+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Medical News

Medical News

Date post: 03-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: truongtram
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
3
1296 Mr. Wakley put in three affidavits, two by Mr. Strange and one by Mr. Williams. The latter said that he had carried on business as a homœpathist for upwards of twenty years and had never had the service of a medical practitioner as "cover" to him. Mr. Strange merely had the use of the consulting-rooms. In his affidavits Mr. Strange said there had never been any partnership between him and Mr. Williams, and the two practices were entirely distinct. He knew nothing whatever about the issue of the circulars to which exception had been taken. After deliberating in private for a. time the Council deter- mined to instruct the registrar to erase from the Medical Register the name of Mr. Strange. The Final Examinations-Dublin University. Sir DYCE DUCKWORTH presented a draft report by the Examination Committee on the reports of the visitors and inspector and the remarks of the examining bodies on the final examinations of the University of Dublin, the Royal University of Ireland and the Conjoint Examining Board in Scotland. He might explain that in all these cases the visitors and inspector were satisfied with the sufficiency of the examinations, although they had passed some minor criticisms. According to their instructions the committee reserved for the end of the cycle of visitations and inspections of exami- nations any report upon matters affecting these examinations as a whole. The cycle would not be completed until two years hence. Dr. HAUGHTON, speaking for the University of Dublin, expressed thanks for the courtesy shown and the pains taken by the visitors in examining into their examinations. They had pointed out certain defects which the University admitted and undertook to remedy. They had, how- I ever, brought forward other points which the University resisted. Sir WALTER FOSTER said that he was sorry the Uni- versity had not received the criticisms of the visitors in a more kindly spirit. He hoped the defects pointed out would be taken to heart by the University. That was the least the Council could ask from it. Dr. GLOVER complained of a conspiracy of silence in regard to this matter and proceeded to comment on certain points in the report. , Sir DYCE DUCKWORTH formally moved that the Council proceed to discuss the report on the examination of the University of Dublin. Dr. GLOVER seconded this motion. Dr. P. HERON WATSON said the distinct understanding was that the Council should have all the reports before discussing them seriatim. The PRESIDENT said that, having regard to a former decision of the Council, they had no alternative but to proceed with the discussion of the report on the examinations of the Uni- versitv of Dublin. Dr. GLOVER, resuming his speech, expressed regret that the University of Dublin, through its examiners, had com- plained that the inspectors had exceeded their function in ex- pressing an opinion as to whether the final examinations were worthy of the University. Technically, no doubt, the business of the inspectors was merely to satisfy themselves that the examinations were a guarantee of competency to practice, but it was not for a great institution like the one in question to object that the inspectors in a secondary paragraph considered the nature2 of the qualification that was to follow and the adequacy of the examination in regard to it. Mr. BRYANT took exception to the test in operative surgery. He thought the mere watching of two operations was most unsatisfactory and that the time would be much better spent in surgical anatomy, the use of instruments and splints or . the reduction of dislocations. Sir DYCE DuCKWORTH moved that the summary of the visitors’ and inspector’s report, as contained in the report of the Examination Committee, relating to the final examination of the University of Dublin be forwarded to the authorities of that University. Sir WALTER FOSTER seconded this motion. After a few words of comment the motion was agreed to. Sir WALTER FOSTER then moved, by way of addition : That the Council regret that the report of the Examination Committee on the report of the visitors and inspector of the Council has disclosed defects in the examination for medical degrees in the University of Dublin, to which the Council .feel it their duty to call the serious attention of the authorities of the University, with a view to their removal." ) Mr. BRUDENELL CARTER seconded this motion. l Sir WILLIAM TURNER thought that it was unfair to the ! University of Dublin to send down an indefinite motion o this kind. It was the duty of Sir Walter Foster to specify , something. l Sir WALTER FOSTER said that the report of the Examina- tion Committee disclosed the defects. i Sir JOHN BANKS pointed out that the University of Dublin , had always shown itself to be ready to accept the suggestion of the Council, and he had no doubt it would do so in this par. ticular instance. Sir WILLIAM TURNER submitted that this addition to the- motion was unnecessary if the report of the Examination Committee disclosed the defects in question. Sir WALTER FOSTER said there was no expression in the report of the opinion of the Council, and that was what he wished. Sir JOHN SIMON expressed his satisfaction with the assur. ance of the University authorities that in future they woule not pass candidates whose spelling was defective. The PRESIDENT said that there was no doubt the University authorities would take in good part any suggestions of the Council and in the circumstances he thought the Council mia-ht rest content with the motion already massed. Sir WALTER FOSTER did not think this was sufficient. If the Council were to exercise any influence upon medical educa- tion it must not be afraid of expressing its opinion. If they simply sent on this report without any comment or any request for serious attention or reform they would be playing the game, played too long by the Council, of allowing their decrees to be inoperative. They ought to have courage to say that there were defects and that these defects should be remedied. * Sir WILLIAM TURNER suggested that it was not a courteous. resolution. DR. GLOVER thought the resolution unnecessary having regard to what had already occurred. Dr. HERON WATSON expressed the view that the resolution would defeat its own purpose. Sir JOHN SIMON said he would like to see some expression of regret at the fact that, out of eighteen candidates passed, five obtained less than half the number of marks. After some further discussion the Council agreed by a. large majority to pass the resolution in the following amended form-viz., "The Council feel it their duty to call the- serious attention of the authorities of the University of Dublir, to the report of the Examination Committee, with a view tc. the removal of the defects of examination, to some of which attention has already been drawn. " Sir JOHN BANKS having made some comment on the report with regard to the Royal University of Ireland, it was agreed to forward the report to the authorities of the University. 2’he Medical Associations Aid Committee. , Mr. WHEELHOUSE formally handed in the report of the committee on medical aid associations. The Council thereupon adjourned. Medical News. ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND.-The following gentlemen passed the first professional examina- tion for the diploma of Fellow in Anatomy and Physiology at, a meeting of the Examiners on the 17th inst. :- William Haig Brodie, M.D., C.M. Edin., student of Edinburgh Uni- versity and St. Mary’s Hospital; William Ledingham Christie. M.R.C.S., M.D. New Zealand. Otago University, New Zealand, and King’s College Hospital; Theodore Henry lonides, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. Lond., University College Hospital ; Arthur Keith, Aber- deen University and University College Hospital; Henry Alford Moffat, Guy’s Hospital; Austin Edward Reynolds, M.R.C.S.,. L. R. C. P. Lond., University College Hospital ; James Smith, Cam- bridge University and St. Thomas’s Hospital; Thomas Morrell Thomas, Guy’s Hospital; and Edwin Josiah Toye, St. Bartholo- mew’s Hospital. Eleven candidates were referred back to their professional studies for six months. Passed on the 18th inst. :- Harold Leslie Barnard, M.R.C.S., L R.C.P.Lond., London Hospital,-, Fourness Barrington, M.B.Edin., Edinburgh University and Univer. sity College Hospital; Archer William Ross Cochraae, St. Bartho- lomew’s and St. Thomas’s Hospitals ; William Sampson Handley, Guy’s Hospital; John George Ogilby Hugh Lane, Guy’s Hospital Thomas Percy Legg, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital and Yorkshire College, Leeds; William Tindall Lister, Cambridge University and University College Hospital ; Maurice Grey Pearson, St. Barthe-
Transcript
Page 1: Medical News

1296

Mr. Wakley put in three affidavits, two by Mr. Strangeand one by Mr. Williams. The latter said that he had carriedon business as a homœpathist for upwards of twenty yearsand had never had the service of a medical practitioneras "cover" to him. Mr. Strange merely had the use ofthe consulting-rooms. In his affidavits Mr. Strange saidthere had never been any partnership between him and Mr.Williams, and the two practices were entirely distinct. Heknew nothing whatever about the issue of the circulars towhich exception had been taken.

After deliberating in private for a. time the Council deter-mined to instruct the registrar to erase from the MedicalRegister the name of Mr. Strange.

The Final Examinations-Dublin University.’ Sir DYCE DUCKWORTH presented a draft report by theExamination Committee on the reports of the visitors andinspector and the remarks of the examining bodies on thefinal examinations of the University of Dublin, the RoyalUniversity of Ireland and the Conjoint Examining Board inScotland. He might explain that in all these cases the visitorsand inspector were satisfied with the sufficiency of theexaminations, although they had passed some minor criticisms.According to their instructions the committee reserved forthe end of the cycle of visitations and inspections of exami-nations any report upon matters affecting these examinationsas a whole. The cycle would not be completed until twoyears hence.

Dr. HAUGHTON, speaking for the University of Dublin,expressed thanks for the courtesy shown and the painstaken by the visitors in examining into their examinations.They had pointed out certain defects which the Universityadmitted and undertook to remedy. They had, how-

Iever, brought forward other points which the Universityresisted.

Sir WALTER FOSTER said that he was sorry the Uni-

versity had not received the criticisms of the visitors in amore kindly spirit. He hoped the defects pointed out wouldbe taken to heart by the University. That was the least theCouncil could ask from it.

Dr. GLOVER complained of a conspiracy of silence in regardto this matter and proceeded to comment on certain points inthe report.

,

Sir DYCE DUCKWORTH formally moved that the Councilproceed to discuss the report on the examination of theUniversity of Dublin.

Dr. GLOVER seconded this motion.Dr. P. HERON WATSON said the distinct understanding was

that the Council should have all the reports before discussingthem seriatim.The PRESIDENT said that, having regard to a former decision

of the Council, they had no alternative but to proceed withthe discussion of the report on the examinations of the Uni-versitv of Dublin.

Dr. GLOVER, resuming his speech, expressed regret thatthe University of Dublin, through its examiners, had com-plained that the inspectors had exceeded their function in ex-pressing an opinion as to whether the final examinations wereworthy of the University. Technically, no doubt, the businessof the inspectors was merely to satisfy themselves that theexaminations were a guarantee of competency to practice, butit was not for a great institution like the one in question toobject that the inspectors in a secondary paragraph consideredthe nature2 of the qualification that was to follow and theadequacy of the examination in regard to it.Mr. BRYANT took exception to the test in operative surgery.

He thought the mere watching of two operations was mostunsatisfactory and that the time would be much better spentin surgical anatomy, the use of instruments and splints or .the reduction of dislocations.

Sir DYCE DuCKWORTH moved that the summary of thevisitors’ and inspector’s report, as contained in the report ofthe Examination Committee, relating to the final examinationof the University of Dublin be forwarded to the authorities ofthat University.

Sir WALTER FOSTER seconded this motion.After a few words of comment the motion was agreed to.Sir WALTER FOSTER then moved, by way of addition :

That the Council regret that the report of the ExaminationCommittee on the report of the visitors and inspector of theCouncil has disclosed defects in the examination for medicaldegrees in the University of Dublin, to which the Council

.feel it their duty to call the serious attention of the authoritiesof the University, with a view to their removal."

) Mr. BRUDENELL CARTER seconded this motion.l Sir WILLIAM TURNER thought that it was unfair to the! University of Dublin to send down an indefinite motion o

this kind. It was the duty of Sir Walter Foster to specify, something.l Sir WALTER FOSTER said that the report of the Examina-

tion Committee disclosed the defects.i Sir JOHN BANKS pointed out that the University of Dublin, had always shown itself to be ready to accept the suggestion

of the Council, and he had no doubt it would do so in this par.ticular instance.

Sir WILLIAM TURNER submitted that this addition to the-motion was unnecessary if the report of the ExaminationCommittee disclosed the defects in question.

Sir WALTER FOSTER said there was no expression in thereport of the opinion of the Council, and that was what hewished.

Sir JOHN SIMON expressed his satisfaction with the assur.ance of the University authorities that in future they woulenot pass candidates whose spelling was defective.The PRESIDENT said that there was no doubt the University

authorities would take in good part any suggestions of theCouncil and in the circumstances he thought the Councilmia-ht rest content with the motion already massed.

Sir WALTER FOSTER did not think this was sufficient. If theCouncil were to exercise any influence upon medical educa-tion it must not be afraid of expressing its opinion. If theysimply sent on this report without any comment or anyrequest for serious attention or reform they would be playingthe game, played too long by the Council, of allowing theirdecrees to be inoperative. They ought to have courage tosay that there were defects and that these defects should beremedied. *

Sir WILLIAM TURNER suggested that it was not a courteous.resolution.DR. GLOVER thought the resolution unnecessary having

regard to what had already occurred.Dr. HERON WATSON expressed the view that the resolution

would defeat its own purpose.Sir JOHN SIMON said he would like to see some expression

of regret at the fact that, out of eighteen candidates passed,five obtained less than half the number of marks.

’ After some further discussion the Council agreed by a.

large majority to pass the resolution in the following amendedform-viz., "The Council feel it their duty to call the-serious attention of the authorities of the University of Dublir,to the report of the Examination Committee, with a view tc.the removal of the defects of examination, to some of whichattention has already been drawn. "

Sir JOHN BANKS having made some comment on the

report with regard to the Royal University of Ireland, itwas agreed to forward the report to the authorities of theUniversity.

2’he Medical Associations Aid Committee., Mr. WHEELHOUSE formally handed in the report of thecommittee on medical aid associations.The Council thereupon adjourned.

Medical News.ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND.-The

following gentlemen passed the first professional examina-tion for the diploma of Fellow in Anatomy and Physiology at,a meeting of the Examiners on the 17th inst. :-William Haig Brodie, M.D., C.M. Edin., student of Edinburgh Uni-

versity and St. Mary’s Hospital; William Ledingham Christie.M.R.C.S., M.D. New Zealand. Otago University, New Zealand, andKing’s College Hospital; Theodore Henry lonides, M.R.C.S.,L.R.C.P. Lond., University College Hospital ; Arthur Keith, Aber-deen University and University College Hospital; Henry AlfordMoffat, Guy’s Hospital; Austin Edward Reynolds, M.R.C.S.,.L. R. C. P. Lond., University College Hospital ; James Smith, Cam-bridge University and St. Thomas’s Hospital; Thomas MorrellThomas, Guy’s Hospital; and Edwin Josiah Toye, St. Bartholo-mew’s Hospital. Eleven candidates were referred back to theirprofessional studies for six months.

Passed on the 18th inst. :-Harold Leslie Barnard, M.R.C.S., L R.C.P.Lond., London Hospital,-,Fourness Barrington, M.B.Edin., Edinburgh University and Univer.sity College Hospital; Archer William Ross Cochraae, St. Bartho-lomew’s and St. Thomas’s Hospitals ; William Sampson Handley,Guy’s Hospital; John George Ogilby Hugh Lane, Guy’s Hospital Thomas Percy Legg, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital and YorkshireCollege, Leeds; William Tindall Lister, Cambridge University andUniversity College Hospital ; Maurice Grey Pearson, St. Barthe-

Page 2: Medical News

1297

lomew’s Hospital ; Alexander Bruce Roxburgh. M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P.Lond., Oxford University and London Hospital; Harold BattyShaw, University College Hospital and Yorkshire College, Leeds;George Herbert Sowry, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital and YorkshireCollege, Leeds. Nine candidates were referred back to their pro-fessional studies for six months.

’Passed on the 19th inst. :-Leonard Thomason Giles, Cambridge University and St. Bartholo-mew’s Hospital; Francis Kenneth Wilson, Westminster Hospital;John Howard Cook, University College Hospital; Ernest FrederickGordon Tucker, London Hospital; and Charles John Harnett,Guy’s Hospital. Eleven candidates were referred back to theirprofessional studies for six months.

Passed on the 20th inst. :-Alfred Dimsey, University College Hospital ; Edward John Dobbin,Middlesex Hospital; and Horace Percy Godfrev, MelbourneUniversity. Seven candidates were referred back to their pro-fessional studies for six months. (Of the total number of 106 candi-dates for this examination, forty-one passed and sixty-five werereferred.)UNIVERSITY OF LONDON.-The following is the

List of candidates who have passed the M.B. Examination’during the present month :—

First Division.-George Fred Bergin, Bristol Medical School ; FrankP. S. Cresswell, B.Sc., Guy’s Hospital ; Wilfrid Edgeccmbe, Uni-versity Colleges, Liverpool and London; Henry Langdale, OwensCollege and Manchester Royal Infirmary ; Arthur James Martin,Mason College and General Hospital, Birmingham ; AlexanderPaine, Charles Paine and Nicholas Charles Ridley, St. Mary’sHospital ; Charles Hubert Roberts, Sr. Bartholomew’s Hospital.

Second Division -Charles Bernard Braithwaite, Frederick Hazell andJames Hannay Muncaster, Guy’s Hospital; James BeuzevilleByles, Ramon Horace Castellote, Isaac Costa, Alfred GoodmanLevy, James Edward Ramsay, John Lorimer Sawers, GeorgeAlexander Watson and Samuel Williams, University College;Arthur James Edge, Robert Cullum Gully, Frederick Johnson,Alfred Charles Ta’Bois and John Williamson, St. Bartholomew’sHospital; Charles Arthur Fuller and Reginald Mander Smyth, St.Mary’s Hospital ; Elias George Hall, Medical School and Royal In-firmary, Bristol, and Guy’s Hospital; Harry Driffield Levick andGeorge Robert Fabris Stillwell, St. Thomas’s Hospital ; JamesHugh Sproat, Queen’s and Mason Colleges, Birmingham.

SOCIETY OF APOTHECARIES OF LONDON.-Thefollowing candidates have passed in the subjects indicatedlaelow :-Surgery.-A. W. V. Clarke, St. Thomas’s Hospital; P. H. Court,

Middlesex Hospital; R. A. Cowie, Cambridge and St. Thomas’sHospital; A. Delve, University College ; S. Gresswell, St. Bartho-lomew’s Hospital; F. J. V. Hall, Birmingham, Queen’s College ;E. C. B. Ibotson, Guy’s Hospital; E. Johnstone, Manchester,Owens College; J. A. Procter, King’s College; C. M. Rhodes, St.Mary’s Hospital; T. J. S. Suffield London Hospital.

Medicine, Forensze Medicine and Midwifery.-H. J. Dean, London’

Hospital; F. J. V. Hall, Birmingham, Queen’s College ; F. Morris,Birmingham, Queen’s College ; C. Stewart, Durham ; G. M. Turner,Cambridge and St. Thomas’s Hospital ; W. H. G. Wilkes, Birming-ham, Queen’s College.

Medicine and Forensic Medicine.-B Saul, Charing-cross Hospital.Medicine and Midwifery.-G. M. Hetherington, King’s College.

Forensic Medicine.-R. Evans and F. L. Underwood, UniversityCollege; W. D. Johns, Durham ; T. J. McDonald, Toronto.

Midwifery.-J. C. Bawden, Liverpool ; A. Delve, University College ;,

G. G. B. Hein, Charing-cross Hospital.The following gentlemen were granted the diploma of the

Society entitling them to practise Medicine, Surgery, andMidwifery :-

Messrs. Bawden, Hall, Johns, Johnstone, Saul, Suffield and Under-wood.

’ ROYAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND.-The followingExhibitions and Honours have been awarded : Second Examina-tionin Medicine: Exhibitions, first class, William J. MacKeown;isecond class (£15), Samuel T. Beggs. Honours, first class,William J. MacKeown ; second class, S. T. Beggs. Upper PassDivision, R. A. Cunningham, James McHenry, Joseph Matson,Humphrey Turkington. Tlaird Examination in Medicine :Exhibitions, first class (.E50), John Dundon ; second class(20), Edward P. McLoughlin. Honours, first class, JohnDundon, E. P. McLoughlin ; second class, Timothy J.O’Meara. Upper Pass Division, Jeremiah O’Callaghan.Medical Degrees Exanaination M.B., B. Ch., B.A. O. Exhibi-tions, first class (;E40), A. Blaney (disqualified by standing),Emily W. Dickson ; second class (£25), William J. Woods.Honours, first class, A. J. Blaney, Emily W. Dickson, WilliamJ. Woods ; second class, Robert L. Leathem. -11-. -D. DegreeExamination Daniel McDonnell.

ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND.-ELECTION OF EXAMINERS.-The following gentlemen havebeen elected examiners for the ensuing year :Anatomy and Surgery-John Barton, William Stoker, Sir William

Stokes, William Thomson.Physiology and Ilistology-J. Alfred Scott.Biology-J. Alfred Scntt.Chemistry and Physics-Robert J. Montgomery.Midwifery and Gynaecology-Samuel R. Mason.Ophthahnology-Arthur Henry Benson, Patrick William Maxwell.Dentistry-John Barton, John J. Burgess, William Stoker, Henry

Gregg Shertoek, Thomas Studley, Charles Wall.

Diploma in State Medicine—Hugh A. Auchinleck, D. Edgar Flinn,William Stoker, P. Crampton Smyly.Midwifery Diploma-Richard Thomas Hearn, Samuel R. Mason,

Jeremiah 0 Donovan.General Education-Frank J. Davys, Robert Morton.

ST. GEORGE’S HOSPITAL GRAPHIC SOCIETY.-Theannual general meeting of this society will be held onTuesday next, May 30th, at 2.30 P.M. After the meeting theannual exhibition will, by permission of the governors, beheld in the board-room of the hospital, and will remain onview until the end of the week.

ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR INCURABLES. - On the18th inst. the friends of this hospital assembled to cele-brate the thirty-seventh anniversary festival of the insti-tution. A goodly company came together under the presi-dency of Mr. W. D. Freshfield, who, in proposing thetoast of the evening, testified, as the result of a personalinspection, to the satisfactory condition of the buildingand its arrangements, as well as to the good order andvisible comfort of the inmates. Donations amounting toabout .E2000 were announced.

THE METROPOLITAN AND NATIONAL NURSINGASSOCIATION.-The Duke of Westminster took the chair atthe annual meeting of this Association, which was held atGrosvenor House a few days ago. In the report of thework of the society it was stated that during the pastyear 1610 cases had received attention at the hands ofthe nurses, and of that number 642 were cases of childrenattending Board schools. The Association was working inclose connexion with the Queen Victoria Jubilee Institute,which had adopted the general system followed by thesociety. The chairman moved the adoption of the report,and Mr. Caine, M.P., in seconding, remarked that very littleof the metropolitan area now remained uncovered by thedistrict nurses.

MEDICO-CHIRURGICAL SOCIETY, GLASGOW.-Atthe annual general meeting of the Society held on the18th inst. the following gentlemen were elected office-bearersfor the session 1893-94 :-President : Dr. Hector C. Cameron.Section of Medicine-Vice-president : Dr. Middleton. Coun-cillors : Dr. Auld and Dr. W. A. M’Lachlan. Secretary :Dr. C. 0. Hawthorne. Section of Surgery-Vice-president :Dr. W. J. Fleming. Councillors: Dr. Dalziel and Dr. MacPhail.Secretary : Dr. John Barlow. Section of Pathology-Vice-president : Dr. Charles Workman. Councillors : Dr. JohnBrown and Dr. T. K. Monro. Secretary : Dr. R. M.Buchanan. Section of Obstetrics—Vice-president : Dr. M.Cameron. Councillors : Dr. Lapraik and Dr. Jardine. Secre-tary : Dr. Lawrence Oliphant. Treasurer : Mr. Henry E.Clarke. General Secretary : Dr. Walker Downie.

KING’S COLLEGE, LONDON.-On the 15th inst. theold students of this College assembled at the HolbornRestaurant to the number of 150, under the presidency ofW. H. Preece, Esq., F.R.S. In proposing the toast ofthe evening, "King’s College," the chairman said it wasforty-eight years since he entered the precincts of King’sCollege and very great changes had been wrought inits affairs during the interval which had elapsed fromthat time to the present. The presidents of three greatengineering societies had been drawn from the ranks ofstudents of the College. Glancing at the calendar he per-ceived that in 1892 the students of King’s College numbered3627 of all classes and in the present year the number hadincreased to 4352. He augured still further prosperity in theaffairs of the College. The Rev. R. J. Knowling, vice-principal,responded to the toast, which was received with acclamation.THE ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN AND

WOMEN.-The friends and supporters of this hospital heldtheir annual dinner on the 15th inst. at the Savoy Hotel, whenthe Bishop of Rochester presided. The report drew attentionto the fact that this charity was the oldest of its kind inLondon, having been established some eighty years ago, andin the course of its existence had ministered to the ailmentsof more than 750,000 poor children, whilst out-patients hadreceived medical relief to the number of 750 persons a week.Complaint was made of the inadequacy of the resources atthe disposal of the treasurer of the hospital, and the chairmanhoped that the sympathy of the company present would mani-fest itself by a liberal contribution to the funds of "one ofthe most needful and best managed of all English hospitals."At the conclusion of the meeting donations to the amount of£590 were announced.

Page 3: Medical News

1298

THE students of the Dental Hospital havearranged to give a grand evening concert on behalf of theDental Hospital of London in aid of the building fund requiredfor erecting a new hospital. The concert will be given onTuesday evening, June 6th, at St. James’s Hall, Piccadilly.GREAT NORTHERN CENTRAL HOSPITAL.-On the

18th inst. the Duke of York presided at the annual dinner ofthe friends and supporters of this charity. The function washeld in the Whitehall Room of the Hotel Métropole and wasnumerously attended. After the usual loyal and patriotictoasts had been proposed and responded to, his Royal High-ness proposed the toast of the evening and in doing so gavea short history of the rise and progress of the hospital. He

regretted that of the ;E30,000 which had been required tocomplete the building 10,000 only had been collected, andhe appealed to the liberality of those present to make upthe deficiency. In the course of the meeting the treasurerannounced that the Duke of York had consented to becomepresident of the charity. Sir William Savory spoke to thetoast of "The Medical Staff " and referred to the importanceof hospitals as a means of furthering the progress of medicineand surgery. In the course of the meeting donations to theamount of C5425 were announced.

Parliamentary Intelligence.NOTES ON CURRENT TOPICS.

Casualties occurring in Industrial Occupations in Scotland.A BILL to make provision for public inquiry in regard to fatal

accidents occurring in industrial employments in Scotland has beenbrought in by the Lord Advocate, Sir G. Trevel;an, and the Solicitor-General for Scotland. Upon the occurrence of such an accident as thatspecified in the Act the Procurator Fiscal is directed to present to thesheriff a petition for the holding of a public inquiry into the cause ofthe fatal injury and the circumstances connected therewith, and there-upon the sheriff is to pronounce an interlocutor directing that a publicinquiry shall be held regarding the matter. The time and place of theinquiry are to be specified as well as the mode in which it is to beconducted.

Vaccination.A Bill to amend the Vaccination Act of 1867 has been prepared and

brought in by Mr. Asquith and Mr. Henry Fowler, the purpose ofwhich is to remove from a person convicted under the said Act the

liability to any penalty for a second or subsequent offence. Moreover, inthe event of default and committal to prison, the person so committed ’Ishall be dealt with as in the case of an ordinary civil debtor. This Actmay be cited as the Vaccination Act, 1893, and shall ba read with theActs 1867 to 1893. The following is the complete text:Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with

the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, andCommons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authorityof the same, as follows :

1.-(1) A person shall not be liable under section twenty-nine orsection thirty-one of the Vaccination Act of 1867 to any penalty for asecond or subsequent offence. (2) Where a person is committed toprison for non-payment of a penalty under either of those sections hebhall be dealt with in like manner as if he bad been committed toprison for non payment of a civil debt.

2. This Act may be cited as the Vaccination Act, 1893, and shall beread with tne Vaccination Acts, 1867 and 1871, and those Acts and thisAct may be cited together as the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1893.

I

THE HOUSE OF LORDS.THURSDAY, MAY 18TH.

Sale of Intoxicating Liquo, (Ireland) Bill.In committee on this Bill, the first clause, which continues the Sale

of Liquors on Sunday (Ireland) Act, 1878, and extends its provisions inregard to closing on the whole of Sundays to Dublin and to othercities, provoked considerable discussion. Lord Rookwood moved anamendment to the effect that m Dublin, Cork, Limerick, Water-ford and Belfast the opening hours, instead of being those fixedby the Act, should be from to 5 P.M.—Lord O’Neill thought thatsome amendment of the kind was inevitable ; but he proposedto amend the amendment by making it to include the city ofBelfast.-Lord Monteagle presented several petitions praying thatentire Sunday closing might be extended to Limerick.-The Earl ofMeath was prepared to support Loid Rookwood in his amendment if hewould substitute 4 o’clock for 5 as the closing hour.-Earl Spencer said,in view of the difference of opinion in regard to two or three of thecities mentioned in the Bill, he would rather that the matter should bereserved for consideration before the Standing Committee.-Lord Rook-wood replied that after the remarks of the noble Earl he would withdrawhis amendment. This was done, a,nd the debate at this stage wasadjourned.

____

THE HOUSE OF COMMONS.FRIDAY, MAY 19TH.

The North Sea Fisheries Bill.The Committee on this Bill was resumed ; but previously to the dis-

eussipn of the measure a question was asked by Mr. T. li Bowles I

regarding the delay which had arisen in publishing the correspondencerelative to the North Sea Liquor Convention, which delay, Sir E. Greyexplained, was rendered necessary by the work connected with theBehring Sea arbitration. To another question on the same subject,put by Mr. Bowles, Mr. Mundella replied that the evils connectedwith the liquor traffic had long been recognised, and for the purposeof controlling that traffic the Government had entered into a newConvention. The objections cited by the hon. member applied equallyto the Sea Fisheries Act, 1883, which had worked admirably. TheHouse then, in committee, proceeded to the discussion of Clause 3,which dealt principally with the restriction of the number of floatinggrog-shops and brothels and for the control of which a new Conventionhad been formed, the former Convention not having been agreed to byFrance. The other clauses were, after discussion, also agreed to, andthe Bill was read a third time.

Sewer Air at HarnpsteadIn reply to a question put by Mr. Weir, Mr. H. Fowler said he was

informed that a few complaints had been made by the inhabitants ofthe parish of St. John, Bampstead, during the last ten years of foul airarising from the sewers, and that Mr. Mansergh, in advising the vestry,did not condemn the system in use in the parish, but, on the contrary,recommended its further development. Accordingly the vestry hadbeen increasing the means of ventilating and cleansing the sewets.

The Sale of Intoxicating Liquors.Leave was obtained to introduce a Bill to prohibit the sale of intoxi.

cating liquors to persons of known drunken habits, and the measurewas subsequently brought up and read a first time.

S2tpply.On the vote to complete the sum of £220,732 for expenditure in respect

of sundry public buildings in Great Britain not provided for in othervotes Sir J. Lubbock said that something ought to be done immediatelyto provide additional accommodation for students coming up for exa.mination at the London University.-Mr. Shaw-Lefevre said that th&Government had not lost sight of the question and suggested thatexamination rooms might be found on the Millbank site. Objectionswere taken to this suggestion, but ultimately the vote was agreed to.

BOOKS ETC. RECEIVED.

ACKRILL, ROBT., Harrogate.Practical Observations on the Harrogate Mineral Waters andChronic Diseases, with Cases. By A. S. Myrtle, M.D., L.R.C.S.,and J. A. Myrtle, M.D., C.M. Fourth Edition. 1893. pp. 242.

BAILLIERE, J. B., ET FILS, Paris.Le Mouvement et les Exercices Physiques. Par le Dr. L. E. Dupuy,

Précédés d’une Introduction par le Dr. Dastre. 1893. pp. 344.

BLACK, A. & C., London.Zoology of the Invertebrata; a Text-book for Students. By Arthur

E. Shipley, M.A. 1893. pp. 458. Price 18s. net.

FROWDE, H., Amen-corner, London, E.C.Helps to the Study of the Bible. Revised Edition. Illustrated,pp. 635.

GRIFFIN, CHAS., & Co., Exeter-street, Strand, London, W.C.Outlines of the Diseases of Women. By J. Phillips, M.A.,M.D. Cantab., F.R.C.P. Illustrated. 1893. pp. 273.

Official Year-book of the Scientific and Learned Societies of GreatBiitain and Ireland. Tenth Annual Issue. 1893. pp. 230.

KIMPTON, H., High Holborn ; and HIRSCHFELD, BROS., Fetter-lane,London.

The Health Resorts of Europe. By Thos. Linn, M.D. With aPreface by A. E. Sansom, M.D., F.R.C.P. 1893. pp. 330.

LEwIS, H. K., Gower-street, London, W.C.A Practical Text-book of the Diseases of Women. By A. H. N.Lewers, M.D. Lond., M.R.C.P. Fourth Edition. Illustrated.1893. pp. 439. Price 10s. 6d.

The Sanitary Inspector’s Handbook. By A. Taylor. Illustrated.1893. pp. 243. Price F s.

Alcohol and Public Health. By J. James Ridge, M.D. SecondEdition. 1893. pp. 91. Price2s.

The Treatment of Constitutional Syphilis. By 0. Ziemssen, M.D.1893. pp. 70. Price 3s. 6d.

MURRAY, JOHN, Albemarle-street, London.The Physiology of the Senses By J. G. M’Kendrick, M.D., LL.D.,and Wm. Snodgrass, M.B., C.M. Illustrated. 1893. pp.318.

SOCIÉTÉ D’EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES, Paris.La Vue : son Hygiène; Ses Maladies. Par Dr. R. Jocqs. 1893pp. 207.

SPRINGER, JULIUS, Berlin.Mikroskopie und Chemie am Krankenbett. Von Dr. H. Lenhartz.

1893. pp. 293.THE OBSTETRICAL SOCIETY, London, Hanover-square, W.

Transactions of the Obstetrical Society of London, Vol. XXXIV...for the year 1892. Price 7s. 6d.

WARNE, F., & Co., Bedford-street, Strand, London, W.C.i Electricity up to Date for Light, Power and Traction. By John B.’, Verity. pp. 163. Price Is. 6d.

Archives de Neurologie. No. 75 (Mai), 1893 (Bureaux du ProgèsMedical, Paris).-Annals of Surgery, Vol. XVII., Part 5, May, 1893(Caasell & Company, London), price 2s.-University of London : TheCalendar for the year 1893-94; Part I., Charters, Regulations,Lists &c. (Eyre & Spottiswotjde, London), price 3s.-Archives ofPedriatrics, May, 1893 (H. K. Lewis, London, and Bailey & Fairchild,New York).-The Popular Science Monthly, May, 1893 (D. Appletonand Co., New York).-Bulletin de 1’Academie de Médecine, .Nos. 17and 18 ; Seance du Avril et Mai, 1893 (G. Masson, Paris).-HealthPropaganda in the Counties; by W. Leslie Mackenzie, M.B,


Recommended