST FORM

1. Requestor InformationArea of Change:

Scope [ ]

Schedule

[ ]

Budget [ ]

Quality [ X ]

Is this Change the result of a Risk Management Action? o [

X ]

Yes [ ] Ri

sk I

D:

Proposed Change Description and References:Description: The U shaped brackets being used to mount the frame to the rails on the

roof, four are required of the 40mm variety. Currently we have 2x40mm and 2x50m U shaped bracket.

Justification: Spending a small amount of money will ensure there are no injuries created by the solar panel falling as well as that the panel is positioned at a good angle to maximize energy output.

Impact of Not implementing Proposed Change:

If this is not done it may impact the strength and tightness of the mounts fit to the rail and either cause serious injury from falling or reduce energy output because of the angle it faces.

Alternatives: Use the given four brackets of different sizes and “hope for the best”. This is NOT advised mainly for safety reasons.

2. Initial Review Results of the Change RequestInitial Review Date: 21 May 08 Assigned to: Hyun

Action CommentsApprove for Impact

Analysis[ ]

Reject [ ]Defer Until [ ]

Express Approval [ X ] This is defiantly a good change and safe as well I will approve immediately

3. Initial Impact AnalysisBaselines Affected: More power generated as a resultConfiguration Items Affected (e.g. product specifications):

N/A

Cost / Schedule Impact Analysis Required? (check one) Yes [ X ] o [ ]Impact on Cost: $19.90Impact on Schedule: 1 week (due to waiting for part to arrive)Impact on Resources: Efficiency (increased output of solar panel)Risk associated with implementing the change:

N/A

Risk associated with not implementing the change:

Panel falling and injuring someone or breakage of panel itself

Final Review Results: Safety and energy output increased – positive changeReview Date: 28 May 08Priority: High [ ] Medium [ X ] Low [ ]

5. Final Recommendation

Allow requested change

6. Project Change Request Form / SignaturesProject ame: Renewable Energy SystemProject Manager: MattI have reviewed the information contained in this Project Change Request Form and agree:

ame Title Signature Date(MM/DD/YYYY)

Matthew Ayre Project Manager 28 May 08Hyun CHOI Consultant 28 May 08