Date post: | 05-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | amine-benseddik |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 1/14
MESB374System Modeling and Analysis
System Stability and Steady StateResponse
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 2/14
• Stability Concept
Describes the ability of a system to stay at its equilibrium position in the
absence of any inputs.
Stability
Ex: Pendulum
where the derivatives of all states are zeros
invertedpendulum
simplependulum
hill plateau valley
– A linear time invariant (LTI) system is stable if and only if (iff) itsfree response converges to zero for all ICs.
Ball on curved surface
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 3/14
Examples (stable and unstable 1st ordersystems)Q: free response of a 1 st order system.
05 (0) y y u t y y
1
5( )0
t
y t y e
Q: free response of a 1 st order system.
1
5 1G s TF:
Pole: 0.2 p
t
y
t
y
05 (0) y y u t y y
1
5( )0
t
y t y e
1
5 1G s TF:
Pole: 0.2 p
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 4/14
• Stability Criterion for LTI Systems
Stability of LTI Systems
( ) ( 1) ( ) ( 1)
1 1 0 1 1 0
1
1 1 0
Characteristic Polynomial
Stable All poles lie in the left-half complex plane (LHP)
All roots of ( ) 0 l
n n m m
n m m
n n
n
y a y a y a y b u b u b u b u
D s s a s a s a
ie in the LHP
Complex (s-plane)
Re
Im
Marginallystable/``unstable’’
RelativeStability(gain/phase margin)
AbsolutelyStable
Unstable
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 5/14
• Comments on LTI Stability
– Stability of an LTI system does not depend on the input (why?)
– For 1st and 2nd order systems, stability is guaranteed if all the
coefficients of the characteristic polynomial are positive (of same
sign).
– Effect of Poles and Zeros on Stability
• Stability of a system depends on its poles only.• Zeros do not affect system stability.
• Zeros affect the specific dynamic response of the system.
Stability of LTI Systems
0 02
1 0 1 2
( ) : Stable 0( ) : Stable 0 and 0
D s s a a D s s a s a a a
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 6/14
• Passive systems are usually stable
– Any initial energy in the system is usually dissipated in real-worldsystems (poles in LHP);
– If there is no dissipation mechanisms, then there will be poles on
the imaginary axis
– If any coefficients of the denominator polynomial of the TF are
zero, there will be poles with zero RP
System Stability (some empirical guidelines)
• Active systems can be unstable
– Any initial energy in the system can be amplified by internal source
of energy (feedback)
– If all the coefficients of the denominator polynomial are NOT thesame sign, system is unstable
– Even if all the coefficients of the denominator polynomial are the
same sign, instability can occur (Routh’s stability criterion for
continuous-time system)
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 7/14
In Class Exercises(1) Obtain TF of the following system:
(2) Plot the poles and zeros of the systemon the complex plane.
(3) Determine the system’s stability.
L
2 5 y y y u u y y y u u u 6 3 4
22 5s Y s sY s Y s sU s U s
2
1
2 5
Y s sG s
U s s s
Poles:
Zero:
22 5 0s s 1,2
2 4 201 2
2 p j
1 0s 1 z
Real
Img.
11 2 p j
2 1 2 p j
1 z
Stable
(1) Obtain TF of the following system:
(2) Plot the poles and zeros of the systemon the complex plane.
(3) Determine the system’s stability.
TF:
2
3 2
3 4
6
Y s s sG s
U s s s s
Poles:
Zeros:
3 26 0s s s 1 2,3
1 230,
2
j p p
2 3 4 0s s 1,2
3 7
2
j z
Real
Img.
3
1 23
2 2 p j Marginally
Stable
2
1 23
2 2 p j
1 0 p
1
3 7
2 2
z j
2
3 7
2 2 z j
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 8/14
Example
Inverted Pendulum(1) Derive a mathematical model for
a pendulum.
(2) Find the equilibrium positions.
(3) Discuss the stability of theequilibrium positions.
B
mg
l
EOM: sino I mgl B
is very small
Equilibrium
position: 0
0
0
Assumption:
Linearized EOM:
0o
o
K
I mgl B
I B mgl
Characteristic
equation: 2
0o
s I sB K
Poles: 2
1,2
4
2
o
o
B B KI p
I
Real
Img.
Unstable
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 9/14
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 10/14
Transient and Steady State ResponseEx:
5u t t
5 10 y y u
to a ramp input:
Let’s find the total response of a stable first order system:
with I.C.: 0 2 y
- total response
20
Transfer FunctionFree Response
Forced Response
10 5 12
5 5 y
U s
Y ss s s
- PFE 31 2
2
2
5 5
aa aY s
s s s s
22 forced
0( ) 10
sa s Y s
0
2 12
1 forced 22 1 00
1 50 50( ) 2
2 1 ! 5 5s
ss
d d a s Y s
ds ds s s
3 forced5
5 ( ) 2s
a s Y s
5 5
3
Transient responseSteady state response Transient responsefree responsefrom Forced response from Forced response
2 10 2t t y t t a e e
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 11/14
Transient and Steady State Response
to a input u(t) can be decomposed into two parts
In general, the total response of a STABLE LTI system
Transient Response Steady State Response
T SS y t y t y t
( ) ( 1) ( ) ( 1)
1 1 0 1 1 0
n n m m
n m m y a y a y a y b u b u b u b u
where
• Transient Response
– contains the free response of the system plus a portion of forced response
– will decay to zero at a rate that is determined by the characteristic roots (poles)
of the system
• Steady State Response
– will take the same (similar) form as the forcing input
– Specifically, for a sinusoidal input, the steady response will be a sinusoidal
signal with the same frequency as the input but with different magnitude and
phase.
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 12/14
Transient and Steady State ResponseEx:
5sin 3u t t
4 3 6 y y y u
to a sinusoidal input:
Let’s find the total response of a stable second order system:
with I.C.: 0 0, 0 2 y y
- total response
2 2 2 2
Forced Response Free Response
6 5 3 2 4 2
4 3 3 4 3
sY s
s s s s s
- PFE
31 2 4 1 2
3 1 3 3 3 1
aa a a b bY s
s s s j s j s s
2
9
2a 1
5
2a
3
11
2a j
3 3
3 1 1 2 2
Steady state response Transient response
1 3
2Re
7 155sin 3 tan 2
2 2
jt t t
t t
y t a e a b e a b e
t e e
4
11
2a j
2 3b 1 1b
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 13/14
Steady State Response
f f t sF st s
( ) lim ( ) lim ( ) 0
4 12 4 3 y y y u u
2
4 3 5
4 12
sY s
s s s
• Final Value Theorem (FVT)
Given a signal’s LT F(s), if all of the poles of sF(s) lie in the LHP, then f(t) converges to a constant value as given in the following form
Ex.
(1). If a constant input u=5 is applied to the sysetm at time t=0, determine
whether the output y(t) will converge to a constant value?
(2). If the output converges, what will be its steady state value?
We did not consider the effects of IC since •it is a stable system •we are only interested in steady state response
A linear system is described by the following equation:
0
5( ) lim ( ) lim ( )
4t s y y t sY s
7/31/2019 ME374 Stability FP02[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/me374-stability-fp021 14/14
Steady State ResponseGiven a general n-th order stable system
( ) ( 1) ( ) ( 1)
1 1 0 1 1 0
n n m m
n m m y a y a y a y b u b u b u b u
1
1 1 0
1
1 1 0
m m
m m
n n
n
b s b s b s bG s
s a s a s a
1
1 1 0
( )( )
Free n n
n
F sY s
s a s a s a
Free Response
Transfer Function
Steady State Value of Free Response (FVT)
10 01 1 0
00
( )lim ( ) lim
0 (0)lim 0
SS Free n ns sn
s
sF s y sY ss a s a s a
F
a
In SS value of a stable LTI system, there is NO contribution from ICs.