Date post: | 15-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Science |
Upload: | david-scaduto |
View: | 127 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1 6 3 1 P r i n c e S t r e e t , A l e x a n d r i a , V A 2 2 3 1 4 | 5 7 1 - 2 9 8 - 1 3 0 0 | w w w . a a p m . o r g
MEASURING SPATIAL RESOLUTION IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS
Update of AAPM Task Group 245DA Scaduto
Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY M Goodsitt
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIH-P Chan
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIH Olafsdottir
Image Owl, 105 Reykjavik, IcelandM Das
University of Houston, Houston, TXE Fredenberg
Philips Healthcare, Solna, SwedenW Geiser
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TXD Goodenough
George Washington University, Washington, DCP Heid
ARCADES, Marseille, France
Y-H Hu
Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY B Liu
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MAJ Mainprize
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, North York, ONI Reiser
The University of Chicago, Chicago, ILR Van Engen
LRCB, Nijmegen, NetherlandsV Varchena
CIRS Inc., Norfolk, VAS Vecchio
I.M.S., Pontecchio Marconi (BO), ItalyS Glick
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MDW Zhao
Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY
Detector plane resolution (X/Y-resolution)• Inherent/binned detector resolution• Oblique entry of x-rays• Focal spot size/motion
Depth-direction resolution (Z-resolution)• Limited angular range (9-50°)• Reconstruction algorithms
Aim: Evaluate different spatial resolution measurement techniques
FACTORS AFFECTING SPATIAL RESOLUTION IN TOMOSYNTHESIS
PhantomLab TomoPhan CIRS DBT QC Phantom
QC PHANTOMS
Click to Add Presenter Name
1 6 3 1 P r i n c e S t r e e t , A l e x a n d r i a , V A 2 2 3 1 4 | 5 7 1 - 2 9 8 - 1 3 0 0 | w w w . a a p m . o r g
SPATIAL RESOLUTION: DETECTOR PLANE
EDGE-SPREAD FUNCTION (ESF)
TomoPhan CIRS Phantom
0 2 4 6 8500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000Tube Travel Direction
0 2 4 6 8
1000
1500
2000
Tube Travel Direction
0 2 4 6 8
1400
1500
1600
Cross-scan Direction
0 2 4 6 81000
1100
1200
1300Cross-scan Direction
POINT-SPREAD AND MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTIONS
PSF DEPENDENCE ON OBJECT SIZE
-20 -10 0 10 20-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
PS
F
Distance along profile (mm)
180 µm bead 800 µm bead
-20 -10 0 10 20-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 180 µm bead 50 µm wire
PS
FDistance along profile (mm)
H. Fujita et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 11(1), 34–9 (1992)
Click to Add Presenter Name
1 6 3 1 P r i n c e S t r e e t , A l e x a n d r i a , V A 2 2 3 1 4 | 5 7 1 - 2 9 8 - 1 3 0 0 | w w w . a a p m . o r g
SPATIAL RESOLUTION: DEPTH-DIRECTION
ARTIFACT-SPREAD FUNCTION (ASF)
-10 -5 0 5 10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2 180 µm bead 800 µm bead
Arti
fact
Spr
ead
Func
tion
Distance from In-Focus Plane (mm)0 0
( ) ( )ASF( )
( ) ( )bead bg
bead bg
I z I zz
I z I z
z0zz0
ASF DEPENDENCE ON ANGULAR RANGE
Angular Range
Projection Views
Increment FWHM
16° 17 1° 5.31 mm
24° 9 3° 3.92 mm
32° 17 2° 3.12 mm
48° 25 2° 2.89 mm
60° 21 3° 1.94 mm
-20 -10 0 10 20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
AS
F
Distance from in-focus plane [mm]
16° (FWHM = 5.31 mm) 24° (FWHM = 3.92 mm) 32° (FWHM = 3.12 mm) 48° (FWHM = 2.89 mm) 60° (FWHM = 1.94 mm)
Ramp set Estimated slice width [mm]Upper 1.48Lower 1.56
Average 1.52
SLICE SENSITIVITY PROFILE (SSP)
OVERSAMPLED LSF: TUNGSTEN WIRE
arctan zy
p
q
Y.-H. Hu, B. Zhao, and W. Zhao, Med. Phys. 35(5), 5242 (2008)
Δz
Δy tanq p
PRESAMPLING MTF
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.00
200
400
600
800
1000
LSF(
z)
z [mm]
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
200
400
600
800
1000
LSF(
y)
y [mm]
2D PSF
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Distance in x [mm]
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Dis
tanc
e in
z [m
m]
0 5.88-5.88
-0.5
0.5
0 1 2 3 4 50.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
MTF
(z)
Spatial Frequency [cycles/mm]
OBJECT PSF
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0 ASF Object PSF
AS
F
Distance from in-focus plane (mm)
1ASF ~ PSF MTFobj obj objf S f F
0 1 2 3 4 50.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
MTF
(z)
Spatial Frequency [cycles/mm]
Detector plane spatial resolution• PSF is object-independent with sufficiently small object• MTF (wire, edge) is object-independent
Depth-direction resolution • Indirect/surrogate measurement: SSP, ASF
• Object-dependent• Valid for nonlinear reconstructions
• Direct measurement: MTF• Object-independent• Inherent image performance of system• Invalid for nonlinear reconstructions
CONCLUSIONS
Click to Add Presenter Name
1 6 3 1 P r i n c e S t r e e t , A l e x a n d r i a , V A 2 2 3 1 4 | 5 7 1 - 2 9 8 - 1 3 0 0 | w w w . a a p m . o r g
THANK YOU
TG 245 MembersAAPM