+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson...

Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson...

Date post: 24-Feb-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
30
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN) CERN-EP-2021-008 2021/02/05 CMS-SMP-19-002 Measurement of Wγ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at s = 13TeV and constraints on effective field theory coefficients The CMS Collaboration * Abstract A fiducial cross section for Wγ production in proton-proton collisions is measured at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 137 fb -1 of data collected using the CMS detector at the LHC. The W e ν and μν decay modes are used in a maximum-likelihood fit to the lepton-photon invariant mass distribution to extract the combined cross sec- tion. The measured cross section is compared with theoretical expectations at next- to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics. In addition, 95% confidence level in- tervals are reported for anomalous triple-gauge couplings within the framework of effective field theory. Submitted to Physical Review Letters © 2021 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration. CC-BY-4.0 license * See Appendix A for the list of collaboration members arXiv:2102.02283v1 [hep-ex] 3 Feb 2021
Transcript
Page 1: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH (CERN)

CERN-EP-2021-0082021/02/05

CMS-SMP-19-002

Measurement of Wγ production cross section inproton-proton collisions at

√s = 13 TeV and constraints on

effective field theory coefficients

The CMS Collaboration*

Abstract

A fiducial cross section for Wγ production in proton-proton collisions is measured ata center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV in 137 fb−1 of data collected using the CMS detectorat the LHC. The W → eν and µν decay modes are used in a maximum-likelihood fitto the lepton-photon invariant mass distribution to extract the combined cross sec-tion. The measured cross section is compared with theoretical expectations at next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics. In addition, 95% confidence level in-tervals are reported for anomalous triple-gauge couplings within the framework ofeffective field theory.

Submitted to Physical Review Letters

© 2021 CERN for the benefit of the CMS Collaboration. CC-BY-4.0 license

*See Appendix A for the list of collaboration members

arX

iv:2

102.

0228

3v1

[he

p-ex

] 3

Feb

202

1

Page 2: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process
Page 3: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

1

The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process that has bearing on the basic ingredients of the standardmodel (SM). A precise measurement of the pp → Wγ cross section probes the WWγ triple-gauge coupling (TGC) and higher-order corrections to it. The structure and strength of theWWγ TGC are closely related to the SU(2)×U(1) gauge symmetry of the SM and the mech-anism for its breaking, which can be altered through the presence of new physics with al-ternative symmetries or symmetry-breaking mechanisms, such as composite W models [1].Physics at high energy scale can be described in a generic way in the framework of effectivefield theory (EFT), and the pp → Wγ production cross section has direct implications for thelowest-dimension operators in the EFT expansion, including OWWW = Tr[WµνWνρWµ

ρ ], whichdirectly affects the WWγ TGC [2]. Previous measurements of Wγ production from the LHCuse the data collected in 2011 at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV [3, 4]. Here we report thefirst measurement of the pp →Wγ cross section at 13 TeV based on data collected by the CMSexperiment in 2016–2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb−1.

At leading order in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), `+ν`γ and `−ν`γ (where ` = e/µ) pro-duction in pp collisions with an s-channel W boson can proceed through initial-state radiation(ISR) from one of the incoming quarks, final-state radiation (FSR) from the outgoing chargedlepton, or the WWγ TGC vertex shown in Fig. 1. At higher orders in QCD, additional quarkscan appear in the final state, and the photon can arise by FSR from an outgoing quark or lepton.

d

u

W+

W+

νe

e

γ

Figure 1: Representative Feynman diagram for pp → `+ν`γ production with a TGC vertex.

The central feature of the CMS apparatus is a superconducting solenoid of 6 m internal di-ameter, providing a magnetic field of 3.8 T. A silicon pixel and strip tracker, a lead tungstatecrystal electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL), and a brass and scintillator hadron calorimeter,each composed of a barrel and two end sections, are located within the magnetic field of thesolenoid. Forward calorimeters extend the pseudorapidity (η) coverage provided by the bar-rel and end detectors. Muons are measured using in gas-ionization chambers, including drifttubes, cathode strip chambers, and resistive plate chambers, embedded in the steel flux-returnyoke outside the solenoid. A more detailed description of the CMS detector, as well as thedefinition of the coordinate system and the relevant kinematic variables, is reported in Ref. [5].

Electrons and photons are measured in the range |η| < 2.5 defined by the tracker acceptance.The energy of electrons is a combination of three measurements: the electron momentum atthe primary interaction vertex as determined by the tracker [6]), the energy of the correspond-ing ECAL cluster, and the energy sum of all bremsstrahlung photons spatially compatible withoriginating from the electron track. The photon momentum is determined solely using the en-ergy measurement in the ECAL. The photon’s ECAL cluster is required to be inconsistent witha charged-particle track reconstructed in the tracker [7]. Muons are measured in the pseudora-pidity range |η| < 2.4 and their momenta are determined using a global fit of muon measure-

Page 4: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

2

ments in the gas-ionization chambers and matched tracks in the silicon tracker [8].

The missing transverse momentum vector ~pmissT is computed as the negative vector pT sum of

all measured particles in an event, reconstructed with the particle flow algorithm [9], and itsmagnitude is denoted by pmiss

T [10]. The ~pmissT of an event is intended to represent the neutrinos

associated with a single pp interaction within a bunch crossing. The contribution to~pmissT due to

particles from additional pp interactions within the same bunch crossing (pileup) is mitigatedthrough the pileup-per-particle identification algorithm [11, 12]. The ~pmiss

T is also modified toinclude corrections to the energy scale and resolution of the reconstructed jets in the event.

The Wγ production cross section has been calculated with next-to-leading-order (NLO) QCDcorrections at fixed order matched to parton shower [13, 14], with NLO electroweak correctionsat fixed order [15], and with next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) QCD corrections at fixedorder [16–18]. For an inclusive cross section, the NLO QCD corrections are large and positive,more than 100% compared to the LO prediction, whereas the NLO electroweak corrections arenegligible compared to experimental precision. The NNLO QCD corrections are positive and20–30% relative to the NLO QCD prediction.

The signal processes pp → `+ν`γ and pp → `−ν`γ are simulated at NLO in QCD using MAD-GRAPH5 aMC@NLO version 5.2.6 [13] with up to one additional jet in the matrix element calcu-lation, merged with jets from the parton showering using the FxFx merging scheme [19]. Thesetwo processes are also simulated at NLO in QCD with POWHEG version 2.0 [14, 20–22] using theNLO competition option selected for handling the radiation of a photon or a jet from Born-levelW boson production with a jet. For both MADGRAPH5 aMC@NLO and POWHEG, the partonshowering and hadronization are performed using PYTHIA8 version 8.226 [23], and the detec-tor simulation is performed using GEANT4 [24]. To match data-taking conditions, we generatethree sets of events corresponding to 2016, 2017, and 2018. The PYTHIA8 CUETP8M1 [25] tunewith the NNPDF30 nlo nf 5 pdfas [26] parton distribution functions (PDF) are used for the2016 simulation, and the PYTHIA8 CP5 [27] tune with the NNPDF31 nnlo hessian pdfas [28]PDFs are used for the 2017 and 2018 simulations. The simulations include W → τντ decays,which are considered part of the signal when a τ decays with an emission of an electron or amuon. No EW or NNLO QCD corrections are applied.

We select W+γ → `+ν`γ and W−γ → `−ν`γ events from the set of events that pass a level-one [29] and a high-level [30] trigger that require a single muon or electron that is isolatedfrom other detector activity and is therefore likely to be promptly produced as opposed toproduced during the hadronization of a jet. The pT threshold of the high-level trigger leptonvaries between 24 and 32 GeV, depending on the year of data taking and the lepton flavor.We require the presence of a single high-quality [31] reconstructed photon, pmiss

T exceeding40 GeV, and that the isolated electron or muon satisfies additional quality criteria [8, 32]. Offlinekinematical requirements on the selected objects, based on the detector acceptance and thetrigger thresholds, are photon pT > 25 GeV, photon |η| < 2.5, electron (muon) |η| < 2.5 (2.4),electron (muon) pT > 30 (26) or > 35 (30) GeV, depending on the year of data taking. To reducethe background from Zγ events, we reject events that contain an additional muon or electron

with pT > 20 GeV that satisfies minimal quality criteria. Finally, ∆R =√(∆η)2 + (∆φ)2, where

∆φ and ∆η are the spatial separations in azimuthal angle φ (in radians) and η between thelepton and photon, is required to exceed 0.5.

The signal is defined as the Wγ process originating from a fiducial region defined with isolatedprompt photons and isolated prompt dressed (as defined below) leptons. A lepton or photonis considered isolated if the pT sum of all stable particles within ∆R = 0.4, divided by the pTof the lepton or photon, is less than 0.5. A lepton is considered prompt if it originates from the

Page 5: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

3

hard process; a photon is considered prompt if it originates from the hard process or an FSR orISR process involving a particle that originates from the hard process. A lepton is dressed byadding to its four-momentum the four-momenta of all photons within ∆R = 0.1; this procedureis intended to restore the lepton to its pre-FSR state. The fiducial region requirements are:photon and lepton |η| < 2.5 and pT > 25 GeV, and ∆R(lepton,photon) > 0.5.

Background processes containing a prompt lepton and a prompt photon, including Zγ pro-duction, ttγ production, and VVγ (where V = W/Z) production are simulated using MAD-GRAPH5 aMC@NLO and PYTHIA8, in a manner similar to that for the signal samples. The back-ground due to photon conversions in the detector material that lead to reconstructed electronsis estimated with a simulated sample of γγ events made with Sherpa version 2.2.5[33]. Thebackground due to events containing nonprompt leptons and photons, including those frominstrumental mismeasurements and genuine leptons/photons within jets, is estimated fromdata. The ratio of well-isolated, high-quality leptons to less-well-isolated, lower-quality lep-tons is measured in a dijet control region in data as a function of the lepton |η| and pT, andcorrected for prompt leptons and prompt photon conversions based on simulated samples. Asimilar procedure is applied for photons based on a W+jets control region. In the nonpromptphoton case, a fit to the width of the photon ECAL shower is used to determine the nonpromptphoton fraction in the well-isolated, high-quality category, as described in Ref. [34]. The twoprocedures are combined in a way that avoids double counting to estimate the contributionfrom events containing both a nonprompt lepton and a nonprompt photon. The backgroundcontribution from events that contain a prompt lepton from the primary interaction and aprompt photon from a pileup interaction, mainly W+jets primary interaction events with γ+jetspileup interaction events, is estimated using simulated samples. Finally, the background fromelectron-induced photons, occurring when an electron track is misreconstructed in the trackeror not properly matched to the corresponding ECAL cluster, is estimated using a fit to them`γ distribution in data, which is sharply peaked because of the Z resonance, with a templateconstructed from simulation.

The observed distributions of m`γ are compared with the expected distributions based on theMADGRAPH5 aMC@NLO simulation in Fig. 2. The experimental data agrees with the predic-tion within uncertainties. The expected and observed numbers of events are listed in Table 1.

The signal strength is extracted from a binned maximum likelihood fit to the m`γ distribution,where the likelihood function is the product of a Poisson probability density functions for eachbin. A simultaneous fit of the electron and muon channels is used for our main results; in addi-tion, muon-channel-only and electron-channel-only fits are performed as a consistency check.In order to efficiently maximize the likelihood function with the large number of parametersthat we consider, we use a TENSORFLOW-based minimizer [35, 36]. The fit is performed in therange 10 to 250 GeV with 2 GeV bins. In the electron-channel-only fit and the simultaneous fit,the normalization of the electron-induced photon template is a free parameter in addition tothe Wγ normalization, whereas in the muon-channel-only fit, the normalization of the electron-induced photon template is constrained by a 100% log-normal uncertainty around its nominalvalue and the Wγ signal normalization is the only free parameter.

A variety of sources of systematic uncertainty are considered as nuisance parameters in the fitsubject to log-normal constraints. Experimental sources of systematic uncertainty include: thejet energy scale and resolution (which affect the~pmiss

T ), the lepton and photon identification effi-ciency, the integrated luminosity measurement, the statistical power of our simulated samplesand data control regions, and the nonprompt photon and nonprompt lepton background es-timation methods. Theoretical sources of systematic uncertainty include: the renormalization

Page 6: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

4

50 100 150 200 250

310

410

510

Eve

nts/

bin

CMS (13 TeV)-1137 fb

Dataγe-induced

Double nonpromptNonprompt electronNonprompt photon conversionγ

PileupγZ

Top/VV

γWPred. Unc.

50 100 150 200 250 (GeV)γem

0.80.9

11.11.2

Dat

a/pr

ed 50 100 150 200 250

310

410

Eve

nts/

bin

CMS (13 TeV)-1137 fb

Dataγe-induced

Double nonpromptNonprompt muonNonprompt photonPileup

γZTop/VV

γW

Pred. Unc.

50 100 150 200 250 (GeV)γµm

0.80.9

11.11.2

Dat

a/pr

edFigure 2: Expected and observed distributions in the invariant mass of the lepton-photon sys-tem in the electron (left) and muon (right) channels. The signal and background processes thatare drawn correspond to the estimates made before the fit, except that normalization of theelectron-induced photon (one of the free parameters) is scaled by 1.8 from its pre-fit value. Theuncertainty in the prediction (the hatched band) is the quadratic sum of the systematic uncer-tainties. The uncertainty in the data is statistical. The Wγ refers to the MADGRAPH5 aMC@NLO

simulation of Wγ events.

and factorization QCD scales, and PDFs. The renormalization and factorization QCD scales arevaried by a factor 2 up and down, excluding the (2,1/2) and (1/2,2) cases, and the envelopeof these variations is taken as the uncertainty. The systematic uncertainty due to the PDFs isthe standard deviation of the 32 members of the PDF4LHC15 nnlo 30 pdfas PDF set [26, 37–39]. The uncertainties in the photon identification efficiency (1–4%, depending on the photonpT and η) and the integrated luminosity measurement (1.8%) have the largest impact on themeasurement.

The theoretically predicted cross section is 15.4± 1.2 (scale)± 0.1 (PDF) pb based on the NLOQCD MADGRAPH5 aMC@NLO simulation and 22.4 ± 3.2 (scale) ± 0.1 (PDF) pb based on theNLO QCD POWHEG simulation with the NLO competition option, where scale refers to QCDscale.

The measured cross section from the simultaneous fit with the uncertainties divided into sta-tistical, experimental, and theoretical components is σ = 15.58± 0.75 pb = 15.58± 0.05 (stat)±0.73 (syst)± 0.15 (theo) pb. The measured cross section based only on the electron channel isσ = 15.09± 0.09 (stat)± 1.02 (syst)± 0.32 (theo) pb and the measured cross section based onlyon the muon channel is σ = 15.77± 0.06 (stat)± 0.88 (syst)± 0.12 (theo) pb.

Next we search for new physics that could result in anomalous contributions to the cross sectionat high mass scale Λ. We consider an EFT in which dimension-six operators are added to theSM [2]:

L = LSM + ∑i

ciΛ2Oi.

Page 7: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

5

Table 1: Expected and observed numbers of events. The signal and background yields corre-spond to the estimates made before the fit, except that normalization of the electron-inducedphoton yield (one of the free parameters) is scaled by 1.8 from its pre-fit value. The un-certainty is the quadratic sum of the systematic uncertainties. The Wγ refers to the MAD-GRAPH5 aMC@NLO simulation of Wγ. The Wγ signal and Wγ nonfiducial are the contribu-tions to the signal region from the Wγ process originating from within and outside the fiducialregion, respectively.

Process eγ µγ

Wγ signal 95 953± 6753 164 438± 8 773Wγ nonfiducial 1 530± 241 2 863± 337

Zγ 22 164± 6 173 45 227± 11 349Top/VV 16 501± 879 25 517± 952

Nonprompt photon 46 984± 2 249 95 838± 4 567Nonprompt lepton 27 099± 8 169 23 008± 6 915Double nonprompt 16 264± 4 885 14 050± 4 219e-induced photon 157 209± 42 269 14 231± 798

Pileup 4 892± 475 11 085± 782Photon conversion 8 318± 494 0± 0

Total 396 913± 54 686 396 257± 22 837

Observation 385 224 395 818

The operators that are relevant to Wγ production are:

OWWW = Tr[WµνWνρWµρ ],

OB = (DµΦ)†Bµν(DνΦ),

OWWW = Tr[WµνWνρWµρ ], and

OW = (DµΦ)†Wµν(DνΦ),

where Wµν and Bµν are the SU(2)×U(1) field strength tensors, Φ is the Higgs field, and Wµν isdefined as εµνρσWρσ/2 (εµνρσ is totally antisymmetric with ε0123 = 1). The lowest dimensionCP-even operator that directly alters the WWγ TGC is OWWW . The photon pT distributionshown in Fig. 3 is used for the extraction of limits on the coefficients of these four operators.The NLO QCD reweighting feature of MADGRAPH5 aMC@NLO [40] is used to determine theyield of the Wγ signal as a function of each operator coefficient.

We compute expected and observed 95% confidence level limits on each operator coefficientbased on the profile likelihood ratio test statistic [41]. Each operator coefficient is scannedindependently with all other operator coefficients set to zero. In addition to the sources of sys-tematic uncertainties considered in the cross section fit, the 45% difference between the MAD-GRAPH5 aMC@NLO and POWHEG fiducial cross sections is assigned as an uncertainty in thenormalization of the SM component of the model. The observed and expected limits are listedin Table 2. The observed limits on cWWW/Λ2 are decreased by a factor of ≈ 1.75 relative tothe previous best result [42]. These limits can be converted through a linear relationship tolimits on the parameters λγ, λγ, and κγ in the Lagrangian approach to anomalous couplings,also known as the LEP parametrization, described in Ref. [2]. The expected limits on theseparameters are −0.0033 < λγ < 0.0033, −0.074 < κγ < 0.072, and −0.0016 < λγ < 0.0016,while the corresponding observed limits are−0.0035 < λγ < 0.0035,−0.066 < κγ < 0.065, and−0.0017 < λγ < 0.0017.

Page 8: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

6

Table 2: Expected and observed 95% confidence level limits on four dimension-six operatorcoefficients. The units of the limits are TeV−2.

Coefficient Exp. lower Exp. upper Obs. lower Obs. uppercWWW/Λ2 −0.85 0.87 −0.90 0.91

cB/Λ2 −46 45 −40 41cWWW/Λ2 −0.43 0.43 −0.45 0.45

cW/Λ2 −23 22 −20 20

500 1000 1500

210

310

Eve

nts/

bin

CMS (13 TeV)-1137 fb

Dataγe-induced

Double nonpromptNonprompt leptonNonprompt photon conversionγ

PileupγZ

Top/VVγW

-2 = 2 TeV2Λ/WWWC

Pred. Unc.

500 1000 1500 (GeV)

TPhoton p

0.8

1

1.2

Dat

a/pr

ed

Figure 3: The photon pT distribution used for the extraction of limits on dimension-six EFToperators. The expected yields correspond to the estimates made before the fit. The uncertaintyin the prediction (the hatched band) is the quadratic sum of the systematic uncertainties. Theuncertainty in the data is statistical. The last bin includes the overflow.

Page 9: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

References 7

In summary, the cross section for pp →Wγ production has been measured at a center-of-massenergy of 13 TeV for the first time. The measured cross section in a defined fiducial regionis σ = 15.58 ± 0.05 (stat) ± 0.73 (syst) ± 0.15 (theo) pb = 15.58 ± 0.75 pb, consistent with theMADGRAPH5 aMC@NLO next-to-leading-order (NLO) quantum chromodynamics (QCD) pre-diction of σ = 15.4± 1.2 (scale)± 0.1 (PDF) pb, and less than the POWHEG NLO QCD with NLOcompetition prediction of σ = 22.4± 3.2 (scale)± 0.1 (PDF) pb. The cross sections in the elec-tron and muon channels are consistent with each other. The high tail of the photon transversemomentum distribution is used to set 95% confidence level limits on dimension-six effectivefield theory parameters, including the most stringent limit to date on the coefficient of OWWW ,the lowest dimension CP-even operator that directly alters the WWγ TGC.

AcknowledgmentsWe congratulate our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments for the excellent perfor-mance of the LHC and thank the technical and administrative staffs at CERN and at other CMSinstitutes for their contributions to the success of the CMS effort. In addition, we gratefullyacknowledge the computing centers and personnel of the Worldwide LHC Computing Gridand other centers for delivering so effectively the computing infrastructure essential to ouranalyses. Finally, we acknowledge the enduring support for the construction and operationof the LHC, the CMS detector, and the supporting computing infrastructure provided by thefollowing funding agencies: BMBWF and FWF (Austria); FNRS and FWO (Belgium); CNPq,CAPES, FAPERJ, FAPERGS, and FAPESP (Brazil); MES (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MoST, andNSFC (China); COLCIENCIAS (Colombia); MSES and CSF (Croatia); RIF (Cyprus); SENESCYT(Ecuador); MoER, ERC PUT and ERDF (Estonia); Academy of Finland, MEC, and HIP (Fin-land); CEA and CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, and HGF (Germany); GSRT (Greece); NK-FIA (Hungary); DAE and DST (India); IPM (Iran); SFI (Ireland); INFN (Italy); MSIP and NRF(Republic of Korea); MES (Latvia); LAS (Lithuania); MOE and UM (Malaysia); BUAP, CIN-VESTAV, CONACYT, LNS, SEP, and UASLP-FAI (Mexico); MOS (Montenegro); MBIE (NewZealand); PAEC (Pakistan); MSHE and NSC (Poland); FCT (Portugal); JINR (Dubna); MON,RosAtom, RAS, RFBR, and NRC KI (Russia); MESTD (Serbia); SEIDI, CPAN, PCTI, and FEDER(Spain); MOSTR (Sri Lanka); Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland); MST (Taipei); ThEPCen-ter, IPST, STAR, and NSTDA (Thailand); TUBITAK and TAEK (Turkey); NASU (Ukraine); STFC(United Kingdom); DOE and NSF (USA).

References[1] Y. Cui, T. Gherghetta, and J. D. Wells, “Emergent electroweak symmetry breaking with

composite W, Z bosons”, JHEP 11 (2009) 80,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/11/080, arXiv:0907.0906.

[2] C. Degrande et al., “Effective field theory: A modern approach to anomalous couplings”,Annals Phys. 335 (2013) 21, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2013.04.016, arXiv:1205.4231.

[3] CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Wγ and Zγ inclusive cross sections in ppcollisions at

√s = 7 TeV and limits on anomalous triple gauge boson couplings”, Phys.

Rev. D 89 (2014) 092005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.092005, arXiv:1308.6832.

[4] ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurements of Wγ and Zγ production in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 112003,

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.112003, arXiv:1205.2531.

Page 10: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

8

[5] CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3 (2008) S08004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004.

[6] CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of electroweak WZ boson production and search fornew physics in WZ + two jets events in pp collisions at

√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 795

(2019) 281, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.042, arXiv:1901.04060.

[7] CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with theCMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, (2020). arXiv:2012.06888. Accepted by JINST.

[8] CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstructionwith proton-proton collisions at

√s = 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P06015,

doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015, arXiv:1804.04528.

[9] CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with theCMS detector”, JINST 12 (2017) P10003, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003,arXiv:1706.04965.

[10] CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction inproton-proton collisions at

√s = 13 TeV using the CMS detector”, JINST 14 (2019)

P07004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/p07004, arXiv:1903.06078.

[11] D. Bertolini, P. Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”, JHEP 10(2014) 059, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059, arXiv:1407.6013.

[12] CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”, JINST 15 (2020) P09018,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018, arXiv:2003.00503.

[13] J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading orderdifferential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”, JHEP 07(2014) 079, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301.

[14] L. Barze et al., “Wγ production in hadronic collisions using the POWHEG+MiNLOmethod”, JHEP 12 (2014) 039, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2014)039,arXiv:1408.5766.

[15] A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Hecht, and C. Pasold, “NLO QCD and electroweakcorrections to W+γ production with leptonic W-boson decays”, JHEP 04 (2015) 018,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)018, arXiv:1412.7421.

[16] M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and M. Wiesemann, “Fully differential NNLO computationswith MATRIX”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 537,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5771-7, arXiv:1711.06631.

[17] M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and D. Rathlev, “Wγ and Zγ production at the LHC in NNLOQCD”, JHEP 07 (2015) 085, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)085, arXiv:1504.01330.

[18] E. Accomando, A. Denner, and S. Pozzorini, “Electroweak-correction effects ingauge-boson pair production at the CERN LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 073003,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.073003, arXiv:hep-ph/0110114.

[19] R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO”, JHEP 12 (2012)061, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061, arXiv:1209.6215.

Page 11: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

References 9

[20] P. Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carloalgorithms”, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040,arXiv:hep-ph/0409146.

[21] S. Frixione, P. Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with partonshower simulations: the POWHEG method”, JHEP 11 (2007) 070,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092.

[22] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLOcalculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”, JHEP 06 (2010) 043,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581.

[23] T. Sjostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015)159, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012.

[24] GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506(2003) 250, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8.

[25] CMS Collaboration, “Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event andmultiparton scattering measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 155,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x, arXiv:1512.00815.

[26] NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”, JHEP 04 (2015) 040,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040, arXiv:1410.8849.

[27] CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes fromunderlying-event measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 4,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4, arXiv:1903.12179.

[28] NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”, Eur.Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 663, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5,arXiv:1706.00428.

[29] CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisionsat√

s = 13 TeV”, JINST 15 (2020) P10017,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165.

[30] CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”, JINST 12 (2017) P01020,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020, arXiv:1609.02366.

[31] CMS Collaboration, “Performance of photon reconstruction and identification with theCMS detector in proton-proton collisions at

√s = 8 TeV”, JINST 10 (2015) P08010,

doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/08/P08010, arXiv:1502.02702.

[32] CMS Collaboration, “Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMSdetector in proton-proton collisions at

√s = 8 TeV”, JINST 10 (2015) P06005,

doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/06/P06005, arXiv:1502.02701.

[33] T. Gleisberg et al., “Event generation with SHERPA 1.1”, JHEP 02 (2009) 007,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/02/007, arXiv:0811.4622.

[34] CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of a Zboson, a photon and two jets in proton-proton collisions at

√s = 13 TeV and constraints

on anomalous quartic couplings”, JHEP 06 (2020) 076,doi:10.1007/jhep06(2020)076, arXiv:2002.09902.

Page 12: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

10

[35] M. Abadi et al., “TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems”,2015. Software available from tensorflow.org. https://www.tensorflow.org/.

[36] CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the W boson rapidity, helicity, and differentialcross sections in pp collisions at

√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 092012,

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.092012, arXiv:2008.04174.

[37] J. Butterworth et al., “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II”, J. Phys. G 43 (2016)023001, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001, arXiv:1510.03865.

[38] L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin, P. Motylinski, and R. S. Thorne, “Parton distributionsin the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs”, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 204,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3397-6, arXiv:1412.3989.

[39] S. Dulat et al., “New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantumchromodynamics”, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033006, arXiv:1506.07443.

[40] O. Mattelaer, “On the maximal use of Monte Carlo samples: re-weighting events at NLOaccuracy”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 674, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4533-7,arXiv:1607.00763.

[41] ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and the LHC Higgs Combination Group, “Procedurefor the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011”, Technical ReportCMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011.

[42] CMS Collaboration, “Search for anomalous triple gauge couplings in WW and WZproduction in lepton + jet events in proton-proton collisions at

√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 12

(2019) 062, doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)062, arXiv:1907.08354.

Page 13: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

11

A The CMS CollaborationYerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, ArmeniaA.M. Sirunyan†, A. Tumasyan

Institut fur Hochenergiephysik, Wien, AustriaW. Adam, J.W. Andrejkovic, T. Bergauer, S. Chatterjee, M. Dragicevic, A. Escalante Del Valle,R. Fruhwirth1, M. Jeitler1, N. Krammer, L. Lechner, D. Liko, I. Mikulec, F.M. Pitters, J. Schieck1,R. Schofbeck, M. Spanring, S. Templ, W. Waltenberger, C.-E. Wulz1

Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk, BelarusV. Chekhovsky, A. Litomin, V. Makarenko

Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, BelgiumM.R. Darwish2, E.A. De Wolf, X. Janssen, T. Kello3, A. Lelek, H. Rejeb Sfar, P. Van Mechelen,S. Van Putte, N. Van Remortel

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumF. Blekman, E.S. Bols, J. D’Hondt, J. De Clercq, M. Delcourt, S. Lowette, S. Moortgat, A. Morton,D. Muller, A.R. Sahasransu, S. Tavernier, W. Van Doninck, P. Van Mulders

Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumD. Beghin, B. Bilin, B. Clerbaux, G. De Lentdecker, L. Favart, A. Grebenyuk, A.K. Kalsi,K. Lee, I. Makarenko, L. Moureaux, L. Petre, A. Popov, N. Postiau, E. Starling, L. Thomas,C. Vander Velde, P. Vanlaer, D. Vannerom, L. Wezenbeek

Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumT. Cornelis, D. Dobur, M. Gruchala, G. Mestdach, M. Niedziela, C. Roskas, K. Skovpen,M. Tytgat, W. Verbeke, B. Vermassen, M. Vit

Universite Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumA. Bethani, G. Bruno, F. Bury, C. Caputo, P. David, C. Delaere, I.S. Donertas, A. Giammanco,V. Lemaitre, K. Mondal, J. Prisciandaro, A. Taliercio, M. Teklishyn, P. Vischia, S. Wertz,S. Wuyckens

Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilG.A. Alves, C. Hensel, A. Moraes

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilW.L. Alda Junior, M. Barroso Ferreira Filho, H. BRANDAO MALBOUISSON, W. Carvalho,J. Chinellato4, E.M. Da Costa, G.G. Da Silveira5, D. De Jesus Damiao, S. Fonseca De Souza,D. Matos Figueiredo, C. Mora Herrera, K. Mota Amarilo, L. Mundim, H. Nogima,P. Rebello Teles, L.J. Sanchez Rosas, A. Santoro, S.M. Silva Do Amaral, A. Sznajder, M. Thiel,F. Torres Da Silva De Araujo, A. Vilela Pereira

Universidade Estadual Paulista a, Universidade Federal do ABC b, Sao Paulo, BrazilC.A. Bernardesa,a, L. Calligarisa, T.R. Fernandez Perez Tomeia, E.M. Gregoresa,b, D.S. Lemosa,P.G. Mercadantea,b, S.F. Novaesa, Sandra S. Padulaa

Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia,BulgariaA. Aleksandrov, G. Antchev, I. Atanasov, R. Hadjiiska, P. Iaydjiev, M. Misheva, M. Rodozov,M. Shopova, G. Sultanov

University of Sofia, Sofia, BulgariaA. Dimitrov, T. Ivanov, L. Litov, B. Pavlov, P. Petkov, A. Petrov

Page 14: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

12

Beihang University, Beijing, ChinaT. Cheng, W. Fang3, Q. Guo, T. Javaid6, M. Mittal, H. Wang, L. Yuan

Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, ChinaM. Ahmad, G. Bauer, C. Dozen7, Z. Hu, J. Martins8, Y. Wang, K. Yi9,10

Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, ChinaE. Chapon, G.M. Chen6, H.S. Chen6, M. Chen, A. Kapoor, D. Leggat, H. Liao, Z.-A. LIU6,R. Sharma, A. Spiezia, J. Tao, J. Thomas-wilsker, J. Wang, H. Zhang, S. Zhang6, J. Zhao

State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, ChinaA. Agapitos, Y. Ban, C. Chen, Q. Huang, A. Levin, Q. Li, M. Lu, X. Lyu, Y. Mao, S.J. Qian,D. Wang, Q. Wang, J. Xiao

Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, ChinaZ. You

Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beamApplication (MOE) - Fudan University, Shanghai, ChinaX. Gao3, H. Okawa

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ChinaM. Xiao

Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, ColombiaC. Avila, A. Cabrera, C. Florez, J. Fraga, A. Sarkar, M.A. Segura Delgado

Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, ColombiaJ. Jaramillo, J. Mejia Guisao, F. Ramirez, J.D. Ruiz Alvarez, C.A. Salazar Gonzalez,N. Vanegas Arbelaez

University of Split, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and NavalArchitecture, Split, CroatiaD. Giljanovic, N. Godinovic, D. Lelas, I. Puljak

University of Split, Faculty of Science, Split, CroatiaZ. Antunovic, M. Kovac, T. Sculac

Institute Rudjer Boskovic, Zagreb, CroatiaV. Brigljevic, D. Ferencek, D. Majumder, M. Roguljic, A. Starodumov11, T. Susa

University of Cyprus, Nicosia, CyprusA. Attikis, E. Erodotou, A. Ioannou, G. Kole, M. Kolosova, S. Konstantinou, J. Mousa,C. Nicolaou, F. Ptochos, P.A. Razis, H. Rykaczewski, H. Saka

Charles University, Prague, Czech RepublicM. Finger12, M. Finger Jr.12, A. Kveton

Escuela Politecnica Nacional, Quito, EcuadorE. Ayala

Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, EcuadorE. Carrera Jarrin

Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt, EgyptianNetwork of High Energy Physics, Cairo, EgyptS. Abu Zeid13, S. Khalil14, E. Salama15,13

Page 15: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

13

Center for High Energy Physics (CHEP-FU), Fayoum University, El-Fayoum, EgyptA. Lotfy, Y. Mohammed

National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Tallinn, EstoniaS. Bhowmik, A. Carvalho Antunes De Oliveira, R.K. Dewanjee, K. Ehataht, M. Kadastik, J. Pata,M. Raidal, C. Veelken

Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandP. Eerola, L. Forthomme, H. Kirschenmann, K. Osterberg, M. Voutilainen

Helsinki Institute of Physics, Helsinki, FinlandE. Brucken, F. Garcia, J. Havukainen, V. Karimaki, M.S. Kim, R. Kinnunen, T. Lampen,K. Lassila-Perini, S. Lehti, T. Linden, H. Siikonen, E. Tuominen, J. Tuominiemi

Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, FinlandP. Luukka, H. Petrow, T. Tuuva

IRFU, CEA, Universite Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceC. Amendola, M. Besancon, F. Couderc, M. Dejardin, D. Denegri, J.L. Faure, F. Ferri, S. Ganjour,A. Givernaud, P. Gras, G. Hamel de Monchenault, P. Jarry, B. Lenzi, E. Locci, J. Malcles,J. Rander, A. Rosowsky, M.O. Sahin, A. Savoy-Navarro16, M. Titov, G.B. Yu

Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, CNRS/IN2P3, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechniquede Paris, Palaiseau, FranceS. Ahuja, F. Beaudette, M. Bonanomi, A. Buchot Perraguin, P. Busson, C. Charlot, O. Davignon,B. Diab, G. Falmagne, R. Granier de Cassagnac, A. Hakimi, I. Kucher, A. Lobanov,C. Martin Perez, M. Nguyen, C. Ochando, P. Paganini, J. Rembser, R. Salerno, J.B. Sauvan,Y. Sirois, A. Zabi, A. Zghiche

Universite de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Strasbourg, FranceJ.-L. Agram17, J. Andrea, D. Apparu, D. Bloch, G. Bourgatte, J.-M. Brom, E.C. Chabert,C. Collard, D. Darej, J.-C. Fontaine17, U. Goerlach, C. Grimault, A.-C. Le Bihan, P. Van Hove

Universite de Lyon, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS-IN2P3, Institut de PhysiqueNucleaire de Lyon, Villeurbanne, FranceE. Asilar, S. Beauceron, C. Bernet, G. Boudoul, C. Camen, A. Carle, N. Chanon, D. Contardo,P. Depasse, H. El Mamouni, J. Fay, S. Gascon, M. Gouzevitch, B. Ille, Sa. Jain, I.B. Laktineh,H. Lattaud, A. Lesauvage, M. Lethuillier, L. Mirabito, K. Shchablo, L. Torterotot, G. Touquet,M. Vander Donckt, S. Viret

Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, GeorgiaG. Adamov, Z. Tsamalaidze12

RWTH Aachen University, I. Physikalisches Institut, Aachen, GermanyL. Feld, K. Klein, M. Lipinski, D. Meuser, A. Pauls, M.P. Rauch, J. Schulz, M. Teroerde

RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, GermanyD. Eliseev, M. Erdmann, P. Fackeldey, B. Fischer, S. Ghosh, T. Hebbeker, K. Hoepfner, H. Keller,L. Mastrolorenzo, M. Merschmeyer, A. Meyer, G. Mocellin, S. Mondal, S. Mukherjee, D. Noll,A. Novak, T. Pook, A. Pozdnyakov, Y. Rath, H. Reithler, J. Roemer, A. Schmidt, S.C. Schuler,A. Sharma, S. Wiedenbeck, S. Zaleski

RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut B, Aachen, GermanyC. Dziwok, G. Flugge, W. Haj Ahmad18, O. Hlushchenko, T. Kress, A. Nowack, C. Pistone,O. Pooth, D. Roy, H. Sert, A. Stahl19, T. Ziemons

Page 16: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

14

Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, GermanyH. Aarup Petersen, M. Aldaya Martin, P. Asmuss, I. Babounikau, S. Baxter, O. Behnke,A. Bermudez Martınez, A.A. Bin Anuar, K. Borras20, V. Botta, D. Brunner, A. Campbell,A. Cardini, P. Connor, S. Consuegra Rodrıguez, V. Danilov, M.M. Defranchis, L. Didukh,D. Domınguez Damiani, G. Eckerlin, D. Eckstein, L.I. Estevez Banos, E. Gallo21, A. Geiser,A. Giraldi, A. Grohsjean, M. Guthoff, A. Harb, A. Jafari22, N.Z. Jomhari, H. Jung, A. Kasem20,M. Kasemann, H. Kaveh, C. Kleinwort, J. Knolle, D. Krucker, W. Lange, T. Lenz, J. Lidrych,K. Lipka, W. Lohmann23, T. Madlener, R. Mankel, I.-A. Melzer-Pellmann, J. Metwally,A.B. Meyer, M. Meyer, J. Mnich, A. Mussgiller, V. Myronenko, Y. Otarid, D. Perez Adan,S.K. Pflitsch, D. Pitzl, A. Raspereza, A. Saggio, A. Saibel, M. Savitskyi, V. Scheurer,C. Schwanenberger, A. Singh, R.E. Sosa Ricardo, N. Tonon, O. Turkot, A. Vagnerini,M. Van De Klundert, R. Walsh, D. Walter, Y. Wen, K. Wichmann, C. Wissing, S. Wuchterl,O. Zenaiev, R. Zlebcik

University of Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyR. Aggleton, S. Bein, L. Benato, A. Benecke, K. De Leo, T. Dreyer, M. Eich, F. Feindt,A. Frohlich, C. Garbers, E. Garutti, P. Gunnellini, J. Haller, A. Hinzmann, A. Karavdina,G. Kasieczka, R. Klanner, R. Kogler, V. Kutzner, J. Lange, T. Lange, A. Malara, A. Nigamova,K.J. Pena Rodriguez, O. Rieger, P. Schleper, M. Schroder, J. Schwandt, D. Schwarz, J. Sonneveld,H. Stadie, G. Steinbruck, A. Tews, B. Vormwald, I. Zoi

Karlsruher Institut fuer Technologie, Karlsruhe, GermanyJ. Bechtel, T. Berger, E. Butz, R. Caspart, T. Chwalek, W. De Boer, A. Dierlamm, A. Droll,K. El Morabit, N. Faltermann, K. Floh, M. Giffels, J.o. Gosewisch, A. Gottmann, F. Hartmann19,C. Heidecker, U. Husemann, I. Katkov24, P. Keicher, R. Koppenhofer, S. Maier, M. Metzler,S. Mitra, Th. Muller, M. Musich, M. Neukum, G. Quast, K. Rabbertz, J. Rauser, D. Savoiu,D. Schafer, M. Schnepf, D. Seith, I. Shvetsov, H.J. Simonis, R. Ulrich, J. Van Der Linden,R.F. Von Cube, M. Wassmer, M. Weber, S. Wieland, R. Wolf, S. Wozniewski, S. Wunsch

Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics (INPP), NCSR Demokritos, Aghia Paraskevi,GreeceG. Anagnostou, P. Asenov, G. Daskalakis, T. Geralis, A. Kyriakis, D. Loukas, G. Paspalaki,A. Stakia

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GreeceM. Diamantopoulou, D. Karasavvas, G. Karathanasis, P. Kontaxakis, C.K. Koraka,A. Manousakis-katsikakis, A. Panagiotou, I. Papavergou, N. Saoulidou, K. Theofilatos,E. Tziaferi, K. Vellidis, E. Vourliotis

National Technical University of Athens, Athens, GreeceG. Bakas, K. Kousouris, I. Papakrivopoulos, G. Tsipolitis, A. Zacharopoulou

University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GreeceI. Evangelou, C. Foudas, P. Gianneios, P. Katsoulis, P. Kokkas, N. Manthos, I. Papadopoulos,J. Strologas

MTA-ELTE Lendulet CMS Particle and Nuclear Physics Group, Eotvos Lorand University,Budapest, HungaryM. Csanad, M.M.A. Gadallah25, S. Lokos26, P. Major, K. Mandal, A. Mehta, G. Pasztor, A.J. Radl,O. Suranyi, G.I. Veres

Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, HungaryM. Bartok27, G. Bencze, C. Hajdu, D. Horvath28, F. Sikler, V. Veszpremi, G. Vesztergombi†

Page 17: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

15

Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI, Debrecen, HungaryS. Czellar, J. Karancsi27, J. Molnar, Z. Szillasi, D. Teyssier

Institute of Physics, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, HungaryP. Raics, Z.L. Trocsanyi29, B. Ujvari

Eszterhazy Karoly University, Karoly Robert Campus, Gyongyos, HungaryT. Csorgo30, F. Nemes30, T. Novak

Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore, IndiaS. Choudhury, J.R. Komaragiri, D. Kumar, L. Panwar, P.C. Tiwari

National Institute of Science Education and Research, HBNI, Bhubaneswar, IndiaS. Bahinipati31, D. Dash, C. Kar, P. Mal, T. Mishra, V.K. Muraleedharan Nair Bindhu32,A. Nayak32, P. Saha, N. Sur, S.K. Swain

Panjab University, Chandigarh, IndiaS. Bansal, S.B. Beri, V. Bhatnagar, G. Chaudhary, S. Chauhan, N. Dhingra33, R. Gupta, A. Kaur,S. Kaur, P. Kumari, M. Meena, K. Sandeep, J.B. Singh, A.K. Virdi

University of Delhi, Delhi, IndiaA. Ahmed, A. Bhardwaj, B.C. Choudhary, R.B. Garg, M. Gola, S. Keshri, A. Kumar,M. Naimuddin, P. Priyanka, K. Ranjan, A. Shah

Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, HBNI, Kolkata, IndiaM. Bharti34, R. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharya, D. Bhowmik, S. Dutta, S. Ghosh, B. Gomber35,M. Maity36, S. Nandan, P. Palit, P.K. Rout, G. Saha, B. Sahu, S. Sarkar, M. Sharan, B. Singh34,S. Thakur34

Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Madras, IndiaP.K. Behera, S.C. Behera, P. Kalbhor, A. Muhammad, R. Pradhan, P.R. Pujahari, A. Sharma,A.K. Sikdar

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, IndiaD. Dutta, V. Jha, V. Kumar, D.K. Mishra, K. Naskar37, P.K. Netrakanti, L.M. Pant, P. Shukla

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research-A, Mumbai, IndiaT. Aziz, S. Dugad, G.B. Mohanty, U. Sarkar

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research-B, Mumbai, IndiaS. Banerjee, S. Bhattacharya, R. Chudasama, M. Guchait, S. Karmakar, S. Kumar, G. Majumder,K. Mazumdar, S. Mukherjee, D. Roy

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, IndiaS. Dube, B. Kansal, S. Pandey, A. Rane, A. Rastogi, S. Sharma

Department of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, IranH. Bakhshiansohi38, M. Zeinali39

Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, IranS. Chenarani40, S.M. Etesami, M. Khakzad, M. Mohammadi Najafabadi

University College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandM. Felcini, M. Grunewald

INFN Sezione di Bari a, Universita di Bari b, Politecnico di Bari c, Bari, ItalyM. Abbresciaa ,b, R. Alya ,b ,41, C. Arutaa,b, A. Colaleoa, D. Creanzaa ,c, N. De Filippisa,c,

Page 18: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

16

M. De Palmaa ,b, A. Di Florioa ,b, A. Di Pilatoa,b, W. Elmetenaweea ,b, L. Fiorea, A. Gelmia ,b,M. Gula, G. Iasellia ,c, M. Incea ,b, S. Lezkia ,b, G. Maggia,c, M. Maggia, I. Margjekaa ,b,V. Mastrapasquaa,b, J.A. Merlina, S. Mya,b, S. Nuzzoa ,b, A. Pompilia ,b, G. Pugliesea ,c, A. Ranieria,G. Selvaggia ,b, L. Silvestrisa, F.M. Simonea ,b, R. Vendittia, P. Verwilligena

INFN Sezione di Bologna a, Universita di Bologna b, Bologna, ItalyG. Abbiendia, C. Battilanaa ,b, D. Bonacorsia,b, L. Borgonovia, S. Braibant-Giacomellia ,b,L. Brigliadoria, R. Campaninia ,b, P. Capiluppia ,b, A. Castroa,b, F.R. Cavalloa, C. Cioccaa,M. Cuffiania,b, G.M. Dallavallea, T. Diotalevia,b, F. Fabbria, A. Fanfania ,b, E. Fontanesia ,b,P. Giacomellia, L. Giommia,b, C. Grandia, L. Guiduccia ,b, F. Iemmia ,b, S. Lo Meoa,42,S. Marcellinia, G. Masettia, F.L. Navarriaa,b, A. Perrottaa, F. Primaveraa ,b, A.M. Rossia ,b,T. Rovellia ,b, G.P. Sirolia ,b, N. Tosia

INFN Sezione di Catania a, Universita di Catania b, Catania, ItalyS. Albergoa,b,43, S. Costaa,b,43, A. Di Mattiaa, R. Potenzaa,b, A. Tricomia,b ,43, C. Tuvea ,b

INFN Sezione di Firenze a, Universita di Firenze b, Firenze, ItalyG. Barbaglia, A. Cassesea, R. Ceccarellia ,b, V. Ciullia,b, C. Civininia, R. D’Alessandroa ,b,F. Fioria ,b, E. Focardia ,b, G. Latinoa,b, P. Lenzia,b, M. Lizzoa ,b, M. Meschinia, S. Paolettia,R. Seiditaa ,b, G. Sguazzonia, L. Viliania

INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, ItalyL. Benussi, S. Bianco, D. Piccolo

INFN Sezione di Genova a, Universita di Genova b, Genova, ItalyM. Bozzoa,b, F. Ferroa, R. Mulargiaa,b, E. Robuttia, S. Tosia,b

INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca a, Universita di Milano-Bicocca b, Milano, ItalyA. Benagliaa, F. Brivioa ,b, F. Cetorellia ,b, V. Cirioloa ,b ,19, F. De Guioa ,b, M.E. Dinardoa ,b, P. Dinia,S. Gennaia, A. Ghezzia,b, P. Govonia ,b, L. Guzzia,b, M. Malbertia, S. Malvezzia, A. Massironia,D. Menascea, F. Montia,b, L. Moronia, M. Paganonia,b, D. Pedrinia, S. Ragazzia,b, N. Redaellia,T. Tabarelli de Fatisa ,b, D. Valsecchia,b,19, D. Zuoloa,b

INFN Sezione di Napoli a, Universita di Napoli ’Federico II’ b, Napoli, Italy, Universita dellaBasilicata c, Potenza, Italy, Universita G. Marconi d, Roma, ItalyS. Buontempoa, N. Cavalloa,c, A. De Iorioa,b, F. Fabozzia ,c, A.O.M. Iorioa ,b, L. Listaa ,b,S. Meolaa ,d ,19, P. Paoluccia,19, B. Rossia, C. Sciaccaa ,b

INFN Sezione di Padova a, Universita di Padova b, Padova, Italy, Universita di Trento c,Trento, ItalyP. Azzia, N. Bacchettaa, D. Biselloa ,b, P. Bortignona, A. Bragagnoloa ,b, R. Carlina ,b, P. Checchiaa,P. De Castro Manzanoa, T. Dorigoa, F. Gasparinia,b, U. Gasparinia ,b, S.Y. Hoha,b, L. Layera ,44,M. Margonia,b, A.T. Meneguzzoa,b, M. Presillaa,b, P. Ronchesea ,b, R. Rossina,b, F. Simonettoa ,b,G. Stronga, M. Tosia ,b, H. YARARa,b, M. Zanettia,b, P. Zottoa ,b, A. Zucchettaa ,b, G. Zumerlea,b

INFN Sezione di Pavia a, Universita di Pavia b, Pavia, ItalyC. Aime‘a,b, A. Braghieria, S. Calzaferria,b, D. Fiorinaa,b, P. Montagnaa,b, S.P. Rattia ,b, V. Rea,M. Ressegottia,b, C. Riccardia,b, P. Salvinia, I. Vaia, P. Vituloa ,b

INFN Sezione di Perugia a, Universita di Perugia b, Perugia, ItalyG.M. Bileia, D. Ciangottinia,b, L. Fanoa,b, P. Laricciaa ,b, G. Mantovania,b, V. Mariania,b,M. Menichellia, F. Moscatellia, A. Piccinellia,b, A. Rossia ,b, A. Santocchiaa,b, D. Spigaa,T. Tedeschia ,b

Page 19: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

17

INFN Sezione di Pisa a, Universita di Pisa b, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa c, Pisa Italy,Universita di Siena d, Siena, ItalyP. Azzurria, G. Bagliesia, V. Bertacchia ,c, L. Bianchinia, T. Boccalia, E. Bossini, R. Castaldia,M.A. Cioccia,b, R. Dell’Orsoa, M.R. Di Domenicoa,d, S. Donatoa, A. Giassia, M.T. Grippoa,F. Ligabuea ,c, E. Mancaa ,c, G. Mandorlia,c, A. Messineoa,b, F. Pallaa, G. Ramirez-Sancheza,c,A. Rizzia,b, G. Rolandia ,c, S. Roy Chowdhurya,c, A. Scribanoa, N. Shafieia ,b, P. Spagnoloa,R. Tenchinia, G. Tonellia,b, N. Turinia,d, A. Venturia, P.G. Verdinia

INFN Sezione di Roma a, Sapienza Universita di Roma b, Rome, ItalyF. Cavallaria, M. Cipriania ,b, D. Del Rea ,b, E. Di Marcoa, M. Diemoza, E. Longoa,b, P. Meridiania,G. Organtinia ,b, F. Pandolfia, R. Paramattia ,b, C. Quarantaa,b, S. Rahatloua,b, C. Rovellia,F. Santanastasioa,b, L. Soffia,b, R. Tramontanoa,b

INFN Sezione di Torino a, Universita di Torino b, Torino, Italy, Universita del PiemonteOrientale c, Novara, ItalyN. Amapanea,b, R. Arcidiaconoa,c, S. Argiroa,b, M. Arneodoa ,c, N. Bartosika, R. Bellana ,b,A. Belloraa,b, J. Berenguer Antequeraa,b, C. Biinoa, A. Cappatia,b, N. Cartigliaa, S. Comettia,M. Costaa,b, R. Covarellia,b, N. Demariaa, B. Kiania ,b, F. Leggera, C. Mariottia, S. Masellia,E. Migliorea,b, V. Monacoa,b, E. Monteila ,b, M. Montenoa, M.M. Obertinoa,b, G. Ortonaa,L. Pachera,b, N. Pastronea, M. Pelliccionia, G.L. Pinna Angionia,b, M. Ruspaa,c, R. Salvaticoa ,b,K. Shchelinaa ,b, F. Sivieroa,b, V. Solaa, A. Solanoa,b, D. Soldia ,b, A. Staianoa, M. Tornagoa ,b,D. Trocinoa,b

INFN Sezione di Trieste a, Universita di Trieste b, Trieste, ItalyS. Belfortea, V. Candelisea ,b, M. Casarsaa, F. Cossuttia, A. Da Rolda ,b, G. Della Riccaa ,b,F. Vazzolera,b

Kyungpook National University, Daegu, KoreaS. Dogra, C. Huh, B. Kim, D.H. Kim, G.N. Kim, J. Lee, S.W. Lee, C.S. Moon, Y.D. Oh, S.I. Pak,B.C. Radburn-Smith, S. Sekmen, Y.C. Yang

Chonnam National University, Institute for Universe and Elementary Particles, Kwangju,KoreaH. Kim, D.H. Moon

Hanyang University, Seoul, KoreaB. Francois, T.J. Kim, J. Park

Korea University, Seoul, KoreaS. Cho, S. Choi, Y. Go, B. Hong, K. Lee, K.S. Lee, J. Lim, J. Park, S.K. Park, J. Yoo

Kyung Hee University, Department of Physics, Seoul, Republic of KoreaJ. Goh, A. Gurtu

Sejong University, Seoul, KoreaH.S. Kim, Y. Kim

Seoul National University, Seoul, KoreaJ. Almond, J.H. Bhyun, J. Choi, S. Jeon, J. Kim, J.S. Kim, S. Ko, H. Kwon, H. Lee, S. Lee, B.H. Oh,M. Oh, S.B. Oh, H. Seo, U.K. Yang, I. Yoon

University of Seoul, Seoul, KoreaD. Jeon, J.H. Kim, B. Ko, J.S.H. Lee, I.C. Park, Y. Roh, D. Song, I.J. Watson

Page 20: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

18

Yonsei University, Department of Physics, Seoul, KoreaS. Ha, H.D. Yoo

Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, KoreaY. Choi, Y. Jeong, H. Lee, Y. Lee, I. Yu

College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East (AUM),Dasman, KuwaitT. Beyrouthy, Y. Maghrbi

Riga Technical University, Riga, LatviaV. Veckalns45

Vilnius University, Vilnius, LithuaniaM. Ambrozas, A. Juodagalvis, A. Rinkevicius, G. Tamulaitis, A. Vaitkevicius

National Centre for Particle Physics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaW.A.T. Wan Abdullah, M.N. Yusli, Z. Zolkapli

Universidad de Sonora (UNISON), Hermosillo, MexicoJ.F. Benitez, A. Castaneda Hernandez, J.A. Murillo Quijada, L. Valencia Palomo

Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Mexico City, MexicoG. Ayala, H. Castilla-Valdez, E. De La Cruz-Burelo, I. Heredia-De La Cruz46, R. Lopez-Fernandez, C.A. Mondragon Herrera, D.A. Perez Navarro, A. Sanchez-Hernandez

Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, MexicoS. Carrillo Moreno, C. Oropeza Barrera, M. Ramirez-Garcia, F. Vazquez Valencia

Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Puebla, MexicoI. Pedraza, H.A. Salazar Ibarguen, C. Uribe Estrada

University of Montenegro, Podgorica, MontenegroJ. Mijuskovic47, N. Raicevic

University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandD. Krofcheck

University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandS. Bheesette, P.H. Butler

National Centre for Physics, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, PakistanA. Ahmad, M.I. Asghar, A. Awais, M.I.M. Awan, H.R. Hoorani, W.A. Khan, S. Qazi, M.A. Shah,M. Waqas

AGH University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science, Electronics andTelecommunications, Krakow, PolandV. Avati, L. Grzanka, M. Malawski

National Centre for Nuclear Research, Swierk, PolandH. Bialkowska, M. Bluj, B. Boimska, T. Frueboes, M. Gorski, M. Kazana, M. Szleper, P. Traczyk,P. Zalewski

Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, PolandK. Bunkowski, K. Doroba, A. Kalinowski, M. Konecki, J. Krolikowski, M. Walczak

Page 21: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

19

Laboratorio de Instrumentacao e Fısica Experimental de Partıculas, Lisboa, PortugalM. Araujo, P. Bargassa, D. Bastos, A. Boletti, P. Faccioli, M. Gallinaro, J. Hollar, N. Leonardo,T. Niknejad, J. Seixas, O. Toldaiev, J. Varela

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, RussiaS. Afanasiev, D. Budkouski, P. Bunin, M. Gavrilenko, I. Golutvin, I. Gorbunov, A. Kamenev,V. Karjavine, A. Lanev, A. Malakhov, V. Matveev48,49, V. Palichik, V. Perelygin, M. Savina,D. Seitova, V. Shalaev, S. Shmatov, S. Shulha, V. Smirnov, O. Teryaev, N. Voytishin, A. Zarubin,I. Zhizhin

Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina (St. Petersburg), RussiaG. Gavrilov, V. Golovtcov, Y. Ivanov, V. Kim50, E. Kuznetsova51, V. Murzin, V. Oreshkin,I. Smirnov, D. Sosnov, V. Sulimov, L. Uvarov, S. Volkov, A. Vorobyev

Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, RussiaYu. Andreev, A. Dermenev, S. Gninenko, N. Golubev, A. Karneyeu, M. Kirsanov, N. Krasnikov,A. Pashenkov, G. Pivovarov, D. Tlisov†, A. Toropin

Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov of NRC‘Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow, RussiaV. Epshteyn, V. Gavrilov, N. Lychkovskaya, A. Nikitenko52, V. Popov, G. Safronov,A. Spiridonov, A. Stepennov, M. Toms, E. Vlasov, A. Zhokin

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, RussiaT. Aushev

National Research Nuclear University ’Moscow Engineering Physics Institute’ (MEPhI),Moscow, RussiaO. Bychkova, M. Chadeeva53, A. Oskin, E. Popova, E. Zhemchugov53

P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, RussiaV. Andreev, M. Azarkin, I. Dremin, M. Kirakosyan, A. Terkulov

Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow,RussiaA. Belyaev, E. Boos, V. Bunichev, M. Dubinin54, L. Dudko, A. Ershov, V. Klyukhin, O. Kodolova,I. Lokhtin, S. Obraztsov, S. Petrushanko, V. Savrin, A. Snigirev

Novosibirsk State University (NSU), Novosibirsk, RussiaV. Blinov55, T. Dimova55, L. Kardapoltsev55, I. Ovtin55, Y. Skovpen55

Institute for High Energy Physics of National Research Centre ‘Kurchatov Institute’,Protvino, RussiaI. Azhgirey, I. Bayshev, V. Kachanov, A. Kalinin, D. Konstantinov, V. Petrov, R. Ryutin, A. Sobol,S. Troshin, N. Tyurin, A. Uzunian, A. Volkov

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, RussiaA. Babaev, V. Okhotnikov, L. Sukhikh

Tomsk State University, Tomsk, RussiaV. Borchsh, V. Ivanchenko, E. Tcherniaev

University of Belgrade: Faculty of Physics and VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences,Belgrade, SerbiaP. Adzic56, M. Dordevic, P. Milenovic, J. Milosevic, V. Milosevic

Page 22: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

20

Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT),Madrid, SpainM. Aguilar-Benitez, J. Alcaraz Maestre, A. Alvarez Fernandez, I. Bachiller, M. Barrio Luna,Cristina F. Bedoya, C.A. Carrillo Montoya, M. Cepeda, M. Cerrada, N. Colino, B. De La Cruz,A. Delgado Peris, J.P. Fernandez Ramos, J. Flix, M.C. Fouz, O. Gonzalez Lopez, S. Goy Lopez,J.M. Hernandez, M.I. Josa, J. Leon Holgado, D. Moran, A. Navarro Tobar, A. Perez-Calero Yzquierdo, J. Puerta Pelayo, I. Redondo, L. Romero, S. Sanchez Navas, M.S. Soares,L. Urda Gomez, C. Willmott

Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, SpainJ.F. de Troconiz, R. Reyes-Almanza

Universidad de Oviedo, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias y Tecnologıas Espaciales deAsturias (ICTEA), Oviedo, SpainB. Alvarez Gonzalez, J. Cuevas, C. Erice, J. Fernandez Menendez, S. Folgueras, I. Gonzalez Ca-ballero, E. Palencia Cortezon, C. Ramon Alvarez, J. Ripoll Sau, V. Rodrıguez Bouza, A. Trapote

Instituto de Fısica de Cantabria (IFCA), CSIC-Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, SpainJ.A. Brochero Cifuentes, I.J. Cabrillo, A. Calderon, B. Chazin Quero, J. Duarte Campderros,M. Fernandez, C. Fernandez Madrazo, P.J. Fernandez Manteca, A. Garcıa Alonso, G. Gomez,C. Martinez Rivero, P. Martinez Ruiz del Arbol, F. Matorras, J. Piedra Gomez, C. Prieels, F. Ricci-Tam, T. Rodrigo, A. Ruiz-Jimeno, L. Scodellaro, N. Trevisani, I. Vila, J.M. Vizan Garcia

University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri LankaMK Jayananda, B. Kailasapathy57, D.U.J. Sonnadara, DDC Wickramarathna

University of Ruhuna, Department of Physics, Matara, Sri LankaW.G.D. Dharmaratna, K. Liyanage, N. Perera, N. Wickramage

CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, SwitzerlandT.K. Aarrestad, D. Abbaneo, J. Alimena, E. Auffray, G. Auzinger, J. Baechler, P. Baillon†,A.H. Ball, D. Barney, J. Bendavid, N. Beni, M. Bianco, A. Bocci, E. Brondolin, T. Camporesi,M. Capeans Garrido, G. Cerminara, S.S. Chhibra, L. Cristella, D. d’Enterria, A. Dabrowski,N. Daci, A. David, A. De Roeck, M. Deile, R. Di Maria, M. Dobson, M. Dunser, N. Dupont,A. Elliott-Peisert, N. Emriskova, F. Fallavollita58, D. Fasanella, S. Fiorendi, A. Florent,G. Franzoni, J. Fulcher, W. Funk, S. Giani, D. Gigi, K. Gill, F. Glege, L. Gouskos, M. Haranko,J. Hegeman, Y. Iiyama, V. Innocente, T. James, P. Janot, J. Kaspar, J. Kieseler, M. Komm,N. Kratochwil, C. Lange, S. Laurila, P. Lecoq, K. Long, C. Lourenco, L. Malgeri, S. Mallios,M. Mannelli, F. Meijers, S. Mersi, E. Meschi, F. Moortgat, M. Mulders, S. Orfanelli, L. Orsini,F. Pantaleo, L. Pape, E. Perez, M. Peruzzi, A. Petrilli, G. Petrucciani, A. Pfeiffer, M. Pierini,M. Pitt, H. Qu, T. Quast, D. Rabady, A. Racz, M. Rieger, M. Rovere, H. Sakulin, J. Salfeld-Nebgen, S. Scarfi, C. Schafer, C. Schwick, M. Selvaggi, A. Sharma, P. Silva, W. Snoeys,P. Sphicas59, S. Summers, V.R. Tavolaro, D. Treille, A. Tsirou, G.P. Van Onsem, M. Verzetti,K.A. Wozniak, W.D. Zeuner

Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, SwitzerlandL. Caminada60, A. Ebrahimi, W. Erdmann, R. Horisberger, Q. Ingram, H.C. Kaestli, D. Kotlinski,U. Langenegger, M. Missiroli, T. Rohe

ETH Zurich - Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics (IPA), Zurich, SwitzerlandK. Androsov61, M. Backhaus, P. Berger, A. Calandri, N. Chernyavskaya, A. De Cosa,G. Dissertori, M. Dittmar, M. Donega, C. Dorfer, T. Gadek, T.A. Gomez Espinosa, C. Grab,

Page 23: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

21

D. Hits, W. Lustermann, A.-M. Lyon, R.A. Manzoni, M.T. Meinhard, F. Micheli, F. Nessi-Tedaldi, J. Niedziela, F. Pauss, V. Perovic, G. Perrin, S. Pigazzini, M.G. Ratti, M. Reichmann,C. Reissel, T. Reitenspiess, B. Ristic, D. Ruini, D.A. Sanz Becerra, M. Schonenberger, V. Stampf,J. Steggemann61, R. Wallny, D.H. Zhu

Universitat Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandC. Amsler62, C. Botta, D. Brzhechko, M.F. Canelli, A. De Wit, R. Del Burgo, J.K. Heikkila,M. Huwiler, A. Jofrehei, B. Kilminster, S. Leontsinis, A. Macchiolo, P. Meiring, V.M. Mikuni,U. Molinatti, I. Neutelings, G. Rauco, A. Reimers, P. Robmann, S. Sanchez Cruz, K. Schweiger,Y. Takahashi

National Central University, Chung-Li, TaiwanC. Adloff63, C.M. Kuo, W. Lin, A. Roy, T. Sarkar36, S.S. Yu

National Taiwan University (NTU), Taipei, TaiwanL. Ceard, P. Chang, Y. Chao, K.F. Chen, P.H. Chen, W.-S. Hou, Y.y. Li, R.-S. Lu, E. Paganis,A. Psallidas, A. Steen, E. Yazgan, P.r. Yu

Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, Bangkok, ThailandB. Asavapibhop, C. Asawatangtrakuldee, N. Srimanobhas

Cukurova University, Physics Department, Science and Art Faculty, Adana, TurkeyM.N. Bakirci64, F. Boran, S. Damarseckin65, Z.S. Demiroglu, F. Dolek, E. Eskut, G. Gokbulut,Y. Guler, I. Hos66, C. Isik, E.E. Kangal67, O. Kara, A. Kayis Topaksu, U. Kiminsu, G. Onengut,K. Ozdemir68, A. Polatoz, A.E. Simsek, B. Tali69, U.G. Tok, H. Topakli70, S. Turkcapar,I.S. Zorbakir, C. Zorbilmez

Middle East Technical University, Physics Department, Ankara, TurkeyB. Isildak71, G. Karapinar72, K. Ocalan73, M. Yalvac74

Bogazici University, Istanbul, TurkeyB. Akgun, I.O. Atakisi, E. Gulmez, M. Kaya75, O. Kaya76, O. Ozcelik, S. Tekten77, E.A. Yetkin78

Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, TurkeyA. Cakir, K. Cankocak79, Y. Komurcu, S. Sen80

Istanbul University, Istanbul, TurkeyF. Aydogmus Sen, S. Cerci69, B. Kaynak, S. Ozkorucuklu, D. Sunar Cerci69

Institute for Scintillation Materials of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kharkov,UkraineB. Grynyov

National Scientific Center, Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, Kharkov, UkraineL. Levchuk

University of Bristol, Bristol, United KingdomE. Bhal, S. Bologna, J.J. Brooke, A. Bundock, E. Clement, D. Cussans, H. Flacher, J. Goldstein,G.P. Heath, H.F. Heath, L. Kreczko, B. Krikler, S. Paramesvaran, T. Sakuma, S. Seif El Nasr-Storey, V.J. Smith, N. Stylianou81, J. Taylor, A. Titterton

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United KingdomK.W. Bell, A. Belyaev82, C. Brew, R.M. Brown, D.J.A. Cockerill, K.V. Ellis, K. Harder,S. Harper, J. Linacre, K. Manolopoulos, D.M. Newbold, E. Olaiya, D. Petyt, T. Reis, T. Schuh,C.H. Shepherd-Themistocleous, A. Thea, I.R. Tomalin, T. Williams

Page 24: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

22

Imperial College, London, United KingdomR. Bainbridge, P. Bloch, S. Bonomally, J. Borg, S. Breeze, O. Buchmuller, V. Cepaitis,G.S. Chahal83, D. Colling, P. Dauncey, G. Davies, M. Della Negra, S. Fayer, G. Fedi, G. Hall,M.H. Hassanshahi, G. Iles, J. Langford, L. Lyons, A.-M. Magnan, S. Malik, A. Martelli, J. Nash84,V. Palladino, M. Pesaresi, D.M. Raymond, A. Richards, A. Rose, E. Scott, C. Seez, A. Shtipliyski,A. Tapper, K. Uchida, T. Virdee19, N. Wardle, S.N. Webb, D. Winterbottom, A.G. Zecchinelli

Brunel University, Uxbridge, United KingdomJ.E. Cole, A. Khan, P. Kyberd, C.K. Mackay, I.D. Reid, L. Teodorescu, S. Zahid

Baylor University, Waco, USAS. Abdullin, A. Brinkerhoff, B. Caraway, J. Dittmann, K. Hatakeyama, A.R. Kanuganti,B. McMaster, N. Pastika, S. Sawant, C. Smith, C. Sutantawibul, J. Wilson

Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USAR. Bartek, A. Dominguez, R. Uniyal, A.M. Vargas Hernandez

The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USAA. Buccilli, O. Charaf, S.I. Cooper, D. Di Croce, S.V. Gleyzer, C. Henderson, C.U. Perez,P. Rumerio, C. West

Boston University, Boston, USAA. Akpinar, A. Albert, D. Arcaro, C. Cosby, Z. Demiragli, D. Gastler, J. Rohlf, K. Salyer,D. Sperka, D. Spitzbart, I. Suarez, S. Yuan, D. Zou

Brown University, Providence, USAG. Benelli, B. Burkle, X. Coubez20, D. Cutts, Y.t. Duh, M. Hadley, U. Heintz, J.M. Hogan85,K.H.M. Kwok, E. Laird, G. Landsberg, K.T. Lau, J. Lee, J. Luo, M. Narain, S. Sagir86, E. Usai,W.Y. Wong, X. Yan, D. Yu, W. Zhang

University of California, Davis, Davis, USAC. Brainerd, R. Breedon, M. Calderon De La Barca Sanchez, M. Chertok, J. Conway, P.T. Cox,R. Erbacher, F. Jensen, O. Kukral, R. Lander, M. Mulhearn, D. Pellett, D. Taylor, M. Tripathi,Y. Yao, F. Zhang

University of California, Los Angeles, USAM. Bachtis, R. Cousins, A. Dasgupta, A. Datta, D. Hamilton, J. Hauser, M. Ignatenko,M.A. Iqbal, T. Lam, N. Mccoll, W.A. Nash, S. Regnard, D. Saltzberg, C. Schnaible, B. Stone,V. Valuev

University of California, Riverside, Riverside, USAK. Burt, Y. Chen, R. Clare, J.W. Gary, G. Hanson, G. Karapostoli, O.R. Long, N. Manganelli,M. Olmedo Negrete, W. Si, S. Wimpenny, Y. Zhang

University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USAJ.G. Branson, P. Chang, S. Cittolin, S. Cooperstein, N. Deelen, J. Duarte, R. Gerosa, L. Giannini,D. Gilbert, J. Guiang, V. Krutelyov, R. Lee, J. Letts, M. Masciovecchio, S. May, S. Padhi, M. Pieri,B.V. Sathia Narayanan, V. Sharma, M. Tadel, A. Vartak, F. Wurthwein, Y. Xiang, A. Yagil

University of California, Santa Barbara - Department of Physics, Santa Barbara, USAN. Amin, C. Campagnari, M. Citron, A. Dorsett, V. Dutta, J. Incandela, M. Kilpatrick, B. Marsh,H. Mei, A. Ovcharova, M. Quinnan, J. Richman, U. Sarica, D. Stuart, S. Wang

Page 25: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

23

California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USAA. Bornheim, O. Cerri, I. Dutta, J.M. Lawhorn, N. Lu, J. Mao, H.B. Newman, J. Ngadiuba,T.Q. Nguyen, M. Spiropulu, J.R. Vlimant, C. Wang, S. Xie, Z. Zhang, R.Y. Zhu

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USAJ. Alison, M.B. Andrews, T. Ferguson, T. Mudholkar, M. Paulini, I. Vorobiev

University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USAJ.P. Cumalat, W.T. Ford, E. MacDonald, R. Patel, A. Perloff, K. Stenson, K.A. Ulmer, S.R. Wagner

Cornell University, Ithaca, USAJ. Alexander, Y. Cheng, J. Chu, D.J. Cranshaw, K. Mcdermott, J. Monroy, J.R. Patterson,D. Quach, A. Ryd, W. Sun, S.M. Tan, Z. Tao, J. Thom, P. Wittich, M. Zientek

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, USAM. Albrow, M. Alyari, G. Apollinari, A. Apresyan, A. Apyan, S. Banerjee, L.A.T. Bauerdick,A. Beretvas, D. Berry, J. Berryhill, P.C. Bhat, K. Burkett, J.N. Butler, A. Canepa, G.B. Cerati,H.W.K. Cheung, F. Chlebana, M. Cremonesi, K.F. Di Petrillo, V.D. Elvira, J. Freeman,Z. Gecse, L. Gray, D. Green, S. Grunendahl, O. Gutsche, R.M. Harris, R. Heller, T.C. Herwig,J. Hirschauer, B. Jayatilaka, S. Jindariani, M. Johnson, U. Joshi, P. Klabbers, T. Klijnsma,B. Klima, M.J. Kortelainen, S. Lammel, D. Lincoln, R. Lipton, T. Liu, J. Lykken, C. Madrid,K. Maeshima, C. Mantilla, D. Mason, P. McBride, P. Merkel, S. Mrenna, S. Nahn, V. O’Dell,V. Papadimitriou, K. Pedro, C. Pena54, O. Prokofyev, F. Ravera, A. Reinsvold Hall, L. Ristori,B. Schneider, E. Sexton-Kennedy, N. Smith, A. Soha, L. Spiegel, S. Stoynev, J. Strait, L. Taylor,S. Tkaczyk, N.V. Tran, L. Uplegger, E.W. Vaandering, H.A. Weber, A. Woodard

University of Florida, Gainesville, USAD. Acosta, P. Avery, D. Bourilkov, L. Cadamuro, V. Cherepanov, F. Errico, R.D. Field,D. Guerrero, B.M. Joshi, M. Kim, J. Konigsberg, A. Korytov, K.H. Lo, K. Matchev, N. Menendez,G. Mitselmakher, D. Rosenzweig, K. Shi, J. Sturdy, J. Wang, E. Yigitbasi, X. Zuo

Florida State University, Tallahassee, USAT. Adams, A. Askew, D. Diaz, R. Habibullah, S. Hagopian, V. Hagopian, K.F. Johnson,R. Khurana, T. Kolberg, G. Martinez, H. Prosper, C. Schiber, R. Yohay, J. Zhang

Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, USAM.M. Baarmand, S. Butalla, T. Elkafrawy13, M. Hohlmann, R. Kumar Verma, D. Noonan,M. Rahmani, M. Saunders, F. Yumiceva

University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC), Chicago, USAM.R. Adams, L. Apanasevich, H. Becerril Gonzalez, R. Cavanaugh, X. Chen, S. Dittmer,O. Evdokimov, C.E. Gerber, D.A. Hangal, D.J. Hofman, C. Mills, G. Oh, T. Roy, M.B. Tonjes,N. Varelas, J. Viinikainen, X. Wang, Z. Wu, Z. Ye

The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USAM. Alhusseini, K. Dilsiz87, S. Durgut, R.P. Gandrajula, M. Haytmyradov, V. Khristenko,O.K. Koseyan, J.-P. Merlo, A. Mestvirishvili88, A. Moeller, J. Nachtman, H. Ogul89, Y. Onel,F. Ozok90, A. Penzo, C. Snyder, E. Tiras91, J. Wetzel

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USAO. Amram, B. Blumenfeld, L. Corcodilos, M. Eminizer, A.V. Gritsan, S. Kyriacou,P. Maksimovic, J. Roskes, M. Swartz, T.A. Vami

The University of Kansas, Lawrence, USAC. Baldenegro Barrera, P. Baringer, A. Bean, A. Bylinkin, T. Isidori, S. Khalil, J. King,

Page 26: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

24

G. Krintiras, A. Kropivnitskaya, C. Lindsey, N. Minafra, M. Murray, C. Rogan, C. Royon,S. Sanders, E. Schmitz, J.D. Tapia Takaki, Q. Wang, J. Williams, G. Wilson

Kansas State University, Manhattan, USAS. Duric, A. Ivanov, K. Kaadze, D. Kim, Y. Maravin, T. Mitchell, A. Modak, K. Nam

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, USAF. Rebassoo, D. Wright

University of Maryland, College Park, USAE. Adams, A. Baden, O. Baron, A. Belloni, S.C. Eno, Y. Feng, N.J. Hadley, S. Jabeen, R.G. Kellogg,T. Koeth, A.C. Mignerey, S. Nabili, M. Seidel, A. Skuja, S.C. Tonwar, L. Wang, K. Wong

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USAD. Abercrombie, R. Bi, S. Brandt, W. Busza, I.A. Cali, Y. Chen, M. D’Alfonso, G. Gomez Ce-ballos, M. Goncharov, P. Harris, M. Hu, M. Klute, D. Kovalskyi, J. Krupa, Y.-J. Lee, B. Maier,A.C. Marini, C. Mironov, C. Paus, D. Rankin, C. Roland, G. Roland, Z. Shi, G.S.F. Stephans,K. Tatar, J. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Wyslouch

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USAR.M. Chatterjee, A. Evans, P. Hansen, J. Hiltbrand, Sh. Jain, M. Krohn, Y. Kubota, Z. Lesko,J. Mans, M. Revering, R. Rusack, R. Saradhy, N. Schroeder, N. Strobbe, M.A. Wadud

University of Mississippi, Oxford, USAJ.G. Acosta, S. Oliveros

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, USAK. Bloom, M. Bryson, S. Chauhan, D.R. Claes, C. Fangmeier, L. Finco, F. Golf,J.R. Gonzalez Fernandez, C. Joo, I. Kravchenko, J.E. Siado, G.R. Snow†, W. Tabb, F. Yan

State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USAG. Agarwal, H. Bandyopadhyay, L. Hay, I. Iashvili, A. Kharchilava, C. McLean, D. Nguyen,J. Pekkanen, S. Rappoccio, A. Williams

Northeastern University, Boston, USAG. Alverson, E. Barberis, C. Freer, Y. Haddad, A. Hortiangtham, J. Li, G. Madigan, B. Marzocchi,D.M. Morse, V. Nguyen, T. Orimoto, A. Parker, L. Skinnari, A. Tishelman-Charny, T. Wamorkar,B. Wang, A. Wisecarver, D. Wood

Northwestern University, Evanston, USAS. Bhattacharya, J. Bueghly, Z. Chen, A. Gilbert, T. Gunter, K.A. Hahn, N. Odell, M.H. Schmitt,K. Sung, M. Velasco

University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, USAR. Band, R. Bucci, N. Dev, R. Goldouzian, M. Hildreth, K. Hurtado Anampa, C. Jessop,K. Lannon, N. Loukas, N. Marinelli, I. Mcalister, F. Meng, K. Mohrman, Y. Musienko48,R. Ruchti, P. Siddireddy, M. Wayne, A. Wightman, M. Wolf, M. Zarucki, L. Zygala

The Ohio State University, Columbus, USAB. Bylsma, B. Cardwell, L.S. Durkin, B. Francis, C. Hill, A. Lefeld, B.L. Winer, B.R. Yates

Princeton University, Princeton, USAF.M. Addesa, B. Bonham, P. Das, G. Dezoort, P. Elmer, A. Frankenthal, B. Greenberg,N. Haubrich, S. Higginbotham, A. Kalogeropoulos, G. Kopp, S. Kwan, D. Lange, M.T. Lucchini,D. Marlow, K. Mei, I. Ojalvo, J. Olsen, C. Palmer, D. Stickland, C. Tully

Page 27: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

25

University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, USAS. Malik, S. Norberg

Purdue University, West Lafayette, USAA.S. Bakshi, V.E. Barnes, R. Chawla, S. Das, L. Gutay, M. Jones, A.W. Jung, S. Karmarkar,M. Liu, G. Negro, N. Neumeister, C.C. Peng, S. Piperov, A. Purohit, J.F. Schulte, M. Stojanovic16,J. Thieman, F. Wang, R. Xiao, W. Xie

Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, USAJ. Dolen, N. Parashar

Rice University, Houston, USAA. Baty, S. Dildick, K.M. Ecklund, S. Freed, F.J.M. Geurts, A. Kumar, W. Li, B.P. Padley,R. Redjimi, J. Roberts†, W. Shi, A.G. Stahl Leiton

University of Rochester, Rochester, USAA. Bodek, P. de Barbaro, R. Demina, J.L. Dulemba, C. Fallon, T. Ferbel, M. Galanti, A. Garcia-Bellido, O. Hindrichs, A. Khukhunaishvili, E. Ranken, R. Taus

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, USAB. Chiarito, J.P. Chou, A. Gandrakota, Y. Gershtein, E. Halkiadakis, A. Hart, M. Heindl,E. Hughes, S. Kaplan, O. Karacheban23, I. Laflotte, A. Lath, R. Montalvo, K. Nash, M. Osherson,S. Salur, S. Schnetzer, S. Somalwar, R. Stone, S.A. Thayil, S. Thomas, H. Wang

University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USAH. Acharya, A.G. Delannoy, S. Spanier

Texas A&M University, College Station, USAO. Bouhali92, M. Dalchenko, A. Delgado, R. Eusebi, J. Gilmore, T. Huang, T. Kamon93, H. Kim,S. Luo, S. Malhotra, R. Mueller, D. Overton, D. Rathjens, A. Safonov

Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USAN. Akchurin, J. Damgov, V. Hegde, S. Kunori, K. Lamichhane, S.W. Lee, T. Mengke,S. Muthumuni, T. Peltola, S. Undleeb, I. Volobouev, Z. Wang, A. Whitbeck

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USAE. Appelt, S. Greene, A. Gurrola, W. Johns, C. Maguire, A. Melo, H. Ni, K. Padeken, F. Romeo,P. Sheldon, S. Tuo, J. Velkovska

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USAM.W. Arenton, B. Cox, G. Cummings, J. Hakala, R. Hirosky, M. Joyce, A. Ledovskoy, A. Li,C. Neu, B. Tannenwald, E. Wolfe

Wayne State University, Detroit, USAP.E. Karchin, N. Poudyal, P. Thapa

University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USAK. Black, T. Bose, J. Buchanan, C. Caillol, S. Dasu, I. De Bruyn, P. Everaerts, F. Fienga,C. Galloni, H. He, M. Herndon, A. Herve, U. Hussain, A. Lanaro, A. Loeliger, R. Loveless,J. Madhusudanan Sreekala, A. Mallampalli, A. Mohammadi, D. Pinna, A. Savin, V. Shang,V. Sharma, W.H. Smith, D. Teague, S. Trembath-reichert, W. Vetens

†: Deceased1: Also at Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria2: Also at Institute of Basic and Applied Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Arab Academy forScience, Technology and Maritime Transport, Alexandria, Egypt, Alexandria, Egypt

Page 28: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

26

3: Also at Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium4: Also at Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil5: Also at Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil6: Also at University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China7: Also at Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, Beijing, China8: Also at UFMS, Nova Andradina, Brazil9: Also at Nanjing Normal University Department of Physics, Nanjing, China10: Now at The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA11: Also at Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A.I. Alikhanov ofNRC ‘Kurchatov Institute’, Moscow, Russia12: Also at Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia13: Also at Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt14: Also at Zewail City of Science and Technology, Zewail, Egypt15: Also at British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt16: Also at Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA17: Also at Universite de Haute Alsace, Mulhouse, France18: Also at Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey19: Also at CERN, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland20: Also at RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany21: Also at University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany22: Also at Department of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, Isfahan,Iran23: Also at Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Germany24: Also at Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University,Moscow, Russia25: Also at Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt26: Also at Eszterhazy Karoly University, Karoly Robert Campus, Gyongyos, Hungary27: Also at Institute of Physics, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, Debrecen,Hungary28: Also at Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI, Debrecen, Hungary29: Also at MTA-ELTE Lendulet CMS Particle and Nuclear Physics Group, Eotvos LorandUniversity, Budapest, Hungary, Budapest, Hungary30: Also at Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary31: Also at IIT Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India, Bhubaneswar, India32: Also at Institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar, India33: Also at G.H.G. Khalsa College, Punjab, India34: Also at Shoolini University, Solan, India35: Also at University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India36: Also at University of Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, India37: Also at Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mumbai, India38: Also at Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany39: Also at Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran40: Also at Department of Physics, University of Science and Technology of Mazandaran,Behshahr, Iran41: Now at INFN Sezione di Bari a, Universita di Bari b, Politecnico di Bari c, Bari, Italy42: Also at Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable EconomicDevelopment, Bologna, Italy43: Also at Centro Siciliano di Fisica Nucleare e di Struttura Della Materia, Catania, Italy44: Also at Universita di Napoli ’Federico II’, NAPOLI, Italy

Page 29: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

27

45: Also at Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia, Riga, Latvia46: Also at Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologıa, Mexico City, Mexico47: Also at IRFU, CEA, Universite Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France48: Also at Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia49: Now at National Research Nuclear University ’Moscow Engineering Physics Institute’(MEPhI), Moscow, Russia50: Also at St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia51: Also at University of Florida, Gainesville, USA52: Also at Imperial College, London, United Kingdom53: Also at P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia54: Also at California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA55: Also at Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia56: Also at Faculty of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia57: Also at Trincomalee Campus, Eastern University, Sri Lanka, Nilaveli, Sri Lanka58: Also at INFN Sezione di Pavia a, Universita di Pavia b, Pavia, Italy, Pavia, Italy59: Also at National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece60: Also at Universitat Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland61: Also at Ecole Polytechnique Federale Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland62: Also at Stefan Meyer Institute for Subatomic Physics, Vienna, Austria, Vienna, Austria63: Also at Laboratoire d’Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules, IN2P3-CNRS, Annecy-le-Vieux, France64: Also at Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey65: Also at Sırnak University, Sirnak, Turkey66: Also at Istanbul University - Cerraphasa, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey67: Also at Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey68: Also at Piri Reis University, Istanbul, Turkey69: Also at Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey70: Also at Tarsus University, MERSIN, Turkey71: Also at Ozyegin University, Istanbul, Turkey72: Also at Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey73: Also at Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey74: Also at Bozok Universitetesi Rektorlugu, Yozgat, Turkey, Yozgat, Turkey75: Also at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey76: Also at Milli Savunma University, Istanbul, Turkey77: Also at Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey78: Also at Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey79: Also at Near East University, Research Center of Experimental Health Science, Nicosia,Turkey80: Also at Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey81: Also at Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium82: Also at School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton,United Kingdom83: Also at IPPP Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom84: Also at Monash University, Faculty of Science, Clayton, Australia85: Also at Bethel University, St. Paul, Minneapolis, USA, St. Paul, USA86: Also at Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey87: Also at Bingol University, Bingol, Turkey88: Also at Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia89: Also at Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey

Page 30: Measurement of Wg p proton-proton collisions at effective ...The associated production of a W boson and a photon in proton-proton (pp) collisions cor-responds to a fundamental process

28

90: Also at Mimar Sinan University, Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey91: Also at Erciyes University, KAYSERI, Turkey92: Also at Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar93: Also at Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Daegu, Korea


Recommended