media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but...

13131313131313

METRO ACTIVE TRANSPORT (MAT) PROGRAM CYCLE 1 SOLICITATION

1

GENERAL PROVISIONS Introduction The Metro Active Transport Transit and FirstLast Mile (MAT) is a multi-year discretionary program within Measure M This Cycle 1 Program establishes goals process and criteria for the five-year cycle of the MAT Program for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 The MAT Program Administrative Procedures were developed in consultation with the Policy Advisory Council (PAC) Active Transportation Working Group The Working Group includes representatives from government agencies and active transportation stakeholder organizations with expertise in pedestrian and bicycle issues Program Purpose and Goals The overarching purpose of the MAT Program is to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation such as biking and walking and enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety Specific Cycle 1 goals include

x Advancing key Metro policies with a focus on the Active Transportation Strategic Plan (ATSP) FirstLast Mile (FLM) policy and the Equity Platform Framework

x Initiating implementation of ATSP-identified firstlast mile projects and active transportation corridors

x Jump-starting action and building momentum for future efforts creating visible tangible results and setting the ground work for implementation at the broad scale envisioned by ATSP

x Encouraging testing and refining project partnerships and innovative delivery approaches and

x Targeting investments in high need areas Program Schedule The schedule below lists the major milestones for the development and adoption of the Cycle 1 program

Milestone Date 1 Policy Advisory Council Meeting

Present and seek concurrence on Administrative Procedures Screening amp Prioritization Methodologies amp Cycle 1 Solicitation

June 11 2019

2 Notice of Cycle InitiationCirculate Schedule to Eligible Recipients

August 26 2019

3 Workshop with Potential ApplicantProposers

September 10 2019

4 CEO Approval of Administrative Procedures September 10 2019

5

Metro Board Meeting Metro staff present Administrative Procedures and Screening amp Prioritization Methodologies and seeks approval for Cycle 1 Solicitation

January 23 2020

Milestone Date

6 MAT Program Project Solicitation February 18 2020 7 Questions on Project Solicitation Due March 3 2020 8 MAT Program Letters of Interest Due April 2 2020

April 16 2020 April 30 2020

9 MAT Program Project Selection Late May 2020 10 Metro Board Meeting

Metro staff seek approval of programming recommendations and authorization to execute agreements with grantees

Anticipated July 2020

11 MAT Program AgreementsProject Initiation Metro staff work with grantees to execute agreements and initiate projects

Fall 2020

Programming Cycle The MAT Program is a multi-year discretionary program with a projected total of $857 million available through 2057 The first cycle of the MAT Program will commit and program funds for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 (Cycle 1) according to the process described in the MAT Program Administrative Procedures and further delineated in this Cycle 1 program The Measure M Ordinance Guidelines and Administrative Procedures as well as the specific MAT Program Administrative Procedures apply to this program establishing definitions eligible activities and process The programming capacity for the MAT Program for this time period is approximately $15 million per year or $75 million over the full five-year period

Programmatic Categories As detailed in the ATSP and established in the MAT Program Administrative Procedures the MAT Program will feature two major categories of activity

x Development of a FirstLast Mile priority network around major transit stations and x Development of active transportation corridors supporting travel by active modes

countywide Cycle 1 will include a funding target of 50 of available funds for each programmatic category More specifically the FirstLast Mile programmatic category will commit approximately $375 million to a program of projects at the time of this solicitation The active transportation corridor programmatic category will commit approximately $375 million to a program of projects at the time of this solicitation

Funding at this level will allow each programmatic category to fund a significant subset of projects and project partners from which to test and refine project delivery techniques Throughout the life of the MAT Program the distribution of funds between the programmatic categories may vary

Matching and Leveraging Funds Metro does not require a funding match for Cycle 1 Project support will be required from all jurisdictions for any project in the form of an in-kind match of staff time For FLM and active transportation corridor projects Metro encourages the leveraging of additional funds for a project by considering leveraging in the evaluation criteria (see page 8 and 13 ndash ldquoSelection Criteriardquo)

2

3

Funding Restrictions MAT funds shall not supplant other committed funds and are not available to fund cost increases Projects that are already fully funded or projects that are a capital improvement required as a condition for private development approval or permits are not eligible for MAT Program funding Ownership Maintenance and Liability Project proposerlocal jurisdiction agrees to own maintain and retain liability over all improvements delivered through the program unless improvements are located on Metro property and Metro maintenance role is specifically agreed to Measure M Recognition Requirement Projects and services funded by Measure M will publicly acknowledge the use of Measure M funds through websites flyers or other promotional and marketing materials The form of recognition will be left to the discretion of Metro in consultation with the project sponsor Complete Streets Requirement Project sponsors awarded funding through Cycle 1 must have an adopted Complete Streets Policy an adopted CityCounty Resolution supporting Complete Streets or an adopted General Plan consistent with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 at the time they are awarded MAT funding For more information and resources please visit Metros website httpswwwmetronetprojectscountywide-planningmetros-complete-streets-policy-requirements ELIGIBILITY Eligible Recipients Cities County of Los Angeles Caltrans and transit agencies are eligible to receive funding through this program Other transportation-related public joint powers authorities (JPAs) must be sponsored by one of the aforementioned public agencies Funding of Metro Activities As described further below Cycle 1 of the MAT Program may include significant Metro staff and contractor efforts in partnership with project sponsors and other entities Metro-led activities may vary by project as well as by phase within individual projects Metros efforts associated with MAT-funded projects will be funded through MAT Program funds unless otherwise determined at Metros sole discretion The program of projects developed for Board approval will specify funding that is allocated to Metro staff time associated with the project as well as Metro consultantcontractor time associated with the project Similarly project funds to be granted to recipients for both staff and consultantcontractor costs will be specified in the program of projects Project Eligibility Projects must be consistent with Metros FirstLast Mile Strategic Plan (2014) or Active Transportation Strategic Plan (2016) FirstLast Mile locations eligible for Cycle 1 funding are listed in Attachment A These locations were identified using screening and prioritization criteria that took into account equity safety and mobilityconnectivity factors Attachment A describes the methodology in full In brief the

4

FirstLast Mile Priority Network defined in this program stems from Metro Board Motion 141 (May 2016) This motion directed firstlast mile planning activities for the existing transit network including Metro Rail Busway and Metrolink stations as well as the top 100 ridership bus stops in the county These categories collectively yield 269 station areas which form the universe of eligible project locations for Cycle 1 Consistent with ATSP methodology a station area is defined by a 300-foot buffer around the closest major intersection to the actual station or stop and is inclusive of adjacent (eg bus-to-rail transfer) stops Metro will consider any applications that contemplate improvements for adjacent stations as described further below under Eligible Project LocationsInvitation to Submit (FirstLast Mile Program)

Active transportation corridor projects eligible for Cycle 1 funding are listed in Attachment A These projects were identified using screening and prioritization criteria by considering equity safety and mobilityconnectivity factors Attachment A describes the methodology in full In brief the ATSP identified 186 corridor projects Corridors were screened for those that were longer than three miles The resulting list contained 120 multi-jurisdictions and 40 single-jurisdictions creating a total of 160 corridor projects These projects were then prioritized using the above factors Eligible Project Expenditures and Limitations MAT funds are eligible for capital projects on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail Projects shall not require the acquisition of significant rights-of-way (not more than 10 of the MAT-funded construction cost) Similarly projects shall not use more than 10 of the MAT-funded project construction cost on utility relocation or landscaping elements Examples of eligible project elements are listed in the table that follows The list is not intended to be exhaustive FLM projects must be constructed within a half-mile radius of the transitrail station For Cycle 1 Metro encourages FLM project improvements to be directed to a substantially smaller radius of one to two blocks in order to test partnership and project delivery models and to readily deploy visible improvements that can be scaled up through future efforts Improvements up to frac12 mile from stations are eligible and can be funded provided they both demonstrate high value in improving connectivity andor safety and that the submittal clearly describes project deliverability based on demonstrated support andor prior effort to plan and scope proposed improvements Project elements or costs considered ineligible for MAT funding include but are not limited to non-infrastructure elements such as education operational costs and maintenance The aforementioned list is not intended to be exhaustive Projects selected through the MAT Program may be funded for work preceding the environmental phase but such expenditures are limited to 05 of overall program funding within each cycle As Measure M active transportation funds are capital only MAT-funded projects will lead to the construction of bike andor pedestrian improvements

Table 1 Examples of Eligible Project Elements

Bicycle Elements Pedestrian Elements

Bicycle detection loops Sidewalks Rumble strips with consideration for bicyclists Crosswalks Bicycle-friendly drainage grates High Visibility Crosswalks

5

Bicycle rails on bridges ADA Compliant Curb Ramps Bicycle-friendly track crossings Pedestrian-activated control devices (PCS

APS) Bike boxes Crossing islands Bike parking Curb bulb-outsextensions Class I II III IV bike paths Leading pedestrian interval Green colored pavement for bikeways Accommodating pedestrians at interchanges Bike signalsbicycle signal priority Pedestrian wayfindingsignage Roundabouts Bridge access for pedestrians Accommodating bicyclists at interchanges Overpassunderpass for pedestrians Bicycle signage Street furnitureseating Bridge access for bicyclists Pedestrian scale lighting Overpassunderpass for bicyclists Landscaped areas (including trees)

Transit Related Elements Traffic Calming Elements Bus pull out or bulb Speed humps Transit stop improvements Speed cushions Transit shelters Speed tables Boarding islands Raised crosswalks Transit signage Median islands Transit traveler information Traffic circles

Transit Related Elements eligible only in FLM program category PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORIES ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS Program Objectives Objectives specific to active transportation corridors include

x Supporting the expansion of the active transportation network through the partnerships with jurisdictions

x Encouraging new or strengthened partnerships across jurisdictional boundaries x Advancing projects that can effectively compete for additional funding for future phases

of work and x Supporting project that are ready and demonstrate immediate outcomes and benefits

Selection Process Invitation to Submit Projects will be selected for funding based on 1) the quantitative initial screening and prioritization process and 2) the qualitative evaluation of submitted Letters of Interest (LOI) The ATSP (2016) identified approximately 186 corridor projects Of these 120 were longer than three miles and traversed more than one jurisdiction Additionally 40 corridors were single-jurisdiction projects with a minimum of three miles A total of 160 active transportation corridor projects are eligible for Cycle 1 of the MAT Program These projects have been prioritized using equity safety and mobilityconnectivity criteria Attachment A describes the methodology in full Project sponsors associated with the highest-ranking projects up to the level of MAT funding

6

available for active transportation corridor projects ($375 million in Cycle 1) will be invited to submit a Letter of Interest (LOI) (Attachment B) Metro staff will reach out to all jurisdictions along the length of a proposed active transportation corridor to evaluate interest in proceeding with a prioritized corridor Projects that propose two or more jurisdictions and are wholly within the frac12 mile boundary of a prioritized corridor will maintain their existing scoring in Attachment A If a modified version of the prioritized corridor is proposed the project must meet the following two conditions 1) a portion of the project must be within the frac12 mile boundary of a prioritized corridor and 2) the project must be cumulatively 3 miles in length For a modified version of the prioritized corridor Metro will recalculate the quantitative score based on prioritization criteria Note Metro will provide funding for active transportation corridor projects through the environmental final design andor construction phases Maximum fund limit for each project is $8 million Active transportation corridor projects with funding needs exceeding MAT funding limits are expected to compete for additional funding for future phases of work from a variety of sources Metro intends to offer grant assistance to assist MAT funded projects in seeking State Active Transportation Program (ATP) and other competitive grants pending future Board consideration on Grant Assistance Program criteria Project Proposers Metro will request multi-jurisdiction projects to nominate a lead jurisdiction (Project Proposer) to prepare the LOI for the prioritized corridor project All project sponsors shall have direct authority to implement the improvements proposed in the LOI (eg ownership of the public right-of-way) Upon submitting the LOI all project sponsors shall agree and certify their ability and willingness to carry out the phases of the project supported by MAT funding The project sponsor(s) agrees that any necessary reviews permit processes or other discretionary functions will be streamlined to the greatest extent possible so that key project milestones will be met for each phase of work Project support will be required from all jurisdictions along a corridor in the form of an in-kind match of staff time Each jurisdiction shall identify and commit a specific project liaisoncoordinator who is responsible for working with Metro and other jurisdictions to implement the project This requirement applies to all entities with ROW control for the project including special districts utilities and other non-municipal entities as applicable The LOI must clearly identify these persons and describe their decision-making authority with the expectation that they will be able to make decisions regarding the delivery of the project and confer directly with elected officials and other decision makers as needed

To the extent that program funds are granted to project sponsors funding is made available through a project Funding Agreement carrying specific requirements for adherence to law regulation and policy For active transportation corridor projects Funding Agreements will be executed in advance of the final design and construction phases Where funding is not granted to project sponsors (ie prior to final design and construction) Metro will enter into Cooperative Agreements or Memorandums of Understanding with project sponsors to specify roles and responsibilities for the project

7

Metros Role Metro anticipates offering two models of delivery 1) Metro may lead initial project development through the environmental phase while working in close collaboration with the relevant project sponsors- in particular those staff designated as project liaisonscoordinators Metro anticipates it will lead the project initiation phase including location-specific studies community engagement feasibility reviews and other activities resulting in a refined scope specific improvements to be delivered and budget for the project Metro anticipates it will lead the environmental review including any required environmental studies documentation and public review to comply with applicable laws and regulations Note Any Metro activities associated with a MAT funded project will be fully paid for as part of the MAT Program project award unless otherwise determined at Metros sole discretion 2) Projects sponsors may lead initial project development through construction Through the Funding Agreement Metro will provide oversight and ensure the project is consistent with the project scope schedule budget and meets the MAT program goals and objectives Project Delivery In the case that Metro leads the project through the environmental phase while working in close collaboration with the relevant project sponsors consultant support will be sought to conduct this work This may include up to 30 design drawings Refer to sample flow chart provided in Attachment C Upon completion of the environmental phase the Project Sponsor will take lead of the project through subsequent phases of implementation funded by the MAT Program Cycle Metro will allocate funding to the lead project sponsor for the final design and construction phases according to the established scope and budget for the project in the Funding Agreement For Cycle 1 Metro does not anticipate leading projects during the final design or construction phases Projects for which MAT funds will be allocated will be expected to result in a complete work product or deliverable Table 2 identifies the products expected

Table 2 Expected Work ProductsDeliverables by Phase

Phase Expected Work ProductDeliverable

ScopingPlanning Conceptual Engineering Environmental Review

Alternative analysis environmental documentation conceptual design preliminary cost estimates

Design Engineering (PSampE)

Final design package including contract documents environmental documentation as applicable cost estimates

Construction Constructed improvement

8

Letters of Interest Project sponsors invited to submit an LOI will be required to include the following information in their submission

1 Lead Project Sponsor Contact Information 2 Any Additional Project Sponsors Contact Information 3 Project Description Project name project location and extents project scope including

improvementscomponents and any anticipated project goals objectives outcomes and deliverables

4 Background Information Please reference any local plans the project is included in project history and any community engagement that has already occurred Please note whether any community-based organizations business groups or other associations have demonstrated any support or opposition to the project

5 Project Milestone Schedule Describe steps to ensure adherence with schedule Please note any anticipated reviewapprovalspermit processes and note any anticipated challenges and plans for how they will be addressed More specifically note any anticipated right-of-way acquisition or utility relocation or other known project impediments or complicating factors

6 Description of Proposed Partner Roles and Responsibilities Please identify agencies organizations andor property owners that will be active partners in the project Indicate how and when their involvement is required in order to implement andor maintain the project

7 Funding Please note if leveraging is anticipated and include estimate and budget for implementation ready projects

8 Letters of Support Project Partners Within each letter please outline the types of activities each jurisdiction or stakeholder would undertake to support the project Please also attach any general letters of support from institutional or community interests

Selection Criteria Projects will be selected according to their total score consisting of up to 30 points based on the Metro-established needs-based ranking (refer to Attachment A for project list point allocation and methodology) and up to 70 points through qualitative review based on the evaluation criteria described below

x Project descriptionclear proposal of project scope and components to achieve program outcomes (up to 20 points) Proposal provides a clear description of the project location and includes map of project including existing conditions and proposed improvements Describe existing conditions and explain how the project improves andor addresses equity safety health mobility and connectivity to the active transportation network The LOI AT Corridor section requires more detail for the following

o Boundaries and elements o Consistency with AT prioritized corridor o Connectivity to AT network existing transportation facilities and destinations

x Project SupportPartnerships (up to 20 points) Proposal provides evidence of support from key decision makers and stakeholders Proposal includes committed and innovative partnerships with thoughtful description of intended partner roles and responsibilities Describe if the proposed project is included in or is consistent with an adopted plan as evidence for project support and commitment The LOI AT Corridor section requires more detail on the following

o Multi-jurisdictional coordination and partnerships o Community support

x Process assurances and reasonableness of schedule (up to 15 points) Proposal describes any likelynecessary review approvals and permit processes along with a description of steps and assurances to streamline processes Project describes an overall schedule along with a realistic description of how the schedule can be met and what steps will be taken to mitigate schedule impacts of any unforeseen circumstances

x Funding Strategy (up to 10 points) Provide project funding strategy budget and cost estimates (as applicable) by phase

x Other factors (up to 5 points) Proposers are encouraged to suggest other considerations as to why their projectproject location is particularly compelling or valuable per the program goals and objectives

x Equity Focused Communities (EFCs) (up to 5 bonus points) Project locations that pass through EFCs (as defined in Attachment A) will receive up to 5 bonus points

Selection Process

Each LOI will be evaluated and scored by a panel of at least three (3) experts Metro may include PAC members in evaluation panels provided those individuals certify that they have no stake or interest in any project under consideration A proposed list of selected projects will be presented to the Board according to the program schedule above for approval It is Metrorsquos intention to explore different partnerships and delivery models in different contexts As such ensuring project in multiple jurisdictions across a diverse geography will be an additional consideration in recommending awards

LOI submittals including all required elements are due to Metro before 5 pm on Thursday April 2 2020 April 16 2020 April 30 2020 LOIs shall be submitted electronically to MATProgrammetronet

Prior to entering into any agreement to initiate the project (Cooperative Agreement Funding Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding) project sponsors will be required to provide evidence of demonstrated support of governing bodies (eg resolutions City Manager letters of support funding commitments) with authority for public realm and right-of-way affected by the project agreeing to carry out the project as proposed and further agreeing to terms as established in the program Administrative Procedures and this cycle program A sample resolution is provided in Attachment D

FIRSTLAST MILE PROGRAM

Program Objectives Objectives specific to FirstLast Mile projects include

x Seeding projects at a readily deployable scale to demonstrate results quickly x Focusing efforts on the existing transit network prioritizing equity and safety x Testing specific planning and design concepts including those embedded in Metrorsquos

Transfers Design Guide (others including National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) complete streets and NACTO micro mobility) and leveraging a suite of public and private opportunities to improve access to transit and deliver outstanding trip experiences for all users of a multi-modal transportation system

9

10

x Fostering new partnerships and collaboration opportunities with local jurisdictions JPAs non-profits community-based organizations and the business community in project visioning permit expediting construction and long-term maintenance and

x Building momentum and prompting opportunities for projects to compete for additional funding for future phases of work

Eligible Project LocationsInvitation to Submit Projects will be selected for funding based on a competitive process A total of 269 transit stationstop locations were screened for eligibility for Cycle 1 of the MAT Program and are included as Attachment A These locations are those for which the Metro Board directed (Motion 141 May 2016) FLM planning activities and represent all existing Metro rail and busway stations commuter rail stations and top 100 ridership bus stops The 269 locations represent the highest priority subset of the 661 transit stationstop locations identified in the ATSP The 269 stationstop locations are ranked according to equity safety and connectivitymobility indicators (refer to Methodology Attachment A) The highest 138 ranked (rank of 129 including ties) projects will be given an invitation to submit a letter of interest Selection criteria and review process are described further below Project proposers may submit proposals that contemplate a package of improvements for adjacent stations so long as all stations are among the eligible project locations listed in Attachment A The need-based ranking score for any such multi-station proposals will be the average of all stations included Such proposals should demonstrate a cohesive access strategy for combined station areas that justifies being treated as a single project The maximum award amount ($5 million) applies Project Proposer The Project Proposer should be the eligible recipient with most direct authority to implement the improvements contemplated by the project (typically a local jurisdiction with ownershipauthority of the public right-of-way to be improved) At time of application the project proposer agrees and certifies their ability and willingness to carry out the project improvements (noting optional roles for Metro spelled out below) agrees that any necessary reviews permit processes or other discretionary functions will be streamlined to the greatest extent possible and that key project milestones will be met including construction completioninstallation of improvements and initiation of operation in accordance with the terms established in Cycle 1 and the project scope Timely use of funds provisions are described further below Given the emphasis of Cycle 1 on rapid deployment of improvements these provisions will be strictly enforced The Project Proposer will identify and commit a specific project liaisoncoordinator who is responsible for coordinating among functional departments or groups within the jurisdiction and serves as a single point of contact for Metro The proposal shall describe the decision-making authority of the liaisoncoordinator with the expectation that they are able to make decisions regarding the delivery of the project and that they are able to confer directly with elected and other decision makers as needed To the extent that the eligible project location includes multiple jurisdictions a single jurisdiction must be identified as the lead entity at the time an LOI is submitted The lead entity has primary

11

responsibility for project delivery and compliance with the terms of the program Support for the project as proposed is required from all jurisdictions Prior to entering into a Funding Agreement for the construction phase of any multi-jurisdictional projects the jurisdictions must demonstrate an agreement between partnering jurisdictions describing roles responsibility and coordination for the project To the extent that program funds are granted to the project proposer funding is made available through a project Funding Agreement carrying specific requirements for adherence to law regulation and policy Where funding is not granted to project sponsors Metro will enter into a Memorandum of Understanding to specify roles and responsibilities for the project Metro Role Metro in addition to overseeing the MAT Program and serving as grantor may support individual project development and delivery in a number of ways At the time of solicitation Project Proposers may request Metro to be involved in the project according to the menu below It should be clearly understood that while Project Proposers may suggest a Metro role at the time of submittal Metros commitment to any of the functions below is subject to project-specific discussion and determination in the project development phase Note Any Metro activities associated with a MAT funded project will be fully paid for as part of the MAT Program project award unless otherwise determined at Metros sole discretion Metro roles may in partnership with a Project Proposer include

x Project scoping includes location-specific study community engagement feasibility review and other activities resulting in a defined scope specific improvements to be delivered and budget for the project

x Environmental review includes any required environmental study documentation and public review to comply with applicable law and regulation

x Design and engineering includes preparation of project design drawings and construction documents suitable to develop a refined budget and secure permits

x Construction includes contracting for and overseeing delivery of capital improvements associated with the project Any construction activity in local right-of-way led by Metro is subject to specific requirements intended to insure streamlined delivery and clear roles Further guidance on any potential Metro construction role will be provided during the project development stage

As a complement to proposed project improvements Metro intends to leverage other ongoing initiatives on Metro Property and right-of-way in the vicinity of the eligible project locations to improve customer safety comfort and overall transit journey with particular emphasis on the transfer experience All complementary components will be considered to the extent feasible as determined by Metro but may include any number of multi-mobility traveler convenience and information and safetysecurity enhancements

Project Size Categories In order to facilitate programming of funds and to move readily into the project development phase Project Proposers are required at the time of solicitation to select a project size category The size categories listed below differentiate the anticipated scale of improvement to be delivered

12

Table 3 FLM Project Size Categories

Project Development and Delivery Following selection an initial project development phase will be programmed This phase is intended to develop a refined scope of work and budget for project delivery including identifying ongoing roles and responsibilities among the proposer Metro and other partners over the duration of the project This phase of the project will further include any necessary design and environmental work The project development phase is a component of the MAT funded work for awarded projects should be considered in determining the initial scope and project size category at the time of LOI and will be funded as a part of the Cycle 1 funding cycle Refer to sample flow chart provided in Attachment C

Upon completion of the project development phase Metro will program a construction phase according to the scope and budget established in the project development phase Following completion of MAT funded work Metro intends to support delivery of additional improvements to station areas including but limited to providing grant assistance in seeking State Active Transportation Program (ATP) and other competitive grants Grant assistance commitment is pending future Board consideration on Grant Assistance Program criteria Letter of Interest Project sponsors invited to submit an LOI (Attachment B) will be required to include the following information in their submission

1 Project Sponsor Contact Information If project is multi-jurisdictional include identification of lead entity

2 Project Description including project name project location and extents and project scope including improvementscomponents Note FirstLast mile projects are not expected to have a refined scope and budget at the time of submission

3 Background Information Please reference any project history (including whether its inclusion any existingadopted plans) and any community engagement that has already occurred Please note whether any community-based organizations business groups or other associations have demonstrated any support or opposition to the project

4 Identification of project size category 5 Project Milestone Schedule Describe steps to ensure adherence with schedule Please

note any anticipated reviewapprovalspermit processes and any anticipated challenges and plans for how they will be addressed- specifically any anticipated right-of-way acquisition or utility relocation or other known project impediments or complicating factors

6 Description of Proposed Partner Roles and Responsibilities Please identify agencies organizations andor property owners that will be active partners in the project Indicate

Size Small 500000 $ 1000000 $ Medium 1000001 $ 3000000 $ Large 3000001 $ 5000000 $

Ranges FirstLast Mile Projects

how and when their involvement is required in order to implement andor maintain the project Please note the anticipated role for Metro

The following are optional components of the LOI submission

7 Letters of Support General letters of support from institutional or community interests separate and apart from identification of partnersroles described in 6 above

8 Funding Strategy Description of any complementaryadditive (non-MAT funded) project improvements affecting the project location including applicable funding sources and timelines

Prior to entering into a Funding Agreement project sponsors will be required to provide evidence of demonstrated support of governing bodies (eg resolutions City Manager letters of support funding commitments) with authority for public realm and right-of-way affected by the project agreeing to carry out the project as proposed and further agreeing to terms as established in the program Administrative Procedures and this cycle program A sample resolution is provided in Attachment D

x Clear and compelling project description Demonstrated efficacy of proposed project scope components to achieve program outcomes (up to 20 points) Proposal provides a clear description of the project location extent and characteristics affecting safety and access for transit riders The proposal clearly describes the intent of proposed improvements along with a generalized description of likely project elements pending the project development phase For proposals covering multipleadjacent stations the proposal describes a cohesive scope and access strategy that justifies delivery as a single project

x Project SupportPartnerships (up to 20 points) Proposal provides evidence of support from key decision makers and stakeholders Proposal includes committed and innovative partnerships with thoughtful description of intended partner roles and responsibilities The proposed projects inclusion in or consistency with an adopted plan may be used to evidence project support and commitment

x Leverage (up to 10 points) Leverage score to be assigned based on a clear and compelling description of the synergy and value added from complementary investments in the project area (as opposed to scoring by the dollar value of those investments)

13

14

x Equity Focused Communities (EFCs) (bonus 5 points) Project locations within EFCs (as identified in Attachment A) will receive 5 bonus points

Selection Process

Each LOI will be evaluated and scored by a panel of at least three (3) people Metro may include PAC members in evaluation panels provided those individuals certify that they have no stake or interest in any project under consideration A proposed list of selected projects will be presented to the Board according to the program schedule above for approval It is Metros intention to test different partnerships and delivery models in different contexts and as such ensuring project in multiple jurisdictions across a diverse geography will be an additional consideration in recommending awards

PROJECT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION Project EvaluationReporting Requirements Ongoing Project Reporting Project sponsors will submit Quarterly Progress Reports within 60 days after the close of each quarter on the last day of the months November February May and August Annually with the 4th quarter Progress Report project sponsors also will submit photos of key components and milestones demonstrating project progress or completion Project Closeout Reporting Metro will require all project sponsors to establish project goals and to identify basic performance indicators (refer to Performance Metrics at the Project Level in the ATSP) to be collected in order to measure the effectiveness of the projects Project sponsors will be asked to collect and submit data and an overall report to Metro upon completion of the project Evaluations will need to be completed before and after projects are constructed The costs for project evaluation shall be included in the project budget At minimum projects will be evaluated for their effectiveness in improving pedestrian and bicyclist safety and enhancing connectivity and mobility Additionally projects will be evaluated against the specific goals and objectives established in this program including those related to innovative partnership and project delivery Examples of the methods of evaluation are detailed below

x Safety Projects will aim to reduce the occurrence and severity of vehicle-pedestrian and

vehicle-bicyclist crashes Progress towards this goal can be measured by evaluating collisions and the details surrounding them including where they occurred when they occurred who was involved and what precipitating actions took place Progress towards this goal also can be evaluated qualitatively through user interface surveys (eg assessing perceived safety of walking and bicycling) Resources Transportation Injury Mapping System and Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS)

x ConnectivityMobility Projects will aim to increase the number and percent of people

walking or bicycling andor accessing transit on foot or bike Progress towards this goal can be measured by counting the number of pedestrians and bicyclists using the

15

constructed facilities Bicycle and pedestrian counts should be taken on a mid-week day and weekend excluding winter months The after counts should not be taken until six (6) months after the completion of the project Bicycle and pedestrian count data should be uploaded to the SCAGMetro Bike Count Data Clearinghouse Progress towards this goal also can be measured by counting the number of households within a quarter-mile of a low-stress bicycle facility the number of jobs within a quarter-mile of a low-stress bicycle facility and the number of destinations (eg schools medical centers parks etc) within a quarter-mile of a low-stress bicycle facility Progress towards this goal also can be evaluated qualitatively through user interface surveys

x Project Partnerships and Delivery Approaches Cycle 1 places a strong emphasis on

innovativeexperimental project partnerships and delivery This priority can be evaluated through the assessment of project delivery timelines as well as compiling and analyzing qualitative input from project sponsors and participants

Post-Cycle Program Evaluation Process and Metrics Following the conclusion of Cycle 1 Metro staff will submit a Cycle 1 Program Evaluation Report to the Measure M Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee and the Policy Advisory Council on the effectiveness of the program The report will be utilized to inform subsequent cycles of the MAT Program Metro staff will evaluate the program in terms of its ability to achieve the programs Cycle 1 goals as described above Metro will additionally provide annual updates to the Measure M Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee describing progress in accomplishing the program objectives Metro staff also will evaluate the programs timely use of funds The report will include a summary of program activities relative to the administration of MAT including projects programmed projects allocated projects completed to-date by project type projects completed to-date by geographic distribution and projects completed to-date by benefit to disadvantaged communities PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Requirements for Project Sponsors Project-Specific Public Participation Plan (PPP) As part of the project development phase recipients will develop a project-specific PPP (Attachment E) which will demonstrate an inclusive and extensive outreach process and is representative of a wide variety of stakeholders The PPP shall be comprehensive with a description of the full range of participatory activities including but not limited to the following

x Overall strategic vision x Schedule x Anticipated audiences x Roles and responsibilities of project partners x Potential local partners (eg community-based organizations) x Event type (eg workshops focus groups surveys telephone calls) and x Format for soliciting input

The Plan will ensure projects are vetted and supported by the community through a robust and credible process The Plan will identify specific touch-points and opportunities for the public

16

to provide input to help shape the project The Plan will further delineate how public participation is to be documented For projects led by Metro the Public Participation Plan will be developed in collaboration with the project team inclusive of all project partners with roles and responsibilities clearly delineated in the Plan Application Documentation It is not expected that project sponsors will have engaged in broad based outreach at the time of submission To the extent that there may have been prior public stakeholder involvement andor established partnerships project sponsors must provide evidence within the LOI submittal pursuant to the project readiness requirements PROJECT READINESS At the time of LOI submittal all proposed projects will be evaluated for their demonstrated readiness to begin the work and ability to complete the project noting that it is not required that Cycle 1 MAT projects will have prior planning work at the time of solicitation Any known impediments to completing the project will be taken into consideration including but not limited to failure to provide evidence of necessary inter- andor intra-agency coordination issues with community support anticipated issues with securing approvals for work relating to right-of-way acquisition and utility relocation or any pending or threatened litigation Prior to the execution of a Cooperative Agreement Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or Funding Agreement (FA) project sponsors will be required to provide certification that any complementary fund sources are committed to the project Funding is considered committed if it is included specifically in a programming document adopted by the governing board or council responsible for the administration of the funding and recognized by Metro as available at the time the funds are needed

Programming of MAT funds for project phase work will be contingent on evidence of prior phase completion (eg completion of final design to advance to construction) Exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis Note No prerequisite work is required for programming for work on the project initiation phase including location-specific studies community engagement feasibility reviews and other activities resulting in a refined scope specific improvements to be delivered and budget for the project

Table 4 Milestones for Allocation

Phase Prerequisite Milestone(s) for Allocation ScopingPlanning Conceptual Engineering Environmental Review

None

Inclusion in 5-Year Program of Projects (if applicable) Conceptual Engineering Report

17

Construction Inclusion in 5-Year Program of Projects (if applicable) Approved environmental document Right-of-way certification (if applicable) 100 PSampE All applicable permits

TIMELY USE OF FUNDS MAT funds will be programmed on a phase-by-phase basis (vs for the project in its entirety) Project sponsors must demonstrate timely use of funds and effective implementation of each project phase by

x Executing an Agreement or Funding Agreement (FA) within 60 days of receiving formal transmittal of the Agreement or FA from Metro

x Meeting the project milestone and deliverable due dates as stated in the project schedule and budget and scope of work

x Timely submitting of the quarterly progressexpense reports x Procuring contractconsultant to complete project phase scope of work within six

months of Agreement or FA execution with Metro x Expending at least a portion of MAT funds within 12 months of the date of

Agreement or FA execution Use of funds includes issuance of an award of a consultant contract or encumbrance of staff labor charges by project sponsor

x Expending project phase funds granted within 36 months from the date the Agreement or FA was fully executed

For projects or project phases led by Metro project sponsors are required to ensure that they will facilitate timely implementation by adhering to the following milestones

x Executing a Cooperative Agreement or MOU within 60 days of receiving formal transmittal of the Cooperative Agreement or MOU from Metro

x Maintaining a staff liaison and adequate staff capacity as described in the project proposal and MOU

x Adhering to any other terms in the MOU Failure to comply with these requirements may result in deobligation of project funding A sample project timeline is included below

Table 5 Sample Project Timeline

Phase Duration PlanningConceptual Engineering 6 months

Environmental Studies 6 months ROW ActivitiesAcquisition Design Engineering 6 months

18

Advertise Construction 1 months

Award Construction Contract 5 months Construction 12 months

36 months If a project is inactive (no expenditures for 12 months for a project phase from the date of Agreement or FA execution) projects may have their funds deobligated and reprogrammed to the next priority project in the appropriate programmatic category in the current cycle (ie FirstLast Mile and Active Transportation Corridors) Projects experiencing deobligation may compete in future MAT funding cycles or they may pursue alternative funding sources The Cycle 1 MAT Recommended Project Funding List will include Tier 1 and Tier 2 project priorities Tier 2 projects (a contingency list) may receive funding in the event of Tier 1 project deobligations and reprogramming or in the event of Tier 1 project cost savings Tier 2 projects will only remain eligible for Cycle 1 funding until the next programming cycle when project priorities may be adjusted to reflect updated regional needs Metro may extend the deadlines for expenditures of funds if it finds that an unforeseen and extraordinary circumstance beyond the control of the responsible agency has occurred that justifies the extension The extension will not exceed the period of delay directly attributed to the extraordinary circumstance and will in no event be for more than 20 months per project phase No deadline may be extended more than once for each project phase It is imperative to the success of the MAT program that project sponsors work with Metro representatives in a cooperative process It is the project sponsors responsibility to keep Metro apprised of significant issues affecting project delivery and costs Ongoing communication resolves issues facilitates compliance with Metro policies and contributes greatly toward ensuring that adequate funds will be available when they are needed ATTACHMENTS

x Attachment A Screening and Prioritization Methodology x Attachment B Letter of Interest Form x Attachment C Project Development Process Flow Charts x Attachment D Sample Resolution x Attachment E Public Participation Plan Worksheet

$WWDFKPHQW$6FUHHQLQJDQG3ULRULWL]DWLRQ

0HWKRGRORJ

Measure M Metro Active Transport (MAT) Program Cycle One Screening and Prioritization Methodology

Background Project selection builds on the framework of Metros FirstLast Mile Strategic Plan (2014) and Active Transportation Strategic Plan (ATSP 2016) The ATSP includes a roughly 2000-mile regional network of active transportation facilities and 661 existing and under construction transit station locations Note that equity is a key factor in prioritizing potential projects and a number of metrics are used within this methodology The Metro Board acted to adopt Equity Focused Communities on June 27 2019 This methodology accounts for a variety of equity metrics EFCs will be utilized in Cycle 1 of the MAT program as part of the project selection process as detailed in the Cycle 1 solicitation The project listing attached to this methodology denotes which project locations are located in or traverse EFCs for the FirstLast Mile Priority Network For the Active Transportation Corridor category EFCs will be included in the qualitative evaluation Screening Process Active Transportation Corridor The screening involved identifying projects greater than three miles and traversing multiple municipal jurisdictions The ATSP corridor list initially included 186 corridors Once corridors less than three miles were eliminated 160 corridors remained From that total number 120 corridors were multiple-jurisdiction and 40 were single jurisdiction The median distance of a corridor on the resulting list is 11 miles FirstLast Mile Priority Network The FirstLast Mile Priority Network defined in this program stems from Metro Board Motion 141 (May 2016) The motion directed firstlast mile planning activities for the existing transit network including Metro Rail Busway and Metrolink stations as well as the top 100 performing bus stops in the county These categories collectively yield 269 station areas which form the universe of eligible project locations for cycle one of the MAT program Consistent with ATSP methodology a station area is defined by a frac12 mile buffer around the closest major intersection to the actual station or stop and is inclusive of adjacent (eg bus-to-rail transfer) stops Prioritization Process Active Transportation Corridor A prioritization methodology was then applied to the list of 160 corridors The prioritization methodology took into consideration the following specific factors

1 Equity o Disadvantaged Community (DAC) Scores

Data Calculation To calculate the Disadvantaged Community (DAC) score for each ATSP corridor we first created a three-mile buffer around each corridor and identified the census tracts that were within or that intersected the buffer We then multiplied the DAC score for each

identified census tract by its population and summed the resulting scores These scores were then divided by the sum of the total population of all the identified census tracts

o Healthy Places Index (HPI) Scores Data Calculation To calculate the HPI score for each ATSP corridor we first created a three-mile buffer around each corridor and identified the census tracts that are within or that intersect the buffer We then multiplied the HPI score for each identified census tract by its population and summed the resulting scores These scores were then divided by the sum of the total population of all the identified census tracts To facilitate an easier sorting process the resulting scores were multiplied by negative one

o Communities of Concern (CoC) Scores Data Calculation See Application Resources for the 2018 DAC Scores for SCP spreadsheet to access CoC scores To calculate the CoC score for each ATSP corridor we first created a three-mile buffer around each corridor and identified the census tracts that were within or that intersected the buffer We then multiplied the CoC score for each identified census tract by its population and summed the resulting scores These scores were then divided by the sum of the total population of all the identified census tracts

2 Safety o Safety Data Scores (rates of bikepedestrian collisions)

Data Calculation See Application Resources for the Safety Data spreadsheet to access safety data scores To calculate the safety score for each ATSP corridor we first created a three-mile buffer around each corridor and identified the census tracts that were within or that intersected the buffer We then summed (1) the total number of pedestrian- and bicyclist-related collisions (in which a pedestrian or bicyclist was either injured or killed) and (2) the total population for all the identified census tracts Finally we divided the total active transportation-related collisions by the total population

o Intersection with SCAGs Los Angeles County High Injury Network (HIN) or the City of Los Angeles HIN Data Calculation The High Injury Network (HIN) was mapped with the ATSP corridors If the HIN intersected with a corridor in any way the corridor was noted as having HIN interaction

3 MobilityConnectivity o Intersection with Metros FirstLast Mile (FLM) 269 Prioritized

StationsStops

Data Calculation The 269 transit stop dataset was mapped with the ATSP corridors A half-mile buffer was drawn around each corridor and the transit stop data was overlaid on top of the buffer to identify any intersections between the two datasets

o Intersection with SCAGs Regional Bikeway Network (RBN) Data Calculation The RBN was mapped with the ATSP corridors If the RBN intersected with a corridor in any way the corridor was noted as having RBN interaction

o Intersection with Measure M Planned RailTransit Project Alignments Data Calculation Measure M planned railtransit project alignments were mapped with the ATSP corridors If the Measure M project alignments intersected with a corridor in any way the corridor was noted as having a Measure M interaction

Staff divided the distribution of DAC CoC HPI and Safety composite scores into quintiles with associated rangesbins Quintile scores of one to five (1-5) were assigned for a range of scores Intersection scores (Yes=1 No=0) were assigned for HIN FLM Connectivity RBN and Measure M Planned RailTransit factors A point is also given to corridors traversing multiple jurisdictions Staff then tabulated scores for all corridors with a subtotal of 25 possible points that were normalized into a final total of 30 points for the quantitative evaluation Example a project scoring 24 out of 25 points is equal to 288 points out of 30 points The final score is then rounded to the nearest whole number in this case 29 points The maximum score that any project may receive is 100 points 30 points are scored through the quantitative analysis and 70 points will be scored through the qualitative evaluation of the LOI

Prioritization Criteria Total Possible

EQUITY Disadvantage Communities (DAC) 5 Healthy Places Index (HPI) 5 Communities of Concern (CoC) 5 SAFETY Safety (BikePed Crash Rates) 5 Safety (HIN Intersection) 1 MOBILITYCONNECTIVITY FLM Connectivity 1 RBN 1 Measure M Projects 1 EXTRA POINT Multi-Jurisdictional 1 Subtotal Points 25 Final Total Points 30

Subtotal points were normalized to 30 points

FirstLast Mile Priority Network As firstlast mile plans typically address the area within a half-mile of a station station areas were examined using half-mile buffers around the closest major intersection to the station Using intersections also allows the process to group adjacent stations and stops consistent with the data and analysis approach for the ATSP The prioritization methodology took into consideration the following specific factors

1 Equity o Disadvantage Communities (DAC) Scores

Data Calculation The CalEnviroscreen scores of all census tracts within and intersecting the half-mile buffer were multiplied by their populations the resulting score summed and ultimately divided by the total population of those tracts

o Healthy Places Index (HPI) Scores Data Calculation The HPI scores of all census tracts within and intersecting the half-mile buffer were multiplied by their populations the resulting score summed and ultimately divided by the total population of those tracts

o Communities of Concern (CoC) Scores Data Calculation The CoC scores of all census tracts within and intersecting the half-mile buffer were multiplied by their populations the resulting score summed and ultimately divided by the total population of those tracts

2 Safety o Transportation Injury Mapping SystemStatewide Integrated Traffic

Records System Data Calculation Collisions involving bicyclists and pedestrians within the last five years of available data were summed within the half-mile buffer of each of the station intersections and were weighted by their populations

3 MobilityConnectivity o ATSP Strategic Plan 2016

Data Calculation Following the existing ATSP methodology ridership data is a sum of all average daily latest available MTA ridership (2018 Metro data and 2016 municipal operator data) collapsed at an intersection that captures all stops and stations within a 300-foot radius of the intersection

Stations are sorted into quintiles by their rank in each data source and allotted points based on the resulting quintile which were then multiplied by the respective weight for each of the criteria Stations with the most points rank the highest

Prioritization Criteria Weight Total Possible

EQUITY Disadvantage Communities (DAC) 10 50 Healthy Places Index (HPI) 10 50 Communities of Concern (CoC) 10 50 SAFETY Safety (BikePed Collision) 30 150 MOBILITYCONNECTIVITY Ridership 15 75

MAT ProgramFirstLast Mile Ranked Locations List

Name Primary Route Type

Rail Busway Name Subregion City

Total Weighted

PointsRank Selection

pointsContains

EFCs

El Monte Busway Bus Silver San Gabriel Valley El Monte 345 1 30 XGrand LRT Blue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 345 1 30 XLAX Aviation LRT Crenshaw Westside Cities Los Angeles 345 1 3023rd LRT Blue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 340 4 29 XExpo Park USC LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 340 4 29 XJefferson USC LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 330 6 27 XCentral 6th Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 325 7 26 X

Union Station HRT BRT Commuter

RedPurple SilverGold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 325 7 26 X

1st Central - Little Tokyo LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 320 9 25 XAvalon Vernon Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 320 9 25 XSan Pedro LRT Blue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 320 9 25 XAvalon Florence Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 315 12 23 XCivic Center HRT RedPurple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 315 12 23 XExpo Vermont LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 315 12 23 XFigueroa 7th BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 315 12 23 XHill 1st BRT Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 315 12 23 XPershing Square HRT RedPurple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 315 12 23 XPico LRT ExpoBlue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 315 12 23 X6th San Pedro Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 310 19 22 XAlameda 7th Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 310 19 22 X110 HOV Adams BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 305 21 21 XAliso Pico LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 305 21 21 XBroadway Vernon Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 300 23 20 XFigueroa 23rd BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 300 23 20 X

Pacific Slauson Bus Gateway Cities Huntington Park 300 23 20 X

4th Colorado LRT Expo Westside Cities Santa Monica 295 26 18Central 7th Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 X

Cypress Park Lincoln Heights LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 X

Daly Broadway Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 XFlower Washington BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 XHarbor Transitway 37th BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 XHollywood Western HRT Red Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 XOlive 5th BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 XSan Pedro 7th Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 XWashington LRT Blue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 295 26 18 X

Boyle Heights Mariachi Plaza LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 290 36 17 X

Broadway Florence Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 290 36 17 XCrenshaw Adams Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 290 36 17 XLAX City Bus Center Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 290 36 17Expo La Brea LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 285 40 16 XHollywood Highland HRT Red Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 285 40 16 XHollywood Vine HRT Red Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 285 40 16 XLong Beach Transit Mall LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 285 40 16 XUnion Olympic Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 285 40 16 XAnaheim St LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 280 45 14 XColorado 17th LRT Expo Westside Cities Santa Monica 280 45 14El Segundo LRT Green South Bay El Segundo 280 45 14Harbor Transitway Slauson BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 280 45 14 XVermont Pico Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 280 45 14 XVermont Venice Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 280 45 14 X

2nd StBroadway (New) LRT Regional Connector Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 275 51 13 X

2nd StHope (New) LRT Regional Connector Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 275 51 13 X

Artesia LRT Blue Gateway Cities Compton 275 51 13Compton LRT Blue Gateway Cities Compton 275 51 13 X

El Monte Commuter Rail

San Bernardino San Gabriel Valley El Monte 275 51 13 X

Eligible for MAT Program Cycle 1

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Firestone LRT Blue Gateway Cities Unincorporated 275 51 13 XSepulveda BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 275 51 13 XSoto Olympic Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 275 51 13 XVermont Vernon Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 275 51 13 XAvalon Manchester Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 270 60 12 XChinatown LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 270 60 12 XFairfax Hub Washington Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 270 60 12 XFigueroa Washington BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 270 60 12 XOlympic 26th LRT Expo Westside Cities Santa Monica 270 60 12Slauson LRT Blue Gateway Cities Unincorporated 270 60 12 XVermont Adams Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 270 60 12 XVermont Florence Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 270 60 12 XWitmer 6th Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 270 60 12 XAvalon LRT Blue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 265 69 10 XAviation Century (New) LRT Crenshaw Westside Cities Los Angeles 265 69 10 XCentral Vernon Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 265 69 10 XDel Amo LRT Blue Gateway Cities Unincorporated 265 69 10Figueroa Vernon Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 265 69 10 XFlorence LRT Blue Gateway Cities Unincorporated 265 69 10 XFlower Olympic BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 265 69 10 XHarbor Beacon Park BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 265 69 10 XHoover Venice Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 265 69 10 XMariposa LRT Green South Bay El Segundo 265 69 10Pacific Clarendon Bus Gateway Cities Huntington Park 265 69 10 X

Van Nuys Metrolink Commuter Rail Ventura San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 265 69 10 X

Vermont Slauson Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 265 69 10 XVernon LRT Blue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 265 69 10 XAlvarado Sunset Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 260 83 9 XWestern Venice Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 260 83 9 X1st LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 255 85 8 XBeverly Vermont HRT Red Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 255 85 8 XCulver City LRT Expo Westside Cities Los Angeles 255 85 8Expo Western LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 255 85 8 XHarbor Freeway LRT Green South Bay Los Angeles 255 85 8 XLa Brea Santa Monica Bus Westside Cities West Hollywood 255 85 8 XMacArthur Park Westlake HRT RedPurple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 255 85 8 X

Pomona - Downtown Commuter Rail

San Bernardino San Gabriel Valley Pomona 255 85 8 X

Vermont Olympic Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 255 85 8 XWestern Santa Monica Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 255 85 8 X5th LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 250 95 7 XEast LA Civic Center LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Unincorporated 250 95 7 XFigueroa Sunset Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 250 95 7 XNormandie Olympic Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 250 95 7 XSpring 1st BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 250 95 7 XVan Nuys Vanowen Bus San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 250 95 7 XWestern Slauson Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 250 95 7 XBeacon St1st St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 245 102 5 XExpo Crenshaw LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5 XExpo Farmdale LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5 XLa Cienega 3rd Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5PCH LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 245 102 5 XVermont Athens Bus South Bay Unincorporated 245 102 5 XVermont Santa Monica HRT Red Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5 XVermont Washington Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5 XVine Santa Monica Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5 XWestern Washington Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5 XWilshire Normandie HRT Purple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 245 102 5 XCadillac Venice Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 240 113 4 XDouglas LRT Green South Bay El Segundo 240 113 4

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Expo Sepulveda LRT Expo Westside Cities Los Angeles 240 113 4Fairfax 3rd Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 240 113 4Fairfax Beverly Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 240 113 4

Glendale Commuter Rail

Antelope Ventura Arroyo Verdugo Glendale 240 113 4 X

Highland Santa Monica Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 240 113 4 XNormandie Venice Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 240 113 4 XSoto LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 240 113 4 XSoto Whittier Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 240 113 4 XWestern Olympic Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 240 113 4 XHawthorne Lennox LRT Green South Bay Hawthorne 235 124 3 XLa Brea Venice Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 235 124 3 XWatts Towers 103rd LRT Blue Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 235 124 3 XWillowbrook LRT BlueGreen Gateway Cities Unincorporated 235 124 3 XWilshire Western LRT Purple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 235 124 3 XCrenshaw Venice Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 230 129 1 XCrenshaw Washington Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 230 129 1 XDel Mar LRT Gold Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 230 129 1 XExpo Bundy LRT Expo Westside Cities Los Angeles 230 129 1

Fairfax Santa Monica Bus Westside Cities West Hollywood 230 129 1 X

Harbor Transitway Manchester BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 230 129 1 X

La Cienega Beverly Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 230 129 1Sunset Vermont HRT Red Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 230 129 1 XVermont 120th Bus South Bay Unincorporated 230 129 1 XVermont Manchester Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 230 129 1 X

Brand Broadway Bus Arroyo Verdugo Glendale 225 139 X

Cal State LA BRT Commuter

SilverSan Bernardino Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 225 139

Crenshaw LRT Green South Bay Hawthorne 225 139 XEcho Park Sunset Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 225 139 X

Harbor Gateway Transit Center Bus South Bay Los Angeles 225 139

La Cienega Jefferson LRT Expo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 225 139 XNorth Hollywood HRTBRT RedOrange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 225 139 XUSC Medical Center BRT Silver Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 225 139 XWilshire Vermont HRT RedPurple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 225 139 XFairfax Venice Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 220 148 XHeritage Square Arroyo LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 220 148 XMemorial Park LRT Gold Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 220 148 X

Western Martin Luther King Jr Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 220 148 X

Benton Way Beverly Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 215 152 XCentral Colorado Bus Arroyo Verdugo Glendale 215 152 XCrenshaw Slauson Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 215 152 XLong Beach LRT Green Gateway Cities Lynwood 215 152 XMaravilla LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Unincorporated 215 152 XOcean Wilshire Bus Westside Cities Santa Monica 215 152Pacific Florence Bus Gateway Cities Unincorporated 215 152 XPacific15th St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 215 152 XPacific1st St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 215 152 XPacific3rd St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 215 152 XAtlantic Cesar E Chavez Bus San Gabriel Valley Monterey Park 210 162 XAtlantic Whittier Bus Central Los Angeles Unincorporated 210 162 XAzusa Citrus LRT Gold San Gabriel Valley Glendora 210 162 XBundy Santa Monica Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 210 162Rampart 3rd Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 210 162 XVan Nuys Roscoe Bus San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 210 162 XWilshire 4th Bus Westside Cities Santa Monica 210 162Alvarado Beverly Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 205 169 X

NOT Eligible for MAT Program Cycle 1

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Burbank Commuter Rail

Antelope Ventura Arroyo Verdugo Burbank 205 169 X

Expo Westwood LRT Expo Westside Cities Los Angeles 205 169Figueroa St190th St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 205 169Pacific11th St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 205 169 XPacific7th St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 205 169 XSepulveda Santa Monica Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 205 169 XUniversal City HRT Red San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 205 169Western Pico Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 205 169 XWestern Vernon Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 205 169 XAtlantic Florence Bus Gateway Cities Cudahy 200 179 XBalboa BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 200 179Cherry Pacific Coast Hwy Bus Gateway Cities Long Beach 200 179 X

Commerce Montebello Commuter Rail Riverside Gateway Cities Montebello 200 179 X

Crenshaw Pico Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 200 179 XLake LRT Gold Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 200 179 XRedondo Beach LRT Green South Bay Redondo Beach 200 179Van Nuys Sherman Way Bus San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 200 179 XAtlantic Olympic Bus Central Los Angeles Unincorporated 195 187 X

Commerce Commuter Rail Orange Co Gateway Cities Commerce 195 187 X

Manchester Aviation (New) LRT Crenshaw South Bay Inglewood 195 187 X

Northridge Commuter Rail Ventura San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 195 187

Pacific17th St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 195 187 XReseda BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 195 187 XVan Nuys Chase Bus San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 195 187 XVermont 92nd Bus South Bay Unincorporated 195 187 XWestern Adams Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 195 187 XWilshireLa Cienega (New) HRT Purple Westside Cities Beverly Hills 195 187Azusa Alameda LRT Gold San Gabriel Valley Azusa 190 197 XPacific LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 190 197 X

Claremont Commuter Rail

San Bernardino San Gabriel Valley Claremont 185 199

Fillmore LRT Gold Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 185 199Indiana LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Unincorporated 185 199 XLa Brea Florence (New) LRT Crenshaw South Bay Inglewood 185 199 XLeimert Park (New) LRT Crenshaw Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 185 199 XVeteran Federal Building Bus Westside Cities Unincorporated 185 199 XWestern Melrose Bus Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 185 199 XCollegian Cesar E Chavez Bus San Gabriel Valley Monterey Park 180 206 XHighland Park LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 180 206 XNational Palms LRT Expo Westside Cities Los Angeles 180 206Allen LRT Gold Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 175 209

Chatsworth Commuter Rail BRT

Ventura Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 175 209

Crenshaw Martin Luther King Jr (New) LRT Crenshaw Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 175 209 X

Harbor FwyPacific Coast Hwy BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 175 209 X

Harbor Transitway Rosecrans BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 175 209 X

Lancaster Commuter Rail Antelop North Los Angeles

County Lancaster 175 209 X

Canoga BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 170 215 XHoefner Whittier Bus Gateway Cities Unincorporated 170 215 XVan Nuys Nordhoff Bus San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 170 215 XNorwalk LRT Green Gateway Cities Norwalk 165 218 XWestwood Wilshire Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 165 218 XWilshireLa Brea (New) HRT Purple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 165 218Lakewood LRT Green Gateway Cities Downey 160 221 X

Pomona - North Commuter Rail

San Bernardino San Gabriel Valley Pomona 160 221

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Santa Fe Springs Norwalk Commuter Rail

Orange CoPerris Valley

Gateway Cities Norwalk 160 221 X

Sierra Madre Villa LRT Gold Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 160 221Woodley BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 160 221 X

Baldwin Park Commuter Rail

San Bernardino San Gabriel Valley Baldwin Park 155 226 X

Goodrich Louis Bus Gateway Cities Commerce 155 226 XHyde Park (New) LRT Crenshaw Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 155 226 XSherman Way BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 155 226 X

South Pasadena LRT Gold Arroyo Verdugo South Pasadena 155 226

West Florence (New) LRT Crenshaw South Bay Inglewood 155 226 XWillow LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 155 226 XDuarte Highland LRT San Gabriel Valley Duarte 150 233

Industry Commuter Rail Perris Valley San Gabriel Valley Industry 150 233

Southwest Museum LRT Gold Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 150 233 XChannel 7th Bus Gateway Cities Long Beach 145 236Harbor FwyCarson St BRT Silver South Bay Unincorporated 145 236Oakford Whittier Bus Central Los Angeles Unincorporated 145 236 XWilshireFairfax (New) HRT Purple Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 145 236Motor Venice Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 140 240Sepulveda Slauson Bus Westside Cities Culver City 140 240Pacific19th St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 135 242 XPacific21st St BRT Silver South Bay Los Angeles 135 242 X

Palmdale Commuter Rail

North Los Angeles County Palmdale 135 242 X

San Fernando Sylmar Commuter Rail San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 135 242 X

Overland Venice Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 130 246

Burbank Airport Commuter Rail Antelope Arroyo Verdugo Burbank 125 247 X

McBean Regional Transit Center Bus North Los Angeles County Santa Clarita 125 247

Pierce College BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 125 247

Covina Commuter Rail

San Bernardino San Gabriel Valley Covina 120 250

Westwood Weyburn Bus Westside Cities Los Angeles 120 250 X

Acton Vincent Grade Commuter Rail Antelope North Los Angeles

County Unincorporated 115 252

De Soto BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 115 252 XMyrtle Duarte LRT San Gabriel Valley Monrovia 115 252Santa Clara 1st LRT San Gabriel Valley Arcadia 115 252Van Nuys BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 115 252 XWardlow LRT Blue Gateway Cities Long Beach 115 252Laurel Canyon BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 110 258 X

Newhall Commuter Rail Antelope North Los Angeles

County Santa Clarita 110 258

Roscoe BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 110 258 XWarner Center Transit Hub BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 105 261

West Campus State University Bus Gateway Cities Long Beach 105 261

Nordhoff BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 100 263 XWoodman BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 100 263 X

Santa Clarita Commuter Rail Antelope North Los Angeles

Tampa BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 95 265 XValley College BRT Orange San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 90 267 X

Via Princessa Commuter Rail Antelope North Los Angeles

Ximeno Pacific Coast Hwy Bus Gateway Cities Long Beach 90 267

MAT ProgramActive Transportation Corridors Ranked List

Corridor From To Total Miles

Subregion Jurisdiction DAC (1-5)

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Number of Jurisdictions

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

WHITTIER BLVD CENTRAL AVE WASHINGTON BLVD 1286 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities Los Angeles Montebello Pico Rivera Unincorporated Whittier 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 30 1

RANDOLPH AVE RAIL ROW E SLAUSON AVE LA RIVER 703 Gateway Cities Bell Commerce Huntington Park Unincorporated 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 30 1

CENTRAL AVE-COMPTON CREEK

E 1ST ST E ARTESIA BLVD 1305 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities Compton Los Angeles Unincorporated 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 30 1

AVALON BLVD E IMPERIAL HWY HARRY BRIDGES BLVD

1106 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities South Bay Cities

Carson Los Angeles Unincorporated 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 0 1 29 4

CENTURY-MLK-PE ROW ALAMEDA ST SALT LAKE- UP-PE RR ROW

444 Gateway Cities Lynwood South Gate Unincorporated 5 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 29 4

ALAMEDA SPRING ST LA RIVER 1612 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities South Bay Cities

Carson Compton Huntington Park Long Beach Los Angeles Lynwood Unincorporated Vernon 5 5 5 4 0 1 1 1 1 28 6

GARVEY-RAMONA WHITTIER BLVD SP RR 1204 Central Los Angeles San Gabriel Valley Alhambra El Monte Monterey Park Rosemead South El Monte Unincorporated 5 5 5 5 1 0 1 0 1 28 6

SALT LAKE- UP-PE RR ROW LA RIVER COYOTE CREEK 1478 Gateway Cities Artesia Bell Bellflower Cerritos Cudahy Downey Paramount South Gate Vernon 5 5 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 28 6

FIRESTONE-MANCHESTER CULVER BLVD LA RIVER 1641 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Westside Cities

Inglewood Los Angeles South Gate Unincorporated 5 5 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 28 6

BROADWAY-SPRING N MISSION RD S MAIN ST 4477 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 5 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 0 28 6

EXPOSITION BLVD W JEFFERSON BLVD S MAIN ST 4615 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 5 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 0 28 6

FLOWER-WASHINGTON W 2ND ST LA RIVER 4913 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 5 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 0 28 6

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BALLONA CREEK S CENTRAL AVE 726 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 5 5 5 4 1 1 1 1 0 28 6

1ST-2ND-GLENDALE FLETCHER DR EASTERN AVE 851 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles Unincorporated 5 5 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 28 6

IMPERIAL HWY COAST ORANGE COUNTY LINE

2719 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities LAX South Bay Cities Westside Cities

Downey Hawthorne Inglewood La Mirada Los Angeles Lynwood Norwalk South Gate Unincorporated 5 5 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 26 15

REDONDO BEACH BLVD FLAGLER LN SALT LAKE- UP-PE RR ROW

1374 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Compton Gardena Lawndale Los Angeles Paramount Redondo Beach Unincorporated 5 4 4 5 0 1 1 1 1 26 15

RIO HONDO PECK RD LA RIVER 1865 Gateway Cities San Gabriel Valley Arcadia Bell Gardens El Monte Montebello Pico Rivera Rosemead South El Monte South Gate Unincorporated 5 4 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 26 15

SLAUSON SEPULVEDA BLVD LA RIVER 1247 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities Huntington Park Los Angeles Maywood Unincorporated Vernon 5 5 5 3 1 0 1 1 1 26 15

FLORENCE AVE BNSF RAILROAD ALAMEDA ST 592 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities South Bay Cities

Inglewood Los Angeles Unincorporated 5 5 5 3 1 0 1 1 1 26 15

HUNTINGTON-MAIN E HUNTINGTON DR E IMPERIAL HWY 2342 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles Arcadia Los Angeles San Marino South Pasadena Unincorporated 5 5 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 26 15

WESTERN AVE IMPERIAL HWY W ANAHEIM ST 993 South Bay Cities Gardena Los Angeles Torrance Unincorporated 4 5 5 4 1 1 1 0 1 26 15

TELEGRAPH RD GARFIELD AVE IMPERIAL HWY 899 Gateway Cities Montebello Pico Rivera Santa Fe Springs Unincorporated 5 4 4 5 1 1 1 0 1 26 15

CRENSHAW-ARDEN HIGHLAND AVE PCH 2274 Central Los Angeles South Bay Cities Gardena Hawthorne Inglewood Los Angeles Torrance Unincorporated 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 25 23

HILLCREST-HAWTHORNE SLAUSON BLVD PALOS VERDES DR 1595 Central Los Angeles South Bay Cities Hawthorne Inglewood Lawndale Los Angeles Rolling Hills Estates Torrance Unincorporated 4 5 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 25 23

MISSION-VALLEY E CESAR E CHAVEZ AVE

LA PUENTE CREEK 1680 Central Los Angeles San Gabriel Valley Alhambra El Monte Industry Los Angeles Rosemead San Gabriel Unincorporated 5 4 5 3 1 1 1 0 1 25 23

LANCASTER-SANTA CLARITA-SFV

AVE H SP RR BURBANK 6109 Arroyo Verdugo North Los Angeles County San Fernando Valley

Burbank Lancaster Los Angeles Palmdale San Fernando Santa Clarita Unincorporated 3 4 4 5 1 1 1 1 1 25 23

EL SEGUNDO BLVD COAST ALAMEDA ST 1197 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Westside Cities

Compton El Segundo Hawthorne Los Angeles Unincorporated 5 5 5 4 0 0 1 0 1 25 23

GLENOAKS BLVD FOOTHILL FWY VERDUGO WASH 1709 Arroyo Verdugo San Fernando Valley Burbank Glendale Los Angeles San Fernando 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 25 23

CHAVEZ-SUNSET-RIGGIN N FAIRFAX AVE ALHAMBRA WASH 1837 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities San Gabriel Valley

Los Angeles Monterey Park Rosemead Unincorporated 4 4 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 25 23

AVE 19-FIGUEROA COLORADO BLVD LA RIVER 6615 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 4 5 4 4 1 1 1 1 0 25 23

ARLINGTON-VAN NESS FRANKLIN AVE E MANCHESTER AVE 1013 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 5 5 5 4 1 1 0 0 0 25 23

SOTO MISSION ROAD LA RIVER 504 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities Los Angeles Vernon 5 5 5 3 0 1 1 0 1 25 23

PECK RD HUNTINGTON DR WHITTIER BLVD 1173 Gateway Cities San Gabriel Valley Arcadia El Monte Industry Irwindale Monrovia South El Monte Unincorporated 4 4 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 24 33

FREMONT-PASADENA E UNION ST WHITTIER BLVD 928 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles Alhambra Monterey Park Pasadena South Pasadena Unincorporated 4 5 3 5 1 0 1 0 1 24 33

QUINTILES OR YN SCORESEQUITY SAFETY MOBILITYCONNECTIVITY

SUBREGIONS AND CITIES

Updated List 03-12-2020 A subtotal of 25 possible points were normalized into a final total of 30 points Page 1 of 5

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

WALNUT CREEK SAN GABRIEL RIVER FAIRPLEX DR 1447 San Gabriel Valley Baldwin Park Covina San Dimas West Covina 4 4 4 5 1 1 0 0 1 24 33

WILSHIRE-SAN VICENTE OCEAN AVE CENTRAL AVE 2014 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Beverly Hills Los Angeles Santa Monica Unincorporated 4 4 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 24 33

BEVERLY-TEMPLE SANTA MONICA BLVD LA RIVER 970 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Beverly Hills Los Angeles West Hollywood 4 4 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 24 33

SAN FERNANDO VERDUGO AVE FIGUEROA ST 829 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles Burbank Glendale Los Angeles 4 4 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 24 33

FLETCHER-SILVER LAKE SILVER LAKE BLVD EAGLE ROCK BLVD 4244 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 4 4 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 24 33

TOWNE AVE BASE LINE RD SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LINE

711 San Gabriel Valley Claremont Pomona 4 5 4 3 1 1 0 1 1 24 33

LA RIVER CANOGA AVE COYOTE CREEK 5731 Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities San Fernando Valley

Bell Compton Cudahy Long Beach Los Angeles Paramount South Gate Unincorporated Vernon 5 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 41

ARROW-BONITA LIVE OAK AVE SAN ANTONIO WASH 1716 San Gabriel Valley Azusa Claremont Covina Irwindale La Verne Pomona San Dimas Unincorporated 3 3 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 23 41

BADILLO-RAMONA MISSION-VALLEY SPRR

W BONITA AVE 1335 San Gabriel Valley Baldwin Park Covina El Monte San Dimas Unincorporated West Covina 4 3 4 4 0 1 1 1 1 23 41

FIRESTONE-SPRR LA RIVER ARTESIA BLVD 1227 Gateway Cities Downey La Mirada Norwalk Santa Fe Springs South Gate 5 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 41

TUJUNGA WASH HANSEN DAM BIKE PATH

PACOIMA DIVERSION CHANNEL

301 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 5 5 5 2 0 1 0 1 0 23 41

VERMONT LOS FELIZ BLVD W ANAHEIM ST 2282 Central Los Angeles South Bay Cities Los Angeles Unincorporated 5 5 5 1 1 0 1 0 1 23 41

PICO-GATEWAY-OCEAN PARK

BARNARD WAY CENTRAL AVE 1558 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Los Angeles Santa Monica 4 4 3 4 0 1 1 1 1 23 41

ARTESIA-HERONDO COAST ORANGE COUNTY LINE

2295 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Artesia Bellflower Carson Cerritos Compton La Mirada Long Beach Los Angeles Redondo Beach Torrance 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 22 48

DUARTE-EL MONTE W HUNTINGTON DR RIO HONDO 335 San Gabriel Valley Arcadia El Monte Temple City 3 4 3 5 1 1 0 0 1 22 48

ALAMEDA-UPRR LA RIVER HARRY BRIDGES BLVD

831 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Carson Los Angeles Unincorporated 5 4 5 1 0 1 1 0 1 22 48

MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD COAST CRENSHAW BLVD 495 South Bay Cities Lawndale Manhattan Beach Redondo Beach Unincorporated 3 4 4 3 1 0 1 1 1 22 48

MISSION-SPRR-UPRR SAN GABRIEL RIVER SAN ANTONIO WASH 2021 San Gabriel Valley Industry Pomona Unincorporated 4 4 3 4 0 1 1 0 1 22 48

SPRR-BURBANK WESTERN LASSEN ST LA RIVER 2003 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles San Fernando Valley

Burbank Glendale Los Angeles 4 3 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 22 48

FAIRPLEX-RIDGEWAY BONITA AVE SAN JOSE WASH 378 San Gabriel Valley La Verne Pomona 3 5 2 4 1 1 0 1 1 22 48

BNSF-CARSON AVALON BLVD W SEPULVEDA BLVD 473 South Bay Cities Carson Los Angeles 4 4 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 22 48

ALTADENA-LONG BEACH LOMA ALTA DR LA RIVER 3212 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles Gateway Cities

Alhambra Bell Gardens Commerce Lakewood Long Beach Montebello Monterey Park Paramount Pasadena San Marino Signal Hill South Gate South Pasadena Unincorporated

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

BLOOMFIELD AVE WHITTIER-UPRR CARSON ST 986 Gateway Cities Cerritos Hawaiian Gardens Lakewood Norwalk Santa Fe Springs Whittier 3 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 20 56

LOS ANGELES-LOWER AZUSA

ROSEMEAD BLVD BIG DALTON WASH 760 San Gabriel Valley Baldwin Park El Monte Irwindale Rosemead Temple City Unincorporated 3 3 3 4 1 1 1 0 1 20 56

Del Amo Blvd COAST COYOTE CREEK 1944 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Carson Cerritos Lakewood Long Beach Los Angeles Redondo Beach Torrance Unincorporated 3 2 3 5 1 1 1 0 1 20 56

MAIN ST HUNTINGTON DR N ARROW HWY 1230 Central Los Angeles San Gabriel Valley Alhambra Arcadia Irwindale Los Angeles San Gabriel Temple City Unincorporated 3 4 2 5 0 1 1 0 1 20 56

BNSF-SOUTH BAY BNSF RR CRENSHAW BLVD 604 South Bay Cities El Segundo Hawthorne Lawndale Redondo Beach Torrance 2 3 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 20 56

EATON WASH NEW YORK DR RIO HONDO 828 Arroyo Verdugo El Monte Pasadena Temple City Unincorporated 2 3 3 5 1 1 1 0 1 20 56

CARSON ST N LONG BEACH BLVD BLOOMFIELD AVE 747 Gateway Cities Hawaiian Gardens Lakewood Long Beach 3 2 3 5 1 1 1 0 1 20 56

WOODMAN AVE SAN FERNANDO RD VENTURA BLVD 989 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 3 4 4 2 1 1 1 1 0 20 56

ARROYO SECO SAN PASCUAL AVE AVE 19 485 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles Los Angeles South Pasadena 4 5 3 2 0 1 1 0 1 20 56

DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL S VERMONT AVE PCH 714 South Bay Cities Carson Los Angeles 5 3 4 2 0 1 1 0 1 20 56

PACOIMA WASHCHANNEL GAVINA AVE LA RIVER 1465 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles San Fernando 4 4 2 3 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

PLUMMER-VALLEY CIRCLE VENTURA BLVD WOODMAN AVE 1749 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles Unincorporated 3 4 2 4 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

MELROSE AVE SANTA MONICA BLVD W SUNSET BLVD 710 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Los Angeles West Hollywood 3 3 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 20 56

ALHAMBRA WASH SPRR SAN GABRIEL RIO HONDO 463 San Gabriel Valley Rosemead San Gabriel Unincorporated 3 3 3 4 1 0 1 0 1 19 70

AVIATION-BNSF-LAX W MANCHESTER AVE MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD

594 South Bay Cities El Segundo Inglewood Los Angeles Manhattan Beach 2 3 2 5 1 0 1 1 1 19 70

SPRR-SAN GABRIEL FREMONT AVE EATON WASH 532 San Gabriel Valley Alhambra San Gabriel Temple City Unincorporated 3 4 3 4 0 0 1 0 1 19 70

WOODRUFF AVE FIRESTONE BLVD E WILLOW ST 890 Gateway Cities Bellflower Downey Lakewood Long Beach 3 2 3 4 0 1 1 1 1 19 70

223RD-WARDLOW VERMONT AVE LONG BEACH BLVD 591 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Carson Long Beach Los Angeles Unincorporated 4 2 4 3 0 1 1 0 1 19 70

VAN NUYS BLVD FOOTHILL BLVD VENTURA BLVD 1022 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 3 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 19 70

LONG BEACH BLVD COYOTE CREEK E BROADWAY 6206 Gateway Cities Long Beach 5 2 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 19 70

LAUREL CANYON BLVD POLK ST VENTURA BLVD 1178 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 3 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 19 70

BRAND-GLENDALE-HYPERION-HIGHLAND-

VERDUGO WASH RODEO RD 1368 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles Glendale Los Angeles 3 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 70

CHANDLER LA RIVER E VERDUGO AVE 1317 Arroyo Verdugo San Fernando Valley Burbank Los Angeles 3 2 3 4 0 1 1 1 1 19 70

CULVER-JEFFERSON S SEPULVEDA BLVD COAST 450 Westside Cities Culver City Los Angeles 2 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 19 70

RIVERSIDE-VERDUGO VAN NUYS BLVD VAN NUYS BLVD 877 Arroyo Verdugo San Fernando Valley Burbank Los Angeles 3 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 19 70

SAN GABRIEL RIVER OLD SAN GABRIEL CYN

COYOTE CREEK 3393 Gateway Cities San Gabriel Valley Azusa Baldwin Park Cerritos Downey Industry Irwindale Lakewood Long Beach Pico Rivera Unincorporated 4 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 18 82

BIG DALTON WASH BIG DALTON DEBRIS DAM

WALNUT CREEK 1084 San Gabriel Valley Azusa Baldwin Park Covina Glendora Irwindale Unincorporated West Covina 3 3 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

LAKEWOOD-ROSEMEAD E ORANGE GROVE BLVD

PCH 2708 Arroyo Verdugo Gateway Cities Los Beach Municipal Airport

Bellflower Downey Lakewood Long Beach Pasadena Pico Rivera Rosemead South Elmonte Temple City Unincorporated

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

ARROYO-VERDUGO VAN NUYS BLVD YORK BLVD 2381 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles San Fernando Valley

Glendale La Canada Flintridge Los Angeles Pasadena South Pasadena 3 4 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

VENTURA-CALABASAS VENTURA COUNTY LINE

N CAHUENGA BLVD 3073 Central Los Angeles Las VirgenesMalibu San Fernando Valley

Agoura Hills Calabasas Los Angeles Unincorporated Westlake Village 2 5 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

PASADENA-YORK OAK GROVE EAGLE ROCK BLVD 1170 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles La Canada Flintridge Los Angeles Pasadena South Pasadena Unincorporated 2 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 18 82

FOOTHILL-SUNLAND-VINELAND

VENTURA BLVD VERDUGO WASH 1839 Arroyo Verdugo San Fernando Valley Glendale La Canada Flintridge Los Angeles Unincorporated 2 2 4 3 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

CULVER-ROBERTSON SANTA MONICA BLVD LINCOLN BLVD 882 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Beverly Hills Culver City Los Angeles West Hollywood 2 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 18 82

PARTHENIA ST CANOGA AVE VAN NUYS BLVD 849 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 3 3 4 2 1 1 0 1 0 18 82

SHERMAN WAY VICTORY BLVD VINELAND AVE 1633 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 18 82

VENICE BLVD OCEAN FRONT WALK CRENSHAW BLVD 9506 Westside Cities Los Angeles 2 3 2 4 1 1 1 1 0 18 82

SAN ANTONIO WASH SAN ANTONIO DAM RIVERSIDE DR 1001 San Gabriel Valley Unincorporated 4 5 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 18 82

FAIRFAX HOLLYWOOD BLVD BALLONA CREEK 446 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Los Angeles West Hollywood 2 3 3 3 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

SUNSET AVE FOOTHILL BLVD PUENTE CREEK 844 San Gabriel Valley Azusa Industry Irwindale Unincorporated West Covina 4 2 4 1 0 1 1 0 1 17 95

LANKERSHIM SP RR BURBANK W CAHUENGA BLVD 704 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 17 95

WHITTIER-UPRR-SPRR SAN GABRIEL RIVER ORANGE COUNTY LINE

780 Gateway Cities Pico Rivera Unincorporated Whittier 3 1 3 5 0 1 0 0 1 17 95

WOODLEY RINALDI ST LA RIVER 780 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 2 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 17 95

17TH ST SANTA MONICA SAN VICENTE BLVD OCEAN PARK BLVD 3052 Westside Cities Santa Monica 1 1 5 5 1 0 1 0 0 17 95

S FIGUEROA ST W 7TH ST W MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR BLVD

3006 Central Los Angeles Los Angeles 4 4 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 17 95

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

30TH ST AVE H AVE P 806 North Los Angeles County Lancaster Unincorporated 1 1 5 5 1 0 0 0 1 17 95

HIGH DESERT CORRIDOR ELIZABETH LAKE RD SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

3122 North Los Angeles County Palmdale Unincorporated 1 1 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 17 95

BALLONA CREEK PACIFIC AVE VENICE BLVD 855 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Culver City Los Angeles 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 17 95

WASHINGTON BLVD WOODBURY RD WOODLYN RD 523 Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena Unincorporated 1 2 5 3 1 1 0 0 1 17 95

SAN JOSE-THOMPSON-LA PUENTE

PUENTE CREEK SAN ANTONIO DAM 2646 San Gabriel Valley Claremont Industry La Puente Pomona Unincorporated Walnut 3 3 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 16 105

COLIMA RD TELEGRAPH RD ORANGE COUNTY LINE

1509 Gateway Cities San Gabriel Valley Diamond Bar Industry Unincorporated Whittier 2 1 2 5 1 0 1 0 1 16 105

JEFFERSON-WESTWOOD LE CONTE AVE S FIGUEROA ST 1099 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Culver City Los Angeles 4 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 16 105

SEPULVEDA RINALDI ST VENICE BLVD 2074 San Fernando Valley Westside Cities Los Angeles Unincorporated 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 16 105

LINCOLN BLVD SAN VICENTE BLVD W MANCHESTER AVE 722 Westside Cities Los Angeles Santa Monica 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 16 105

COLORADO-FOOTHILL LA RIVER SAN ANTONIO WASH 3458 Arroyo Verdugo Central Los Angeles Arcadia Azusa Claremont Duarte Glendale Irwindale La Verne Los Angeles Monrovia Pasadena Pomona San Dimas Unincorporated

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

SEPULVEDA-WILLOW TORRANCE BLVD COYOTE CREEK 1781 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Carson Long Beach Los Angeles Redondo Beach Signal Hill Torrance Unincorporated 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 14 110

SEPULVEDA-PCH SANTA MONICA BLVD PALOS VERDES BLVD 1710 South Bay Cities Westside Cities Culver City El Segundo Hermosa Beach Los Angeles Manhattan Beach Redondo Beach 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

GLENDORA-GRAND LITTLE DALTON WASH SP RR 880 San Gabriel Valley Covina Glendora Industry Unincorporated Walnut West Covina 2 2 1 4 0 1 0 1 1 14 110

ARTESIA BLVD COAST S VERMONT AVE 665 South Bay Cities Gardena Hermosa Beach Manhattan Beach Redondo Beach Torrance 3 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 14 110

AZUSA AVE SAN GABRIEL RIVER COLIMA RD 1230 San Gabriel Valley Azusa Covina Industry Unincorporated West Covina 2 2 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 14 110

BROADWAY-FOUNTAIN-SANTA MONICA

OCEAN AVE W SUNSET BLVD 1424 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Beverly Hills Los Angeles Santa Monica West Hollywood 2 2 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 14 110

PALOS VERDES DRIVE PALOS VERDES BLVD S FIGUEROA ST 779 South Bay Cities Lomita Los Angeles Palos Verdes Estates Rolling Hills Estates 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 14 110

DEVONSHIRE ST TOPANGA CANYON BLVD

PACOIMA WASH 929 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 2 4 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 14 110

BALBOA BLVD SAN FERNANDO RD VENTURA BLVD 1129 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 14 110

MAPLE-CORSON W COLORADO BLVD EATON WASH 8045 Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 0 14 110

RESEDA BLVD RINALDI ST VENTURA BLVD 739 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 14 110

GAFFEY-FRONT W ANAHEIM ST W 26TH ST 4337 South Bay Cities Los Angeles 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 14 110

AVE P 30TH ST W 50TH ST E 811 North Los Angeles County Palmdale Unincorporated 1 1 5 2 1 1 0 0 1 14 110

GOLDEN VALLEY THE OLD ROAD SIERRA HWY 925 North Los Angeles County Santa Clarita Unincorporated 1 1 2 5 1 1 0 0 1 14 110

HUBBARD-RINALDI INDEPENDENCE AVE LASSEN ST

PACOIMA WASH 1371 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles San Fernando 2 3 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 14 110

MOTOR-SPRR-COLORADO OCEAN AVE VENICE BLVD 631 Westside Cities Los Angeles Sana Monica 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

ANAHEIM ST S WESTERN AVE PCH 1026 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Long Beach Los Angeles 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 14 110

COASTAL ROUTE VENTURA COUNTY LINE

LA RIVER 6399 Las VirgenesMalibu South Bay Cities Westside Cities

El Segundo Hermosa Beach Long Beach Los Angeles Malibu Manhattan Beach Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes Redondo Beach Santa Monica Torrance Unincorporated

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

PCH ESPLANADE SAN GABRIEL RIVER 1852 Gateway Cities South Bay Cities Lomita Long Beach Los Angeles Redondo Beach Torrance 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 13 128

SAN GABRIEL-SIERRA MADRE

EATON WASH VALLEY BLVD 671 Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena Rosemead San Gabriel San Marino Unincorporated 2 2 1 4 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

ORANGE LINE RINALDI ST LASSEN ST

VICTORY BLVD 1033 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 13 128

SANTA SUSANA-SPRR VENTURA COUNTY LINE

LASSEN ST 388 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ORANGE GROVE BLVD W COLORADO BLVD ROSEMEAD BLVD 5165 Arroyo Verdugo Pasadena 1 2 4 1 1 1 0 1 0 13 128

ALISO WASH RINALDI ST LA RIVER 680 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 13 128

WINNETKA AVE DEVONSHIRE ST VENTURA BLVD 591 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 13 128

AVE S TOVEY AVE 70TH ST E 786 North Los Angeles County Palmdale Unincorporated 1 1 1 5 1 1 0 0 1 13 128

LITTLE DALTON WASH LITTLE DALTON WASH E ALOSTA AVE 407 San Gabriel Valley Azusa Glendora 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 128

SAN VICENTE BLVD SANTA MONICA BLVD VENICE BLVD 445 Central Los Angeles Westside Cities Beverly Hills Los Angeles 3 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 13 128

MALIBU CANYON MUREAU RD PCH 982 Las VirgenesMalibu Calabasas Malibu Unincorporated 1 1 1 4 1 1 0 0 1 12 139

LOS COYOTES-TERMINO CARSON ST E 3RD ST 5496 Gateway Cities Long Beach 3 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 12 139

NEWHALL AVE SANTA CLARA RIVER SIERRA HWY 4745 North Los Angeles County Santa Clarita 1 1 5 1 0 1 1 0 0 12 139

SAN DIMAS AVE E FOOTHILL BLVD VIA VERDE 3744 San Gabriel Valley San Dimas 2 3 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 12 139

3RD-BROADWAY-LOS CERRITOS

GOLDEN AVE PCH 108 Gateway Cities Long Beach 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 139

FALBROOK AVE ROSCOE BLVD VENTURA BLVD 368 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 1 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 12 139

AVE H 30TH ST W 37TH ST E 6836 North Los Angeles County Unincorporated 1 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 12 139

AVE J 65TH ST W 50TH ST E 1162 North Los Angeles County Lancaster 1 1 5 1 0 1 1 0 0 12 139

BROWNS CANYON SPRR BURBANK LA RIVER 351 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 12 139

BUNDY-CENTINELA-INGLEWOOD

SAN VICENTE BLVD S CENTINELA AVE 635 San Fernando Valley Westside Cities Culver City Los Angeles 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 12 139

MONTANA AVE OCEAN AVE SIN VICENTE BLVD 315 Westside Cities Los Angeles Santa Monica 1 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 12 139

THE OLD ROAD LAKE HUGHES RD SIERRA HWY 1443 North Los Angeles County San Fernando Valley

Los Angeles Unincorporated 1 1 1 4 1 1 0 0 1 12 139

OCEAN-MAIN-VENICE SAN VICENTE BLVD BALLONA CREEK 673 Westside Cities Los Angeles Santa Monica Unincorporated 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 11 151

VICTORY-SPRR VENTURA COUNTY LINE

CANOGA AVE 411 San Fernando Valley Los Angeles 1 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 11 151

AVE N 50TH ST SIERRA BIKE PATH 534 North Los Angeles County Palmdale Unincorporated 1 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 1 11 151

SANTA CLARA RIVER VENTURA COUNTY LINE

SIERRA HWY 1576 North Los Angeles County Santa Clarita Unincorporated 1 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 11 151

ALLEN AVE E ALTADENA DR ORLANDO RD 399 Arroyo Verdugo San Fernando Valley Los Angeles Pasadena San Marino Unincorporated 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 10 155

AVE L 70TH ST W 50TH ST E 1214 North Los Angeles County Lancaster Palmdale Unincorporated 1 1 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 10 155

VERDUGO WASH HONOLULU AVE LA RIVER 7628 Arroyo Verdugo Glendale 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 10 155

COYOTE CREEK TELEGRAPH RD OCEAN AVE 1516 Gateway Cities Santa Fe Springs Unincorporated 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 10 155

COYOTE CREEK EAST IMPERIAL HWY ARTESIA BLVD 437 Gateway Cities La Mirada Unincorporated 1 1 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 10 155

LA MIRADA CREEK ORANGE COUNTY LINE

COYOTE CREEK 489 Gateway Cities La Mirada Santa Fe Springs Unincorporated Whittier 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 8 160

$WWDFKPHQWHWWHURIQWHUHVW)RUP

Measure M Metro Active Transport (MAT) Program

Cycle 1 Letter of Interest

Released February 18 2020

Due April 2 2020 by Noon

Due April 16 2020 by 5 PM

TO APPLY Submit electronically via Dropbox

(httpswwwdropboxcomrequestM52oXZkwRTWuXerdbLjb) or

email to MATProgrammetronet

gtŽƐŶŐĞůĞƐŽƵŶƚǇDĞƚƌŽƉŽůŝƚĂŶdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚǇDĞĂƐƵƌĞDDĞƚƌŽĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚDdͿWƌŽŐƌĂŵ

ǇĐůĞϭgtĞƚƚĞƌŽĨŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ ŽůŝĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ

WƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĂƚŝĐĂƚĞŐŽƌǇ

ampŽƌampŝƌƐƚgtĂƐƚDŝůĞampgtDͿWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝǌĞĂƚĞŐŽƌǇ

gtĞĂĚŐĞŶĐǇEĂŵĞ

WƌŽũĞĐƚEĂŵĞ

DdWƌŽŐƌĂŵǇĐůĞϭgtĞƚƚĞƌŽĨŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ

ϭ

ŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌŽŵƉůĞƚŝŶŐƚŚĞgtĞƚƚĞƌŽĨŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ^ƉŽŶƐŽƌƐĂƉƉůǇŝŶŐ ĨŽƌ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ŝŶƚŚĞampgtDƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĂƚŝĐĐĂƚĞŐŽƌǇƐŚŽƵůĚ ĨŝůůŽƵƚƚŚĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŝŶ ĞĐƚŝŽŶampgtDWƌŽũĞĐƚ ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶͿƉĂŐĞƐϭƚŽ ϲ

^ƉŽŶƐŽƌƐĂƉƉůǇŝŶŐ ĨŽƌĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ŝŶƚŚĞdŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĂƚŝĐĐĂƚĞŐŽƌǇƐŚŽƵůĚ ĨŝůůŽƵƚƚŚĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŝŶ ĞĐƚŝŽŶdŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ WƌŽũĞĐƚ ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶͿƉĂŐĞƐϳƚŽϭϳ

WŚŽŶĞ

ampgtDWƌŽũĞĐƚŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ

WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ƉŽŶƐŽƌŽŶƚĂĐƚŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ

^ƚƌĞĞƚĚĚƌĞƐƐ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

WƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

ŶǇŶǀŽůǀĞĚ ƵďƌĞŐŝŽŶƐŽƌKƐ

Ϯ

Estimated Range of TotalProject Cost Project Funding Request WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƚĂŝůƐ

WƌŽũĞĐƚgtŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ

WƌŽũĞĐƚWŚĂƐĞƐZĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐampƵŶĚŝŶŐ

WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶWƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐŚŽƌƚƐƵŵŵĂƌǇŽĨǇŽƵƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂŶĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƐĐŽƉĞĂŶĚ

ĂŶǇĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚŐŽĂůƐŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐĂŶĚĚĞůŝǀĞƌĂďůĞƐϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

EŽƚĞampgtDƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽŚĂǀĞĂƌĞĨŝŶĞĚƐĐŽƉĞĂŶĚďƵĚŐĞƚĂƚƚŚĞ

ƚŝŵĞŽĨƐƵďŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ

ϯ

WůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞǁŚĞƚŚĞƌĂŶǇĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇͲďĂƐĞĚŽƌŐĂŶŝǌĂƚŝŽŶƐďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐŐƌŽƵƉƐ ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶƐŚĂǀĞĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞĚĂŶǇƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽƌŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ ƚŽ ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ZĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĂŶǇůŽĐĂůŽƌƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƉůĂŶƐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚŚŝƐƚŽƌǇĂŶĚĂŶǇĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚŚĂƐĂůƌĞĂĚǇŽĐĐƵƌƌĞĚϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ĂĐŬŐƌŽƵŶĚŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ

ϰ

WƌŽũĞĐƚDŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞ^ĐŚĞĚƵůĞ

ŽŵƉůĞƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƚĂďůĞŝƐŽƉƚŝŽŶĂůĨŽƌampgtDƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ

dĂƐŬ^ƚĂƌƚĂƚĞ ŶĚĂƚĞ ƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ

ŵŽŶƚŚƐͿDŽŶƚŚ zĞĂƌ DŽŶƚŚ zĞĂƌ

WůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ

ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ƚƵĚŝĞƐWΘͿ

ZŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲtĂǇĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƵƚŝůŝƚǇƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶͿ

ĞƐŝŐŶŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐW^ΘͿ

^ƚĂƌƚŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ

WƌŽũĞĐƚŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶ

ĞƐĐƌŝďĞƚŚĞƐƚĞƉƐǇŽƵǁŝůůƚĂŬĞƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĂĚŚĞƌĞŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞWůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞ ĂŶǇ ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ ƌĞǀŝĞǁĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐƉĞƌŵŝƚ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĂŶǇ ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƉůĂŶƐ ĨŽƌ ŚŽǁ ƚŚĞǇ ǁŝůů ďĞ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚͲ ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇ ĂŶǇĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶŽƌƵƚŝůŝƚǇƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽƌŽƚŚĞƌŬŶŽǁŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŵƉĞĚŝŵĞŶƚƐŽƌĐŽŵƉůŝĐĂƚŝŶŐĨĂĐƚŽƌƐϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϱ

amp WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚWĂƌƚŶĞƌZŽůĞƐĂŶĚZĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ

ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐŽƌŐĂŶŝǌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚŽƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞĂĐƚŝǀĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŶĚŝĐĂƚĞŚŽǁĂŶĚǁŚĞŶƚŚĞŝƌŝŶǀŽůǀĞŵĞŶƚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚampŽƌampgtDƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞƚŚĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƌŽůĞĨŽƌDĞƚƌŽϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

WƌŽƉŽƐĞĚampƵŶĚŝŶŐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐǇĂŶĚŽƌƵĚŐĞƚ

WůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞŝĨůĞǀĞƌĂŐŝŶŐŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚWƌŽǀŝĚĞďƵĚŐĞƚĨŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƐĞĞŬŝŶŐĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĨƵŶĚƐĨŶŽŶĞǁƌŝƚĞEĞƐĐƌŝďĞĂŶǇĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌǇĂĚĚŝƚŝǀĞŶŽŶͲDdĨƵŶĚĞĚͿƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂĨĨĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŶĚƚŝŵĞůŝŶĞƐϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

gtĞƚƚĞƌƐŽĨ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚKƉƚŝŽŶĂůͿ

WůĞĂƐĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĂŶǇŐĞŶĞƌĂůůĞƚƚĞƌƐŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵŝŶƐƚŝƚƵƚŝŽŶĂůŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚƐ ƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĂŶĚ ĂƉĂƌƚ ĨƌŽŵŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐƌŽůĞƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚĞĂƌůŝĞƌŝŶƚŚĞgtĞƚƚĞƌŽĨŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞWĂŐĞ

dŚĞƵŶĚĞƌƐŝŐŶĞĚĂĨĨŝƌŵƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƌĂŐĞŶĐǇŝƐĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚƚŽĂŶĚĂŐƌĞĞƐƚŽƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ

WƌŝŽƌƚŽƚŚĞĞǆĞĐƵƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝǀĞŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵŽĨhŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐDKhͿŽƌampƵŶĚŝŶŐŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚampͿƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉŽŶƐŽƌƐǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚĂŶǇĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌǇĨƵŶĚƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂƌĞĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ

dĞƌŵƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞWƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ

dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞƐƌĞĂĚŝŶĞƐƐƚŽďĞŐŝŶǁŽƌŬĂŶĚƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚǇƚŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨgtKƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůŶŽƚŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŝƚ ŝƐŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŚĂƚǇĐůĞϭDdƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŚĂǀĞƉƌŝŽƌƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐǁŽƌŬĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨƐŽůŝĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ

ŶǇƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚƉĞƌŵŝƚƚŝŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚďǇƚŚĞůŽĐĂůũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůďĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞĚďǇũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐƚĂĨĨƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŝŵĞůǇƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶĂƚŶŽĂĚĚĞĚĐŽƐƚ

WƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůĂĚŚĞƌĞƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĂŶĚĚĞĂĚůŝŶĞƐĂŐƌĞĞĚƵƉŽŶĂŶĚƉƵƚĨŽƌƚŚďǇDĞƚƌŽ

dŚĞƵŶĚĞƌƐŝŐŶĞĚĂůƐŽĂĨĨŝƌŵƐƚŚĂƚŶŽƌĞĐĞŶƚĂƵĚŝƚĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐŚĂǀĞƌĞŶĚĞƌĞĚǇŽƵƌĂŐĞŶĐǇŝŶĞůŝŐŝďůĞƚŽƌĞĐĞŝǀĞƐƚĂƚĞŽƌĨĞĚĞƌĂůĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ

dŚĞƵŶĚĞƌƐŝŐŶĞĚĂůƐŽĂĨĨŝƌŵƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂƌĞƚƌƵĞĂŶĚĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƚŽƚŚĞďĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞŝƌŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŽƌƌŝĚŽƌWƌŽũĞĐƚŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ

^ƚĂƚĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺŝƉͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

KƚŚĞƌƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐKƚŚĞƌƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ

ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĞŶƚŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚZKtĐŽŶƚƌŽůĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƐƉĞĐŝĂůĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ

ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŶŽŶͲŵƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůĞŶƚŝƚŝĞƐĂƐĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞͿ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϭͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞEĂŵĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

dŝƚůĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŵĂŝůͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺWŚŽŶĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϮͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞEĂŵĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŵĂŝůͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺWŚŽŶĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϯͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ϴ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϰͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϱͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϲͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϳͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ŐĞŶĐǇηϴͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ

ϵ

WƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ

ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚZĂŶŐĞŽĨdŽƚĂůWƌŽũĞĐƚŽƐƚ

WƌŽũĞĐƚampƵŶĚŝŶŐZĞƋƵĞƐƚ

WƌŽũĞĐƚWŚĂƐĞƐŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶampƵŶĚŝŶŐZĞƋƵĞƐƚ

ĞƐĐƌŝďĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚĞǆƉůĂŝŶŚŽǁƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƐĂŶĚŽƌĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞƐĞƋƵŝƚǇƐĂĨĞƚǇŚĞĂůƚŚŵŽďŝůŝƚǇĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇƚŽƚŚĞĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƚƚĂĐŚĂWampŵĂƉŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚŝƚƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĞŝƚŚĞƌŵĂƉ^ŚĂƉĞĨŝůĞƐŽƌĂŽŽŐůĞDĂƉƐůŝŶŬƚŚĂƚƐŚŽǁƐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐͲĞƐĐƌŝďĞǁŚĂƚDĞƚƌŽƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝǌĞĚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌŝƐŵŽƐƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƚŽƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚůŝŵŝƚƐĂŶĚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ^ĞĞƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚŽĨǇĐůĞϭ^ŽůŝĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶͿŽƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĞǆƚĞŶĚĂƚŽƚĂůŽĨƚŚƌĞĞŵŝůĞƐĞƐĐƌŝďĞǁŚĂƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐďŝŬĞǁĂǇĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͿƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϭϬ

ŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶĐǇʹĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞŚŽǁƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĞDĞƚƌŽƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝǌĞĚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐŝƚƉĂƌĂůůĞůĚŽĞƐŝƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚĂŶĚŝƐŝƚǁŝƚŚŝŶЪŵŝůĞďƵĨĨĞƌŽĨƚŚĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝǌĞĚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌĨƌŽŵƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇʹĞƐĐƌŝďĞŚŽǁƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƐǁŝƚŚĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƐĂŶǇĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉůĂŶŶĞĚďŝŬĞǁĂǇƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĞƐĐƌŝďĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚŶŽŶͲDdĨƵŶĚĞĚͿĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŽƌŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĂƌĞĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌǇǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚŵĂƉŽĨƌĞůĂƚĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚͿŽĞƐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐƌĞĂƚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂŶĚŽƌďĞƚǁĞĞŶŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĐĞŶƚĞƌƐĂŶĚƉŽŝŶƚƐŽĨŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

DdWƌŽŐƌĂŵǇĐůĞϭgtĞƚƚĞƌŽĨ ŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ

ϭϭ

WƌŽƉŽƐĂůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨƌŽŵŬĞǇĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶŵĂŬĞƌƐĂŶĚƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐampŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŵƵůƚŝͲũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĞůĞĂĚĂŐĞŶĐǇĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŐƌĞĞĚƚŽďǇƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŝŶǀŽůǀĞĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞŝĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶŽƌŝƐĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĂŶĂĚŽƉƚĞĚƉůĂŶĂƐĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞĨŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ŽŶĨŝƌŵƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚĂŶĚŝŶŶŽǀĂƚŝǀĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐǁŝƚŚƚŚŽƵŐŚƚĨƵůĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƌŽůĞƐĂŶĚƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚŝĞƐϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ĞƐĐƌŝďĞƚŚĞůĞǀĞůŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚŝŶǀŽůǀĞŵĞŶƚƚŚƵƐĨĂƌĨƌŽŵŝŶƐƚŝƚƵƚŝŽŶĂůĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚŐƌŽƵƉƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚKƉƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐŽĨůĞƚƚĞƌƐŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚŽƌŽƚŚĞƌĞǆĂŵƉůĞƐŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƵĐŚĂƐŽŶůŝŶĞƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶƐǁĞďƐŝƚĞƐƐŽĐŝĂůͲŵĞĚŝĂĂŶĚĞƚĐϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϭϮ

ŽŵƉůĞƚĞƚŚĞƚĂďůĞďĞůŽǁƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽƌĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽĨŵŝůĞƐƚŽŶĞƐ

ĞƐĐƌŝďĞƚŚĞƐƚĞƉƐǇŽƵǁŝůů ƚĂŬĞƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĂĚŚĞƌĞŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞWůĞĂƐĞŶŽƚĞĂŶǇĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚ ƌĞǀŝĞǁĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐƉĞƌŵŝƚ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĂŶǇ ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐ ĂŶĚƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌŚŽǁƚŚĞǇǁŝůůďĞĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚͲƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂůůǇĂŶǇĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶŽƌƵƚŝůŝƚǇ ƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ Žƌ ŽƚŚĞƌ ŬŶŽǁŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ŝŵƉĞĚŝŵĞŶƚƐ Žƌ ĐŽŵƉůŝĐĂƚŝŶŐ ĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ ϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϭϯ

ĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨWƌŽƉŽƐĞĚWĂƌƚŶĞƌZŽůĞƐĂŶĚZĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ

ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐŽƌŐĂŶŝǌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚŽƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞĂĐƚŝǀĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŶĚŝĐĂƚĞŚŽǁĂŶĚǁŚĞŶƚŚĞŝƌŝŶǀŽůǀĞŵĞŶƚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŽƌŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚEŽƚĞƚŚĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƌŽůĞĨŽƌDĞƚƌŽϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϭϰ

ampƵŶĚŝŶŐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐǇ

ŶƚŚĞďƵĚŐĞƚƚĂďůĞďĞůŽǁůŝƐƚĞĂĐŚƉŚĂƐĞŽĨǁŽƌŬĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚŽƌĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƐŽƵƌĐĞƐďǇƉŚĂƐĞĨƚŚĞƚĂďůĞďĞůŽǁĐĂŶŶŽƚĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞ^ĞĞƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞƚĂďůĞďĞůŽǁĂŶĚƐƵďŵŝƚĂŶĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞgtKƐƵďŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ

WƌŽũĞĐƚWŚĂƐĞƐ

gtŝƐƚampƵŶĚŝŶŐ^ŽƵƌĐĞƐ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

EŽƚĞampŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂƌĞƌĞĂĚǇĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶͿƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĂŶĚďƵĚŐĞƚdŚĞƚĂďůĞďĞůŽǁŝƐĂŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƐĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĨƚŚĞƚĂďůĞďĞůŽǁĐĂŶŶŽƚĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞ^ĞĞƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞƚĂďůĞďĞůŽǁĂŶĚƐƵďŵŝƚĂŶĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞgtKƐƵďŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ

ƚĞŵη ƚĞŵĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ YƵĂŶƚŝƚǇhŶŝƚhŶŝƚŽƐƚ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϭ ĞƚĂŝůĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŝĚWĂĐŬĂŐĞ ŶĂ ŶĂ ŶĂ ΨϮ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶůŝƐƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐďĞůŽǁͿ ŶĂ ŶĂ ŶĂϮϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϴ ŶĂ ŶĂ ŶĂ Ψ

ϮϭϵŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶDŐŵƚ ŶĂ ŶĂ ŶĂ Ψ

dŽƚĂůŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ŶĂ ŶĂ ŶĂ Ψ

ƌĂŶĚdŽƚĂů ŶĂ ŶĂ ŶĂ Ψ

ϭϲ

ampKƚŚĞƌampĂĐƚŽƌƐ

WƌŽƉŽƐĞƌƐĂƌĞĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĚƚŽƐƵŐŐĞƐƚŽƚŚĞƌĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƐƚŽǁŚǇƚŚĞŝƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŝƐƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇĐŽŵƉĞůůŝŶŐŽƌǀĂůƵĂďůĞƉĞƌƚŚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐϭϱϬϬŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌgtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϭϳ

dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞƐ ƌĞĂĚŝŶĞƐƐ ƚŽďĞŐŝŶǁŽƌŬĂŶĚ ƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚǇ ƚŽďĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂƚ ƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨ gtK ƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂů ŶŽƚŝŶŐ ƚŚĂƚ ŝƚ ŝƐ ŶŽƚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ ƚŚĂƚ ǇĐůĞ ϭDdƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ŚĂǀĞƉƌŝŽƌƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐǁŽƌŬĂƚƚŚĞƚŝŵĞŽĨƐŽůŝĐŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

$WWDFKPHQWamp3URMHFWHYHORSPHQW3URFHVV)ORZampKDUWV

MAT Program Project FlowPhase 1 - Pre-Construction

ProgrammedAllocated to MetroMetro Lead

ProgrammedAllocated to LocalLocal Lead

DKhŽƌŽŽƉĞƌĂƟǀĞŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ ampƵŶĚŝŶŐŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚ

ƵƚŚŽƌŝǌĞĨƵŶĚƐĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƟŶŐǁŝƚŚƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

ŽŵƉůĞƚĞWŚĂƐĞϭtŽƌŬZĞƐƵůƟŶŐŝŶƐĐŽƉĞďƵĚŐĞƚĂŶĚƌŽůĞƐĨŽƌWŚĂƐĞϮ

ZĞůĞĂƐĞgtKŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

ǇĐůĞϭDdWƌŽŐƌĂŵWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ^ĞůĞĐƚĞĚ

ŶŝƟĂůŽŶƐƵůƚĂƟŽŶĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞWŚĂƐĞϭgtĞĂĚ

ŽŶƚĂĐƚĂĐŽďgtŝĞďϮϭϯͿϵϮϮͲϰϭϯϮ

ŵĂƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵΛŵĞƚƌŽŶĞƚŚƩƉŵĞƚƌŽŶĞƚŵĂƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ

MAT Program Project FlowPhase 2 - Final Design and Construction

ampŝŶĂůĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵŵĞĚ

Procure

ĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚƵŝůĚƚŚĞWƌŽũĞĐƚ

$WWDFKPHQW6DPSOH5HVROXWLRQ

Sample Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Metro Active Transport Resolution for Los Angeles County Jurisdictions

Resolution No

A RESOLUTION OF THE [City CouncilBoard of Supervisors] OF THE [Jurisdiction] AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH METRO

FOR WORK ON X PROJECT

WHEREAS Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) is committed to advancing active transportation policies and objectives for FirstLast Mile improvements and Active Transportation Corridor projects as detailed in the Board-adopted FirstLast Mile Strategic Plan (2014) and Active Transportation Strategic Plan (2016)

WHEREAS the Measure M sales tax measure was approved by voters in 2016 for Los Angeles Countyrsquos comprehensive plan to improve transportation and ease traffic congestion

WHEREAS the Measure M Expenditure Plan (Attachment X) describes the types of projects and programs that are eligible for funds including both specific projects and programmatic categories

WHEREAS Measure M establishes a regional Metro Active Transport Transit FirstLast Mile (MAT) Program which creates new opportunities to fulfill active transportation policies and objectives

WHEREAS MAT Administrative Procedures (Attachment X) establish the framework for the program which will invest more than $857 million (in 2015 dollars) in active transportation infrastructure throughout Los Angeles County

WHEREAS the MAT Programrsquos Cycle 1 will provide up to $75 million in funding over Fiscal Years 2021-2025 for projects from need-based prioritized lists of FirstLast Mile and Active Transportation Corridor projects including X PROJECT

WHEREAS the MAT Programrsquos Cycle 1 will fund capital projects consistent with Metrorsquos FirstLast Mile Strategic Plan (2014) or Active Transportation Strategic Plan (2016)

WHEREAS [Jurisdiction] X PROJECT will improve (brief project description)

WHEREAS the MAT Program requires a resolution certifying the approval of the execution of an Agreement (Cooperative Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding) between Metro and [Jurisdiction] for work on X PROJECT by the applicantrsquos governing body before execution of said Agreement and

WHEREAS [Jurisdiction] will engage and involve its resources in all appropriate related jurisdiction functions to achieve the goals of the MAT Program including but not limited to implementing FirstLast Mile improvements and Active Transportation Corridor projects encouraging testing and refining of project partnerships and innovative delivery approaches and targeting investments in high need areas

WHEREAS [Jurisdiction] is willing and able to conform to each of the stated terms conditions and limitations imposed upon any such agreement (Attachment X) executed between Metro and the [Jurisdiction]

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the [City CouncilBoard of Supervisors] of [Jurisdiction] State of California as follows 1 The [City CouncilBoard of Supervisors] of [Jurisdiction] hereby agrees to and by this resolution does accept the execution of an Agreement (Cooperative Agreement or Memorandum of Understanding) between the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) and [Jurisdiction] for work on X PROJECT 2 [Jurisdiction] is willing and able to conform to each of the stated terms conditions and limitations imposed upon any such agreement (Attachment X) executed between Metro and the [Jurisdiction]

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the [City CouncilBoard of Supervisors] of the [Jurisdiction] State of California on __________ 201_ by the following vote Attachments X

1 of 9

Metro Active Transport (MAT) Program Cycle 1 Public Participation Plan (PPP) Worksheet

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Sponsoring Agency(ies) Project Category

Project Location

Fiscal Year Submission Date

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

Purpose The purpose of this PPP worksheet is to generate a thoughtful community engagement approach and ensure community participation throughout the project Once completed we suggest using this form as a guide to develop a stand-alone PPP for the project

Instructions Please complete this worksheet by filling in responses in the boxes below Provide tables graphs maps and graphics as appropriate at the end of this form This form includes the following required sections and guiding questions to aid in the responses

x Overall strategic visionx Project Historyx Schedulex Anticipated audiencesx Roles and responsibilities of project partnersx Potential local partnersx Event typex Format for soliciting inputx Equity Considerations

Metro encourages agencies to deploy innovative community engagement techniques and to reach community members who may be not have been engaged previously through traditional outreach

2 of 9

methods For more ideas on innovative community engagement techniques please see the References and Helpful Resources section at the end of this form

Documentation If changes to the PPP are needed written approval from Metro is required Once approved please revise and resubmit this PPP worksheet to Metro Please document ongoing public participation activities in the quarterly reports to Metro using narrative description photos of events sign-in sheets boards and materials etc Further a summary of public participation is required at the completion of each phase of work and will be validated against the completed PPP form for the project

1 Overall Strategic VisionDescribe the public participation goals you intend to achieve through the public participationprocess

Guiding Questions x Who are the intended users of the facilityprojectx How will community support for the project be demonstrated What are critical measures

of support for your community

3 of 9

2 Project HistoryDescribe relevant completed public participation and public process for this project

Guiding Questions x Have there been prior public participation activities associated with the project Who in the

community was engaged and how did they receive the projectx Have there been prior planning activities associated with the project What was the

outcome (eg city council adoption grant submittal etc)

3 ScheduleProvide a draft timeline of public participation activities Ensure that community engagementactivities occur throughout all phases of the project including construction

4 of 9

4 Anticipated AudiencesWhat audiences are you planning to reach throughout the public participation process for thisproject How will groups and individuals be identified

5 Roles and Responsibilities of Project PartnersWhat are the roles and responsibilities of the project partners (ie other agencies that will have anactive role in delivering the project)

5 of 9

6 Potential Local PartnersDescribe which local stakeholders will be impacted by the project and how they will be engageddirectly in the project

Guiding Questions x Who are the relevant or impacted groups such as community organizations schools major

employers key destinations etcx What processes or procedures will be followed to meaningfully involve these groupsx Is there a community-based organization that can help advise on community engagement

techniques

7 Event TypeWhat are the proposed events for this project

Guiding Questions x Will people who work non-traditional work hours be able to participate on the days times

and at the locations of the eventsx What locations or existing fairs or festivals will reach a diverse cross section of the local

communityx Are there unique incentives or giveaways that will draw in community members and

encourage more extensive comments

6 of 9

8 Format for ^oliciting nputDescribe the materials and techniques that will be utilized to reach community members Indicatehow you will reach people who have been hard to reach with traditional outreach methods

Guiding Questions x How will you reach members of disadvantaged communities and non-English speaking

populations For example the availability of community members should be consideredwhen determining the time and day of an event

x Are the materials and presentations in languages (written and oral) that participants canread and understand

x Will parents be able to bring their children or find childcare

7 of 9

9 Equity ConsiderationsIn 2018 Metro adopted the Equity Platform to address transportation inequities throughout LosAngeles County Access to opportunity is a core concept of decision-making public investment andpublic service The adopted Equity Platform is built around four pillars Define and Measure Listenand Learn Focus and Deliver and Train and Grow How will the public participation process and theproject address each pillar listed below

a Define and Measure ldquoPursuing an inclusive conversation that commits to (1) establishmeaningful goals around a shared definition of equity ndash and actions to achieve those goals (2)define metrics to evaluate outcomes including investment decisions (3) ensure considerationat the front end not the back end and (4) seek out and involve the diverse range of voices thatmust collaborate on aboverdquo

b Listen and Learn ldquoEstablishing comprehensive multiple forums to engage the communitymeaningfully and actively in defining measuring and acting on equitable outcomesrdquo

c Focus and Deliver ldquoUnifies activity with two major crosscutting equity areas where Metro leadsand where Metro partners This includes leading roles in performance-based investmentdecisions that advance outcomes to promote and sustain opportunities and avoid outcomesthat aggravate disparities in opportunity and partnering roles to tackle issues such asgentrification displacement and affordable housingrdquo

d Train and Grow ldquoTraining ourselves and others in two important areas associated with equity(1) methods to evaluate equity including data collection measurement and analysis and (2)approaches to effectively communicate and work with communities with priority and respectfor equity issuesrdquo

8 of 9

10 Tables graphs maps and graphics

Please insert tables graphs maps and graphics here

9 of 9

References and Helpful Resources

Metro has completed plans that piloted innovative community engagement techniques that you may find useful We suggest reviewing the community engagement chapters or sections of the following plans Please click the links below

Ă Active Transportation Strategic Plan (httpswwwmetronetprojectsactive-transportation-strategic-plan)

ď Blue Line FirstLast Mile Plan (httpswwwmetronetprojectstransit-oriented-communitiesblue-line-flm)

Đ Foothill Gold Line Phase 2B FirstLast Mile Plan(httpswwwmetronetprojectsfoothill-gold-line-phase-2b-flm)

Ě Inglewood FirstLast Mile Plan (httpswwwmetronetprojectsinglewood_flm)

header METRO ACTIVE TRANSPORT (MAT) PROGRAM
info 13January 15 202013 13
grant name FINAL CYCLE 1 SOLICITATION
51
301 Off
306_es_signersignature

Page 2: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

1

GENERAL PROVISIONS Introduction The Metro Active Transport Transit and FirstLast Mile (MAT) is a multi-year discretionary program within Measure M This Cycle 1 Program establishes goals process and criteria for the five-year cycle of the MAT Program for Fiscal Years 2021-2025 The MAT Program Administrative Procedures were developed in consultation with the Policy Advisory Council (PAC) Active Transportation Working Group The Working Group includes representatives from government agencies and active transportation stakeholder organizations with expertise in pedestrian and bicycle issues Program Purpose and Goals The overarching purpose of the MAT Program is to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation such as biking and walking and enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety Specific Cycle 1 goals include

x Advancing key Metro policies with a focus on the Active Transportation Strategic Plan (ATSP) FirstLast Mile (FLM) policy and the Equity Platform Framework

x Initiating implementation of ATSP-identified firstlast mile projects and active transportation corridors

x Jump-starting action and building momentum for future efforts creating visible tangible results and setting the ground work for implementation at the broad scale envisioned by ATSP

x Encouraging testing and refining project partnerships and innovative delivery approaches and

x Targeting investments in high need areas Program Schedule The schedule below lists the major milestones for the development and adoption of the Cycle 1 program

Milestone Date 1 Policy Advisory Council Meeting

Present and seek concurrence on Administrative Procedures Screening amp Prioritization Methodologies amp Cycle 1 Solicitation

June 11 2019

2 Notice of Cycle InitiationCirculate Schedule to Eligible Recipients

August 26 2019

3 Workshop with Potential ApplicantProposers

September 10 2019

4 CEO Approval of Administrative Procedures September 10 2019

5

Metro Board Meeting Metro staff present Administrative Procedures and Screening amp Prioritization Methodologies and seeks approval for Cycle 1 Solicitation

January 23 2020

Milestone Date

April 16 2020 April 30 2020

Fall 2020

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 3: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

April 16 2020 April 30 2020

Fall 2020

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 4: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

3

4

5

6

7

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 5: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

4

5

6

7

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 6: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

5

6

7

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 7: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

6

7

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 8: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

7

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 9: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

8

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 10: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Selection Process

9

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 11: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

10

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 12: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

11

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 13: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

12

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 14: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

13

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 15: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

14

Selection Process

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 16: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

15

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 17: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

16

None

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 18: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

17

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 19: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

18

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 20: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

0HWKRGRORJ

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 21: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 22: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

StationsStops

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 23: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 24: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 25: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 26: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 27: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 28: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 29: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 30: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Total Weighted

pointsContains

EFCs

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 31: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 32: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 4 4 1 0 1 1 1 1 20 56

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 33: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

4 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 18 82

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 34: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 110

1 2 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 13 128

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 35: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

COC (1-5)

HPI (1-5)

Bike Ped

crashes (1-5)

HIN Intersect

(0-1)

RBN Intersect

(0-1)

FLM Intersect

(0-1)

MM Intersect

(0-1)

Total Score

(30 Max)

Rank

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 36: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 37: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 38: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 39: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭ

WŚŽŶĞ

ŝƚǇ

^ƚĂƚĞ

ŝƉ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 40: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Ϯ

gtŝŵŝƚͿ

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 41: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϯ

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 42: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϰ

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 43: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϱ

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 44: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϲ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 45: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϳ

dŝƚůĞ

ŵĂŝů WŚŽŶĞ

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 46: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϴ

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 47: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϵ

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 48: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϬ

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 49: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϭ

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 50: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϮ

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 51: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϯ

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 52: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϰ

dKdgt Ϳ Ϳ Dd

Ψ Ψ Ψ

dKdgt

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 53: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϱ

dŽƚĂůŽƐƚ

ϮϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϳ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϴ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϵ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϬ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϭ Ψ Ψ

ϮϭϮ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϯ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϰ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϱ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϲ Ψ Ψ

Ϯϭϳ Ψ Ψ

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 54: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϲ

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 55: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ϭϳ

^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 56: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 57: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

ŽĂƌĚĐƟŽŶ

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 58: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Procure

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 59: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 60: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

Resolution No

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 61: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 62: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

1 of 9

ProjectEĂŵĞ

Project Location

Contact Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP

Email Phone

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 63: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

2 of 9

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 64: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

3 of 9

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 65: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

4 of 9

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 66: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

5 of 9

techniques

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 67: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

6 of 9

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 68: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

7 of 9

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 69: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

8 of 9

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Page 70: media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but such expenditures are limited to 0.5% of overall program funding within each cycle.

9 of 9

51
301 Off

Date post:	14-Aug-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

media.metro.netmedia.metro.net/2020/UPDATE-PDF-Cycle-1-Solicitation.pdf · environmental phase, but...

Documents