Medicaid Management
Stacy Calvaruso, CHAMAssistant Vice President – Patient Management, Ochsner Health System
Congressional Budget Office……
Healthcare Reform is expected to result in Medicaid volumes growing
from 39 Million to 55 Million eligible individuals by 2014
Pro-Active Approaches to upcoming Medicaid Changes
• The Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act (PPACA)
• Medicaid Application Processing• External Vendor• Internal Processes
• Financial Counseling• Patient Profiling• Emergency Department Focus
• Metrics to measure success• Denial Reports• Subsequent Visits
Ochsner Health System• SE Louisiana's largest non-profit, academic, multi-specialty,
healthcare delivery system• Named Consumer Choice for Healthcare in New Orleans for
15 consecutive years• Only Louisiana hospital recognized by U.S. News and World
Report as a "Best Hospital" across seven specialty categories
• 8 hospitals • 38 health centers in Louisiana • 12,500 employees • 850+ physicians in over 90 medical specialties • 300 clinical research trials annually
Commonly known as ‘Obamacare’
•Effective March 2010• Specific provisions to be phased in thru 2020
•Effective April 2010• Medicaid eligibility expanded to include all
individuals and families with incomes up to 133% of the poverty level along with a simplified CHIP enrollment process.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)
Patient Management and MEP Unit
Patient Management Division
• Hospital Patient Access Services• Clinic Patient Access Services• Pre-Service Center
• Pre-Registration• Scheduling• Financial Counseling
SWOT - Program Impact• Healthcare Providers should take steps to increase
their understanding of how existing processes may need to be altered in this environment. • Develop multidisciplinary teams that are dedicated to revising key
procedures.
• As a part of overall Healthcare insurance reform programs, there will be a renewed and aggressive nature of reimbursement audits• Close scrutiny of the referral and authorization process. • Many facilities already struggle with this process and Ochsner was
no different.
Overall Objectives• Reduced Authorization and Eligibility Denials
• Ensure consistent financial clearance• Improved POS Collections
• Pre-service patient notification and education• Improved Revenue –
• Fewer delays for Financial Clearance• Decrease Bad Debt Volume – Proactive identification of
options and resources for the patient’s out of pocket liability• 100% screening for Medicaid eligibility• Charity care based on a sliding scale• Prompt pay discounts• Propensity to pay evaluation• No-interest payment plans
2010 Results
Outside Vendor• 6734 Applications• No ED Coverage• No Clinic Coverage• Very limited on-site presence
1 -Medicaid Application Process
Medicaid Application Center
• State Certification for Financial Counselors to accept applications
• 8A – 19P E D coverage• 1 year agreement with new vendor to teach
us how to expand our knowledge • Deep Dive into demographics surrounding
each facility• Extensive work-flow development• Comprehensive training
Financial Counseling – Required!
• Pre-Service Center• Emergency Department• Mobile to Bedside• Clinical Partner • Various Clinics
• Part of treatment team for high $• Walk-in’s
• Open to the Public
Patient Profiling? • Based on data elements
• Age, income, and zip code• Considerations
• Estimated cost of care and patient out of pocket• Propensity to Pay • The likelihood of eligibility for financial assistance
• Financial clearance staff provide “financial informed consent” • patterned after standard pre-surgical informed consent• seeks to educate each patient about coverage benefits• Other options
• 0% Interest Payment Plans• Charity Care, Financial Sponsors, Community Resources, etc.
Prepare for Medicaid Growth
Registration• Eligibility Tool with 270/271 expanded information return • 3rd Party Payor Options
• Victim’s Compensation• Local Charities• Social Security / Disability• COBRA
• Profiling again… Query Medicaid • Medicare primary• Self Pay over 45 yrs old if unemployed
• Inform patients of Medicaid enrollment opportunities• Prioritize screening and enrollment efforts based on expected clinical
outcomes / future needs
The results include approvals, founds coverage and subsequent visits:
Approvals/Founds
•Number/Quantity - 15,246 approvals
•Gross Charges - $57.9 million
•Net Revenue - $13.3 million
Eligibility Program Results
Number/Quantity - 19,961 visits
Gross Charges - $96.0 million
Net Revenue - $21.4 million
Subsequent Visits
Gross Charges - $153.9 million
Net Revenue - $34.7 million (net expected reimbursement)
Program Cost - $7.5M (est)
Program Results for FY 2011
• Understand weaknesses in current process
• Prepare for increase in Medicaid administrative paperwork
• Improve communication and accountability
• Reduce Denials
• Reduce YAA’s
• Expand to areas with missing auth related items
2 - Medicaid Auth Task Force
Objectives
Year 1 Reduction of $9M of Gross Charges in denials Year 1 Reduction of $2.37M in YAASavings to organization Year 1 = $2.2MYear 2 = $1.37MYear 3 = $853KTotal = $4.46M
Estimation of 60% reduction in denials over 12 month period in year 1based on Oct-Dec denials received.
Savings reduced by Database & FTE salaries for 2012.
Expected ROI on project
Top10 Denial Reasons
September thru October 2011 Results
Medicaid Denials
Denial Code Description Count Denied AmountCO-16 Claim missing/lacking info 696 $3,931,206CO-38 Services not authorized/provided by designated provider 509 $566,137CO-29 Timely filing 479 $1,268,251CO-31 Patient not identified as insured (Name/# mis-match) 199 $1,446,232CO-197 Pre-Cert / Authorization missing 159 $1,709,220N29 Missing documentation / notes necessary to support claim 129 $225,612CO-22 Coordination of Benefits 87 $101,545CO-119 Benefit Max Reached 81 $55,607CO-140 PCP Authorization Missing/Invalid 66 $309,961N54 Claim / Authorization do not match 65 $936,165
Total 2,470 $10,549,934
Gross charges denial amount
Top10 Denial Reasons
September - October 2011 Results
Medicaid Denials
Denial Code Description Count Denied AmountCO-16 Claim missing/lacking info 696 $3,931,206CO-38 Services not authorized/provided by designated provider 509 $566,137CO-29 Timely filing 479 $1,268,251CO-31 Patient not identified as insured (Name/# mis-match) 199 $1,446,232CO-197 Pre-Cert / Authorization missing 159 $1,709,220N29 Missing documentation / notes necessary to support claim 129 $225,612CO-22 Coordination of Benefits 87 $101,545CO-119 Benefit Max Reached 81 $55,607CO-140 PCP Authorization Missing/Invalid 66 $309,961N54 Claim / Authorization do not match 65 $936,165
Total 2,470 $10,549,934
Gross charges denial amount
CO-140 PCP Authorization Missing/Invalid
CO-197 Pre-Cert Authorization Missing
First Step - Identify who does what
• Pre-Certs
• Refer
rals
• Aut
horization
s• B
enefi
t Verific
ation
• Pre-R
egistra
tion
• Financial Clearanc
e
• Initia
l Payo
r N
otification
• Initia
l Pre-Cer
tificatio
n• B
enefi
t Verific
ation
• Pay
men
t Arra
nge
ments
• Registra
tion
• Refer
rals
• Continue
d Stay R
eviews
• Initia
l Clinicals
• Facilitates
Peer to Peer
• D/C
assist
ance
• Confirms
appropriate stat
us
Pre-Service Center Admit Department Utilization Mgmnt
Lack of Denial data specific to PM areas Lack of automation Documentation in multiple places Inability to know who was assigned to a patient Complex rules and requirements Rotating staff Leadership challenges
Not my job syndrome!
Second Step – Identify root cause?
Lack of Automation, Communication, and Follow-thru
2nd Step - Remove the excuses!!
How should we resolve the issue?
• Use the data to determine what we are doing wrong• Denials• Claim hold volume• YAA’s
• Determine who should ‘own’ the process• Admissions• Utilization Management
• Fix the problem!
Denial Data Review
All Denials received October thru December 2011( Regardless of Admit Date )
TOTAL NON-AUTH & ELIGIBILITY DENIALS
Denial Category Count Dollars
Eligibility 1,768 $5,611,989
Non-Auth/ MCD Non-Covered 88 $539,055
Non-Auth/ No PCP Referral 1,452 $1,384,250
Non-Auth/ Precert 605 $8,786,058
Grand Total 3,913 $16,321,352
Denial Data ReviewAdmit date prior to 10-1-11Denials received in October – December 2011Gross Denial Amount
TOTAL NON-AUTH & ELIGIBILITY DENIALS
Denial Category Count Dollars
Eligibility 1,197 $3,682,139
Non-Auth/ MCD Non-Covered 54 $423,483
Non-Auth/ No PCP Referral 976 $944,164
Non-Auth/ Precert 399 $5,605,116
Grand Total 2,626 $10,654,903
Team Resources
Map out current flow Include key stake holders in improvement
discussion Identify failures without pointing fingers Identify needs on how to improve
Take Action!
Taking Action…..
Process 1Share denial data, hold weekly meetings, remove the excuses,
identify key stakeholders and share accountability
Process 2Educate on payor guidelines,
understand how to use system, identify tools that work, develop tools
to meet needs
Process 3New reports, leadership involvement,
Access database
Process 4Confirm that efforts match results and
maintain accountability
October – December Denials
TOTAL NON-AUTH & ELIGIBILITY DENIALSADMIT DATE BEFORE/AFTER 10/1/11
NON-AUTH & ELIGIBILITY DENIALS RESULTING IN A YAA
ADMIT DATE BEFORE/AFTER 10/1/11
Denial Category Count Dollars Count Dollars Adj Amount
DOS After 10/01/11 1,287 $5,666,449 38 $517,384 ($36,915)
Eligibility 571 $1,929,850 21 $276,508 ($737)
Non-Auth/ MCD Non-Covered 34 $115,572 3 $12,031 ($49)
Non-Auth/ No PCP Referral 476 $440,086 3 $2,045 ($4,397)
Non-Auth/ Precert 206 $3,180,942 11 $226,800 ($31,732)
DOS Before 10/01/11 2,626 $10,654,903 252 $363,665 ($269,859)
Eligibility 1,197 $3,682,139 102 $105,675 ($14,859)
Non-Auth/ MCD Non-Covered 54 $423,483 4 $11,333 ($291)
Non-Auth/ No PCP Referral 976 $944,164 126 $91,916 ($220,807)
Non-Auth/ Precert 399 $5,605,116 20 $154,741 ($33,902)
Grand Total 3,913 $16,321,352 290 $881,049 ($306,774)
Gross denials and the resulting YAA posted for DOS after October 1, 2011
• Performance Measurement• Ins Ver Secure Rate (Scheduled)• Ins Ver Due Diligence Complete Rates (Non-Scheduled)• PreReg Completion Percentage• Ins Ver and PreReg Days Out
• Authorizations Obtained/Completed• Financial Counseling Sessions Completed
• 100% Inpatient• 90% Emergency Department• 80% Outpatients with Bad Debt and/or High Risk Score
• B/D and Charity Care Adjustments• Claim Edits, Rejections, and Denials• Yield Affecting Adjustments
Metrics to be monitored
•Loss of Revenue due to denials that result in Yield Affecting Adjustments
•Lack of automation to fully assist with cross-department work flow
•Poor communication between the various department
•Inefficiencies that result in rework across the revenue cycle
Lessons LearnedLeveraging technology is crucial to achieving high performancestandards in a volume-driven environment and the increase ofMedicaid patients will impact those who are not ready.
The lack of collaboration across service teams will negatively affectorganizations resulting in the following:
Questions?