+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Mean Atmospheric Moisture Profiles to 31 km for Middle Latitudes

Mean Atmospheric Moisture Profiles to 31 km for Middle Latitudes

Date post: 03-Oct-2016
Category:
Upload: murray
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
3
Applied Optics Letters to the Editor Letters to the Editor should be addressed to the Editor, APPLIED OPTICS, 1155 16th St., N.W., Washington 6, B.C. Mean Atmospheric Moisture Profiles to 31 km for Middle Latitudes Murray Gutnick Meteorological Development Laboratory, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Bedford, Massachusetts. Received 1 June 1962. Average yearly vertical profiles up to 31 km in middle latitudes of mixing ratio and dewpoint-frostpoint, derived independently, are presented in a table and a figure. Also, since the relation between mixing ratio and frostpoint is nonlinear, other moisture expressions were derived from each of the basic profiles, using Standard Atmosphere conditions. Up to 7 km the basic profiles were developed from conventional radiosonde humidity measure- ments; above that level they are based upon experimental humidity ascents, subjectively selected and weighted. The annual mid-latitude mixing ratio profile decreases from 6150 ppm (mg/kg) at the surface to 9 ppm at 16 km, then in- creases slightly with height; the surface dewpoint is taken at 4°C, decreasing to 78°C at 18 km, then increasing 0.5 deg/km. This letter is a brief summary of a comprehensive study 1 pre- senting preliminary models of the variation of atmospheric moisture with height. The concept is similar to that of other standard atmospheres. The paucity and ambiguity of upper-air moisture data make the models offered here quite crude. As observations increase, the models can be revised, refined, and extended evolving in the same way as other representations of atmospheric structure. The tropospheric portion of the mixing ratio profile was derived by estimating, from recent maps, the mean annual pre- cipitable water above each of four widely separated surfaces at 45°N. The corresponding mean mixing ratios were assumed to be those of two stations having the same precipitable water as the derived mean annual values. The stratospheric portion of the mixing ratio profile is a weighted average of the best soundings from each of half-a-dozen sets of experimental moisture ascents, and the means of all valid ascents of the two sets of routine stratospheric moisture measurements. In the figure, symbols represent: BRL—Mean of 2 hygrometric ascents by Ballistic Research Laboratories; NRL—Mean of 3 hygrometric ascents by U.S. Naval Research Laboratories; U of D—One hygrometric and one spectroscopic ascent by University of Denver; JMA—Means of the Japanese Meteorological Agency hygro- metric ascents; 100 of which reached or exceeded 300 mb and two of which reached 10 mb; MRF—Means of the British Meteorological Research Flight hygrometric ascents, 400 of which reached or exceeded 300 mb; Vapor Trap—Mean of seven ascents of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority's water vapor absorption device; Molecular Sieve—A single ascent of the General Mills, Inc., water vapor absorption device. The dewpoint profile was constructed by the same procedure. Stratospheric frostpoints were approximated when unavailable from the soundings. Resulting mean annual vertical profiles to 31 km in middle latitudes (35 to 55°N) of mixing ratio and dewpoint-frostpoint, obtained as independent means from the same basic measure- ments of stratospheric moisture and routine tropospheric radio- sonde observations, are presented in the accompanying table. Neither profile can be obtained from the other, since the non- linear relation between mixing ratio and condensation tempera- ture (dewpoint-frostpoint) insures that the means, separately obtained, will differ. From each of the basic profiles, other expressions for the moisture content of the atmosphere have been derived, using Standard Atmosphere conditions where required. The two sets of values for absolute humidity (vapor density), vapor pressure, precipitable water, and relative humidity differ, of course. Preferred values are indicated by asterisk. Relative humidity up to 7 km was computed directly from radiosonde data. The most reliable single element is the mixing ratio, because all the selected data were given in terms of mixing ratio and required no approximations, such as those used for the dewpoint-frost- 670 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 1, No. 5 / September 1962
Transcript

Applied Optics Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor should be addressed to the Editor, APPLIED OPTICS, 1155 16th St., N.W., Washington 6, B.C.

Mean Atmospheric Moisture Profiles to 31 km for Middle Latitudes

Murray Gutnick Meteorological Development Laboratory, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Bedford, Massachusetts. Received 1 June 1962.

Average yearly vertical profiles up to 31 km in middle latitudes of mixing ratio and dewpoint-frostpoint, derived independently, are presented in a table and a figure. Also, since the relation between mixing ratio and frostpoint is nonlinear, other moisture expressions were derived from each of the basic profiles, using Standard Atmosphere conditions. Up to 7 km the basic profiles were developed from conventional radiosonde humidity measure­ments; above tha t level they are based upon experimental humidity ascents, subjectively selected and weighted.

The annual mid-latitude mixing ratio profile decreases from 6150 ppm (mg/kg) at the surface to 9 ppm at 16 km, then in­creases slightly with height; the surface dewpoint is taken at 4°C, decreasing to 78°C at 18 km, then increasing 0.5 deg/km.

This letter is a brief summary of a comprehensive study1 pre­senting preliminary models of the variation of atmospheric moisture with height. The concept is similar to tha t of other standard atmospheres. The paucity and ambiguity of upper-air moisture data make the models offered here quite crude. As observations increase, the models can be revised, refined, and extended evolving in the same way as other representations of atmospheric structure.

The tropospheric portion of the mixing ratio profile was derived by estimating, from recent maps, the mean annual pre-cipitable water above each of four widely separated surfaces at 45°N. The corresponding mean mixing ratios were assumed to be those of two stations having the same precipitable water as the derived mean annual values. The stratospheric portion of the mixing ratio profile is a weighted average of the best soundings from each of half-a-dozen sets of experimental moisture ascents, and the means of all valid ascents of the two sets of routine

stratospheric moisture measurements. In the figure, symbols represent:

BRL—Mean of 2 hygrometric ascents by Ballistic Research Laboratories;

NRL—Mean of 3 hygrometric ascents by U.S. Naval Research Laboratories;

U of D—One hygrometric and one spectroscopic ascent by University of Denver;

JMA—Means of the Japanese Meteorological Agency hygro­metric ascents; 100 of which reached or exceeded 300 mb and two of which reached 10 mb;

MRF—Means of the British Meteorological Research Flight hygrometric ascents, 400 of which reached or exceeded 300 mb;

Vapor Trap—Mean of seven ascents of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority's water vapor absorption device;

Molecular Sieve—A single ascent of the General Mills, Inc., water vapor absorption device.

The dewpoint profile was constructed by the same procedure. Stratospheric frostpoints were approximated when unavailable from the soundings.

Resulting mean annual vertical profiles to 31 km in middle latitudes (35 to 55°N) of mixing ratio and dewpoint-frostpoint, obtained as independent means from the same basic measure­ments of stratospheric moisture and routine tropospheric radio­sonde observations, are presented in the accompanying table. Neither profile can be obtained from the other, since the non­linear relation between mixing ratio and condensation tempera­ture (dewpoint-frostpoint) insures that the means, separately obtained, will differ.

From each of the basic profiles, other expressions for the moisture content of the atmosphere have been derived, using Standard Atmosphere conditions where required. The two sets of values for absolute humidity (vapor density), vapor pressure, precipitable water, and relative humidity differ, of course. Preferred values are indicated by asterisk. Relative humidity up to 7 km was computed directly from radiosonde data.

The most reliable single element is the mixing ratio, because all the selected data were given in terms of mixing ratio and required no approximations, such as those used for the dewpoint-frost-

670 APPLIED OPTICS / Vol. 1, No. 5 / September 1962

a Bas

ed o

n av

aila

ble

rout

ine

and

expe

rim

enta

l dat

a co

nsid

ered

relia

ble,

with

rel

ated

qua

ntit

ies

com

pute

d (w

here

req

uire

d) fo

r con

ditio

ns o

f R

evis

ed U

.S.

Stan

dard

Atm

osph

ere,

196

2.

Stan

dard

atm

osph

ere:

fr

om U

.S.

Stan

dard

Atm

osph

ere,

196

2 ("

USS

A")

-T,

P, ρ

: te

mpe

ratu

re (

°C),

pre

ssur

e (m

b),

dens

ity o

f ai

r (g

/m3)

(ass

umed

dry

).

Pres

sure

of w

ater

vap

or,

in m

icro

bars

: 1 μ

b =

0.00

1 m

b =

1 dy

n/cm

2. e s

: if

sat

urat

ed a

t am

bien

t U

SSA

tem

pera

ture

; fr

om S

MT

94

and

96.

e v:

havi

ng m

ixin

g ra

tio w

at

ambi

ent

USS

A p

ress

ure;

e v

= w

P/0

.622

. e v

' *:

ha

ving

dew

poin

t T d

or

fros

tpoi

nt T

f; fr

om S

MT

94

and

96.

Abso

lute

hum

idity

or

vapo

r de

nsity

or

vapo

r co

ncen

trat

ion

in m

g/m

3 (1

mg/

m3 =

0.0

01 g

/m3).

p s

: If

sat

urat

ed a

t am

bien

t U

SSA

tem

pera

ture

and

den

sity

, fr

om S

MT

108

and

109

. p v

: ha

ving

mix

ing

ratio

w a

t am

bien

t U

SSA

pre

ssur

e an

d de

nsity

; ρv

= ρ

w.

p v'

*:

havi

ng d

ewpo

int

T d o

r fr

ostp

oint

Tf ;

from

SM

T 1

08 a

nd 1

09.

Mix

ing

ratio

, rat

io o

f mas

s of

wat

er v

apor

to t

hat o

f dry

air

in m

ixtu

re, i

n m

g/kg

, or p

arts

per

mill

ion.

w

s: if

sat

urat

ed a

t am

bien

t U

SSA

tem

pera

ture

and

den

sity

; w

s =

ρ s

/ρ.

w *

: es

timat

ed m

ean

mid

-lat

itude

val

ue,

from

ava

ilabl

e m

ixin

g ra

tio d

ata

cons

ider

ed r

elia

ble.

w

': ha

ving

dew

poin

t T d

or

fros

tpoi

nt T

f at

USS

A d

ensi

ty;

w'

= ρ v

'/ρ.

Pr

ecip

itabl

e w

ater

, w

ater

vap

or c

onte

nt o

f ai

r in

2-k

m la

yer

abov

e in

dica

ted

leve

l, if

con

dens

ed to

liqu

id,

in m

icro

ns (

1 μ =

0.00

0 1

cm =

0.0

00 1

g/c

m2).

W

*:

= (p

2 —

p1)w

/g;

w is

mea

n m

ixin

g ra

tio b

etw

een

pres

sure

s p\

and

p2

2 km

apa

rt (

USS

A);

g =

980

cm

/sec

2. W

': ρv'h

, whe

re h

is la

yer

thic

knes

s in

met

ers,

= ρ

v'(

Z1) +

ρv'(

Z1 +

2 k

m).

Re

lativ

e hu

mid

ity,

in p

erce

nt.

U:

rati

o of

pre

ssur

es o

f w

ater

vap

or a

t mix

ing

ratio

w a

nd if

sat

urat

ed a

t USS

A t

empe

ratu

re;

U =

e v

'/es.

U' *

: up

to 6

km

, wei

ghte

d av

erag

e of

obs

erve

d re

lativ

e hu

mid

ities

; ab

ove

6 km

, U

' =

e v'/e

s, fo

r ai

r hav

ing

fros

tpoi

nt T

f and

USS

A t

empe

ratu

re.

Dew

poin

t and

fros

tpoi

nt t

empe

ratu

re,

in d

egre

es C

elsi

us.

T d,

T ƒ:

from

SM

T 9

4 an

d 96

, us

ing

e w a

s de

rive

d fr

om w

. T d

*, T

f : es

timat

ed m

ean

mid

-lat

itude

val

ues,

fro

m a

vaila

ble

data

exp

ress

ed a

s de

wpo

ints

and

fro

stpo

ints

. N

otes

: *

Indi

cate

s va

lues

rec

omm

ende

d fo

r ge

nera

l use

; ot

her

valu

es d

eriv

ed f

or c

ompa

riso

n on

ly.

SMT

= S

mith

soni

an M

eteo

rolo

gica

l Ta

bles

, si

xth

revi

sed

editi

on,

prep

ared

by

R. J

. Lis

t, W

ashi

ngto

n 19

51.

Satu

ratio

n as

sum

ed w

ith r

espe

ct to

pla

ne s

urfa

ces

of li

quid

wat

er a

bove

— 4

0°C

, of

ice

belo

w —

40°C

.

September 1962 / Vol. 1, No. 5 / APPLIED OPTICS 671

Fig. 1. Mean annual mid-latitude mixing ratio.

points. However, the values derived from the dewpoint-frost-point are more reliable than those based on the mixing ratio, because fewer Standard Atmosphere assumptions are used.

The tentative moisture profiles presented herein undoubtedly will be revised and extended as the state-of-the-art advances. The large amount of subjectivity used in deriving the stratos­pheric portion of the moisture profiles makes revision especially desirable. Despite their deficiencies, these models are suggested for general use as mid-latitude standards.

Reference 1. M. Gutnick, Air Force Survey in Geophysics 147, AFCRL,

Bedford, Mass. (July 1962).


Recommended