+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > MDT conference case

MDT conference case

Date post: 14-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: imrana-tanvir
View: 110 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
54
CASE PRESENTATION Thanks to DR. BABAR YASIN MEDICAL OFFICER HISTOPATHOLOGY for the preparation of this presentation
Transcript
Page 1: MDT conference case

CASE PRESENTATION

Thanks to DR. BABAR YASINMEDICAL OFFICERHISTOPATHOLOGY for the preparation of this presentation

Page 2: MDT conference case

CASE 1

Page 3: MDT conference case

LEFT BREAST CORE BIOPSY

Page 4: MDT conference case
Page 5: MDT conference case

INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA, GRADE IINO LYMPHO VASCULAR INVASION SEEN

Page 6: MDT conference case

RIGHT BREAST, CORE BIOSPY

Page 7: MDT conference case
Page 8: MDT conference case

INVASIVE MAMMARY CARCINOMA FOVOUR INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA, GRADE II

NO LYMPHOVASCULAR INVASION SEEN

Page 9: MDT conference case

Histologic Grade (Nottingham Histologic Score)

  Glandular (Acinar)/Tubular Differentiation Score 1 (>75% of tumor area forming glandular/tubular structures) Score 2 (10% to 75% of tumor area forming glandular/tubular structures) Score 3 (<10% of tumor area forming glandular/tubular structures)  Nuclear Pleomorphism Score 1 (nuclei small with little increase in size in comparison with normal breast

epithelial cells, regular outlines, uniform nuclear chromatin, little variation in size) Score 2 (cells larger than normal with open vesicular nuclei, visible nucleoli, and

moderate variability in both size and shape) Score 3 (vesicular nuclei, often with prominent nucleoli, exhibiting marked variation

in size and shape, occasionally with very large and bizarre forms)  Mitotic Rate Score 1 (≤3 mitoses per mm2) Score 2 (4-7 mitoses per mm2) Score 3 (≥8 mitoses per mm2)

Page 10: MDT conference case

Overall Grade Grade 1 (scores of 3, 4, or 5) Grade 2 (scores of 6 or 7) Grade 3 (scores of 8 or 9)

Page 11: MDT conference case

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL FEATURES

It is recommended that hormone receptor and HER2 testing be done on all primary invasive breast carcinomas and on recurrent or metastatic tumors.

If hormone receptors and HER2 are both negative on a core biopsy, repeat testing on a subsequent specimen should be considered, particularly when the results are discordant with the histopathologic findings.

Other biomarker tests (eg, Ki-67 or multigene expression assays) are optional.

Page 12: MDT conference case

ER & PRProportion Score

Positive Cells, %

Intensity Intensity Score

0 0 None 0

1 <1 Weak 1

2 1 to 10 Intermediate 2

3 11 to 33 Strong 3

4 34 to 66  

5 ≥67

The Allred score combines the percentage of positive cells and the intensity of the reaction product in most of the carcinoma. The 2 scores are added together

for a final score with 8 possible values.

Page 13: MDT conference case

HER2Result Criteria

Negative (Score 0)

No staining observed

Negative (Score 1+)

Incomplete, faint/barely perceptible membrane staining in >10% of invasive tumor cells

Equivocal (Score 2+)

Incomplete and/or weak to moderate circumferential membrane staining in >10% of invasive tumor cellsor Complete, intense, circumferential membrane staining in ≤10% of invasive tumor cells

Positive (Score 3+)

Complete, intense, circumferential membrane staining in >10% of invasive tumor cells

Page 14: MDT conference case

Ki-67 Testing The percentage of Ki-67 positive tumor cells determined by

IHC is often used to stratify patients into good and poor prognostic groups.

( leading edge, hot spots, overall average).

Page 15: MDT conference case

LEFT BREAST, CORE BIOPSY,ER

Page 16: MDT conference case

PR

Page 17: MDT conference case

HER 2

Page 18: MDT conference case

Ki67

Page 19: MDT conference case

RIGHT BREAST, CORE BIOPSYER

Page 20: MDT conference case

PR

Page 21: MDT conference case

HER2

Page 22: MDT conference case

Ki67

Page 23: MDT conference case
Page 24: MDT conference case

Luminal A- ER-positive/ PR-positive- HER2-negative- Low Ki67

Luminal B- ER-positive/ PR-positive- HER2-positive (or HER2-negative with high Ki67)

Triple negative/basal-like- ER-negative- PR-negative- HER2-negative

HER2 type- ER-negative- PR-negative- HER2-positive

Page 25: MDT conference case

Synchronous Bilateral Breast Carcinoma

Synchronous bilateral breast cancer is uncommon (incidence ranges between 0.3% and 12%.) but its incidence is likely to rise.

This wide range is in part due to the many definitions. Some physicians consider a contralateral cancer diagnosed within 1 year as a synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Others narrow the definition of synchronous bilateral breast cancers to those cancers which are diagnosed within 3 months of each other.

In general, patients with SBBC tend to have a worse prognosis.

Page 26: MDT conference case
Page 27: MDT conference case
Page 28: MDT conference case
Page 29: MDT conference case

Tumor Size

Important prognostic factor.

The single greatest dimension of the largest invasive carcinoma is used to determine T classification.

The best size for AJCC T classification should use information from imaging, gross examination, and microscopic evaluation.

Visual determination of size is often unreliable (carcinomas

often blend into adjacent fibrous tissue). The size by palpation of a hard mass correlates better with invasion of tumor cells into stroma with a desmoplastic response.

Page 30: MDT conference case
Page 31: MDT conference case

MARGIN EVALUATION

The specimen should be oriented in order for the pathologist to identify specific margins.

Sutures, Clips (Communication between surgeon & pathologist)

A positive margin requires ink on carcinoma.

Page 32: MDT conference case

Lymph Node Sampling and Reporting

Types of lymph nodes. Gross findings & sampling. Size of metastases- Isolated tumor cell clusters (ITCs) - Micrometastases- Macrometastases

Page 33: MDT conference case
Page 34: MDT conference case

GROSS FINDINDS LEFT MASTECTOMY Tumor bed size 3.2 x 2.4 x 2.2 cm 3 cm from nearest postero-inferior margin 4.5 cm from deep resection margin Multiple lymph nodes in axillary fat

Page 35: MDT conference case
Page 36: MDT conference case
Page 37: MDT conference case
Page 38: MDT conference case
Page 39: MDT conference case
Page 40: MDT conference case
Page 41: MDT conference case
Page 42: MDT conference case
Page 43: MDT conference case

OPINION Mucinous Adenocarcinoma MILLER PAYNE grade 3 Skin & Resection margins free of tumor 6 / 22 LNs, Positive for metastatic carcinoma Size of the largest metastatic deposit 0.5 cm

Page 44: MDT conference case

GROSS FINDINGS,RIGHT BREAST LUMPECTOMY AND AXILLARY CONTENT

Tumor bed measures 3.3 x 2.4 x 2.0cm 0.1 cm from medial resection margin 3 cm from lateral resection margin 1.0 cm from superior resection margin 1.5 cm inferior resection margin 1.2 cm from deep resection margin 0.8 cm anterior resection margin

Multiple lymph nodes in axillary fat

Page 45: MDT conference case
Page 46: MDT conference case
Page 47: MDT conference case
Page 48: MDT conference case
Page 49: MDT conference case
Page 50: MDT conference case

OPINION

INVASIVE LOBULAR CARCINOMA, 3.3 CM ASSOCIATED LOBULAR CARCINOMA IN SITU TUMOR EXTENDS UPTO THE MEDIAL RESECTION

MARGIN MILLER PAYENE GRADE 3 PERI NEURAL INVASION SEEN

Page 51: MDT conference case

Miller-Payne System Grade 1 No change or some alteration to individual malignant cells, but no

reduction in overall cellularity

Grade 2 A minor loss of tumor cells, but overall cellularity still high; up to 30% loss

Grade 3 Between an estimated 30% and 90% reduction in tumor cells

Grade 4 A marked disappearance of tumor cells such that only small clusters or widely dispersed individual cells remain; 90% loss of tumor cells

Grade 5 No malignant cells identifiable in sections from the site of the tumor; only vascular fibroelastotic stroma remains, often containing macrophages; however, ductal carcinoma in situmay be present.

Page 52: MDT conference case

CAP Treatment Effect: Response to Presurgical (Neoadjuvant) Therapy   In the Breast No known presurgical therapy No definite response to presurgical therapy in the invasive carcinoma Probable or definite response to presurgical therapy in the invasive carcinoma No residual invasive carcinoma is present in the breast after presurgical

therapy   In the Lymph Nodes No known presurgical therapy No lymph nodes removed No definite response to presurgical therapy in metastatic carcinoma Probable or definite response to presurgical therapy in metastatic carcinoma No lymph node metastases. Fibrous scarring, possibly related to prior lymph

node metastases with pathologic complete response No lymph node metastases and no prominent fibrous scarring in the nodes

Page 53: MDT conference case

Completion surgery specimen 31-03-2016

Specimen with overlying skin and Nipple Areola comples A grey white area measuring 2.5x 2.0x 1.0 cm.

Opinion:- FIBROSIS, CHRONIC INFLAMMATION & GIANT CELL

RESPONSE- NO RESIDUAL TUMOR SEEN

Page 54: MDT conference case

Recommended