14
Mechanical Engineering Technology Student Learning ' ' Outcomes February, 2017
Mechanical Engineering
Technology
Student Learning ' '
Outcomes
February, 2017
(' (\ )
FDTC Curriculum Map
- Program General Education
Program: Mechanical Engineering Technology/ Mechanical Program of Study Learning Outcomes
Outcomes Hours
Course# Course Title Credits Lecture Lab
MAT110 College Algebra 3 3 0 1,6
ENG 260 Advanced Technical Communications - 3 3 0 2,3,4
ENG 101 English Composition I 3 3 0 3,4
ECO 201 Economic Concepts 3 3 0 4,5
PHY 201 Physics I 4 3 3 5,6
EGR 120 Engineering Computer Applications 3 3 0 6
Elective Humanities/Fine Arts 3 3 0 4,6
-
MET 213 Dynamics 3 3 0 1,2,3
MET 216 Mechanics of Fluid Systems 3 2 3 1,5
MET224 Hydraulics & Pneumatics 3 2 3 1,2,5
MET 226 Applied Heat Principles 4 3 3 1,3,4
MET 231 Machine Design - 4 3 3 1,2,3,5
MET240 Mechanical Senior Project 1 0 3 1,2,3
EEM 251 Programmable Logic Controllers 3 2 3 2,3,4,5
EET103 Introduction to Electronics 3 2 3 4,5
EGR 170 Engineering materials 3 2 3 1,2,3
EGR 194 Statics & Strength of Materials 4 3 3 1,2,3
EGT 252 Advanced CAD 3 2 3 2,3
( ~ )
Program Outcomes -
1 MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to characterize fundamental mechanical systems.
2 MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to model a basic mechanical system and characterize pertinent mechanical parameters.
MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to utilize 2D & 3D Models and simulation software to characterize mechanical systems and to convey both 3 design concepts and detail.
4 MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to interface with basic automation and robotic systems.
5 MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to characterize fundamental electrical circuits.
6 MET-Mechanical graduates will be competent in safe workplace practices and utilize personal protective equipment.
General Education Outcomes
1. Quantitative Literacy
2. Oral Communication
3. Written Communication
4. Reading Comprehension
5. Information Literacy
6. Critical Thinking
7. Applied Technology
( (\ )
Mechanical Engineering Technology
Course Student Learning Outcomes 5-Year Assessment
Map
I MET 213 Dynamics Fall 2019
1 Identify pertinent variables associated with linear kinematics. 1,2,3 2 Characterize lD and 2D linear motion scenarios involving constant acceleration. 1,2,3 3 Identify pertinent variables associated with rotational kinematics. 1,2,3 4 Characterize rotational kinematics scenarios involving constant angular acceleration. 1,2,3
MET 216 Mechanics of Fluid Systems Fall 2016
1 Calculate the viscosity of fluids. 1,5
2 Determine the hydrostatic pressures in fluids at different depths. 1,5
3 Apply the continuity equation. 1,5 4 Apply the Bernoulli's Equation. 1,5
5 Apply the Energy Equation and determine the different losses in a hydraulic system. 1,5
MET224 Hydraulics & Pneumatics Spring 2018
1 Characterize Force-Pressure-Area relationships in hydraulic & pneumatics circuits. 1,2,5 2 Determine flow parameters for hydraulic & pneumatic circuits. 1,2,5 3 Document hydraulic and pneumatics circuits utilizing 2D software. 1,2,5 4 Apply pressure limitation and flow controls to practical hydraulic & pneumatic circuits. 1,2,5 5 Apply directional control principles to practical hydraulic & pneumatic circuits. 1,2,5 6 Troubleshoot hydraulic and pneumatic circuits. 1,2,5
MET226 Applied Heat Principles. Spring 2019
1 Identify heat transfer modes for a given scenario. 1,3,4 2 Determine heat transfer given practical parameters. 1,3,4 3 Apply the ideal gas law to practical scenarios. 1,3,4 4 Apply the 1st Law of Thermodynamics to practical scenarios. 1,3,4
( ~ ) MET 231 Machine Design Spring 2019
1 Characterize simple machines and related parameters. 1,2,3,5 2 Determine mechanical advantage for specifed mechanical systems. 1,2,3,5 3 Model machine components utilizing 2D & 3D software. 1,2,3,5 4 Apply industrial robots to material handling scenarios. 1,2,3,5 5 Apply industrial robots to material handling scenarios. 1,2,3,5
MET240 Mechanical Senior Project Spring 2020
1 Utilize 2D & 3D software to design a mechanical prototype. 1,2,3 2 Document pertinent production parameters. 1,2,3 3 Produce a working prototype. 1,2,3 4 Evaluate prototype performance. 1,2,3
EEM 251 Programmable Logic Controllers
1 Describe basic PLC concepts . 2,3,4,5 Spring 2018
2 Develop basic ladder programs. 2,3,4,5
3 Convert basic relay logic circuits to ladder logic programs. 2,3,4,5 4 Debug and modify complex programs. 2,3,4,5
5 Describe the logical operation of Timers and Counters. 2,3,4,5
EET103 Introduction to Electronics Summer 2018
1 Use engineering notation and metric prefixes to represent large and small quantities. 4,5
2 Describe a basic electric circuit and make basic circuit measurements. 4,5
3 Recognize electrical hazards and practice proper safety procedures. 4,5
4 Describe the operation of diode limiters and diode clamping circuits. 4,5
5 Interpret diode and Transistor data sheet. 4,5
EGR 170 Engineering Materials Fall 2017
1 Characterize common engineering materials and their applications. 1,2,3
2 Characterize steel production steps and their importance to the manufacturing process. 1,2,3
3 Characterize composite materials and their application to structural designs. 1,2,3 4 Characterize natural composites and pertinent applications. 1,2,3
( ' r------ ) \
EGR 194 Statics & Strength of Materials Summer 2017
1 Determine reactions for applied force scenarios. 1,2,3
2 Determine internal member forces for structural scenarios. 1,2,3 3 Determine area centroids for specified structural areas. 1,2,3
4 Qualify stresses associated with applied forces acting on a specified structure. 1,2,3 5 Quantify bending stress and deflections for structural members. 1,2,3
I EGT 252 Advanced CAD Fall 2016
1 Utilize 3D CAD software to create mechanical parts. 2,3
2 Utilize 3D CAD software to create 3D mechanical assemblies. 2,3
3 Apply proper relationships to define engineering part and assembly files. 2,3
4 Identify errors of in a 3D CAD file. 2,3
5 Create 2D drawings to facilitate creation of parts and assemblies. 2,3
FDTC Mechanical Engineering Technology Degree, MET 216 Student Identification Program Outcome #2
Name MET-Mechanical graduates will be ab~e to model a basic mechanical system 1/) and characterize pertinent mechanical parameters -C (l)
"C -- CSLO 2. Students will determine the ::I - CSLO 4. Students will apply Bernoulli's u, hydrostatic pressures in fluids at .... Equation 0 different depths -C
::I 0 Last First Sex IDNO Summative Formative Summative Formative (.)
In-Class [Lab Test 1 Quiz 2 1] Test 4 Quiz4 Lab 4
1 xxxx xxxx xxxx 99 80 100 98 80 100 2 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100 80 100 99 80 100 3 xxxx xxxx xxxx 98 80 100 90 80 100 4 xxxx xxxx xxxx 97 80 100 100 80 100 5 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100 80 100 98 80 100 6 xxxx xxxx xxxx 95 80 100 83 80 100 7 xxxx xxxx xxxx 100 80 100 91 80 100
~~dlW-~ I ~ ~ I 70 70 70 70 70 70
,II I , ...... "< m , .,,1 ... '1,111 , ·I 70 70 70 70 70 70 Actual Percentage 100 100 100 100 100 100
Benchmark Achieved? Exceed Exceed Exceed Exceed Exceed Exceed
I I J!l C QI
'C ::s ii5 ... 0 .. C ::s 0 Last u
1 xxxx 2 xxxx 3 xxxx 4 xxxx s xxxx 6 xxxx 7 xxxx 8 xxxx 9 xxxx
10 xxxx 11 xxxx 12 xxxx 13 xxxx 14 xxxx 15 xxxx 16 xxxx
Student Identification Name
First Sex ID NO
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
FDTC Mechanical Engineering Technology Degree, EGT 252 Program Outcome #3
MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to utilize 2D & 3D Models and simulation software to characterize mechanical systems and to convey both design concepts and detail
CSLO 1. Students will utilize 3D CAD software to create mechanical parts
Summative Formative forming plate Groove Block
100 80 100 100 100 40 100 80 70 100 100 60 100 100 100 80 70 20 so 100 80 100
100 100 100 80 100 80 100 100 80 100
CSLO 2. Students will utilize 3D CAD software to create 3D mechanical assemblies
Summative Formative
project pro 5.139 5.142 100 100 70 100 90 80 0 90 0
100 90 100 100 100 100 100 0 0 72 100 100 100 100 80 72 40 0 100 100 90 100 80 80 70 90 100 70 80 100 100 100 100 100 100 80 100 100 90
*70% of the students will score 70% or higher Benchmark%*
Minimum Student Score* Actual Percentage
Benchmark Achieved?
I 10 I 10 70 70
93.75 81.25 Exceed Exceed
70 70 70 70 70 70
93.75 87.S 81.25 Exceed Exceed Exceed
( r------.
Florence-Darlington Technical College Mechanical Engineering Technology -
Program Assessment-Systematic Evaluation Plan
Course Category: IZI Traditional D Hybrid/Blended D Online D Web Facilitated D Dual Enrollment D DL
Program Student Learning Outcome:
#1 MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to characterize fundamental mechanical systems.
Course Course Student Learning
Number Outcome
MET 216 CSLO #2 Students will determine the hydrostatic
pressures in fluids at
different depths.
MET 216 CSLO #2 Students will determine the hydrostatic
pressures in fluids at
different depths.
MET216 CSLO #4 Students will apply
Bernoulli's Equation.
MET216 CSLO #4 Students will apply
Bernoulli's Equation.
SEP(Data Collection V2) 9-2016
Assessment
Method
Formative: Class will complete assigned hydrostatic
pressure laboratory exercise and quiz. Summative: Midterm evaluation on Hydrostatic Pressure.
Formative: Class
will complete the assigned laboratory
exercise and quiz on
Bernoulli's Equation. Summative: Assessment is a test
on Bernoulli's Equation.
Benchmark Actual Level of
Achievement
70% of students Exceeded benchmark
will score 70% with 100% of the
or better on the students scoring
assessments. 100% on lab and 80%
on quiz assignments.
70% of the Exceeded benchmark
students will with 100% of the
achieve a grade students scoring at
of 70 or better least 25 points or
on the greater on test 1.
assessment.
70% of the Exceeded benchmark
students will with 100% of the
achieve a grade students scoring
of 70 or better 100% on the
on the Bernoulli lab exercise
assessment. and 80% on quiz.
70% of students Exceeded benchmark
will achieve with 100% of the
70% or better students scoring at
on the least 13 points or
assessment. higher on test 4.
Action Plan
Benchmark exceeded -Instructor will provide
tutoring on collecting
documentation and data organization .
Benchmark exceeded-
However, the instructor will
provide tutoring to students
on examples to show
calculations
Benchmark exceeded-
However, the instructor will
review the energy equation
and application prior to
testing.
Benchmark exceeded -
Instructor will tutor
students with examples using Bernoulli's equation.
)
Time Interval
2017FA Week3
2017FA Weeks
2017FA Week 10
2017FA Week 12
( /'-
Florence-Darlingfou Technical College Mechanical Engineering Technology -
Program Assessment-Systematic Evaluation Plan
Course Category: D Traditional D Hybrid/Blended D Online ~ Web Facilitated D Dual Enrollment D DL Program Student learning Outcome:
J
[3] MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to utilize 2D & 3D Models and simulation software to characterize mechanical systems and to convey both design concepts and detail.
Course Course Student Learning
Number Outcome EGT 252 CSLO #1 Students will utilize
3D CAD software to create mechanical parts [groove/ gismo]
EGT252 CSLO #1 Students will utilize 3D CAD software to create mechanical parts [forming plate]
EGT252 CSLO #2 Students will utilize 3D CAD software to create 3D mechanical assemblies [5.139/5.142]
EGT 252 CSLO #2 Students will utilize 3D CAD software to create 3D mechanical assemblies [Project pro]
SEP(Data Collection V2) 9-2016
Assessment Benchmark
Method Formative: Class will 70% of complete assigned students will drawing exercise score 70% or (groove/gismo block) better on accurately and with assessment minimal sketch definition errors. Summative: midterm 70% of the evaluation: utilize students will part modification achieve a tools to create grade of 70 or complex geometry better on {lofted cut, cut-revolve, assessment patterning tools).
-Formative: students 70% of the are provided students will documentation for achieve a assembly/merged grade of 70 or part file. better
Summative~ Class 70%of will create necessary students will parts for an assembly achieve 70% and assemble same or better as specified.
Actual Level of Action Plan Time Interval Achievement
Exceeded benchmark Benchmark exceeded - The 2016FA week with 82% scored better instructor will outline sketch 2 than 70% on the groove definition techniques will all block. Three student students. scored below the benchmark by 10, 20 and 50 points. Exceeded benchmark Benchmark exceeded -The 2016FA week with 93.75% scoring instructor will outline sketch 7 better than 70%. One definition techniques and student did score 20 review transition to 3D from points below the 2D CAD; review visual cues benchmark. for software users.
On both formative Benchmark met - Instructor will 2016FA week assessment the encourage students to take the 6 benchmark was met. assessment when assigned. However, on both if students had taken the assessment, scores would have been more acceptable. Exceeded the Benchmark met - Instructor will 2016FA week benchmark with 93.75% review 3D relationships; 15 of the students scoring provide extra tutoring to help better than 70%. One students gain experience & student did not encourage students to complete complete the project the project when assigned.
(
L
Florence-Darlington Technical College
Assessment-Systematic Evaluation Plan Detailed Report
Course Name: MET 216
Faculty: Kami! Zakhour
Semester(s) Reported: 2016FA
Technical Education Division
Course Category: 181 Traditional D Hybrid/Blended D Online D Web Facilitated D Dual
Enrollment D DL
Program Student Learning Outcome: #1) MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to characterize
fundamental mechanical systems.
Course Student Learning Outcome: #2) Students will determine the hydrostatic pressures in fluids at
different depths.
Analysis of Results: Formative: Exceeded benchmark with 100% of the students scoring 100% on lab
and 80% on quiz assignments. Summative: Exceeded benchmark with I 00% of the students scoring at
least 25 points or greater on test I .
Strength in student performances: Overall, students demonstrated mastery of measurement techniques
and data analysis
Weaknesses in student performances: Students can improve in supporting documentation and data
organization.
Recommended Action(s): The instructor will provide tutoring to students on collecting documentation,
data organization and calculations through examples.
When Action will be implemented: 20 l 7F A
D C ata omoar1son: 2016 20 20 - -Sprin2- Startup
Measurement Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark
Instrument Formative: Class 70% of the will complete students will score assigned 70% or better on hydrostatic lab assignment. pressure.
Summative: 70% of the Midterm students will score evaluation: 70% or better on Hydrostatic the examination. Pressure Test.
Impact of Changes Implemented As a Result of Previous Assessment Cycle:
SEP(Summary)V2
9-2016
20 -
Benchmark
(
L
Florence-Darlington Technical College Assessment-Systematic Evaluation Plan Detailed Report
Course Name: MET 216
Faculty: Kami) Zakhour
Semester(s) Reported: 2016FA
Technical Education Division
Course Category: 181 Traditional D Hybrid/Blended D Online D Web Facilitated D Dual
Enrollment D DL
Program Student Learning Outcome: #1) MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to characterize
fundamental mechanical systems.
Course Student Learning Outcome: #4) Students will apply Bernoulli's Equation.
Analysis of Results: Formative: Exceeded benchmark with 100% of the students scoring 100% on the
Bernoulli lab exercise and 80% on quiz. Summative: Exceeded benchmark with 100% of the students
s~oring at least 13 points or higher on test 4.
Strength in student performances: Generally, students mastered Bernoulli's Equation and its
application to physical systems.
Weaknesses in student performances: In the formative stage, some students needed help with the
concept of energy losses but with tutoring students achieved better grades on the summative assessment.
Recommended Action(s): Instructor will tutor students with examples using Bernoulli's equation.
When Action will be implemented: 20 l 7F A
D t C aa omnanson: 2016 20 20 - -Spring- Startup
Measurement Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark Instrument Formative: Class 70% of the will complete students will score
assigned 70% or better on Bernoulli's lab assignment. laboratory exercise.
Summative: 70% of the midterm students will score evaluation: 70% or better on Bernoulli's examination. Equation Test
Impact of Changes Implemented As a Result of Previous Assessment Cycle:
SEP(Summary)V2
9-2016
20 -
Benchmark
(
L
Florence-Darlington Technical College Assessment-Systematic Evaluation Plan Detailed Report
Course Name: EGT 252
Faculty: David C. Edwards
Semester(s) Reported: 2016FA
Technical Education Division
Course Category: D Traditional D Hybrid/Blended D Online ~ Web Facilitated D Dual
Enrollment D DL
Program Student Learning Outcome: #3) MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to utilize 2D & 3D Models and simulation software to characterize mechanical systems and to convey both design concepts and detail.
Course Student Learning Outcome: #1) Students will utilize 3D CAD software to create mechanical parts.
Analysis of Results: Formative: On both formative assessment the benchmark was met (87 .5 and 81.25). However, on both if students had taken the assessment, scores would have been more acceptable. Summative: Exceeded the benchmark with 93.75% of the students scoring better than 70%. One student did not complete the project.
Strength in student performances: Students generally grasped sketch definition and design intent concepts.
Weaknesses in student performances: Students are not understanding the coordinate reference system.
Recommended Action(s): The instructor will outline sketch definition techniques and review transition to 3D from 2D CAD; review visual cues for software users.
When Action will be implemented: 2017SP
D t C aa ompanson: 2016 20 20 - -Sprin2- Startup
Measurement Instrument Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark
Formative: Class will 70% or students complete assigned drawing will score 70%or exercise with no more than better on the one sketch definition error. assessments. Summative: Midterm 70% or students evaluation: utilize part will score 70%or modification tools to create better on the complex geometry. assessments.
Impact of Changes Implemented As a Result of Previous Assessment Cycle:
SEP(Summary)V2 9-2016
20 -
Benchmark
(
L
Florence-Darlington Technical College Assessment-Systematic Evaluation Plan Detailed Report
Course Name: EGT 252
Faculty: David C. Edwards
Semester(s) Reported: 2016FA
Technical Education Division
Course Category: D Traditional D Hybrid/Blended D Online 181 Web Facilitated D Dual
Enrollment D DL
Program Student Learning Outcome: #3) MET-Mechanical graduates will be able to utilize 2D & 3D
Models and simulation software to characterize mechanical systems and to convey both design concepts
and detail.
Course Student Learning Outcome: #2) Students will utilize 3D CAD software to create 3D
mechanical assemblies.
Analysis of Results: On both formative assessment the benchmark was met. However, on both if
students had taken the assessment scores would have been more acceptable. Summative: Exceeded the
benchmark with 93.75% of the students scoring better than 70%. One student did not complete the
project.
Strength in student performances: Students generally grasped basic positioning concepts.
Weaknesses in student performances: Students need to further develop spatial relationship
comprehension of advanced geometry.
Recommended Action{s): Instructor will review 3D relationships; provide extra tutoring to help students
gain experience & encourage students to complete the project when assigned.
When Action will be implemented: 20 l 7SP
D t C aa omoanson: 2016 20 20 - -Sprine- Startup
Measurement Benchmark Benchmark Benchmark
Instrument Formative: Students are 70% of students will
provided documentation score 70% or better on
for assembly/merged part the assessments.
file. Summative: Class will 70% of students will
create necessary parts for score 70% or better on
an assembly and the assessments.
assemble same as specified.
Impact of Changes Implemented As a Result of Previous Assessment Cycle:
SEP(Summary}V2 9-2016
20 -
Benchmark
