+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: jackie-yip
View: 226 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 59

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    1/59

    1

    Lecture Slides

    ME 3230 Kinematics and Mechatronics

    Chapter 6 Planar Linkage Design

    By Dr. Debao Zhou

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    2/59

    2

    Scope: Design/SynthesisWe are about to begin the study of the means and

    method to design ( create ) linkages 4-bar linkage Slide-crank and its inversion Other mechanisms

    Find joint locations and link length Based on the following constraints

    Motion generation Function generation

    Methods Graphical approach Analytical approach

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    3/59

    3

    Design Goals: Find joint locations and link length basedon design requirements

    Motion Generation coupler as a wholefollows a desiredtrajectory

    Function Generation Input / output

    relationship

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    4/59

    44

    Review: 4-bar linkage - Grashof Law The fundamental 4-bar linkage design law:

    s + l < p + q s is the shortest link, l is the longest link, p and q are the other two

    links

    This inequality must be true, if continuous relative motion exists between any 2 links.

    Grashof linkages Type 1: the inequality holds

    We state that these linkages (type 1) have two joints that performcomplete (360 ) rotation and they are located at either end of the

    shortest link Nomenclature: Fixed link, Turning Links and Coupler

    Type 2: the inequality is not held They have no fully rotating joints, all 4 joints oscillate between limits May not be able to assemble

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    5/59

    55

    Review: Grashof Type 1 Mechanisms:

    s is connected to thebase (a, b) this is acrank rocker

    s is the base link (c) this is double crankor drag-linemechanism

    s is the coupler link this is a double

    rocker where thecoupler can performa complete rotationrelative to the base

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    6/59

    Some concepts The coupler - moving plane

    Moving Pivots : End points (or any point) on the chosen line-segment selected as joints

    Circle point = moving pivot

    Fixed Pivot : is located at thecenter of the circle on whichall three equivalent points onthe moving coupler line lie

    A1, A2, A3 which are the samemoving center at the 3locations

    Center point = fixed pivot

    Pole : P ij 6

    Ai

    Bi

    B j

    A j

    P ij

    Bisector line

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    7/59

    7

    4-bar Linkage Design: 2 crank positions Two fixed pivots, one

    moving pivot (one length) Or start with a known base

    length (O 2 to O 4) and thelength of the Output Link(O 4B)

    We desire that themechanisms 2 rockers bein precisely two locations(at some time) they areseparated by the angle with respect to link 2 and

    wrt Link 4

    B1

    B2

    O 4O 2

    A1 A2

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    8/59

    8

    Graphical Method To solve, lay out 2 points

    (O2

    O4)

    From O 2 strike two lineseparated by

    From O4 strike Output Link(O4B) at two positionsseparated by

    Then strike a line from O 2 to B 2 about O 2 by - (theinversion!)

    Connect B 1 and B 2 Form a perpendicular

    bisector to this line Where it strikes O 2 A1 line

    locates A 1 Sets Link 2 Length and a

    line from A 1 to B 1 establishes Coupler length

    B1

    B2

    O 4O 2

    A1 A2

    B*

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    9/59

    9

    Analytical Method

    1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2

    1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2

    2 2 2 2

    3

    2 2 2 2

    2 2

    2 1 1 4 1 2 1 1 4 1

    2

    2 2 1 4 2 2 2 1

    The distance between A & B is:

    r

    substituting from earlier:

    r r

    r r

    A B A B A B A B

    A B A B A B A B

    x x y y x x y y

    x x y y x x y y

    Cos r r Cos Sin r r Sin

    Cos r r Cos Sin r

    2

    4 2r Sin

    22113

    12

    12

    32

    11

    41

    :Equations

    , :Unkown, :Given

    ,,, :Given

    B A B Ar

    r r

    r r

    r 1

    r 4

    B2

    B1

    A1 A2

    O 4

    O 2

    1

    1

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    10/59

    10

    2-Position Design Analytical Methods

    1 4 2 12

    4 1 1 1 2 1 4 2 2

    2 2

    3 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 1 4 1

    2 2

    2 2 1 4 2 2 2 1 4 2

    :

    os

    os

    r r Cos Cosr

    r Cos r Cos Cos r Cos

    now

    r r C r r Cos r Sin r r Sin

    r C r r Cos r Sin r r Sin

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    11/59

    11

    Motion Generation: 2-Position Coupler

    Moving pivots as A/B or A/C:

    Construct perpendicular bisectors for each (or any 2)pairs of points on the coupler

    Crank Pivots can be placed

    anywhere along them onealong As perpendicular Bisector and one along Bs (Cs)perpendicular Bisector : isocelestriangle

    Notice, If the Perpendicular Bisectors are extended far enough they will intersect at thesingle pivot position theDisplacement pole P 12 (wecould build a 3-bar solution!)

    Bisectors is constructed usingonly the moving pivots

    B1

    B2

    O 4O 2

    A1

    A2

    Bisector line

    O 2 A1B1O 4O 2 A2B2O 4

    B1

    A1

    C 1

    A2

    B2

    C 2

    O 2

    O 4

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    12/59

    12

    Motion Generation: 3-Position Coupler Task: Finding fixed pivot and length of

    each link

    1. Moving Pivots: Points A, B We find these points at

    the intersection of thePerpendicular Bisectors of each moving pivot takenin pairs

    The Crank(s) are drawnfor the Fixed Pivot to the

    1st

    pose of the movingPivot

    2. Moving Pivot: Pointsother than A, B, such aspoints C, D.

    O 2

    O 4

    A1

    B1 A2 B2

    A3

    B3

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    13/59

    13

    Motion Generation: 3-Position Coupler: After Design

    Check Grashof Criteria for type

    s =1.131 (Base) (Checkactual values)

    l = 3.708 (Crank 1) p = 1.75 (coupler), q = 2.785

    (Crank 2)

    This is a Type II device notcapable of full rotation(p+q

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    14/59

    14

    Motion Generation: 3-Position Coupler

    3: nominated fixed pivots One of points A, B is not moving pivot Using Nominated Fixed Pivots to

    define moving pivot It relies on Apparent rather than

    true positions that lie at vertices of congruent triangles with the desiredlamina positions for the fixed pivot of design interest.

    Once the series of apparent fixedpivot positions are found as above,the position of the moving pivot on the1 st coupler position is set at the center of the circle that include all of theapparent fixed pivot locations

    Congruent triangles

    For the second crank we need to performa similar relationship with a differentnominated fixed Pivot

    A2

    B1

    A1

    A3

    B2

    B3

    C *

    C *2

    C *3

    B*

    C 1

    D

    E

    C 2

    C 3

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    15/59

    15

    Motion Generation: 3-Position Coupler

    A2

    B1

    A1

    A3

    B2

    B3

    C *

    B*

    C 1

    C 2

    C 3

    B1

    A1

    A3

    B2

    B3

    C *

    C *2

    C *3

    A2

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    16/59

    16

    Motion Generation: 3-Position Coupler

    3: nominated fixed pivots One of points A, B is not moving pivot Using Nominated Fixed Pivots to

    define moving pivot It relies on Apparent rather than

    true positions that lie at vertices of congruent triangles with the desiredlamina positions for the fixed pivot of design interest.

    Once the series of apparent fixedpivot positions are found as above,the position of the moving pivot on the1 st coupler position is set at the center of the circle that include all of theapparent fixed pivot locations

    Congruent triangles

    For the second crank we need to performa similar relationship with a differentnominated fixed Pivot

    A2

    B1

    A1

    A3

    B2

    B3

    C *

    B*

    C 1

    C 2

    C 3

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    17/59

    17

    Starts Here:

    We will prepare Apparent PositionsC*2 and C* 3 bymaking CongruentTriangles upon

    A1-B1 workingwith triangles

    A 2B2C* and A 3B3C*

    The true position of the crank starting out is C* to C1where C1 is the center of the circle containing C* -- C 2*

    -- C3* developed in the earlier steps

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    18/59

    18

    Getting C2* -- used intersecting Arcs equal in length to A2-C* and B2-C*

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    19/59

    19

    Now After the Position of C1 determined: The Crank is C*-C1

    Found by making the 2congruent trianglesand then drawing a 3-point circle thru C*,C2* & C3* -- true

    position C1 is thecenter of this circle

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    20/59

    20

    Motion Generation: 3-Position Coupler

    If a 2nd

    Fixed Pivot is desired! Make Congruent triangles to find apparentpositions of the Fixed Pivot

    True Position of first instance of the moving

    pivot is the center of circle containing D* - D2*- D3*

    Then we would check for Grashof type andultimately ability to solve our problem.

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    21/59

    21

    Change of Branch: Will it Work? We must determine if the linkage

    can be assembled and travelwithout being disassembled andreassembled in the other SolutionBranch

    Method 1: animation check Method 2:

    For 4-bar linkages, we can define aangle -- an angle between thecoupler and the Driven (longer) crank in

    all positions If the angle changes sign or direction,

    we are looking at an impracticalsolution one that cant be operated

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    22/59

    22

    3 Coupler Positions: Slider Crank Design Note the Coupler

    Positions The Circle of Sliders is

    formed by finding poles of positional pairs 1-2, 1-3 &2-3 and Image Pole P 23

    note this image pole is areflection of the Truepole P 23 about a lineconnecting poles 1-2 and1-3

    We need to define a fixedpivot (A* or B*) andconnect the crank from the* fixed pivot andappropriate end of thecoupler (the one used to

    find fixed pivot)

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    23/59

    23

    A1 B1 A2

    B2 A3

    B3

    B*

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    24/59

    24

    Generating P 12 :

    Similar work forother two poles

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    25/59

    25

    After Generating all three poles:

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    26/59

    26

    With Image Pole P 23

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    27/59

    27

    After Adding the Slider Circle & Slider line

    The Triangle of Coupler position

    to points on theslider line are allcongruent herethe lowest vertexis C markingthe Slider Line the Circle is 3-ptincluding I 12 , I 13 & I23

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    28/59

    28

    Change of Branch?It looks like there is

    no change of Branch ! A fix A i areall CCW;

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    29/59

    29

    Will the Slider Crank Work?

    We need to check order of points The individual C is should be traversed in the

    positional order else the design fails assketched (like the one seen earlier as it turns

    out!)

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    30/59

    30

    Analytical Method : Techniques #1 and #2

    #1: Finding poles ( P ij ) where apole is a point from which twolines can be repositioned by asimple rotation see EQN 6.16 itcontains the solution point locations assumed known in

    Frame space We must be aware of matrix

    singularity issues

    #2: Find Circle Centers on which 3

    points lie Treat Bi in Eqn 6.16 as A j (themiddle point of the 3)

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    31/59

    31

    Analytical Method: Technique #3

    Technique #3 : Coordinate Transformations: oxy, AXY Rotational transformations (Rs) as matrices Translational vectors relating origins of coor. systems

    Relating Coupler (link AP) to Frame ( oxy ) is seen byvectors:

    Typically we would know positions of the coupler inFrame Space ( a x , a y )

    We can compute the Angle:

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    32/59

    32

    Technique #3: Coordinate Transformations

    Coordinate Transformation from Coupler toFrame is (given X, Y):

    X, Y are Coupler coor. frame

    x, y are base coor. frame

    where is the angle X to x

    x

    y

    a x X R

    a y Y

    Cos Sin RSin Cos

    -

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    33/59

    Transforming Frame (oxy) to Coupler (AXY)

    33

    / /

    / /

    1

    and notice:

    x P A P A

    y P A P A

    T

    a X x A

    aY y

    Cos Sin A

    Sin Cos

    A R R

    Technique #3: Inverse Transformation

    -O

    O

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    34/59

    34

    Technique #4: Imaging Pole

    223'23223'232121321213

    23'23121323

    '231213

    23'2323

    '2312131213

    '23

    '23

    '23231312

    '23231312

    0

    0

    0

    thenunlnownes,areandframe,fixedIn

    y y x x y y x x

    r r

    y y y y x x x x

    j y yi x x j y yi x x

    r r

    y x

    P P P P

    P P P P

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    35/59

    35

    x

    y

    o

    Motion Generation Design: Analytical Models

    Crank design using circlepoints moving points oncoupler Requires circle point (joint on

    coupler) coordinates betransformed to base frame or from ( X,Y ) to ( x, y ) if necessary

    Find poles of the 3positions to define fixedpivot ( x*, y* )

    Crank is ( x*, y* ) to ( x 1, y 1)from transformed circle point1

    Locate 2 nd crank similarlyand build the linkage

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    36/59

    36

    Motion Generation Design: Analytical Models

    Given fixed pivotcoordinates in baseframe Transform coordinates of

    ( x*, y* ) to coupler space(for each coupler position)using A matrices

    Find coupler pole of the 3*ed transformed position

    it becomes ( X,Y ), nowtransform this pole to

    frame coordinate for pos i (chosen one and use its Rmatrix)

    Crank in pos i is located by( x*, y* ) to ( x i , y i )

    x

    y

    o

    X 1

    Y 1 X 2

    X 3

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    37/59

    37

    Motion Generation Design: Analytical Models

    Design of Slider: Follow the steps on page282 283

    We use all the tools:

    Transforming coor. betweenframe and coupler Finding poles Finding image poles Finding circles (center and

    radius) Defining slider line points and

    ultimately the slider line parametrically

    Determining if slider order iscorrect

    x

    y

    o

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    38/59

    Design Topics

    Function generation 4-bar linkages

    Input-output angle function Two precise positions

    Three precise position

    38

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    39/59

    39

    Function Generation Using 4-Bar Linkage

    The goal is to design a linkage whoscoupler or cranks follow the motion definedas a function between an input variable anda desired output result

    Finding Precision Points Constraint equation: f ( , , a 1, a 2, a 3, a 4) = 0

    , : Input and output a

    1, a

    2, a

    3, a

    4: design variables defining the linkage,

    such as r 1, r 2, r 3, r 4, unknowns . Input/output function g ( , ) = 0: define , to

    give precision points. If we have 4 a i s then itis 4 ( , ) precision points!

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    40/59

    Function Generation Design Procedure for 4-bar linkage

    Target: a 4-bar linkage

    Given: Function g : input/output relationship Range of input variable and/or output variable

    1. Build constrain equation f by scaling one link length(such as r 1) as 1

    2. Select number of (maybe 3) input positions: Chebyshev3. Using g to get three output positions4. Put steps 2, 3 into step 1 to get number of ( such as

    three) equations5. Solve the equations to get design variables, such asr 2, r 3, r 4

    6. Scale back to get the final design7. Check your design using Grashof Inequality

    40

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    41/59

    41

    The Actual Goal Is Linkage Design

    We start with 3 values for and related to thedesired function Then we will develop x -, y - Component Models

    for the links (with a unit base)

    d l l k

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    42/59

    42

    Models: linkage constraints

    2 3 4

    2 3 4

    2 2 23 4 2 4 2 4 2

    we will plug in our 3 pairs of values ,

    to build 3 equations. & solve for t

    We will eliminate leading to:

    1

    1 2 2 2

    1, 2 3i i

    r Cos r Cos r Cosr Sin r Sin r Sin

    r r r r Cos r Cos r r Cos

    i or

    he 'si

    r

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    43/59

    43

    Our Text Suggests a Change of Variable as

    This last equation canbe easily solved forthe Z is and then r isusing Coeff INV and

    Mathematica or Matlab

    2 2 22 4 3

    1

    2 4

    22

    34

    1 2 1 3 1 1 1

    1 2 2 3 2 2 2

    1 2 3 3 3 3 3

    1 1

    2 2

    3 3

    Leads to modified Equations:z

    z

    z

    into Matrix Form:

    1

    21

    1

    111

    r r r z

    r r z r

    z r

    z Cos z Cos Cos

    z Cos z Cos Cos

    z Cos z Cos Cos

    Cos CosCos CosCos Cos

    1 1 1

    2 2 2

    3 3 3

    z Cos z Cos z Cos

    S l b f i i i

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    44/59

    Select number of input positions:

    The number is based on how many links areunknown1.Give three input values (three input posture)2.If input range is give, then we use Chebyshev formula to get output3.If no direct relationship between input and output( and ) is given, however, we are given both input

    an output range and a second function ( x and y ),then we use linear approximation

    44

    Ch b h P l i l

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    45/59

    Chebyshev Polynomial

    A tool to reduce approximation error: N = # of precision Points, i = 1 to N x 0 is the starting point and x f is the final point

    x i are the roots of the polynomial used to solvethe model for precision points at minimumerror.

    45

    0 0 *2 2 2

    f f i

    x x x x i x Cos

    N N

    +

    Ch b h P l i l ( )

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    46/59

    46

    Chebyshev Polynomial, (cont.)

    Here N = 2 thus we will find x 1 [ 1] & x 2 [ 2]

    0 0

    0 0

    are the roots of the polynomial used to solve the

    generator model for precision points at min. error

    *2 2 2

    * 2 12 2 2

    i

    f f i

    f f i

    x

    x x x x i x Cos N N

    x x x x x Cos i N

    +

    +

    A li i li k i P bl 6 24

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    47/59

    47

    Application - a linkage in Problem 6.24

    Get 3 Precision Points using Ch ebyshevsPolynomial: (generating function: = 2 between .5and 1 radian)

    NOTE: we neveruse end pointsas precisionpoints but themiddle is used if an odd numberof precisionpoints is needed

    0

    1

    2

    3

    21 1

    22 2

    23 3

    .5 ; 1.0

    1.5 .5 2 1 1 .53352 2 2 3

    1.5 .5 2 2 1 0.752 2 2 3

    1.5 .5 2 3 1 .96652 2 2 3.2846

    .5625

    .9341

    f r r

    r r Cos r

    r r Cos r

    r r Cos r

    r

    r

    r

    R i S f M l b

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    48/59

    48

    Resorting to Software: Matlabtheta1=0.5335;

    theta2=0.75;theta3=0.9665;

    fei1=0.2846;fei2=0.5625;fei3=0.9341;

    A=[1 cos(fei1) -cos(theta1);1 cos(fei2) -cos(theta2);1 cos(fei3) -cos(theta3)];b=[cos(theta1-fei1); cos(theta2-fei2);cos(theta3-fei3)];

    z= inv(A)*b

    z =

    1.0580-0.00190.1011

    D i P

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    49/59

    49

    Design Parameters:

    r 2 = 1/z 2 = 1/-.00188 = -531.91 r 4 = 1/z 3 = 1/.1011 = 9.89 r 3 = (1+r 2^2 + r 4^2 - 2r 2r 4z1) = 521.44 Scaling back to Base size of 2 (not 1!)

    r1 = 2 (given in problem) r2 = 1063.8 r3 = 1042.9 r4 = 19.8

    Looking at these values: since they are sodifferent (link ratios are large) this is likely not avery good design (structurally unsound)

    Additionally, it is a type II Grashof design

    L t T P 6 23

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    50/59

    50

    Lets Try Pr. 6.23: Problem:

    Input-output constraints : = 2 a 1 + a 2Sin with a 1 anda 2 unknowns Function we wish to generate: = 2 2 (angles in

    radians) To get a 1 and a 2 over the range: 0< < /2

    Analysis : We need to select , to decide u nknowns a 1 &a 2 Need 2 precision points ( 1, 1) and ( 2, 2) Using the Chebyshev Polynomial

    Fi di [ ] d [ ]

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    51/59

    51

    1

    1

    2

    2

    0 02 2 * 2*1 12 2 2*2

    0.7854 0.7854* ( / 4) 0.2300 13.180

    0 02 2 * 2*2 12 2 2*2

    0.7854 0.7854* (3 / 4) 1.3408 76.820

    Cos

    Cos r

    Cos

    Cos r

    2 21 1

    2 22 2

    2 2*.2300 0.1058 6.06392 2*1.3408 3.5953 205.993

    r r

    Finding xs [ s] and ys [ s]:

    or or

    or

    or

    S l i f &

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    52/59

    52

    Solving for a 1 & a 2

    )sin(67956.4)48052.0(2

    areThere

    ,for equationsthesolevcanWe

    )sin(2

    )sin(2

    areThere,getcanwe,,Given

    21

    2212

    1211

    2121

    aa

    aa

    aa

    D t i i g d l t 45

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    53/59

    53

    Determining model error at = 45

    21 2

    2

    2 2

    2 .96104 4.679564 4

    1.2337 2.34791 1.11421

    act est

    g g

    e

    e a a Sin

    e Sin

    e

    N di t l ti b t d d

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    54/59

    54

    No direct relation between and x, and y:

    In the previous slides we have explored thetechniques using precision points

    Usually, however, we are not given output andinput relationship directly In this case, we normally use a linear relationship

    between and x and another linear relationshipbetween and y as follows:

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    f f

    f f

    y y y y

    x x

    x x

    00

    0

    0

    000

    0

    f f

    i

    f f

    i

    i

    y y y y

    x x x x

    i

    Gi en F nction m + b

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    55/59

    55

    Given a Function: y = mx + b

    Example Y from 0 to 1.0 while X is .5 to 2.3 Therefore: b = -0.179 and m = 0.357

    Y = 0.357 x -0.179

    We want to change by -45 , (110 to 65 ) Rad: -0.78539, (1.9200, 1.1345)

    while changes by -25 , (135 to 110 ) Rad: -0.4361, (2.3562, 1.9200)

    Lets use: linear model relationships between X/ and Y/ 3 precision points due to r 1=1, r 2, r 3, r 4

    Modeling: Chebyshev Polynomial

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    56/59

    56

    Modeling: Chebyshev Polynomial

    0 01

    02

    0 03

    1

    2

    3

    30 0.620582 2

    1.42

    150 2.179422 2

    0.357*.62058 .179 0.042550.357*1.4 .179 0.32080

    0.357* 2.17942 .179 0.59905

    f f

    f

    f f

    x x x x x Cos

    x x x

    x x x x x Cos

    y y

    y

    Angles for the linkage:

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    57/59

    57

    Angles for the linkage:With theseangular inputs,we enter the

    Matrix Design Models of earlier.

    Solve for Zisconvert to r2, r3,r4 (with unitbase length)

    00

    0

    00

    0

    1

    2 3

    1

    2 3

    :

    .62058 .5 .7854 1.9200 1.86742.3 .5

    :

    1.5273 ; 1.1872

    0.04255 0 * .4363 2.3562 2.33761 0

    :

    2.2162 ; 2.0948

    ii

    f

    ii

    f

    x x

    x x y y y y

    here

    r

    similarly

    r r

    r

    similarily

    r r

    r means the unitis radian

    D

    D

    If r = 1 then:

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    58/59

    58

    If r 1 = 1 then:

    r 2 = 1/ z 2 = 1/3.77042 = 0.2652 r 4 = 1/ z 3 = 1/.68066 = 1.4692 r 3 = (1+r 22 + r 42 2r 2r 4z 1) =1.9143

    This is a Type I Grashof linkage ( s+l < p+q ) and r

    2is the crank in a crank rocker

    type of linkage

    Graphical Approach for Function Generation 4 bar Linkage

  • 7/29/2019 ME 3230 Chapter 6 Plannar Linkage Design -1

    59/59

    Graphical Approach for Function Generation 4 bar Linkage


Recommended