12/05/2017
1
*
Measures of Polarization andConceptualization of Middle Class
• The EGR strategy generates brackets of incomeclasses of the income distribution observed in practice. The brackets chosen were the ones whichbetter distinguish the 3 groups in a sense that theyselect the lowest possible differences inside them(identification) and on the other hand maximize thedifferences between groups (alienation). Wecalculated the brackets of income for the case of 3 segments (AB, C e DE) .
12/05/2017
2
CORTES E MEDIDAS DE DESIGUALDADE - ÍNDICE DE THEIL
% da desigualdade explicada pelo ENTRE segmentos de renda
CLASSES
ECONOMICAS
CPS/FGV
GRUPOS % IGUAIS
(1/3)
PME 2002-2003 76.71% 59.34%
PNAD 2003 79.71% 59.91%
PNAD 2009 74.29% 57.96%
POF 2008-2009 71.40% 59.29%
Fonte: CPS/FGV a partir dos microdados do IBGE
Explanatory Power of Economic Classes Segmentation: EGR x Equal Sizes
K
h
hhe TYTT1
Te / T is the Contribution of economic
classes brackets to inequality
Economic Classes Defined by Total Household
Income (calculated originally in per capita terms) (Monthly R$)
Economic
ClassesLower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Class E 0 1564
Class D 1565 2500
Class C 2501 10776
Class B 10777 14045
Class A 14046 -Source: PNAD/IBGE and POF/IBGE microdata * R$ September 2016 prices
Self-perceptions on Class – in 2014 how does Brazilians ranked thenselves in terms of economic class, ranging from extremely poor to the elite, passing by people who call themselves vulnerable and several middle class bands (low, medium and high). The self-perception of the whole middle class (share in ABC classes) by Brazilians is 62.76 per cent, higher than the 58.68 per cent in PNAD for 2014.
<-New Middle Class
<-Traditional MiddleClass (A+B) More US
style
12/05/2017
3
Global income distributions in 1988 (Twin Peaks) and 2011 (less polarized)
Branko Milanovic
twoway (kdensity loginc_11_11 [w=popu] if loginc_11_11>2 & year==1988, bwidth(0.14) title("Figure 3. Global income dstribution in 1988 and 2011")) (kdensityloginc_11_11 [w=popu] if loginc_11_11>2 & year==2011, bwidth(0.2)) , legend(off) xtitle(log of annual PPP real income) ytitle(density) text(0.78 2.5 "1988") text(0.65 3.5 "2011") xlabel(2.477"300" 3"1000" 3.477"3000" 4"10000" 4.699"50000", labsize(small) angle(90))Using Branko\Income_inequality\final11\combine88_08_11_new.dta
1988
2011
0.2
.4.6
.8
den
sity
300
100
0
300
0
100
00
500
00
log of annual PPP real income
Figure 3. Global income dstribution in 1988 and 2011
Emerging global “middle class” between $3 and $16
Global Income Distribution 2011 (2005 international dollars)
Source: Lakner and Milanovic 2015
China is Bridging the Twin Peaks
12/05/2017
4
Source: SECOM – Quarterly Public Perception Poll – July/2014
Acquisition of Goods and Services
Acquired this good or service in the last 3 years (%)?
2.15%
6.34%8.39% 8.59% 8.74%
11.89% 12.44%
21.23%24.5%
38.41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
1st Acquisition of Goods and Services
*only takes into account the ones who adquiredthe good or service in the last 3 years
33.61% 35.29% 37.21% 38.88%
46.19% 47.67% 49.49%
64.57% 65.48%
74.80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
1st time acquiring goods or services: Among thosewho purchased it in the last 3 years
Source: SAE designed questions in SECOM – Quarterly Public Perception Poll – July/2014
Idea of the New Middle Class
12/05/2017
5
% Classe ABC
8,9 - 19,6
19,6 - 30,3
30,3 - 40,9
40,9 - 51,6
51,6 - 62,2
62,2 - 72,9
72,9 - 83,5
83,5 - 94,2
% in Class ABC - By Municipalities
www.fgv.br/cps
Source: FGV Social/CPS from Demographic Census 2010/IBGE
% Access to Cars
Acesso Carros
0 - 12.5
12.5 - 25
25 - 37.5
37.5 - 50
50 - 62.5
62.5 - 75
75 - 87.5
87.5 - 100
Acesso Motos
0 - 12.5
12.5 - 25
25 - 37.5
37.5 - 50
50 - 62.5
62.5 - 75
75 - 87.5
87.5 - 100
% Access to Motorcycles
Source: FGV Social/CPS from Demographic Census 2010/IBGE
12/05/2017
6
% Classe AB
0,3 - 5,6
5,6 - 10,9
10,9 - 16,2
16,2 - 21,6
21,6 - 26,9
26,9 - 32,2
32,2 - 37,6
37,6 - 42,9
% in Class AB
www.fgv.br/cps
Source: FGV Social/CPS from Demographic Census 2010/IBGE
Acesso Internet
0 - 8.8
8.8 - 17.5
17.5 - 26.3
26.3 - 35
35 - 43.8
43.8 - 52.5
52.5 - 61.3
61.3 - 70
Home Access to the Internet
Source: FGV Social/CPS from Demographic Census 2010/IBGE
12/05/2017
7
% Classe A
0 - 3,8
3,8 - 7,7
7,7 - 11,5
11,5 - 15,3
15,3 - 19,2
19,2 - 23
23 - 26,8
26,8 - 30,7
Retratos Locais - % Classe A
www.fgv.br/cps/brics
www.fgv.br/cps
Source: FGV Social/CPS from Demographic Census 2010/IBGE
% in AB Classes X Mean Per Capita Household Income(including the ones with no income)
www.fgv.br/cps/brics
Mean Per Capita Household Income
% in
AB
Cla
sse
s
Source: FGV Social/CPS from Demographic Census 2010/IBGE
12/05/2017
8
A1 Class Map
Brazilian Municipalities
Rank Municipality State A1 %
1 Niterói RJ 17.61%
2 Santana de Parnaíba SP 16.515%
3 Vitória ES 15.06%
4 Florianópolis SC 14.90%
5 São Caetano do Sul SP 14.75%
6 Brasília DF 14.01%
7 Porto Alegre RS 13.24%
8 Nova Lima MG 11.64%
9 Santos SP 11.13%
10 Balneário Camboriú SC 10.76%
11 Belo Horizonte MG 10.71%
12 Curitiba PR 10.47%
13 Vinhedo SP 10.46%
14Presidente Castello Branco
SC 10.38%
15 Rio Fortuna SC 10.37%
16 Rio de Janeiro RJ 10.27%
17 Valinhos SP 10.24%
18 São Paulo SP 9.46%
19 Campinas SP 9.24%
20 Holambra SP 9.13%
21 Águas de São Pedro SP 8.83%
Source: FGV Social/CPS from Demographic Census 2010/IBGE
Rank District from São Paulo A1 %
1 Moema 61%
2 Jardim Paulista 54%
3 Itaim Bibi 51%
4 Alto de Pinheiros 49%
5 Perdizes 49%
6 Vila Mariana 48%
7 Pinheiros 46%
8 Morumbi 45%
9 Consolação 44%
10 Campo Belo 42%
11 Santo Amaro 39%
12 Vila Leopoldina 37%
13 Saúde 34%
14 Barra Funda 33%
15 Bela Vista 31%
A1 Class Map
São Paulo Municipality Districts
Source: CPS/FGV from Census 2010/IBGE microdata
12/05/2017
9
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
C
AB
D
E
Geologic Layers of Classes – Brazilwww.fgv.br/fgvsocial
Economic Classes % Composition 1992 to 2015
Source: FGV Social/CPS from PNAD/IBGE microdata
% Evolution of ABC Classes (Traditional and New Middle Classes)
% Classe ABC 1993
13.01 - 28.32
28.32 - 43.63
43.63 - 58.93
58.93 - 74.24
74.24 - 89.55
1993
% Classe ABC 2003
13.01 - 28.32
28.32 - 43.63
43.63 - 58.93
58.93 - 74.24
74.24 - 89.55
2003
% Classe ABC 2009
13.01 - 28.32
28.32 - 43.63
43.63 - 58.93
58.93 - 74.24
74.24 - 89.55
2009
% Classe ABC 1995
13.01 - 28.32
28.32 - 43.63
43.63 - 58.93
58.93 - 74.24
74.24 - 89.55
1995
% Classe ABC 2014
13.01 - 28.32
28.32 - 43.63
43.63 - 58.93
58.93 - 74.24
74.24 - 89.55
2014
Source: FGV Social/CPS from PNAD/IBGE microdata
12/05/2017
10
Past Class Projections
AB Class - %
Source: CPS/FGV from PNAD/IBGE microdata
7,6
7,71 8,
32
9,4 9,
74 10,4
1
10,6
1
12,8
7 13,8
2
14,8
5
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
14,09
Projections with microdata up to 2009
(2011) Pag. 95
2003 2011 2014 2015
97.003.663
66.986.468 56.329.107
62.234.778
66.469.251 103.538.532 118.315.456 116.659.540
13.409.106 21.835.049 28.144.276
25.576.776
Classe DE Classe C Classe AB
Economic Classes Pyramid
Source: FGV Social/CPS from PNAD/IBGE microdata
12/05/2017
11
RDPC Growth 2000 / 2010 UDHs* (Rio de Janeiro Metro Region)
2000
www.fgv.br/fgvsocial
21
* Great Rio is divided in 2200 Unidades de Desenvolvimento Humano (UDHs)
Richer City Core = Cariocas
2010
www.fgv.br/fgvsocial
22
RDPC Growth 2000 / 2010 UDHs* (Rio de Janeiro Metro Region)
* Great Rio is divided in 2200 Unidades de Desenvolvimento Humano (UDHs)
Booming Perypheries
12/05/2017
12
From Boom to Crisis in the Great Rio-0
,02
%
-1,2
9%
-3,9
3%
-4,9
8%
-5,9
7%
-5,3
2% -2,6
5%
5,1
4%
11
,01
%
4,2
8%
2,0
9%
0,2
9%
-3,8
7%
-3,4
8%
13
,52
%
10
,09
%
1,0
8%
-6,8
0%
-10
,71
%
-10
,07
%
-10
,31
%
-15,00%
-10,00%
-5,00%
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20
15
2T
20
15
3T
20
15
4T
20
16
1T
20
16
2T
20
16
3T
20
16
4T
VARIAÇÃO ANUAL DA RENDA
TotalRJ EstadoRJ Periferia
www.fgv.br/fgvsocial
Labor Ingredients of the Crisis
Renda +
por Anos
de Estudo
Anos de
Estudo
Taxa de
Ocupação
na PEA
x x x
1504 1098 178 9,80 0,88 0,71
1604 1067 173 10,12 0,85 0,71
Var (%) -2,83 -2,89 3,29 -3,23 0,10
1504 1221 181 10,61 0,91 0,70
1604 1193 182 10,77 0,85 0,71
Var (%) -2,27 0,55 1,54 -5,59 1,38
1504 941 154 10,06 0,88 0,69
1604 842 144 10,22 0,82 0,69
Var (%) -10,47 -6,38 1,52 -6,61 0,89
O que Explica a Queda de Renda nos Últimos 12 Meses?
Categoria Ano Tri
Renda de
Todos
Trabalhos
=
Participação
no Mercado
de Trabalho
Grande
Rio
Entorno
Brasil
Rio de
Janeiro -
Estado
-2,25%
-2,31%
+2,39%
Equity
12/05/2017
13
Copyright © marcelo neri
<-Office and ICTs
Northeast->
Demand Determination:Sales, Sectors & States
212,59
189,39
90
110
130
150
170
190
210
230
ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
jul… ja…
Volume de Vendas no Comércio Varejista (Outubro de 2003=100) Até abril de 2016
www.fgv.br/fgvsocial
Sales Evolution: Boom and Burst
12/05/2017
14
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
ou
t/0
3ja
n/0
4ab
r/0
4ju
l/04
ou
t/0
4ja
n/0
5ab
r/0
5ju
l/05
ou
t/0
5ja
n/0
6ab
r/0
6ju
l/06
ou
t/0
6ja
n/0
7ab
r/0
7ju
l/07
ou
t/0
7ja
n/0
8ab
r/0
8ju
l/08
ou
t/0
8ja
n/0
9ab
r/0
9ju
l/09
ou
t/0
9ja
n/1
0ab
r/1
0ju
l/10
ou
t/1
0ja
n/1
1ab
r/1
1ju
l/11
ou
t/1
1ja
n/1
2ab
r/1
2ju
l/12
ou
t/1
2ja
n/1
3ab
r/1
3ju
l/13
ou
t/1
3ja
n/1
4ab
r/1
4ju
l/14
ou
t/1
4ja
n/1
5ab
r/1
5ju
l/15
ou
t/1
5ja
n/1
6ab
r/1
6
Combustíveis e lubrificantes
Hipermercados, supermercados, produtosalimentícios, bebidas e fumoHipermercados e supermercados
Tecidos, vestuário e calçados
Volume de Vendas no Comércio Varejista por Setores(Outubro de 2003=100)
www.fgv.br/fgvsocial
Sectoral Sales Evolution: Boom and Burst
80
130
180
230
280
330
380
ou
t/0
3ja
n/0
4ab
r/0
4ju
l/04
ou
t/0
4ja
n/0
5ab
r/0
5ju
l/05
ou
t/0
5ja
n/0
6ab
r/0
6ju
l/06
ou
t/0
6ja
n/0
7ab
r/0
7ju
l/07
ou
t/0
7ja
n/0
8ab
r/0
8ju
l/08
ou
t/0
8ja
n/0
9ab
r/0
9ju
l/09
ou
t/0
9ja
n/1
0ab
r/1
0ju
l/10
ou
t/1
0ja
n/1
1ab
r/1
1ju
l/11
ou
t/1
1ja
n/1
2ab
r/1
2ju
l/12
ou
t/1
2ja
n/1
3ab
r/1
3ju
l/13
ou
t/1
3ja
n/1
4ab
r/1
4ju
l/14
ou
t/1
4ja
n/1
5ab
r/1
5ju
l/15
ou
t/1
5ja
n/1
6ab
r/1
6
Combustíveis e lubrificantes
Hipermercados, supermercados, produtosalimentícios, bebidas e fumoHipermercados e supermercados
Tecidos, vestuário e calçados
Materiais de construção
Veículos, motos, partes e peças
Móveis e eletrodomésticos
Volume de Vendas no Comércio Varejista por Setores(Outubro de 2003=100)
abr/16 Desde 2014
Combustíveis 111,1 -14,4%
Superm, bebidas 173,7 -4,7% Básico
Hipermercados 173,4 -4,8% Básico
Artigos farmaceuticos 259,2 -0,7% Básico
Veiculos e peças 162,3 -31,2% Crédito
Móveis e eletrodom 257,5 -25,4% Crédito
Mat de Construção 134,2 -18,2% Crédito
Vestuário e calçados 124,4 -20,4%
Livros e papelaria 117,6 -27,6%
Escritorio e TICs 537,1 -18,9%
Artigos (uso pessoal) 306,0 -12,6%
Total 189,4 -10,9%
www.fgv.br/fgvsocial
Sectoral Sales Evolution: Boom and Burst
12/05/2017
15
What Explains Sales? GDP or HH Income?Mean, Inequality or Both?
29
microdados da PME/IBGE Renda Habitual 15 a 60 anos per capitaVendas reais no comércio PMC/IBGE em logs
y = 1,6499x - 6,2715R² = 0,8688
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
5,00
5,50
6,10 6,20 6,30 6,40 6,50 6,60 6,70 6,80
lnSales x ln Household Income
y = -5,537x + 1,4034R² = 0,8336
3,60
3,80
4,00
4,20
4,40
4,60
4,80
5,00
5,20
-0,63 -0,61 -0,59 -0,57 -0,55 -0,53 -0,51 -0,49 -0,47 -0,45
Ln Sales x Ln GINI
y = 1,1915x - 2,2625R² = 0,8819
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
5,00
5,50
5,00 5,20 5,40 5,60 5,80 6,00
LN Sales x Ln Social Welfare
y = 1,9345x - 5,2555R² = 0,8595
3,00
3,50
4,00
4,50
5,00
5,50
4,7 4,8 4,9 5 5,1 5,2
lnSales x ln GDP Desaz 2003 to 2015
www.fgv.br/fgvsocial
60
50
20
10
93 94 95 98 99 00 01 20121992
70
096 97 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
40
30
Coverage of Basic Goods and Services
Conditions in Houses improved than public services out
Gro
wth
(%)
Pop. with basic set of durable goods X Pop. with basic set of public services
11.06
28.23
44.43
46.60
40.58
51.14
58.26
59.23
+
Notes:
* = telephone (landline or mobile), color TV, stove with two burners or +, refrigerator, radio and washing machine** = electricity, garbage collection, sewage (rede ou fossa ligada à rede), water (rede).
Source: Pnad/IBGE microdata. Excluding rural areas of the North region (except Tocantins).
Perceived Policies – Household Budget Survey POF/IBGEshows that the perception of the C class on the problems ofinfrastructure & public services such as transport,sports, leisure
, education and health, is more on quality than on coverage
12/05/2017
16
% AAP % w Professional Courses
www.fgv.br/cps
Formal Jobs % in Middle Class
Work and Study
Main Symbol of C Class
32
Middle Class and Vocational EducationAttends Vocational Education by Economic Classes (%)
Bell Shaped curve in the Youth
Source: microdata from Pnad/IBGE
Performing a horse race (stepwise procedure) between mean income, squared income, and Economic Class to explain demand for insurance (health) the latter wins but all are significant
Highly non linear income impact
12/05/2017
17
Simulador de Renda
http://www.fgv.br/ibrecps/cpc/SIM_PNAD_0208_RENDATOT/renda.htm
Assets and Permanent Income based Economic Classes
www.fgv.br/cps
Was it Sustainable?
• The index of consumption potencial increased 22.6% between 2003 and 2009 while the index of income generationrose 31.2%. That is a 38% difference in favor of the producer index.
Consumers and Producers
www.fgv.br/cps
12/05/2017
18
Channels of Impact of Policies for the New Middle Class
MIDDLE CLASS
INVESTMENT ON PEOPLE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS AND SERVICES
INTERNALINFRASTRUCTURE
Own House
EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
CASH TRANSFERS
CURRENT NET INCOME
TAXESTRANSPARENCY
SAVINGS, CREDIT AND INSURANCEMICROFINANCE
CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FINANCIAL
EDUCATION
INCOME GENERATION
ProductivityPRODUCTION
FUNCTION
EXTERNALINFRASTRUCTURE
COMMUNICATIONICTs TRANSPORTATION
SEWAGE
HEALTH AND SECURITY
LEVERAGE OPPORTUNITIES AND
DAMPEN SHOCKSDECENT MARKETSTEMPORAL CHOICE
DIRECT EFFECT
UTILITY orWELLBEING
DIRECTEFFECT
CURRENTBUDGET
CONSTRAINT
QUALITY OF EDUCATIONEVALUATION
AND FUNDING
QUALITY OF JOBSROTATION AND INCENTIVES
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTSIMPLES, CREDIT AND INNOVATION
QUALITY OF WORKERTRAINING AND CERTIFICATION
Additional References fromwww.fgv.br/fgvsocial
Thanks!
12/05/2017
19
Source: SAE designed questions in SECOM – Quarterly Public Perception Poll – July/2014
Acquisition of Goods and Services
*only takes into account the ones who didn´t adquired the good or service in the last 3 years
36,89%
13,39%
4,70%
25,15%
14,49% 15,60%12,59%
6,40%9,08%
50,94% 51,01%
43,35%
61,23%
49,94%
43,40% 44,43%
30,68%
39,97%
21,61%
53,55%
41,63% 42,10%
18,83%
24,85%
44,52%
25,67%
40,19%
52,48%
46,26%
59,23%
35,96%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Why you didn´t acquired this good or service in the last 3 years (%)?
Já possui Não teve dinheiro Não teve vontade/Não foi necessário/Não teve interesse